Revolver vs Semi Autos The FACTS for ALL Gun Owners

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 фев 2025
  • If you like my videos and would like to support my channel please feel free to visit my Patreon
    Patreon Link
    / neverenuffammo
    To be a part of the NEA community join us over on Discord. This is where we can share ideas, Gun Porn, Geek Porn, live chat & more
    / discord
    NEA Amazon Store for all kinds of goodies
    www.amazon.com...
    If you'd like to send anything to the channel & get featured on video
    The Mailing Address is .....
    NeverEnuffAmmo
    PO Box 369
    Olmito, Tx 78575
    NeverEnuffAmmo T-Shirts
    shop.spreadshi...
    NeverEnuffAmmo Facebook Page
    / 481494785286706
    Matt's Facebook Profile
    / neverenuffammo
    Instagram
    / neammo
    Twitter
    / neverenuffammo

Комментарии • 84

  • @rbm6184
    @rbm6184 Год назад +2

    Lots of folks do not want the hassles of autoloaders, jams, mags, round in the chamber, out of battery, the overall greater problems and complex manual of arms. Revolvers are simple in operation if not function where they are complex and the big downside that always comes up is capacity. Well a shooter can have all the capacity in the world and it won't do any good if the shooter is not competent in accuracy whether autoloader or revolver. Capacity can't make up for poor marksmanship. Not only that but we are responsible for every round that leaves our gun as there is a lawyer attached to every bullet whether autoloader or revolver. Fortunately for most real world shooting cases only two to three rounds are needed to stop a threat as proven by Greg Ellifritz shooting data. Yes we should use every bit of capacity we have until the threat to our lives is stopped. That is why we have reloads both for autoloaders and revolvers.

  • @nclucky1789
    @nclucky1789 Год назад +2

    One well aimed 44mag =18 poorly placed 9mm. You don't need all those rounds, Matt.

  • @docktaphil
    @docktaphil Год назад +9

    10mm ammo costs the same as.38 special but has over 2x the horsepower

    • @dancruze
      @dancruze Год назад +1

      Cost isn't really the same though...

    • @docktaphil
      @docktaphil Год назад

      Both are running 10 to 13 beans per round more than 9mm, but 10mm is 2x the delivered package as 38 special. Even 9mm defeats 38 for significantly less cost. There's just no argument for revolvers other than the novelty of carrying a limited capacity artifact around.

    • @dancruze
      @dancruze Год назад +1

      @@docktaphil full 10mm rounds are way more expensive vs 38spec

    • @originallonewolf6643
      @originallonewolf6643 Год назад

      ​@@docktaphillies the 9mm does not beat the 38 no other caliber other then 38 cal move on average 200 fps slower then a 9mm and the 9mm still have a hard time doing better 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @MrBill-mq7ti
    @MrBill-mq7ti Год назад +8

    I'll go along, as long as your semiauto is a 1911.😊

  • @Saku19
    @Saku19 Год назад +6

    Watching this while pocket carrying a S&W 442.
    I usually carry a semi-auto, but when I'm going to short trips (corner store) or I'm just wearing shorts or clothes that don't favor concealed carry, I pocket carry a snub-nose.

    • @docktaphil
      @docktaphil Год назад +1

      A Hellcat Pro is the same size with 16rds.

    • @Saku19
      @Saku19 Год назад +2

      @@docktaphil No, the 442 is definitely smaller. Since you opened with a lie, I'm gonna consider this the end of the conversation.

    • @DomoArigatoRobot0
      @DomoArigatoRobot0 Год назад

      Man, it's not smaller by much. Calm down there, was he really "lying"@@Saku19 ?

    • @wgreenjr81
      @wgreenjr81 Год назад

      @@docktaphil first things first, fuck Springfield, secondly as someone who also carries a 442, even if a sub-compact pistol can fit in the same height x length box, the 442 (which is hammerless) will always be more comfortable to carry and draw since the beavertail and the back of the slide on a pistol add bulk and cause an awkward angle for a pocket draw. I tried pocket carrying my S&W Shield and even though it was the same general dimensions, the draw was completely impractical due to the beavertail

    • @x.adam1
      @x.adam1 Год назад

      I still haven’t gotten a holster for my 360 revolver. For self defense I’m good with 5
      357 magnum rounds if it’s up close.

  • @joshuabracke5775
    @joshuabracke5775 Год назад +6

    You and Yankee should debate it love on his livestream. He would get a kick out of the drama

  • @floridahighwaypatrol7713
    @floridahighwaypatrol7713 Год назад +5

    Yankees, main arguments as to why he prefers a revolver over a semi auto is that revolvers tend to have more powerful calibers that have a better time punching through hard barriers, and they also tend to be more reliable, since there are less moving parts.

