Ian McEwan: Brexit, Mistakes in Literature, Moral Decision-Making | Full Video | The Origins Podcast

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 мар 2021
  • Please consider unlocking exclusive benefits by supporting our podcast at / originspodcast
    Ian McEwan sits down with Lawrence Krauss to discuss everything from Brexit, revolutions of social behavior, to mistakes in literature, and a new era of moral decision-making.
    Ian McEwan is a British novelist, screenwriter, and political activist. He is the author of 16 novels, 5 screenplays, 2 plays, and many short stories.
    McEwan is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, the Royal Society of Arts, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    An avowed atheist, he has spoken out regularly against Islamism for its views on women and homosexuality. He is also a staunch supporter of Humanist causes and in 2011 he was awarded the Jerusalem Prize for the Freedom of the Individual in Society. He is a strong opponent of Brexit.
    McEwan has been nominated for the Man Booker Prize six times, winning the prize in 1998 for his novel Amsterdam. His book Saturday won the James Tait Black Memorial Prize in 2005. He has also been the recipient of many other awards including the 1999 Shakespeare Prize by the Alfred Toepher Foundation in Hamburg and the 2019 Golden Plate Award from the American Academy of Achievement. He was awarded the CBE in 2000.
    11 of his stories have been adapted into films, including his novel Atonement which was nominated for 7 Academy Awards, winning one.
    The Times featured him on its list of “The 50 greatest British writers since 1945” and The Daily Telegraph ranked him number 19 in its list of the “100 most powerful people in British Culture”.
    www.ianmcewan.com/
    Twitter: / theoriginspod
    Instagram: / theoriginspod
    Facebook: / theoriginspod
    iTunes: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Website: TheOriginsPodcast.com
    The Origins Podcast, a production of The Origins Project Foundation, features in-depth conversations with some of the most interesting people in the world about the issues that impact all of us in the 21st century. Host, theoretical physicist, lecturer, and author, Lawrence M. Krauss, will be joined by guests from a wide range of fields, including science, the arts, and journalism. The topics discussed on The Origins Podcast reflect the full range of the human experience - exploring science and culture in a way that seeks to entertain, educate, and inspire.
    Thank you for your support!
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 114

  • @d.mavridopoulos66
    @d.mavridopoulos66 3 года назад +24

    The best talk I have ever attended, was given by Ian McEwan in Athens, Greece in 2018. He was enthrallingly articulate, on several subjects, for 1,5 hours non-stop. I've never envied another person's intellect so much, as when he was holding forth on every topic under the sun, in mellifluous sentences.

    • @paulscottfilms
      @paulscottfilms 2 года назад

      sure he holds forth ln everything he's a bloody elite left-wing precious transhuman specimen.

    • @lidiaadobato7822
      @lidiaadobato7822 Год назад

      Mellifluous: smooth and gentle flow. Very pleasant to listen to
      We don' t have the word in Spanish or rather, never used in this positive sense

  • @joanr3189
    @joanr3189 2 года назад +5

    I stumbled into this engrossing conversation. My mission now is to read all of Ian McEwan’s works. Such an interesting man.

  • @samboulton7722
    @samboulton7722 3 года назад +13

    Great interview Lawrence. One of my favourites! Please keep them coming.

  • @dtabb39268
    @dtabb39268 3 года назад +10

    Glad to see you back again.

  •  Год назад +1

    Thank you Lawrence and Ian for this wonderful conversation.

  • @philipjohn9566
    @philipjohn9566 Год назад +1

    What a rich conversation. Thank you so much.

  • @andrewpickering5180
    @andrewpickering5180 3 года назад +5

    Thank you for all your work.

  • @OscarWrightZenTANGO
    @OscarWrightZenTANGO 3 года назад +7

    Fascinating interview

  • @monicaangelini3324
    @monicaangelini3324 2 года назад +3

    Yes!!! Re-reading is amazing!

