Trump Wins Broad Immunity
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июл 2024
- On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald J. Trump is entitled to broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions that he took while in office.
Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times, explains how that ruling will weaken the federal case against Mr. Trump for trying to overturn the last U.S. presidential election, and will drastically expand the power of the presidency itself.
Guest: Adam Liptak (www.nytimes.com/by/adam-liptak) , a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.
Background reading:
• The Supreme Court says Mr. Trump has some immunity (www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/us...) in the election case.
• The decision is an extraordinary expansion of executive power (www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/us...) that will reverberate long after he is gone.
• What the immunity ruling means for Mr. Trump (www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/us...) .
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily (nytimes.com/thedaily?smid=pc-t...) . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Trump's lawyers brought the case but the ruling applies to past and present Presidents - not just Trump.
I'm guessing the next move is Dictator Trump officially declares that the 2020 election was rigged and invalid so Joe Biden was never a president, then go after him with anything he can throw at him no matter how fictional it is
Past , present and future unless overturned ..
Also, future presidents. I believe that’s the main concern here…
There will be no future presidents, if the orange pile of shite is allowed back into our Whitehouse.
@@xx133It shouldn't be. This has been the law of the land since the founding of our country.
@22:30 the ruling would protect Biden from prosecution, but not assassination. Also, how cute that you think there will be “future presidents” 😂😂😂
Take Notes King Biden
In 124 days from the date of this post Americans will go to polls to decide if democracy is worth keeping. Of course, the opposition is perfectly happy to divert your attention to all manner of irrelevant information about the wide range of troubling issues that face us. They say reading is fundamental. More Americans need to start or go back to reading. There is a boring as hell blueprint that the Republicans have been publishing for years. The 2025 edition as always outlines their plans for "day one" execution by the transition team.
I can't bias things by offering my opinion. What I can say is that the direction they are planning is there for you to see but I'm pretty sure that they are confident that you WIL NOT read t and/or if you do, you won't be able to detect the very, very obvious. I have read the entire document - Welcome to CRIMEMERICA 2025!
.... this ruling gives presidental imunity my guy. if biden had the brain left he would do whatever he would want to eleminate trump if he wanted. but i dont think he actualy wants to much like trump clearly didnt want to lock up hilary cuz they all friend. your gona find over the years that this ruling is gona more kill you and me then any politition.
King Biden 😂 nice speech on the world stage… he weak and supports people with mental disorders…common man
Obama did this- targeting al Qaeda but instead hit a tribe with cluster munitions, killing 55 people. Twenty-one were children - 10 of them under five. Twelve were women, five of them pregnant. Look it up. Straight from google. So if trump got put in prison. So would obama
Basically if a President talk about any kind of crimes with his own DOJ it is perfectly fine
They do this because none of the other presidents wouldn’t do that by trump
We are not idiots we can see what they are doing
Why aren’t you just as upset about Judicial immediately or qualified immunity? It seems like the only people who actually have to follow the rules are the peasants.
So do you support this ruling, or not?
@@JadeoftheGlade r u KIDDING?
Yup. Politicians, and the wealthy are really sticking it to the rest of us with this nonsense.
The NY Times has come out AGAINST qualified immunity. Be better.
the system has always been designed to protect the rights of the wealthy and as a cudgel against the poor
Poor Nixon-he was born too soon 🤷🏻♀️.
What I seriously miss here is a valid discussion on how the SCOTUS is corrupted, and by whom. And, what impact this may have had. In particular, but not exclusively, on justices Thomas and Roberts. Also, whether and how a criminal investigation into such payments and gifts to justices could happen.
In Germany, where I live, a an official, public servant or judge can not accept or welcome any gifts by third parties, it is a crime.
In the US, a criminal can become president, and when president he can be pardoned, then as president he can do whatever he wants without legal consequences. Which means the US has become a lawless country. Why should the American people follow the law, the president doesn't have to😂😂😂😂😂
jack smith is not the rightful person to sue a former president who did his official duties.
Yea biden hasn't followed the law for the going on 4 years since he was installed by the Crooked democratic administration along with doj garland
Clearly you didn't read the decision
Correct, Obama should be charged with murder of a US citizen without due process.
