The Rising - Ballad of Mangal Pandey (Enfield Pattern 1853 rifle-musket)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- The Enfield P53 was introduced to Indian troops under British rule in 1856. The Enfield rifle-musket was a contributing cause of the Indian rebellion of 1857. Sepoys in the British East India Company's armies in India were issued with the new rifle in 1857, and rumours were spread that the cartridges (referring here to paper-wrapped powder and projectile, not to metallic cartridges) were greased with beef tallow, pig fat, or a combination of the two - a situation so abhorrent to Hindu and Muslim soldiers based on religious beliefs.
British military drills of the time required soldiers to tear open by biting open the prepared cartridge, pour the gunpowder contained within down the barrel, snap off the greased end of the cartridge containing the bullet at the muzzle, ram it home, bring up the rifle to the hip, replace the percussion cap, ready the rifle by setting the sights and moving it to full cock, then to present the rifle, marking the target and squeezing the trigger. The musketry books also recommended that, "Whenever the grease around the bullet appears to be melted away, or otherwise removed from the cartridge, the sides of the bullet should be made wet in the mouth before putting it into the barrel; the saliva will serve the purpose of grease for the time being".
The idea of having anything which might be tainted with pig or beef fat in their mouths was unacceptable to the Indian soldiers, and when they objected it was suggested that they were more than welcome to make up their own batches of cartridges, using a religiously acceptable greasing agent such as ghee or vegetable oil. This seemed to prove that the issued cartridges were, in fact, greased with pig and/or beef fat. A further suggestion that the Sepoys tear the cartridges open with their hands (instead of biting them open) was rejected as impractical - many of the Sepoys had been undertaking musket drill daily for years, and the practice of biting the cartridge open was second nature to them. Incidentally, after the Mutiny, manuals amended the method of opening the cartridge to, "Bring the cartridge to the forefinger and thumb of the left hand, and with the arm close to the body, carefully tear off the end without spilling the powder." The arrogant indifference of many British commanding officers to the problem, a religious consideration as to tolerance, as perceived by the Sepoys only added more fuel to the already volatile situation, and helped spark the rebellion in 1857.
As a consequence of British fears, the Indian infantry's long arms were modified to be less accurate by reaming out the rifling of the Pattern 1853 making it a smooth bore and the spherical / ball shot does not require greasing, just a patch. This greatly reduced the gun's potency and effectiveness, as did replacing the variable distance rear sight to a fixed sight. This became the Pattern 1858. However, due to the now thinner walls, the barrel would bulge and bursting was not an unknown problem. Furthermore, with the bayonet fitted excessive flexing became an issue. To remedy this, an urgent order was placed in England for around 12,000 new barrels made specifying with a thicker barrel wall. This became the very scarce Enfield Pattern 1859 which in good to very good condition attracts a premium.
...새롭게 지급된 1853년형 엔필드 강선머스킷은 보다 빠른 장전을 위하여 개별 포장된 탄약통을 사용하였다. 이 총은 병사들이 종이로 싼 탄약통을 입으로 물어뜯고 탄약을 총신에 재겨 넣은 뒤, 탄약이 흐르는 것을 방지하기 위해 종이와 탄환을 함께 총신에 넣고 발사하도록 고안되었다. 문제는 탄약통의 방수를 위해 종이에 동물성 지방을 입힌 것에서 비롯되었다. 돼지나 소의 지방을 이용한 탄약통을 입으로 물어뜯어 쓰라고 하는 것은, 돼지를 불결하게 여기던 무슬림 병사나 소를 신성하게 여기는 힌두 병사 모두에게 종교에 따른 차별로 받아들여졌다. 1857년 1월 27일, 참모장 리처드 버치는 새로운 머스켓 총을 사용하면 총신에 따로 그리스를 칠하지 않아도 되니 "세포이들이 좋아할 것"이라며 모든 세포이들에게 1853년식 엔필드 머스켓을 지급하라고 지시하였다. 새 탄약통이 지급되자마자 벵골에 있던 영국군의 덤덤 보급창에서 탄약통을 둘러싼 논란이 보고되었다. 상위 카스트에 속한 세포이들이 자신의 카스트 지위를 잃는 것이 두려워 탄약통 수령을 거부한 것이다. 물론 탄약통의 종이는 꼭 입으로 물어뜯지 않아도 손으로 뜯어 사용할 수 있었다. 그러나, 종교적 반감을 고려하지 않은 채 지급된 탄약통에 대한 루머가 삽시간에 퍼져, 세포이들 사이에서는 기존의 탄약통에 그리스를 발라 쓰는 것보다도 못한 새 탄약통은 순전히 세포이를 모욕하기 위해 지급된 것이란 말이 나돌았다.
