for you guys who doesnt understand why he didnt take the rook,its because the king would have no legal moves,basiclly stalemate,which it would also explain why c6 is a blunder.
I 100% would have stalemated this game because when the rook was next to the king all those times I was like TAKE THE ROOK then after like 5 moves I realized that it would be stalemate which was why the pawn move was a blunder Well, I would have stalemated given that part of the game, no way I would even get close to stalemate against a 2300 bot
how do you 1. Not see the evaluation bar go to a draw for 5 moves and 2. Not see that the rook moves are labeled with the star, showing how they are the best move for 5 moves and 3. Somehow think that a 2000 rated bot would blunder a rook 5 times. God damn just use your eyes????
@@penguin2985 It's called instinct and pressure. As OP had just mentioned, when he saw the rook, he thought "TAKE THE ROOK", he tunnel visioned to that one thing, ignoring the rest. Are you perhaps the blind one or is just naturally illiterate?
Yooo, this man lost a rock by pre-moving and at the end he somehow won a drawn position Lesson: Never premoving against bots cuz they are not humans and bots are unpredictable
The basic chess principles are : 1. Control the centre 2. Develop your minor peices and 3. Put your king to safety then go for an attack. if you notice, in this match i'm ahead in development in comparison with black, black king is still in the centre and his knight and rook is undeveloped while all of my peices are developed, i have finished castling and i'm ready to attack. so what what black should do is finish his development as soon as possible and come to an equal position but a move like Qc6 doesn't make any sense.... you're already behind of development and you are moving the developed queen two times for no valid reason so it is a blunder.
And now i checked it with stockfish, so stockfish want black to move knight f6 (Nf6) which offcourse make sense because instead of Qc6 if black would have played Nf6 that would at least not put black into much worse position. if you play games at higher level then blunder doesn't means a move which losses a peice or hangs the checkmate but blunder is also considered as a move which put you in a much worse position. I hope you understand what i'm trying to say!
This is not accurate, I've been playing with chess.com bots for a long time and on basis of that i can say : A 2300 bot is equal to a real 2300 human player when it comes to opening, A 2000 player in the middle game and a 1700 player at the endgames (as they make silly mistakes at endgames) You can't just declare 2300 bot an absolute 1600 player, A 2300 bot plays with much more accuracy than any 1600 human, it is very common for 1600's to blunder a piece while the bots don't do usually. If you're a 1300 and were able to beat a 2500 bot then it's must be because the bot might had given you advantage , otherwise the 2500 chess.com bot will crush you 99.99% of the time. I'm saying this because when i was 1300 i used to get crushed by a 2500 bot almost all times.
@@TheKnightFork The 2300 bots blunder pawns all the time, the worst case scenario if I am focusing I get into a worse endgame which I can draw, the best case scenario the bot blunders pawns for absolutely no reason and I win easily. Not even a 1200 would blunder 3 pawns in 1 game, and the 2300 bot does that
you said the 2300 bot feels like a 1600 and you are a 1300 and you said "no wonder why i can beat 2500 bot" HOW IS A 2300 BOT GOOD FEELS LIKE A 1600 BUT A 2500 CAN NOT BEAT YOU AND YOU ARE A 1300
@@football_editsz545 idk, I beat 1600s all the time. I lose to 1300s more often tbh probably cuz I play them more. Also the bots' strengths seemed to have increased recently, they don't play unsound openings anymore
@@smilesdb if you think you can do a better edit of this game then show me, prove it otherwise don't be toxic. the editing can only be done as according to game situations ...
@@TheZombie2415 didn't he mention that he had premoved? plus engine says even stupid move excellent when your advantage is too high that even losing the rook doesn't matter at all and the position is still completely winning.
4:05 and 5:02 blunders that ruined the game without them, White would have won in his pocket I would be 100% wrong at 4:17-4:52 I would take a rook and get a pat because there will be no moves and 1:38 this is a take on the pass
@@bloopscrusts5390 it was a forced draw after i blunder (pushing pawn to c6) but the bot also made blunder by taking the pawn on c6 expecting that i will capture his rook on c6 and its still a draw but offcourse i didn't take the rook.