@@mikewilliams6025Clearly your gaslighting is on full treason mode.
0:29
The majority of my colleagues seems to have put their trust in our Court’s ability to prevent Presidents from becoming Kings through case-by-case application of the indeterminate standards of their new Presidential accountability paradigm. I fear that they are wrong. But, for all oursakes, I hope that they are right. In the meantime, because the risks (and power) the Court has now assumed are intolerable, unwarranted, and plainly antithetical to bedrock constitutional norms, I dissent
Dissent was extremely powerful
When this ruling will be reversed in the future what they said will be in history books to protect this democracy
So frighteningly corrupt.
Then you didn't listen. I agree that this has been a LONG debate in our country as they conclude.
Sorry but it's not corrupt it's 100% right...if you have a politically appointed judiciary then you have to shield the branch of the office of President...it's pretty obvious if you remove your predetermined bias
"I didnt get my way and I am upset."
@@kennethdavidson6508 what's ur problem?
I know, the Democrat assault on the Constitution knows no bounds.
I’m surprised comments are enabled. Good. Comments are where the only actual journalism is for the Times 😂
Correct, that's why NPR and PBS don't allow comments. And that's the "peoples" airwaves.
There is almost no line between propagandists and journalists anymore.
Especially when they state the truth....just not when it doesn't fit your narrative.
Rather there is no line between the totalitarian anarchist and the MAGA party anymore.
@@lmlowe9100The truth is yes, Trump has immunity from frivolous lawsuits and charges taken in official capacity that didn't violate the constitution.
The ruling also applies to Biden, Obama, bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, and all future presidents.
This is propaganda simply because they isolate the decision as if it ONLY applies to Trump.
@@lmlowe9100When do they tell the truth?
@@nancyerie9666what truth do you exactly want them to say?
The guest sounds like the groundskeeper in Caddy Shack
The whole point of the separation of powers is to provide checks and balances on each other. What is the check on the the Executive Branch after this ruling?
Congress Impeachment Civics 101 😂 That’s the law You should try reading it sometime
@@wolveslair766 The Wolf's Lair (German: Wolfsschanze; Polish: Wilczy Szaniec) served as Adolf Hitler's first Eastern Front military headquarters in World War II.
You will lose......again.
I read all the time. Congress won't impeach a criminal POTUS because SCOTUS has declared that all that POTUS has to do is frame everything as his 'official' duty in order to get away with it. Lucky for us, Trump didn't know that and committed a crime outside the official duty protection.
There is no role for POTUS to play in the election process. What Trump did by calling Georgia officials to try to pressure them into finding votes for him was a personal demand from candidate Trump for more votes. He can be prosecuted by the state of Georgia and by the federal government for that criminal act.
You will lose.....again.
@@wolveslair766You’re asking them to do something they have never heard of.
@wolveslair766 You expect congress to work for country over party? This congress has proven incapable of that.
All Hail King Poopy Pants
All hail Donaldshitzinhispants!
"SUPREME Court DOESN'T CARE" has been their motto for years.
The ceremonial motto is: "Meretrices Sumus, Empti et Venditi"
We just watched this in Revenge of the Sith.
Yup
Mitch McConnell: "He's guilty but I'm not voting to impeach as the courts will deal with him".
The courts: "Yeah, nah. He can do what he likes".
Remember when Republicans fought a war to free all the Democrat's slaves?
If they had achieved a conviction by impeachment this wouldn't be happening. But Pelosi rushed the impeachment without EVIDENCE and he was acquitted.
In 124 days from the date of this post Americans will go to polls to decide if democracy is worth keeping. Of course, the opposition is perfectly happy to divert your attention to all manner of irrelevant information about the wide range of troubling issues that face us. They say reading is fundamental. More Americans need to start or go back to reading. There is a boring as hell blueprint that the Republicans have been publishing for years. The 2025 edition as always outlines their plans for "day one" execution by the transition team.
I can't bias things by offering my opinion. What I can say is that the direction they are planning is there for you to see but I'm pretty sure that they are confident that you WIL NOT read t and/or if you do, you won't be able to detect the very, very obvious. I have read the entire document - Welcome to CRIMEMERICA 2025!
