Everything Wrong With the Science of Lucy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- Full disclosure: I really enjoyed watching this movie, despite making fun of it. This is one of the most fun times I've had making a video and modeling off of such a fun channel like Cinema Sins.
----------
This is a special episode for our 500 subscriber landmark. We thought this episode would be a fun way to relate some of what we know in neuroscience and psychology to other areas such as pop culture and entertainment. This episode explores everything wrong with the Neuroscience and science of the 2014 Movie Lucy.
Created by: Amanda Cortex
Edited by: Aaron Amygdala
Patreon Producer: John Posser
Logo: (PAN) www.ProgActNet.com
----------
Support BBF by becoming a patron on Patreon: / briefbrainsnacks
----------
Brief Brain Facts:
Facebook: / bbrainfacts
Twitter: / briefbrainsnack
Instagram: / briefbrainsnacks
--------
Sources:
[Add Sources]
Full disclosure: I really enjoyed watching this movie, despite making fun of it. This is one of the most fun times I've had making a video and modeling off of such a fun channel like Cinema Sins.
For more scientific videos, check out the rest of my channel!
Props for hiding very well that you liked the movie
Your video is trash
Evan Butler How come?
What do you think you’re the most genius lady in the earth ! Science and physics is the result of imagination and stop being making fun of it or find out the faults. It’s just a movie not a science or quantum mechanics seminar. The concept they used is really appreciable. It can excite the mind of enthusiasts
I didn’t get how they explained that a bigger brain usage can lead to us controling matter, is it just like *magic* or is there some science fiction in it (like is it based on some science phenomenon)? Thank you so much for making this video bc this movie confuses the hell out of me
she died on the basement floor cus of drugs
all 80% of this movie is her hallucinations
Yes! That’s the most likely scenario.
Before death, that is.
How can she hallucinate about what she doesn't know? Feel smart now?
Good theory
That actually makes more sense.
Mom: “what do you want to be when you grow up?”
Lucy: “a usb”
This got me giggling
Very funny
😆😆😆
@@BriefBrainSnacks ❤️
it's just a movie, calm down
Agreed. She is Angry.... Darwinism can't answer everything. She has a young limited perspective on life. When She's 60 she''ll be smarter.
@@kevinrickey3925like your one to talk.
It’s called entertainment buddy
On sin 29, she killed the guy while having surgery because it was gonna seed up the process and she said he would've died anyways and that they couldn't have saved them, remember? She looked at the brain scans to make sure she wouldn't just kill some dude that could've been fine.
Then why did she needed a sergen to take out the packet? She took out bullet already during fight with goons while coming out to prison remember 😉
She could save him, since she can do everything
@@pietro93vitnot at 28%
My question in Lucy movie is that if Dolphin can use 20% of it's brain then why the fucking hell didn't they colonized us 😂😂😂😂
When they saw our grammar, they chose to leave us alone.
Also when she first contact to doctor her brain was already achieved 28%of capacity and she was asking a 10% brain capacity doctor what to do?😂
If the brain didn't filter information, we'd quickly go mad.
I couldn't understand why she had no empathy whatsoever. She was just robotic, and brutally violent.
Too many gaps about her "powers"and how they were used..sheeesh
it was explained that she felt no emotions the more of her brain capacity she unlocked
"This is how I talk when I'm high" hahahha I'm fricken dead. Great job with this
Lol. This was a great re-appropriation of the CinemaSins format.
Totally worth it too.
I studied molecular biology and did a fair share of research in it. That's why I found it difficult at times to look over all that weird pseudo-scientific non-sense. But then again it didn't hold me back from actually admiring how great the movie is apart from that.
LUCY IS LIKE LIMITLESS ON STEROIDS
It's a science fiction action flick, typically not very concerned with reality (which is obviously not surprising) but at least it's kind of fun to watch.
Throughout all of this all I felt was that somebody is more jealous, than mad at the movie.
My thoughts also 🙂
She's even wrong about quite a few points. Like asking "how would you know what the result of 40% cerebral capacity would lead to" when in the next few frames he specifically says it's a hypothesis. Or saying that instinctual tendencies can't be passed down genetically, yet those things are factored into the environmental pressures she herself mentioned. Or "she killed a man in the middle of surgery but left this one alive" she specifically explains in the movie that the tumor in the patient had already infiltrated the spine and that they would die anyways, and throughout the whole movie, I don't think she killed anyone that either commits violence against her, or was going to die soon anyways.
