Ape Expert Rates 10 Monkey And Ape Attacks In Movies And TV | How Real Is It | Insider
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 май 2024
- Primatologist Mireya Mayor breaks down 10 monkey and ape attacks in movies, such as "King Kong," based on realism.
Mayor debunks common misconceptions about the behavior and appearance of the great apes, such as the brutish strength and massive size of the gorilla-like ape, King Kong, in "King Kong" (2005), with Jack Black and Naomi Watts; the violent rampage of Gordy the Chimpanzee in "Nope," starring Daniel Kaluuya, Steven Yeun, and Keke Palmer; and the intelligence and communication skills of chimpanzees and bonobos in both "Dawn of the Planet of the Apes" and "Rise of the Planet of the Apes," with James Franco. She looks at the realism of monkey and ape attacks against humans and other animals, such the plausibility of a reptile-like Godzilla fighting an ape-like Kong in "Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire"; the fight between a gorilla and leopard in "Tarzan" (1999); and the mandrills attacking humans in "Jumanji: The Next Level," starring Dwayne Johnson, Kevin Hart, and Awkwafina. Mayor also breaks down the evolution of ape and monkeys, such as the common ancestor of humans and apes, the hominin, in "2001: A Space Odyssey"; the Gigantopithecus in "The Jungle Book" (2016); and the capuchin monkey in "Night at the Museum," with Ben Stiller.
Mayor is a primatologist and explorer who has gone on expeditions to study apes and monkeys such as mountain gorillas, western lowland gorillas, and the white-faced saki monkey. She is a wildlife correspondent for National Geographic, where she was also part of a research expedition that discovered a new species of lemur, considered to be the world's smallest primate. She wrote the book "Pink Boots and a Machete: My Journey From NFL Cheerleader to National Geographic Explorer," with a foreword by Jane Goodall. She is also the executive director for strategic projects and events and director of public policy events at Florida International University.
You can follow Mireya here:
www.mireyamayor.com/
/ mireyamayor
------------------------------------------------------
Insider's mission is to inform and inspire.
Visit our homepage for the top stories of the day: www.businessinsider.com/
Insider on Facebook: / insider
Insider on Instagram: / insider
Insider on Twitter: / thisisinsider
Insider on Snapchat: / 2708030621
Insider on TikTok: / insider
Ape Expert Rates 10 Monkey And Ape Attacks In Movies And TV | How Real Is It | Insider
"a very accurate depiction, however i dont like the movie 0/10"
her credibility is lost
@@folarinosibodushe only said that because she didn’t like that they used real monkeys in the movie
@@tobiasedwards2643 They actually didn’t, it was all CGI!
**cough** stereotypes **cough**
@@TheRealDismantler I’m talking about Night at The Museum.
Clearly an expert but she’s not rating any of this on realism just how much she likes the film.
Expert on feelz.
Shes not even a expert, she thinks a chimp could be an adult human male. Chimps are pound for pound 1.5 times stronger, whats the weight difference between a human male that is physically good vs a normal chimp?
Also, in the POTA movies she isn’t taking into account the virus that affected the behavior of the apes and Cesar. In the movies the gorillas are the protectors/muscle, the chimps are the hunters and workers, and the orangutans are the teachers.
These expert react things are so weird. Like obviously King Kong is too big to be a real ape, that's not the point.
Not really. He is too big to climb the building. She gives about the real size of a gorilla. How real is it ? Gorillas are not prone to attack people, but he jumped on the airplane. King Kong is not real. What do you want more ?
😂😂😂😂
Lmaooo mad cuz the expert said that’s not realistic is the weird take
I wish you would rate it on the accuracy not her emotions/opinions
Seriously, the chimp attack was literally based on an irl attack on a human.
Giving it a zero is just denying reality.
Exactly! This isn't the first guest that's done this, but I found this person annoying
I feel the Dr. rated it in accuracy, not emotion.