Head of the FBI James Comey says Hilary Clinton broke the law when she was secretary of state but no one wants to prosecute her.
You mean mealy mouthed Mitch McConnell. Who's in bed with the Chinese government.
Please record your videos at a higher volume level.
Insane.
The door is now open for Biden, if he loses November he can legally pull a Trump
That would take the entire political system to go after Biden like the did trump for it to apply there silly goose
The political system didn't go after TraitorTrump...the judicial system did, because he committed crimes.
You don't understand anything that's going on right now😂
Let's hope Biden goes after TraitorTrump now.
Lock up the orange pile of shite.
The Supreme Court majority has reserved for itself the power to determine what is and is not an official act and has no requirements to apply rulings evenly. Biden and Trump could do exactly the same criminal acts and be judged differently. The only Constitutional recourse would for for Congress to force reforms on the Court which would require nearly unimaginable majorities.
The breathless pandering in this segment is telling.
You obviously didn't comprehend. I feel so bad that you have to belittle what you don't understand.
Are you surprised? Lol these reporters are all lefties and think everyone who don't agree with them are bad 🤷🏽♂️
What is an example of “pandering” in this segment?
talking about the dissent as if it has weight. she's the dumbest supreme court justice we've ever seen @@WhyTheHorseface
@@WhyTheHorsefaceThat ruling has Always been there Nothing new Smh 🤦♀️
Too late! Who made up the term "presidential immunity" anyway? What about non-presidential immunity? Or universal immunity? Absolute immunity? Can an immune president grant immunity to anyone else? Can the president abolish the courts to prevent them from reversing rulings?
Biden should be celebrating this ruling, he benefits most.
Nah... his were not official acts of the presidential office.
@@phillippac.7469
Funny how Donny dumb dumb thinks he can get the Stormy hush payment decision overturned despite it happening prior to the election. You can’t use your privilege retroactively. He’s so dumb. Like you.
@phillippac.7469 What actions specifically?
@@ConsciousRobot Burisma for one... or Ukraine more broadly.
Well, Rome went Kingdom>Republic>Empire>Defunct, why can't we? We love bread and circuses and many don't care who's in power or about participating in their own governance anyway. We had an okay run of it, but I suppose we were due an orange Caligula.
This is delusional
This the fork in the road we are currently at.
@@thesloresby5128
It's what's happening.
On the other hand, you could see this as a masterclass in US constitutional law and realize we are taking the country back from the families who have ruled the land for decades. Yes, we are about to lose the country..but not in the way you are thinking.
@@lmlowe9100 Stop crying wolf. No one cares.
So can Biden get rid of Trump and would it be legal ?😂
Surely this s a point of order moving forward, not looking back.
Judges and agents have immunity in a similar capacity. It just means you dont sue or charge them directly in those cases but instead the agency they work for takes on the liability of whatever actions.
Agreed. Obama ordered the killing, by drone, of two Americans he wanted dead. No one cared.
No. This is completely different. The president has far more latitude in what they can do, and with this, nothing they do can ever be called into question, so long as they say it’s official. Imagine a police officer being able to do a mass m… and having complete immunity. That’s literally the ruling that was passed, but for the president.
@@xx133 Imagine Obama ordering the drone killing of two Americans. Oh wait.... that happened and no one cared. Libs love immunity, but just not for Trump.
@@xx133That's not how it works. He doesn't just magically say "official" and alls well. There's still checks and balances with courts and agencies....
@xx133 The same immunity applies to judges who are unelected. Just look at the corrupt Judge Juan Merchan, whose daughter is raking in millions of dollars representing Democrat candidates, contrary to judicial code of ethics.
The fact that Clarence Thomas was allowed to participate in this case says all we need to know about SCOTUS.
We know that more than one of them have taken bribes!
That’s just dumb.
@@jamesbennett5430No, Thomas is completely corrupt, million dollar vacations from a billionaire, and his wife was involved in the attempted coup.
@@nosuchthing8😂🤦♀️
@@jamesbennett5430 You obviously know nothing about conflict of interests in the legal arena and recusal of judges. I do. Be careful who you are calling dumb.
