I really appreciate the generosity of your sponsor in helping to make this video possible. But really- this is an excellent super duper long term review!
Wow! Thanks for your kind words. I really respect your opinion and appreciate all I've learned from watching your RUclips channel. Here's to the adventure!
I’m looking for a couple of lenses to pair with my X-T4 for a vacation in Vietnam, including a versatile zoom. Do I go XF16-55 (hefty, WR, f/2.8, but no OIS), 18-55mm (lightweight, good OIS, but no WR and could do with the extra width of a 16mm), 16-80mm f/4 (compact, reasonable zoom range but not that bright at the wide end), or this one, the super versatile 18-135? Perhaps a 2 lens kit with the 18-135 and the 16mm f/1.4 for close up, low light and wider shots?
@@Spikesw15 Hi James! This is a great and complicated question. LOL. It's complicated as it depends so much on your personal preferences and specific needs. With the IBIS in X-T4, the lack of OIS in 16-55 becomes less of an issue, but it's still fairly expensive and heavy, and missing a bit of reach on the long end. Personally, my preference is to have as much focal length range as possible, with as few lenses as possible. So, my travel kit is the 10-24 f/4, 16-80 f/4 and 70-300 f/4-5.6. I find I'm ok with f/4 as I'm also ok with ISO 3200 or so for my use. Hope that provides so perspective and food for thought! I hope you have great time in Vietnam, and would love to see your photos. Cheers!
@@Spikesw15 The 18-135 plus the 16 f/1.4 would get my vote. In fact, I traveled with that exact combination on several occasions and had no regrets. I guess it all depends on how much you want to carry around. I was in driving rain on the south island in New Zealand and had my X-T2 and the 18-135 - no water issues whatsoever.
This is one of my favorite FUGI lenses. The other is the 18-55 which is outstanding for video. I don't know why don't receive more recognition. My only complaint on the 18-135 is focus breathing in video as I do a lot of horse training vids. For action stills of horses it is my go to lens.
Hello! Many thanks for watching and sharing your comment. I have not used the 18-135 at all for video, but do know that it's a very much a photo first lens. A lens to consider for your video needs might be the XF 18-120mm, which is designed much more with video in mind. Have fun!
Hi Stacey! Glad you liked the review. I also came from Nikon to Fuji (X-T1 back then) and made sure first lens was the 18-135. Sooooo good! Have fun out there!
Great review man, and your photos are amazing! Having been several times in London, I’ve found your photos from there capable of capturing the colors and the mood of the city. You got a new fan from Switzerland pal!
Thanks for this in-depth review Michael, this has helped me a lot making the right decision. I just bought one, because it seems to be one heck of an allrounder that doesn't break the bank. Awesome photo's in the end by the way. Cheers mate, you just got one extra subscriber, and I wish you all the best from The Netherlands! 👍
Hello! Thanks so much for sharing your comment and so glad you found the video helpful. I hope you enjoy the 18-135! It's such a versatile and practical lens. Best wishes, and welcome to the channel!
I still have a Canon EOS Rebel S with the infamous 18-135 kit zoom, which is why I was skeptical of an expensive 18-135 superzoom for my Fuji cameras. I was so wrong. This lens is a must-have. Even as someone who prefers to shoot with primes, having this zoom as a back-up allows me to go out with confidence, despite a minimalist kit in my bag. Optically, it is stellar. The one annoying characteristic is the zoom ring being unevenly tight across the zoom range.
Hi! I agree about most other super zooms - they’re not nearly as good as the Fujinon 18-135. I have not noticed the variable zoom ring tightness on my lens - sorry it’s that way for you. Thanks fir sharing!
Hi Michael. A great review. I recently purchased a Fuji X-S10 with 18-55mm. Quality outstanding but I am so used to using longer zoom ranges. I used to own a Nikon D7000 with 18-200. After seeing your very honest review I am now going to purchase the 18-135. I just need to sell the 18-55 first. Thank you so much as I have been undecided as to take the leap. Loved your images!
Hi Stuart! Welcome to the Fujifilm family 😀 Once you get used to having that much zoom range, it’s hard to go back! I’m so glad you found this video helpful and greatly appreciate your letting me know. Here’s to a quick sale of the 18-55 and many fun photo adventures with the 18-135!
After researching so many lens options i just purchased this lens. Cant wait for it to arrive! Looks like I made the right decision. Thanks for the great video!!!
I bought this lens to replace my 18-55 kit. Really, anyone new to Fuji should get this over the kit lens, which I found myself to outgrow very quickly. It now stays on the cam by default, unless when I am in low light or tight settings, which I switch to the 16mm 1.4
I've just bought this lens secondhand and once I receive it tomorrow, I'm really looking forward to using it and to reduce the amount of lenses I carry. Thanks for the great review.
Hi Christopher! Yay for new (to you!) lenses. I hope you have so much fun creating photos with the 18-135. Less lenses to carry is such a good thing. Many thanks for your kind words!
Thoroughly enjoyed your video on this lens !.I also subscribed as I' have watched several reviews on the 18-135 & your review was the best , excellent description & explanation & no opening circus tricks .Going on an international trip in 3 weeks & decided that my 16-55 & 70-300 will not be a good long day walk around lens for my X-T4 & my back.Looked at a few used lens, most gut feelings said no. Have my little used X-E4 for sale this weekend, hopefully to help financing this retiree's new lens. One order coming up.
Hi! Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts and plans. I think the 18-135, or even the 16-80 (which is my current daily lens) with the 70-300 would be an excellent travel combo. Have a wonderful trip!
Hi! Many thanks for your kind words :) I think this lens doesn't get a lot of love because it's not "technically" awesome. I love this lens because it's so practical, a great value, and produces images that fit my needs really well. Cheers!
Thank you for this. I appreciated your honesty and frankness. Your sample images were lovely. This lens is on my wish list, as I’m looking for a decent all-rounder, like you mentioned.
I'm so glad you found the review helpful! It's such a great lens - I'm pretty sure you'll have a great time with it :) I'd love to see your photos when you get the lens (you know you'r going to get it now!) Feel free to connect with me on Instagram @msladekphoto. Cheers!
One of the best reviews I’ve seen! I would like to know how well does the autofocus perform ? I’m looking to shoot some sports while also getting to use it during trips
Thanks so much, David! Regarding autofocus - my experience is it better when it’s on the newer bodies. Having said that, none of Fuji’s autofocus systems are great fast-moving sports or other objects. I have X-T3, and for 95% of what I do I have zero complaints with autofocus. It worked superbly for me on my London trip. Best of luck on your sports photos and have an awesome trip!
If I'd just known this lens when a I got my fuji man, I lost in life. Made rookie mistakes. Hope one day I can save up for this lens ! Thanks for taking the time and showing this, excellent review !
Hi Phil! Welcome to the Fujifilm Family!!! Glad you're here... Many thanks for watching the video and glad it was helpful to you. Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers!
I have been looking for a new camera and lens and came across the combination of the X-T2 + 18-135mm, this review pretty much sealed the deal for me :) Thank you very much
That's so wonderful! Congrats and welcome to the Fuji Family :) Many thanks for letting me know that this video was helpful to your decision. Have fun creating photos...
Hey Michael I switched from Nikon to Fuji in 2015. I have this lens and love it. I was pleased that you can use the extension tubes for this lens. I don't want to buy a macro lens for traveling. Thanks for the great review and photos!