I like how the British characters speak Hindi/Urdu very well. British officers did have to learn the languages and cultures of the Indian soldiers he is supposed to lead rather than relying on translators.
yes, so do most colonial governors
@@aamaravel2493 Not the French or Belgian they insisted French was the language
@@xi7837 yea, but then again the french and belgians did not have a good reputation for governing their colonies well
@@aamaravel2493my guy they're both shit at governing whether it's colonial or not 😂
If they don't learn Indian language There Maybe misconduct in soldiers cause They rely on Translator Then The soldiers can Plan for Throwing them over
The man on the horse is played by Jeremy Clyde.
Clyde is the great great great grandson of the first Duke of Wellington.
wow
Holy moly
@Commander John Patriot the guy who won battles against the Marathas and gained control of India in the first place
@Commander John Patriot Arthur Wellesley
well isnt tat interesting
This is the mos dramatic biting of a cartridge I've ever seen.
Ikr
@TREVOR WILSON the more accurate name will be
The cartridge that took lives
@TREVOR WILSON lol
@TREVOR WILSON I think you meant to say 35,000 British
@TREVOR WILSON Excuse if im ignorant of Indian history, but what exactly Pandey wanted with the revolt? An Independent India or just a better treatment for his men under the British rule?
EIC: Oh, those dogs? They were sniffing the powder!
Sepoys: Oh, okay!
*Roll credits*
@Caden Gaming 🐿boi🐿what🐿the🐿hell🐿boi🐿
Cartillages contains fat of cow and pigs
@@Believer7781 Actually, it was tallow (sheep fat), so… roll credits!
XD lmao
But speaking on facts this was just an immediate cause Rebellion would have rose anyway.
@@Believer7781 no it was tallow and beeswax. Its a rumour blown out of proportion. To be fair, the company did mistreat their sepoys and locals. Its no small wonder they revolt.
Contrary to what public thinks, not all indians revolt. It was mostly done by sepoys in delhi and locals around it in mughal area. The punjab sikhs and rajputs still fight for the company. (My guess they hate the mughals even more than the british). Indians at this time not yet developed a national identity. It was conglomerations of feudal kingdoms & maratha principality. Different ethnic groups will have different interest.
It is a never proven rumor that spread among the Indian sepoys that the cartridges are greased with beef tallow or pork lard. When the sepoys demands proof, the British authority refuses to do so and even suggests that the sepoys make their own cartridges. This action reinforces the rumor and become a catalyst for the Mutiny of 1857.
It's actually the First War of Independence 1857 and not the 'Mutiny'
@@adamyasingh3713 only in India
@@adamyasingh3713 we can call it first war of independence and sepoy mutiny also don't matter
And forcing Christianity down the throats of hindus. Giving preferential treatment to muslims over hindus
@@adamyasingh3713 The greec story was fake they revolted to finish British rule.
RIP Mangal Panday u shall be remembered always
Dont use RIP for freedom fighters
He was a traitor and a murderer.
@@ayushpandey9353 why can't we use RIP?
@@jurtra9090 they are always in our heart!
@@educational2134sounds cringe
He forgot percussion cap
True
@FUCK your feelings There is no such thing. These are percussion cap guns, prior to that were flint-lock guns, which were obsolete during those times.
Yes I noticed it too 😊😁
@@hp2084 The maynard tape primer system could be called an "auto capper", a few other systems were made too. But none for the enfield. That was just a joke
@@hp2084 R/Wooosh
Britain thinks it has the best rifles
Prussian army:*laughs in Needle guns*
Henry rifle: Am i a joke to you?
Hell it’s even funnier because the needle rifle was patterned before the Enfield, a breechloader created before a cap lock muzzle loader
@Maron Jon r/whoooosh
@Maron Jon stop making me cry
@@lehrasaquian6864 Never gonna give you up never gonna make you cry
Urban legend. It wasn't animal fat. Far too expensive a commodity to use in cartridges.
Too expensive for cartridges but cheap enough to be used for a cutting oil?