On the eve of Independence Day we have a king. Let’s test this have seal team 6 bring Trump to a CIA black site
Cant.
Or a Turkish embassy
Secret service listening? 🤔
@@wolveslair766 technically they, secret service, are part of the executive branch. Biden is their boss lol
TDS much???
His Judge's 👑
Nobody real gives a rip about the NYT
Yesterday we lost our democracy and moved into an autocracy governed by an elected monarch. A monarch who can rule with no limits and controls. The Founding Fathers most feared this outcome and thus, I’m renouncing my citizenship and moving out of this American banana republic.
Just don't go to Nicaragua, Ortega is a nut - job over there .
BYEBYE
Go move to Canada, better apply now because you have a million jeets in line ahead of you
Bye 😘
This don't apply to his state trial. 11 July T minus 9
You don't care about law and order unless it means Trump goes to jail. You have not learned anything during this masterclass in constitutional law.
God bless America Amen!
Paul Trump zipper down and that judge just had a pop out of it
Wrong
hi
خوب بود❤
President Trump just won the presidential election thank you 😂
Is that right! I would not be so cocky if I were you! He is still facing prison time.
Justice Thomas obiter dictum puts Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's legitimacy as a special prosecutor into question.
He's right.
These guys speak as slowly and as weakly as Biden did at the last debate. 🤦♂️
So does Biden
Hey Dems , this sound is for you : mwah mwah mwah.. MWAAAAHHH ! 🎶
Even the questioner is a biased liberal! When shall journalists move away from activism?
Interesting😅😅😅
discussion....that's all I'm gonna say
For every President!
So did Biden!!
Thank you, Moscow Mitch!
Only here because I saw trump in the click bait! #trump2024. P.s I'm not a straight white male conservative! Be proud that you are white! Just as I'm proud I'm not white. BE YOU!
So you’re a gay white male “conservative”. Congratulations
Yahoo !
A disaster.
Treason should be dealt with the old fashioned way.
Yeah, so did Biden 😂 thats goodbye Trump.
Basically if the Genie is out of the bottle, it can’t be back as the check and balances are destroyed!!! Good job Supreme court!!
This will do for basic rule of law what Citizen’s United did for campaign finance.
If it was in the duties of the president. Over throwing an election is NOT in the presidential duties nor is paying a porm star
😂 He didn't overthrow an election. He had evidence of election fraud, and he did his duty as president to bring it to light to protect the country from future fraud.
Since he wasn't charged with overthrowing the government and being extorted by a pornstar is a crime of the pornstar. Then what's your point?
Saying that you believe you won an election is not crime. Filing election lawsuits is not a crime. Asking the vice-president not too certify an election is not a crime. Paying a porn star to sign an NDA is not a crime. Marking the payment for the NDA, a legal document, as a legal expense is not a crime.
Atempting too prosecute your lead political rival on trumped up charges is a crime, Extorting money from someone by threatening too slander them in the press is a crime.
Double-think is one hell of a drug!
This headline is a flat-out lie. Go reread the decision.
Lies
i absolutely hate the new york times. you deserve to go out of business, because you are the WORST media company.
Is it safe to say you're voting Trump? 😂
@@JadeoftheGlade absolutely not. cant stand the guy, he's driving us straight into a dictatorship. i just cant stand nyt and think they belong in the garbage
Name one thing they said that was a lie. Cite your sources. Oh wait, you won't. Because you're a low information voter.
im very much not in favor of trump. i hate the dude, and cant stand nyt because theyre terrible media
@@goronado8446 uh sure you are, qanon cultist boy. wink wink..
😭
Awesome. Now a President Trump can grab all the 🐈 he wants. Official business, baby! 🩱😎🥂
You deserve the candidate you are stuck with
Which side is that directed to … ?
@@vinista256 The fact that you even asked 🤯
@@JCVenomous seriously, are you talking about the narcissistic sociopathic congenitally lying convicted felon and adjudicated fraudster and rapist who attempted a violent overthrow of the duly elected government or the frail, stuttering, cognitively declining one? And which do you deem the worse option?
This is just commmon sense , Presidents must have immunty in order to function as President .
well said
Presidents have already had that.
