If you liked this style of video, please check out Gonz's youtube! He did most of the work, scriptwriting, and the voice over as well! He has a ton of really good quality videos! ruclips.net/channel/UCdWQvRH_9RekrZGVmRpT1Iw
You should get in touch with Arlo I mean he would love to talk about this and he has a bigger platform I also think the message could reach Nintendo's ear's if you get someone bigger to talk about this stuff. And yes I did read this comment but you posting this means you most likely agree with the video itself.
for as many times I keep seeing this quote tossed around in these situations it never stops being so right i grew up with Nintendo but I swear would it kill then to just be halfway decent to people
In most cases yes, but a lot of pirates are people living in less fortunate areas (which is completely understandable), and people who are just greedy and don't care (which is just scummy)
I'll never understand how people are totally fine with game-services shutting down when it costs Nintendo literal pennies to keep them running indefinitely.
@@Wheagg "if there's only 300 players" Servers are getting less costly and more efficient by the year so I highly doubt that statement. Since most people switched over to the latest Nintendo systems anyway there's even less reason to not keep the old services running, since the playerbase is accordingly smaller and needs less resources.
To quote Dunkey - Nintendo. They don't understand marketing, they don't understand how to run a business, but they do understand how to make video games.
Nintendo: Downloading ROMs hurt us, so we will take legal meashures to prevent you from doing so, even if that meand you won't experience our old and less popular games. Also Nintendo: We'll add timeframes and make it harder for you to play our games the legal way. It almost as if Nintendo wants their games to end up as abandonware
Nintendo wants to keep their games in their vaults and limit access to them so that they can keep rereleasing the same games over and over again. Why should I buy a nintendo virtual console game if the roms are easily accessible? That's why Nintendo takes a hammer to rom sites like Emuparadise. It makes their old games more exclusive when they finally rerelease them- especially if they put a limited time frame on them to buy them.
@@themarshmalloreo3929 how is more exclusive if they normally rerelease them? month later edit: Ok I guess what you mean is with them taking down emulation sites...which yeah can be annoying. Although if it's piracy? I get taking it down. Especially if there already distributing older games
Found this on an old page of their website: People Making Nintendo Emulators and Nintendo ROMs are Helping Publishers by Making Old Games Available that are No Longer Being Sold by the Copyright Owner. This Does Not Hurt Anyone and Allows Gamers to Play Old Favorites. What's the Problem? The problem is that it's illegal. Copyrights and trademarks of games are corporate assets. If these vintage titles are available far and wide, it undermines the value of this intellectual property and adversely affects the right owner. In addition, the assumption that the games involved are vintage or nostalgia games is incorrect. Nintendo is famous for bringing back to life its popular characters for its newer systems, for example, Mario and Donkey Kong have enjoyed their adventures on all Nintendo platforms, going from coin-op machines to our latest hardware platforms. As a copyright owner, and creator of such famous characters, only Nintendo has the right to benefit from such valuable assets.
@@Anis360-k5p I will say not every game has copyrighted roms though...which would make it easier...so not all online emulation is piracy. like with mother 3 here it seems...plus they surprisingly haven't taken down the fan translation after a decade
Wait... you can talk!? Seriously though, this was a nice little commentary about the Mario anniversary stuff and the whole manufactured scarcity Nintendo is doing for some reason.
This was actually Gonz speaking in the video, lol. Still, if you liked it, you'd probably enjoy some of his other stuff as well ruclips.net/channel/UCdWQvRH_9RekrZGVmRpT1Iw
That's exactly how I feel about Nintendo, I love so many of their games hut but honestly their choices as a company are simply terrible and almost abusive towards their consumers.
Sadly Nintendo is starting to take notes from the company that it does a lot of business with. And that company is Microsoft. Nintendo is learning from one of the most evil companies on earth. They are learning that greed is good, quality doesn't matter just get the money and worry later, and keep vital features like the Virtual Console, web browser, and personalization settings like avatars, chat, and wallpaper keep them out of gamer hands and keep artificially inflating demand by creating a limited run game then taking the money and getting even more down the line in DLC and online. No, you want to make Nintendo better? Get them away from Microsoft, EA and Activision and remember the consumer matters.
Nintendos been getting much more corporate and out of touch since Iwata died. He was probably the most moral man in the corporate world as a whole, and clearly he had a love for his consumers/audience even more so than we loved him which was definitely an extremely high bar. Personally, I think the years to come will decide whether the death of Satoru Iwata will be the death of Nintendo as a whole, and I pray they turn themselves around.
I'm not going to pretend like everything was perfect when Iwata was in charge, but it does feel like some of this stuff wouldn't have happened if he was still around. Iwata also might have been more honest about joycon drift and been more committed to giving people repairs and fixing the issue altogether.
@@BagaJr Things were by no means perfect, as you say. But Nintendo was a much better company morally and and in terms of consumer satisfaction. Ffs the man even cut his own really salary a shit ton as opposed to lay offs when the Wii U flubbed.
@@phoenixtrite5068 That's true. I also always forget Shuntaro Furukawa's name because he's been practically invisible to fans since he took over. All the announcements are handled by other people. It's concerning because it feels like a lack of passion, unlike Iwata who was always there for Directs and all the silly skits.
Last year, there was a fan game called “Mario Royale” that Nintendo ruthlessly took down after only a week of existing. The game was really fun. But that aside, I have no idea what “Mario 35” could be based off of. Nintendo wouldn’t shut down a fan game and then steal their idea to make their own game, right? RIGHT!?
Nah, they don't do this. Like, they shut down roms sites in order to prevent emulation, and then, it was confirmed that Mario 64 and Sunshine were running as emulated ports on Switch. But it is just a coincidence that they created a Mario Royale after shutting down a fanmade Mario Royale. Nothing strange to me.
@@molhosoja They took down Pixelmon then made Pokemon Quest a short time after. It's NOT a coincidence, they're stealing ideas from fans and they take their games away.
@@alemtotodile8128 I was being sarcastic btw. I know nintendo do this shit and act like nothing happened, even if it is something obvious. I didn't played pokémon uranium before it got shut down but the chances that nintendo "used one of those pokemons as reference" is big.
@Patrick Sedler I don’t know what you’re talking about saying Galaxy is mediocre, all 3 of them are great. But yeah the $60 price tag isn’t fair considering Crash and Spyro remakes were built from the ground up and cost $40.
I like Nintendo and their games but I feel as though it’s getting harder and harder to understand them and what they’re doing. It was difficult enough coming to grips that GameFreak and Pokemon company are bad and I don’t want to see Nintendo fall down the same path as them
As a business major in college, what they’re doing is FOMO (Fear of Missing Out), and even as the studying business student that I am, even I’m baffled and confused by the limited availability timeframe...
@@tylerwagner1978, what they're doing makes no sense from a profit standpoint. They know these three games have large followings among their players, and will naturally sell well due to nostalgia and a desire for an HD Switch port. I can't imagine basically limiting the amount of copies is all that smart.
They always drip feed their content. It creates a higher demand and intrinsically increases the value. This is why old nintendo games don't get cheaper. If anything they get more expensive. Twilight princess and skyward sword for the wii are both still $60 and not even in HD. Both are zelda games, nintendo's most successful and renound (behind mario ofc.) Both are older than the last of us. Playstations most successful series (debatable, but I'm pretty sure tlou2 sold more copies than any ps exclusive ever, so there's that.) Yet the last of us is available completely remasted in HD, for a grand total of $15. Again. Twilight princess, 2006, not even HD on the wii, $60. The last of us, 2013, remastered for ps4 in HD, $15. Tbh, nintendo may seem really self righteous for the way they present their games... but they've sort of earned it. The zelda and mario series are both over 30 years old, and every main entry of both series' hold up, and still somehow occasionally break the gaming community. Breath of the wild case and point. And to a lesser degree, Mario odyssey. Nintendo has one thing even the best playstation games don't. The nintendo polish. They excessively check their games for any problems, they pace them seamlessly, and they always start game developmemt with a new core mechanic, which is basically worked on to the point of perfection then implemented as the "gimmick". Then the rest of the game is built out from that. Usually it works out for them. But even when it doesn't... you'll never get the same idea sold to you twice with them. At the very least, each game introduces a completely original gameplay experience, and almost without fail it's going to be fun af. Even if you only play it once. That makes every purchase worth it to me. That's the mark of a company you can trust. They're the most innovative out there and you can't dispute that. That type of game making is so high risk for any company not willing to put the work into the polish such as nintendo, and especially when they don't have the reputation of nintendo to secure most people atleast trying it. So it's always a win win for me.
I just find it weird that at one point did a complete overhaul of mario 64 for the DS, but did minute differences for the 3D all stars versions and not even have the DS version of it.
THE NEWMAKER but they made the original with HD graphics, which wouldve been horrible on today’s screens. The same logic could apply for the DS version as well.
THE NEWMAKER the DS game actually managed to have more polygons and reworked graphics compared to the original. Sure it was made for a smaller screen, but you can also say that a lot of screens around the time of the N64 were smaller than tv’s compared to most today
Not quite, at least for me. There's one reason why: Nintendo doesn't buy other companies and destroy their product for their own gain. Before you say anything, yes, Nintendo did take down Mario Royale. However, being fair, Mario is their product. I don't like the decision, but it's a decision that I at least find fair. When you make a game using someone else's assets that they poured money and hard work into, it's fair for them to ask you to take it down. EA has destroyed several companies that had unique, and fun games (for example, Playfish) by buying the company who owns them and then canceling their games and redirecting you to play their games when you try to go back to those games.
The whole limited thing of this event is really stupid, like actually why, it's so dumb and it makes no sense Like people really want this, and sure you can still buy a physical version of the game a while after march, but it will be so much more expensive i don't understand why Nintendo is doing this
@Dominix J The PS5 will also be hard for people to get enough money to buy it while they need the money to support themselves. This is the Coronavirus! In this case, Sony needs to delay the system.
"Do what you want cause a pirate is free you are a pirate" Damn straight ill enjoy my Paper Mario TTYD on pc cause I cannot play it on the switch. Owned it since release if anyone complains
I sure as hell won't complain. If a company is making no effort to make the games you want to play available, it really is their fault if you have to pirate the game. I feel like I may have to do that in the future when I get into streaming.
They get mad if you use ROMs, but they don't even put these games on their online service.. If everyone is playing pirated games it's because Nintendo doesn't let us play them the legal way.
"Don't pirate our stuff" "Ok, then sell it to me" "No" I get that Nintendo has multiple teams that operate semi-independently, so the marketing and development teams may not interface with the legal team, but at the same time, when one of those teams does something fans don't like, it makes the whole company look bad. I don't care if people pirate games, especially games a company no longer profits off of. There are plenty of games I would pay for, but I'm not going to buy them secondhand because they are too expensive and it doesn't help the company at all.
@@MasterChief0522 what if you can get a game from a company that is older just fine? Like say with sony distributing older games. Would you still be fine with piracy?
All this, plus they took down a fan-made Mario Battle Royale that supported 100 players about a year ago only to later release a version that supports less players and is only available for a limited time. I've been a Nintendo fan my whole life but their recent decisions have me seriously questioning where my loyalties lie.
Nintendo is so incompetent nowadays, it's ridiculous. You need to try hard to fail in Marketing 101 like they did at 'Pokemon Direct'... and that's JUST ONE THING. JUST ONE!
Trey Atkins nobody denies that but that it’s legal=it’s the right choice is a logical fallacy. Not even from a moral standpoint, I think being supportive of fan content is beneficial, it’s the one thing that SEGA gets right.
To be fair gaming is the sector that moves more money so it would not be that strange that the richest gaming company in a country is also the richest company in that country
Yeah it's a bit deceptive to call them the "richest" as it only refers to cash. In assets they're still small potatoes compared to the big car companies or Sony.
Sony: "Console runs out like as usual." Gets blamed for low stock and what stores did along with scalpers Nintendo: "Constantly has low stock on purpose since Mario 2 on the NES, makes stuff in China in order to save money, doesn't care about fans in general, sues fans constantly and has cheap controllers that drift." Is Ignored and people still cater to Nintendo
@@flamingcat1101 To be fair controller drift is a serious issue that Nintendo didn't even try to resolve until someone almost filed a lawsuit against them.
@@user-jl7cz2pe6d oh wow it that bad. Lol overwatch must suck with that controller drift. As in on ps4 controller drift is bad on overwatch and only overwatch for some reason
GeorgiaTechPhenom but you don’t really know how many people are emulating these either so I wouldn’t be too quick to say that but Nintendo really do have some cash cow whales out there >.>
to make everyone know how bad nintendo is, i wanted to play mother 2 on my nintendo 2ds, but it’s available only on the NEW nintendo 3ds consoles. absolute bullshit. so now if i want to play mother 2 i have at least to buy another console and the game itself. fuck nintendo.
Hey do you guys remember that one series, uh, "Kingdom Hearts," where they bundled SIX games, TWO theatrical cutscenes for the DS games, a movie, a load of touch ups and quality of life additions to each game, and a wealth of other bonus content? And released it for 40 bucks?