@workout1302 Yes, I agree. The context of the movie needs to be considered though. I saw another guest saying that a sequence is not accurate but acknowledged it's a film. He liked one of his lowest rated scenes because he enjoyed watching it
She was the one rating it.
How real is it: I disagree with the message so 0/10
Insider doesn't usually swing and miss with their guests. This guest was a big whiff.
Mayor's Rubric:
Apes Good: 10
Apes Bad: 0
Totally biased. Just look up real ape attacks, and you'll be mindblown of what they'll do.
The worst injuries I've heard of humans inflicting on other humans without tools were amputation of nose, fingers, nipples, lips, genitalia, even a pulled out womb. However, such cases are few and far between and we have almost 8 billion humans and will report on any such horrific attack.
Chimpanzees on the other hand will dish out such injuries on a regular basis...
She gave Nope a 0/10 but does she know that a chimp actually mauled a woman’s face in real life?
And then she gives Tarzan 10/10 😭??
I'm glad u made that point about that woman who got attacked by her friends chimp
the attack was unique and unusual and the result of Travis's lifelong abuse and isolation. He was also given xanax, wine, was overweight and unhealthy and was the victim of very inappropriate behaviour from his owner. He was also known to drive a car. Xanax can have the adverse effect of agression. His case is really sad and tragic. I have no idea why anyone would want to have a damn chimpanzee in their house, it should be severely punished. This attack would not happen anywhere but in this specific case. No ape should be kept as a pet. Honestly he was innocent and the tragedy is the fault of the deranged owner, he was a wild animal. She should have known better and is at fault of the attack.
@langustajableczna no one is disputing that, just pointing out that these things do happen or can happen, so for the expert to say they don't is ridiculous
She also said she doesn't like the message it's sending, but the whole message of the movie is don't exploit animals!
@@ThePaganDruid idk if the movie doesn’t recreate everything extremely well then it’s bad because every single part of Travis’s life had an impact on the attack
Ok, but that chimp attack was based on an actual captive chimp's attack of his owner.
Really interesting video, but really, I don't even know what she's ranking at this point. Could might as well be the producers' error
She said Tarzan was inaccurate yet she gave it a higher rating than the accurate night of the museum just because they used a real monkey 😂
I'm surprised at the rating for the clip from Nope. While chimps in the wild are not like this at all, that's not the context for the clip. The movie is focused on the themes of trapping and confining wild creatures for entertainment and profit by humans. And instances of violence by chimps in captivity, especially when people keep them as pets, have happened and have been extremely violent and deadly. So I understand not wanting to condone an image of chimps as violent and deadly and dangerous when in the wild as they should be, but I don't think that the evidence agrees that chimps are totally safe when kept as pets or entertainment.
And the film even agrees with what she says about apes in the entertainment industry.
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the chimp in Nope CGI?
@@nightwish7074yup it was completely CGI
i guess she thought of the clip from Nope depicting apes as horrible aggressive creatures which also demonizes them. but I didn’t get that at all when I watched the movie, I thought the message was loud and clear that people should respect wild animals and shouldn’t be milked for our entertainment
But the message! As if that is what she was supposed to rate. Ugh.
@@seanbrazell7095 Honestly I can respect a professional wanting to clarify when something's portraying their profession in a negative light, especially when that profession is animal preservation. I just think when she was given the clip she wasn't given the context to the scene, which would have benefitted greatly
Is the expert giving rating based on her experience and facts or her feelings for the movie?
frl, how did 'nope' get a 0/10 when chimps do stuff like that all the time
Yeah, she gave it a 0 because she didn't like the way the scene made the chimp look bad. But also said that it's rare but has happened. So just listen to her knowledge and ignore the rating.
her saying anything above 0/10 goes against her whole agenda. i think we all virtually agree that we shouldn’t poach apes and should protect them. chimp behavior in their natural habitat and chimp behavior whilst neglected in captivity are 2 different things.
