Genghis Kahn Refused to Invade India - Why? | Reaction
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2023
- Come and join me to see me react to Abijit Chadva discussing why Genghis Khan refused to invade India.
IG: zuzanareacts
Original Video: • Why Genghis Khan Refus... 
Развлечения
India was invaded but never defeated
😂 what is invaded but never defeated.
Are you are saying we let every invader rule us.
Read some history.
@@Rahulkumar-jh6srdepends on one's definition of defeat.
A better statement would be
Indian infidels were defeated but stayed infidels and kaffirs
@@SmallusDicckus Indians have one religion for long time and then one more appeared. How are there majority of infidels .
That's why I said read history.
You can't argue against facts with imagination.
May be your area has deficiency of books 😂.
Are you crazy? Many Muslim rulers invaded india. British invaded india.
French invaded india. Dutch invaded india.
@@atulsain6170 so you are saying we got invaded but we were not defeated.
Let me tell you:
We were defeated and we learned and changed many things, and fought for independence. Now we stand equal to top countries.
If you don't want to accept this, then go live in your imagination with butterflies.
🔴 The Way She Said "BHARAT" 🥰👍
Abhijeet sir is a scientist and and he knows more about history then most historians
maybe about Indian history - I have seen multiple wrong things from him already and I'm very apprehensive about listening to him since.
@@zuzanareactswhat wrong things are you referring to? Maybe we could debate the sources, archaeological, DNA and pottery evidences.
@@zuzanareacts if you are that apprehensive, don't bring his content ever again. It seemed you've made a pre conceived notion about him. Ironically, you're still seeking for his point of view means either you're waiting to hear something 'apprehensive' from him only to criticize him or you know that more Indians means more views.
@@zuzanareactsYou are correct in your appraisal.
Currently hindus are trying to rewrite history to fit their narrative. And he is one of the many upper caste hindus involved in this.
It sounds almost bigotted, but it is wise to be skeptical when you see science and history discussed by a hindu.
Do not take your retractors in your comments, in good faith. They are prone to lie to you and pretend to be indignant if you use your critical thinking and spurn their lies. Lets hope this sad culture simmers down and disappears.
@@soumik231 be kind
Wait till you realise that he is actually a astrophysicist.
Yes this man is an all rounder in knowledge....
I love his insights on various matters ...
Abhijit Chavda in the house... finally after such a long time 😁❤️
Today I learn that, betrayal is in Chinese DNA.
Western historians can't accept the fact that an eastern barbarian is greater than their alexander, ceasar, napoleon etc, while muslim historians loathed the fact that a non believer brought them to their knees, what a great line, its spot on
I hope it's not true
Bring full podcast of Abhijit chavada sir in ranveer show about ancient bharat ❤❤❤😊😊
Abhijit sir one of the best...who studied in Switzerland and spent his most of his life(childhood and early age) in europe
Look - from what I have seen, I personally don't trust his information is correct - he made some very wild and I thought deeply concerning comments/ conclusions that are just point-blank wrong so from then on - maybe he is good at Indian history but really lacks understanding about at least Europe from what I've seen.
Agree and disagree simultaneously at the same time in Europe perspective
@@zuzanareacts what ukraine war has shown is how much avg european is brainwashed by their media. they'll support even nazis if their media media tells them to. but i think poland hungary and slovakia populace have somewhat coherent thinking here. just my opinion.
that subject is very tricky. I wouldn't generalise. I think you could say Central European countries has a very similar stance to India = there is no place for this in the 21st century.
@@zuzanareacts very tricky is very much acceptable 😌😁
"I am the punishment of God... If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you."
"If you're afraid - don't do it, - if you're doing it - don't be afraid!"
- Genghis Khan ( The Great Mongol Emperor )
History is something written by the winners.
Jai hind jai bharat.🇮🇳❤🇸🇰
I think when it comes to historians they often pick those fishes from ocean of history which are significant for them and their country's interest but also
shortage of time, lack of proper reach to particular communities(Because their ancestors history had been destroyed by enemies of that kingdom) and
the lack of interest can be the reason.