@@ФилипКолев-ж5с notice when i moved pawn to c6 i already made a blunder by trapping his king, his king has no square to go so all the bot needs to draw this match is sacrifice his rook by giving perpetual checks and once i take his rook his king has no sqaure to go so that would be a draw it is called stalemate.
at this position white is completely winning so i guess the engine thinks if white will eliminate black's only pawn and then even blunder both rooks still White's three pawn & king vs black king & rook, white will win!
For if your rate is above 1500 or sometime even 1000 and you play against a player then of your enemy sacrifices a good piece or a piece even pawn then u better think deeply because it is a deadly trap well when we analyze it is a blunder but if we won it a brilliant but mostly the analyze won’t understand why so it will give us a blunder or mistake but if it stalemate then the sacra is brilliant , excellent or best or perfect
It puts the black king in a spot that would be stalemate if he was alone, which is why white couldn't take the took while it was doing all those point-blank checks. That means the bot could've forced a draw by continuing to make non-capture checks until it either gets accepted, repeated, or reaches the move limit rule for perpetual inaction.
@@TheKnightFork Well, you can read the title in two ways. I read it as a 2000 standard match. I've no idea what Baka Mitai is, or it's strength. Sorry about that!
I can't move a pawn when my king is in check and if you are talking about the position when the black rook is on c8 then playing b7 is a bad move it will loose the pawn.
It's Called the *Great Move* which is defined as the only move which you must play to not go into bad position or the only move which you must play to not miss the advantage when the opponent has done slight mistake. it's just equal to best move but it is notated at special situations in game.
@@TheKnightFork If say black plays (after white's Ne7) Ra8, Rf4 is not checkmate. The king can go to e8. It's certainly not good, but Rf4 is not direct mate as you seem to suggest. Am I missing something?
@@davidcopson5800 After Ne7, Ra8, Rf4+ Black king has only square e8 then Ng6 discovered check and black king can't go to d8 cause then he will loose his both rooks after Rxf8+ so black king goes to d7 white will capture rook on f8 with his knight or rook and black can't even take back as the rook on f8 is attacked twice. So, Ra8 will cause black loosing his rook for free, and Rf4+ is not mate threat tho, my apologies!
for you guys who doesnt understand why he didnt take the rook,its because the king would have no legal moves,basiclly stalemate,which it would also explain why c6 is a blunder.
wait the problem is his other pieces can move so no stalemate
oh I thought u talked about queen c6 lol
@@egem4m you mostly likely read only at other half of the sentence
I knew it
Right ur smart
The fact that blundering a rook is still an "excellent" move because they are winning by so much💀👏
Bruh its because stalemate
@@Kirito_wr Bruh it's a joke.
@@Kirito_wr I think he is talking about the premove blunder where white lost his second rook
4:04 the most painful part about making a blunder is looking at your bar on the left plumuting down
Why is it a blunder?
@@furahajeanluc7792 It blocks the black king from being able to escape, so if the bot just sacks the rook, it'll be a draw.
I 100% would have stalemated this game because when the rook was next to the king all those times I was like TAKE THE ROOK then after like 5 moves I realized that it would be stalemate which was why the pawn move was a blunder
Well, I would have stalemated given that part of the game, no way I would even get close to stalemate against a 2300 bot
SAME
I practiced the situation with bots, and I often end up in this situation,so I realised that if someone offers you a piece in endgame,dont accept it
@@Slash4608 Basically, if your opponent does a stupid move, that's probably a trap.
how do you 1. Not see the evaluation bar go to a draw for 5 moves and 2. Not see that the rook moves are labeled with the star, showing how they are the best move for 5 moves and 3. Somehow think that a 2000 rated bot would blunder a rook 5 times. God damn just use your eyes????
@@penguin2985 It's called instinct and pressure. As OP had just mentioned, when he saw the rook, he thought "TAKE THE ROOK", he tunnel visioned to that one thing, ignoring the rest. Are you perhaps the blind one or is just naturally illiterate?
4:04 Crazy Rook moment time start
4:46 The end of the Crazy Rook
How can you be so good at chess and then fail the ladder mate lol
And then blunder stalemate!
@@TheKnightFork *almost blunder stalemate
@@lukarancini1630 He blundered stalemate. A blunder of your opponent giving you back the win, does not take away the stalemate blunder.