We have had no criminal prosecutions of presidents for committing acts of war which could be interpreted as war crimes, for example.
The case here wasn't about shielding presidents from criminal liability in performing acts necessary to the office of the president.
Trump was claiming blanket immunity for all acts as president, committed before holding the office, and prosecuted after leaving office, which he didn't get.
But he got the next best thing: the Supreme Court as the final (and really only) arbiter on what actions a president performs which falls under protected behavior and what doesn't.
Trump's argued that because he was sitting in the Oval Office when he signed checks from his private buiness account to pay his lawyer for campaign violations, that criminal action should be considered official. If Trump "relocated" highly classified national security documents to his private residence and business while in office and showed them to unvetted guests, that could be deemed an official act, despite legislation which already says otherwise.
The SC just needs a majority willing to say so and there is no need for justification and there is no check on the SC. They even wrote away the ability for Congress to set legislation defining "official acts" or disallowed acts. They could even rule inconsistently in favor of a same-party president and against an opposite-party president for the exact same acts. There is no direct recourse for uneven application of this ruling, unless Congress gets enough of a majority agreeing to force Court reforms.
This is why this is being called granting the president status as king: anything the king does is legal simply by the act of doing as long as the SC majority favors the president.
@@emmalee866yes, as president for acts of war, but what about as a candidate? This was a ridiculous decision and I hope Biden doesn't take advantage of it.
Why? Why should the President not be expected to follow the law just like everyone else?
@@user-iq42 13 service members that died on Biden's watch during a terrorist attack at Abbey Gate on August 26, 2021.
The ruling was not complete immunity but specified what items were immune.
Trouble with all these cases the democrats waited until an election year to begin them thinking that it would tie him up during campaign season. All of these cases dated back to 2021 or earlier. If they had filed them in 21 then perhaps most would have been decided by now. When your motivation is political then justice finds you.
Exactly
There's nothing political about Donnie Dumps cases. He committed these crimes and they're catching up to him. Unfortunately the justice system grinds slowly. And so far, every case that's been brought, criminal trump has been found guilty. That there's so many is a large part of the problem.
They don’t wait until ‘21 to file it, and Trump started running again immediately to try and cry “election interference” as he knows he’s committed acts of criminality and treason. He gives zero shits about anyone but himself and will actually destroy this country if he gets his dirty criminal hands on power. Your project 2025 is the most criminal, anti-American proposal ever put forth, and the founding fathers would tell you that.
Nice theory - A political science degree may determine if what you said is truth or conjecture.
@iminepiclub I think SCOTUS just decided that😂
This is terrifying.
Why? It's the constitution which has served this country well for 250 years. What do you find terrifying?
@@phillippac.7469where in the constitution does it say that? It’s scary because if trump wins he 100% absolutely unequivocally WILL abuse it.
Only stupid people are terrified. Meaning all those that believe the msm.
@@phillippac.7469 why has no president needed the immunity until trump came along? its extremely terrifying he can do whatever he wants now, assassinating political opponents, whatever, you name it he can get away with it now. imagine if nixon never got in trouble for watergate
you should because democrats suck
This country is falling apart every day 😭😭 It is painful to watch. We can't even do anything. It is wild
No! You do not understand power.
@@JS-gt5bhlike hitler power?? Lmao.
Bro...
Biden is King !
He can Even use Seal Team 6 to the Supreme Court
@@billy6427What kind of idiot calls someone their king lol? You must be worth dogshit.
I. DECREE & DECLARE THE WRATH OF GOD WILL COME UPON THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE JUDGES & TRUMP FOR EVERY INDICTMENT, CONVICTIONS IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS. THE WRATH OF GOD WILL NOT HAVE MERCY ON THEM FOR THEY HAVE BROKEN EVERY COMMANDMENTS OF THE 10TH COMMANDMENT. TRUMP ISN'T THE PRESIDENT. WE'RE IN A SPIRITUAL WAR STARTED BY TRUMP. TRUMP IS GOING TO BE AT ONE OF HIS RALLIES & DROP DEAD IN THE MIDST OF ONE OF HIS LIES.
biden can send seal team six to mara lago now
Dems love the military now? Always flip flopping
Let's hope!