@@LodedKingpiin in natural habitat they rip eachothers nuts off
The title says ape attacks and the one clip they show of an ape attacking a human she gives a zero for being to violent.
U dont listen to sh
I can't believe she gave a zero to Nope. I know it's not good for chimp PR, but, we've seen chimps in captivity brutally attack people.
I thought Nope was about black people.
So you're telling me King Kong is fiction... ?
It's as if she's never watched any of these movies. "Caesar's eyes almost look human-like" WELL YEAH LADY, it's literally one of the main plot points in the movie.
The name is "how real is " NOT "how i feel about".
I don’t think she understood the assignment.
She did exactly what she was supposed to do and because she is human she has an opinion and a desire to express it.
@@eternalnate Except: she was supposed to rate it from how accurate it was not if she liked the film or not
@@Kyoryu_The_One And she did. So she did understand the assignment
@@eternalnate She said it was accurate but rated it off if she liked the film or not that was not what she was supposed to do
@@Kyoryu_The_One but yet she got it complete si?
Downvoted for her downvoting the scene with a real monkey. She was hired to rate the movie scenes, not to pass moral judgement on the use of animals in movies. If she rated it fairly, but then noted her moral judgement, that is another thing altogether
An APE, not a monkey. Given that you don’t grasp the distinction you shouldn’t be commenting
This is the first video from Insider I’ve ever seen where I don’t understand the guest’s rating. I’m not discounting her credibility or knowledge of apes, but is she just going off her liking of the film’s mentioned? Not wanting to condone certain acts depicted? Like what?! Just stick to the facts of ape behavior in the clips.
It’s a fun video . I can see the confusion as to the purpose but there was lots to learn and it was delivered in a fun way.
It's not that deep incels
almost as if the point of these videos wasn't the rating but to hear experts talk about their field
@@PeterChamor4???? Stop being a troll
@@duh990 cope
This has gotta be one of the most biased reviews Insiders ever had. She admits to how strong and aggressive chimps can be but then says she doesn’t like how it’s portrayed
Worst one yet.
Agree, didn't like like this at all. He scoring was bad and she got some facts wrong, first time I'm giving a video on this channel a thumbs down
0/10 on the chimp in Nope, huh? Mean while Travis the chimp mauling Charla Nash....
Agendas
this woman sucks!
That’s what I thought yeah
She does indeed @@stevefrank3599
Exactly, on top of that, Nope is essentially entirely about animal abuse in the film industry
I understand she's considered an expert, but she lost all credibility with me when she claimed chimps aren't prone to violence.
I agree. Chimps can be incredibly violent and I would never trust one.
I completely agree. There are way too many incidents that prove how aggressive chimps really are. I get to credit the RUclipsr, Casual Geographic, for my new found fear of chimps.
Do you people just make idle claims? Or do you question the foundation for things , like what the humans involved were doing to agitate a wild animal. Somehow there's always a camera around soon as the chimp is about to get violent ...hmmmmmmmm
She lost a bit of cred with me too, because chimps obviously ARE prone to violence. Especially in captivity, exactly like the movie was showing. And she gives it a zero yet some fake, animated Tarzan BS gets a higher rating? Ok, right.
There is a difference between being violent and being unpredictable, they're unpredictable. There are plenty of cases of humans doing violence does that mean humans as a whole are prone to violence?
She gives a 0/10 for really accurate clips because she puts her personal feelings above everything else, instead of just simply rating the accuracy?
hmph, women
@@GameFuMasterpathetic
Mate one movie 💀 youll live i wouldnt rate it either for having a real animal in the movie they dont belong there
@@TjnosaurusRexfeminine tears, my favorite
The chimp scene from "Nope" getting a 0 is kinda off the point I'd reckon.
I used to work in a French school in DR Congo, and one of my colleague was only a teacher to pay the bills. His and his wife's main focus was a chimp' sanctuary. So basically he would try and rescue chimpanzees in the area, mostly young ones who had escaped poachers, some who had escaped hunters, and adults who had been taken by rich idiots as pets. Those last ones were the worst, and most dangerous.
