What If Celtic Europe Survived? | Alternate History
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- In Collaboration With Fire Of Learning ( / fireoflearning ) We Bring You The In Depth History Of The European Celts, And How A Celtic Nation State Could Have Formed Had Carthage Won The Second Punic War. You Can Find The Rest Of The Video Here, On Fire Of Learning's Channel:
#AlternateHistory #MonsieurZ #Celts
New Videos Every Wednesday At 2:30 PM EST
__
Website: usofz.com/
__
Patreon: / monsieurz
__
Merchandise: teespring.com/...
__
Music Used: • Video
__
Guest Stars: / fireoflearning
I thought Z had a voice issue for a fleeting moment
so did i xD
Ya
Great stuff, thanks for watching everybody.
The god himself
Hello
Part Two Is Delayed, But Should Be Released By End Of The Day, Link Will Be Here When Available: ruclips.net/video/U_PvqE9PD8I/видео.html
Do you think it was at all possible that japan could've joined the central powers instead of the entente in ww1?
Jett Herrin possibly Japan still may of had a lust to expand into Russian Siberia, French Indochina and the American Philippines. The only reason the Japanese joined the Entente was because of the British who they allied themselves with because of the Russians, of the alliance with the British was never made it is highly possible since most of the Entente powers had land around Japan which could convince japan to join the central powers
@@deadchannel1880 that might've been the force that the central powers needed to win, with japan's help it's possible that russia could've been subdued earlier.
what if the Mongols discovered the Americas from the northwest
Owen K. Indeed I’m part of many communities small or big
What if The Enclave and Brotherhood of Steel United what is the fate of Vegas,NCR and the Wasteland as a whole?
Edit: It make sense since the Enclave is what remains of the U.S Government while the Brotherhood has ties to the U.S Army before revolting
Yeah but the brotherhood left the government because of the shady enclave experiments they were doing
What if Zoroastrianism replaced Islam? Or Zoroastrianism remained in Persia.
I am Persian and fuck zoroastrianism and western pigfuckers
@@ahmadfrhan5265 you know thats the religion of your ancestors right?
@@ahmadfrhan5265 im not saying you should be a Zoroastrian, I merely am trying to say you should have some kind of respect for them, in fact I honestly dont care what your religion is
AHMED FRHAN wtf. Dude, are you ok? I am here if you want to talk about anything
@@ahmadfrhan5265 sure "ahmed' thats arab not iranian
The celts did oppose occupation. That is why 75% of them died. The Romans conquered them and the Celts tried to rebel, which failed and ended in them being massacred.
The Julian genocide 58-51 BC?
Vöfflur didn’t get Scotland though!
@@madlad9822 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mons_Graupius
I used to think that to mate, but they still invaded the shit out of it. Harsh terrain and locals made them think twice about annexing it.
After reading about the celts sure they were more of cultural group than a genetic groups. The celts in Turkey and the celts in Scotland likely had almost no genetic relation.
Most researchers believe it was a spreading culture mixed with scattered conquests that didn’t fundamentally change the genetic makeup of the areas it reached.
And the Celts had vast culturally diversity internally it’s very unlikely 75% of them ever died, just were assimilated into another culture and mixed genetically again with invading barbarians.
@@Gamenetreviews yeah idk why people are saying the Celts died they never did actually most Brits have atleast 50% of celt in them or around that so they were only assimilated probably
Wait if the Anglo-Saxons never invaded the British isles and the Romano-Britons survived?
They did to a small degree in Wales and Cornwall. Their genes are a part of the English and ironically, the Vikings took so many Celts as slaves that as much as 20% of modern Scandinavians genes are Celtic.
@@jelkel25 more likely irish celts tho in Scandinavian
@Shy'mFan2007 thanks, Richard the Lionheart only went to England 6,7 times but is "English". England was a bonus to normans
Europe is for the Celts. Skyrim is for the Nords.
He's pining for the fjords
@evansdrad germanic people not only include germans but also english and nords(scandinavians)
Nords are the other group in Britain.