If the Company were to make Cartridge for the average soldier then it will need to be cheap and easily mass-produce
@@missymiami6798 Animals fats were not expensive in 19c Britain where those cartridges would have been made. They used them for all kinds of things; soaps, cosmetics, cutting oils, waterproofing, fuel, preservatives, food, axle grease... the list goes on. Lard and tallow would have been commonplace during this period in history in any place that did heavy trade with Britain, might expect animal fats to be found on the products from there if they needed some kind of oil/grease on them. It was not at all unreasonable for the soldiers to think the cartridges could be greased with lard or tallow. Whether or not they actually were, I cannot say.
@@jermainerace4156 This is India, not Britain.
@@infinitecanadian No kidding, but where do you think the cartridges came from?
Ironically, the paper was sealed with beeswax and the bullets greased with tallow (from goats and sheep). An order was issued stating that the sepoys did not have to put those in their mouths.
Typical. Brown mans word? Bollywood sucks
Rumors spread like fire when people are this gullible
A damn shame that so many people died because of a simple misunderstanding.
@@jamesharding3459 Well said.
@@jamesharding3459 What misunderstanding? Colonialism? LUL Do not mistake the kindle for the firewood.
One thing to note is that it wasn't just the greased cartridge rumors that started the rebellion, but a number of other societal, cultural, and religious issues related to colonialism, imperialism, and the British Empire's spreading of christianity in the Indian sub-continent to the detriment of Hindu and Muslims.
the british never spread christianity in india though. they were aware of the problems that would cause and specifically forbade missionarys to work there.
@@Nekroleinchen Nopr they didn't.Actually it were they who encouraged the missionaries.
@@tanmaygupte525 you are confusing the british with the portuguese. almost all christians today in india are either catholics from goa or native christians in the south. only a few people in the east converted to protestantism and that was their own decision.the british had almost no presence there
@@Nekroleinchen Nope there are Christians in other areas too.It were british who allowed the Christian missionaries.Being a law student it's a part of my syllabus to study about the british colonial days.
@@tanmaygupte525 not according to indian census though
It Sounds Strange from 0:47 - 3:42, When a British Speaks A Foreign Language instead of English.
It's called accent
Englishmen learnt hindi but didn't learn their accent, so yeah.
He was speaking hindi in british accent
@@vanshthakkar722 yeah that’s correct
2:15
हर कोई समजेगा।
1:16
BEST PROMOTIOM EVER
😂😂
😂😂
Xdddd
" regular cartidges aren't enough, you need ayurvedic!!
Presenting, ayurvadic patanjali cartidge!!!1:16"
0:46 notice that eerie shooting target
Short slendermen
SCP-096
@@RealMiia containment breach.
@@kakalimukherjee3297 They have always been there throughout our history, overlooking every important incident in history.
Sirenheads spotted
Greased cartridge was one of the immediate reason but there were more social economical and imperial reason behind the rebel it was said that" India was sitting on the mountain of gunpowder and the rumour of greased cartridge lit the fire"
You are right. The greased cartridge issu was like the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. Both are the catalyst of war, but before it happened, there are of social and political issues
But they used paper cartridges in napoleonic war
Wait an indian movie without musicals.... WHOT!?
Wrooong. there's a musical in this movie lol
@@Jupiter.141 Are u fucking kidding me m8?
@@benjaminrojas6880 hes not kidding xD
@@ottersirotten4290 My god :c
Just watch the full film there id one on thr RUclips
1:24 Every ad ever
Smosh?
Yes
@@catmagedsproductions1998 lel
😅
It reminds me of soap commercials
Kinda crazy that just 12 yrs later these super advanced muzzle loaders would be obsolete
I think by the 1850s (the time period this movie is set in) the muzzleloader was already obselete by the 1841 Prussian Breechloading Needlerifle
The East India Company supplied their Indian subjects with outdated weaponry, exactly because of things happening such as a mutiny. The regular white British army received the most up to date weaponry.
@@arandomperson5434 That Dreyse rifle was around but not in mass production or generally speaking available in other countries, as the Prussians were said to be highly protective of it. With that being said when brass cartridges started becoming more of a thing in the 1860s (also an 1840s invention) did you see a push to start switching over to other breech or trap door loading firearms. The Brits made a major switch to this sort of weaponry for mass formations in 1871 with the Martini-Henry.
@@karlkrump6634 Yes. The main problem with the Dreyse was that the needle used to ignite the powder was fragile and had to be replaced every 6-12 shots
@@arandomperson5434yeah but the Needle rifle was like a Phaser weapons or Rail gun by today's standards
0:20
Dialogue : what the bloody hell is going on
Subtitles : what the heck is going on
ಠಿ_ಠ
🤣😹🤣😹
4:44 now that is one hell of a beautiful shot. The soldier puts his gun, and his loyalty over his comrades, literally.