Hi Wayne! Thanks for sharing about your experience with this lens. It such a great and versatile lens and lots of fun with extension tubes. Here’s to your Fuji photo adventures!
This was one of my first Fuji lenses. Well my second to be exact, after the 35mm f2, which I bought with my xt1, both of which I still have. I sold this lens, somewhat spontaneously, because I wanted to buy a bunch of vintage primes with distance markings on them. I kinda regret selling it - I think I would appreciate it's versatility so much more now. Perhaps I'll sell some of those vintage primes and buy it again :).
Hi Greg! Thanks for sharing this. Our journey with lenses sometimes twists and turns and brings us back to where we started 😉 Either way, here’s to many great photo adventures!
Excellent review. Bought this lens with my XT-2 and now using it with my XT-3. Very happy with it. Also using it with the extension tubes for macro photography..
Hi Oscar! Thanks for your comments. I'm not sure why, but this lens just works soooooo well with extension tubes at 135mm. Love it! Have fun out there.
Its a really great travel lens. Especially city break etc. So versitile and decent enough quality. If you want better then take 3-4 lenses with and faff around with rain, dust and the risk of dropping them!
...thanks for sharing your experience, just in time...thank you... you made things easier for me to decide to get it and a prime lens 🙂 stay safe too and God bless...
It’s a great all round lens . I sold all my Fuji stuff moved to Olympus looking back on older images from this lens insold my Olympus moved back to Fuji
I was undecided between this lens and the 16-80. I ultimately went with the 16-80 and paired it with the 70-300 and the 23 f2 for travel. I would still like to have this lens. But, I think it’s a little over priced.
Hey man, many, many thanks for this review. I'm going on a vacation soon and I wondered what I could pick to upgrade my15-45 kitlens. As a beginner, many things are lost on me and spending a month salary on something overpowered that I won't get the most out of would've feel like a waste. This lens seems perfect in what I need, and I'll certainly look around the local camera retailers for it.
Hi! Glad the video was helpful. If you're only taking one lens, the 18-135 is a really good choice. For a little less money, and less zoom range, the 16-80 is also a REALLY good lens. Here's the link to my review on that lens - ruclips.net/video/CbUXDbjCdXo/видео.html Have a great vacation!
@@MSladekPhoto Been using it for over a year now and I'm very happy with it! I have some trouble getting good (non-bipod) shots in very low light, but other than that the photographs I've been making are very nice.
Thanks for your kind words! The 18-135mm is just one of those non-sexy, non-cool lenses that go about their life quietly helping me be flexible in my photography. Kind of like my Subaru Crosstrek - it's not going to win any races, but man, it does lots of things really well and conveniently. Let me know when you get the lens again ;)
I bought this lens as a kit lens along with XT1 in 1915 when I switched from Nikon to Fuji and never looked back. Lately, we have been trying to take a minimalist attitude while we travel. While traveling, I carry two lenses - this one and 16mm f/1.4. From XT1, I moved on to XT2, XT3, and now XT4 but this lens stays on the camera all the time. I think this lens never got the proper recognition and thank you so much for featuring this one.
Hi Michael, why did you trade off it for 16-80 then? I think that as only lens this is more useful (80 is short in my opinion as travel lens). IQ is similar, I prefer the (old style rendering) of 18-135
Hi! Great question 😎 I went with the 16-80mm because I got the 70-30mm. So, now I have lots more reach than 18-135 with these two lenses. The 16-80 is on my camera most of the time, with the 70-300 for those hard to reach places. Next week’s video is a long-term review of 70-300, and I used the 16-80 for thumbnail photos. They look great! Really happy with this combination. Cheers!
Great video! Thank you! Have the lens, but don't use it as much, because mostly shooting at night, so going for fast lenses. Waiting for opportunity to use 18-135 more. o:
Thanks for your kind words. Makes sense that you don't use the 18-135 much at night - it does need a bit of light (or long exposures and tripods) to shine. Cheers!
Hello! I do not have the X-T5, so I have no experience with how the 18-135 performs on Fuji’s new 40MP sensor. Also, I’m not sure if anyone has posted thoughts on this lens with that sensor yet. I’ve printed images from this lens at around 36”x24” and they looked great coming from the 24mp X-T2. Hope that helps!
Hi! That's one thing I have NOT used the 18-135mm for - video. Not sure why that is... I see no reason it wouldn't perform well as a video lens. May have to give it a try to see how it does... Great question!
When I was working for a newspaper, I used a Nikkor 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 with a Nikon d2H when I traveled. Like you, I found the lens to be a great value for my type of shooting which is mainly documentary/street. I now am shooting the Fuji X-Pro2 with the XF 335mm f2 WR for a weather resistant package. But I am considering this lens because I miss my Nikkor superzoom that, like this lens, for its versatility. Thanks for the review. One question: you say there is an aperture ring on this lens. Where is it? All of the images I see do NOT show an aperture ring (which is the one issue I have with the lens).
Hi Richard! Thanks for sharing a bit of your history. It’s pretty amazing the image quality of modern zoom lenses, and I’m so grateful for the 18-135 and it’s versatility. Regarding aperture ring - it’s there(!) near the rear of the lens, it’s just not labeled with any aperture markings, so easy to visually miss. Best wishes on your photography adventures!
Great video! I got my first Fuji ever 3 days ago, xs10 with 16-80 and considered of getting the 55-200 as an additional lens. Now after watching this, I may change my mind and just go for this one as my only (travel) lens... cheers
Welcome to the Fuji family! The nice thing is, if you go with 16-80 + 55-200 (or 70-300??? - that’s such a great lens) or the 18-135, you’ll have really high quality images that will help you create the images you want! Have fun with your camera 📸
Hi! It is a difficult choice! Here’s what I try to remember: 1) All Fuji zoom lenses are good. 2) No lenses are perfect 3) You can always change your mind. Think of the physical characteristics that are important (size, weight), features (image stabilization, weather sealing) and price. Hope that helps. Cheers on your choice!
18mm -135 f 3.5 is my firat love lens, then 35mm f1.4 then I got 10 -24 , then now i got 50mm f1.0 so beautiful but soooooooo heavy, i need more muscle
Hi. I'm new on your channel but I glad to find you. You have both lenses that are in my interest: 16-80 and 18-135. I would like to buy 18-135 but I have three questions regarding this lens: (1) does it creeps down? I'm using a peak-design clip on my backpack so the lens would be mostly down-forward (2) does this lens has some toughness between 110-135 reach a different force needs to be use to change the focus rang in that limit? (3) does focus ring goes 360 degree or it has limit from wide to telephoto reach but just do not have aperture markings? Thank you in advance for your answers
Hello and welcome! Answers: 1) my copy did not have lens creep. If you buy used, it might. 2) my version was smooth throughout the zoom range 3) focus ring is 360 degree. I never use manual focus on Fujifilm lenses, though 😉 Hope that helps!
Hi! Thank you for your kind words and taking the time to share your comment. Yes, I think this lens would work well with the XE-3. It’s going to be a bit larger and heavier than the 18-55, so just be aware of that. Also, the 16-80 would work well with that camera, so you have a couple of really good choices! Cheers!
Hello! Welcome to your new camera. I hope you have lots of fun creating photos. Yes, I think the 18-135mm is still a very good lens option and will work nicely with the X-S20. Another option, and the one I’m using the most, is the XF 16-80mm f4. Hope that helps!
