I had to make a comment. These guys are doing a great job. Believe me when I tell you it's more difficult than it looks, especially at night under NVGs / NVS. I was the third Longbow deck landing qualified Aviator in the Army. We were tasked in early 2012 to "make it happen" by ARCENT. A lot of work went into it. We landed on two LPDs (USS New Orleans & USS Pearl Harbor) in the Northern Arabian Gulf. The Navy guys were great. We did a lot of work together. Nice video, keep them coming.
I’m 17 and currently considering going for army aviation, I’m wondering how often Apache pilots fly compared to blackhawks? I heard that the apaches have more maintainence time.
Great to see regular U.S. Army helicopters operating from Naval Vessels. Although this is not new (The 160th SOAR has done it for many years), regular Army aviators haven’t. Interoperability between all the services is guaranteed to add to our lethality and therefore, grant us victory in the battle space (air, land and the seas).
The British Army has all of their Apaches qualified for deck landings. There are some physical changes (mostly folding rotors) that have to take place before they can become fixtures on carriers.
I imagine they would also have to install tie-down points onto the landing gear (standard equipment on all naval aircraft, fixed or rotary-winged) in order to chain the choppers to the deck so they don't go sliding all over the place in rough seas.
Would like to have had 30 of these babies on the Normandy beaches at 6.00 am on June 6, 1944. The allies could have punched though in 3 hours on the beach head and been in land 10 miles by noon.
Did you know the army has the largest naval fleet in the us military also the largest amphibious battle was conducted by the army in Normandy during WW2.
No they don't. All though the Abrams does have a turbine engine not even close to the same size or power output. Abrams is 68 tons and can drive 45 MPH. And that's from personal experience. Apache fully loaded can barely get out the FARP topped off in Afghanistan. Also seen personally as i transitioned to aviation later in my army career.
Interesting that the rocket pods are empty. AFAIK, the navy don't allow rockets onboard their carriers due to historical "mishaps". I wonder if that will change?
@@johnj.wallacewallace2388 Why is something up? The Army has been training on Navy ships like this with Apaches since the 1980's. It is a pretty common thing.
For some strange reason, the Army is looking to operate on ship like the Marines do. Marine Corps AH-1Z and UH-1Y can fold their blades for storage on ships. It also makes it easier for transports like C-17 and C-5s to move them around. AH-64 can't fold their blades so its much harder to get them where they need to go. Being able to operate on ships gives them more options but honestly , its takes away from the Marines mission
@@danielbeckman272 was just going to say that the main rotor blades can be removed without too much trouble. I work at MD Helicopters where the MD 530F Cayuse Warrior is built; and it doesn't seem to take long at all to remove the rotor blades when the aircraft are shipped.
You will get salt from sea- ocean mostly when you fly on low level above sea...Apache has corosion protection because that is ultra expensive and ultra modern machine.
I hope they have countermeasures in place to protect against anti-ship missiles. They must neutralize the enemies ability to fire those anti-ship missiles immediately should open hostilities break out.
Not taking into consideration fuel requirements, I have always thought that Apaches were the best option to defend the Navy SEALS, and the Rangers the days John Chapman lost his life.
I'd think that the more attack aircraft that are available in a contested area like the Persian Gulf; the more likely the Iranians would choose *not* to start something; which is the best outcome. If things do go south however; I'm sure their will be plenty of targets for the Marines.
@@MECH_BOSS2000 idk what effect or whatever they put pn it but it just looks like if you touch that as a physical painting or picture it aoukd feel unpleasant
It is rather not that uncommon to see Army Aviation assets utilize Navy surface vessels, in Joint Forces Operations, pro re nata, as the situation warrants. Many examples in United States Military History of both The Navy and Army working together in Garrison, in the Field, on Deployment and in Action and Active Combat Operations Downrange.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🗽🔪🗡️⚔️💣💥🔥💀☠️
nice to see the skilled cooperation of the services. that ship though- as valuable as it is, it doesn't rate the name "Puller". the Obama DoD really lost the plot naming ships.
I had to make a comment. These guys are doing a great job. Believe me when I tell you it's more difficult than it looks, especially at night under NVGs / NVS. I was the third Longbow deck landing qualified Aviator in the Army. We were tasked in early 2012 to "make it happen" by ARCENT. A lot of work went into it. We landed on two LPDs (USS New Orleans & USS Pearl Harbor) in the Northern Arabian Gulf. The Navy guys were great. We did a lot of work together. Nice video, keep them coming.
Do the Longbow Apaches have capabilities with their sensors that other attack helicopters lack?
These folks did do a great job!
Y
I’m 17 and currently considering going for army aviation, I’m wondering how often Apache pilots fly compared to blackhawks? I heard that the apaches have more maintainence time.