Except that they are mixed Celtic-Nordic in all cases.
How bout you keep france and leave the rest of europe alone
My Father comes from Serbia from the City of Nis. Nis has a VERY LONG history and is maybe the oldest Town in Europe. It is said the Town has been established 6000 BC!!!! The Celts were the inhabitans and they called Nis back then Navissos. Their Druids called this place "Elbentaal" which means Valley of the Elves because it was a place that was so beautiful that the Celts thought some kind of magic is needed to make this place so beautiful. The Family of my Fathers side is also a long one (over 180 years with proven evidence in the Citys Archive) and there were drawings of the forest which my long Grandfather painted it and i can see the beauty of the Forests which he painted. I saw them too of course (3 years ago which also was the last time ive been in nis) and i can understand why the Druids called it elbentaal. I never thought that Nis or even the Balkans had anything to do with Celts but DAMN i almost belive that the Celts were the next oldest race of the Homo Sapiens of Europe and that we all originate from them.
Vinca je starija
Minocia was made in pre-bronze age, sooo
Can you make a video on the problems of modern day school system
@@truthisbuoyant5825 Indoctrination mainly, really learn nothing except the same things meant to make us feel bad over and over.
Ugh I wish we could get more histories with some of these, Like would this Celtic-Roman Alliance survive or would the relationship fall apart and the two war for dominance over western Europe and the Mediterranean sea
You're probably full of these and I can't help but contribute my own ideas.
1. What if Richard III won at Bosworth Field?
2. What if the Mali Empire colonized America?
3. What if the Polynesians colonized Australia?
4. What if the Sepoy Mutiny succeeded?
5. What if the Black Death never happened?
6. What if China modernized?
7. What if the Sykes-Picot Agreement never happened?
8. What if Islam had a Reformation?
9. What if Japan won the Imjin War?
10. What if China never unified?
11. What if Ireland unified earlier?
12. What if Haiti lost the Revolution?
13. What if the Aztecs beat the Spanish?
14. What if the Inca Empire survived?
15. What if Ethiopia was a superpower?
16. What if Ned Kelly's plan succeeded?
Now THIS is an alternate history channel!
Never thought of a Confederation of the Rhine scenario in Celtic Gaul. Fascinating prospect. A question though, how would Carthage manage to conquer Ptolemaic Egypt and go all the way to Abyssinia?? I guess maybe a stratagem of divide and conquer: artificially increase tension between the native Copts and the Greek colonists, then swoop in to take advantage if this time of weakness. Only thing I can think of. And why would an exult Carthage go all the way to Abyssinia, or even be able to? And why would Rome take direct control of such far away lands instead of setting up puppet kings and vassal birder states , kind of like what they did in the Caucus and in Arabia (the latter allowing for a future Islam to be able to conquer things so swiftly after being forcibly unified by a single religion)?
The celts are still here alive full glory in Scotland.
Also there seems to be evidence that becoming a druid was generally a path open to both men and women, and one of the better options women had in celtic societies back then.
I'm from wales so celtic nation would be good for me
1 what if Egypt stayed Pagan
2 what if the Kalmar Union reunited
3 what if Africa became a single country
4 what if South Africa apartheid Survived
5 what if The Caribbean islands united into a Caribbean Federation
6 what if general douglas macarthur Became president of the United states
7 What if Communist china collapsed
8 What if Brazil Stayed a Empire
9 What if The Turkish states United into a Single country
10 What if Nuclear Weapons never existed
Bass Cannon Jake 2 awesome ideas, honestly my favorite is a longer lasting Brazilian Empire.
@Owen K. I do actually after the last video i brainstormed about 30 alternate history possibilities within a hour .
@Owen K. Thank you and i Just finished Brainstorming 11 more alternate history possibilities .
Nice
Bass Cannon Jake 2 Correction what if the middle east and the rest of that he'll hole just disappeared and became an ocean or something
Wow, that bit at the end with languages is real cool!
For example the word for horse in Gaulish is stated to be 'Caballo'
That is also the Spanish word for horse like exactly.