Hello Michael, I have a pretty specific question and I hope you can help. I noticed that the 18-135 performs very well up to distances of 200/300 meters. But when I take pictures of subjects like buildings or landscapes which are farther away like a kilometer or a mile the 18-135 delivers pretty mushy results (compared) compared to my Olympus 12-100 Pro. I just bought the 18-135 because I want to sell my Olympus gear (I shoot Fuji professionally and I can't afford two systems anymore) and went for a couple of hikes to get some test shots. And I was surprised how sharp the 18-135 is at relatively close distances but as soon as I go long distance the picture gets mushy and the famous Fuji watercolor effect gets very pronounced (both using lightroom and Fuji's own raw converter). Have you made similar experiences or do you have any advice? Thanks in advance! Keep up the great work!
Hi Andreas! This is a very interesting question. I have no specific instances where I have noticed subjects is far distance that appear mushy, as you suggest. Having said that, let me take a look through my photos again of long distance subjects with 18-135 with a more critical eye. I have read several stories online of folks whose 18-135 has various quality issues. Could be a bad sample or maybe I’m just not as critical of sharpness, etc… as some are. Stay tuned for an update. Also, welcome to the Fuji Family!
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks in advance. I still have the Olympus setup so I'm going to take both kits for a photo walk in the coming days. It probably won't affect my decision but know I want to have a side by side comparison with the same subjects and the same amount of atmosphere between me and whatever I'm going to photograph...
@@andreasschroder7880 That makes lots of sense. I’d be interested to see what you find out. I did a quick look at some images, and I don’t have many with long distance subjects, so haven’t been able to see how my lens performs. Cheers!
@@MSladekPhoto I wish I hadn't done that. Even in the center (I chose the subjects in away that I was able to focus in the center) the 12-100 on the 20MP M43 sensor is noticeably sharper than the 18-135. The closer you get to the corners the bigger the difference becomes. I did the comparison with four subjects. I took three shots (refocused every time) wide open and three shoots stopped down one stop. I only compared the sharpest of the three images. The 12-100 wins every time. When you compare the wide open shot of the 12-100 with the stopped down shot of the 18-135 it's a draw in the center but move away from the center only a little and the 12-100 is clearly in the lead again...
Hi Michael, I am planning on buying a used X-T2 and building a kit around it, hopefully 2 zooms and one prime. My style of shooting is more urban and street and some landscapes while hiking. I love long range zooms and hence always carry a sony rx100 (1" sensor) with a 24-200 equivalent. For the x-T2, I was first planning on getting the 16-80 and the 70-300 (along with a 1.4x TC). But after watching this review, I'm considering the 18-135 (which is equal in zoom range to my small rx100) because like you, I don't like changing lenses. So my question is, what should my 2nd telephoto zoom be, if I go with 18-135 as main lens? 70-300 overlaps by 65mm! The 100-400 is an obvious choice but it can be pretty heavy while hiking. Any ideas? Thank you!
Hi! Welcome to the Fujifilm family!!! Lately, I’ve been using the 16-80 and 70-300 when using 2 lenses. I haven’t retired the 18-135, but if I think I’ll need that extra zoom reach, I’ll use the 16-80 to be just a little wider and have 1 stop faster aperture as well. If you do shoot a lot with just one lens, the 18-135 would be the way to go to add with 70-300. Even though it has some overlap with 70-300, I’m usually at at least 200mm when using the 70-300… Nice to have all these great options!
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks for the reply; I agree with your suggestion. Since I tend to reach 200 mm on my rx100 quite often, getting the one all-in-one lens like a 18-135mm feels prudent. I cannot afford both the 16-80 and 18-135. And 70-300 with TC...also prudent! I've a few questions though: 1) Does the 18-135 lens creep when not in use, hanging by your side lens facing down? Asking because I intend to use the peak design capture clip. 2) Can you do a comparison of 1.4x TC vs 2.0x TC; if you have both of them. The fine balance between image sharpness and the trade off for extra reach debate. 3) SD card: Have heard the angry photographer and several others strongly suggest not to use Lexar. I tend to shoot continuous but only 3 to 4 frames at a time, so as to not miss the moment. No sports or wildlife etc. Would a SanDisk Extreme Pro suffice for my needs? Also, the fuji lens roadmap shows a 18-120 (no aperture mentioned) coming in 2022...it looks quite big though. And hope you can get your hands on the new tamron 18-300 for x mount. The sony version has got some great reviews.
Hi Shervin! Thanks for your comment. Short version - the 50-140 is better image quality in my experience. But, heavier and not as "fun." So, I use the 50-140 for paying assignments and the 18-135 for personal and more casual photos. Here's my video review of the 50-140 ruclips.net/video/8A2EUG9vOiI/видео.html
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks! I just received your reply while I was comparing both lenses in a camera shop, and it's exactly as you told me. I could tell that the 50-140 had a better image quality, even on the small screen. I do want to create that 'special' look, so I went with the 50-140.
I've got a question, is it only my lens issue or maybe it's common to 18-135: front element "drops out" (like if you do zoom-in to 135) while I'm walking with lens attached to camera on my neck and I have to zoom out it back.. Have you also faced it?
Hi Artur! Thanks for watching and this is a great question. My copy of the 18-135 does not have the “lens creep” you mention. I think that is something that could happen as the lens gets older or it might carry from lens to lens. Having said that, I have not seen anyone else mention that as an issue with this lens… Hope that helps a little!
@@MSladekPhoto Thank you, I've bought used one it was quite in good condition on photo but seems like though good exterior it was in heavy use (there is even several dust dots inside of lens block).
Hi. Thanks for a great review, it' really boosts my confidence for considering this lens. Still, I notice in the description that you also own the 16-80mm f/4. I'm a Fujiilm beginner and I'm looking for an all-in-one lens for travelling, I do a lot of trekking/hiking when travelling and I'm a small guy so bringing multiple lens is not an option (I learned it from experience with a Nikon with just only 2 lenses). My question is, after reading countless reviews, many people prefer the 16-80mm f/4 over this 18-135mm lens and I wonder why. Could you share some insights from your experience with these two? I have used the Nikon 18-70mm and I know 70mm or 80mm would probably not enough for me but all the love for the Fujifilm 16-80mm f/4 gets me a bit confused. Thanks and best regards.
Hi! Thanks for your comments and questions. The short answer is that while I do have the 16-80mm, I haven't used it very much as it was on my wife's camera. Until she dropped the lens and now it awaits repair or replacement. If I only had one lens, I would still go with the 18-135. I like the extra reach on the telephoto end - but that's my "style." The 16-80 gets you one stop more light at constant f/4, so that's nice. The 16-80 weighs 440g, while the 18-135 weighs 490g - not a huge weight difference, but noticeable. I think any visual quality difference between the 16-80 and 18-135 is also pretty small, and probably not noticeable for most people. I always remind myself when faced with these difficult choices - "There are no perfect lenses. There are no terrible lenses. Choose one, and go create photos!" And then, I usually watch another 10 review videos - haha. Good luck with this tough decisions and happy hiking and photo making!
@@MSladekPhoto Thank you for your super prompt response. Your answer sounds very reasonable. I guess I'll buy the 18-135mm anyway for that 55mm extra zoom. Btw, do you have any comments on the low light performance out in the nature of this lens, let's say bonfire atmosphere and such context?
Hi again! In my experience, the 18-135 focuses well in low light when paired with the X-T3 or cameras with same processor that perform better in low light. The image stabilization works very well in my experience, and I can get away with 1/60 most of the time, and I don't mind using higher ISO's (3200-6400) on the X-T3. Hope that helps!