Any idea how classified the radar is? Dcs is making ah-64d but they havent had any promises on the radar...
The Apache. For when your gunship and warthog killstreaks are RTB for resupply.
AH-64 when you care enough to send the very best
Great to see regular U.S. Army helicopters operating from Naval Vessels. Although this is not new (The 160th SOAR has done it for many years), regular Army aviators haven’t. Interoperability between all the services is guaranteed to add to our lethality and therefore, grant us victory in the battle space (air, land and the seas).
Now we are talking! Taking out the Iranian gun boats will be like a turkey shoot for the Apaches!
The British Army has all of their Apaches qualified for deck landings. There are some physical changes (mostly folding rotors) that have to take place before they can become fixtures on carriers.
I believe this is for a Doolittle raid style attack in that these would be for a large unconventional short term operation.
I imagine they would also have to install tie-down points onto the landing gear (standard equipment on all naval aircraft, fixed or rotary-winged) in order to chain the choppers to the deck so they don't go sliding all over the place in rough seas.
@@Orca19904 UK Apaches already use strengthened tie down points for exactly that.
Makes a lot of sense for an island nation
One of the most deadly aircraft every made by man kind
Army Aviation: Above The Best!
Ahhh...when the army and navy finally decides to set aside their differences. What a time to be alive
I think that started with the Doolittle Raid. Those bombers belonged to the army air corp.
Estos son los mas letales..mejor tecnologia y armamento. .
Great camera work..Pilots are skilled to say the least..Thanks for sharing this footage!
I remember the day/night a special group aboard our LPH in the Med, not AH-64 birds!
What are the "wobbly" things about midships on both sides of the copter?
Wobbly mats
Gamatabindle torque wobbler ?
its a donut box in a circular shape.
for FOD ?
Gary Bolton, "wobbly things"! 😝
Apache = Badass = no name change...ever.
These Apaches can be used to be deployed into coastal and land for operations other than conducting naval operations.
Great training n best attack helicopter
Very awesome!
2:00 what a smoothness...
I love these bad boys sure enough get job done Kuddos ♥️🇺🇸 💙👍
Gonna be looking for some nice tasty Iranian boats. Yum yum
LOVED IT
DLQs on ESB3 USS Lewis B “Chesty” PULLER.
Would like to have had 30 of these babies on the Normandy beaches at 6.00 am on June 6, 1944. The allies could have punched though in 3 hours on the beach head and been in land 10 miles by noon.
3 hours if you are being paid by the hour, 2 if you don't hold back milking it; )
海の上で飛ぶ対地攻撃機ってなんかいいね
Your videos reaffirm my god given rights to liberty and freedom on a daily basis. Thanks.
That looks awesome
The Apache's look so precise. I wouldn't fancy defending against a swarm of these..........just sayin'
beautiful birds
My pilots! hell yeah Mr. Eramo!
Almost nothing in the air is as intimidating as an Apache.
YES. If you’re an opposition force and you know Apaches are airborne; consider yourself DEAD!
All they have to do now is paint em Grey and they'll be good to go.
Did you know the army has the largest naval fleet in the us military also the largest amphibious battle was conducted by the army in Normandy during WW2.
How about a modified A-10 squadron as part of a MEU? I’d like to see some Brrrrrrrrt at sea.
One of the best sounds in the world other than the A-10 overhead....
Viva USA !!!!!!!
Number 1 force planete woooooow
Superb video 👍
A-10 Warthog's brother...the Apache!!!
🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
AH-64's and Pilots getting their Sealegs ...Hell Yeah.
What are those i assume sensors, that sticks out quite far on the left and right side of each engine panel? You can see it swivelling about at 0:36
HADS probes, air data sensors.
Apache to Cobra pilot, “ why is the ground moving?” Cobra pilot replies “ It’s not, those are Marines charging into battle.” Semper fi.
Boot
Saludo men desde mexico
Can't help but notice the similar turbine sound when the Apache and the Abrams tank start up. Do they have similar engines?
No they don't. All though the Abrams does have a turbine engine not even close to the same size or power output. Abrams is 68 tons and can drive 45 MPH. And that's from personal experience. Apache fully loaded can barely get out the FARP topped off in Afghanistan. Also seen personally as i transitioned to aviation later in my army career.
Looks like the military is looking for assets that overlap as they have decided to divest in some helicopter capabilities for the U.S. marines🤔
3:01, kino
great video !
Awesome 🧚♀️👏🏼 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Can anyone tell me what those flaps on the deck are? I could only think maybe they help re direct rotor wash
If they stay on a moving ship.
Those army guys would be sea sick!!🤣😅
Very true, I was part of the UK Apache sea trials when I was Army, hated being at sea that long!
What are the tubes hang mid engine on both sides?
This is my boomstick.