@@gobblesnot where does his hypothesis come from? Let me guess: the writer's a*s. The only reason he wrote something as stupid as that is because it sounds cool (if you have no ideia how the brain actually works).
She didn't say tendencies. She said fears, language, cultural knowledge. Are you saying any of that is passed down by the genes? If so, oh boy! You shouldn't have abandoned school.
Before the talk with the Mob's boss, she had just killed five guys. Also, he was responsible for all the violence she has suffered till them, so yeah, you have no point at all.
If you don't want to read/study in order to learn about this topic, just talk to any neuroscientist about the movie. Any of them will they you how stupid the movie is.
I feel that people wouldn’t be so arbitrarily critical if she were a man.
Just because it’s a hypothesis doesn’t mean it’s a good question lmfao. She is questioning the premise of the question. It literally makes no sense and provides no guide for how to measure the outcome. That’s not what a hypothesis is
It's funny how she complained about the echolocation stuff but skipped its scene
You have never taken drugs have you. She does feel pain, but she no longer reacts to pain in the normal way. When she says she doesn't feel certain things she means she doesn't relate to her emotions the way a normal person does. This is the drug culture side of the movie. Most questions like why she eats the germy food, or not clearing everyone off the road when she drives. She had less than 24 hours. She made mistakes, which would make sense since all her brain was calculating was the ultimate questions. She wanted to figure "it" out all of "it" the universe and all, but she was going to die soon. She left the main baddy alive presumably as a back up for more CPH4 or had calculated that killing him then would be useless as he could only feel pain, he could not feel what she wanted him to feel, empty and disappointed. Yes the main baddy almost got her but that almost then die is probably worth it to a super genius. Oh yeah the time issue, she is not taking about classical time, and she isn't discussing relativistic time in the discussion with Freedman. Your explanation is therefore just as non-scientific. They are discussing a general problem with math, proving that number 1 is true. We can prove almost any other number but the number 1.
The movie is a misrepresentation of science though. The terms that would have made sense in the movie were probably left out and made the movie highly inaccurate by dumbing down the language. The idea the Morgan is discussing is not brain capacity, but communicative limitations. That is, if one could control their bio chemistry then one could probably have full control over their body. He carries this to the realm of the neuron, since that is biochemically simpler than an entire human body. If the information stored by the cell on its own metabolism and its own reproductive processes could be communicated to the human brain in such away that the brain could alter the cells' mechanism based on the direct information is gets from the cells then this is what we would see. But that is impossible, because the frequency of cell communication is much higher than frequencies that we use. That is a cell is saying more with less, so we would require more time to comprehend the message from a cell as opposed to that of a person. Now set that to having to listen to all the cells in your body and you understand why the process doesn't work like that.
What makes the bran similar to a computer is computation, or using arithmetic and logic to manipulate data. Scientists usually use super computers to run calculations too big or too complex for the human brain. Since Lucy has uncovered many unknown methods of computation, we can think that Lucy is a next generation of computer since she has already gone beyond human and beyond technology that we understand currently. For years they will study the information she has left behind and design computers that are based on Lucy. So what is Morgan makes light of the fact that she is beyond next gen computing, he still gets the dumbed down point across.
I thought you would criticize the science not the language usage.
She said herself that she didn’t feel pain. So, I’m only saying this is the case based on the words that she spoke. 😕
@@BriefBrainSnacks .....after two years and this is what i see yet again on youtube, another petty reviewer somehow miss all the marks to hit the right tone, whiny & all the usual crap of an opinionated big logic jockey. Cause someone in the internet use better comprehension, grasp of subject, deductive reasoning on something like a fantasy movie which you so tried to be so serious upon....which even the movie isn't so intentionall. If that wasn't the case the director be making documentary about human brain subject to satisfy your scientifica penchant. About as good as cinemasins, another stupid that exist on youtube.
this might be the longest yt comment i’ve ever seen, i hope you’ve gone outside since u posted this
@@19Ronny Gone outside flew to some new countries and read my comment with the same level of cringe you did Lol.