@@MSladekPhoto Wow. That helps a lot. I've got the X-S10 which is said to share the same processor with the X-T4, so I guess it will work well. Thanks to you I have finally come to a decision!
Hi Jakob! I'm glad you found the review helpful. I like black & white at times because the photo then becomes different (we see in color), and adds an element of timelessness as colors tend to be associated with certain time periods. Cheers!
@@jakoberiksen2944 Hi again! Getting blurry backgrounds is... complicated. Obviously, the easiest way is with a fast lens (aperture 2.8 or wider), however you can also get blurry backgrounds with "slower" lenses such as 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6. Here's how - remember that depth of field is affected by not only aperture, but focal length (more telephoto = LESS depth of field), subject distance to lens (closer to lens = less depth of field) and subject distance to background (more distance from background = less depth of field.) So, with the 18-135 if I want blurry background, I zoom to about 135mm, use f/5.6, get relatively close to my subject, and keep my subject some distance (at least a few meters) from the background. Hope that helps!
@@MSladekPhotothank you! I ended up getting it and really like it so far. There is one thing I wonder if you can help me with though. I am still new to my camera/photography, but I don’t understand how to change my aperture with this lens. Unlike the prime lens I have it doesn’t have the ring, so from what I read I should be able to use the front dial to change the aperture. I made sure the lens is not switched to Auto, my camera mode is aperture priority, my front dial is configured correctly in settings, and the f stop is showing in blue on my screen which, according to what I read, means I should be able to manipulate it myself. However when I turn or press the dial it does not change. Any idea what I am doing wrong? 😢 Thanks for your time
@@elle96425 Hi again! The 18-135 does have have an aperture ring. It's the ring closes to the camera body. Note: it does not have aperture numbers, as this is a variable aperture lens. So, the aperture ring should work to change aperture value! Hope that helps :)
@@MSladekPhotothank you SO much. I feel silly for not realizing that now lol but “variable aperture lens” was a new term for me haha I purchased the camera used with a prime 35mm so wasn’t used to that. Really appreciate you taking the time to respond, I live in a rural area and haven’t been able to find photography classes or anyone to really mentor me yet so I can’t stress how valuable your vids/comments are to me. Thanks again!
Hi Davi! Nope. This lens was released in 2014. I've had it since then ;) Even DPReview agrees - www.dpreview.com/articles/3659416761/fujifilm-launches-weather-resistant-xf-18-135mm-f3-5-5-6-r-lm-ois-wr - check the article date - June 16, 2014.
@@DragonEye1911 Wow! Small world. I hated the lock because it would forget it was on and then had to take off to zoom. Sometimes missed the shot. I like what Fuji does with the 70-300 - when locked, you can unlock with a little extra twist pressure to zoom. Works really well. Cheers!
13:40 - it's pathetic, when somebody says what how do I have to do a street photo - doing it in a wrong way by himself. LOL, man, you mustn't do a street photography with such a long focal distance (13:42)! BTW - photograhing people looking at their phones is a very bad, boring way to do a street photo.
Hello! Thanks for watching and sharing your comment. It seems that we have differences of opinion about what makes a photo boring or interesting, and that's one of the cool things about sharing art - you get to learn what other people like and don't. I wish you the best in your photo adventures!
Nice review....Until you made this "COVID stuff" statement 😩 Please stay with the camera stuff you obviously have expertise in. Don't spread political propaganda, please.
I have a good friend who had Covid and was in the hospital for a month and still has lingering effects. So, it’s not propaganda to me. Just as you have the freedom to share your opinion in your comment, I have the freedom to share non-photography thoughts on my channel. Stay well!
I've been eyeing this lens for a long time! I had the Sony equivalent for a while and it was super soft on the long end. I picked up a 100-400 yesterday that I'm pretty stoked about!
I really appreciate the generosity of your sponsor in helping to make this video possible.
But really- this is an excellent super duper long term review!
Wow! Thanks for your kind words. I really respect your opinion and appreciate all I've learned from watching your RUclips channel. Here's to the adventure!
Great video. I've also had my XF 18-135 for quite a few years and it's always in my bag when I go on vacation. A truly under appreciated lens.
Hi Steve! Many thanks for sharing your kind words. Some of my favorite photos were taken with the 18-135… So glad you’re enjoying it. Take care!
I’m looking for a couple of lenses to pair with my X-T4 for a vacation in Vietnam, including a versatile zoom. Do I go XF16-55 (hefty, WR, f/2.8, but no OIS), 18-55mm (lightweight, good OIS, but no WR and could do with the extra width of a 16mm), 16-80mm f/4 (compact, reasonable zoom range but not that bright at the wide end), or this one, the super versatile 18-135? Perhaps a 2 lens kit with the 18-135 and the 16mm f/1.4 for close up, low light and wider shots?
@@Spikesw15 Hi James! This is a great and complicated question. LOL. It's complicated as it depends so much on your personal preferences and specific needs. With the IBIS in X-T4, the lack of OIS in 16-55 becomes less of an issue, but it's still fairly expensive and heavy, and missing a bit of reach on the long end. Personally, my preference is to have as much focal length range as possible, with as few lenses as possible. So, my travel kit is the 10-24 f/4, 16-80 f/4 and 70-300 f/4-5.6. I find I'm ok with f/4 as I'm also ok with ISO 3200 or so for my use. Hope that provides so perspective and food for thought! I hope you have great time in Vietnam, and would love to see your photos. Cheers!
@@Spikesw15 The 18-135 plus the 16 f/1.4 would get my vote. In fact, I traveled with that exact combination on several occasions and had no regrets. I guess it all depends on how much you want to carry around. I was in driving rain on the south island in New Zealand and had my X-T2 and the 18-135 - no water issues whatsoever.
This is one of my favorite FUGI lenses. The other is the 18-55 which is outstanding for video. I don't know why don't receive more recognition. My only complaint on the 18-135 is focus breathing in video as I do a lot of horse training vids. For action stills of horses it is my go to lens.
Hello! Many thanks for watching and sharing your comment. I have not used the 18-135 at all for video, but do know that it's a very much a photo first lens. A lens to consider for your video needs might be the XF 18-120mm, which is designed much more with video in mind. Have fun!
I traded in all my Nikon gear for an X-T4 and this lens. I love the 18-135! Great review! Thanks!
Hi Stacey! Glad you liked the review. I also came from Nikon to Fuji (X-T1 back then) and made sure first lens was the 18-135. Sooooo good! Have fun out there!
Great review man, and your photos are amazing! Having been several times in London, I’ve found your photos from there capable of capturing the colors and the mood of the city.
You got a new fan from Switzerland pal!
Hi Alessandro! Always glad to make new friends, especially from places I hope to travel someday. Many, many thanks for your kind words. Cheers!
Thanks for this in-depth review Michael, this has helped me a lot making the right decision. I just bought one, because it seems to be one heck of an allrounder that doesn't break the bank. Awesome photo's in the end by the way. Cheers mate, you just got one extra subscriber, and I wish you all the best from The Netherlands! 👍
Hello! Thanks so much for sharing your comment and so glad you found the video helpful. I hope you enjoy the 18-135! It's such a versatile and practical lens. Best wishes, and welcome to the channel!
Hi Michael. Yes, I now own a 18-135. I sold the 18-55 and am now thrilled with this lens.
Hi Stuart! Thanks for the update. I hope you have many photo adventures with the 18-135mm. Cheers!