Que duro son estas maquinas
Interesting that the rocket pods are empty. AFAIK, the navy don't allow rockets onboard their carriers due to historical "mishaps". I wonder if that will change?
This is only a deck landing trial, no requirement for them to be armed yet.
Send me more ...The appearance of fighter jets
Apache would be great as an anti-submarine warfare helicopter
How do I get 1 of these bad boys??? My ex and her whole family have the COVID-19
R.thanks🙂
I thought the army only uses JP8 fuel and the navy only uses JP5. Did they put JP5 in an Apache?
Brian Bunch yes, JP5
Flown by WO's?
Is navy acquiring?
Wow, It's my 1st time seeing Apache on Navy platforms. Are they in Navy's service, or there's a joint operating of Navy and Army?
Something is up
@@johnj.wallacewallace2388 Why is something up? The Army has been training on Navy ships like this with Apaches since the 1980's. It is a pretty common thing.
For some strange reason, the Army is looking to operate on ship like the Marines do. Marine Corps AH-1Z and UH-1Y can fold their blades for storage on ships. It also makes it easier for transports like C-17 and C-5s to move them around. AH-64 can't fold their blades so its much harder to get them where they need to go. Being able to operate on ships gives them more options but honestly , its takes away from the Marines mission
verdebusterAP you can actually fold the blades on apaches, tho not too common because it is a pain in the booty. Easier to remove them most cases
@@danielbeckman272 was just going to say that the main rotor blades can be removed without too much trouble. I work at MD Helicopters where the MD 530F Cayuse Warrior is built; and it doesn't seem to take long at all to remove the rotor blades when the aircraft are shipped.
Bad Bird's.. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Is it ok for those aircrafts designed without corrosion protection at sea to operate on ships?
You will get salt from sea- ocean mostly when you fly on low level above sea...Apache has corosion protection because that is ultra expensive and ultra modern machine.
can also wash
@@zepter00 the army Apache doesn't have that. the marines were supposed to get a SeaApache but could not due to budget.
@@thegreatdogzilla5855 is viper not enough for them to do the job?
📽️😎👍👍👍👍🚁🚁🚁🚁🚁🦅 I would know I'm from Texas great video guys was general Garrison around
New army Apache helmets?
I hope they have countermeasures in place to protect against anti-ship missiles. They must neutralize the enemies ability to fire those anti-ship missiles immediately should open hostilities break out.
They'll be smoking holes.
Man those Apaches are sexy machine's..
What are those plates which move cuz of the Apache?
@Ryan yea thats my thoughts too, but didn't know it really
@Ryan deflecting?
May?
maybe trap FOD?
The hunter and the savage from gta v looks a lot like them, maybe the design is based on those choppers
Cecii 7 I took one down with a sniper 😂 whats so cool. about em
@@MECH_BOSS2000 yeah it's easy to take them down 😂
Not taking into consideration fuel requirements, I have always thought that Apaches were the best option to defend the Navy SEALS, and the Rangers the days John Chapman lost his life.
Which seat is the pilot?
orgcoast top. Gunner is the one below him
Rear seat. Gunner up front.
🇺🇸🗽
Hmmm. Wonder what the Marines think?
USA power...👍👍👍👍
Beautiful, strong, and respected. No wonder a lot of people sexually identify as attack helicopters
Even as a Marine, I don't really see the need for it. The army can do what we do, just less well
I'd think that the more attack aircraft that are available in a contested area like the Persian Gulf; the more likely the Iranians would choose *not* to start something; which is the best outcome. If things do go south however; I'm sure their will be plenty of targets for the Marines.
Send THEM to Maduro
👏
Now if Ukraine had 2 squads of these types of helicopters how long would it take them to flush out the ruskies
That thumbnail is so triggering lmao
BC ELITE lol
@@MECH_BOSS2000 idk what effect or whatever they put pn it but it just looks like if you touch that as a physical painting or picture it aoukd feel unpleasant
It is rather not that uncommon to see Army Aviation assets utilize Navy surface vessels, in Joint Forces Operations, pro re nata, as the situation warrants. Many examples in United States Military History of both The Navy and Army working together in Garrison, in the Field, on Deployment and in Action and Active Combat Operations Downrange.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🗽🔪🗡️⚔️💣💥🔥💀☠️
Too bad the jar heads don't have these.... won't even have tanks anymore !
The MARINES don't need them. They have "Super cobras".
@@patrickfullan9509 Vipers are pretty kick ass to be fair.
No big deal, what the hell was that all about? ?
😳😳😳😳
❤🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩❤👍
I love china
they are out of fashion hahahaha
nice to see the skilled cooperation of the services. that ship though- as valuable as it is, it doesn't rate the name "Puller". the Obama DoD really lost the plot naming ships.
Try that in heavy seas!!!
Bad ass
Told you ican hear