@@wakemeup5709 anyone remember that kirby series where they bundled 6 games? two episodes from the anime a whol museum a art booklet some extra content like the challenges based on return to dream land and the orchestrated music to. just saying that was nintendo who did it (well and hal)
Borderlands handsome collection and the uncharted collection on ps4 are such huge amounts of content and im pretty sure i got them both for like 60 quid
"People feel like they're gonna need to buy it" Why do you think limited edition is always so expensive It makes you think you're supposed to buy it since it's limited so they take advantage of that and make it more expensive
@@2cheesy4u82 yes, but when Microsoft (for example) pulls this kinda shit people are much more willing to call them out on it. Nintendo often gets a free pass for it when they really shouldn't.
Despite Nintendo being one of the older companies, most of it's fanbase are still children. The kid fans speak louder than the adult fans unfortunately.
@@ahumanbeingfromtheearth1502 Other Platforms: Why does our game run like shit? Why isn't there higher frames/better graphics? Why is there so many microtransactions for this remake? Nintendo Fans: Hehe Nostalgia go brrrrrrr
This is honestly a scary video. People are so attached to the brand that they will easily forgive things like this. I saw it when Pokemon Sword and Shield released: People will just gloss over obvious, objective flaws because it says Pokemon on it, reinforcing the fact that developers, publishers etc. never have to put effort again in their products, be it quality wise or in other consumer friendly ways. Nintendo limiting the release of this collection is just another stamp on the ticket. People love Nintendo, they will buy it and not even see it as the issue that it clearly is, and Nintendo knows it.
I know I bought Mario 3D all stars instantly after school and now it’s not worth it I would rather play the Mario 64 port to pc because you can download a remake pack
I mean, at least Sword and Shield had some charming designs, but even still i could smell the burnout constantly wheezing from the game whenever i played it.
This is why emulation will never go away. They can shut down the emuparadises all they want, but there will always be torrents, there will always be small-time sites popping up in the far corners of the internet that you can grab ROMs off of. You'll always have users sharing ROMs over various file transfer sites, Discord, etc. No matter what, they cannot kill the ROM sharing community. Well, okay. There is one way. They could just make all the games reasonably obtainable without stupid loopholes, deadlines, limited availability, monthly fees, etc. Just one-time reasonable price per rom. All NES games should be $5, SNES games $8, N64, $12 and GC games $15. I'd probably eventually buy the whole library of games that I own in cartridge format or have played at one time or another. But no. They aren't smart enough to do that. So I'll continue emulating.
They basically did that with the SNES mini that came loaded with 20 or so games. I found one and bought it because it was around the time all the good stuff got removed from the ROM websites. Even with that, it was a very limited release. They'll probably do it again at some point
@@Propane_Acccessories I doubt they will, but even if the did.. the SNES mini has what, 20-30 games? Too bad there are over 700 and most of my favorites weren't even on the thing to begin with. Though you .... could..... jailbreak it and put your own SNES games on it, and there was more than enough room on the thing's storage device, but again, this required ROM files. Not much difference between doing that, and loading up BSNES on your PC. At least with the latter, you get more than 1 save state and you get other things like cheat engine (aka game genie) support.
@@Dhalin I feel that. I just got it because of the hundreds of snes games out there, it actually had almost all of my favorites. Just got lucky I suppose
@@Propane_Acccessories I'm a JRPG fan, and the SNES Mini only has 4 and leaves out.... a ton others. The system doesn't even have 10% of the games I own in cartridge format. I mean, they could have at least stuck a SNES cart reader on it or something, for those of us who have cartridges laying around with no decent way of playing the games on them. That's why you see retro gaming consoles popping up that can copy your cartridges to ROMs and play them.
The short answer: The company itself sucks, the games are cool. Edit: hey everyone, I just want to point out that someone in the replies said they made the 2d all stars was limited too, and this recent cause is making me call nintendo a bad company, I just want to say three things: 1. Yes this is 3 weeks late, I'm sorry. 2. While yes, I do understand the limited physical copies, but for nintendo to make the digital copy limited, too, is very stupid 3. I'm not calling nintendo anti-consumer for just this cause. They have done some really bad anti-consumer moves. Like the online mode, for instance. Now I know this issue has been grinded to the center of the earth, but I will say this, if I have to buy an extension to improve my online, and it's still shitty, and nintendo is showing no signs of even trying to improve the online system, while knowing people are still gonna buy the subscription anyway, is very greedy and inconsiderate.
@@coolbeans7z539 they also re-release old games over prized with no improvements (Pokémon mystery dungeon dx, a literal gba game for 60 bucks). They have a console like the switch for over 3 years and I can count the new triple A games with my 2 hands. If they keep this pace up the switch will have like 20 big games at the end of its lifespan and 50 more overpriced ports of old games. I would be pretty disappointed especially compared to other consoles that have way more big games to play. Nintendo always had less big titles but it's really getting ridiculous. They are wasting too much work on cheap overpriced ports instead of focusing on new big games that would make the switch worth having.
@@MrDuck797 Agreed. I bought 3D All-Stars because I have nostalgic attachment to all three games, but even I admit that Nintendo's handling of the situation has caused their reputation to take a hit in my eyes.
March 31 is exactly 3 weeks after March 10. There are *3* games in the *3D* All Stars collection. March is the *3rd* month of the year, and this is the *31* day of that month. Half-life 3 confi-
I went on a rant on Discord a little while back about Nintendo's re-releases - It's getting to be that time of the century where copyrights and such are starting to expire, and thus Nintendo will start to lose control on some of their older games in due time. I think they're actively re-releasing stuff to future-proof their catalog from copyright loss, and in the process keep a pretty strong grip on emulation policies - I used to use "Vizzed" as a ROM and emulation site for a while until they got Nintendo'd pretty hard. Now, I do imagine someone's gonna come at me with "Well what about all the other recent releases, hmm?" to which I answer that they just don't come off anywhere near as striving for control. The Crash and Spyro remakes, (my personal favorite) the Mega Man Zero/ZX Legacy Collection (I forget what its price was on the Switch but on Steam it's $30 - that's for *6* games and a fair amount of bonus content on top of that), they feel like they were made with the fans in mind, like they add some really meaningful stuff to the original games. Nintendo's rereleases, not so much. (Btw just a mild tangent, Capcom's amazing about their PR about emulation and such, I have only ever seen them go down hard on *one* fan project - "Shanghai.exe", a mixture of their Battle Network series and ZUN's Touhou Project - and that was because the original developer had set up a Patreon for the project; they were mad about the monetization more than anything else. Some other people picked up the project from where he left, except without monetizing the project, and right now it's in almost a fully-complete state!)
how are nintendo's rereleases any different then other compilations? like if you mean there actual compilations aside from mario 3d all stars there was kirbyd ream colelction which had 6 games and extra content to. and were meaningful. if you mean rereleases of modern ports like wii u games? that's different. plus doesn't copyright last like almost a century?
@@Jdudec367 To answer: - The main issue right now is 3D All-Stars, their other rerelease compilations are alright, but Nintendo's been, off as of late. The very limited time window to go and buy the game is one of the things that's throwing me (and the dollars-per-game ratio is rather high, like the Rare Replay collection is 1:1 for $30; there was also an Uncharted collection for remasters of that series, and while that one _did_ start at 20:1 for $60 too, they eventually dropped it down to $20 overall). Plus, as I've stated, Nintendo's rather hard on people when it comes to copyrights. - I will give you some credit here, as copyrights typically hold up for as long as the author lives, then 70 years after they pass away, so it _can_ last over a century, so you're not wrong there.
@@DQBlizzard_ Yeah, but if you are going to shut down unofficial avenues, at least create a viable, legal one (without time limit). Nintendo only did half of that. They did it, but with a massive asterisk.
Nintendo for a while has been the gaming company that puts out pretty consistently nice content but does a lot of weird stuff. I agree with your points and I continue to be frustrated by joy con drift, which should've got fixed years ago. By this point, though, I see the gaming market as such a predatory place due to all the other publishers that even with what Nintendo is doing they still feel like the good guys. I'm praying they don't go the same route one of my other favorite gaming companies, Blizzard, did. I'd rather not watch my favorite IPs leap onto sawblades, flail about in sulphuric acid, get rolled over by a Chinese tank, then get blasted to bits by artillery yet again, thank you very much.
Nintendo are not good guys. If you have to compare them to companies that are even worse in order to make them stand out as "better", then they are clearly not good at all.
Nintendo isn't the good guy in any way now: -Crappy online blocked by a paywall -60$ WiiU ports. -Barely any new games since 2018 -Overpriced DLCs -DLC and season pass for ports of old games. -Worse graphics in the gamming market (Pokémon) - Barely no legacy content, they don't want you to play their old games if it isn't a 20$ port for a Nintendo 64 game.
paco ramon I don’t want to look like a Nintendo fanboy, but I need to comment on some of this things. -Barely any new games since 2018? What the hell are you talking about? 2018 was a bit of a dry year. But there have been more than enough games that have come since that year. -Nintendo doesn’t have the best graphics, but they have great style! BOTW, Mario Odyssey, and Smash are all gorgeous games! Pokémon looks terrible, yes. But that’s one game, and Nintendo didn’t even make Pokémon Sword and Shield. Game Freak makes Pokémon games. -Overpriced DLCs? Like what? The most expensive DLC I can think of is $20. And you actually get good content that FEELS like extra content. Like the Octo Expansion and BOTW. They’re one hundred times better with DLC than almost every other game company in existence. -What DLC or season passes are you referring to for ports of old games? And how are they bad? DLC isn’t inherently bad. It’s only bad when the main game is lacking and the expensive DLC is supposed to make up for that. Again, I don’t want to seem like a fanboy. I agree with your other points. The shitty online is outrageous and unacceptable, the ports are annoying and overpriced, and they’re so frustrating with how they treat their legacy content. They’re also annoying with how much they don’t listen to their fans, and how out of touch they are.
@@AlfredoPuente8 -every console has an online service -...so? I don't get how it's bad to want to make money off of games that very few people bought thanks to the wii u failure -what the hell are you talking about, that's literally a lie -what dlcs are overpriced? How do you decide if they're overpriced? -again, what dlcs...? -that's because the switch is quite obviously a portable console that can connect to a tv. Of course it's not gonna look as good as a ps4. Also pokemon is made by gamefreak, and the game was clearly rushed. That has nothing to do with Nintendo itself, but with game freak and the deadlines tpc sets. -which most companies also don't have so i mean :/
Should not be limited time, it's literally free money. They put no effort into the collection so shouldn't have put effort into making it a limited release. If any other company did this they'd be flattened, but it's perfect Nintendo who everyone and their dog loves.
Nah, your thinking is backwards on this. The collection is very low effort as can easily be seen and I am certain it would have done much worse if it wasn't for a limited time (especially since there already is a much better fanmade SM64 port on the switch and people pirate SMS and SMG on dolphin). Therefore, they wanted a guaranteed way to make it sell which is the mind game that you will miss it out unless you buy it now.
90? I've seen them for 130 on ebay I'm legit really happy that stores near me are making a 1 per person rule, mainly cause it really doesn't benifit them in any huge way but only benifits the consumer
I don't get the problem. Go to their house and shoot them. Easy. Individuals like that have abused their gift of life. The only way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
My two guesses for their reasoning: 1. The idea of exclusive gimmick merchandise is a lot more popular in Japan than it is here. Hence weird stuff like Sega's mini Game Gear that looks like playing games on it is practically impossible. Fandom culture there is so, uh, "evolved" that people often lap this stuff up. 2. Nintendo *probably* have a new 3D Mario game in the works (I would guess Odyssey 2, though it's also possible they might be following up the 3D World series) and might be worried about these anniversary titles self-competing. Both are *BAD* excuses for the limited-time selling, don't get me wrong, but that's probably the why.
another thing to add is alot of info is curculating bout 64 games comming to switch online which has some lvl of creedence due to data mining and whatnot so i have a feeling this bundle is limited time purely for that reason??? also another rumour ive heard is this game collection is being used to test how wii games and 64 games can be ported as 64 used the MIPS architecture which was ditched for the reason of it was just utter garbage especially in comparison the titans of powerPC, x86 and arm (arm being the incumbent architecture) thus porting ive heard can be a real nightmare and as the community has proven emulation is not fun for the 64 as the customised use of MIPS makes the 64 inherently hard to work with if u dont have official hardware and to an extent software even nintendo i think has struggled as the 64 was a very powerful console for its time thus emulation is not great and direct ports are messy and time consuming, with the wii tho powerPC might be dead but it plays nicer with arm for a start so the issue lies in the control setup for the wii and how that would map to a vastly different console ie the price might be high but i think more has happened behind the scenes than we can see to get this to work so my honest opinion is the port of galaxy is a test for how well wii games will port to the switch and i guess future consoles, cos honestly i remember the atempt made with the ds on the wii u and i think they dont want to do that one again cos it wasnt the greatest in practice so i think really we who purchase are actually the ginniepigs for when they inevitably release these games as part of online later on XD
@@facebooktweeter4948 I wasn't talking about the 60$ price tag, I was talking about the limited time purchase. The 60$ price tag is _objectively_ steep (if you use Nintendo's most recent pricings for these games as reference, and even if you don't assume any price decay has happened since and don't make any discount for a bundle purchase ~40$ is the "fair" price) but I don't take major issue with it. The three games in the bundle are massive releases with a lot of content, and Mario 64 in particular is one of the most important games ever made, so charging a premium pricetag isn't out of the question IMO, much like how Nintendo take a while to decay their prices on new releases- It's a right they get to invoke because their release standards are usually so high.