I still have a Canon EOS Rebel S with the infamous 18-135 kit zoom, which is why I was skeptical of an expensive 18-135 superzoom for my Fuji cameras. I was so wrong. This lens is a must-have. Even as someone who prefers to shoot with primes, having this zoom as a back-up allows me to go out with confidence, despite a minimalist kit in my bag. Optically, it is stellar. The one annoying characteristic is the zoom ring being unevenly tight across the zoom range.
Hi! I agree about most other super zooms - they’re not nearly as good as the Fujinon 18-135. I have not noticed the variable zoom ring tightness on my lens - sorry it’s that way for you. Thanks fir sharing!
Hi Michael. A great review. I recently purchased a Fuji X-S10 with 18-55mm. Quality outstanding but I am so used to using longer zoom ranges. I used to own a Nikon D7000 with 18-200. After seeing your very honest review I am now going to purchase the 18-135. I just need to sell the 18-55 first. Thank you so much as I have been undecided as to take the leap. Loved your images!
Hi Stuart! Welcome to the Fujifilm family 😀 Once you get used to having that much zoom range, it’s hard to go back! I’m so glad you found this video helpful and greatly appreciate your letting me know. Here’s to a quick sale of the 18-55 and many fun photo adventures with the 18-135!
After researching so many lens options i just purchased this lens. Cant wait for it to arrive! Looks like I made the right decision. Thanks for the great video!!!
Hi! I'm really glad you found this video helpful, and hope you have as much fun with the 18-135mm as I've had through the year. Enjoy!
I bought this lens to replace my 18-55 kit. Really, anyone new to Fuji should get this over the kit lens, which I found myself to outgrow very quickly. It now stays on the cam by default, unless when I am in low light or tight settings, which I switch to the 16mm 1.4
I agree about the 18-135 over the 18-55 - the versatility and value, along with image quality is pretty hard to beat.
I've just bought this lens secondhand and once I receive it tomorrow, I'm really looking forward to using it and to reduce the amount of lenses I carry. Thanks for the great review.
Hi Christopher! Yay for new (to you!) lenses. I hope you have so much fun creating photos with the 18-135. Less lenses to carry is such a good thing. Many thanks for your kind words!
Thoroughly enjoyed your video on this lens !.I also subscribed as I' have watched several reviews on the 18-135 & your review was the best , excellent description & explanation & no opening circus tricks .Going on an international trip in 3 weeks & decided that my 16-55 & 70-300 will not be a good long day walk around lens for my X-T4 & my back.Looked at a few used lens, most gut feelings said no. Have my little used X-E4 for sale this weekend, hopefully to help financing this retiree's new lens. One order coming up.
Hi! Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts and plans. I think the 18-135, or even the 16-80 (which is my current daily lens) with the 70-300 would be an excellent travel combo. Have a wonderful trip!
Really nice captures! I gotta say my opinion of this lens really grew. I've only heard how it's not sharp enough from other people.
Hi! Many thanks for your kind words :) I think this lens doesn't get a lot of love because it's not "technically" awesome. I love this lens because it's so practical, a great value, and produces images that fit my needs really well. Cheers!
@@MSladekPhoto Can't argue with that! Extremely handy to have basically any possible focal length you could want in 99% of the cases in one lens.
Exactly!!!
Thank you for this. I appreciated your honesty and frankness. Your sample images were lovely. This lens is on my wish list, as I’m looking for a decent all-rounder, like you mentioned.
Hi! I'm so glad you found the review helpful. I hope you're able to try this lens yourself soon and enjoy creating photos with it. Happy Holidays!
Great review!! I'm thinking about getting this lens sometime down the road and this was very helpful.
I'm so glad you found the review helpful! It's such a great lens - I'm pretty sure you'll have a great time with it :) I'd love to see your photos when you get the lens (you know you'r going to get it now!) Feel free to connect with me on Instagram @msladekphoto. Cheers!
One of the best reviews I’ve seen!
I would like to know how well does the autofocus perform ? I’m looking to shoot some sports while also getting to use it during trips
Thanks so much, David! Regarding autofocus - my experience is it better when it’s on the newer bodies. Having said that, none of Fuji’s autofocus systems are great fast-moving sports or other objects. I have X-T3, and for 95% of what I do I have zero complaints with autofocus. It worked superbly for me on my London trip. Best of luck on your sports photos and have an awesome trip!
If I'd just known this lens when a I got my fuji man, I lost in life. Made rookie mistakes. Hope one day I can save up for this lens ! Thanks for taking the time and showing this, excellent review !
Hi! Thanks for your kind words and for taking the time share this comment. We’ve all add regrets on equipment purchases! Have fun creating photos…
Your video and review of this lens will confirm my choice, best regards.
Hi! Thanks for watching and I'm so glad you found the video helpful. Here's to lots of photo adventures with the 18-135mm!
I'm sold - thank you for the review!
Hi James! So glad you liked the video. I hope you enjoy your new lens :)
Many thanks, I am new to FF and have a body and no lenses so a really useful post for me.
Hi Phil! Welcome to the Fujifilm Family!!! Glad you're here... Many thanks for watching the video and glad it was helpful to you. Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers!
I have been looking for a new camera and lens and came across the combination of the X-T2 + 18-135mm, this review pretty much sealed the deal for me :) Thank you very much
That's so wonderful! Congrats and welcome to the Fuji Family :) Many thanks for letting me know that this video was helpful to your decision. Have fun creating photos...
Hey Michael
I switched from Nikon to Fuji in 2015. I have this lens and love it. I was pleased that you can use the extension tubes for this lens. I don't want to buy a macro lens for traveling.
Thanks for the great review and photos!
Hi Wayne! Thanks for sharing about your experience with this lens. It such a great and versatile lens and lots of fun with extension tubes. Here’s to your Fuji photo adventures!
I was about to sell mine but having watched your excellent review I'll keep it a little longer. Cheers!
It's such a versatile lens! I hope you have lots more photos together 😎
This was one of my first Fuji lenses. Well my second to be exact, after the 35mm f2, which I bought with my xt1, both of which I still have. I sold this lens, somewhat spontaneously, because I wanted to buy a bunch of vintage primes with distance markings on them. I kinda regret selling it - I think I would appreciate it's versatility so much more now. Perhaps I'll sell some of those vintage primes and buy it again :).
Hi Greg! Thanks for sharing this. Our journey with lenses sometimes twists and turns and brings us back to where we started 😉 Either way, here’s to many great photo adventures!
Excellent review. Bought this lens with my XT-2 and now using it with my XT-3. Very happy with it. Also using it with the extension tubes for macro photography..
Hi Oscar! Thanks for your comments. I'm not sure why, but this lens just works soooooo well with extension tubes at 135mm. Love it! Have fun out there.
Will you please write more about that macro tubes
Its a really great travel lens. Especially city break etc. So versitile and decent enough quality. If you want better then take 3-4 lenses with and faff around with rain, dust and the risk of dropping them!
Agreed!
...thanks for sharing your experience, just in time...thank you... you made things easier for me to decide to get it and a prime lens 🙂 stay safe too and God bless...
Hi Eselyn! I’m so glad the video was helpful. Have fun with your new lenses!!!
It’s a great all round lens . I sold all my Fuji stuff moved to Olympus looking back on older images from this lens insold my Olympus moved back to Fuji
Hi! Welcome back to the Fuji family - we're glad you rejoined us ;) Cheers!