Chawda is a physicist.nd a scientist nd a historian.he can be called an scholar or an arya by indian defination
He's not a historian nor a political analyst. Hes just a youtuber
I think historians should be giving primary sources so that interested people can learn more about the topic.
9:12 remember this STORY : In one situation 3 Tridevis ( goddess Saraswathi (Knowledge), goddess Parvati (Power)and goddess Lakshmi ( Wealth) ) quarrel themselves that they are more powerful influence on Humans... Then they asked their husbands who was more powerful... Lord Shiv and Lord Vishnu voted for Knowledge and Lord Bramha voted for Wealth
Why both Shiva and Vishnu voted for Knowledge shouldn't one vote for power 🤔🤔
@@captainjsparrow7665knowledge is power beyond imagination of normal human being 😊
Knowledge of cosmos is definitely a great power
Chengiz Khan didn't invade India because he came on a horse and India had elephants. Elephants are bigger, so that's settled.
Then why did Seleucus Nicator invade India ? He also came on Greek horses not elephants. No European nation has elephants. Didn't they invade India ?
I wonder why Abijit's view is a little different from others when it comes to Europe. He sees Europe differently from today's Europe. For him, Russia, Romania, Slovakia, Belarus, and some other countries are different from other European countries?.
Maybe he sees Europe from a different perspective; it could be based on Anglo-Saxon , native perspectives, genetics, or perhaps from an expansionist cultural standpoint. Abijit should consider making a video to share his perspective
no - he just creates very wrong conclusions - Europe is a big continent and if you don't live here and understand what's going on - you can easily come to just very random unfounded conclusions. It's like me trying to study about India and having my opinions I wouldn't dare because I don't live there and don't understand it
maybe you should make videos once in a while that explains the nuances of europe that usually a non european would miss @@zuzanareacts
@@zuzanareacts Well Mr Chavda was brought up / schooled in Switzerland or some other European country. He credits that to being the reason why he is not as fluent in Hindi as he would like. In videos like these where he is the only narrator, he provides references and quotes to show his reasoning. But in other videos where he has guests, he allows them to talk things that might be idiotic in the extreme. He has a valid reason for that. He says that he doesnt want to impose his viewpoint onto the guest. Otherwise what is the point of having guests. Those make for some frustrating episodes to watch. I remember being especially frustrated with an European lady guest and he never bothered to push back her points. The next episode he clarified why, but that was a painful episode to watch.
@@zuzanareactsHe has spent his childhood, and I think even his teenage years, in Europe.
Bro really sneaked in churchill 💀
Abijit is 100 💯 percent correct 100 percent of the time.
Abhijit pulls these info from his back.
22:05 in case of the typical renowned "indologists" describing indian history don't usually go the the original sources, which includes renowned Indian indologists as well as the foreign indologist😄😏
P.S.- in Indian history academic sphere the most renowned ancient indian historian doesn't even know sanskrit language, same is the case with most renowned medieval india history is a person who don't know persian, and don't know why acedemics from the west also quote these two "renowned historians", it boggles my mind 😂
One can clearly see his hindutwa right wing ideology coming into play while narrating his version of selective pseudo history...Though some parts are correct to be fair with him but he mostly skipped giant chunk of mongol history just to make mongol empire look hindu friendly empire...It's very clear and i think she is smart enough to get that... He made barbarian savages mongols look like some sort of saints and not told the part of histroy where they butchered almost entire civilians where ever they went.. That's called selective and biased narration of history...Neither Europeans nor Islamic world completely despise Mongols...It's the part where they caused massive genocides of the civilians amd destroying the books of House of Wisdom in Bagdad, Iraq is what despised by Europeans and Islamic World...He also didn't said the very grandsons of Gengiz Khan and his entire army accepted Islam and lateron those very Muslim Mongols came to india in the form of Mughal empire which they keep on crying about...!
thank you for sharing!
GK was never motivated by power rather revenge. He know his enemies prepared and closed them from history books. He never invaded Tsars or Hindu kings as he has nothing to do with them.
You have a very calming and soothing voice. I think you should start singing.
+1
really? and I never liked my voice 🙈
@@zuzanareacts Zuzana, do more Sadhguru videos, history to politics, Hitler to stalin, he has spoken about many things, kindly watch.