  • @universeatpeace3202
    @universeatpeace3202 3 года назад +4

    what an amazing interview. so true...thank you

  • @BooksForever
    @BooksForever 3 месяца назад

    Always a treat to see Hitch’s various friends carrying on with chats together.

  • @paulblease6029
    @paulblease6029 3 года назад +4

    How enlightening!

  • @Souljahna
    @Souljahna Год назад +1

    Wonderful interview. Thank you!

  • @CaroleMora22
    @CaroleMora22 8 месяцев назад

    Ian McEwan personifies excellence in critical thinking, creativity, and an eros-driven, extremely generous kind of human emotional intelligence and sensibility -- thank you! This talk also reminded me of E.O. Wilson's book Consilience, a gem of a book carrying related, provocative, and inspiring ideas.

  • @bijofrancis1114
    @bijofrancis1114 Год назад +2

    A good episode. I would love to watch and listen to Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro in this podcast.

  • @GNARGNARHEAD
    @GNARGNARHEAD 3 года назад +4

    I really like the idea that consciousness doesn't exist, in the sense that it's a concept that represents a hugely dynamic set interactions that is just computationally unreasonable for us to deal with.. outside of borderline metaphysical vagaries

    • @plumjam
      @plumjam 2 года назад +1

      If consciousness doesn't exist, what is it that likes the idea that consciousness doesn't exist?

  • @leonardniamh
    @leonardniamh Год назад

    This beautiful discussion reminds me of the movie Departures

  • @codrinvechiu2832
    @codrinvechiu2832 Год назад

    Brilliant.

  • @leonardniamh
    @leonardniamh Год назад

    Diving into their minds is just wonderful & a lifetime

  • @1patula
    @1patula 3 года назад +3

    Wonderful conversation, thank you

  • @petedawson4331
    @petedawson4331 3 года назад +4

    Krauss rocks the party.

  • @dickwagenaar3684
    @dickwagenaar3684 3 года назад +7

    Wonderful--I am so thankful for intelligent conversations these days. Thanks Lawrence. Keep it up.

  • @talbrott
    @talbrott 2 года назад

    thanks

  • @mykolatalankin7364
    @mykolatalankin7364 3 года назад +2

    Hi Kraus!

  • @rossconi
    @rossconi 3 года назад +8

    well this is an unexpected delight.

  • @Hollis_has_questions
    @Hollis_has_questions Год назад +1

    Science = organized curiosity. Nice.

  • @doyle6000
    @doyle6000 2 года назад

    Thinking, Fast and Slow - Daniel Kahneman
    Is this the book Ian McEwan mentions??

  • @yamishogun6501
    @yamishogun6501 Год назад

    32:00 on rereading books you read decades ago

  • @TheGatesOfFire
    @TheGatesOfFire 3 года назад +2

    How many adverts?

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 года назад

      i only had two RUclips adverts

  • @FannyAnzai
    @FannyAnzai 3 года назад +3

    First?! Hello, is this live or just premiered?!

  • @leonardoiglesias2394
    @leonardoiglesias2394 Год назад

    The hunger by Martin Caparros.

  • @mrav8r
    @mrav8r 2 года назад +1

    Lawrence, your questions were insightful, however I was wishing that you would step back and let Ian speak more words.

  • @46metube
    @46metube 3 года назад +4

    "we delude ourselves so efficiently.." that will do when it comes to human consciousness. how efficient our delusions are. poetry, psychology and science, all in one. humans are doomed, so we better get on with the serious business of dreaming.

  • @laurasalo6160
    @laurasalo6160 Год назад +1

    @53:00
    Krauss points out one reason why super intelligent creatures dont come to Earth to visit us.
    To paraphrase his answer:
    We're not exactly hunting down our microwaves from 1997 to see how they're doing either...😆🙃

    • @Hollis_has_questions
      @Hollis_has_questions Год назад

      If I were them, I wouldn’t visit us. Why would I? Observation from afar is enough of a reason to stay away.