DarthVaderReviews Nintendo games barley go on sale and all their titles that they release is always 60 dollars and they used to charge a lot for sm64.sunshine and galaxy so that’s why I think it could have been priced higher but the fact that it’s still 60 dollars for a lot of content is just surreal.
DarthVaderReviews but I mean even if u weren’t talking about the price tag,I think the price tag has something to do with the limited purchase as I said these games are important and loved by a lot of people and since it’s all gonna be in one package,they obviously couldn’t have made it permant digital.Like it was too good to be true since it’s Nintendo at the end of the day
I read somewhere that Nintendo listens to the fans and knows what they want. They are just very selective when it comes to giving fans what they want, and it appears that stuff like Switch themes and VC are too much effort for them to implement. Theyll only give the fans something that requires little effort
@@user-tb9sq5po6z That make no sense since they had already engineered an infrastructure for virtual console for the Wii. They built a new infrastructure with this one
@@imojado7294 Its not that simple. On the switch, they would have to recode many games to show the controls of the joycons/pro controller. I think they've just given up on porting old games simply because of the controls. That's why you can see when they ported Mario sunshine, they even edited fludd's voice when he talks through the controls with mario. Controls arent much of an issue in SNES or NES games because it's rather basic. But the controls get more complicated 64 and onwards and I dont think Nintendo wants to put the effort in
Take a closer look at the date, March/31/2021. And what comes after March 31, April fools. Its probably a joke. They are probably doing that to convince people to buy it.
@@businesscat25 that sounds like what someone desperately grasping for straws would say. Admit that the Nintendo of today is not the Nintendo you once knew & loved.
@@BinglesP But they're not even doing it for money. Like... they don't let you buy the older games, you gotta get them from a reseller on ebay or some shit, which makes Nintendo 0 money.
To make shit worse, someone did an interview with Doug Bowser and he completely dodged every question (even important ones like fixing online and info about Prime 4) and just said copy and pasted crap that every company in existence says about themselves
Doug Bowser worked for EA, so of course he’s going to implement the vast majority of their anti-consumer business practices on top of the ones Nintendo already has.
I "have" to because I only have a switch and 3ds and never got to play sunshine or galaxy so this is the best way to do it. But damn, it freaking pisses me off because I don't have a choice because these will go to absurb prices that you HAVE to pay on ebay come April or May
You still cant play the thousand year door without a disc without it technically being looked down on, or wind waker without a wii u or original hardware (including wii)
Okay, just between you and me and not trying to start a fight, what does “Just lazy” mean to you? Like what does a game need to have or not have to be considered not lazy?
@@TGtornadoe Tree texture that looks better than those of Ocarina of Time N64 ? Sure they were beautiful for they release but in 2019 it's KINDA cringe Would be a good base.
I mean, tbh... Sword & Shield was absolute shit. Atleast you know how the games on 3D All-Stars are, unlike Sword & Shield. Plus, it‘s 60€ for 3 games while Sword & Shield are like 50€ seperately, plus some DLC... idk
eh...this has issues but I wouldn't say it's as bad or controversial as sword and shield...it isn't a bad collection could be seen as kinda overpriced and lackluster could be better really
Its because nintendo knows they can get away with it. And get away with it they will. They're nintendo, come on. People will buy it. It will be a success.
That's sadly the way it works with this, they treat consumers and loyal fans like a pet on a leash as if they revolve completely around them, if we ever see remasters of fan favorites it will be unnecessarily glorified by nintendo as if it's something of a privilege to enjoy their products, they have a loyal fan base and they take advantage of that knowledge, it's unfair and they know that they won't be stood up too, look at indie developers giving us things like the Henry stickmin collection, knowing how they need their fan base just as much as they need them, rather than nintendo treating it's fans like a parasite feeding of of it rather then offering support and having that support feel one-sided.
*"People will buy it."* I won't. Boneheaded and narrow-minded decisions like this are what ruined the Wii U. The Wii U had potential, but they wasted it. Star Fox Zero could've been a success, but because of Nintendo's selfish tunnel vision when it comes to controls, it bombed horribly.
the nintendo switch actually could’ve been a cool console with potential, but guess it’s just an excuse for nintendo to reuse the same old games for $60
The reason I’m interested is because I have never played 64, I did play Sunshine and Galaxy at one point but it’s been several years since then and I need to replay them
Yeah, this is why I’ve started to lose hope in Nintendo. If they don’t change their act soon, Nintendo might end up in a situation where they have no choice but to admit to themselves that they royally screwed up, and not just a simple mama-mia.
Honestly, I think Nintendo has been getting kinda worse since 2017. I mean, the Switch is cool, and the games released on it are great, but the accessibility of their older games seems to be decreasing steadily, especially since older games cost so much for their original consoles now.
Emuparadise actually still works. all you need is an extention called 'tampermonkey' and some code. this link contains everything you need: www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/968sm6/a_script_for_easy_downloading_of_emuparadise_roms/
I love Nintendo and never see myself leaving them, but things like this and removing Pikmin 3 and Tropical Freeze from Wii U eshop, joycons having drift after just after a year of use in most cases, which is just past warranty, and the fact that lets be honest, their online service is sub par, but is still a subscription for peer to peer, not even server based multi-player. These things may make them lose me as a loyal customer someday if they don't get their act together. I have been loyal with this company my entire life, one of the 3 and a half people that owned a wii u, thought it was a great console, but things are changing.
The subscription thing people were just allowed to copy microsoft’s scammy trend that they started, nintendo just decided to follow in those ill advised but unpunishable footsteps. Idk how much better of a service sony provided but still. PC and mobile players: “you guys are paying (to play online)?”
@@henrysmarthy286 That doesnt change the fact they removed it, plus Tropical Freeze is still not on the eshop. If there wasnt as much of an outrage over it, they wouldnt have brought it back. It is still an anti consumer move, them bringing it back, does not make it just.
They brought back pikmin to the eshop, but same. Nintendo used to be my heroes, but now I feel like they're in a downward spiral. They're just so scummy nowadays. Maybe i'm just a boomer, but they just don't make their games like they used to.
its dumb how they display it like a treat for old fans and a gateway to older games for new fans. Yet they limit its time, the older fans will obviously be eager to buy it straight away but any new fan wouldn't really care as much, leading to less newer fans being able to play
I’ve always been a Nintendo fan, I’d even say I was a defending fanboy back in the Gamecube-WiiU era but the switch era really opened my eyes on how anti consumer Nintendo can really be and made me so much more critical towards the company
@@Clevoliver Sure, they'd release a quality title once and again, but y'know.. Third parties have kinda been better than nintendo since the new CEO and the start of the switch.
Nintendo will continue these practices so long as people are giving them money. It's impossible for a boycott or revolt to happen because Nintendo have the power of nostalgia and the casual gaming audience on their side who really don't care about what diehard fans are missing, they just consume whatever Nintendo put out. Since Iwata passed Nintendo have followed suit with other greedy business practices from other companies and will continue down this path because it works. Like it or not, Nintendo has changed and will never be the same again, and they will keep pushing the envelope as long as money keeps filling their pockets.
And thats why i have a hacked switch, don't get me wrong im a game dev myself and i hate piracy, but as you said it its the only to make a big company listen, i have every nintendo system execpt the original gameboy models and virtual boy, so i really love nintendo but these buisness practices are just wrong
*boardroom meeting* employee#1: “hey how bout we make the physical version a limited supply only!” employee#2: “OHH OHHH! aaaaaaand make the eshop version available until the 1st quarter of next year!” boss: “It’s brillant! brillant! brillant!! quick to the secret lab!!”
Can we also talk about how there was a fanmade mario battle royale that had relatively similar ideas that nintendo shut down And then they pull mario 35
They've done it with AM2R (Metroid: Samus Returns) and Pixelmon (Pokemon Quest). At this point, making a Nintendo fangame is more like trying to find out what Nintendo is planning in the future.
@@pennysantana247 pixelmon is always one i feel is reaching, since the pixelmon mod had highly realistic pokemon as opposed to quest, which has minecrafty looking pokemon, but you cannot deny AM2R.
It feels like the limited availability of these games has something to do with the end of the Japanese fiscal year being March 31st. They probably want to improve Switch and game sales in the short term for some kind of reason, like impressing shareholders or w/e business people do
Nintendo has literally always been like this. They’ve been shutting down rom hacks of 10 year old games for over a decade now and I absolutely despise them for it. I’ve never seen a company as patent greedy as Nintendo
Nintendo used to be the frustrating company of “two steps forward, one step back,” but now it looks like they’re only taking one step forward and two steps back, while simultaneously becoming the modern Disney of the video game world, making extremely anti-consumer moves because they know they’re too big to fail. To be honest, I’m done with this. I’m just gonna save up for a PS5 or a good PC. I already own galaxy and galaxy 2 for Wii, and I wholeheartedly plan on emulating sunshine and 64 if I want to play them. I’ve already got dolphin running to play all of the other classics they don’t want me to play, sunshine is no different. As for 64, I’m sure it’s fairly easy to set up, plus I can access amazing hacks the community has made. It’s a much better deal than this whole collection. Nintendo’s job here was to do something more than that to justify a consumer choosing them over emulation and hacking, and they failed even more than I thought they would. I set my expectations at the ground floor of a 600 story building, and they decided to dig out 10 or 20 basements. If I have to play the game Nintendo wants me to just so I can play the video games they’re making, then I’m out. It was a good run, but this is the end for me unless they can make some good stuff (and actually allow people to buy and play it) and clean up their act. Good riddance.
Hey man I'd suggest you get the Mario 64 PC Port instead if emulating it, it's basically the same as the Switch port mentioned in the video but less limited. It's a really complicated process to actually get the game to work but the result is way better than emulation and there are plenty of tutorials out there, I'd imagine.
Pedro Lucas I just watched one video tutorial and was able to set it up fine. Just as much headache as anything else on PC gives me. The 60fps and widescreen really make the game feel great. Plus there's tons of other mods to improve the experience, like removing the draw distance for levels.
I agree. I’m upset because they took Mario Battle Royale, and I’m not even all that excited for botw2 or the new remake. I never even really liked those..
I'm gonna insert a meme here: Can we have Super Mario 3D All Stars? Mum/Mom: We have Super Mario 3D All Stars at home. At home: A Wii with the virtual console super mario 64, sunshine since gamecube games can run on wii, as well as both galaxies.
Yeah but like, nintendo posts stuff on social media and youtube community somewhat often. Theyre not oblivious to all the people complaining. In fact sometimes it seems like they enjoy some of the anger directed at them.
@@user-tb9sq5po6z Nintendo is too lazy, so I agree about that. Seriously, why can't they just remake the entire Virtual Console store by matching the UI with the Switch's theme, and rename the Wii Points to Switch Points? And I also think that you should be able to get achievements inside games to get the Switch Points, then spend Switch Points on Virtual Console games? And why not more themes you can buy with Switch Points? Seriously Nintendo, STOP BEING LAZY and GIVE US VIRTUAL CONSOLE BACK
@@nexutrosity Nintendo wouldn't make much money off of VC then. Your suggestion is nice, but it isn't profitable. Nintendo want to make money while putting in as little effort as possible, save for their occasional innovative releases every 5 years or so to save face.
I feel really upset towards Nintendo as a company, everyday they are becoming more cold-hearted towards their fans and what they do for them, they're becoming as souless as Disney!
@@opossumontheinternet9864 if the game actually never sees the light of day again it would just be more confusing unless Nintendo is purposefully doing this and secretly the scalpers so they can sell the games for hundreds of dollars onlinem
@@Spicy3ango we know, but it's just a stupid decision for Nintendo to make it limited when if you have a n64, GameCube or wii you can just get it for like 20 bucks.
they call it all star.... like the allstar that had mario bros, mario bros the lost levels(jp 2), mario bros 3, and mario bros 2... which had a limited time, non-resale version (in NA) that had mario world (with updated luigi sprite). That's 4 games, 5 with the + world version. Which was what they had at that time for main mario games. Yet they didnt even bother to add New Super Mario bros wii/wiiu, nor any of that sort that were on the handhelds, nor the ds version of M64. It's not about whether or not there was a galaxy 2 in it, its about the fact that they didn't even bother to add the other games in, sure they aren't the same kind of 3d, but they shouldve at least compensated with that to make it have that 60 dollar earning.
The scary part is that there are actually people that saw the announcement and made comments along the lines of "bruh this limited release is just gonna encourage piracy" or "bruh where's galaxy 2", and when they did there were some motherfuckers down there DEFENDING this practice. "Emulation is sTeAlInG, the oFfIcIaL way is better!!!!!! gO tO jAiL!!!!!!!!" "It's to drive up dEmAnD and make mOrE pEoPlE buy the game, SHUT UP!!!!!!" "Can't buy it immediately? jUsT wOrK aNd gEt mOnEy!!!!" "gAlAxY 2 wAs uNnEcEsSaRy!!!!!!!" Some even making fun of people that wanted galaxy 2, insinuating they're "too greedy" or "ask for too much". Like, fucking seriously? It's people like them that NORMALIZE these shitty practices and are ENCOURAGING Nintendo to be lazy with these ports.
