Mike is not wrong about the going to the gym aspect being an excuse to earn your way to lounging around. I went down from four strength training days down to three which gives me four active recovery days meaning I do something everyday but typically Saturdays are the only days that I Lounge but I'm still getting up and cleaning going shopping doing my active recovery add walking after every meal. Honestly I stay on my feet all day until maybe an hour or two before bed where I'm stretching and meditating on the floor
Not even 12 minutes in and I'm facepalming at the lack of scientific understanding by Mike and the gall to state something so egregiously incorrect about blood cholesterol and dietary cholesterol. HDL has been shown in genetic studies and RCTs to not independently reduce heart disease risk. HDL is more a proxy for overall metabolic health. Triglycerides should be watched yes but LDL is still a stonger predictive factor than triglycerides. Fribrates do lower triglycerides btw. Furthermore, The institute of medicine literally states in its 2005 report including dietary cholesterol, chapter 9, that there is a linear relationship between dietary cholesterol and blood cholesterol. Dietary cholesterol mostly raises LDL, which is causal in ASCVD development (Ferrence et al., 2017; Boren et al., 2020). To claim LDL or total cholesterol is not something to be concerned with, and instead focus on HDL to total cholesterol ratio is at least a fundamental lack of understanding of the literature and at worst a fundamental denial of the literature and over 70 years of evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. This is why you dont bring people on a channel and platform them when they have no understanding of lipidology and espouse pseudo-science which goes against over a half century of research. Mike has no business talking about lipids. Edit: saying food causes bodily trauma is a really terrible way to talk about nutrition Mike. This polarizing language is not at all scientific nor helpful. Go figure he self proclaims hes low carb/mostly carnivore. Par for the course.
@Nick-gg6tg citation needed for that claim you just made. Keto and lower carb as dietary strategies can be quite healthy promoting when eating plenty of fibrous non-starchy carbohydrates like cruciferous green leafy vegetables, while also keeping saturated fat below 10% of daily calories. But the problem is many people do not do that. Instead it's low fiber and higher saturated fat and typically more red meat most often, which is not a long term health promoting diet based on all the nutrition evidence we have to date. One can lose weight on such dietary patterns sure, that's a calories equation, but the evidence is exceedingly clear on the matter of blood cholesterol and risk for lifetime ASCVD event and mortality risk. It's literally a log linear relationship with blood cholesterol and heart disease risk. Lipidology is a complex topic (hence I'm not delving deeper into it) and is far out of Mike's scope to discuss. Giving the advice to have yearly labs is not really supported nor necessary especially for more complex lab measures. Talk with your doctor or get a referral to an specialist dealing with these topics for actual expert medical advice. Moreover, the mentality that often accompanies those who are on such diets (particularly carnivore) are those of conspiracy, contrarianism, and intellectual dishonesty (most of the time, clearly not every single person is like this). This mentality and world view is evidenced repeatedly when talking about LDL cholesterol and long established advice for health which are portrayed as "outdated" ways of thinking and usually comes with conspiratorial ways of thinking such as "They" want us to be sick and have low cholesterol and "the experts are all wrong". Hence why I made the edit in the original comment saying once Mike said his dietary style his views were par for the course.
mark you have become such an embarrassment with the people you choose to market your gimmicks with and the crap you sell online I just truly cant believe it. I wouldn't take anything you have to say seriously anymore after seeing all the shill shit.
As a Medical Laboratory Scientist who tests blood and body fluids daily, this is cool to see these convos be had.
cool new format.
Your raw knees sleeves are awesome, as is Mike!
Alcohol "enhances some experiences for her", same for my wife, lol! We have cut back on alcohol but have not entertained giving it up completely.
Yes sir Mark glad mine came back great good to see you boy's ok have a great Thursday ❤uall later 💪🏼
Mike is not wrong about the going to the gym aspect being an excuse to earn your way to lounging around. I went down from four strength training days down to three which gives me four active recovery days meaning I do something everyday but typically Saturdays are the only days that I Lounge but I'm still getting up and cleaning going shopping doing my active recovery add walking after every meal. Honestly I stay on my feet all day until maybe an hour or two before bed where I'm stretching and meditating on the floor
😮
Not even 12 minutes in and I'm facepalming at the lack of scientific understanding by Mike and the gall to state something so egregiously incorrect about blood cholesterol and dietary cholesterol. HDL has been shown in genetic studies and RCTs to not independently reduce heart disease risk. HDL is more a proxy for overall metabolic health. Triglycerides should be watched yes but LDL is still a stonger predictive factor than triglycerides. Fribrates do lower triglycerides btw. Furthermore, The institute of medicine literally states in its 2005 report including dietary cholesterol, chapter 9, that there is a linear relationship between dietary cholesterol and blood cholesterol. Dietary cholesterol mostly raises LDL, which is causal in ASCVD development (Ferrence et al., 2017; Boren et al., 2020). To claim LDL or total cholesterol is not something to be concerned with, and instead focus on HDL to total cholesterol ratio is at least a fundamental lack of understanding of the literature and at worst a fundamental denial of the literature and over 70 years of evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. This is why you dont bring people on a channel and platform them when they have no understanding of lipidology and espouse pseudo-science which goes against over a half century of research. Mike has no business talking about lipids.
Edit: saying food causes bodily trauma is a really terrible way to talk about nutrition Mike. This polarizing language is not at all scientific nor helpful.
Go figure he self proclaims hes low carb/mostly carnivore. Par for the course.
Your wrong. Obviously. Look at society vs people that eat keto/carnivore. We are far healthier than the mass population.
@Nick-gg6tg citation needed for that claim you just made. Keto and lower carb as dietary strategies can be quite healthy promoting when eating plenty of fibrous non-starchy carbohydrates like cruciferous green leafy vegetables, while also keeping saturated fat below 10% of daily calories. But the problem is many people do not do that. Instead it's low fiber and higher saturated fat and typically more red meat most often, which is not a long term health promoting diet based on all the nutrition evidence we have to date. One can lose weight on such dietary patterns sure, that's a calories equation, but the evidence is exceedingly clear on the matter of blood cholesterol and risk for lifetime ASCVD event and mortality risk. It's literally a log linear relationship with blood cholesterol and heart disease risk. Lipidology is a complex topic (hence I'm not delving deeper into it) and is far out of Mike's scope to discuss. Giving the advice to have yearly labs is not really supported nor necessary especially for more complex lab measures. Talk with your doctor or get a referral to an specialist dealing with these topics for actual expert medical advice.
Moreover, the mentality that often accompanies those who are on such diets (particularly carnivore) are those of conspiracy, contrarianism, and intellectual dishonesty (most of the time, clearly not every single person is like this). This mentality and world view is evidenced repeatedly when talking about LDL cholesterol and long established advice for health which are portrayed as "outdated" ways of thinking and usually comes with conspiratorial ways of thinking such as "They" want us to be sick and have low cholesterol and "the experts are all wrong". Hence why I made the edit in the original comment saying once Mike said his dietary style his views were par for the course.
Skittles and pizza is never ok..
mark you have become such an embarrassment with the people you choose to market your gimmicks with and the crap you sell online I just truly cant believe it. I wouldn't take anything you have to say seriously anymore after seeing all the shill shit.