  • @defenderofwisdom
    @defenderofwisdom 3 года назад

    I realize the morally cathartic (if less than emotionally cathartic) conclusion to the plot mentioned with lying about rape to make jail time for a true rapist who cannot be tried would be for the man to lie to the court and confess to a rape which did not happen, and for the woman he falsely claims to have raped to admit it did not happen and for *him* to go to jail for lying to the court. Assuming the only reason his true confession wouldn't bring jail time is because too much time passed from the crime since his confession is the faster solution.

  • @janetginger8571
    @janetginger8571 3 года назад +1

    The book, "Anurag Sager Of Kabir" COULD INTEREST YOU.

  • @defenderofwisdom
    @defenderofwisdom 3 года назад +1

    You know, this discussion made.me rethink the "smallness" scale.of civilization success. At first I thought ranking a civilization by mastery of the small was futile. Surely that would just be a component, where a species would expand just with tinier and tinier circuits. Nor are small aliens a new concept, I remember the old Animorph books I read had a species of small invaders, and since the author borrowed from the Invasion of the Body Snatchers for the primary plot I assume she borrowed that too. Then Accelerando argued if an AI-human pre-singularity shot a sophisticated set of AI agents to visit a brown dwarf on the edge of the solar system and came back, the advancement at the singularity would be so great by comparison to the coke-can-computer to render the journey meaningless. Here, we see something similar... Why put ten million humans on this station, two billion on this planet, when we could fit sixty trillion on earth by making people smaller. But I think the value in expansion is still in redundancy - the more planets, the more collisions and other solar system phenomena required to end life. Hell, the more stars it becomes even more resilient.

  • @lidiaadobato7822
    @lidiaadobato7822 2 года назад

    Im watching from Argentina and there are so many adverts. If announcers understood how one can hate the product advertised and swear to never ever buy it.

    • @a.t.c.3862
      @a.t.c.3862 Год назад

      😄 I consciously and deliberately do that; and bad mouth the advertised article or service whenever the occasion arises. Perhaps they'll learn.

  • @sircharlesnot
    @sircharlesnot 3 года назад +3

    Brexit - is independence that's for what

    • @tefilobraga
      @tefilobraga 3 года назад +2

      And is independence supposed to be intrinsically good? Or is it just a religious and tribal irrational value?

    • @sircharlesnot
      @sircharlesnot 3 года назад +4

      @@tefilobraga it's the only true good. Liberty is the founding principle of all democratic countries!!!

  • @PerryTribeMetalBaker
    @PerryTribeMetalBaker 3 года назад +1

    Dinner Time!!

  • @johnhanks4260
    @johnhanks4260 2 года назад

    Chaos theory Consciousness.

  • @Larkinchance
    @Larkinchance 2 года назад +1

    We are unwittingly constructing the Matrix

  • @johnmorgan5495
    @johnmorgan5495 3 года назад

    Hey, maybe the octopus' are the intelligent aliens.

    • @jorgegomez524
      @jorgegomez524 3 года назад

      if they end up in my plate, they aren’t that intelligent. First sign of intelligence is becoming the apex predator.

  • @mgthaking
    @mgthaking 3 года назад +1

    Hello my 👽s

  • @2msvalkyrie529
    @2msvalkyrie529 2 года назад +1

    Listen to the archetypal petit bourgeois rant about
    Brexit and lost trade deals at the end . Can anyone
    seriously imagine Proust / Mann / Tolstoy or any other
    truly great novelist chuntering on about lost trade
    deals ?!?!..... Sums McEwen up perfectly.

  • @raewrite1081
    @raewrite1081 2 года назад

    P is

  • @SThrillz
    @SThrillz 3 года назад

    God created man so he can experience what he jacked, mortality and ignorance.

  • @gordonlinton3555
    @gordonlinton3555 3 года назад +3

    Great interview, although it's clear that Ian hasn't had a serious debate about Brexit to help him understand the real issues.