The limited time offer is something Blizzard does aswell with their WoW ingame shop. It forces people to buy the product now so they don't miss out on it. However limited time offer does not mean they can't take it up later again which is what they are going to do. It's a trick to get more people buying it now and not missing out on people buying it later at the same time. However people buying it sooner is better than later since they can use the money right now and due to inflation lowering the value of the money later. It's a scummy thing and I'm tired of people seeing different developers as "the good guys" : (Nintendo) and others as the "the bad guys": (EA , Activision etc.)
Aradia Megido eh idk 3ds is nearly 10 years old wii is 13 going on 14 there is only 4 to 5 years in between. Really I believe it may be because it’s a handheld. Even if the switch is a hybrid these are all home console games which could be why it was left out.
Nintendo can be very creative/innovative sometimes but the fact that they can't let their fanbase be like that completely nullifies this. Also, one of the only reasons Sega are still active is that they don't restrict the use of sonic by fans, and it shows.
@@lukealias1uk345 Mario Fans: So, we made a PC port of Mario 64 by reverse-engineering the game's source code, and it includes widescreen, 60 FPS, and 4K support---- Nintendo: A POX UPON THEE! (DMCAs them) Christian Whitehead: So, I ported Sonic CD to the iPhone using a brand new engine that's accurate to the original game and made a bunch of quality-of-life improvements to the game.... SEGA: Dude, would you like to work with us?
Sega are still opposites to Nintendo even now. They aren't good game developers (even though they try) and they make more moral decisions for their company and genuinely care about their fans. Nintendo are good game designers but are corporate monsters that make decisions based on profit. That is why I now prefer indie games. They are everything Sega is and they are everywhere, making games they care about. Sega has made some good sonic games mind you, they just don't have the best track record
@@rjd1922 It literally can't be. They threatened legal action against the guy who originally made it and it was a whole thing going around the internet for like 2 weeks.
Maybe I shouldn’t have watched a video that makes people see this game for what it truly is. I was caught up by nostalgia I didn’t even realize how terrible this is.
This is why nostalgia is a problem. It allows companies like Nintendo to do the bare minimum because they know weebs on Twitter are fantasizing about stuff like 3D all stars all the time and will buy their products regardless of quality.
Gore Magician not to mention that crash and Spyro trilogies were complete remakes and were sold also at 60 or even cheaper in certain places, and yet Nintendo sells this bare minimum at $60 because they know people are drones that don’t know you can play these games with dolphin
![Elu Tran [Archived]](http://yt3.ggpht.com/ZLma-3AG7inoioeoEQHsavrA4J8Py6BFJv7MJovBKSS4Dlt3cpkdShaVGEWEn_JFUx0JXIUg_Q=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
If you liked this style of video, please check out Gonz's youtube! He did most of the work, scriptwriting, and the voice over as well! He has a ton of really good quality videos!
ruclips.net/channel/UCdWQvRH_9RekrZGVmRpT1Iw
You should get in touch with Arlo I mean he would love to talk about this and he has a bigger platform I also think the message could reach Nintendo's ear's if you get someone bigger to talk about this stuff. And yes I did read this comment but you posting this means you most likely agree with the video itself.
Great video
Love these vids
I hope next aneversery they make a paper mario bundle
@Elu Tran My Guy What's Wrong With Super Mario Sunshine Being Widescreen?
“Sorry fans, you can’t have Mario Galaxy 2. Come back when you’re a little, mmmmmmm, richer!”
did they say that Galaxy 2 would be dlc or something?
Ok
Lee Butler Where did you hear that?
@@nicegoatdoctor8224 what else is this comment insinuating? I was wondering where OP heard it from myself
Of course nintendo is on your side, but they still have to sell the stuff. Just...pick what you want, THEY'LL handle the rupees!!
"Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem"
-Gabe Newell
for as many times I keep seeing this quote tossed around in these situations it never stops being so right i grew up with Nintendo but I swear would it kill then to just be halfway decent to people
It's both if you live in a third world country lmao
@@theraymunator so fucking true. a $60 game here is the same price of ordering food from a restaurant for 10 days straight
Maz now I have multiple questions but I guess most of all where the hell do you live that sounds funky guess the more you know
@@cronasan6931 egypt
“pirates are unsatisfied customers” -Gabe Newell
not really, I'm just a customer who misses demos
-Gabe Newell
That doesn't always apply though.
In most cases yes, but a lot of pirates are people living in less fortunate areas (which is completely understandable), and people who are just greedy and don't care (which is just scummy)
@@codo8584 also protest, dont forget protest (always pirate ea)
"Mothers will be able to take their Kids to the Local Stores to Buy the Game"
Bold of you to assume my mom would even listen to me
Hey i mean, he said that they could, not that they would
I'll never understand how people are totally fine with game-services shutting down when it costs Nintendo literal pennies to keep them running indefinitely.
those servers could go to other uses, maintenance costs... It racks up to a lot, especially to keep a game which has a very small amount of players.
@@Wheagg You do realize they don't use an entire server for a single game?
@@Caydiem if there's only 300 players. You need multiple for some games.
@@Wheagg
"if there's only 300 players"
Servers are getting less costly and more efficient by the year so I highly doubt that statement.
Since most people switched over to the latest Nintendo systems anyway there's even less reason to not keep the old services running, since the playerbase is accordingly smaller and needs less resources.
@@Caydiem I get servers on pc are free. But a lot of people who own websites will tell you even small servers require lots of cash
To quote Dunkey -
Nintendo. They don't understand marketing, they don't understand how to run a business, but they do understand how to make video games.
On point
That is so spot-on
That's still a step up from a few other companies.
Looking at you, Konami. Glaring, in fact.
EA, Ubisoft, you’re next
They may have the worst customer service on Earth, but boy do they do amazing games.
Nintendo:
Downloading ROMs hurt us, so we will take legal meashures to prevent you from doing so, even if that meand you won't experience our old and less popular games.
Also Nintendo:
We'll add timeframes and make it harder for you to play our games the legal way.
It almost as if Nintendo wants their games to end up as abandonware
Nintendo wants to keep their games in their vaults and limit access to them so that they can keep rereleasing the same games over and over again.
Why should I buy a nintendo virtual console game if the roms are easily accessible? That's why Nintendo takes a hammer to rom sites like Emuparadise. It makes their old games more exclusive when they finally rerelease them- especially if they put a limited time frame on them to buy them.
@@themarshmalloreo3929 how is more exclusive if they normally rerelease them?
month later edit: Ok I guess what you mean is with them taking down emulation sites...which yeah can be annoying. Although if it's piracy? I get taking it down. Especially if there already distributing older games
Also also Nintendo: selling emulated games
Found this on an old page of their website:
People Making Nintendo Emulators and Nintendo ROMs are Helping Publishers by Making Old Games Available that are No Longer Being Sold by the Copyright Owner. This Does Not Hurt Anyone and Allows Gamers to Play Old Favorites. What's the Problem?
The problem is that it's illegal. Copyrights and trademarks of games are corporate assets. If these vintage titles are available far and wide, it undermines the value of this intellectual property and adversely affects the right owner. In addition, the assumption that the games involved are vintage or nostalgia games is incorrect. Nintendo is famous for bringing back to life its popular characters for its newer systems, for example, Mario and Donkey Kong have enjoyed their adventures on all Nintendo platforms, going from coin-op machines to our latest hardware platforms. As a copyright owner, and creator of such famous characters, only Nintendo has the right to benefit from such valuable assets.
@@Anis360-k5p I will say not every game has copyrighted roms though...which would make it easier...so not all online emulation is piracy. like with mother 3 here it seems...plus they surprisingly haven't taken down the fan translation after a decade
Nintendo's care for their fans died with Satoru Iwata, Miyamoto's too old to make a difference in the company.
Wait... you can talk!?
Seriously though, this was a nice little commentary about the Mario anniversary stuff and the whole manufactured scarcity Nintendo is doing for some reason.
everybody gangsta till soundtrack man starts talking
This was actually Gonz speaking in the video, lol. Still, if you liked it, you'd probably enjoy some of his other stuff as well ruclips.net/channel/UCdWQvRH_9RekrZGVmRpT1Iw
Elu Tran Speak sometime.
@@EluTran Oh, well that explains it entirely.
Still surprised me tho.
Josh Shrum - Elu has spoken before though. I’ve heard him in some of his smash bro’s greninja videos
As I like to say to my friends and family: I like Nintendo as a game designer, but not as a company
That's exactly how I feel about Nintendo, I love so many of their games hut but honestly their choices as a company are simply terrible and almost abusive towards their consumers.
Sadly Nintendo is starting to take notes from the company that it does a lot of business with. And that company is Microsoft. Nintendo is learning from one of the most evil companies on earth. They are learning that greed is good, quality doesn't matter just get the money and worry later, and keep vital features like the Virtual Console, web browser, and personalization settings like avatars, chat, and wallpaper keep them out of gamer hands and keep artificially inflating demand by creating a limited run game then taking the money and getting even more down the line in DLC and online. No, you want to make Nintendo better? Get them away from Microsoft, EA and Activision and remember the consumer matters.
Yeah, it’s different people behind different things. Nintendo’s game designers are great, but their higher-ups are trash.
I wish Iwata didn't die
Nintendos been getting much more corporate and out of touch since Iwata died.
He was probably the most moral man in the corporate world as a whole, and clearly he had a love for his consumers/audience even more so than we loved him which was definitely an extremely high bar.
Personally, I think the years to come will decide whether the death of Satoru Iwata will be the death of Nintendo as a whole, and I pray they turn themselves around.
Agreed.
It feels kinda disrespectful, even..
I'm not going to pretend like everything was perfect when Iwata was in charge, but it does feel like some of this stuff wouldn't have happened if he was still around. Iwata also might have been more honest about joycon drift and been more committed to giving people repairs and fixing the issue altogether.
@@BagaJr Things were by no means perfect, as you say. But Nintendo was a much better company morally and and in terms of consumer satisfaction.
Ffs the man even cut his own really salary a shit ton as opposed to lay offs when the Wii U flubbed.
@@phoenixtrite5068 That's true. I also always forget Shuntaro Furukawa's name because he's been practically invisible to fans since he took over. All the announcements are handled by other people. It's concerning because it feels like a lack of passion, unlike Iwata who was always there for Directs and all the silly skits.
Last year, there was a fan game called “Mario Royale” that Nintendo ruthlessly took down after only a week of existing. The game was really fun. But that aside, I have no idea what “Mario 35” could be based off of. Nintendo wouldn’t shut down a fan game and then steal their idea to make their own game, right? RIGHT!?
Nah, they don't do this. Like, they shut down roms sites in order to prevent emulation, and then, it was confirmed that Mario 64 and Sunshine were running as emulated ports on Switch. But it is just a coincidence that they created a Mario Royale after shutting down a fanmade Mario Royale. Nothing strange to me.
@@molhosoja
They took down Pixelmon then made Pokemon Quest a short time after.
It's NOT a coincidence, they're stealing ideas from fans and they take their games away.
@@alemtotodile8128 I was being sarcastic btw. I know nintendo do this shit and act like nothing happened, even if it is something obvious. I didn't played pokémon uranium before it got shut down but the chances that nintendo "used one of those pokemons as reference" is big.
@@alemtotodile8128 Or the game was already under production and they thought it was a good time to take down the similar illicit third-party games.
Maximilian Vollath yep this is more likely. They took down Metroid remake when they were making Samus Returns
Just a reminder, sega genesis collection on ps3 has 50 games and is 30$.
And Crash Bandicoot N Sane Trilogy is 3 good remakes of classics and it's around 30€
@Patrick Sedler I don’t know what you’re talking about saying Galaxy is mediocre, all 3 of them are great. But yeah the $60 price tag isn’t fair considering Crash and Spyro remakes were built from the ground up and cost $40.
I got that for 15 dollars and I love it.
Patrick Sedler Understandable. The galaxy games are some of if not my favorite games, but people have their own tastes.
@@patricksedler9697 don't shit on my favourite mario.
Nintendo fans: “I love Nintendo”
Nintendo fans: Really?
David Perez * 57 minutes ago (edited)
The PC gaming community kinda sucks ass
I hate nintendo. But I love the games they make.
I like Nintendo and their games but I feel as though it’s getting harder and harder to understand them and what they’re doing. It was difficult enough coming to grips that GameFreak and Pokemon company are bad and I don’t want to see Nintendo fall down the same path as them
Yup
Pr0ject Zero
Really?
trolled.
I'll be coming back to verify
This reality will only be available until March 31st 2021.
I'll hold you up on that
They use the same trick used in "0.99" in price tags.
instead here they say the last day of march to make it seem sooner.
Bet you 50 that you will delete this comment on 31st
"April Fools! No one's allowed to play SM64 anymore!" - Nintendo, probably
"Something is missing" **Wii Shop Music theme plays in the background**
Yeah, that hit deeper than I expected.
Why am i the only reply?
@@unknownunknown5121idk
It's only available for a limited time, because they're going to copyright strike themselves, and give themselves a cease a desist order.
