I don't mind this thing being added to more than just the american tech tree.... but seriously Germany, Japan and Italy? All these 3 are a common enemy of america at this BR and just like the Sherman, this thing is losing a lot of it's uniqueness because almost everyone has it. It would had been fine if it was only America, Britain and France
@@sincereeastman6972 I won't stop playing just because you tell me to, if that were the case then where's my American King Tiger? My British IS3? Why bother picking a tech tree if everyone is going to have the same vehicles? TECH TREE buddy, it's supposed to be unique not rated E for everybody Look it's fine for vehicles to be shared but not this much.
@ post war Germany Italy and Japan weren’t even allowed to make their own shit till the late 50’s, of course they’ll get lent American vehicles. It’s called HISTORY and gaijin made a emphasis on History for War Thunder
@@sincereeastman6972 History is no excuse when those countries still has better vehicles to fill them out like the Wespe and the Hummel fitting the low tier HE slinger for Germany and the Honi 2 for Japan. Sure they can't make vehicles after the war but there are still vehicles they used that still aren't in the game. Buddy you speak like Germany doesn't have an extensive tech tree here because it "weren't even allowed to make their own shit till the late 50's" By including the context of HISTORY, Russia can use the Maus because they have it. Germany can use the B1 french heavy tank as well as the low tier French tech tree because they have a lot of them when they captured France (Some of which are actually used and repurposed) and the other countries can use each other's tanks because I am sure they managed to capture the enemy's vehicles. Capturing and sometimes reusing the enemy's vehicles is a thing in HISTORY and as you can see, Germany has Russian tanks but they are atleast premiums and have some difference with the Russian versions (although very small). And yes I can be disproven wrong here when only America, Britain and France are the only ones that are in the regular tech tree while the others are premium but from what I can tell, that's not going to be the case. What I am fighting for is tech tree exclusivity or some sort of limit to it. a vehicle should be limited to one side and not to other, it's the M109 problem all over again. A unique HE bonker shared to more than the actual nation that designed and built it but atleast there's some difference with the short and long gun version and funnily enough Japan don't have an M109 because they have the Type 75 SPH to fill that role. Wouldn't it be better than copy pasting the same vehicle to many tech trees they get their own tanks instead?
@@blob643 What makes the M109 problem worse is that most nations that got it had at least 1 or 2 unique SPGs of their own that could have been added in its place. It's just laziness on the devs behalf. It feels like they are trying to meet a quote for vehicle additions per update. They might as well just add an international tree full of redundant vehicles if they are going to keep this up.
@@sincereeastman6972 Don't underestimate the 25pdr. It has access to some rather decent AP rounds, giving it a respectable 97mm of pen when plugged into the Gajin calculator. The Canadians even designed several APDS rounds for the 25pdr, which we may have been made and tested. While I don't any 25pdr spg could fill the spot of the M44, the Sexton I, Sexton II, Yeramba, and Bishop would work quite well around the 2.3-3.0.
I don't mind this thing being added to more than just the american tech tree.... but seriously Germany, Japan and Italy? All these 3 are a common enemy of america at this BR and just like the Sherman, this thing is losing a lot of it's uniqueness because almost everyone has it. It would had been fine if it was only America, Britain and France
Buddy we’re entering the stage where most nations started to share vehicles, you either with it or you stop playing
@@sincereeastman6972
I won't stop playing just because you tell me to, if that were the case then where's my American King Tiger? My British IS3? Why bother picking a tech tree if everyone is going to have the same vehicles? TECH TREE buddy, it's supposed to be unique not rated E for everybody
Look it's fine for vehicles to be shared but not this much.
@ post war Germany Italy and Japan weren’t even allowed to make their own shit till the late 50’s, of course they’ll get lent American vehicles. It’s called HISTORY and gaijin made a emphasis on History for War Thunder
@@sincereeastman6972
History is no excuse when those countries still has better vehicles to fill them out like the Wespe and the Hummel fitting the low tier HE slinger for Germany and the Honi 2 for Japan.
Sure they can't make vehicles after the war but there are still vehicles they used that still aren't in the game. Buddy you speak like Germany doesn't have an extensive tech tree here because it "weren't even allowed to make their own shit till the late 50's"
By including the context of HISTORY, Russia can use the Maus because they have it. Germany can use the B1 french heavy tank as well as the low tier French tech tree because they have a lot of them when they captured France (Some of which are actually used and repurposed) and the other countries can use each other's tanks because I am sure they managed to capture the enemy's vehicles. Capturing and sometimes reusing the enemy's vehicles is a thing in HISTORY and as you can see, Germany has Russian tanks but they are atleast premiums and have some difference with the Russian versions (although very small). And yes I can be disproven wrong here when only America, Britain and France are the only ones that are in the regular tech tree while the others are premium but from what I can tell, that's not going to be the case.
What I am fighting for is tech tree exclusivity or some sort of limit to it. a vehicle should be limited to one side and not to other, it's the M109 problem all over again. A unique HE bonker shared to more than the actual nation that designed and built it but atleast there's some difference with the short and long gun version and funnily enough Japan don't have an M109 because they have the Type 75 SPH to fill that role. Wouldn't it be better than copy pasting the same vehicle to many tech trees they get their own tanks instead?
@@blob643
What makes the M109 problem worse is that most nations that got it had at least 1 or 2 unique SPGs of their own that could have been added in its place.
It's just laziness on the devs behalf. It feels like they are trying to meet a quote for vehicle additions per update. They might as well just add an international tree full of redundant vehicles if they are going to keep this up.
They gave it to some nations that bearly have a lineup for it xD
I like
4:22 his arm is sticking out of the armour. No wonder this thing can't survive a machine gun if its armour cannot even block an arm😂
I think the sexton would of been a better choice.
lol 87mm HE slinger? No fam this Has the same caliber and pen as the Paladin
@@sincereeastman6972 Don't underestimate the 25pdr. It has access to some rather decent AP rounds, giving it a respectable 97mm of pen when plugged into the Gajin calculator. The Canadians even designed several APDS rounds for the 25pdr, which we may have been made and tested.
While I don't any 25pdr spg could fill the spot of the M44, the Sexton I, Sexton II, Yeramba, and Bishop would work quite well around the 2.3-3.0.
Is it premium?
Copy paste.