It so happens that I am reading his biography written by Frank Mclynn for the last week . Now I will pay more attention to the points made about him in this video.
My midlander friend tells me...bro you are Mongolian race, but irony is i have never been to Mongolia 😂
If u got Time Machine , who you will get from History?
Like to see Ramayana and Mahabharat LIVE
Here I would disagree a bit with Abhijit Sir.
1. The reason why Mongols did not attack India is bcos a revolt ocurred in eastern part of his empire. And he went there in order to quell those revolts.
2. Was Genghis Kahn a great conqueror, yes but was he a great emperor, answer is no. He just used to conquer land but was a failed administrator, economist, visionary, and did not have much idea welfare and prosperity of his people. and did nor have much knowledge about academics, music , art or literature etc. As he just used to move forward and conquer land but did not maintain those land which he already had bcos of which after a point of time , there were constant revolts in his empire and in his behind lands as he moved forward. And his empire was highly unstable. So his later life went on just quelling those revolts. And it resulted in break up of his empire into 4 parts or more. So all what he achieved , started to decline within his own life time. So a great emperor is defined after considering all the aspects and factors. Some eg of great emperors are - like from India , they are : Kanishka, Chandragupta Maurya, Samudragupta, Lalitaditya & Rajendra Chola. As per the real history of India, not only their empire went beyond the boundaries of India but they were equally great in other aspects too. And from Europe, I would say - Napoleon was a great emperor.
3. Regarding Turkic dynasty in India before mughals, their actual rule was only limited to Delhi and nearby areas. That is why they were called - Delhi Sultanate. And the biggest power in India at that time were the Ranas of Mewar before mughals. And Mewar was the power centre of North India. And now coming to question, why Ranas were not interested in capturing Delhi, is bcos Delhi was a landlocked area and did not serve any purpose to them. And there was no practical benefit at that time in capturing Delhi.
I am Mongol and I kind of agree with you. He said himself that it is easy to conquer the world from the back of the horse. But Governing isn't easy.
& This In Reality #Moguls doesn't came in India. It was Turkik invaders who later make a nation called Turkey
9:15 I say this most of times you can agree 😎💪😏😌😌 power is power so gain it may be in different form
abhijeet sir is a gem do of him more
Learned a lot today
Cholas was powerful than khan so he dint invade India.wiki military says cholas had 60000 elephants and two million soldiers at the peak.cholas had powerful navy.khan knows this,so he dint invade India.king Ashoka was defeated by chera chola and pandian
What the west teaches us,
Alexendar was a Great hero,
Ghenghez khan was a Great villain
The one we taught wrong were actually right! #History
Yali , Elephant and one horn unicorn this animal's are the simbol of ancient United indian civilization.. soo that's means protector God of india says to ' changes Khan ' don't invade India!.. 🤔😁
Well no one really creates History. So it would make sense to ask for a speaker’s sources rather than outrightly rejecting what he says
I'm not outright rejecting things. Source is important but also is their correct interpretation.
Servus, Zuzana! Are you a professor or a teacher? XD I watched a video of yours a few months ago, and it seemed to me that you were taking notes. Well, anyway, I would suggest you watch more of Chavda's videos, but be aware that he is also one of those people who have a biased viewpoint on things (Especially when it comes to European and Middle eastern contexts).
Hi, I have a degree in teaching actually but never really taught. Yes, I found some of his videos/information flat-out wrong so I personally don't take him as anyone credible. I watch him as people are really keen and I hope he is right about Indian history but anything to do with Europe is I'm very very dubious of.
Very cool ! xd
Honestly I am on the same page, I don't think I would be a professor with my history degree atm.
I like to watch such videos because it's interesting to know people's perspectives on certain narratives.
I am a history major and it's better to read stuff from multiple ends.
He is sorta right about Indian history but then again he has a biased opinion on certain narratives which is quite understandable since Indian kingdoms and the subcontinent has been invaded quite a lot so the perception of a native and an invader changes for individuals . I don't think he means to change narratives though but he is a lot better than a blind right winger or a liberal marxist. It's the same for european history imo.
A lot of people try to resonance over his viewpoints and wisdom because most he summarizes stuff quite well for the common layman, I don't blame them for suggesting you his videos XD.