Love this video and I've got to say, you should be proud of it .
In 3:39 you said: in particular the gallic tribes in modern day French. I hope you understand that Gallia didn't only exist of land in modern they french but fore example also in Belgium, Belgica.
What if Israel lost the 6 Day War and Palestine was reestablished?
Top fucking Kek thats what
The West Bank was part of Jordan at the time, and there was no previous sovereign Palestinian state to "reestablish", so it's most likely that neighboring Arab countries would just annex whatever parts of Israel they can to themselves.
Incredibly interesting stuff id be able to enjoy it if there wasnt 10 ads inbetween
There are some of England who still regard them selves as having Celtic blood northern England and Cornwall
One thing but I have seen a few sources mentioning celtic armours from the time of the wars with Rome, and given how they weren't absolutely slaughtered I'd imagine the fighting naked part was a very limited thing, probably only being a very niche part of an army, more akin to Norse Berserkers than like the main celtic infantry.
Ya, the celts are credited with the invention of mail armour, its just a zealous minority that liked CQS
Great video, glad to see my people finally have a video.
What if the U.S. never implemented the Marshall Plan or What if European imperialism never ended and decolonization never happened?
What if France never help USA to have his independance ??? What if Caesar never exist to manage the Roman army to invade Gaule ?
1. Would mean more suffering in western Europe and more Communist infulence 2. Would mean Great power disputes and American Anti-Europeanisim forming.
I don't like how uncultured and barbaric this makes the Kilts sound.
"No technological development"
Like actually what? Keltoi introduced the Roman's to chainmail. They invented soap (Roman's were using vinegar and -urine- to bathe). A carnyx is crafted from different metals made to resemble the bone, plates and organs of a boar's head so it can sound as realistic as possible when played.
So many issues I had with this video's stance (mainly it seems they think it'd be a miracle they would've been able to unify whatsoever), but the lack of technology sh*t lost me.
Just because they didn't build seige machines didn't mean their chariots weren't pieces of art.
Not only this, but to assume that Celts would abandon their own form of governance because (obviously) Roman and Greecian systems were blatantly so much better says a lot about the tone this video essay is giving off.
Like, the Greco-Romans were much better at enforcing themselves and their governments on other civilizations, but just because they're better at conquering doesn't mean it's a better system.
And yes, warfare has always been a part of the spread of humanity, without a doubt. But until only a few thousand years ago, war was generally between warriors, not against whole-ass civilizations. You wanted to beat their army, so you can take over their territory. (In their minds) if you kill all their people, then you have to import your own farmers to work their land too. So typically in ye olden times it's not good to be known as the dickhead king who slaughters errbody, because then you give everyone else a common enemy to unite against. A very old system of checks and balances.
This isn't fully applicable in the modern day, but we can learn from it to create a better system than G-R punitive "justice". Instead of a system based on punishing offenders, we could have a system geared towards restoring the Peace of the Land.
Anyone is allowed free movement and hospitality so long as they never use enforcement to justify themselves (including forceful speech). The only justification for force is Counter-Force.
Awesome Monsieur Z! I love the idea, what’s up next?
wow great video the only bad part is the sound levels i turned it up to hear and then the voice changed and blew my ear drum out. thanks
The audio was a little mismatched, but still good video.
What if the Boers won the second Anglo-Boer war.
What if Eugene Terre Blanche survives and regains control of all former Boer republic territories.
Poul Anderson wrote a story called "Delenda Est" in which time travelers from the future went back and caused Rome to lose against Carthage. The resulting world had western Europe controlled by a hybrid Kelto-Carthagenian culture. One of the problems the Kelts had was they could never unify for long before breaking apart again.
A better starting point or point of divergence was the Celtic sack of Rome, if they had brought more forces and realized the threat of Rome and decided to burn Rome to the ground, salt the Earth and kill or sell into slavery all Romans with Brennas forming a Celtic Empire from the Rhine and Danube in the East to Ireland in the West from Southern Italy and Spain in the South to Holland and Scotland in the North.