_the knight im ur friend._
This has better plot than most movies I’ve watched
In the future when every game is a book move
Edit: HOLY MOLY 200 likes :D
it already exit it is a checkmate like in a few moves
ruclips.net/video/xvFZjo5PgG0/видео.html
that's impossible actually
@@KrazyDragon it's a joke
@Lenard Roi Alba was it the Scholar's mate? The e4, e5, then you get your queen and bishop out?
@Lenard Roi Alba ah cool!
Wow what a freaky game that was !!
thanks for watching!
The Knight ruclips.net/video/qHMAVeXykhk/видео.html
I always get confident when I see a game open with the Sicilian Opening
Yooo, this man lost a rock by pre-moving and at the end he somehow won a drawn position
Lesson: Never premoving against bots cuz they are not humans and bots are unpredictable
I hate it when I lose rocks as well
_yoo man you say yoo_
200 rated players: hello
white won but at what cost
I don't understand why Qc6 a blunder. It doesn't look like losing any materials. Anyone good at chess please explain that to me for a lesson
The basic chess principles are : 1. Control the centre 2. Develop your minor peices and 3. Put your king to safety then go for an attack.
if you notice, in this match i'm ahead in development in comparison with black, black king is still in the centre and his knight and rook is undeveloped while all of my peices are developed, i have finished castling and i'm ready to attack.
so what what black should do is finish his development as soon as possible and come to an equal position but a move like Qc6 doesn't make any sense.... you're already behind of development and you are moving the developed queen two times for no valid reason so it is a blunder.
And now i checked it with stockfish, so stockfish want black to move knight f6 (Nf6) which offcourse make sense because instead of Qc6 if black would have played Nf6 that would at least not put black into much worse position.
if you play games at higher level then blunder doesn't means a move which losses a peice or hangs the checkmate but blunder is also considered as a move which put you in a much worse position.
I hope you understand what i'm trying to say!
@@TheKnightFork Thanks. I'm just 900 rated so that's why I was confused
My pleasure! and you can check out my other videos, i hope you'll like them.
Its does absolutely nothing
2:09 better move would had been Re3 pinning the bishop to the king and winning it
No, then the bot just take your bishop on c5 and defend his bishop on f5.
That was a Baka Mitai, but not with Low elo rated, it was Smart Mitai with High rated Player xD
Well, i and the bot, both made stupid blunders at endgame and that's why i thought i can make a baka mitai version of it!
??? He says 2000 rating. Is that wrong?
@@TheKnightFork 💀
That just straight up bullying 💀💀
2300 how? That bot feels like at most a 1600 strength. No wonder why I can beat 2500 bot when I am only 1300 rated
This is not accurate, I've been playing with chess.com bots for a long time and on basis of that i can say : A 2300 bot is equal to a real 2300 human player when it comes to opening, A 2000 player in the middle game and a 1700 player at the endgames (as they make silly mistakes at endgames) You can't just declare 2300 bot an absolute 1600 player, A 2300 bot plays with much more accuracy than any 1600 human, it is very common for 1600's to blunder a piece while the bots don't do usually. If you're a 1300 and were able to beat a 2500 bot then it's must be because the bot might had given you advantage , otherwise the 2500 chess.com bot will crush you 99.99% of the time. I'm saying this because when i was 1300 i used to get crushed by a 2500 bot almost all times.
@@TheKnightFork The 2300 bots blunder pawns all the time, the worst case scenario if I am focusing I get into a worse endgame which I can draw, the best case scenario the bot blunders pawns for absolutely no reason and I win easily. Not even a 1200 would blunder 3 pawns in 1 game, and the 2300 bot does that
you said the 2300 bot feels like a 1600 and you are a 1300 and you said "no wonder why i can beat 2500 bot" HOW IS A 2300 BOT GOOD FEELS LIKE A 1600 BUT A 2500 CAN NOT BEAT YOU AND YOU ARE A 1300
@@football_editsz545 idk, I beat 1600s all the time. I lose to 1300s more often tbh probably cuz I play them more. Also the bots' strengths seemed to have increased recently, they don't play unsound openings anymore
@@jasonhe5578 but I think it is true that bots are worse than what they are rated
He had so many opportunities to pick up the Rook at the end. someone explain why he didn't?
the same comment has been asked by almost 20 people in comment section,if i take the rook it's stalemate (draw) the black king has no escape.
In basic terms he didn't just want a draw he wants a win
The black would have no other pieces to move and it would be a stalemate
There is that!