He used to tell us of one chimp' in particular, who had been abused so much he was half mad by the point he rescued him (dressed in human clothing, not enough space to live in, bad food for a chimpanzee, alcohol, and even cocaine...). One day, that particular individual escaped from the sanctuary, and began a frenzy through the city : crossing roads, throwing things at cars and people, running wild in the streets... He ended up in the maternity ward of the local hospital (a half-crazed chimpanzee on a frenzy in the middle of cradles...scary thing !).
The police wanted to shoot it, they were discouraged from doing so. Eventually, he charged my colleague, full speed. The dude stood his ground, hands on hips, and the chimp' just stopped, which gave a vet' enough time to finally aim right and tranquilize him.
Earlier, when his wife had tried to calm down the animal, he had bitten her on the face, and luckily she "only" had a single serious cut (which gave her a small scar). They told me an angry chimpanzee could break a human skull with his hands if it wanted to... Most of the times, what they found were dead or wounded chimpanzees when those encountered poachers or hunters, but sometimes the poachers would actually be killed, and apparently what a band of angry chimps' do to a human is not a pretty sight.
All in all, treating a chimpanzee, with the strength is has, as anything other than an actual chimpanzee, is a very bad idea, and someone getting hurt is then only a logical result. So the movie might not sell us the "good ape" side of the story, but the chimp's behaviour in that instance kinda makes sense...
i think her point was to prove that they aren’t like that by their own volition. i agree that it is against the whole video to further her agenda. a tortured chimpanzee which is made to be a party trick is certainly capable of that, as you explained.
@@LodedKingpiinbut even thats wrong. Chimps in nature are extremely violent towards other groups of chimps. They tear off each others limbs and even perform cannibalism. I love chimpanzees, they’re fascinating animals, but to say they aren’t violent is just wrong. They can do horrible things, even in nature, especially in nature.
Well Koba had been very painfully experimented on and treated horribly so yeah, he's much more aggressive than a regular bonobo would be. Also, the apes are all housed together because the place is absolutely terrible. It's not as if they were in a high end zoo. And there's also the fact that the apes in this situation have been medically altered to be more intelligent. As in intelligent enough to realize that cooperating will help them escape. I just don't understand the majority of her ratings, most experts allow the context of the movie or show to have an impact on how they're viewed. Just my opinion obviously.
Wonder how her reaction would have changed if they let the clip play out and Kong uses the little ape as a weapon.
Gotta say, not liking her appraisals. They sound like all these animals are the gentlest of animals. Very emotional appraisal.
A 10 for Tarzán,but 0 to Planet of the apes...seems that she doesn't watched the movies and ignores the background
lol I just said the same thing
"Chips aren't generally violent." Mean while in the congo an adult chip is literally tearing their child apart and eating them.
What a terrible guest. Very emotional thinking for scientist.
Gorillas arent often depicted as being gentle and nurturing. Literally the king kong movie is all about him being gentle and nuturing and misunderstood. Its ironic for an "expert" argue against harmful stereotypes yet have a stereotypical view of hollywood.
That is what I was thinking too especially in the Nope Scene with Gordie
Seriously, gorillas have been the gentle giants for well over 20 years now.
What is she on about?
You didnt listen, she explicitly mentioned this quality of the movie.
Also, like so many others, you didnt get the premise of these videos: How realistic is it?
She gave all the stuff that isnt realistic a low score, as she was asked to do.
If nothing else, enjoy the quality information she provided, as opposed to grieving over a bad rating for one or another movie you like.
@@Ganiscol Except Nope got a score of zero despite being based on something that actually happened.
You can't give something a zero for being unrealistic when it literally happened.
@@Ganiscol If I told you your reenactment of Julius Caser was spot on, excellent, best ever done, but then said I personally hate the Romans so because of that I have to give you a zero grade, is that a fair assessment of your acting?