I like how you included Northern Spain as a Celtic area
It was. The Gallician's of the North-West still have traces of Celtic ancestry.
Many Irish people can trace back there ancestry to Celtic Galicians who travelled north and settled in Ireland.
Harper walsh No, modern Irish and Brits descend from the Indo-European Bell Beakers, not some Iberian tribe. Whether or not Bell Beakers brought Celtic is up for debate, but I favor the theory that the Bell Beakers spoke an unknown Indo-European language similar to Celtic, but was replaced when Celtic elites came to the Isles in the Iron Age and imposed Celtic onto the peasants.
Sources:
www.nature.com/articles/nature25738
www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/21/arrival-of-beaker-folk-changed-britain-forever-ancient-dna-study-shows
@@skeleton2082 most recent DNA analyses show him to be right. Specifically the people in western Ireland share more genetic ancestry with people in northern Spain than they do for continental Europe and even Britons.
Need more of this collab
NO MIXING
there are still Celtic people in Ireland, Scotland, Isle of Man, Wales, Cornwall
All Druids did part of their training in the UK, no matter where they hailed from they made the trip
Yep the Druidic epicentre of the Celtic word was the isle of mona, which is Ynys Mon/ Anglesey today.
Good one, more collaborations if possible.
Came here from Fire's channel. The Z in your profile pic looks exactly like my local coffee brand, Zoegas' logo. Good job
1. what if Charles Curtis became President
2. What if Thomas R. Marshall became president
3 What if Edith Wilson ran for the office of president
4 What if Maragret Thatcher did not resign and england had a second civil war due to the poll tax
5 what if Neville Chamberlain's half-brother Joseph became PM
6 What if everyone died at the Conservative Conference at grand hotel in 1984
7 What if Harold Wilson never resigned
8 What if either John Connolly of Texas or Ronald Regan became Nixon's VP instead of Gerald Ford
9. What if Enoch Powell became PM
10. What if Britain lost the Falklands in the Falklands War
that was a Celtic empire, or the gallic empire. . The Gallic Empire (Latin: Imperium Galliarum) or the Gallic Roman Empire are names used in modern historiography for a breakaway part of the Roman Empire that functioned de facto as a separate state from 260 to 274.It originated during the Crisis of the Third Century, when a series of Roman military leaders and aristocrats declared themselves emperors and took control of Gaul and adjacent provinces without attempting to conquer Italy or otherwise seize the central Roman administrative apparatus.
It was established by Postumus in 260 in the wake of barbarian invasions and instability in Rome, and at its height included the territories of Germania, Gaul, Britannia, and (for a time) Hispania. After Postumus' assassination in 268 it lost much of its territory, but continued under a number of emperors and usurpers. It was retaken by Roman emperor Aurelian after the Battle of Châlons in 274.
Hello Celtic brothers
Gaul and Galicia are false friends, actually. Gaul is from a Germanic word for ‘foreigner’ (thus cognate to Wales; French likes to add a G to Germanic W, compare ‘war’ and _guerre_). The Latin name however, is Gallia, which is unrelated to the modern name, but may be related to Galicia. I'd like to see an explanation of the single L, though.
As the start of this video, I though that either Monsieur Z has a voice issue, or that this was an old video of his.
Monsieur, this is an Interesting scenario, but with a LOT of issues.
This is not intended to be rude or to hate on the creator of the Video, but is simply correcting or asking about what is wrong about this scenario.
1. How did Rome simply "unite" the Gallic tribes? It is well known that Gallic Tribes (and celtic tribes in general) were not particularly all friendly to eachother. Another thing they aren't friendly to is outside influence. The only true unifier in Gallic History was Rome, when it decided to conquer the region. Why would they simply bend their knee to Rome, which, keep in mind, at this point is far more militarily incapable than it was in Caeser's time, and was already fighting a war that you yourself said they were losing. It is simply not possible for Rome to establish this Confederation at any point during the Punic Wars.