Gun didn't even look like it fired, just some powder.
@@georgewashington132 Oh well, it is still a movie
Even tho the music is a bit too much over the top
According to the movie it was more of the friendship...
That's why we lost First War of Independence 1857 because Some Indians kept their loyalty with Britishers unlike USA.
How Mizos got the word "Sipai" in reference to a member of the armed forces.
The Turkish word "Sipahi" somehow found its way into India and there were the Sepoys. Then the Mizo forefathers somewhat heard of the word "Sepoy" when the British step foot on the Lushai Hills and there we acquired the word "Sipai"
@Nimit Hegde Funny part is 2000 of them immigrated to Israel under Aliyah.
Not a Turkish word. It's a Persian word. After the Persianization of Turks and the Early Mughals they both carried these words into their languages.
Mughals used Sipahi for their soldiers and the British got it from them for their own Indian soldiers.
Nice but sipaahi is Persian word
@Nimit Hegde Why do you and other indigenous people care if we abandoned our animist belives or not 😒.We have no connection with you guys whatsoever nor does our forefathers,if we want we will belive we are a bird or a pig its our choice 🐦🐷
@@ishanbajpai6940 Yes Mughals which means Mongols in Persian were actually Persianized Turks. Weird but true.
Most of the British indian army soldiers were purabiya... They won entire India for British.. Mangal pandey was also a purabiya.. After 1857 revolt, britishers limited recruitment of purabiyas..
Not all were Purabiyas. Only the Bengal Army was comprised of Purabiyas who were peasant soldiers from Awadh in Uttar Pradesh.
@@nimishsharma408 Awadh is not purbiya.
@@harshmishra3214 Read it properly.......the soldiers from Awadh were called Purabiyas in the Bengal army of the EIC.
@@nimishsharma408 They might have been called by British. But we are not Purubiyas. Its people of eastern UP (Purvanchal) whose language is Purabiya/Bhojpuri.
@@harshmishra3214 Whatever, but the fact is that the people of Awadh fought against the British bravely in the first war of independence.
So much wrong here. No proper percussion cap handling, spilling powder during loading, and then they put a round ball instead of a miniè conical into the rifles.
Pritchet not minié
I was wondering the same.
@TREVOR WILSON They were not! Have you ever shot an Enfield rifle musket? I have. I used to own one. Shot live rounds as well as blank loads. You must be thinking of the 1855 Springfield which used the Maynard tape primer. Used in the American Civil War as well as the Enfield, 1861 Springfield and the Spencer repeating rifle.
@TREVOR WILSON I think you're full of shit. Where'd you learn this? Video games?
@TREVOR WILSON Like I said; I OWNED one and shot it alot. I've been in the black powder hobby for almost twenty years. I know muzzleloaders, both percussion and flintlock.
Well, thank you Simple History
British officer: The new enfield rifle is the best rifle in the world.
Prussian Dreyse needle gun: Are you sure about that?!
I agree the needle gun was far superior but this was I think before the needle gun was developed
@@neelamsubba4296Prussian dreyse needle rifles were invented in 1836 by german gunsmith Johann Nikolaus von Dreyse hence the name of the gun, and since enfield rifles were made in 1857 maybe the film makers just got some misinformation
Mangal Pandey is the legend of Historical year 1857. It was he who first began the great uprising War of 1857 by attacking on Adjutant of the 34th Native Infantry at Barrackpore on March 29, 1857. Who all agree ? ❤
1. the Enfield Rifle did not replace the Brown Bess (standard smoothbore flintlock musket from ca 1740 to 1840), which had already been replaced by the smooth bore Percussion cap musket of 1842.
2. As regular infantry, they would use the full length three band 1853 pattern Enfields, not the shorter two Band 1858 model - that one would usually go to sharpshooters (where it would also not replace the brown bess, but the brunswick rifle or - in some indian regiments - the jacobs rifle instead).
3. the great novelty that made the enfield rifle such a big thing back then was its conical, hollow based minie bullet - these troops instead load round ball, which would be used in smooth bore muskets.
4. in order to make the rifle ready to fire, I'd put on a percussion cap - but I am not a drill sergeant of the british E.I.C, so what do I know...
JosipRadnik1 Nerd!
@@bingisbahn3374 Just shut it, just cause he knows what he's talking about doesn't mean you have to heckle him.
@@bingisbahn3374 ;-)
They were not regular infantry they were sepoys. EIC sepoys were not equipped to the same standard as its European regiments much less Crown forces.