What do you mean by that? I'm confused... 🤔
@@pyp2205 its a joke
@@luca-ui1zf Oh Oops, I thought something was off. I was like "How can Nintendo get a Copyright Strike from their own products?". 🤔😂
Nintendo wants to end it all D:
@@pyp2205 its funny because they took down super mario royale
As a business major in college, what they’re doing is FOMO (Fear of Missing Out), and even as the studying business student that I am, even I’m baffled and confused by the limited availability timeframe...
So basically they're just trying to dip their toe in the water instead of actually jumping in and going all the way?
@@tylerwagner1978, what they're doing makes no sense from a profit standpoint. They know these three games have large followings among their players, and will naturally sell well due to nostalgia and a desire for an HD Switch port. I can't imagine basically limiting the amount of copies is all that smart.
nintendo is the king of artificial scarcity
so u must hate battlepasses then
They always drip feed their content. It creates a higher demand and intrinsically increases the value. This is why old nintendo games don't get cheaper. If anything they get more expensive.
Twilight princess and skyward sword for the wii are both still $60 and not even in HD. Both are zelda games, nintendo's most successful and renound (behind mario ofc.) Both are older than the last of us. Playstations most successful series (debatable, but I'm pretty sure tlou2 sold more copies than any ps exclusive ever, so there's that.) Yet the last of us is available completely remasted in HD, for a grand total of $15.
Again.
Twilight princess, 2006, not even HD on the wii, $60.
The last of us, 2013, remastered for ps4 in HD, $15.
Tbh, nintendo may seem really self righteous for the way they present their games... but they've sort of earned it. The zelda and mario series are both over 30 years old, and every main entry of both series' hold up, and still somehow occasionally break the gaming community.
Breath of the wild case and point. And to a lesser degree, Mario odyssey. Nintendo has one thing even the best playstation games don't. The nintendo polish. They excessively check their games for any problems, they pace them seamlessly, and they always start game developmemt with a new core mechanic, which is basically worked on to the point of perfection then implemented as the "gimmick". Then the rest of the game is built out from that.
Usually it works out for them. But even when it doesn't... you'll never get the same idea sold to you twice with them. At the very least, each game introduces a completely original gameplay experience, and almost without fail it's going to be fun af. Even if you only play it once.
That makes every purchase worth it to me. That's the mark of a company you can trust. They're the most innovative out there and you can't dispute that.
That type of game making is so high risk for any company not willing to put the work into the polish such as nintendo, and especially when they don't have the reputation of nintendo to secure most people atleast trying it. So it's always a win win for me.
I bet my ass that it will be available after March, just each game being sold separately.
For $60 per game.
@@bobbob1876 Exactly.
Sounds like our sweet old Nintendo
When I went to a Best Buy (recently) I saw a lot of copys of 3D all stars for sale
I'm also pretty sure Galaxy 2 will be available as a paid dlc
Granted I didn't care that the price was $60 dollars, but the fact that it's only available for 5 months at the minimum is utter lunacy.
I just find it weird that at one point did a complete overhaul of mario 64 for the DS, but did minute differences for the 3D all stars versions and not even have the DS version of it.
@THE NEWMAKER Too much work for Nintendo clearly
THE NEWMAKER but they made the original with HD graphics, which wouldve been horrible on today’s screens. The same logic could apply for the DS version as well.
THE NEWMAKER the DS game actually managed to have more polygons and reworked graphics compared to the original. Sure it was made for a smaller screen, but you can also say that a lot of screens around the time of the N64 were smaller than tv’s compared to most today
Thats why it is 60$ its a collectors product. They know the value will only rise.
"I don't care about the children. I just care about their parents money!"
Mister Krabs, Krabby Land
OK Cheapy the Cheapskate
Purple Lover C damn bro you got the whole squad laughing.
ImOnMyPhone Sometimes I have the tendency to say “r/woooosh” but after realizing how overused it is, I will not do it.
teehee master if you wanna use it use it
As another wiser person once said, Nintendo's motto is "You're having fun wrong."
"the game is fun." -reggie
Nintendo's way of playing retro games is remastering the first game in a series as long as the series is on a decline.
In the words of the Flame Emperor, "Halt, you're having a bit too much fun"
@@aetimes2 what do you mean? when has it happened like that???
psirockin2 You are getting in the way of my game
Bold take: If Nintendo hadn't been making games of the quality they have been for such a long time, they would be just as hated as EA or Activision.
What's bold about that take?
well they'd probably just be out of business
Not quite, at least for me. There's one reason why:
Nintendo doesn't buy other companies and destroy their product for their own gain.
Before you say anything, yes, Nintendo did take down Mario Royale. However, being fair, Mario is their product. I don't like the decision, but it's a decision that I at least find fair. When you make a game using someone else's assets that they poured money and hard work into, it's fair for them to ask you to take it down.
EA has destroyed several companies that had unique, and fun games (for example, Playfish) by buying the company who owns them and then canceling their games and redirecting you to play their games when you try to go back to those games.
@@ShinySpinarak Also lootboxes.
@mr cheese You had me... and then you lost me lol
The whole limited thing of this event is really stupid, like actually why, it's so dumb and it makes no sense
Like people really want this, and sure you can still buy a physical version of the game a while after march, but it will be so much more expensive i don't understand why Nintendo is doing this
69th like
@Dominix J 'immature' lmao ok
@Dominix J yh but mario 3d all stars tho
@Dominix J
The PS5 will also be hard for people to get enough money to buy it while they need the money to support themselves. This is the Coronavirus! In this case, Sony needs to delay the system.
@@CarloNassar it's a luxury you drooling simpleton. It's meant to be optional to life
"Do what you want cause a pirate is free you are a pirate"
Damn straight ill enjoy my Paper Mario TTYD on pc cause I cannot play it on the switch.
Owned it since release if anyone complains
I sure as hell won't complain. If a company is making no effort to make the games you want to play available, it really is their fault if you have to pirate the game. I feel like I may have to do that in the future when I get into streaming.
They get mad if you use ROMs, but they don't even put these games on their online service..
If everyone is playing pirated games it's because Nintendo doesn't let us play them the legal way.
"Don't pirate our stuff"
"Ok, then sell it to me"
"No"
I get that Nintendo has multiple teams that operate semi-independently, so the marketing and development teams may not interface with the legal team, but at the same time, when one of those teams does something fans don't like, it makes the whole company look bad.
I don't care if people pirate games, especially games a company no longer profits off of. There are plenty of games I would pay for, but I'm not going to buy them secondhand because they are too expensive and it doesn't help the company at all.
is that piracy then? If you own it then it's just emulation then
@@MasterChief0522 what if you can get a game from a company that is older just fine? Like say with sony distributing older games. Would you still be fine with piracy?
All this, plus they took down a fan-made Mario Battle Royale that supported 100 players about a year ago only to later release a version that supports less players and is only available for a limited time. I've been a Nintendo fan my whole life but their recent decisions have me seriously questioning where my loyalties lie.
@Dominix J are you just gonna keep spamming this? Because it's kinda annoying.
Nintendo is so incompetent nowadays, it's ridiculous.
You need to try hard to fail in Marketing 101 like they did at 'Pokemon Direct'... and that's JUST ONE THING. JUST ONE!
They're legally allowed to take that down. Mario is their copyright. I understand the frustration, but technically it is allowed.
Trey Atkins nobody denies that but that it’s legal=it’s the right choice is a logical fallacy. Not even from a moral standpoint, I think being supportive of fan content is beneficial, it’s the one thing that SEGA gets right.
Dominix J ok; I’ll go buy 70 dollar games and 500+ dollar consoles with delayed games
“Nintendo officially named Japan’s richest company”
Toyota: are you challenging me?
Toyota made the 85 hilux, a car which makes toyota instantly better
To be fair gaming is the sector that moves more money so it would not be that strange that the richest gaming company in a country is also the richest company in that country
Sony: are you also challenging me? Huh?
Yeah it's a bit deceptive to call them the "richest" as it only refers to cash. In assets they're still small potatoes compared to the big car companies or Sony.
I mean , people rarely drive during the pandemic and cars wouldn’t sell well too
Sony: "Console runs out like as usual."
Gets blamed for low stock and what stores did along with scalpers
Nintendo: "Constantly has low stock on purpose since Mario 2 on the NES, makes stuff in China in order to save money, doesn't care about fans in general, sues fans constantly and has cheap controllers that drift."
Is Ignored and people still cater to Nintendo
Is this coming from a person who has played Nintendo games? U seem kinda sus. Might be imp. Should we eject?
@@flamingcat1101 To be fair controller drift is a serious issue that Nintendo didn't even try to resolve until someone almost filed a lawsuit against them.
@@user-jl7cz2pe6d oh wow it that bad. Lol overwatch must suck with that controller drift. As in on ps4 controller drift is bad on overwatch and only overwatch for some reason
AND the controllers cost $90 as well!
@@flamingcat1101 try editing your deadzones in the settings
hmm.. March 31st... I can smell it... they're gonna pull an April Fools joke...
:0
Holy shit I didn't even realize that
Yeah it's called Galaxy 2.
@@glaciiz no it's called english re-release of rhythm tengoku
"Only available until march 31st!"
"SIIIIKE!!!!"
Stupid decisions like this are the reason why people stick to emulation.
cant blame you
Wow thats the truthest thing I've ever heard
Not too many people based on sales
GeorgiaTechPhenom but you don’t really know how many people are emulating these either so I wouldn’t be too quick to say that but Nintendo really do have some cash cow whales out there >.>
Emulator users can’t go 5 seconds without talking about how they emulate
man imagine seeing all the mother games in one bundle tho
ha, just kidding that's already been established to NEVER happen
Because of the gba’s speakers, the music in both games (mother 1/2) sounds worse
to make everyone know how bad nintendo is, i wanted to play mother 2 on my nintendo 2ds, but it’s available only on the NEW nintendo 3ds consoles. absolute bullshit. so now if i want to play mother 2 i have at least to buy another console and the game itself. fuck nintendo.
I still believe it will, someday, nintendo has been stupid, but they can't be that stupid, they would make bilions on that.
Hey do you guys remember that one series, uh, "Kingdom Hearts," where they bundled SIX games, TWO theatrical cutscenes for the DS games, a movie, a load of touch ups and quality of life additions to each game, and a wealth of other bonus content?
And released it for 40 bucks?
This is my point. Nintendo does things worse than other companies but people still kiss up to them because their Nintendo.
@@wakemeup5709 and it ticks me off, cause Nintendo will just continue the trend. It's The Wire philosophy: "the worse we do, the more we make."
@@wakemeup5709 anyone remember that kirby series where they bundled 6 games? two episodes from the anime a whol museum a art booklet some extra content like the challenges based on return to dream land and the orchestrated music to. just saying that was nintendo who did it (well and hal)
Borderlands handsome collection and the uncharted collection on ps4 are such huge amounts of content and im pretty sure i got them both for like 60 quid
Also, remember when Square re-released that collection with 2 MORE games later on?
"People feel like they're gonna need to buy it"
Why do you think limited edition is always so expensive
It makes you think you're supposed to buy it since it's limited so they take advantage of that and make it more expensive
Also cause it creates a sense of urgency
@Dominix J if you're gonna keep this up, could you just go to another comment section?
@@rodrigomorales563 I dont think Dominix is actually capable of reading or thinking, it's just a bot programmed to spread negativity and ignorance.
Nintendo fans are some of the biggest bootlickers on Earth. I love their games, but as a company they're mind-bogglingly out of touch.
Dude every single company is like that.
@@2cheesy4u82 yes, but when Microsoft (for example) pulls this kinda shit people are much more willing to call them out on it. Nintendo often gets a free pass for it when they really shouldn't.
Despite Nintendo being one of the older companies, most of it's fanbase are still children. The kid fans speak louder than the adult fans unfortunately.
@@ahumanbeingfromtheearth1502 Other Platforms: Why does our game run like shit? Why isn't there higher frames/better graphics? Why is there so many microtransactions for this remake?
Nintendo Fans: Hehe Nostalgia go brrrrrrr
mhm, bet the dislike are both bots and them boot lickers my god.
but iSheep no doubt top them also sony ponies i don't get ether of them holy shit.
This is honestly a scary video. People are so attached to the brand that they will easily forgive things like this. I saw it when Pokemon Sword and Shield released: People will just gloss over obvious, objective flaws because it says Pokemon on it, reinforcing the fact that developers, publishers etc. never have to put effort again in their products, be it quality wise or in other consumer friendly ways. Nintendo limiting the release of this collection is just another stamp on the ticket. People love Nintendo, they will buy it and not even see it as the issue that it clearly is, and Nintendo knows it.
I know I bought Mario 3D all stars instantly after school and now it’s not worth it I would rather play the Mario 64 port to pc because you can download a remake pack
What is the issue though? That it’s a limited release?
ELGG yes because it makes you rush to buy it and if you can’t get it you can’t get it again
Nintendo diehard fans: don't ask questions, just consume products and get excited for new products
I mean, at least Sword and Shield had some charming designs, but even still i could smell the burnout constantly wheezing from the game whenever i played it.
This is why emulation will never go away. They can shut down the emuparadises all they want, but there will always be torrents, there will always be small-time sites popping up in the far corners of the internet that you can grab ROMs off of. You'll always have users sharing ROMs over various file transfer sites, Discord, etc. No matter what, they cannot kill the ROM sharing community. Well, okay. There is one way. They could just make all the games reasonably obtainable without stupid loopholes, deadlines, limited availability, monthly fees, etc. Just one-time reasonable price per rom. All NES games should be $5, SNES games $8, N64, $12 and GC games $15.