2. How did Carthage conquer Egypt? That would be impossible. Carthage's Army was not capable enough to pull off such a feat. The Ptolemaic Dynasty had a very capable and strong Military Force at this point in history, and, most importantly, wasn't internally fractured (though killings happened inside of the family for it's existence, they were not as major and none actively fought actual battles to gain the throne, except notable examples) Carthage would have an exceedingly hard time entering Egypt, and an even harder time Conquering it. The map also shows Carthage as advancing as far south as Beja and the Kush. That's also impossible. It would be very hard to transport Carthaginian Supplies south to the Kush and Beja, especially as the Egyptians would not have given the Carthaginians the pleasure of bending their knee. There's simply no way Carthage conquers all of this.
3. How does the "Gallic Confederation" stay united? Disregarding how impossible it is to form at this time, or, at any time, the Celts weren't a unified culture. The Celts were a group of cultures, such as how Germanics aren't a unified culture. The Celts wouldn't like being ruled by another Celt simply because "oh, they're celt. I'm also celt. nice.". Celts were constantly at eachothers throats. What is actually more likely is that an Alliance between non-incorporated Gallic Tribes and Germanic Tribes would form. This Alliance would be unlike anything seen before, and the already fairly disunited and unstable Confederation of Gaul would have a VERY hard time holding itself together and fighting a major war. (rome would also be of no help, with no roman holdings in gaul, roman senators and generals would see fit to wait for gaul to collapse, and then conquer regions within gaul for themselves. The romans acted in the interests of rome, even when allies were concerned)
4. How did they conquer Britannia and Hibernia? There is no way that they would be able to conquer Britannia. The Romans had a very hard time, at the height of their power, holding Britain. It required 2 Legions, while all of Hispania only needed 1. They'd also not have the resources to take the two islands. An alliance similar to the prior mentioned one would likely also form. Gallic Ambitions in Britannia and Hibernia would be just that - ambitions, and not a possibility.
5. Why would Celto-iberians want to join the Confederation? There was a significant difference in Culture and Language between Celts in Gaul, and Celts in Hispania, including RELIGIOUS differences. The Celts would be hard pressed trying to get another Celtic Culture to join their disunited, fractured state.
6. How does Carthage conquer lands in the Arabian Peninsula and Ethiopia? This is genuinely getting to stupidly bad levels of fiction. Carthage does not have the military power required to pacify Ethiopia, especially as Ethiopia was a fairly civilised and well settled Empire at the time, and would have no troubles facing Carthage, which would suffer from supply problems and manpower issues, as well as the loyalty of their men being questionable at best. For Arabia? I do not believe I need to explain how it is bad. Carthage could never conquer even a moderately large Swath of Arabia. The Romans tried, and failed, at the height of their power.
Agreed on your unification questions I would think instead of making one large Celtic Empire I would think Rome would make dozens of smaller Celtic kingdoms that would be easier to bully around if need be
Vercingétorix unified Gaule not Caesar !!! Caesar like all the dictatore just fight for his own goals.
Caesar = UE ; not for me !!!
wow what a cool crossover!
4:20 you disribe British Celts well(who on an island were frozen in time for 300), but not the Gauls which you make it seem like your talking about. 7:00 the celts invented maille, the Spatha, and the roman helmet and shield were based on Celtic ones. 10:21 before caersar proto-Orleans was the center of the druids. also Gaul had more men and gold then Italy at this point. 14:30 the gauls would have wons if they won alesia which could be if the german merc cav didnt breakthough the gallic line and/or the gallic cav charge them. 14:40 gallic pop pre rome was 8 mil after it was about 3mil
Great collab guys, but you should've said something earlier in the Video, took me until you explained that it was a collab until I figured out why Z sounded like FoL ^^
Very Interesting.
Okay, I have some problems with this one.
1) You have the technological relationships completely backwards, at least when it comes to weapons. Most of the traditional roman "kit" is not Italian. The iconic Imperial Gallic for example was based directly off of Gallic helmets. So was the earlier Coolus helmet. And the gladius hispaniensis was (as you can tell by the name) the weapon of Celtiberians initially. In fact, there's a high chance that the word gladius is a loanward from Italian celts (kladimos). A wealthy Celtic warrior during the time of Caesar would be better armed then a legionary. So the problem for the Celtic tribes of Gaul isn't inferior tech, but inferior mass manufacturing and weaker military philosophy.