Were they seriously commenting on the realism of King Kong…….cuz the giant 25ft ape isn’t unrealistic enough
"Ape Rates Human Attacks In Movies And TV"
Gives Jumanji a very low score because the mandrills don’t act appropriately. Yet gives Tarzan a high score despite it also having a mob of mandrills also acting inappropriately.
Let this be her first and last appearance on here.
crazy thing is NOPE is based on a real event. That actually happened like that
a 0 for Nope? kinda crazy but i do see her perspective from a wild chimp but from one that’s been forced to do acting work & that has been agitated so much to the point where it’s ripping a humans face off? there has absolutely been cases of chimps doing exactly THAT. but it doesn’t make me hate them, it makes me appreciate & respect their space even more
Especially after she pointed out all the things right with it, to then give it a 0 mad no sense
Even with the wild ones it doesn't make sense. Power struggles lead to non-consensual castration and missing fingers. Territory disputes lead to wars.
He'll, Jane Goodall herself nearly got beaten to death by one. The same one that would later kill and eat a human baby.
Chimps are 100% about that action.
Wild chimps are also highly aggressive and violent. Have you seen what happens when two chimp groups cross paths in the jungle? The outcome isn’t pretty.
I think this lady missed the point of what this video was supposed to be….
"Ape Expert Rates Movies And TV Shows Based On Personal Feelings And Not The Relevant Subject Matter"
The interesting thing about Nope is that when Gordy discovers Jupe hiding under the table, he actually signs “What happened family?”, implying that he wasn’t aware of what he had just done
Gentler side to chimps? She clearly is omitting the infamous Bonobo War.
Bonobos have never been seen going to war, only chimps.
"the monkeys are real and have no place in the entertainment industry, 0/10" bruh what? What does that have to do with the behaviour of the monkeys or how they are portrayed????
She saw a fight between a gorilla and a leopard?! Talk about that instead of telling us that king kong is bigger than a gorilla.
I don't understand her scoring criteria. She talks about how several aspects of each are realistic or not, but doesn't assign the score based on the accuracy of the behaviors. Seemingly, she scores based on how those behaviors get portrayed, or even the impression they form with the audience. The capuchin monkeys from Night at the Museum was the most confusing, since she explained that every one of the behaviors exhibited by the monkeys was accurate to wild capuchins, but since she disagreed with live monkeys being used in the entertainment industry, the film got 0/10. It's odd that a PhD Fulbright Scholar and National Science Foundation fellow would have so much trouble understanding this assignment.
Maybe because this assignment doesn't mean sense. Most of the movie are totally unrealistic. The rate in itself doesn't mean sense. Most of shark movies are stupid too.
What do you know the "expert" is wrong again Bonobos are not aggressive really a new study publishing April 12 2024 in the journal Current Biology shows that, within their own communities, male bonobos are more frequently aggressive than male chimpanzees. For both species, the more aggressive males had more mating opportunities. They also noted that female bonobos and chimpanzees are not passive and also display aggression, the researchers found that male bonobos were more frequently aggressive than chimpanzees. Overall, bonobos engaged in 2.8 times more aggressive interactions and 3 times as many physical aggressions. While male bonobos were almost exclusively aggressive toward other males, chimpanzees acted aggressively toward females as well as males. Chimpanzee aggression was also more likely to involve "coalitions" of males, rather than just one on one violence.
18:21 Very accurate and realistic, however I don't like the movie so 0/10
This is literally the type of expert reacts videos I despise 😤
Lady, we KNOW these are fictional, we KNOW Kong does not and cannot exist, we KNOW its unlikely a human could be raised by apes
Not discrediting what she knows but to basically discredit the work of Terry Notary and Andy Serkis and others who have painstakingly studied these animals to get their portrayals accurate is frankly insulting, Serkis did not spend so much time with gorillas to get Kong as real as he could for King Kong 2005 just to have some boffin say "that's not real, that can't happen"
And need I say more about the stupid remarks and ratings for Nope and Night At The Museum?
