Sears Catalog Spring/Summer 1986 *Women's Fashion + Shoes* | Cole Chickering

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 окт 2024

Комментарии • 21

  • @donnaregan5252
    @donnaregan5252 2 месяца назад

    Being a product of the eighties I still do the matching thing with my wardrobe pieces. Hard habit to break. Love these trips down memory lane

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  2 месяца назад

      I think color matching is okay - I do it too. These days we just call it ~color palette minimalism~

  • @megdavis9192
    @megdavis9192 5 месяцев назад +1

    It's wild to see how much the fashion industry has changed in my lifetime. A hardcover catalog, unfathomable now. Thank you Cole! I'll be dreaming of shoulder pads and bend over jeans tonight!

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  5 месяцев назад +1

      I think its charming that Sears anticipated their customers really treasuring this catalog, so much so that they hardbound it in advance. Legacy mindset!

    • @megdavis9192
      @megdavis9192 5 месяцев назад

      I agree! They don't make things like they used to...

  • @sidneyg8470
    @sidneyg8470 5 месяцев назад

    So fun! Love your shirt color combo.

  • @dolliegurl4607
    @dolliegurl4607 Месяц назад

    Mushrooms??!? I remember having that exact pair pictured, the one on the foot. And YES they were super comfy and lasted forever! Payless did knock offs of that and other styles from the Mushroom brand. Man, I wish they would bring those back 😢

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  Месяц назад

      Mushrooms is such a good name for a shoe. Soft and durable just like a mushroom!

  • @LostinMayberry
    @LostinMayberry 5 месяцев назад +1

    I think I got my HS graduation shoes out of that catalog!

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  5 месяцев назад

      OMG! What did they look like?

    • @LostinMayberry
      @LostinMayberry 5 месяцев назад

      @@ColeChickering White… low heel ugly white shoes. (#3 on 359!!) When it comes to wide and large shoes you take what you can get. Even now that hasn’t really changed much. Pantyhose were mandatory!

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  5 месяцев назад

      @@LostinMayberry LOL! I don't think those are ugly!

  • @esotericexplorersmartinez493
    @esotericexplorersmartinez493 5 месяцев назад

    i love vintage nightgowns and i have slept in them but yes i noticed really quickly you have to wear underwear or undergarments like leggings or shirts because it rides up and night and gets super annoying, But they cute and can be very warm especially the winter ones :)

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  5 месяцев назад +1

      They are so much cuter than pretty much any other pajama situation I can think of. Maybe the cuteness trumps the twisty tangly sleeping problems!

  • @LostinMayberry
    @LostinMayberry 5 месяцев назад

    Sears was a slightly more upscale than Kmart (duh) or Jcpenneys at the time. If you notice the prices aren’t all that cheap, quite a few of those dressed are $45 or so. My wage in 1986 was $5.26. Average was $7

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  5 месяцев назад

      Yes, I did notice these prices are not so far off from clothing prices we see today! But I'm sure these were way better quality.

  • @WinterWind
    @WinterWind 5 месяцев назад

    I swear Stefanie Powers was dressed better on Hart to Hart than in this collection lol

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  5 месяцев назад

      Ha! I know. I LOVED Hart to Hart, I remember watching it as a child on Nick at Night.

  • @fashionlover1732
    @fashionlover1732 5 месяцев назад

    well,menswear,mens shoes and workoutwear is the most interesting part xd
    idc abt the home stuff xd

    • @ColeChickering
      @ColeChickering  5 месяцев назад +1

      Menswear to come for sure. The catalog guys we spied were really selling those looks. 🔥