I was undecided between this lens and the 16-80. I ultimately went with the 16-80 and paired it with the 70-300 and the 23 f2 for travel. I would still like to have this lens. But, I think it’s a little over priced.
Hi! Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’m also using the 16-80 and 70-300 most of the time. It’s a really versatile combo. Cheers!
Forgot you are a Bellevue boy. I'm a Mill Creek man. Love your stuff!!! Of course I've subscribed.
Hi Dennis! Thanks for joining the journey. Hope you enjoy!
Hey man, many, many thanks for this review. I'm going on a vacation soon and I wondered what I could pick to upgrade my15-45 kitlens. As a beginner, many things are lost on me and spending a month salary on something overpowered that I won't get the most out of would've feel like a waste. This lens seems perfect in what I need, and I'll certainly look around the local camera retailers for it.
Hi! Glad the video was helpful. If you're only taking one lens, the 18-135 is a really good choice. For a little less money, and less zoom range, the 16-80 is also a REALLY good lens. Here's the link to my review on that lens - ruclips.net/video/CbUXDbjCdXo/видео.html Have a great vacation!
@@MSladekPhoto In my local store the 16-80mm is actually 315 USD more expensive than the 18-135....
@@BjarteKFrnsdal Wow! That’s a huge difference and a surprise. Sorry about that!
@@MSladekPhoto So am I.... 😉😊😂
@@MSladekPhoto Been using it for over a year now and I'm very happy with it! I have some trouble getting good (non-bipod) shots in very low light, but other than that the photographs I've been making are very nice.
Quite impressive that you can read the name without fail
Haha! Lots of practice. May have been reading it, too.
Great review. I had the lens but was foolish enough to part with it. I’m seriously thinking about acquiring another copy.
Thanks for your kind words! The 18-135mm is just one of those non-sexy, non-cool lenses that go about their life quietly helping me be flexible in my photography. Kind of like my Subaru Crosstrek - it's not going to win any races, but man, it does lots of things really well and conveniently. Let me know when you get the lens again ;)
Thanks for this helpful video.
Hi Johann! I am so glad you found the video helpful. Best wishes on your photography adventures!
I bought this lens as a kit lens along with XT1 in 1915 when I switched from Nikon to Fuji and never looked back. Lately, we have been trying to take a minimalist attitude while we travel. While traveling, I carry two lenses - this one and 16mm f/1.4. From XT1, I moved on to XT2, XT3, and now XT4 but this lens stays on the camera all the time. I think this lens never got the proper recognition and thank you so much for featuring this one.
I agree. I imagine this lens will last me at least until the X-T9 😉
Oh shit. I have the EXACT same lens combo as you!!
Ah cool, the combo I was planning on getting
Hi Michael, why did you trade off it for 16-80 then? I think that as only lens this is more useful (80 is short in my opinion as travel lens). IQ is similar, I prefer the (old style rendering) of 18-135
Hi! Great question 😎 I went with the 16-80mm because I got the 70-30mm. So, now I have lots more reach than 18-135 with these two lenses. The 16-80 is on my camera most of the time, with the 70-300 for those hard to reach places. Next week’s video is a long-term review of 70-300, and I used the 16-80 for thumbnail photos. They look great! Really happy with this combination. Cheers!
Great video! Thank you!
Have the lens, but don't use it as much, because mostly shooting at night, so going for fast lenses. Waiting for opportunity to use 18-135 more. o:
Thanks for your kind words. Makes sense that you don't use the 18-135 much at night - it does need a bit of light (or long exposures and tripods) to shine. Cheers!
Nice pics mate :)
Hi Cambell! Many thanks for your kind words :) Best wishes on your photography adventures!
what's the performance on the new X-T5 with 40 Mp sensor? Did somebody test this already? Many thanks
Hello! I do not have the X-T5, so I have no experience with how the 18-135 performs on Fuji’s new 40MP sensor. Also, I’m not sure if anyone has posted thoughts on this lens with that sensor yet. I’ve printed images from this lens at around 36”x24” and they looked great coming from the 24mp X-T2. Hope that helps!
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks, but i'm not sure about the sharpness near the corners. Great vids by the way! Best wishes!
reading comment section to help me decide that i need this lens
Between the 18-135mm and 16-80mm f/4, you have great options for a general purpose lens with great image quality. Glad to answer any questions!
@@MSladekPhoto i bought the 18-135mm yesterday :) as of now i am satisfied
@SAEGR8 Yay! I hope you enjoy your new lens.
Hi Michael, really helpful video! In your opinion, does this lens work well for video also?
Hi! That's one thing I have NOT used the 18-135mm for - video. Not sure why that is... I see no reason it wouldn't perform well as a video lens. May have to give it a try to see how it does... Great question!
When I was working for a newspaper, I used a Nikkor 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 with a Nikon d2H when I traveled. Like you, I found the lens to be a great value for my type of shooting which is mainly documentary/street. I now am shooting the Fuji X-Pro2 with the XF 335mm f2 WR for a weather resistant package. But I am considering this lens because I miss my Nikkor superzoom that, like this lens, for its versatility. Thanks for the review.
One question: you say there is an aperture ring on this lens. Where is it? All of the images I see do NOT show an aperture ring (which is the one issue I have with the lens).
Hi Richard! Thanks for sharing a bit of your history. It’s pretty amazing the image quality of modern zoom lenses, and I’m so grateful for the 18-135 and it’s versatility. Regarding aperture ring - it’s there(!) near the rear of the lens, it’s just not labeled with any aperture markings, so easy to visually miss. Best wishes on your photography adventures!
Great video! I got my first Fuji ever 3 days ago, xs10 with 16-80 and considered of getting the 55-200 as an additional lens. Now after watching this, I may change my mind and just go for this one as my only (travel) lens... cheers
Welcome to the Fuji family! The nice thing is, if you go with 16-80 + 55-200 (or 70-300??? - that’s such a great lens) or the 18-135, you’ll have really high quality images that will help you create the images you want! Have fun with your camera 📸
I got my X-S10 few months back and still am debating what zoom lens I should invest in 🤔
Hi! It is a difficult choice! Here’s what I try to remember: 1) All Fuji zoom lenses are good. 2) No lenses are perfect 3) You can always change your mind. Think of the physical characteristics that are important (size, weight), features (image stabilization, weather sealing) and price. Hope that helps. Cheers on your choice!
18mm -135 f 3.5 is my firat love lens, then 35mm f1.4 then I got 10 -24 , then now i got 50mm f1.0 so beautiful but soooooooo heavy, i need more muscle
Hi Teddy! Yep, that 18-135 is such a great lens to do so much with. The 50mm f/1.0 is indeed HUGE and HEAVY! Here's to your muscle-building program ;)
Hi.
I'm new on your channel but I glad to find you.
You have both lenses that are in my interest: 16-80 and 18-135.
I would like to buy 18-135 but I have three questions regarding this lens:
(1) does it creeps down? I'm using a peak-design clip on my backpack so the lens would be mostly down-forward
(2) does this lens has some toughness between 110-135 reach a different force needs to be use to change the focus rang in that limit?
(3) does focus ring goes 360 degree or it has limit from wide to telephoto reach but just do not have aperture markings?
Thank you in advance for your answers
Hello and welcome! Answers: 1) my copy did not have lens creep. If you buy used, it might. 2) my version was smooth throughout the zoom range 3) focus ring is 360 degree. I never use manual focus on Fujifilm lenses, though 😉 Hope that helps!