**Honorable* E.I.C.
This Cartridges brought hindu and muslim both under one Flag ❤️.
The hatred at the slaughter of the holy cow and the disgust of tasting haram pork
Until 1947...
@@kv5346 true. Colonialism sucks
@@kv5346 it lasted 5 mins literally . 1947, it was not there in by 1858..
It turns out there was never any animal fat on them. They were brought together in ignorance.
Britain be like
OUR Indian fellas are so Excellent at firing a Springfield musket
That they save our money on precussion caps
hey just to let you know, for about 800 years before the british we tried to resist you people
They are exited but at firing on them😆😆🤣
@@defenderofjustice3435 no we defeat this people in the border of Sindh they never came here those people are central Asian faking tribe Turks who belongs to mongols and we take a long time to stop those mongols and free ourself
You know half of British army during first and second World war was Indians
@@TheVinayakvenuthey did train them, so had to use them
And it's all because of gavrilo princip and the failed Austrian painter it happened
And recently Benjamin netanyahu said a Palestinian convinced the Austrian painter to get rid if Jewish people
Subedar: 2:18 hum ise muh me nahi daal sakte
Angrez: Fir kidhar daloge 😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Imagine a time paradox WHEN THE AXEL DIDN'T BREAK
That's an other What If episode :p
It was not just the Axel
Then the revolt would be under another cause
@@doubleuuu Nothing would happen, and no revolt over nothing
@@SStupendous actually I would happen but a bit later as there was already must resentment amongst the Indian rulers and people, The Issue of the greased cartridges was a spark to the revolt and even if it didn't happen then another thing would provide the spark.
The great Mangal Pandey the hero ❤️
Mangal Pandey ji legend the aur hamesha rahenge logo ke dil mai 👍👍🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️
Heroes don't murder.
@@infinitecanadian He killed the British in self defence and for patriotism.What do you expect,sit and watch while the British did whatever they did?Are you 8 years old or something?
@@immortal98638 Have you any idea what it's like to actually kill a human being?
@@infinitecanadian well in that case, when N@zi Germany attacks U.K and France, they shouldn't declare war on them and let them what they were doing.
4 a second I thought it was hot dogs dropout 0:25
I proud to be from Bagi land Ballia where the first Indian revolutionist Mangal Pandey was Borned🇮🇳🇮🇳
I am an Indian muslim and I respect mangal pandey and all indians who revolted against the British
Could've been Portuguese or French or even japanese in alternative universe
haan mc muslim likhna zaroori hai kyunki vote to pakistan k liye kiya tha
the best part about this movie, is that when Gurkha's where given this rifle with the same cartridge, dipped in beef tallow, they had no qualms about using them. In fact they made fun of the Indian troops, as in calling them the "Whinging" Indians, dot not feather.
Well I'm a Gorkha living in India so yeah pretty much we're okay with any kind of meat . The situation was different in 1857 it was about going against the belief of two major entire communities , the British have to accept that mistake at least
@@definitelynotwu4811 its unclear whether the cartridges were actually greased with lard and tallow since previous cartridges were greased in beeswax. however on wikipedia it is stated that one batch was purposely made with lard and tallow after the sepoys complained about the rumours. So perhaps one idiot officer wanting to give the finger to his men, stirred up an entire rebellion
Cause they can eat any kind of meat they want and their religion doesn't tell them what to eat and what not to eat. They even eat cockroaches and various other abominations. Yuck!
@@mahirshahriyar545 yuck your ass. If they are eating insects they are again one step ahead of you. Its best protein conversion system there is.
@@pranavvaishnave7648 Bro you nailed it.
This movie Was far better than current days biopics.
Nice to see that Bhushan from Harshad Mehta was a soldier in his previous life 😊
I love his Hindi accent. 😂
Biting the cartridge would be swiftly dumped, with the rifle drill for the 1853 Enfield calling for the cartridge top to be torn off by the fingers on the level with the muzzle. That said, the propaganda effects of claiming that the cartridges were greased with cow fat AND pig fat simultaneously were huge.
this
The question is, why did they come to India? Poor chaps are now ensconced in the tiny island fearing winter as Russia puts tap on the oil supply 😂
@@upadhyayrathiraj1518 @Upadhyay Rathi Raj Because, as colonizers do, they were looking for land to conquer for the purpose of expansion and building up their wealth. They were simply the first modern empire to gain a proper foothold there.
