Cheating the Prisoner's Dilemma
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- An explanation of the Prisoner's Dilemma, Nash Equilibrium, and the Infinite Prisoner's Dilemma.
🔔 Subscribe for more stories: www.youtube.co...
📚 My 3 favorite Machine Learning books:
• Deep Learning With Python, Second Edition - amzn.to/3xA3bVI
• Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow - amzn.to/3BOX3LP
• Machine Learning with PyTorch and Scikit-Learn - amzn.to/3f7dAC8
Twitter: / svpino
Disclaimer: Some of the links included in this description are affiliate links where I'll earn a small commission if you purchase something. There's no cost to you.
people can't be turned into mathmatical forumlas - people's morals and strenght of character are never taken into account with these sort of puzzles and the fact that both of the prisoners might have previously talked about this situation, have decided neither talks, trust each other implicitly, and neither talks because of that, is never taken into account.
The incentive to talk to the police is just too strong to trust other people. That's why this works.
Amazing content!! Thank you
Glad you liked it!
I today only was thinking you didn't uploaded in a while and then you uploaded 🤩
Ha! There you have it 😁
I can't see comments, some Nash equilibrium probably
Yes
@@underfitted Good video, remember meeting a student with prisoner dilemma stories pre-internet, now I see their context.
Thanks for the upload
No problem!
7:00 I don't understand. Following this logic from step 1 then no one ever talks. Or ok let's admit that this step 2 happens, then it will forever be "one talks on step n, the other talks on step n+1". But you cannot end up with "both talk at step 3".
You are correct, this was a quick illustration but it won’t happen as it shows there. Hopefully the explanation after that was clear
@@underfitted It was :)