@@MSladekPhoto Thank you for your quick response. In pt. 3 I was thinking about aperture ring not focus ring. I apologize for my mistake 🙂
Hi, great review! I'm considering this lens as a replacement for the kit lens I got with my EX-3. Would this be a all-round good lens for my camera?
Hi! Thank you for your kind words and taking the time to share your comment. Yes, I think this lens would work well with the XE-3. It’s going to be a bit larger and heavier than the 18-55, so just be aware of that. Also, the 16-80 would work well with that camera, so you have a couple of really good choices! Cheers!
Hei i'm still new in this camera area. Will this a great all arounder and suits with my fujifilm XS20?
Hello! Welcome to your new camera. I hope you have lots of fun creating photos. Yes, I think the 18-135mm is still a very good lens option and will work nicely with the X-S20. Another option, and the one I’m using the most, is the XF 16-80mm f4. Hope that helps!
Great video 👍
Thank you so much! I'm so glad you found the video helpful. Are you thinking of getting the 18-135?
@@MSladekPhoto no, i have Him 👍
I've got loads of fuji lenses but will get this for travel. 🙃
Fun! I hope you enjoy it as much as I have 😎
Hello Michael, I have a pretty specific question and I hope you can help. I noticed that the 18-135 performs very well up to distances of 200/300 meters. But when I take pictures of subjects like buildings or landscapes which are farther away like a kilometer or a mile the 18-135 delivers pretty mushy results (compared) compared to my Olympus 12-100 Pro. I just bought the 18-135 because I want to sell my Olympus gear (I shoot Fuji professionally and I can't afford two systems anymore) and went for a couple of hikes to get some test shots. And I was surprised how sharp the 18-135 is at relatively close distances but as soon as I go long distance the picture gets mushy and the famous Fuji watercolor effect gets very pronounced (both using lightroom and Fuji's own raw converter). Have you made similar experiences or do you have any advice? Thanks in advance! Keep up the great work!
Hi Andreas! This is a very interesting question. I have no specific instances where I have noticed subjects is far distance that appear mushy, as you suggest. Having said that, let me take a look through my photos again of long distance subjects with 18-135 with a more critical eye. I have read several stories online of folks whose 18-135 has various quality issues. Could be a bad sample or maybe I’m just not as critical of sharpness, etc… as some are. Stay tuned for an update. Also, welcome to the Fuji Family!
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks in advance. I still have the Olympus setup so I'm going to take both kits for a photo walk in the coming days. It probably won't affect my decision but know I want to have a side by side comparison with the same subjects and the same amount of atmosphere between me and whatever I'm going to photograph...
@@andreasschroder7880 That makes lots of sense. I’d be interested to see what you find out. I did a quick look at some images, and I don’t have many with long distance subjects, so haven’t been able to see how my lens performs. Cheers!
@@MSladekPhoto I wish I hadn't done that. Even in the center (I chose the subjects in away that I was able to focus in the center) the 12-100 on the 20MP M43 sensor is noticeably sharper than the 18-135. The closer you get to the corners the bigger the difference becomes. I did the comparison with four subjects. I took three shots (refocused every time) wide open and three shoots stopped down one stop. I only compared the sharpest of the three images. The 12-100 wins every time. When you compare the wide open shot of the 12-100 with the stopped down shot of the 18-135 it's a draw in the center but move away from the center only a little and the 12-100 is clearly in the lead again...
@@MSladekPhoto If you are interested you can get the raw files via Wetransfer.
Would you consider it for professional work? Not weddings or portraits, but professional stock landscapes and/or still life?
Hi! Yes, I've used this lens for product photos as well as some stock photography. Thanks for watching and asking this question. Cheers!
Hi Michael, I am planning on buying a used X-T2 and building a kit around it, hopefully 2 zooms and one prime. My style of shooting is more urban and street and some landscapes while hiking. I love long range zooms and hence always carry a sony rx100 (1" sensor) with a 24-200 equivalent.
For the x-T2, I was first planning on getting the 16-80 and the 70-300 (along with a 1.4x TC). But after watching this review, I'm considering the 18-135 (which is equal in zoom range to my small rx100) because like you, I don't like changing lenses.
So my question is, what should my 2nd telephoto zoom be, if I go with 18-135 as main lens? 70-300 overlaps by 65mm! The 100-400 is an obvious choice but it can be pretty heavy while hiking. Any ideas? Thank you!
Hi! Welcome to the Fujifilm family!!! Lately, I’ve been using the 16-80 and 70-300 when using 2 lenses. I haven’t retired the 18-135, but if I think I’ll need that extra zoom reach, I’ll use the 16-80 to be just a little wider and have 1 stop faster aperture as well. If you do shoot a lot with just one lens, the 18-135 would be the way to go to add with 70-300. Even though it has some overlap with 70-300, I’m usually at at least 200mm when using the 70-300… Nice to have all these great options!
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks for the reply; I agree with your suggestion. Since I tend to reach 200 mm on my rx100 quite often, getting the one all-in-one lens like a 18-135mm feels prudent. I cannot afford both the 16-80 and 18-135. And 70-300 with TC...also prudent!
I've a few questions though:
1) Does the 18-135 lens creep when not in use, hanging by your side lens facing down? Asking because I intend to use the peak design capture clip.
2) Can you do a comparison of 1.4x TC vs 2.0x TC; if you have both of them. The fine balance between image sharpness and the trade off for extra reach debate.
3) SD card: Have heard the angry photographer and several others strongly suggest not to use Lexar. I tend to shoot continuous but only 3 to 4 frames at a time, so as to not miss the moment. No sports or wildlife etc. Would a SanDisk Extreme Pro suffice for my needs?
Also, the fuji lens roadmap shows a 18-120 (no aperture mentioned) coming in 2022...it looks quite big though. And hope you can get your hands on the new tamron 18-300 for x mount. The sony version has got some great reviews.
Thanks for your review! How would you compare it to the 50-140mm regarding the image quality?
Hi Shervin! Thanks for your comment. Short version - the 50-140 is better image quality in my experience. But, heavier and not as "fun." So, I use the 50-140 for paying assignments and the 18-135 for personal and more casual photos. Here's my video review of the 50-140 ruclips.net/video/8A2EUG9vOiI/видео.html
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks! I just received your reply while I was comparing both lenses in a camera shop, and it's exactly as you told me. I could tell that the 50-140 had a better image quality, even on the small screen. I do want to create that 'special' look, so I went with the 50-140.
@@shervinsardari Congratulations! It's a great lens, and I hope you have many wonderful times creating photos together :)
I've got a question, is it only my lens issue or maybe it's common to 18-135: front element "drops out" (like if you do zoom-in to 135) while I'm walking with lens attached to camera on my neck and I have to zoom out it back.. Have you also faced it?
Hi Artur! Thanks for watching and this is a great question. My copy of the 18-135 does not have the “lens creep” you mention. I think that is something that could happen as the lens gets older or it might carry from lens to lens. Having said that, I have not seen anyone else mention that as an issue with this lens… Hope that helps a little!
@@MSladekPhoto Thank you, I've bought used one it was quite in good condition on photo but seems like though good exterior it was in heavy use (there is even several dust dots inside of lens block).
Hi. Thanks for a great review, it' really boosts my confidence for considering this lens. Still, I notice in the description that you also own the 16-80mm f/4. I'm a Fujiilm beginner and I'm looking for an all-in-one lens for travelling, I do a lot of trekking/hiking when travelling and I'm a small guy so bringing multiple lens is not an option (I learned it from experience with a Nikon with just only 2 lenses). My question is, after reading countless reviews, many people prefer the 16-80mm f/4 over this 18-135mm lens and I wonder why. Could you share some insights from your experience with these two? I have used the Nikon 18-70mm and I know 70mm or 80mm would probably not enough for me but all the love for the Fujifilm 16-80mm f/4 gets me a bit confused. Thanks and best regards.