Do they suggest you stuff through discord or the youtube community?
If so I would also like to contribute sometimes.
@@zuzanareacts
Aww, thank you so much for sharing! History major friends. I always liked history but you know as I got older I think it's because I'm very spiritual and I like things that are unexplained. Good to hear that he is good at Indian history - I'd have hoped he would.
You make me think I should start Discord but right now I'm not able to manage all the challenges.
I have a spreadsheet: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tW7ENVuG7uMSYQsMp94m1s5xzNIUW1A8dzfGv_f2mPs/edit#gid=0
You can add your comments there - it's not editable but you can add comments. I don't want to lose any recommendations, haha.
Thank you so much for the support = means a lot!
@@zuzanareacts He is exactly sharing his perspectives unexplained by most
That silk route nowadays cpec must be controlled by INDIANS
Mongols even destroyed Roman empire
Introducing bakcgroundmusic 😂😂😂😂😂 in his each live show was .......😂😂. I hear his lots of his show. You know the thing which you hearing today I was heared most of them almost one two year ago.but good that you eager to gain.👏👏👏👏👏
Intersting.
Finally a video worth reacting to
Hey Dear, any thought on hiring a video editor and shorts producer?
I'd have to first make money with the channel to afford it. I can tell you this is miles away right now. Everyone thinks YT people have money, you start having money when you reach 1M subs until then - it's all your own money and resources and I spent I think already a good 7k GBP just on this channel. For now, it's a hobby, if it grows, I will see.
@@zuzanareacts Not selling anything. But I have few suggestions for you regarding growth. how should tell you.
So sit here n fact checking him ......u got d audacity to belittle him ,DUDE chill u r nobody just see d video n make notes IT'LL BE EASY FOR U TO REPORT TO UR MASTERS.....chill
Let me not talk about history or science or astronomy, I'll ask you a simple question "Can you visualize what's happening right now on the road parallel to the road you stay in or are present at? And the answer will talk about human limitation. Since you talk of multiple possibilities and not one can be accepted than the other, Let me ask you another question "Can you see the possibility of gauging the thoughts occuring in an animal's mind?". That's the limitations yet trying to proove that you're wrong and I'm not. Pointless.
Why Persians never invaded India, why Babylonians never inaded India, why Assyrians never invaded India, Why Hittites never invades India, why Alexander turned back at the gateway of India ?
My guess is that some mystical forces forgotten by the history were protecting the Indus people, and all other neighbouring empires of the ancient civilized world knew the consequences of crossing that red line.
I presume we will never know unless we learn how to jump through time 🙈
@@zuzanareacts Very unfortunate it is.
I feel lot more need to be unearthed about ancient Indo Europeans, especially Scythians.
Because in ancient times Indians were ruled by Blue coloured extra terrestrials with extra terrestrial technologies and sacred cow grids over India.
May be because India provided a lot of trade and produced lot of agricultural products, why destroy that setting, in most wars you have to convince the soldiers why you are going to war.
U r looking more better day after day ... Yeah 👁️👁️😃🥰
😊 thanks
Pls dear react to keep kings and general mongol empire
Hey Zuzana, Happy Friday and weekend to you
thank you! to you, too!
Absolute baseless and highly hallucinating abhijit...
Please be wary of this guy called chavda. He's not a historian nor a political analyst. He makes videos for fanatic Indians who lap up all this kind of content. Mongols didn't invade India because of Himalayas. Not because Indians were brave or anything like that
thank you for sharing this with me.
amother bhimta spotted
There's no Himalayas in the western borders😂 dummy
Shut the fk up... Out here making claims and not proving him wrong shows how y'all are really blank in ur mind
When you say something incorrect you should mention specifics with facts from original sources. General statements are just to satisfy self ego
yes - I agree but also facts need to be not only understood to be correct but also be evaluated correctly in the context
@@zuzanareactsyeah so do it then don't make general statement.. We would like to see your counter and not just labeling someone wrong
Very informative
Because of mongiji
Very interesting! 🇮🇳
Wow 😮😮 eye opener
Abhijit chavda is a great teacher
I don't have interest in history as much as in studying, comparing and contrasting culture and values and natural instincts as humans. Nevertheless I somehow watched this video and I could appreciate it.
