@@Nik_FPV24 it will very likely cover even that, btw two days ago i turned a non functional tinywhoop with damaged motor cables and i used your method to remove the connectors becouse i was about to use a b2 tip lol (one of the motors give up mid-air for some reason..)
Do you think the Draknight or Petrel85 is a better 2s? I'm thinking of getting the Petrel85. Probably go open props eventually. I just want a good flying 2s.
They are both pretty good drones. I enjoyed flying petrel85 more, it has better motors, it's faster and more durable so there are dacts. The advantages of Draknight is that it has a little more inertia, which brings it closer to a “freestyle” drone, also it comes with a camera mount like RunCam thumb or insta go and can be used as a cinewhoop, but for all this it is better to buy drones designed for this purpose. And for learning fpv and just for fun I would choose petrel85
I had gotten 3 happymodel crux3's over a year and a half span and their all in one controllers had 15 to 30 uses before the video would stop working for no reason mid flight, they were crashed rarely keep in mind, 1 or 2 each working fine after. replaced the camera and was getting a constant on and off video signal before the rest of the all in one would just lose their code and quit working once reprogrammed frying a motor here and there. They were awesome they were just limited in use and durability for high prices, I wish they were more durable so builds like the one shown here don't have to be a fly for 2 weeks and pay a fortune or lose a nerve trying to troubleshoot and fix it type of deal. Its a shame really because they are just too cool especially when its one you built yourself, the disappointment is immeasurable when they stop working due to disposable high cost parts
I told you, it's not a new drone, I got it by hand and a bit broken. But I got it even a little cheaper, $50 with a set of five batteries. Try looking for this on used goods sites in your area
There were several reasons for this, the main ones being that I don't like the quality of the RunCam nano4 and I already had a replacement camera when the drone came to me. But maybe I will fix this camera and use it somewhere else in the future in another project
100th sub!!! ^^ also waaaa!? Thats so adorable! :0 so cool! You flying really great!
Thanks a lot bro🫶🏼
Great Video! i also have the sequere s99 and its a great budget soldering iron, one day i hope to see your channel become bigger and bigger!
Thanks for the kind words! Yes this soldering iron does cover all drone build needs, at least anything smaller than 6s
@@Nik_FPV24 it will very likely cover even that, btw two days ago i turned a non functional tinywhoop with damaged motor cables and i used your method to remove the connectors becouse i was about to use a b2 tip lol (one of the motors give up mid-air for some reason..)
Do you think the Draknight or Petrel85 is a better 2s? I'm thinking of getting the Petrel85. Probably go open props eventually. I just want a good flying 2s.
draknight, it's FC goes up to 4s I believe
They are both pretty good drones. I enjoyed flying petrel85 more, it has better motors, it's faster and more durable so there are dacts. The advantages of Draknight is that it has a little more inertia, which brings it closer to a “freestyle” drone, also it comes with a camera mount like RunCam thumb or insta go and can be used as a cinewhoop, but for all this it is better to buy drones designed for this purpose. And for learning fpv and just for fun I would choose petrel85
Yes 4s is good, but the current on esc is 12A…
I had gotten 3 happymodel crux3's over a year and a half span and their all in one controllers had 15 to 30 uses before the video would stop working for no reason mid flight, they were crashed rarely keep in mind, 1 or 2 each working fine after. replaced the camera and was getting a constant on and off video signal before the rest of the all in one would just lose their code and quit working once reprogrammed frying a motor here and there. They were awesome they were just limited in use and durability for high prices, I wish they were more durable so builds like the one shown here don't have to be a fly for 2 weeks and pay a fortune or lose a nerve trying to troubleshoot and fix it type of deal. Its a shame really because they are just too cool especially when its one you built yourself, the disappointment is immeasurable when they stop working due to disposable high cost parts
Yes unfortunately there is such a problem with product quality in fpv…
50 dollars for the petrel 85? Can you send a links?
Would love some links aswell, all i can find is 130+
I told you, it's not a new drone, I got it by hand and a bit broken. But I got it even a little cheaper, $50 with a set of five batteries. Try looking for this on used goods sites in your area
Camera technology isn't there yet. Well... not that's affordable for something like this.
Why didnt you fix the origional cam you could of just glued back on the lens mount to the pcb it would of taken 2 mins
There were several reasons for this, the main ones being that I don't like the quality of the RunCam nano4 and I already had a replacement camera when the drone came to me. But maybe I will fix this camera and use it somewhere else in the future in another project