Hi! Thanks for your comments and questions. The short answer is that while I do have the 16-80mm, I haven't used it very much as it was on my wife's camera. Until she dropped the lens and now it awaits repair or replacement. If I only had one lens, I would still go with the 18-135. I like the extra reach on the telephoto end - but that's my "style." The 16-80 gets you one stop more light at constant f/4, so that's nice. The 16-80 weighs 440g, while the 18-135 weighs 490g - not a huge weight difference, but noticeable. I think any visual quality difference between the 16-80 and 18-135 is also pretty small, and probably not noticeable for most people. I always remind myself when faced with these difficult choices - "There are no perfect lenses. There are no terrible lenses. Choose one, and go create photos!" And then, I usually watch another 10 review videos - haha. Good luck with this tough decisions and happy hiking and photo making!
@@MSladekPhoto Thank you for your super prompt response. Your answer sounds very reasonable. I guess I'll buy the 18-135mm anyway for that 55mm extra zoom. Btw, do you have any comments on the low light performance out in the nature of this lens, let's say bonfire atmosphere and such context?
Hi again! In my experience, the 18-135 focuses well in low light when paired with the X-T3 or cameras with same processor that perform better in low light. The image stabilization works very well in my experience, and I can get away with 1/60 most of the time, and I don't mind using higher ISO's (3200-6400) on the X-T3. Hope that helps!
@@MSladekPhoto Wow. That helps a lot. I've got the X-S10 which is said to share the same processor with the X-T4, so I guess it will work well. Thanks to you I have finally come to a decision!
@@valtzythetyrant4462 Yay! I hope you have lots of fun with the lens and camera :)
Whats a prime or premium lens tho? Thanks for the video. Great pictures BTW, cheers
Thanks for your kind words! The best lens is the one that's with you ;)
Premium is about the quality of the lens body, performance, feel, etc.
Prime lenses are lenses that are fixed focal length that don't zoom in or out.
Great lens, but does anyone have issues with 'lens creep' or is it just mine?
Hi Chris! I have not had any lens creep issues with my copy of the 18-135. Sorry you’re experiencing it!
Thanks for the review, why black and white for street photography? :)
Hi Jakob! I'm glad you found the review helpful. I like black & white at times because the photo then becomes different (we see in color), and adds an element of timelessness as colors tend to be associated with certain time periods. Cheers!
@@MSladekPhoto aaahh
@@MSladekPhoto Is it difficult to get blur in fx portraits due to the lens being a little slow? :)
@@jakoberiksen2944 Hi again! Getting blurry backgrounds is... complicated. Obviously, the easiest way is with a fast lens (aperture 2.8 or wider), however you can also get blurry backgrounds with "slower" lenses such as 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6. Here's how - remember that depth of field is affected by not only aperture, but focal length (more telephoto = LESS depth of field), subject distance to lens (closer to lens = less depth of field) and subject distance to background (more distance from background = less depth of field.) So, with the 18-135 if I want blurry background, I zoom to about 135mm, use f/5.6, get relatively close to my subject, and keep my subject some distance (at least a few meters) from the background. Hope that helps!
Would you say it’s a good lens for beginners?
I think so. It’s very versatile, and can help you see lots of different options for your photos.
@@MSladekPhotothank you! I ended up getting it and really like it so far. There is one thing I wonder if you can help me with though. I am still new to my camera/photography, but I don’t understand how to change my aperture with this lens. Unlike the prime lens I have it doesn’t have the ring, so from what I read I should be able to use the front dial to change the aperture. I made sure the lens is not switched to Auto, my camera mode is aperture priority, my front dial is configured correctly in settings, and the f stop is showing in blue on my screen which, according to what I read, means I should be able to manipulate it myself. However when I turn or press the dial it does not change. Any idea what I am doing wrong? 😢 Thanks for your time
@@elle96425 Hi again! The 18-135 does have have an aperture ring. It's the ring closes to the camera body. Note: it does not have aperture numbers, as this is a variable aperture lens. So, the aperture ring should work to change aperture value! Hope that helps :)
@@MSladekPhotothank you SO much. I feel silly for not realizing that now lol but “variable aperture lens” was a new term for me haha I purchased the camera used with a prime 35mm so wasn’t used to that. Really appreciate you taking the time to respond, I live in a rural area and haven’t been able to find photography classes or anyone to really mentor me yet so I can’t stress how valuable your vids/comments are to me. Thanks again!
@elle96425 You’re so welcome! Glad to help and also answer any future questions. Best way to reach me is msladekphoto.com/contact. Best wishes!
Hmmm I was getting ready to sell mine I think I'll hold off.
I couldn’t do it. Would feel naked without the 18-135. Lol. Have fun!
But this lens was released in 2019 🤔
Hi Davi! Nope. This lens was released in 2014. I've had it since then ;) Even DPReview agrees - www.dpreview.com/articles/3659416761/fujifilm-launches-weather-resistant-xf-18-135mm-f3-5-5-6-r-lm-ois-wr - check the article date - June 16, 2014.
Does this lens extend by itself (lens creep) when carried lens down?
Hi! No, I have not had any lens creep in the time I’ve had this lens. I did with my old Nikon 28-300 for full frame 😟
@@MSladekPhoto Thanks for the fast reply! I too, have Nikon’s 28-300. It’s good it has a lens lock at 28mm.
@@DragonEye1911 Wow! Small world. I hated the lock because it would forget it was on and then had to take off to zoom. Sometimes missed the shot. I like what Fuji does with the 70-300 - when locked, you can unlock with a little extra twist pressure to zoom. Works really well. Cheers!
Most used word in this video: "aah"
Thanks for counting!
13:40 - it's pathetic, when somebody says what how do I have to do a street photo - doing it in a wrong way by himself. LOL, man, you mustn't do a street photography with such a long focal distance (13:42)! BTW - photograhing people looking at their phones is a very bad, boring way to do a street photo.
Hello! Thanks for watching and sharing your comment. It seems that we have differences of opinion about what makes a photo boring or interesting, and that's one of the cool things about sharing art - you get to learn what other people like and don't. I wish you the best in your photo adventures!
@@MSladekPhoto yours is a WAY too nice response to a really mean spirited and unnecessary comment. Nice review by the way.
@@desmondpainter7313 Hi! What you don't see is what I was thinking - lol. Thanks for your encouragement and kind words. Have fun out there!
Nice review....Until you made this "COVID stuff" statement 😩 Please stay with the camera stuff you obviously have expertise in. Don't spread political propaganda, please.
I have a good friend who had Covid and was in the hospital for a month and still has lingering effects. So, it’s not propaganda to me. Just as you have the freedom to share your opinion in your comment, I have the freedom to share non-photography thoughts on my channel. Stay well!
Hard to be political when the virus is all over the world.
What a stupid comment. How are your vaccines treating you?
I've been eyeing this lens for a long time! I had the Sony equivalent for a while and it was super soft on the long end. I picked up a 100-400 yesterday that I'm pretty stoked about!
Nice! The 100-400 has been on my list for a long time. Can never quite justify cost vs current likely uses. I have the 70-300 on order, so we’ll see!