Anybody else could have done it had they had the resources, expertise and military to do so. Even pre-Columbian empires such as the Aztecs colonized and massacred their neighbours in a manner far more sinister than the British have ever done.
And should you really be pointing fingers, when your own country is still in general turmoil?
@@JostVanWair How is India in general turmoil? We just recently launched our 3rd mission to the moon, our economy is doing really well despite the useless war in Ukraine, and we're gearing up for the next general elections. Do you even understand what turmoil is?
@@yugmathakkar4023 well this comment was a long time ago but you need to look past the surface value of things. I live in a 3rd world country myself and despite the nonsense our politicians say about how we are "the world's first sustainable country" we still suffer from high amounts of poverty, poof infrastructure and educational opportunities.
India is a beautiful country but you cannot deny the fact that beyond all of the space flights and development, about 60% of India's population is totally impoverished...
Those moustaches are magnificent lads.
All people need good stories to feel good about themselves, never let the facts come in the way of a good story is a prime Movie mantra.
Along with that, the sepoys were also dissapointed with the injustice happening with the farmers because many of thier families lived in villages, with all problems combined, it lead ot the great revolt of may 1857
I am triggered by the sheer historical inaccuracy of the musketry here. THERE WAS NO ROUNDBALL FOR THE P53
FOOL ENFIELD 1853 WAS SIMPLE YOU TEAR THE CARTRIDGE PUT IN THE GUNPOWDER LOAD THE BALL OF 5.77 SOMETHING AND THEN PERCUSSION CAP THEN FIRE BOOM SIMPLE THERE WAS ROUNDBALL ENFIELD 1853 SPRINGFIELD 1853 DIDNT HAVE THAT BOTH ARE DIFFRENT FOOL
yep
@@navinagarwal8880 how could anyone take you seriously when you can't even type .577 the caliber of the rifle correctly
@@samellowery simple mistake, doesn’t discredit them.
Also I see you’ve edited your comment, hmmm you made a spelling mistake?
@@ZelenskyPlane yes because when I make a mistake I do fix it I put in .557 instead of .577 plus he talks about a springfield 53 no such thing ever existed there's a model 42 and a model 55 no 53.
Who knew that a rumour could start a rebellion
PUT YOUR MASK ON again
@@mochiebellina8190 lol
Who knew that a company ie EIC would rule a subcontinent?
Fun fact: During the mutiny Hindu and Muslim rebel troups took over several British armories, and used the new ammunition without hesitation. So, the real reason for the uprising and the massacres lay elsewhere.
British : we have the best rifle Enfield breaks down like the Royal Enfield motorcycle 😅
Germans : hold my Geweer, it’s built like the Panzer 😎
What
British in the 1850s: what is a "panzer"?
The Nädelgewehr is inferior to the French Chassepot rifle.
@@darnit1944 Yea its also invented 25 years earlier
my school told me watch this and i thought it would be boring as always but it was really good
4:47 wow the gun has no recoil i want to order this gun
XD
The Rifle used in this movie 🎬 was produced in India 🇮🇳, look up Windless Steel or Military Heritage, they sell for around $400 - $600 USD
Your videos are very clear I want more clips like this from you🤗💕
5:34 really went serious.
1:47 there’s no cap… the gun would never have fired 🤣
A company can never take over a country you are playing cyberpunk way to much.
Britishers: 😅
Afghanistan to Myanmar and Sri lanka and hong kong and Israel
Amd Australia and new Zealand and more
the soldiers had very clear skin for someone living in 1850s and being poor and working in sun whole day
Nah your skin is just bad
You travelling in time to see ??
4:18 Gautam Ghambir
KL Rahul
None of them
HE WAS IN SCAM 1992
Just after firing demo... next plan and we can see no gun smoke. And before that, he forget to place the cap.
Not all the Indian infantry weapons were downgraded. The Sikh and Ghurka units continued to use British military standard.
Not true for sikh. Cows had same importance in Sikhs as compared to Hindus. Things changed for them after 1970-1989s cultural issues.
Even today Sikhs and Jains have higher percentage of vegetarian than Hindus in India.
And majority of Gurkhas are Hindus. I doubt they would have continued without any problem.
@@moonlighmax However, during the 1857 mutiny the Sikhs and Gurkha troops stayed loyal, so they got the equipment that was standard for the rest of the British forces. They didn't believe the rumors about cartridges being intentionally greased with religiously objectionable substances.