If you want to make a stupid comment you should clarify your stupid comment. I'm struggling to figure out how what you just said make any sense?
They wouldn’t go
If he did, he'd be impeached and convicted and then prosecuted in the judicial court. Oh but wait...he's too old and feeble to stand trial😂
This court is clearly in favor of 45
You think? He appointed 3 of them under the guidance of the Koch Bros who all lied under oath to Congress.
How? By following the law, constitution and past precedent?
Where there is corruption and corrupted are involved, and no iQ people are judging the people or President, in this case, should be ashamed of their ignorance of the Constitution law, even the New York Times Roberts.
*Media should be without prejudice and favoritism*.
So too should judges.
@@lmlowe9100and how were the justices prejudiced in this hearing? If any WERE prejudiced, it would be the 3 dissenters as this wasn't a "Trump" immunity hearing. It was a presidential immunity hearing, which also applies to Biden and all other former and future presidents.
@@jeradblazek677 tf are you talking about? no one in their right mind would say a president is immune from any form of prosecution.
@@jeradblazek677you obviously didn't read the opinions. Please, please do. Then tell me if you think Biden should act, "to save our country" from the radical MAGA. I don't. I'm a Madisonian pluralist. Whoever you are, left or right, you're an American. People don't realize good when they have it. Neither side is evil. Different values. That's hard for a political system to fairly transcend. I've never seen a better one.
@@aes0p895thank u
Which makes prosecuting Obama and Biden and Clinton.....difficult
This is not a Trump victory. It just clearly defines the parameters of presidential power. It helps all presidents.
No, it hurts all Americans because it puts the president above the law. The framers specifically did not want this, but this theocratic Supreme Court does. Shame on all 6 of those traitors and liars.
The court merely solidified the current precedent.
Giant nothing-burger.
But Democrats delusion and gaslighting are party pillars so....
thanks for pointing this out!
The examples given in the dissent response to the ruling say otherwise.
But it doesn’treally define what office as president vs unofficial acts
“Supreme Court Burns Constitution” there I fixed the title for you.
You don't understand the constitution. It's pretty solid and has served the country well.
@@phillippac.7469 I do understand the constitution, “presidential immunity” is nowhere in it. It was designed that way because they didn’t want one person being above the law.
"Supreme Court makes it all but impossible to hold a president accountable for anything they do as president."
@@phillippac.7469
Well not for much longer. SCOTUS is CORRUPT and will do everything to make certain trump is protected.
@@JadeoftheGlade "It was illegal for Obama to attack Libya because 1) he had no authorization from the United Nations to do so and 2) Libya was no military threat ... " The world has been so chaotic since Obama illegally attacked Libya, can we hold Obama accountable for his mistake?
Broad immunity? Well, I hope that includes immunity from that broad, Stormy!
That includes Bidens on daughter that he likes to shower with.
TAKE NOTES KING BIDEN 🙂🙂🙂
Would have to be impeached & convicted for the same act he would be charged in court. What is so complicated
This is some sick sh*t. They only feel sorry for him because they’re criminals themselves. What I look like feeling sorry for a criminal and trying to help them.
It has nothing to do with "feelings"😂. It's the law of the land. It's not a difficult concept to understand if you remove your own bias.
When Seal Team Six comes to visit SCOTUS they will think again, too late.
D.C Court 😂 the pentagon 😂 Democrat success😂
Unbelievable a court can rule in wrong doings inable this man
What did he do? , leftwing political accusations we all know Nancy Pelosi is directly responsible for Jan 6th.
Buddy is finally immune from stormy Daniels? Or are we talking about a different broad?
Nothing changed. Impeachment was always the mechanism to handle charges against a President. Some people, especially the ones proclaiming to be experts, need to read the Constitution. It doesn't take that long to read. Give it a try. Then remember what they were trying to tell you and compare it to what you read for yourself.
If this were true, then presidents have an automatic statute of limitations for all actions which ends when the president quits the office. The Senate can't convict an ex-president because Senatorial conviction is just removal from office.
Ex-presidents are not granted special status in the Constitution; the impeachment process applies to sitting presidents who have already been enjoying immunity for acts committed while carrying out presidential duties.
