If you are really making DNA from scratch, make your own bases and side chains that have the correct chilarity. Then assemble them in test tubes. Then it's from scratch.
@@PetaSchuster Craig Venter and his team spent 10 years synthesizing a bacterial DNA of about 1 Mb. The bacteria can do it in less than an hour. DNA is a more complex code language than a spoken language. But code just happens by accident according to evolution. Craig Venter's project is evidence of intelligent design.
@@fasterpastor1000 What is your argument? Bacteria can copy their chromosomes and plasmids using enzymes (that we use in PCR etc.). But this method lets us print custom oligonucleotides (our own design), it is significantly slower than replication, that is why we use enzymes/living bacteria to make more copies, but we need that initial sequence so we can duplicate it. And no, it doesn't take years to print it out, just like hours.
@@fasterpastor1000 Also no, DNA code is SIGNIFICANTLY easier than spoken language, it doesn't have thousands of expressions, it has 64 different codones, that code for 20 different amino acids. So if you want to call this language, it only has 64 words, most of them synonymous to each other.
exactly. from scratch. have you ever cooked biscuits? or pizzas? making the dough from scratch literally requires you to pour in flour water and yeast lol
@@MrOvergryph no please be more specific, if you want to creat something from scratch you dont use the same thing you are creating to creat it, say i want to make a door from scratch, do i bring another door and paint it and tell you i made from scratch?
@MTXSHO9732vV8SHO no materials, no DNA. how did nature make DNA by coincidence though? You guys just throw some silly theories about how first DNA was formed
@@Ahmad_E_Alshammari The video is simply shit quality, but that is to be expected from fox news...What they actually do is to try to make alternative genome to that of yeast, but improved/more ordered. They print oligonucleotides, and then stich them together to create whole yeast genome that they then use to replace the natural yeast genome. The point of this is to improve methods for genetic modification, the actual product will most likely not be used for anything outside of lab work. Pretty cool stuff
if this is possible doesn't that make DNA questionable in the justice system. I have thought for a long time that DNA in court case's was bullshit, and could be created to convict or frame a person for a crime. But I have thought that creating DNA was bullshit, and how many people are in prison falsely imprisoned because of DNA
What? How could this be used to incriminate someone? You don't know someone's DNA until you sequence sample, so if you get a sample, why would you make it from scratch rather than use that sample to incriminate said individual?
Super success super congrats. We need to build self replicating synthetic living computers to attack all problems and let it grow to the scale of universe and create alternative universes with better laws of physics to save our species from all possible extinctions.
exactly. from scratch. have you ever cooked biscuits? or pizzas? making the dough from scratch literally requires you to pour in flour water and yeast lol
power? What power?! you create DNA from an existing living thing called yeast, you have the advantage of having all the elements around us, add gravity and the sun, add everything else that sustains life in the earth, add machines that do the gene editing, lastly you have an intelligent designer/scientist; that is not AT ALL the same as how it was when the universe began. it's impressive, yes, but not Godlike. this video is proof for intelligent design to account for the origin of the universe or life on earth.
OK, so where's my dinosaur?
Same
If you are really making DNA from scratch, make your own bases and side chains that have the correct chilarity. Then assemble them in test tubes. Then it's from scratch.
They literally add base by base
@@PetaSchuster Craig Venter and his team spent 10 years synthesizing a bacterial DNA of about 1 Mb. The bacteria can do it in less than an hour. DNA is a more complex code language than a spoken language. But code just happens by accident according to evolution. Craig Venter's project is evidence of intelligent design.
@@fasterpastor1000 What is your argument? Bacteria can copy their chromosomes and plasmids using enzymes (that we use in PCR etc.). But this method lets us print custom oligonucleotides (our own design), it is significantly slower than replication, that is why we use enzymes/living bacteria to make more copies, but we need that initial sequence so we can duplicate it. And no, it doesn't take years to print it out, just like hours.
@@fasterpastor1000 Also no, DNA code is SIGNIFICANTLY easier than spoken language, it doesn't have thousands of expressions, it has 64 different codones, that code for 20 different amino acids. So if you want to call this language, it only has 64 words, most of them synonymous to each other.
"As in the days of Noah", comes to mind....
DNA, the building blocks of life.
Thats cheating
From SCRATCH, they started with YEAST.
exactly. from scratch. have you ever cooked biscuits? or pizzas? making the dough from scratch literally requires you to pour in flour water and yeast lol
@@MrOvergryph no please be more specific, if you want to creat something from scratch you dont use the same thing you are creating to creat it, say i want to make a door from scratch, do i bring another door and paint it and tell you i made from scratch?
You do it then... It's easy, just watch Joe Rogan and you'll be an expert in no time.
@MTXSHO9732vV8SHO no materials, no DNA. how did nature make DNA by coincidence though? You guys just throw some silly theories about how first DNA was formed
@@Ahmad_E_Alshammari The video is simply shit quality, but that is to be expected from fox news...What they actually do is to try to make alternative genome to that of yeast, but improved/more ordered. They print oligonucleotides, and then stich them together to create whole yeast genome that they then use to replace the natural yeast genome. The point of this is to improve methods for genetic modification, the actual product will most likely not be used for anything outside of lab work. Pretty cool stuff
"These machines take baker's yeast to assemble DNA".. what?
ok i saw it now can i have my dinosaur too? :>
Same
what's a scratch
if this is possible doesn't that make DNA questionable in the justice system. I have thought for a long time that DNA in court case's was bullshit, and could be created to convict or frame a person for a crime. But I have thought that creating DNA was bullshit, and how many people are in prison falsely imprisoned because of DNA
What? How could this be used to incriminate someone? You don't know someone's DNA until you sequence sample, so if you get a sample, why would you make it from scratch rather than use that sample to incriminate said individual?
Super success super congrats. We need to build self replicating synthetic living computers to attack all problems and let it grow to the scale of universe and create alternative universes with better laws of physics to save our species from all possible extinctions.
This is village level 500 in Lego Fortnite
I never knew Yeast is also called as "Scratch".
exactly. from scratch. have you ever cooked biscuits? or pizzas? making the dough from scratch literally requires you to pour in flour water and yeast lol
Short answer: no
That’s illegal my guy
power? What power?! you create DNA from an existing living thing called yeast, you have the advantage of having all the elements around us, add gravity and the sun, add everything else that sustains life in the earth, add machines that do the gene editing, lastly you have an intelligent designer/scientist; that is not AT ALL the same as how it was when the universe began. it's impressive, yes, but not Godlike. this video is proof for intelligent design to account for the origin of the universe or life on earth.