I'd probably eventually buy the whole library of games that I own in cartridge format or have played at one time or another.
But no. They aren't smart enough to do that. So I'll continue emulating.
They basically did that with the SNES mini that came loaded with 20 or so games. I found one and bought it because it was around the time all the good stuff got removed from the ROM websites. Even with that, it was a very limited release. They'll probably do it again at some point
@@Propane_Acccessories I doubt they will, but even if the did.. the SNES mini has what, 20-30 games? Too bad there are over 700 and most of my favorites weren't even on the thing to begin with. Though you .... could..... jailbreak it and put your own SNES games on it, and there was more than enough room on the thing's storage device, but again, this required ROM files. Not much difference between doing that, and loading up BSNES on your PC. At least with the latter, you get more than 1 save state and you get other things like cheat engine (aka game genie) support.
@@Dhalin I feel that. I just got it because of the hundreds of snes games out there, it actually had almost all of my favorites. Just got lucky I suppose
@@Propane_Acccessories I'm a JRPG fan, and the SNES Mini only has 4 and leaves out.... a ton others. The system doesn't even have 10% of the games I own in cartridge format. I mean, they could have at least stuck a SNES cart reader on it or something, for those of us who have cartridges laying around with no decent way of playing the games on them. That's why you see retro gaming consoles popping up that can copy your cartridges to ROMs and play them.
@@Dhalin Oh yeah they were definitely marketing it to the more casual nintendo player.
The short answer: The company itself sucks, the games are cool.
Edit: hey everyone, I just want to point out that someone in the replies said they made the 2d all stars was limited too, and this recent cause is making me call nintendo a bad company, I just want to say three things:
1. Yes this is 3 weeks late, I'm sorry.
2. While yes, I do understand the limited physical copies, but for nintendo to make the digital copy limited, too, is very stupid
3. I'm not calling nintendo anti-consumer for just this cause. They have done some really bad anti-consumer moves. Like the online mode, for instance. Now I know this issue has been grinded to the center of the earth, but I will say this, if I have to buy an extension to improve my online, and it's still shitty, and nintendo is showing no signs of even trying to improve the online system, while knowing people are still gonna buy the subscription anyway, is very greedy and inconsiderate.
Sega is kinda the opposite
Great company that listens to their customers(atleast from what I've seen)
And either horrible, or great games
@@meemosteeno5121 Sega didn't even bother to port the remakes of Sonic the Hedgehog 1 and 2.
@@ahrbro9448 yeah, good point
Wow you summed up capitalism
So basically most companies?
EA: Am I doing it right?
Nintendo: Yes, even better than I expected
*laughs in capitalist lord
Imagine comparing EA to nintendo because they made a gamr collection limited edition
@@coolbeans7z539 they also re-release old games over prized with no improvements (Pokémon mystery dungeon dx, a literal gba game for 60 bucks). They have a console like the switch for over 3 years and I can count the new triple A games with my 2 hands. If they keep this pace up the switch will have like 20 big games at the end of its lifespan and 50 more overpriced ports of old games. I would be pretty disappointed especially compared to other consoles that have way more big games to play. Nintendo always had less big titles but it's really getting ridiculous. They are wasting too much work on cheap overpriced ports instead of focusing on new big games that would make the switch worth having.
The heart of Nintendo seems to be covered in that evil slime from Sunshine.
Oh yeah by the way Nintendo said that they will destroy all Wii and N64s and they will all no longer be usable by March 31st 2021.
@@andy.burbulis1899 *looks at my wii*
@@MeltyNote Welp it was nice knowing you, Wii...
@@andy.burbulis1899 oh shit!!! i must buy one and hide it!!!!!!!!!!
NO! My Wii! It's gone!
Nintendo is great at making games, but _terrible_ at running a company.
Feel free to look up Nintendo of America's address and send them a letter about Nintendo of Japan.
After Iwata died and Reggie retired, things just...went downhill
@@MrDuck797 Agreed. I bought 3D All-Stars because I have nostalgic attachment to all three games, but even I admit that Nintendo's handling of the situation has caused their reputation to take a hit in my eyes.
It’s true. I hate that it’s true but it is. But give them a break man, running a company isn’t as easy as you think.
@@Thevamp1reking They're a multi-billion dollar company and can get away with a lot. Please don't defend them.
Why march 31? There’s nothing special about that date for Mario, I would of at least made it march 10, because it’s MAR10 day
6 months from now basically, half a year
If I recall correctly, march 31st is the end of the fiscal year. Or it's at least very close to it.
Pretty sure they'll want to focus on Zelda's anniversary.
@@sanic9073 you are correct. They are trying to boost their sales as much as they can for 2020.
March 31 is exactly 3 weeks after March 10.
There are *3* games in the *3D* All Stars collection.
March is the *3rd* month of the year, and this is the *31* day of that month.
Half-life 3 confi-
at this point i'm convinced the scalpers are just undercover nintendo employees
Imagine making "Mario" a limited time experience I guess they love supporting scalpers now
@@mlau490 So?
@@mlau490 Emulation is no excuse for official releases to be low quality
@@mlau490 have you heard of the 64 PC Port?
@@mlau490 Are you seriously trying to defend scummy business practices by suggesting we partake in illegal activities?
"Now". Clearly you don't remember the Switch launch nearly 4 years ago.
I went on a rant on Discord a little while back about Nintendo's re-releases - It's getting to be that time of the century where copyrights and such are starting to expire, and thus Nintendo will start to lose control on some of their older games in due time. I think they're actively re-releasing stuff to future-proof their catalog from copyright loss, and in the process keep a pretty strong grip on emulation policies - I used to use "Vizzed" as a ROM and emulation site for a while until they got Nintendo'd pretty hard.
Now, I do imagine someone's gonna come at me with "Well what about all the other recent releases, hmm?" to which I answer that they just don't come off anywhere near as striving for control. The Crash and Spyro remakes, (my personal favorite) the Mega Man Zero/ZX Legacy Collection (I forget what its price was on the Switch but on Steam it's $30 - that's for *6* games and a fair amount of bonus content on top of that), they feel like they were made with the fans in mind, like they add some really meaningful stuff to the original games. Nintendo's rereleases, not so much.
(Btw just a mild tangent, Capcom's amazing about their PR about emulation and such, I have only ever seen them go down hard on *one* fan project - "Shanghai.exe", a mixture of their Battle Network series and ZUN's Touhou Project - and that was because the original developer had set up a Patreon for the project; they were mad about the monetization more than anything else. Some other people picked up the project from where he left, except without monetizing the project, and right now it's in almost a fully-complete state!)
how are nintendo's rereleases any different then other compilations? like if you mean there actual compilations aside from mario 3d all stars there was kirbyd ream colelction which had 6 games and extra content to. and were meaningful. if you mean rereleases of modern ports like wii u games? that's different. plus doesn't copyright last like almost a century?
@@Jdudec367 To answer:
- The main issue right now is 3D All-Stars, their other rerelease compilations are alright, but Nintendo's been, off as of late. The very limited time window to go and buy the game is one of the things that's throwing me (and the dollars-per-game ratio is rather high, like the Rare Replay collection is 1:1 for $30; there was also an Uncharted collection for remasters of that series, and while that one _did_ start at 20:1 for $60 too, they eventually dropped it down to $20 overall). Plus, as I've stated, Nintendo's rather hard on people when it comes to copyrights.
- I will give you some credit here, as copyrights typically hold up for as long as the author lives, then 70 years after they pass away, so it _can_ last over a century, so you're not wrong there.
@@lordmarshmal_0643 yeah I get the whole limited window thing would throw you off. I do think the price should have been 40$ at launch really.
Nah, mate, copyright expires 70 years after the death of the author. Nintendo's still good to go for a long ass time.
Matt The Latios Oh hey, I'm a mod on Vizzed. Cool to see it mentioned here, it really sunk a lot after they removed those ROMs.
strikes down mario royale
makes their own mario royale
then makes it limited time
cool
Cool guys
I mean, the first part makes sense, its Nintendo's intellectual property. But limited time is total bullshit
Jorji but they even got rid of the Mario brand and it was still taken down even though you can still find paid ripoffs on the apple AppStore
@@DQBlizzard_
Yeah, but if you are going to shut down unofficial avenues, at least create a viable, legal one (without time limit). Nintendo only did half of that. They did it, but with a massive asterisk.
It's still up (mroyale dot net)
Nintendo for a while has been the gaming company that puts out pretty consistently nice content but does a lot of weird stuff. I agree with your points and I continue to be frustrated by joy con drift, which should've got fixed years ago. By this point, though, I see the gaming market as such a predatory place due to all the other publishers that even with what Nintendo is doing they still feel like the good guys. I'm praying they don't go the same route one of my other favorite gaming companies, Blizzard, did. I'd rather not watch my favorite IPs leap onto sawblades, flail about in sulphuric acid, get rolled over by a Chinese tank, then get blasted to bits by artillery yet again, thank you very much.
Nintendo are not good guys. If you have to compare them to companies that are even worse in order to make them stand out as "better", then they are clearly not good at all.
Nintendo isn't the good guy in any way now:
-Crappy online blocked by a paywall
-60$ WiiU ports.
-Barely any new games since 2018
-Overpriced DLCs
-DLC and season pass for ports of old games.
-Worse graphics in the gamming market (Pokémon)
- Barely no legacy content, they don't want you to play their old games if it isn't a 20$ port for a Nintendo 64 game.
@@waxcutter9813 Because Pokemon rules!
paco ramon I don’t want to look like a Nintendo fanboy, but I need to comment on some of this things.
-Barely any new games since 2018? What the hell are you talking about? 2018 was a bit of a dry year. But there have been more than enough games that have come since that year.
-Nintendo doesn’t have the best graphics, but they have great style! BOTW, Mario Odyssey, and Smash are all gorgeous games! Pokémon looks terrible, yes. But that’s one game, and Nintendo didn’t even make Pokémon Sword and Shield. Game Freak makes Pokémon games.
-Overpriced DLCs? Like what? The most expensive DLC I can think of is $20. And you actually get good content that FEELS like extra content. Like the Octo Expansion and BOTW. They’re one hundred times better with DLC than almost every other game company in existence.
-What DLC or season passes are you referring to for ports of old games? And how are they bad? DLC isn’t inherently bad. It’s only bad when the main game is lacking and the expensive DLC is supposed to make up for that.
Again, I don’t want to seem like a fanboy. I agree with your other points. The shitty online is outrageous and unacceptable, the ports are annoying and overpriced, and they’re so frustrating with how they treat their legacy content. They’re also annoying with how much they don’t listen to their fans, and how out of touch they are.
@@AlfredoPuente8 -every console has an online service
-...so? I don't get how it's bad to want to make money off of games that very few people bought thanks to the wii u failure
-what the hell are you talking about, that's literally a lie
-what dlcs are overpriced? How do you decide if they're overpriced?
-again, what dlcs...?
-that's because the switch is quite obviously a portable console that can connect to a tv. Of course it's not gonna look as good as a ps4. Also pokemon is made by gamefreak, and the game was clearly rushed. That has nothing to do with Nintendo itself, but with game freak and the deadlines tpc sets.
-which most companies also don't have so i mean :/
Dolphin emulator solves all these problems.
Until Nintendo Shuts *THAT* down too
@@yoshimallow Emulators are legally allowed so they can’t really do much. If they were illegal than they’d be shut down by now.
@@yoshimallow Emulators are legal as long as they don't use any proprietary code.
@@yoshimallow only in you're dreams.. it is because you cannot run or build PC? lol
@@smudgybard8983 tell that to melee
I will now quote the infamous line that we all know that stands true to this very day
_"Nintendo is Nintendo"_
but wow, this educated me a lot I didn't even see the direct yet but thanks for summarizing and then breaking it down for me :''D
It was a voice over by someone else
@@guy3630 aw dang itttttttttt!
@@guy3630 but thanks for telling me though fam appreciate it
time_accident np
time_accident also I think Elu posted a comment that has the link to the guys channel
Imma calling it now:
- Galaxy 2 Is gonna be DLC. A LIMITED TIME DLC.
and id still buy it bc im a nintendo cuck
If that happens I will eat my Switch, games and all
And it will only be available for the last 5 minutes until March 31st
if this really hapens... im speechless
For only $39.99!!
Should not be limited time, it's literally free money. They put no effort into the collection so shouldn't have put effort into making it a limited release.
If any other company did this they'd be flattened, but it's perfect Nintendo who everyone and their dog loves.
Nah, your thinking is backwards on this. The collection is very low effort as can easily be seen and I am certain it would have done much worse if it wasn't for a limited time (especially since there already is a much better fanmade SM64 port on the switch and people pirate SMS and SMG on dolphin). Therefore, they wanted a guaranteed way to make it sell which is the mind game that you will miss it out unless you buy it now.
i’m seriously already seeing scalpers price this at around 90 dollars
So the normal prize here in mexico
90? I've seen them for 130 on ebay
I'm legit really happy that stores near me are making a 1 per person rule, mainly cause it really doesn't benifit them in any huge way but only benifits the consumer
I preordered mine off Bestbuy ASAP because I knew scalpers would ruin it lol
I don't get the problem. Go to their house and shoot them. Easy. Individuals like that have abused their gift of life. The only way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
OGRsonic except the standard is different
My two guesses for their reasoning:
1. The idea of exclusive gimmick merchandise is a lot more popular in Japan than it is here. Hence weird stuff like Sega's mini Game Gear that looks like playing games on it is practically impossible. Fandom culture there is so, uh, "evolved" that people often lap this stuff up.