Glad you did :)
Buddhism isn't the form of Hinduism.
Buddhism is the oldest religion of India.
I think maybe people in the comments would disagree. I cannot confirm one way or the other, I didn't study this in depth.
@@zuzanareacts
There are some few basic questions which arose if they claim Hinduism as oldest.
1. If Hinduism was oldest religion and that too before Indus valley civilization why they didn't able to decode the script of Indus valley or if they say that Sanskrit is oldest script than y indus people didn't use it.
2.Samrat Asoka also didn't mention anything about Hinduism and even he didn't use Sanskrit instead he use prakrit or Pali script in his inscription.
3.If Hinduism was that old than y many archaeological evidences shows artefacts related to Buddha in India and its neighbouring countries.
4. If Hinduism is oldest than y they were not able to spread their religion much earlier than Buddhism.
5.Hinduism is a branch of Vajrayan Buddhism many dieties of vajrayan Buddhism are copied by them given different name and label them as their own.
interesting - I appreciate you sharing@@tps8323
@@tps8323Hello.. Firstly correct your History.. Who Was Bhuddisht? What was his real name? Where was born, which religion?.. Bhuddha real name is Siddhartha Gautama born to a king in Nepal which was a part of Ancient Bharat.. When Nepal is a Hindu country then how come Nepal is not a Bhuddisht country 😂.. also Sidhartha got enlightenment in UP currently in India then he got the Bhuddha name.. Before becoming Bhuddha he met Rishis they were Sanatan Rishis he asked Rishi how to get answers to these questions which i have then the Rishi said to him to do the meditation , that's when he started Meditation in Bhodi Gaya currently in India and got Bhuddha name.. also the people who followed Bhuddha and his teachings started calling themselves Bhuddisht that's the story.. and many invaders came and destroyed so many things and so many rishis, Gurukuls and many other Institutes and universities.. Firstly Islamic invaders then British Colonization almost 1000 years we lost so many important documents and many ancestors, Gurus, Teachers died.. you need to learn books not the WhatsApp forwarded messages 😂
@@zuzanareacts he's a so called Buddhist who convert to Buddhism to fight and eradicate Hinduism because of the caste system
Their typical argument :
1. Buddhism is older than Hinduism
2. Hinduism is all about caste system
3. Hindus destroyed Buddhism in the subcontinent ( well we all know who actually did that )
The lower caste has reservations in practically every field 50% of all seats are reserved for the lower caste
He might pretend like a Buddhist but he's gonna write Hindu in the religion column to claim the reservations 😂😂
Nice video thanks with best wishes for you
Thank you too
First 💖
Trade
🕉️🙏
Great video ☺️
❣️❣️❣️
Bharat chill India is also good 😂😂
Mongol invade two times,,, but alauddin khilji king of Hindustan
he was a savage p!G
He was a coward ...idiot like most muslims
Because there were a great muslim emperor in India already
G.khan is the father of the mughal
I watched her reaction when he talked about Europe, her reaction when he named Churchill, her words that he is bias about Europian History, her eagerness to comment in comment box where someone called him a fake historian or someone supported Europians favourite thing "Anti-Indian Mindset" 😏
After all of above, I thought she is a historian and scrolled downed her channel but I found that her channel is a reaction channel. 🫥🫥
I don't agree with him on Europe (I watched some of his videos where his assumptions - the current situation were purely wrong) and I think I'm entitled to my opinion. Hence, since I've seen that - I've become rather sceptical but I'd hope he is correct about Indian history. It's like me sitting here in Slovakia - studying India from afar and making conclusions on what's happening - chances are I may get things wrong. Yes, clearly some people share my views and see what I see. The majority don't - did I commit a treason for having a different opinion? The comment about the anti-Indian mindset is a joke - if I was anti-India I'd start a channel for anti-India - correction I wouldn't care as I''m not a hater ......
Yes, this is a reaction channel and I did study history but to be a teacher of history not to be a person that sits in archives and does history if that makes sense.
@@zuzanareactsAgain making general statement and not providing prove or facts to back up ur arguement... Maybe you dont like to hear your real history of Europe and suddenly act so defensive...