Warning Why this is review so late // CineBot30 V2 // Nearly or Maybe under 250 grams

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 дек 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @SpartanOfLuxon
    @SpartanOfLuxon День назад +5

    Hey Nick, You have in the description and title as Cinebot but you were correct in the video to call it "CineLog".
    Just figured I point it out, hope you and your family have a happy new year.

    • @NickBurnsFPV
      @NickBurnsFPV  23 часа назад

      Thank you. I believe I have it sorted out now.

  • @marrenirre9994
    @marrenirre9994 19 часов назад +1

    Why did you title this CineBOT 30?

  • @Birbal2001
    @Birbal2001 3 часа назад

    How your neighbours cope with the noise when you fly outside?

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations День назад

    Fantastic flying and review, Nick!!! 😃
    Happy holidays!
    Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

  • @Nspecthergadget2010
    @Nspecthergadget2010 День назад

    Great review. Hope your Christmas was good. Thanks for the show and tell.

  • @FPV-TV419
    @FPV-TV419 День назад

    Im pretty sure the camera soft mounting is purely to remove any vibrations to the 03 on board electronic image stabilisation only. Its not designed to replace electronic stabilisation

  • @nikhayes3396
    @nikhayes3396 21 час назад

    @10:00 that almost seemed like “airmode” bounces but, you probably already know that, seems like airmode does that funky bounce on arming and landing with certain weight quads, do you fly with airmode on all the time? I always put airmode on a switch that way I can perch or if I bounce off of a stick or wall I quickly switch off airmode. I am sure you know all of this. Just didnt mention it at all.

  • @slowvoltage
    @slowvoltage День назад +1

    lock that O3 down and test again
    if the tune is good, the rigid changes would make the soft mount bobble
    the good tune feels this and attempts to correct, causing the issue again and again
    I appreciate you 🙏🏽

  • @gori_maheswari8994
    @gori_maheswari8994 15 часов назад

    Giveaway result kb ayega

  • @krazed0451
    @krazed0451 День назад +2

    Title needs some proof reading lol

  • @chrise.3114
    @chrise.3114 День назад

    Nice! Don't know, if this is for me, but interesting review!

  • @FlybyJames
    @FlybyJames День назад +1

    Thanks for the review. I have a very poor opinion of Geprc. Having owned most of the cinewhoop models and either sold them or just took the loss and parted them out. Over engineered IMO and for me the camera dampening system is garbage along with the prop guards and motors. My last attempt at Geprc was with the Cinebot 25 V2. I had the same issues with the camera and I put it up for sale. I have given Geprc more than enough of my money and would not recommend their cinewhoops to anyone.

    • @superdstar2001
      @superdstar2001 День назад

      You stated multiple times that you don't like GepRC, but the only negative thing you've said is that some components are "garbage". Lots of people, including myself, would disagree with you. I have a Cinebot30 and it's been all over the country. Started as analog and swapped it to Moonlight when I got digital goggles. I would recommend it to everyone.

    • @apollodorusII
      @apollodorusII День назад

      Which cinewhoop would you recommend for smooth, cinematic flights? Thanks in advance.

    • @FlybyJames
      @FlybyJames День назад

      @@superdstar2001 My opinion. The prop guards are garbage on the cinelogs, the motors are garbage and so is the camera dampening. Not much left besides the frame and FC. I have owned Cinelog20 Cinelog 25v1 and v2, Cinebot 25v2 and Cinelog 35v1. I have sold 2 of them and parted out the rest. I am not the only one with the same issues with the product lines. I fly my whoops hard and Geprc doesn't hold up to even a little bit of abuse. I have a bag of those damn damping balls and floss, cant even recall how many Ive had to replace. All my Geps ended up with broken guards, broken motors and camera vibrations/jello. If all I did was use the Gep's for real estate shoots they might be sufficient but even then there is much better options. IMO

    • @FlybyJames
      @FlybyJames 23 часа назад

      @@apollodorusII IMO Best results are always with custom drones. For indoor use I love the Pavo 25 v2, I replaced the lavas for 1504's 3100kv.Very smooth great for slow/flat indoor flying with a naked Gopro. For outdoor use I have had good luck with Axis Flying C30 and C35 v2 frames.The Speedybee 35 BNF is a nice cruising drone. I have a full lineup of custom Hurricane 20-35 inch frames from CNCdrones, great for Gopros. If I had to choose a BNF I would go Speedybee35 for outdoor smooth cruising and the Pavo 25v2 for indoor/outdoor gopro shots. Sub 250 Huma 20, Flytimes/Flylens BNF's for indoor 03 shots.

    • @superdstar2001
      @superdstar2001 15 часов назад

      @ Your experience is 4-5 of almost primarily the exact same product of the exact same size. How could you possibly form an opinion of an entire company based on that?
      My GepRC products have been great. They’ve held up to lots of abuse. The motors have never had an issue on any of the ones I’ve used. The prop protection is a good mix of weight and durability. The camera dampening works as intended. I’ve flown a naked GoPro, a runcam 5, an Action4, and I’ve had 0 problems. If it was not popular, they would stop using it.

  • @argentinaerialsFPV
    @argentinaerialsFPV День назад

    Fly good this quad I only see the flight time it's very low! 2.5inch make 6/7 min fly time

  • @nodxarb
    @nodxarb День назад +1

    Fix it title :P love the video though ❤

    • @NickBurnsFPV
      @NickBurnsFPV  23 часа назад

      Ooops. should be better now. Thanks for calling that out

  • @kingkieck
    @kingkieck День назад

    Hopefully it wasn't late because of grammar lessons. 😅 Just playin' but I couldn't resist the opportunity.

  • @YouFPVtube
    @YouFPVtube День назад

    😁

  • @muhammadzaki4987
    @muhammadzaki4987 День назад

    You're looking a bit fuller.

    • @AleckFPV
      @AleckFPV 15 часов назад +1

      Not necessary.