@@laughinggooner4271think its pretty accurate
You'd think her being hyper sensitive would make pain worse
0:01 - 11:25
Ok. So is this supposed to be a comedy?
what scared me more is that she absorbed matter and turned into a flashdrive
sin 32, she ate fast because it's faster and she even ate in the first place so she wouldn't need to worry about needing food and water.
If Morgan Freeman says something it must be true
He makes everything sound so believable 🤣
I think the main purpose of this movie was to have a fun ride with over the top abilities. Basically a superhero movie. All the scientific bs is just there to provide a quick explanation to drive Lucy's story. It is inconsistent, but there is only so much you can do with 1h 29m. And trying to make sense to all its fallacies would have slowed the movie down drastically. I think this movie did exactly what it aimed to do; be an enjoyable, fast paced, over the top action sci-fi thriller. Of course that's not everyone's cup of tea, but I'm a sucker for these movies.
Man, the majority of "sins" in the video are because of things YOU didn't like, not because of what can or cannot be true, Lucy said she felt how all the things that make her human were dissappearing so she started doing things more efficiently, you simply got lost on the interpretation of every scene on the movie, you have to start looking at things from different points of view.
It is called a Sci-fi movie.
🤡
Welcome to Cinema Sins
Exactly
You are such an ignorant, they should not permit you on the internet
7:04 omg. i thought i only knew about how dumb this scene is. haha
serious question.
do you understand that this is a science fiction film?
you making a point that the film has unrealistic scenes is the same as making a point that a comedy film has funny scenes in it.
Lets just agree, ok. This movie is dumb. The fictional science in it is dumb. Sooo dumb. The very premise of it is dumb. I love science fiction but this is botton of the barrel quality. It's fun, i can give you that, but definitely stupid.
it's a sci fi film, it's supposed to be that way..
a dumb, good, silly or bad movie is regardless to my point.
you can't complain that a sci fi film is too *unrealistic* especially when the scenes she comments about are beyond impossible and therefore not possible to know or not know if it really is over the top or not 😁
So not scientifically accurate... but at least its historical accurate.
Hahaha Zac. Don't make me come over there!
I wonder how pure science fiction movie can be historically accurate.
Daniel Jakistam Upload based off current technology and where it will go and what is possible according to the technology advancing.
No it’s not 🤣🤣🤣
Wait, what? Where do we learn that the one scientist was the one who killed his own daughter?
This was SO GREAT!!! I loved it!
Thanks! It's been one of the most fun to make!
U are aware this movie isnt supposed to have real science?
Funnily enough, many people disagreeing here are contentious about the science, as if the movie's "science" actually made sense. Way more people are taking this movie seriously than you actually know. Also, reverting your point:
U are aware that the review is supposed to be about real science?
I thought they were going to go in, this is how gods come into existence ..not, this is how the new Mac books are born, direction.
What I like about this movie, is anytime I try and throw science at some scenes or try and act like "oh thats just impossible" like the laptops on the airplane, I circle back around to the realization that if her brain is operating at a completely inhuman level, its within the realm of possibility that she can design her own OS in a moments glance that is designed to support her intelligence. Also, the laws of science that we know today, may very well be inaccurate because of the way she explains why are laws are wrong at the end of the movie. We've created these laws of matter and science to allow us to break things down to a level of understanding that our brain can handle.
Yes and no, most of it - is - impossible in the way it's shown, and that's typically how scifi goes, the goals are almost never actually impossible, but the ways they supposedly achieve them are.
The brain percentage thing for instance-- we know for 100% sure that's not even how brains work to begin with.
But on what of science we know is missing, it's the math, not exactly the facts. There are huge holes in physics, and we can't tell why, there are two versions of reality we can test and see, but we can't connect them. Something is definitely missing, but it's more like a set of functions than a whole nother universe of possibilities.
Though the drug isnt real, the chemical the drug is based on is real.
Well, the real CPH4 is a enzyme found in bacteria, not in drugs.
I know you have to have a video but did you forget that Morgan himself said all of his theory is just an idea and hypothetical without any basis also throughout all the movie you are just digging for sins
Yeah, I think she just wants to make the movie 100% scientifically correct so she disregards that the movie doesn't want to be 100% correct nor is it supposed to be
That's actually worth 10 sins.
No scientist works with 'just an idea' without prove and data. The symposium scene is pure nonsense.
