KSP: Scott Manley's 70k Challenge - Maximum Cheese (

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
  • After my previous attempt ( • KSP: Scott Manley's 70... ) to complete Scott Manley's 70k challenge ( • Shortest Possible Spac... ) I had a decent time of 2:02, but that wasn't good enough... So this time I made a much bigger ship, clocking in at almost 1000 parts. I was able to score a time of 1:30 even (one could probably argue 1:29). Ironically, seeing as the beast made my machine lag so much, the actual video is significantly longer.
    This footage is all from the fantastic game Kerbal Space Program... if you haven't already... heck even if you have, get it on Steam or buy a copy: buy.kerbalspace...

Комментарии • 16

  • @moEGGz
    @moEGGz 10 лет назад +1

    The winner of this challenge will be decided by counting frames past a second tick I believe. I don't think the minute mark will be broken, my guess is the winner is in the 1:10-1:15 range.

  • @Xenro66
    @Xenro66 10 лет назад +3

    I can't continue to improve my time of 2:23 for 2 reasons.
    1: I use FAR. I will *never* get rid of it, even for a challenge. EVER
    2: Computer is way too crappy to build a nice powerful rocket with a bunch of the advanced engines and those cheat-ish physics-less engines
    Either way, Matthew, I believe you can do even better than 1:30 :D

  • @NecroBones
    @NecroBones 10 лет назад +1

    That's insane. Nicely done!

  • @tsviper
    @tsviper 10 лет назад +12

    Nice one. liked the staging on the rcs motors.

    • @jebodle8331
      @jebodle8331 10 лет назад

      Speaking of which, I was playing around with this setup earlier on the launchpad. Although the ship should have had more than enough TWR it just stays on the pad until some point I can't quite determine and then shoots off the pad as it immediately realizes it should be moving. Anyone know what I'm missing? My searches haven't found anything.

    • @Tsevion.7
      @Tsevion.7  10 лет назад +1

      Jeb Odle I've had similar things happen, sometimes I think the ship geometry clips the ground and gets stuck.

  • @Thesnakerox
    @Thesnakerox 10 лет назад +4

    What if you tried lithobraking instead of parachuting?

  • @HanSolo-dh4rn
    @HanSolo-dh4rn 10 лет назад

    This deserves a sub, methinks

  • @als19981
    @als19981 10 лет назад +1

    Nahhh, needs more boosters...

  • @DoctyrEvil
    @DoctyrEvil 9 лет назад

    Henster is all business.

  • @freezey600
    @freezey600 10 лет назад

    stop making Scott Manley cry in the corner because your better then him!

  • @TrikeSquadron
    @TrikeSquadron 10 лет назад

    hmm good run... although.. you landed on the mountains which means 3000 some meters higher than the lift off point. might be a technical penalty for that. love the RCS staging !

    • @moEGGz
      @moEGGz 10 лет назад +5

      The challenge is to get to space and then land on Kerbin as quickly as possible. So his using the mountains is not him cheating or breaking the rules. It's just a smart decision. :)

    • @matsv201
      @matsv201 10 лет назад

      mo' eggs What about lifting up from the mountin.... lift from the top most.. i think 7000 meters or so eliminate a lot of air resistance.

  • @expioreris
    @expioreris 10 лет назад

    your clock is slow

    • @TomFoster1996
      @TomFoster1996 10 лет назад +5

      as he said in the description, when KSP has large numbers of parts loaded time pases slower in game meaning that 1 min in KSP may take 1:30 in real life