This is why the expert react series with Jonathan Ferguson (keeper of firearms and artillery at the Royal Armouries Museum in the UK which houses a collection of thousands of iconic weapons throughout history) is the best because he knows when something is fictional and will actually praise what devs do while pointing out inaccuracies
Enjoy the video and learning about apes - but doing “reviews” and rankings of movies doesn’t really make any sense here since most of these movies are showing some sort of an extreme example or modified/ape like creature
Probably would’ve worked better if she just kind of reacted and commented
NOPE 0/10!? Lady, you have obviously never heard of Travis, chimp civil wars, chimp politics, or even chimp hunting parties/raids
Did she rate the movies or the attacks? 🤔
A fair question. "This is accurate, but I hate it, so 0."
The clips
@@deckardcanineone movie and ur crying about it why r u so pissed im not mad shes supporting a movie with real animals
@@TjnosaurusRex I'm not mad or crying. I just think she broke the rules.
The reviews she gave are honestly terrible.
I don’t understand why she’s saying how good some of the animals look in the movie and then writing them zero
I think she's a bit to biased in her love for apes which is valid.. but I wouldn't say chimps are not prone to violence probably one of the most violent apes. seen documentary where they brutally fight between themself and attack and kill other chimps brutally to the point of torture and than most horrific attacks on humans were also done by chimps..
I enjoyed the video for the insight and knowledge about apes but the rating system was off..
This expert is a one timer here…. Thanks for coming either way 🙏🏻
Very informative video however you can tell this woman takes her job way too seriously and doesnt know to have fun with a work related topic / video
Great effort insider but as you can see most of us the fans aren’t impressed with this Video
When I picture gorillas it’s the one I watch eating fruits and veggies on RUclips 😂
Not sure what was the point of this video.
Not sure what is the point of your comment.
@@cethomas324Not sure why you are here.
Weak performance, Mrs. Major.
People are complaining about her ratings but, whatever problems there may be with those, she does a really good job explaining why a scene may or may not be realistic.
so she says everything in night at the museum is extremely accurate, to the point she’s witnessed it. AND it’s a real monkey doing it in the movie. but because capuchins shouldn’t have a role she gives it a 0?
The planet of the apes series is peak. The new movie was good but can’t wait for the next part
she is too bias,she doesn't like when the "monkey" are shown as the bad "guy"
I think the video would work a lot better without the numerical rating because it is unclear if Mayor is rating based on her preferences for the movie / scenes or based on how realistic the scenes are or how probable she finds the scenes.
I really enjoyed this video, Mireya gave so much educational information! Yes the primates act wrong in movies, and yes they are movies, but you really can't complain about how much information Mireya gave us and how interesting it was to learn! I love primates, and learning things I never knew when watching this video was amazing! Thank you Mireya!!
dont think she's been around saiyans for long, to make this judgement nor understand these are films/movies
I really enjoyed the video that you presented that you described what actual primate activity is versus Hollywood fantasy. I appreciate your knowledge and experience as always Dr. sweets Mireya!! Love Ya 🤗♥️
I mean ...
What is she trying to do here?
rating movies on Favoritism or Realism 😶
That was awesome Dr. Mireya! Have a great summer!
1:39 then why did they have to do that to Harambe?! 😢
Partly because Harambe /may have been/ displaying aggressive behavior towards the child, and partly because the guy who shot him was inexperienced.
I say "may have been" because it was firstly unclear if he was displaying aggressive behavior or inquisitive, but even if it were aggressive, it may have been directed at the screaming humans and not the child.
Primatologists argue to this day about whether or not shooting him was the correct course of action. On one hand, he may have been trying to /protect/ the child. But even if he was, what's harmless to a gorilla child could seriously injure or even kill a human child, so we still needed to get the child away from him safely.