2. Nintendo *probably* have a new 3D Mario game in the works (I would guess Odyssey 2, though it's also possible they might be following up the 3D World series) and might be worried about these anniversary titles self-competing.
Both are *BAD* excuses for the limited-time selling, don't get me wrong, but that's probably the why.
another thing to add is alot of info is curculating bout 64 games comming to switch online which has some lvl of creedence due to data mining and whatnot so i have a feeling this bundle is limited time purely for that reason??? also another rumour ive heard is this game collection is being used to test how wii games and 64 games can be ported as 64 used the MIPS architecture which was ditched for the reason of it was just utter garbage especially in comparison the titans of powerPC, x86 and arm (arm being the incumbent architecture) thus porting ive heard can be a real nightmare and as the community has proven emulation is not fun for the 64 as the customised use of MIPS makes the 64 inherently hard to work with if u dont have official hardware and to an extent software even nintendo i think has struggled as the 64 was a very powerful console for its time thus emulation is not great and direct ports are messy and time consuming, with the wii tho powerPC might be dead but it plays nicer with arm for a start so the issue lies in the control setup for the wii and how that would map to a vastly different console ie the price might be high but i think more has happened behind the scenes than we can see to get this to work so my honest opinion is the port of galaxy is a test for how well wii games will port to the switch and i guess future consoles, cos honestly i remember the atempt made with the ds on the wii u and i think they dont want to do that one again cos it wasnt the greatest in practice so i think really we who purchase are actually the ginniepigs for when they inevitably release these games as part of online later on XD
Or u know because their bundling some of their most greatest games onto one package.that shit is worth more then 60 dollars really
@@facebooktweeter4948 I wasn't talking about the 60$ price tag, I was talking about the limited time purchase.
The 60$ price tag is _objectively_ steep (if you use Nintendo's most recent pricings for these games as reference, and even if you don't assume any price decay has happened since and don't make any discount for a bundle purchase ~40$ is the "fair" price) but I don't take major issue with it.
The three games in the bundle are massive releases with a lot of content, and Mario 64 in particular is one of the most important games ever made, so charging a premium pricetag isn't out of the question IMO, much like how Nintendo take a while to decay their prices on new releases- It's a right they get to invoke because their release standards are usually so high.
DarthVaderReviews Nintendo games barley go on sale and all their titles that they release is always 60 dollars and they used to charge a lot for sm64.sunshine and galaxy so that’s why I think it could have been priced higher but the fact that it’s still 60 dollars for a lot of content is just surreal.
DarthVaderReviews but I mean even if u weren’t talking about the price tag,I think the price tag has something to do with the limited purchase as I said these games are important and loved by a lot of people and since it’s all gonna be in one package,they obviously couldn’t have made it permant digital.Like it was too good to be true since it’s Nintendo at the end of the day
Nintendo can't understand what fans really want.
Virtual Console should have been included from day 1 of the Nintendo Swtich.
@Sterling Sundby No not really man, I think Nintendo still doesn't know how to use the internet
It's because they want to squeeze every penny out of you
I read somewhere that Nintendo listens to the fans and knows what they want. They are just very selective when it comes to giving fans what they want, and it appears that stuff like Switch themes and VC are too much effort for them to implement. Theyll only give the fans something that requires little effort
@@user-tb9sq5po6z That make no sense since they had already engineered an infrastructure for virtual console for the Wii. They built a new infrastructure with this one
@@imojado7294 Its not that simple. On the switch, they would have to recode many games to show the controls of the joycons/pro controller. I think they've just given up on porting old games simply because of the controls. That's why you can see when they ported Mario sunshine, they even edited fludd's voice when he talks through the controls with mario. Controls arent much of an issue in SNES or NES games because it's rather basic. But the controls get more complicated 64 and onwards and I dont think Nintendo wants to put the effort in
Nintendo is doing Disney's old "Get it before it goes back into the vault!" tactic except even Disney abandoned that in the streaming age.
"Spend money on these games that you still love after 10+ years!"
"Also spend money on this game that will cease to exist in 5 months lmao"
Take a closer look at the date, March/31/2021. And what comes after March 31, April fools. Its probably a joke. They are probably doing that to convince people to buy it.
@@businesscat25 I really doubt that; and even if it were true, it's an extremely predatory business practice. Pretty sure it'd be illegal, actually.
baby shrek that’s misinformation on Nintendo’s part and they could be sued for that. I highly doubt that’s what they’re doing
@@businesscat25 that sounds like what someone desperately grasping for straws would say.
Admit that the Nintendo of today is not the Nintendo you once knew & loved.
@@xaldynnemo47 I think it's illegal with the current japanese laws
They took down Mario Royale for Mario 35, but unlike with the former, it's only playable for 5 months... Nintendo what the hell are you doing?
although beware that the Mario royale is still available
mroyale.net/#main
@@theshovel379 don't let nintendno know
@@rainbowspork hahahaha if it is true, but even if you knew it they did not gain anything by removing it since only 6 people are connected a day :'(
@@theshovel379 nintendo likes to regulate fun, so we can't have it unless we are having fun the way nintendo intended us to have fun
@@rainbowspork True true....Nintendo lately if it's been really weird......
If Nintendo doesn’t want you to legally play their old games...
"THEY'RE ONLY DOING IT FOR THE GREEN STUFF..!"
-Sammyclassicsonicfan, paraphrased
@@Gaddafist23 money is green
@@BinglesP But they're not even doing it for money. Like... they don't let you buy the older games, you gotta get them from a reseller on ebay or some shit, which makes Nintendo 0 money.
@@skeletonwar4445 I know, but I felt like I needed to quote Sammy here
if they WANT me to break the law, i'm gonna break the law
Imediatly after reggie left nintendo and bowser came nintendo became kinda depressing
Bowser, as Reggie before him, has jack shit to say about all of this
To make shit worse, someone did an interview with Doug Bowser and he completely dodged every question (even important ones like fixing online and info about Prime 4) and just said copy and pasted crap that every company in existence says about themselves
@@Jake-jk3yg yea i hope nintendo of japan can do something about him
Wrong, It's been like this since Satoru Iwata passed away
Doug Bowser worked for EA, so of course he’s going to implement the vast majority of their anti-consumer business practices on top of the ones Nintendo already has.
This really opened my eyes about this whole thing. And the worst part is that I’m still going to buy it because I love these games.
i’m buying it for collectors sake. not even gonna open it
edit: okay i also preordered it digitally
Just pirate these games and don’t support these shitty practices that even activision avoided
I "have" to because I only have a switch and 3ds and never got to play sunshine or galaxy so this is the best way to do it. But damn, it freaking pisses me off because I don't have a choice because these will go to absurb prices that you HAVE to pay on ebay come April or May
RolandoDR98 at that point it’d probably be best to buy a Wii and Galaxy right now and then wait for GameCube games to go down in price :/
You still cant play the thousand year door without a disc without it technically being looked down on, or wind waker without a wii u or original hardware (including wii)
I'm glad somebody is experiencing how I felt with Sword and Shield. Just lazy.
Okay, just between you and me and not trying to start a fight, what does “Just lazy” mean to you? Like what does a game need to have or not have to be considered not lazy?
@@TGtornadoe Tree texture that looks better than those of Ocarina of Time N64 ? Sure they were beautiful for they release but in 2019 it's KINDA cringe
Would be a good base.
I mean, tbh... Sword & Shield was absolute shit. Atleast you know how the games on 3D All-Stars are, unlike Sword & Shield. Plus, it‘s 60€ for 3 games while Sword & Shield are like 50€ seperately, plus some DLC... idk
eh...this has issues but I wouldn't say it's as bad or controversial as sword and shield...it isn't a bad collection could be seen as kinda overpriced and lackluster could be better really
Pokemon (and by extension most Nintendo games) hasn't been good since 2012. So glad I jumped ship years ago.
Its because nintendo knows they can get away with it. And get away with it they will. They're nintendo, come on. People will buy it. It will be a success.
That's sadly the way it works with this, they treat consumers and loyal fans like a pet on a leash as if they revolve completely around them, if we ever see remasters of fan favorites it will be unnecessarily glorified by nintendo as if it's something of a privilege to enjoy their products, they have a loyal fan base and they take advantage of that knowledge, it's unfair and they know that they won't be stood up too, look at indie developers giving us things like the Henry stickmin collection, knowing how they need their fan base just as much as they need them, rather than nintendo treating it's fans like a parasite feeding of of it rather then offering support and having that support feel one-sided.
*"People will buy it."*
I won't. Boneheaded and narrow-minded decisions like this are what ruined the Wii U. The Wii U had potential, but they wasted it. Star Fox Zero could've been a success, but because of Nintendo's selfish tunnel vision when it comes to controls, it bombed horribly.
the nintendo switch actually could’ve been a cool console with potential, but guess it’s just an excuse for nintendo to reuse the same old games for $60
The reason I’m interested is because I have never played 64, I did play Sunshine and Galaxy at one point but it’s been several years since then and I need to replay them
I think it's ok with people who havent play any of the games
Nintendo: we love artificial scarcity and scalpers
Bruh why does digital have to be limited it makes sense when physical is limited but digital doesn’t make any sense
I guess to give you a FOMO
Bruh Disney use to do this like years ago with vhs tapes lmao
@@expecos1346 that was some bullshit lmfaoo
The same reason anything else stupid happens, money.
It's cus there gonna make 64 online. My predictions.
Yeah, this is why I’ve started to lose hope in Nintendo. If they don’t change their act soon, Nintendo might end up in a situation where they have no choice but to admit to themselves that they royally screwed up, and not just a simple mama-mia.
Imagine if it's all just an April Fool's joke since it's right before April.
"Yes, but no refunds."
If only...
Honestly, I think Nintendo has been getting kinda worse since 2017. I mean, the Switch is cool, and the games released on it are great, but the accessibility of their older games seems to be decreasing steadily, especially since older games cost so much for their original consoles now.
@Nicolás B Yes, Wii U with free online and virtual console that sold 13 millions of units...
You deserved
@@juancarlosaguilarromero7085 to be fair, Nintendo was at fault for the confusing name and botched marketing.
Notice how every announcement in the direct was some form of an old game
Emuparadise was a great way the play the games I own.
Emuparadise actually still works. all you need is an extention called 'tampermonkey' and some code.
this link contains everything you need: www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/968sm6/a_script_for_easy_downloading_of_emuparadise_roms/
now its the vault
Romuniverse is a good alternative
I remember nintendo purged all the 3ds games
I love Nintendo and never see myself leaving them, but things like this and removing Pikmin 3 and Tropical Freeze from Wii U eshop, joycons having drift after just after a year of use in most cases, which is just past warranty, and the fact that lets be honest, their online service is sub par, but is still a subscription for peer to peer, not even server based multi-player. These things may make them lose me as a loyal customer someday if they don't get their act together. I have been loyal with this company my entire life, one of the 3 and a half people that owned a wii u, thought it was a great console, but things are changing.
The subscription thing people were just allowed to copy microsoft’s scammy trend that they started, nintendo just decided to follow in those ill advised but unpunishable footsteps. Idk how much better of a service sony provided but still.
PC and mobile players: “you guys are paying (to play online)?”
The brought back Pikmin 3 to the e-shop.
@@henrysmarthy286 That doesnt change the fact they removed it, plus Tropical Freeze is still not on the eshop. If there wasnt as much of an outrage over it, they wouldnt have brought it back. It is still an anti consumer move, them bringing it back, does not make it just.
They brought back pikmin to the eshop, but same. Nintendo used to be my heroes, but now I feel like they're in a downward spiral. They're just so scummy nowadays. Maybe i'm just a boomer, but they just don't make their games like they used to.
@@henrysmarthy286 They forgot the dlc
its dumb how they display it like a treat for old fans and a gateway to older games for new fans. Yet they limit its time, the older fans will obviously be eager to buy it straight away but any new fan wouldn't really care as much, leading to less newer fans being able to play
I’ve always been a Nintendo fan, I’d even say I was a defending fanboy back in the Gamecube-WiiU era but the switch era really opened my eyes on how anti consumer Nintendo can really be and made me so much more critical towards the company
Same..
Can you maybe elaborate on that? I don't know a lot about this.. Is it mostly e-shop/remake related?
Same. I feel like / is that most of the modern nintendo games are either rushed or not made well just for $60
Same
@@Clevoliver
Sure, they'd release a quality title once and again, but y'know.. Third parties have kinda been better than nintendo since the new CEO and the start of the switch.
The “so long gay bowser” is no more :(
Now he's Bye-Bi
Your 16 years late
Super mario 64 DS has mario saying buh bye
Before Cuddly Bunny LPS he is double no more
actually its so long bowser
@@KennethPlaysOfficial uh uh
Nintendo will continue these practices so long as people are giving them money. It's impossible for a boycott or revolt to happen because Nintendo have the power of nostalgia and the casual gaming audience on their side who really don't care about what diehard fans are missing, they just consume whatever Nintendo put out. Since Iwata passed Nintendo have followed suit with other greedy business practices from other companies and will continue down this path because it works. Like it or not, Nintendo has changed and will never be the same again, and they will keep pushing the envelope as long as money keeps filling their pockets.