    • @davidleibel
      @davidleibel 2 года назад

      You provide not a single argument in support of your statement, Mr Linton. Because there is none. As McEwan says Brexit has become a religious belief unsupported by evidence.

    • @gordonlinton3555
      @gordonlinton3555 2 года назад +4

      @@davidleibel I assume projecting Brexit as some kind of religious belief makes you feel comfortable inside lol... It's not a good look to the outside world.

  • @escapefelicity2913
    @escapefelicity2913 2 года назад +1

    Lawrence, quit interrupting

  • @geoffreynhill2833
    @geoffreynhill2833 3 года назад

    AI = BLX

  • @kurtklingbeil6900
    @kurtklingbeil6900 3 года назад +2

    Krause sure likes to hear himself talk...
    He's got a guest but spends more time pontificating his own views rather than listening

    • @oldskeptic1513
      @oldskeptic1513 3 года назад

      ... if you've got it, flaunt it... some need to be pontificating to...

    • @monicaangelini3324
      @monicaangelini3324 2 года назад +1

      It is not an interview it is a talk

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 года назад

      @@monicaangelini3324 exactly

  • @escapefelicity2913
    @escapefelicity2913 2 года назад

    Get rid of the background noise

  • @ian7666
    @ian7666 2 года назад +1

    As much as I admire him as a writer, it’s clearly easy to boggle his mind, and in stating that no-one is making an economic argument for Brexit he’s clearly very short sighted on the costs of uncontrolled immigration that the EU refused to budge on, forcing us to leave. A “folly” according to the multi-millionaire whose living standards haven’t been impacted by 40 years of real wage deflation

    • @urbansoundscapes7734
      @urbansoundscapes7734 2 года назад +6

      Please don't forget that it has been UK government policy to encourage immigration (to help the economy) over many decades, not the EU forcing uncontrolled immigration upon us. Pressure for the UK to leave the EU came predominantly from the very wealthy (many overseas) who funded the Brexit campaign. Brexit was driven and motivated by money, power and the retention of control of British tax havens for the wealth of the few. For the vast majority Brexit is bringing a lower quality of life; lower regulatory standards, fewer opportunities to study, work and live our lives where we want, negatively impacting the economy and with it public services and infrastructure - not to mention the undermining of established security alliances. In my view his mind is anything but boggled!

    • @daviddavids2884
      @daviddavids2884 2 года назад +1

      your uninvited and under-informed OPINION is noted.

    • @ian7666
      @ian7666 2 года назад

      @@daviddavids2884 If you say so, snowflake 🤷‍♂️

  • @jcarlosperezgmail
    @jcarlosperezgmail 3 года назад +1

    Fastest way to lose respect for an intellectual with their arrogance towards the majority of people when they don't like their decisions.

    • @johnlee5423
      @johnlee5423 3 года назад +2

      And why should he LIKE the majorities decision

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 года назад

      @@johnlee5423 he should at least respect it

    • @johnlee5423
      @johnlee5423 2 года назад +2

      @@doyle6000 why

    • @doyle6000
      @doyle6000 2 года назад

      @@johnlee5423 because it's a democracy - majority rules!

    • @johnlee5423
      @johnlee5423 2 года назад

      @@doyle6000 stupidity of the majority does not have to be respected

  • @joesheridan2558
    @joesheridan2558 3 года назад

    again with loaded questions pushing right wing narrative that krauss buys into.did it with woody allen also.

  • @DouwedeJong
    @DouwedeJong 3 года назад +1

    Lawrence feels forced, something is wrong. - Perhaps the fact that Ian doesn't think science is anything more special than organized curiously.

    • @drts6955
      @drts6955 3 года назад

      it gets better

  • @Gringohuevon
    @Gringohuevon 3 года назад +2

    boring self-indulgent nonsense

  • @doyle6000
    @doyle6000 2 года назад +3

    Amazing interview, thank you.