My personal opinion? It was just an unfortunate set of circumstances for everyone involved - the child, the zoo, and Harambe. But I think with the knowledge the zoo had at the time, and with the clock not being in their favor if Harambe was in fact getting aggressive, taking him out was probably the best course of action. But not because Harambe did anything bad.
@@nightwish7074 Thank you for that explanation! Yeah, it was a tragic situation all around.
He was acting aggressive because the dipshits in the crowd were screaming and throwing things at him. Ensuring that he was freaked out. Which led to him dragging the kid as a prop for his display of strength.
The crowd stays calm and it probably ends differently.
@@nightwish7074I think the general consensus is that harambe wasn’t particularly trying to hurt the kid, in fact he was most likely trying to keep the kid safe in his own Gorilla way. The problem was the way a gorilla keeps a small individual safe isn’t really safe for a human child, dragging him by the foot, picking him up and running, all things a baby gorilla would have been mostly ok with but is very dangerous for a human. So they had no choice, chances are harambe would have accidentally injured or killed the kid or gotten frustrated by all the commotion ans gotten unpredictable
Did they show her the part where kong swing the baby monkey around like a club?
The best version of The Jungle Book was the Disney animated movie.
watch the Soviet version please
I remembered when i used to work as a zookeeper, I'm in charge for the reptiles, so i didn't know much about apes but once i saw they're fighting and one of the ape just help his hand up and all of them went quiet. It's an interesting thing to observe.
So "Nope" highly accurate gets a 0/10. Then "Tarzan" which is very unlikely gets a 10/10 come on @Insider. This isn't what we signed up for!
I watched a RUclips documentary presentation of an unusual circumstance of baby chimpanzees interacting/playing baboon babies and their troop. The mother chimpanzees kept a close eye on the interaction until it became slightly more aggressive. Playtime broke up.
Yea, she did not get the memo of her insider role
They could’ve just gotten me to do this video if all I had to do was based these movies on wether or not I liked them instead of actual facts and accuracy
Jane Goodall also described how horribly violent they were too. Especially when she documents their wars.
Yeah she didn’t understand how the rating is supposed to work. She completely forgot the fact the apes were experimented on. THATS why they’re so complex.
She loses all credibility two clips it. Not the best instalment to say the least.
Yeah she's the worst one in terms of expertise. Real sad cause I love this channel.
To be fair, I have also never seen an ape fight a godzilla
She is an Emotional Expert ha
This girl is honestly bias…
I find it really interesting that she says it's impossible for a human to be raised by gorillas, yet there are two(?) documented cases of two separate individuals being raised by wolves. I wonder why that is?
In the Planet of the Apes movies, I interpreted the change in their eyes looking more human was to make them appear more intelligent to the audience. Also, Koba was a severely abused test subject by humans. Although he is portrayed as a bad guy, his anger is well earned.
Thank you, Mireya Mayor! Glad to have your learned opinions.
Love the fact she gave Night at the Museum 0/10 bc they used real monkeys
She should come back to do Mighty Joe Young and Rampage
wow, based off her reactions/ratings and the overwhelming amount of people in the comments with same conclusion… please never have her back on the show. when did experts start to rate based on how they “feel” than the actual “IRL” aspects.
What next? Car expert rates transformers?😅
The issue with a lot of these experts is that while they aren't wrong they can't place things in perspective and just lack a massive amount of vision/fantasy to grasp the context of the scenes of choice
Great video!❤
Someone needs to tell her that she’s rating the apes, not how realistic Godzilla is.
awesome 🎬✨ so many interesting details ❤️
She said king kong could not climb the empire state building.. if he wanted to he gon do whatever he wants
Rating Planet of the apes ignoring that their intelligence is enhanced by laboratory experiment lol.
Thank you for the update, Insider..!! "Apes Together Strong" - Caesar, "Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)".
she missed the detail that he was trying to protect his crush which is that woman and it has been seen that the silverback gorillas can even risk their lives for their own children and family