In short: Nintendo is kill
@@Hunterofbones no
And thats why i have a hacked switch, don't get me wrong im a game dev myself and i hate piracy, but as you said it its the only to make a big company listen, i have every nintendo system execpt the original gameboy models and virtual boy, so i really love nintendo but these buisness practices are just wrong
Iwata is dead Reggie has retired. The companies focus on play and quality died with them.
I hope Nintendo changes since they are my childhood. And i know they will
I bet they are going to release all three games later, just separately.
Unfortunately, yeah.
At the same price as the collection probably
And at full price too. lol
nah
@@IMightBeError They might.
*boardroom meeting*
employee#1: “hey how bout we make the physical version a limited supply only!”
employee#2: “OHH OHHH! aaaaaaand make the eshop version available until the 1st quarter of next year!”
boss: “It’s brillant! brillant! brillant!! quick to the secret lab!!”
"PULL THE LEVER NUMBER 1!" *pulls lever* "WRONG LEVER!"
Number 2 slowly turns his head to number 1"this is why the boss likes me more"
@@megasora4 Love the reference!!
I Love Bread
Same
my wife is bread
@@teurdle7720 Then I Love Your Wife
@Ster Bekk of course why wouldnt i
@Ster Bekk Very PogChamp
Nintendo is just not smart or nice when it comes to marketing.
I'm hoping Mario Galaxy 2 will actually be a secret unlock on the actual date of Mario's 35 anniversary.
Sorry bud
Sorry that I’m late
Yeah... let's be optimistic, maybe on the 36th Mario Anniversary?
@@devinhigoy221 or 40th
F
Painfully ignorant
Can we also talk about how there was a fanmade mario battle royale that had relatively similar ideas that nintendo shut down
And then they pull mario 35
yeah by tthe same guy that makes cursed halo (infernoplus).
This guy's a legend
@Elioxis I mean its their property
They've done it with AM2R (Metroid: Samus Returns) and Pixelmon (Pokemon Quest). At this point, making a Nintendo fangame is more like trying to find out what Nintendo is planning in the future.
@@pennysantana247 pixelmon is always one i feel is reaching, since the pixelmon mod had highly realistic pokemon as opposed to quest, which has minecrafty looking pokemon, but you cannot deny AM2R.
It feels like the limited availability of these games has something to do with the end of the Japanese fiscal year being March 31st. They probably want to improve Switch and game sales in the short term for some kind of reason, like impressing shareholders or w/e business people do
damn
It's always the fucking money
@@HandledToaster2 Well they do sell video games, kinda their job to make money.
@Jan Michael Vincent Its quite possible that they may release the games individually after the bundle is over, once the initial sales have died down.
That actually makes a lot of sense. I was unaware of that being Japan's end of financial year. Thanks for the info!
It’s all cuz Bowser took over. Now the villain is out to destroy the whole corporation
oh my god i thought i was the only one who picked up on that
Nintendo has literally always been like this. They’ve been shutting down rom hacks of 10 year old games for over a decade now and I absolutely despise them for it. I’ve never seen a company as patent greedy as Nintendo
Nintendo used to be the frustrating company of “two steps forward, one step back,” but now it looks like they’re only taking one step forward and two steps back, while simultaneously becoming the modern Disney of the video game world, making extremely anti-consumer moves because they know they’re too big to fail. To be honest, I’m done with this. I’m just gonna save up for a PS5 or a good PC. I already own galaxy and galaxy 2 for Wii, and I wholeheartedly plan on emulating sunshine and 64 if I want to play them. I’ve already got dolphin running to play all of the other classics they don’t want me to play, sunshine is no different. As for 64, I’m sure it’s fairly easy to set up, plus I can access amazing hacks the community has made. It’s a much better deal than this whole collection. Nintendo’s job here was to do something more than that to justify a consumer choosing them over emulation and hacking, and they failed even more than I thought they would. I set my expectations at the ground floor of a 600 story building, and they decided to dig out 10 or 20 basements. If I have to play the game Nintendo wants me to just so I can play the video games they’re making, then I’m out. It was a good run, but this is the end for me unless they can make some good stuff (and actually allow people to buy and play it) and clean up their act. Good riddance.
Hey man I'd suggest you get the Mario 64 PC Port instead if emulating it, it's basically the same as the Switch port mentioned in the video but less limited. It's a really complicated process to actually get the game to work but the result is way better than emulation and there are plenty of tutorials out there, I'd imagine.
emulation is epic
I wouldn't save up for a PS5 if I were you. Sony's been pretty screwy as well.
Pedro Lucas I just watched one video tutorial and was able to set it up fine. Just as much headache as anything else on PC gives me. The 60fps and widescreen really make the game feel great. Plus there's tons of other mods to improve the experience, like removing the draw distance for levels.
I agree. I’m upset because they took Mario Battle Royale, and I’m not even all that excited for botw2 or the new remake. I never even really liked those..
How unlucky i found this after purchasing the game.
I'm just glad that the 3d all stars are staying longer than Christmas -
Facts
b r u h
I'm gonna insert a meme here:
Can we have Super Mario 3D All Stars?
Mum/Mom: We have Super Mario 3D All Stars at home.
At home: A Wii with the virtual console super mario 64, sunshine since gamecube games can run on wii, as well as both galaxies.
@@mlau490 or just free money, its easy enough to just emulate it.
Honestly, I think the meme is backwards. 3D All Stars should be the "games at home."
Loving Nintendo is like being in an abusive relationship.
lots of people are afraid to leave abusive relationships soooo.
yeah i guess.
YES LMAO
I do not agree
Nah, more like a struggling marriage. Where one partner wants to pretend everything is alright and that they don't need to make an effort
Yeah but like, nintendo posts stuff on social media and youtube community somewhat often. Theyre not oblivious to all the people complaining. In fact sometimes it seems like they enjoy some of the anger directed at them.
Honestly I'd rather have just gotten the Virtual Console store back
Too much effort.
@@user-tb9sq5po6z Nintendo is too lazy, so I agree about that. Seriously, why can't they just remake the entire Virtual Console store by matching the UI with the Switch's theme, and rename the Wii Points to Switch Points? And I also think that you should be able to get achievements inside games to get the Switch Points, then spend Switch Points on Virtual Console games? And why not more themes you can buy with Switch Points? Seriously Nintendo, STOP BEING LAZY and GIVE US VIRTUAL CONSOLE BACK
@@nexutrosity Nintendo wouldn't make much money off of VC then. Your suggestion is nice, but it isn't profitable. Nintendo want to make money while putting in as little effort as possible, save for their occasional innovative releases every 5 years or so to save face.
I feel really upset towards Nintendo as a company, everyday they are becoming more cold-hearted towards their fans and what they do for them, they're becoming as souless as Disney!
@paula Did you watch this video?
@paula ...With a 6-month time limit for little to no reason.
@@opossumontheinternet9864 if the game actually never sees the light of day again it would just be more confusing unless Nintendo is purposefully doing this and secretly the scalpers so they can sell the games for hundreds of dollars onlinem
@@maximumforce8275 Yeah, but i don't see a reason to help scalpers.
@@opossumontheinternet9864 bruh I said what 8f Nintendo ARE the scalpers
Nintendo: Piracy is no party!
Also Nintendo: What’s a GameCube?
Nintendo: Makes a game that remasters 3 Mario games from original consoles.
Also Nintendo: *Puts an unnecessary deadline on it's time to be bought.*
It is Bc it is like anniversary event
You better work your butt off before March 2021 lmfao
@@Spicy3ango we know, but it's just a stupid decision for Nintendo to make it limited when if you have a n64, GameCube or wii you can just get it for like 20 bucks.
@@ethanmcgowan4693 you do realize Sunshine by itself is still valued at nearly $60, right?
they call it all star.... like the allstar that had mario bros, mario bros the lost levels(jp 2), mario bros 3, and mario bros 2... which had a limited time, non-resale version (in NA) that had mario world (with updated luigi sprite). That's 4 games, 5 with the + world version. Which was what they had at that time for main mario games. Yet they didnt even bother to add New Super Mario bros wii/wiiu, nor any of that sort that were on the handhelds, nor the ds version of M64. It's not about whether or not there was a galaxy 2 in it, its about the fact that they didn't even bother to add the other games in, sure they aren't the same kind of 3d, but they shouldve at least compensated with that to make it have that 60 dollar earning.
The scary part is that there are actually people that saw the announcement and made comments along the lines of "bruh this limited release is just gonna encourage piracy" or "bruh where's galaxy 2", and when they did there were some motherfuckers down there DEFENDING this practice.
"Emulation is sTeAlInG, the oFfIcIaL way is better!!!!!! gO tO jAiL!!!!!!!!"
"It's to drive up dEmAnD and make mOrE pEoPlE buy the game, SHUT UP!!!!!!"
"Can't buy it immediately? jUsT wOrK aNd gEt mOnEy!!!!"
"gAlAxY 2 wAs uNnEcEsSaRy!!!!!!!"
Some even making fun of people that wanted galaxy 2, insinuating they're "too greedy" or "ask for too much".
Like, fucking seriously? It's people like them that NORMALIZE these shitty practices and are ENCOURAGING Nintendo to be lazy with these ports.
Wtf i saw no one saying that
Wow
@@malikmalikmalikmalikma have you been living under a rock or you don't have twitter installed?
I really hate those idiots, they are the reason Nintendo is slowly becoming like EA.
@@ali-kun7038
I have Twitter, but i don't follow nintendo there
i honestly hope that if the internet protests hard enough they'll reconsider, but i know that won't happen...
We all know how Nintendo doesnt tend to listen to fans
Unlimited Duck not entirely true. Smash bros ultimate for instance has done nothing but what the fans wanted.
@@jacobsmith7094 its true, I'm a smash fan and I love the trash online!
Video Games are Cool I know right! The toxic fanbase too, it’s so good!
@@jacobsmith7094 Really? *cough*waluigi*cough*
The limited time offer is something Blizzard does aswell with their WoW ingame shop. It forces people to buy the product now so they don't miss out on it. However limited time offer does not mean they can't take it up later again which is what they are going to do. It's a trick to get more people buying it now and not missing out on people buying it later at the same time. However people buying it sooner is better than later since they can use the money right now and due to inflation lowering the value of the money later.
It's a scummy thing and I'm tired of people seeing different developers as "the good guys" : (Nintendo) and others as the "the bad guys": (EA , Activision etc.)
Meanwhile super Mario 3d Land:
Guess they forgot about me.... Again..
Probably wasnt retro enough. It was for the 3ds.
Aradia Megido eh idk 3ds is nearly 10 years old wii is 13 going on 14 there is only 4 to 5 years in between. Really I believe it may be because it’s a handheld. Even if the switch is a hybrid these are all home console games which could be why it was left out.
Future Nintendo be like: *LETS MAKE SUPER MARIO 4D WORLD FOR THE NINTENDO*
Eww 3D land
@@itchyskinbag 3d land is a very well designed game, even if it isn't that interesting story or locationwise.
Its still pretty scummy that they would just blatantly steal that one guys mario battle royale idea.
Nintendo can be very creative/innovative sometimes but the fact that they can't let their fanbase be like that completely nullifies this. Also, one of the only reasons Sega are still active is that they don't restrict the use of sonic by fans, and it shows.
@@lukealias1uk345 Mario Fans: So, we made a PC port of Mario 64 by reverse-engineering the game's source code, and it includes widescreen, 60 FPS, and 4K support----
Nintendo: A POX UPON THEE! (DMCAs them)
Christian Whitehead: So, I ported Sonic CD to the iPhone using a brand new engine that's accurate to the original game and made a bunch of quality-of-life improvements to the game....
SEGA: Dude, would you like to work with us?
Sega are still opposites to Nintendo even now. They aren't good game developers (even though they try) and they make more moral decisions for their company and genuinely care about their fans. Nintendo are good game designers but are corporate monsters that make decisions based on profit. That is why I now prefer indie games. They are everything Sega is and they are everywhere, making games they care about.
Sega has made some good sonic games mind you, they just don't have the best track record
It could be a coincidence.
@@rjd1922 It literally can't be. They threatened legal action against the guy who originally made it and it was a whole thing going around the internet for like 2 weeks.
Maybe I shouldn’t have watched a video that makes people see this game for what it truly is. I was caught up by nostalgia I didn’t even realize how terrible this is.
I'm sorry
Gonz no it’s fine, I still really want it because my nostalgia controls me
@@therealzmg I pre-ordered it immediately after the announcement because I'm weak and I feel the need to own any kind of sunshine rerelease.
This is why nostalgia is a problem. It allows companies like Nintendo to do the bare minimum because they know weebs on Twitter are fantasizing about stuff like 3D all stars all the time and will buy their products regardless of quality.
Gore Magician not to mention that crash and Spyro trilogies were complete remakes and were sold also at 60 or even cheaper in certain places, and yet Nintendo sells this bare minimum at $60 because they know people are drones that don’t know you can play these games with dolphin