    • @x.adam1
      @x.adam1 Год назад +2

      That argument was lost as soon as the sentence started with ‘Yankee’ 😂😂😂😂

    • @cagneybillingsley2165
      @cagneybillingsley2165 Год назад

      yankee is an abject maroon. 99% of the time you don't want to be punching through any barriers. 9mm speer gold dot does the job. reliability argument is debunked already. glocks have less moving parts than the typical revolver. revolvers have tons of small parts too. anyone who still argues in favor of 1911 or revolvers is a typical boomer ree ree who thinks he's going to be figting bears in the middle of the city.

    • @Ray-vq2jc
      @Ray-vq2jc Год назад

      @@x.adam1 How so? It made sense to me.

  • @ruzzellp
    @ruzzellp Год назад

    Accessories: Red dot, light, laser, adjustable grip size, magazines greater than standard capacity, wide choice of iron sights

  • @jackmunch6978
    @jackmunch6978 7 месяцев назад +1

    Revolvers are:
    1. Better at handling big calibers. Stopping power matters.
    2. Simpler to operate.
    3. Jam less often.
    4. I think better looking.
    5. In California there is a 10 round magazine limit. So if your talking a 7 or 8 round revolver vs 10 rounds from a semi auto, the capacity argument shrinks.
    6. If your committing a crime (not recommending it) no shells left on the ground.

  • @expo2000000
    @expo2000000 Год назад +3

    Revolvers are still modern enough to be tacticalized and hold magnum sized calibers for large mamals and/or AI drones semi-autos cant shoot ;)

  • @xxmrbrooksxx
    @xxmrbrooksxx Год назад +5

    Totally agree. Especially striker fired. Great content.

  • @albertlincoln1729
    @albertlincoln1729 Год назад +1

    Y tf is this still a thing? Revolvers are obsolete. No doubt about it.

    • @killerkraut9179
      @killerkraut9179 6 месяцев назад

      In grappling situation have the revolvers a advantage !

  • @albertmcmichael9110
    @albertmcmichael9110 Год назад +3

    I have both. So there.

  • @Life_Is_Torture0000
    @Life_Is_Torture0000 Год назад +3

    I think it depends on the circumstances and intended use of the weapon. Though there is overlap, no one gun or type of gun is ideal for every situation.

    • @cagneybillingsley2165
      @cagneybillingsley2165 Год назад

      a glock or m&p takes care of 99% of most people's gun needs. revolvers and clowns who advocate them for various contrarian and or social approval reasons is a joke in the modern age. it's like carrying a 1911 instead of a glock type because muh metal gun muh two world wars. absolute irrational imbecilia

  • @DomoArigatoRobot0
    @DomoArigatoRobot0 Год назад +2

    Thank you NEA, great advice. Especially for the casual like me who:
    -- Won't practice as much
    -- Worries about capacity in a defensive gun use situation
    Yankee Marshall also highlights that revolvers can come in "bear repellant" cartridges, which is fantastic for his property but not necessarily necessary for this suburban boy. Must admit, revolvers look much better to me. Maybe one day, with more brass in pocket, I'll get that sweet S&W .357 (and know I have enough to pay for that revolver gunsmith!)

  • @reavis1474
    @reavis1474 Год назад +4

    Love that you can call out a friend and worried about losing that friendship. #spanktheyank 😂😂😂😂

  • @brandonlorance8584
    @brandonlorance8584 Год назад +2

    I think the only area where a revolver excels is being able to be chambered in powerful cartridges like 500 mag or 454 casull

  • @Fred_Bender
    @Fred_Bender Год назад +5

    Would be better if you were holding an 8 shot 357 instead of a 5 shot revolver.

    • @x.adam1
      @x.adam1 Год назад

      It would be, but also much bigger and heavier.

  • @stansbornak8116
    @stansbornak8116 Год назад +3

    Two superstars together again!

  • @wgreenjr81
    @wgreenjr81 Год назад +4

    As someone who daily carries a J frame, I know full well that a revolver is an objectively better tool. That said, the reason I make the choice to carry a revolver is that I am a big guy, I've experimented with all the kinds of carry options I am comfortable with (just can't bring myself to try appendix) and have the drawer of holsters like everyone else to show for it. The only method that I know I can and will reliably carry daily is in my pocket. That choice made, I've tried both my S&W Shield and my S&W 442 J frame, and the J frame is the better choice for me. I know what I am giving up, but I also know that while 15 or even 10 is better than 5, 5 is also a lot better than zero.