Actually, the EIC had provided almost all native troops with modern guns (of the era), but after the revolt ended and the EIC broke, the British realised the problem of another disastrous revolt so they introduced a policy where almost all Indian troops will be provided with lesser quality weapons since they didn't need modern guns anyway because they were no major wars that were gonna come. However, in WW1, all the troops of the empire had to be given modern weapons for the war.
So Indian is okay with being colonized and forced to fight for Britain's war but this is a too much for them...
Bruh, India was never forced into war lmao
Well in the beginning common folk thought British Raj is just another feudal system to replace a previous dynasty...the colonisation realisation happen after this revolt
this is way before ww1 and ww2 where Indians were taken to fight for Britain
but somehow british managed to change this to 'volunteered'
Well if you read the history of the subcontinent, everything happened extremely slowly, too slowly for most people to take notice of what was happening. Just think about this timeline, the Brits got trading rights in 1600, their first factory was set up after 12 long years. The first battle that got them rights to collect taxes in Bengal was in 1757 (That's 157 years after they got trading rights). Over the next 100 years their power grew, they isolated and conquered our retarded kingdoms (and mind you there were hundreds of them, with lots of in-fighting) we never put up a united front against them. This movie is about what happened in 1857 which is 257 years after the Brits put foot in our country. This story isn't something like WW1 or WW2 which you can trace over a few years (1870s to 1914 in case of WW1) & (1920s to 1945 in case of WW2). When history moves so slow that the story is told over hundreds of years, no man can foretell how things will turn out.
We can't foretell the face of the earth after 15 years from today let along how things would be 250 years from now.
@@breastmilkgaming the British military has never forced men to join the military or conscription it only happened on rare occasions for example in the later years of ww1. that is why the British military historically has been small because unlike france etc we did not do conscription so piss off
Dreyse needle gun: am i a joke to you?
God his Hindi is so painful to hear.
@Yvonne Steiner Too late now. I would’ve definitely found some
Way better than this guy for sure.
A military leader is supposed to sound tough
Year that is it!revolution!
That day mangal pandey didn't died alone entire east India company died and British crown bring there rule
If it were successful there would be no British.
Just remember: the Sepoys had no problem biting the tops off to shoot the officers.
They shot the officers with the old muskets
They used old musket
oops, he forget to put 'percussion cap' before cocking the rifle!
Me when,
Brit speak English: kalm
Brit speak Hindi in weird accent: "oH no iT is an
iMpeRiAliSt bRiTisH oFficEr!!"
Senior British military "leadership" at its finest. Same as it ever was!!!
Well this was the East India Company's military, not the British military
you know, that is magic percussion lock gun,
they forgot to put the percussion cap in the nipple but still can fire the gun! LoL
बो तो सब ठीक है।
Cap nahi lgaya mangal pande ne.
बंदूक चल भी गई 😊😊😊😊😊
That street is too clean to be an Indian street.
It was clean back then you can find it in documentary
@@saffronwarrior8253 Probably because it was under British rule
@@marneus how naive can you be? Well guess what we should be grateful to British for famine which got 2 million of our people killed, also got millions of our indian soldiers killed in WW2 that wasn't even our war, nothing was great about British rule, don't judge us Indians if you have no understanding of what we went through to get our freedom
@@saffronwarrior8253 you should be grateful for trying to teach you hygiene. Way more indians die from the unhygienic conditions in India. BTW, how many people do live there?
@@marneus lol i laugh at your knowledge you nothing know about indian history half knowledge is dangerous kid dont be so foolish
Yikes! All the soldiers are shown without a cartridge pouch or even a percussion cap pouch, and (at 2:15) the "Subedars" are wearing a string of pearls?
Subedars were rich man they can string of pearls
Bharosa karna aur bharosa ka fayda uthane walon se badla lene ka josh ...✌️✌️✌️..
Fun fact : The east Indian company is now owned by an Indian .
I do not think it exists anymore.
@ No it does not. ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Stock_Dividend_Redemption_Act_1873 ) ( api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1873/mar/26/east-india-companys-stock-redemption-of ) Parliament dissolved it in 1873 by the "East India Stock Dividend Redemption Act 1873".
@@johnnotrealname8168 okay. i was wrong it seems. I also heard this joke on whatsapp so thought it must exist!
@ Perhaps it is a different East India Company. I did not mean to be rude. Good goings Sir and God Bless You.
@@johnnotrealname8168 lol the source was fake you dipshit 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That George looks a lot like current prince of UK
He looks like sheamus from wwe
"Phir kidher daloge"
Why I laughed so hard ?