2) This is mostly based on Roman sources and doesn't account for archaeological evidence of high local organization. While never as advanced as Roman engineering, the celts did indeed construct roads, artificial islands, and bridges. Their failure was due to the small scale of their organization. At the same time, you are correct that they would unite in the face of huge threats.
3) When you so say a radical change to their approach to Gaul, you mean an impossible one. Rome had client states in Gaul, yes. But the Roman's own cultural trauma involving the Gauls was as powerful as it was with Carthage. There is no world where the Romans would consider creating a unified Gallic nation because that would be an existential threat to Rome.
4) You have misunderstood the entire character of the Carthaginian Empire. Carthage was a hegemonic merchant power, using it's military to expand influence and rarely to just hold territory. The Barca's are an exception. The Gaul's wouldn't feel threatened by the Carthaginians be A) Carthage wasn't stupid enough to attack Gaul in it's overstretched state and B) Because they wouldn't feel any kinship to the celtiberians or a few southern Gallic tribes.
An improved version of this is the Gallic Wars uniting the Gauls, as it very nearly did. If it hadn't been Caesar leading the Romans and if he had made any major mistakes, Caesar's reputation would become that of Crassus. He united all Northern Gaul against an existential threat to their independence: Himself. The man boasted (and obviously he's exaggerating but it's pretty telling about his own personality) about killing two million gauls and specifically includes the civilians in that count. His campaigns in Gaul could have been enough to prove that Gaul needed to unite to face the Romans. And at that point, history is thrown on it's head. Imperial Rome will never have existed or would have taken a drastically different form. The Gauls become a powerful kingdom but are most likely overwhelmed by the Germanic and Hunnic invaders. Christianity stays in Southern Europe and the Middle-East if it spreads at all. Western Europe's culture becomes a celti-germanic mix and Rome simply becomes another ancient empire forgotten to time.
...Monsieur Z? Your voice changed. XD
Hey Z, you should do a collab with Survive the Jive
I guess you could say the expansion of Rome initially was just revenge for us kicking their arses originally 😋😁
I'm Cornish, I approve.
Not quite the specific scenario I was hoping for, as I was wondering about the post Romano-Celts of Britain sucessfully repulsing the Angles/Saxons/Jutes and maintaining control of the isles. But I'll take it.
Honestly that scenario is almost impossible, after Boudica's rebellion fails, there just aren't enough celtic warriors in the isles left to repel the germanic tribes. That said, Boudica succeeding in her rebellion and driving out the romans, potentially asserting herself as queen of britain after that point, would probably mean the angles, saxons and jutes never try to invade the isles. They went for britain because it was fractured and weak after Rome exploited them for resources then abandoned them when defending them became too expensive.
what if Shirō Ishii killed the royal family of Japan starting a revolution like the Russian Revolution
I don’t care what they say, Galicia is the 7th Celtic nation! ✊
i knew it was fire of learning the minute i heard his voice
13:40 China: hold my beer
one idea for a scenario could be a second american civil war, happening in the 1900's over McNinley's assassination.
Can you describe this scenario? Why?
@@alishermukhametkali9230 well it would be mainly this, After McKinley's assassination, Anarchist factions would view this as an opportunity to revolt, trying to establish their own state.
In response monopolies and other businesses feeling threatened would set up minature enclaves in major cities like New York and Chicago. Meanwhile wealthy southerners would see this national turmoil and establish a successor state to the CSA. Meanwhile in the U.S. Roosevelt is trying to maintain what is left, and retake the lost territories. Basically the root cause would be if anyone took advantage of the assassination.
REMAKE THIS PLS PAPA Z
What if the Auxmite empire never fell
Based
What if Z had a proper mic?
What if the Weimar Republic survived? Perhaps the Freiwirtschaf concept ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freiwirtschaft ) would come into play?