That's why "the most persecuted president" got hit with multiple charges in the term after he left office: it's broadly understood that you don't press charges against a sitting president because that's Congress' job.
The reason that the Constitution doesn't fully flesh out legal liabilities for ex-presidents is because the Constitution wasn't written for criminals to be elected president. When presidents leave office, they return to the same status as every other citizen and can be prosecuted for crimes the same as everyone else.
The untested boundary is what acts can be considered official and unofficial; the ruling grants exclusive power to the SC to decide that by whatever basis the majority chooses and is not required to apply the ruling evenly. The SC also removed Congress's ability to enact legislation to define presidential immunity.
@@junkkitty2009 Thank you for the knowledge, but we both know that troglodyte won't bother reading this.. More than one paragraph and they'd rather watch a youtube video..
Goes to the lower courts which depending on their bias will return to SCOTUS
Trump’s lawyers have gained a lead change per se’
We’re screwed.
You can reason among your self but the true is a true
Violating his oath Wouldnt be a protected activity
That's the whole point. He didn't violate his oath.
@@phillippac.7469July 11th is only a few days away
Oh no, they can't endless keep in court for shit he never did, woah. Anyway.
You're a child.
😂
Remember that Joe Biden! Not all and you are not above the laws...
that's insane, if you were a Qanon guy a few years ago this would definitely validate you. looks like we really need the swamp drained this time.
Qanon guys are with Trump lmao
There’s Q and then there’s Anon 2 different groups Try Again when you know what your talking about 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😅
Hispanics and Latinos for President Trump…..we will vote for him…2024
Why do you want an authoritarian for president? Do you think Project 2025 is a good thing for freedom and justice? Genuinely curious.
“We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be"
🧡Love🧡this🧡video🧡
He set it up by seoecting three judges. Idk how thats even legal
Seems there are a number of things you don't know.
what country are you from? study american law. the president is the one who is in charge of nominating Supreme Court judges when there is a vacancy.
@@TrumpWonTwice
These judges are corrupt.
@@TrumpWonTwiceexcept when Mitch McConnell holds a seat open for more than a year when Obama was president saying “let the people decide,” then installs an unqualified sycophant in Barrett two months before the election.
Trump would have had one justice to put on the bench, it McConnell violated the constitution then violated his own “rule.”
Republicans are traitors, liars, and fascists now. It’s pathetic
What is a woman? Bribens choice Smh
Remember that Joe Biden! Not all and you are not above the laws...of the US Constitution.
No he didnt , no he doesn't and you guys are the worst media ever.
Did y even bother to read the ruling, or the arguments? As long as he says it’s “official”, he is not only immune, but he cannot be questioned. Trump’s lawyer literally said, he could ass… his political opponent and still would be immune. The court literally ruled that to be valid as long as the president says that it they classify it as “official”, which as the ruling reads, is up to the discretion of the president, and cannot be questioned.
Knowing how zealous American political activist are -? If Trump lives long enough to see Nov 5th I would be surprised if he does live that long. Scotus has started a civil war only Biden and Congress have the power to end this nightmare.
This is so wrong when is someone going to step in and stop this.
Your brainwashed
@@therondon8437 *You're
Trump 2024!
Yes, Democrat delusion, frivolous lawsuits, & gaslighting are just soooo wrong.
Always has been.
Remember when Republicans fought a war to free all the Democrat's slaves?
Just found out AOC is drawing up articles of impeachment on the justices
All three branches have immunity for official acts. It would be stupid to deny the executive branch while upholding immunity for the legislative and judicial branches.
The announcement is all that is needed, the full audio is appreciated, but a waste of time. He was granted immunity, 'nuff said.
trump lied through the entire debate and topped it off with incredibly racist comments, I wouldn't call that a win..
What did he lie about and what was racist?
Awww little lamb🐑 I wish I could help you, but I understand there will be some who refuse to see the truth.
Yet you refuse to call out Bidens lies let alone his senility.
Imagine supporting Joe Biden on 7/2/2024
@@phillippac.7469 you sound like the perfect buyer for my oceanfront property in WI