The part that discredits the whole movie is when it assumes we dont use our full "cerebral capacity", that and everything after is complete nonsense and fiction.
well the whole ideas wrong we already use 100 percent of our brain every part is use
Morgan Freeman was just reading a script written by someone else (Luc Besson). It is difficult to take the video creator seriously as a scientist when they are trying to discredit the ACTORS’ words. 😳 Not to mention the phrase “scientific sins” is loaded with controversy.
Why didn’t you break down the part where she went back to the beginning of the universe and witnessed the Big Bang?
The need to survive is not the equal to desire. Her body breaks apart from excessive use so limits telekinesis. And the ability to turn of brain receptors to pain would be a survival skill not equivalent to all feeling is gone.
Beyond that the movie gets outrageous, echolocation can work on hearing people's organs and physical states as well.
And the part where she’s talking about how she accessed this information, she never said that her ability made it possible, she’s saying that’s what she used to acquire the information.
Someone seems to take science-FICTION movies a little too seriously. This is like someone getting triggered over the science in matrix or inception. Just enjoy the movie for what it is.
I know right?
If genetics doesn't contain or pass down memories, how does "generational trauma" work?
Bruh 🤦♀️
I knew this movie was dumb as hell without ever actually having seen it, but even just what you've summarized here manages to limbo beneath those already low expectations like Ben Shapiro walking through a pet door.
We didn’t have high expectations going into this movie. So, nothing surprised nor disappointed. We will maintain that this movie should have been a comedy and not taken itself so seriously. Oh well. Missed opportunity there Luc Besson.
It’s dumb as hell that you criticize this movie without watching it lol. Watch the movie before agreeing with someone else’s thoughts and opinions. This movie never stated that it’s based on scientific facts.
Yeah scarlet is so dam fine in this movie how dare you 😂😂 it’s a good movie and who are we to say that this movie couldn’t be realistic. We’ve never had the capability to access 100% of our brains so we wouldn’t really know what the outcome could be so calling it unrealistic is very false because anything could be Realistic since we’ve yet to have a human being access 100% capability
@@spiritualphenomenon2413that’s not how human brains work idiot. All existing research and data shows that we use 100% of our brains.
6:52 she saw the patient's brain scan. Brain tumor. Incurable.
Incurable, unless you have the power to control matter itse--
Oh waaaaaaaait...
(And if anyone asks, "Well, how was she supposed to know she could fix this guy's tumor when she was only at only 20% brain capacity?" then I get to ask *you* "Well, how did she know what an incurable tumor looks like on an x-ray without ever having seen one before? 20% brain capacity or not, that knowledge still has to come from *somewhere.*")
Eve is the first woman
I strongly believed this theory and without further knowledge I had a twitter war about this and now I really feel stupid
Love this comment 😂
Lmao 😂
I just love how people who created this movie just thought of big and smart words and said most of our viewers are stupid so they are gonna believe it's actual information
lol she ate those foods with blood cause she can now understand that human body need to eat and pain and other feelings was just stopping us to make everything better remember this is a movie not a real life scenario just enjoy the movie
lmao......ikr
That’s dumb as hell.
I really like your reaction to this movie. I had a lot fun.😅 It happens to be one of my favorite movie. I have seen it many times. That last saying "I am everywhere." It has a deep meaning for me just because who said to me.
thanks for the video :)
i enjoyed the film so much (another movie, "limitless", is basically the same idea)
they just had to say "using functions at the same time" about % of the brain (in order to not be misleading).
and using 10% of our brain function at the same time seems crazy at first glance.
but, watching a video make us (if no dysfunctions):
_ hear multiple frequencies
_ remove some frequencies seen as disturbance wiped by our brain (you know, that regular noise, as a fridge can produce. when you hear it during a long time the brain learns to avoid noticing it even if our hearing system still capture it)
_ viewing multiple color zones
_ balance our body
_ keep breath active
_ keep neural cells of digestive system active too (the only ones that aren't in the brain in fact)
_ muscles that are still contracted (otherwise filling pants ?) need brain activity too
as you can see, there is many parallel neural activity listed here, and this list ins't meant to be complete...
"..I'm not going to explain.." -How scientific of you.
9:50 it honestly looks like she's allied with an invasive alien species.