Do an alternate history video on "What if Mikhael Gorbachev never became leader of the USSR?". This man's rule lead to the fall of the Soviet Union at the time of the 1990's.
I was taken aback I thought Z got a swift kick to the nuts
Well according to a theory, the romans were celts themselves.
GAULS FOREVER!!! also the Gauls weren’t that behind technologically, after all they invented the ancestor of the gladius, scutum, imperial Gallic helm, and chainmail.
P.S. the celtiberians likely didn’t see themselves as the same ethnicity as the Gauls, as they were culturally and genetically influenced by the Iberians. Not only this but their languages were unintelligible, and their religions had grown separate. Most scholars think that they were to first to diverge from other celts
Imagine there would be celtic countries in the continental Europe .That would hsve been so awesome .And those countries would have a lot of gingers .
There appears to be a video in your adverts
The Celts would more likely ally with their cousins the Carthaginians than with Rome
You've done it this time.
when a history channel has more ad rolls than ali a
It'd just as great as today. Being a pagan doesn't mean you don't develop new shit. They have to develop at some point or they wouldn't have advanced iron weapons and the grand battle chariot which was arguably one of their best tactics in a battle. Scared the shit out of the enemy.
0:04 That face tho
lmao i thought mr z had the flu for a second, was about to go find him and give him some cough syrup
The good ending
What if people didn't freak out about nipples in classical paintings?
Thought i clicked on a fire of learning video lmao
Do what if the Punics Survived.
I thought you would just assume what would happen if Vercingetorix won at Alesia.
Everyone asks what are the celts not how are the celts
What if Britain expanded into Europe?
They tried, look up the 100 year war
dang i never seen this NBA game
Celtic Europe: *dab out*
Actual Gaulish language: *ah, yeah*
Look, nice a job as Eluveitie is doing with their Evocation series... some things, one can't help but notice...
4:06 What happens next....
Isn't there evidence that the Celts came to Central Europe from Eastern anitolia and even further east and north from what is now Kazakhstan? That they may have been related to or even were the Scythians? I know in Armenian culture there are what appear to be Celtic Crosses and other traditional Celtic symbolism, that dot the landscape of historic Armenia
@christopher snedeker Right and there is evidence, both cultural and DNA showing that the celtic people can from what is central asia, some moved east while the majority moved west. They can even prove that Mongolians with blond hair have DNA from the Scythians, who also share DNA with the Proto-celts.
SPQG? Shouldn't it be SADC or SAMG?
why is the quality so low
what if Gerald Ford chose Howard Baker as his VP and won a second term and Baker later became president of the US
"They were a people who lived simple lives of farming, religion, and warfare"...come on you're better than this. This is such a narrow-minded perspective. The Celts were in fact just as sophisticated as we are today and any other society in the history of agriculture. They were also a people of art, craftsmanship, trade, oral tradition, and had a unique relationship with their natural environment. it's the 21st century and people like you are still calling them a simple people?! We need to get over ourselves and wake up to the fact that in pre-Roman history, humans were... human.
Celts: Yay we rule Europe!
Germans: Haha lol no
Romans: We rule YOU
*Rome falls*
Celts: Well at least our language and culture is safe on the British Isles!
Anglo-Saxons: Ha ha lol no
Vikings: We rule you!
*Great Britain Forms*
Celts: We still have Ireland
Great Britain: You know how this works
What if the Emus invaded Japan?
What if the Knights of Saint John became an influential colonial power within the Americas?
What if Britain stayed Roman
even tho im germanic i like the idea of a Celtic central Europe
What if Germany backed down from attacking Poland after Danzig or War Ultimatum was rejected.
Basicaly Hitler makes Anshlutz Partisiones Czechoslovakia, but never actualy attacks anyone. From now on he only uses diplomacy.
Would that avert WW2 entirely ? How would Europe funcion with huge Germany with Austia and Czechs within their borders nowadays ?
I guess it could also be called what if Appeasment Strategy Worked for Britan to prevent WW2
a celtic europe would be a europe without rome, odd that the two were pretty closely related, yes so different