Stalemate
You play nearly at GM level, to you actually think about your positioning?
These guys: No
My 900 ass would have lost to stalemate in that rook king situation lol.
Well you can actually keep doing that until draw by 50 moves rule
But also the matter of time too
How does this person find ways to make a game of chess interesting with edits
They didn’t do much, all they did was that stupid gun thing and some memes.
@@smilesdb but why is it surprisingly entertaining
@@waffluer3961 Maybe for you, but I think it's effortless.
@@smilesdb watch my other videos and you might see some sort of efforts!
@@smilesdb if you think you can do a better edit of this game then show me, prove it otherwise don't be toxic. the editing can only be done as according to game situations ...
3:18 How was this an excellent move though, this was just straight up losing a rook 🤣
Sacrifice logic
Yeah it makes no sense and there's no stalemate either.
If he traded the enemy rook with one of his the game would be over.
@@TheZombie2415 didn't he mention that he had premoved? plus engine says even stupid move excellent when your advantage is too high that even losing the rook doesn't matter at all and the position is still completely winning.
0:59 why is that blunder?
Knight Gang!! Good To See My Fellow Black Knight
Wow You Hearted My Comment, btw I started making content like yours, you inspired me
i instantly saw the best moves even though i’m just a 1300 rating
seems like its programmed to play best moves with a mistake from time to time
I will still never not be happy seeing an en passant
bruh the cut
he is playing french chess
when 1-movers are best moves, but still dumb
That was a lot of book moves
4:05 and 5:02 blunders that ruined the game without them, White would have won in his pocket I would be 100% wrong at 4:17-4:52 I would take a rook and get a pat because there will be no moves and 1:38 this is a take on the pass
Missed mate so many times
2300 bot plays worse than 1500😂
My going to show this to my friend who doesn't know how to play chess
Beyond my comprehension...
Thanks!
This is pure art.
Premoves sometimes screw your game
the most nasty muddy win I've seen🤣🤣
Ok, really cool tactic at the end.
???? Why white king didn't kill rook?
If white king killed rook, black king wouldn't be able to move, and it would be stalemate... a draw.
@@bloopscrusts5390 oh i see thx for explanation
@@bloopscrusts5390 it was a forced draw after i blunder (pushing pawn to c6) but the bot also made blunder by taking the pawn on c6 expecting that i will capture his rook on c6 and its still a draw but offcourse i didn't take the rook.
3:21 this is why you don’t premove
do you have your accuracy for the game?
I had approx 92 and the bot had around 87%.
@@TheKnightFork thats really impressive,gg
Why was black queen to c6 at 1:00 a blunder?
I am trying to learn to play chess and i don't understand why you didn't take the rook. Please someone explain to me🙏
I am talking about 4:22
@@ФилипКолев-ж5с notice when i moved pawn to c6 i already made a blunder by trapping his king, his king has no square to go so all the bot needs to draw this match is sacrifice his rook by giving perpetual checks and once i take his rook his king has no sqaure to go so that would be a draw it is called stalemate.
If he takes the rook it's a stalemate. The black king is not in check but has no legal moves.
@@TheKnightFork thank you!
@@Tehom1 thanks!
bruh how is that 2300 so bad
well played
SUBSCRIBED
3:02 Why did the engine suggest Rxa6 it's completely wrong?
at this position white is completely winning so i guess the engine thinks if white will eliminate black's only pawn and then even blunder both rooks still White's three pawn & king vs black king & rook, white will win!
Why didnt he capture the rook already in endgame
stalemate!
@@TheKnightFork oh sorry didnt see that
*goes crazy*
For if your rate is above 1500 or sometime even 1000 and you play against a player then of your enemy sacrifices a good piece or a piece even pawn then u better think deeply because it is a deadly trap well when we analyze it is a blunder but if we won it a brilliant but mostly the analyze won’t understand why so it will give us a blunder or mistake but if it stalemate then the sacra is brilliant , excellent or best or perfect
1:35 Wait what?
It's a move called en passant
Google it
Why was queen c6 a blunder?
how get live analysis?
1:38 wait a minute something wrong
En Passant
Have anyone known the title songs of this video
Baka mitai (song name)
Why e7 was an error????? It is basiclly check mate in the next move
Black can check and sacrifice rook for stalemate
Ahh the en passant
What's the song name
the music is so funny
Woah what a wild game
😂 .....
anyway what song did you used ?
song name - baka mitai
Why did white king didn't kill black rook
c6 stalemate blunder
link music please
I don't understand, why didn't the king take z Knight ....