I wouldn’t have minded the video and was actually looking forward to it but the tone of your voice just turned me off it.. not sure what it is but you just have this obnoxiousness about the way u talk about stuff u don’t agree with
That’s, like, your opinion, man. 🤷🏽♀️
Agreed
I think the review wasn't quite properly evaluated. There are substantial explanations for every sin maybe except five. You just have to really read up on your parapsychology to fully understand.
You nailed the Cinema Sins formula down to a T XD
again you didnt continue the part she says she can feel anything she means the peoples thoughts and feelings the circulation of the earth and the universe and anything and because shes geniuse she knows that pain can only stop us to think at the movie
they says that at 20% you can have a full control over your body it means you can control every single dna neurons and anything inside your body so she can now control body reaction including enduring pain
You watched and examined the whole movie, for sure! But in the end, you said "please Don't say everywhere, please Don't.... F***.". Well, that is a drama you had to put on despite of already knowing the ending. The same drama has been put on to the film to entertain audience. Thank you!
Her favorite word: fu**
Ps: Always remember that it’s just a movie where not everything is logical. And breathe in and out. 😉🤪😜😎
Love from the year 2022
Next you should make a video about how the Smurfs is fake. You could talk about how the mushrooms would die from the construction process, and how rare blue is as a color in land mammals etc.etc.
Lucy < Limitless
ah just saw in the special featurette he made it part real and part fantasy to make it enjoyable
A few of those gave me a chuckle. Thanks. I will say this evolution should never take billions of years✝️
It is very funny how cerebral capacity allows you to control things outside of your body without even touching it.
You kindly skip the scene where she went back in time and saw things that pre-dated human kind. That would make your list even longer.
Thanks for the laugh.
Whatever we think will definitely become real tomorrow, it happens is past also.
I'm a Patron which means I saw it before all of you! *nah-nah-nah-nah-nah-naaaaaaaaaah*. Yeah she puts her foot in one of my favorite films but science is science, yo! LOL. Great video!
We ❤️ our patrons and are glad you got to enjoy this episode before everyone else. Thank you for watching and your support. For science! ✌️❤️🧠
These poor ppl in the comments don't understand the difference between criticism and complete hatred.
Movie Maker should consider all viewer are not completely idiot
Actually Darwin was not taken seriously at first, so that part in the movie is correct.
I still enjoy this movie, even after half a dozen viewings.
I have a good imagination.
Movies like this aren't for halfwits, they don't like having to watch & think at the same time! 🤣
imagine picking a part a fictional movie about a girl being a bad ass cuz she uses 100% of her brain. The movie isnt supposed to be super serious
3:30
actually, Darwin wasn't popular to his contemporaries.
His theory still remains.
It is a movie. It was FICTION.
I was looking for a video exactly like this
I thought so many of the exact same things lol
But there is an ‘ultimate form’ that could survive and be capable of any/everything
Didn't we learn that trauma is passed on?
I totally agree with you. About movie i just want to say that its a good entertaining movie but the facts you noticed are the facts what i also have noticed too while watching this movie... human body is beyond the time and the science. but only if then it's fully unlocked to it's potential in other way. not the way like it would shown in the movie...
Your review was much worse than the movie.
Everything about this movie I loved but one thing didn’t make sense. If everything is evaluated and measured by only time (as I understand that math and language is only a simplify for humans to understand certain things and a measure of things) then how did she time travel? I mean think about it. If time is truly the only real law of everything then how can you change the time. That’s changing the universe itself that created her. Unless the unlimited universes that exist, the other universes have different timelines and she traveled to those universes seeing the different timelines. As that point she wasn’t “everywhere” so it’s a really interesting to me by that part how she would simply time travel. This is the only thing I find wrong with the movie. But this guy who made this video doesn’t understand the word theory, everything else made sense for this movie.
At the end of the day we all prove and play under theory
I enjoyed the movie because it was food for thought. The movie actually took 10 years, on and off, to write so obviously by the time it was finished science had progressed in it's theories. Please also consider that a great many of our abilities and traits are not lesarned - they are passed on by epigenetics - from our family tree. A lot of studies show how memories and traumas from our ancestors are activated in siblings in later generations. Example: African elephants now being born without tusks (memories necessary for survival, handed down from ancestors).
nah thats just natural selection elephants with small tusk are born becuse the elephants with big tusks get killed of before they get a chance to reproduce so elelphants with small tusks are now coming more and more common.
do you have any evidence for the claim that many abilities aren’t learned?