    • @cagneybillingsley2165
      @cagneybillingsley2165 Год назад

      objective better aka your pea brain can't fathom how 17 rounds might be better for multiple attackers than a 5 shots revolver PLUS speedloaders lol.

    • @TheMrPeteChannel
      @TheMrPeteChannel Год назад +1

      Also that 5 will never jam on you.

    • @albertlincoln1729
      @albertlincoln1729 Год назад

      Objectively my ass.

    • @carlosmorris4510
      @carlosmorris4510 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@TheMrPeteChannel Very true... My thought is that a revolver will get you more reliably to that first or second crucial shot than a semi-auto - which could jam. A lot could happen during the 2-3 seconds that it takes to clear the jam with a semi-auto; critical time is lost.

  • @joebleed
    @joebleed Год назад +5

    Go on slap the yank with this topic. :-)

  • @dinospumoni8860
    @dinospumoni8860 Год назад +3

    Still think the escape from la vs escape from New York would have been a better video

    • @moobutt
      @moobutt Год назад

      It would have been 5 seconds long. “Escape From New York is wayyyyyyy better.” End of video.

  • @umbrellacorpmarketingdept7154
    @umbrellacorpmarketingdept7154 Год назад +6

    Take a revolver to a three day handgun class where you dump a thousand rounds and you will never want to look at one again. Revolver probably wouldn’t run a thousand rounds anyway before failing catastrophically.

    • @originallonewolf6643
      @originallonewolf6643 Год назад

      What🤔

    • @KD-lb9bg
      @KD-lb9bg Год назад

      Lol.

    • @Hakunamatata51101
      @Hakunamatata51101 Год назад

      *Ruger has entered the chat*
      “Hold my beer.”

    • @umbrellacorpmarketingdept7154
      @umbrellacorpmarketingdept7154 Год назад

      @@Hakunamatata51101 Ruger’s beer just so happens to be a Bud Light because Ruger is gay.

    • @bigjon576
      @bigjon576 3 месяца назад

      You have no idea what you're talking about, People have revolvers that have shot hundreds of thousands of rounds through them with no issues..

  • @redneckmini14
    @redneckmini14 Год назад

    Semi auto for the streets and revolver for the woods.

  • @g54b95
    @g54b95 Год назад

    Revolvers vs. Semi Auto...the best option? A German Shepherd.

  • @t2brfu67
    @t2brfu67 Год назад +1

    Flame war...EENNNGGAAGED

  • @TheMrPeteChannel
    @TheMrPeteChannel Год назад

    Revolvers don't jam. And unless you have a blow back semi you can jam a Revolver into a person & don't need to worry about a slide snagging clothing if you fire.

  • @killerkraut9179
    @killerkraut9179 6 месяцев назад

    In grappling situation the revolvers have most likely a advantage!

  • @apaiva788
    @apaiva788 Год назад +2

    Idk...its hard to beat my ruger lcrx for a carry gun

  • @ghostshadow9046
    @ghostshadow9046 Год назад

    have revolvers can fire 357 mag, 38 special AND 9mm, also have revolver that can fire 460, 45 Raptor, 454, 45 win mag, 45 colt, 45 schofield, 45acp, 45 gap and 45 auto rim. you won't find a semi auto capable of firing different types of ammo also a revolver won't malfunction firing old or weaker loaded ammo.

  • @drillsergeant623
    @drillsergeant623 Год назад

    Well well, look who just lost his BFF.

  • @onlymybest9162
    @onlymybest9162 Год назад +1

    Hell yea Matt! you are the man brother!

  • @Engineguy66
    @Engineguy66 Год назад +3

    I'll take a Glock any day of the week over a revolver. More ammo and extra magazines to keep going

  • @Ray-vq2jc
    @Ray-vq2jc Год назад

    The trained Revolver man has won many gun fights over the Semi auto guy.

  • @randomhobby3729
    @randomhobby3729 Год назад +2

    Semi auto polymer pistol. No doubt

  • @robbertloevendie9384
    @robbertloevendie9384 Год назад

    They still make revolvers? 😊

  • @demongeminix
    @demongeminix Год назад +1

    Hahahaha!!! Slap!

    • @x.adam1
      @x.adam1 Год назад

      What did the five fingers say to the face?

  • @whitedogproductions6153
    @whitedogproductions6153 Год назад

    Slap the Yank???

  • @geraldcagney5926
    @geraldcagney5926 Год назад

    Semi auto is best shit on earth!!!!!

  • @officertaterhater
    @officertaterhater Год назад +1

    BOOOOO!!!!!!

  • @peter_d
    @peter_d Год назад +1

    Oh I love my semi autos. I would never give them up. But what are you smoking today? Revolvers come out on top every time