It's protected by rook!
The black rook and king 👑
But what are you singing
the legendary baka mitai!
Y is every move a book move
*1:37**: **_En passant_*
What name song
confused why 1:02 is a great move.
1:38 it looks kinda sus there
En passant
this game is sus
It’s not francis bot
does someone has time to explain me why c6 4:04 is a blunder?
It puts the black king in a spot that would be stalemate if he was alone, which is why white couldn't take the took while it was doing all those point-blank checks. That means the bot could've forced a draw by continuing to make non-capture checks until it either gets accepted, repeated, or reaches the move limit rule for perpetual inaction.
This is not a 2000 rated match. Too many trivial blunders. More like 1200?
Are you expecting a good chess game while you already saw baka mitai in the title??
@@TheKnightFork Well, you can read the title in two ways. I read it as a 2000 standard match.
I've no idea what Baka Mitai is, or it's strength. Sorry about that!
Yo can you tell my why did you not exhange your rook at 3:17 but let your opponent take your rook?
He's premoved
Trying to ladder mate.
Ending🤣🤣😂😂.
4:57 you should move the pawn from b6 to b7
I can't move a pawn when my king is in check and if you are talking about the position when the black rook is on c8 then playing b7 is a bad move it will loose the pawn.
What is "!" ?
I know "!!" Means brilliant move, but what about "!"
It's Called the *Great Move* which is defined as the only move which you must play to not go into bad position or the only move which you must play to not miss the advantage when the opponent has done slight mistake. it's just equal to best move but it is notated at special situations in game.
Hello! Contragts with 300k views on this video! Want to ask - what is average time of view on this video? If not secret please tell)
Please Mail me at Neonidx@gmail.com
1:35 hol up why that pawn disappear?
suprised no ones talking about it
It’s en passant
@@eliel8569 literally all chess players know what en passant is and it’s not surprising for them though
1:42 how the fuck can he take that pawn if is parallel to the other pawn????? Hu????
hacking skills!!
En passant
@@TheKnightFork LuL
at 2:31 why black didn't save it's rook ??
because Rf4 is mate.
@@TheKnightFork If say black plays (after white's Ne7) Ra8, Rf4 is not checkmate. The king can go to e8. It's certainly not good, but Rf4 is not direct mate as you seem to suggest. Am I missing something?
@@davidcopson5800 After Ne7, Ra8, Rf4+ Black king has only square e8 then Ng6 discovered check and black king can't go to d8 cause then he will loose his both rooks after Rxf8+ so black king goes to d7 white will capture rook on f8 with his knight or rook and black can't even take back as the rook on f8 is attacked twice.
So, Ra8 will cause black loosing his rook for free, and Rf4+ is not mate threat tho, my apologies!
@@TheKnightFork Yeah, I saw that. I was just being pedantic and questioning your statement that 'Rf4 is mate'.
2:24
D4 a E4
F3 a F8
XD????
i am spanish
can i post a game against francis where francis also blundered when it was a draw and i won lol
u can do a BAKA MITAI part at that bit
send game URL at neonidx@gmail.com
@@TheKnightFork nvm i cant find it but it was an epic game :(
Donate a cat
1:36 wtf happened why was the pawn able to kill the other pawn they were side by side
hacking skills!
@@TheKnightFork LoL
En passant
whats ur rating
I've already replied the same question in a other comment. (1740) rapid
4:35 why tf he not killing
Would result in draw by stale mate
I don’t get it why didn’t you just take the rook?
idk man you need to figure this out by yourself.
@@mhkk1491 thank you
the timing on the editing for this video is all wrong
1:36 did anyone notice
Go through comments, you'll see a couple of 1:36-1:39, that's en passnat move if you don't know.
Black pawn was in d5 then if white moved to b6 how did it move and how the d5 pawn disappeared
Black pawn was in d5 then if white moved to b6 how did it move and how the d5 pawn disappeared
www.google.com/amp/s/www.chess.com/amp/terms/en-passant
Ok but why is this
Disappointing ending. :(
This is so funny.
Wonderful game
1:36 huh??
En passant