@Steve Wolcott 2:18
Btw yeah you whites better be monolingual
@Steve Wolcott the comment reads the same question
@Steve Wolcott oh so you're east asian
@Steve Wolcott you can just read the captions
@Steve Wolcott Never mind
Freedom fighter mangal pandey
ಜೈ ಹಿಂದ್ 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
I read somewhere that the British army tore cartridge ends with their hands rather than their mouths when loading enfield muskets. Any truth to this?
Probably too many cases of broken teeth, no doubt even a few cases of swallowing the bullet
Why not you can tear it with hand too, but it was mouth because in one hand you are supposed to crary rifle!.. During battle it will be not easy to operate as u mentioned!
Later on, yes, they switched to tearing instead of biting.
1:28 "kartushka" - made me almost in Russian 😂
Surprised to see Captain Flint still alive after the Fall of Nassau
I Realized When The British soldier Fire The Musket The Soldier Was Not Inserting The Percussion Cap In The Rifke LOL
His Hindi accent is hilarious 😂
BTW now we are together against Terrorism
🇮🇳🇬🇧🇺🇲🇷🇺
Long live Martyred Mangal Pandey
4:10 & 4:16
If you feel insulted then leave the British Army, a Soldier cannot put "what people will say about me" above his duties
It's not about his reputations, it's about his religion
Thts desertion which will get you punished
The British Army wasn't in India at the time.
This war basically ruined the East Indian Company. Good job rebels
Then british fcked tue rebels
@@usa5450white alien🤢🤢
The first war of independence. It started here and ended with Naval Revolt in 1946. Mangal Pandey to BC Dutt
Who was BC Dutt ?
Today, the Brits and Ind. Are both in the same comment section peace fully and kinda feeling awkward
I could be wrong, but I didn't see a percussion cap on the rifle. Has anyone else noticed this?
That line "zor se thoko" 😂
Jai managal pandey 💕🙏😭🙏💕😭🙏💕😭💕🙏🙏💕❤️❤️🙏💕🙏🙏🙏💕💕💕🙏💕💕 bharat Kai first tiger 🐅🙏🐅 Hindu Sher.... 💯😡🇮🇳🙏🐅💯✨😱🤫😰
Fudu sher
are you mad?
Are you sad, mad, scared, keeping a secret, in love, praying, 100 years old or a tiger
I'm rolling in laughter hearing the British soldier speak hindi
Yeah no shit, mastering a language like Hindi is astronomically hard for native English speakers.
@@JostVanWairand Portuguese? Uzbek?
@@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv What are you on about?
@@JostVanWair oh those people were also in south Asia
So different accents different languages
I love British
curry fighting for fish chips
There are lots of keyboard experts out here who think the cartridge just had to torn apart instead of biting it
Did they vote for Joe Biden? In a battlefield formation when things get real , it's impractical. Biting was the quickest way
perhaps you should read a British manual of arms before throwing stones 🤔
@@samellowery Another I need a source soyboy
Fair enough
"Company ko jalaakar Raakh kr dungaa." Goosebumps 🔥🔥
Besides ignorance of the fulminate cap replacement it is a pretty accurate scene
Edit, just realised he droped the pritchet directly in
In reality the paper was greased ( by something ) rather than the miniè grooves so you would pour thepowder, flip the cartrige and put the other end in, then snap the top of the paper off and ram it
This is why the British army changed to color ended cartridges right? In the 1860's the cartridges would become tearable within the muzzle.
it turned out to be faster as well.
The guy who bite the cartridge looked like an Ottoman Turk
He's Amir Khan . 🌹
This was the most dumbest movie of Amir khan. Mangal directly killed the officer.
The grandfather of my grandfather was from Mangal pandeys village
Now that I think bout it, this is the best movie ever produced about Indian independence so far. It is unbiased, and is respectful compared to trashy garbage like Manikarnika or Bhagat singh. The uniforms are accurate, and considering this movie had a limited budget, it's pretty good. It's not over the top or anything, and unlike most Indian movies, there are some few British men we can sympathise with. And I think the only reason why the British are still somehow being portrayed as baddies are that it would not be popular in my country of India as people here are sensitive and dumb, so they had to be a little biased here. Yes, the loading is incorrect but the gun is atleast kind of close to the real thing
Change your rotten mind
Would you present *some* Nazis as sympatheic good guys who were "just following orders"? Why should Indians portray the British in good light when all they did was rape, loot and plunder the entire subcontinent for 200 years? Why are you such a pathetic bootlicker of colonizers?