Knowledge isn’t passed down by genetics dude.
Well snotty one, I have studied Particle Physics for many years... And Evolution is conjecture, in some cases the worst kind of tripe, yet you embrace it without criticism. That said, what was passed on as fact by the writer, is just fiction and made for a good tale. Johanssen(sp?) is a superb actress who carried the less than a sterling script and made the movie fun for me.
Can we see you heap praise on a film (or just discuss it) in a long form video for Science Fiction you do like?
We have a couple of video game reviews where we’ve done exactly that. Check out this one where we explain where they absolutely nailed it regarding psychosis: ruclips.net/video/NxyEwNHn85c/видео.html
The saddest part of this video are the comment section, I refuse to believe humanity can be so damn stupid and apriciate this movie.
Your video is great, ignore this internet bs, you are objectively right in each point.
Euron being euron
Ngl I really liked this movie. I thought it was really cool even though it was bs. Btw this was a really cool video. Really good parody of cinema sins
Shin I really liked this movie too. It made my 2014💀 I’m kinda triggered by the vid cause she’s ruining the illusion i had in my mind
@@weirritatin8187 felt
It was the first r rated movie to use imax camera
I thought what they were saying was true when I was a kid
Há que se ter cuidado ao analisar filmes de ficção científica. Até hoje não tivemos um "Hall" previsto em 2001 do ano de 1968. Star Wars e Star Trek que o digam! Matrix e Avatar passeiam por esse mesmo caminho perigoso. E tem ainda "de volta para o futuro" com a impossível viagem no tempo. A proposta do filme Lucy é interessante e o roteiro caminha de forma fluida e faz o filme valer a pena.
Darwin is still considered a fool.
Ironically, I think Superman did a better interpretation of taking in the world’s information and appropriating living on earth with human better.
I think it just makes the concept a fairer mark.
Another funny thing is, did this concept take from Mob Psycho 100 or the other way around?
LUCKY was seen for a long time as the MISSING LINK or at least the closest thing to it. So on a level of tabloid popular science it was NOT WRONG !
3:39 Fine Point !
6:17 WEARD EATING HABITS; STRESS AND GUN POINT ACTION - right on the money !! but then we had no Action Movie anymore - what the director wanted ::) Compare this one to Luc Besson´s( LA FEMME) NIKITA - this one here comes over almost like a remake :) and I don´t mean the American remake POINT OF NO RETURN ( in German: CODENAME: NIKITA )
Towards the end a very well done critical review.
Maan I hate this kinda video format, yet I am here! I wish people just appreciate the art and the story and not shit on it. If people had this attitude regarding Vincent van gogh painting...
The movie is bullshit
Who made you watch?
OK, so for the sake of discussion: I know dolphins are smart, but if they used "20% of cerebral capacity", so more than humans use, wouldn't they develop a conventional language, to teach humans? 🙄 Anyway, is a great Sci-fi movie.
For goodness sake, its movie which part of that don't you understand.
Yea the whole you can became god or close to it because you unlocked the ability is bs ,don't get me wrong it's a fun movie but it feels like it's something out of a video game
This movie is not inaccurate if technology and ai keep on advancing and will not stop we could become a god it would take centuries or decades but technology and artificial intelligence advances exponentially.
youre not a scientist are you
?
8:19 the idea is that she controls matter. i dont think youve understood this movie at all
Thank you for this video
I think I would enjoy watching this movie more than listening to this girl (the movie analyzer). This is just a movie. and we all know movies are mostly made believe. I would give this a DISLIKE. But I love the movie itself.
So, umm! Why did you copy CinemaSins's video format?
Of course it's a comedy. It's Bresson.
Its a movie not a science article
like this one a lot
I’m glad you enjoyed.
at first I wondered if that was amanda with a blonde wig
😄 I feel like science fiction and science fact get blurred. To me it seemed like Luc Besson was attempting to make his own Matrix, even using the empty white space visual and all the fun shootouts. It kind of follows the heroes journey story structure but Lucy is no hero. This highlighted the major flaw of the movie and that was the unjustified and indiscriminate killing. Or is the revelation that existence itself is cold and devoid of empathy? And maybe Lucy represents AI and doesn't care about human life if it happens to be in the way? Either way it felt wrong. For a much better Luck Besson movie I recommend The Professional.