I think they were tiny because it wasn’t an actual board. I’m pretty sure they were playing on a wooden table that had a chess board engraved or marked over the top of the wood
@@EmpinadoMaxbmdggTheSun Chess pieces are the powerful creatures since they can stand on white tyles. Checkers are unable to contact with white ones so it technically looks like chess creatures are just dissapearing and then attacking from nowhere
@@Darkpq1742 Errrr, I would take a look between 16th and 17th century. Guns basically removed armour from the equation for a long time. Being able to break through the breastplate
@@avatarmufasa3628 Hmm, Very true But also the quality of both bullets and Gun (And type of gun, Plus the range when shot) mathered a lot (But this is not saying that A Cheap knigth armor could work, Since normaly it needs to be extremly good quality to not break) I think the Main problem whit the armor i just realised is that It affects more in Mobility too and where the bullet lands..And a shield could be too slow to be effective And could just be flanked, Depends on the terrain to (Like the Famus "Bring a Knife to a gun figth, Terrain time and other factors mathered a lot too) I def see your point do
The checkers can always get to the other side of the board and be kinged. That way they can somehow make a barricade around the king because doesn’t a kinged checker move horizontally or vertically?
As a kid I figured Chess pieces would be far more powerful because of their movement, turns out I was right but the checkers being unable to capture someone against a wall is almost as big a deal
Checkers can beat chess, but the person who controls the checkers will have to be more intelligent and strategic A disadvantage of the game of checkers is that chess can skip moves using the bishop located on the square where it has the color in which the checkers are not located. I wrote everything translating from Portuguese to English because I'm Brazilian, so sorry for any mistakes
@@Werlin12it's impossible for checkers to win, as the king will always be able to move to a light square, which the checkers pieces cannot attack - unless there was a some rule restricting the king's movement, or a different win condition, checkers will basically always take an L
@@RobertChambers1522 I once read a comment which said "There is NO rule in chekers that you cant capture pieces horizontaly or verticaly, this just never happens because in chekers you cant move to a white square at first." Idk if its true i never read chekers rules but if true, in theory. You coud take the white pieces in those directions and jump to the next black square.
If you can get enough checkers, you can play a trap with the king King on a light square => a checker on an adjacent dark square => a king checker on the other side of the board => the chess king captures a checker => a king checker captures the chess king
@moderndayentertainer.9516 Checkers take pieces by jumping over them, so they can't take pieces from the edges of the board. Chess can freely move there and be invincible. Also checkers are obliged to attack when possible. Chess are not.
Just a questions cuz I'm not familiar with the rules and mechanics of checkers, but doesn't any chess piece that has the ability to go to a white square basically turn invincible?
I love how brutal, and yet, gentle this game was. kudos also, there could be extra rules, like, if a checker reaches the end, it turns in to queen, and pawn turns in to checker, that would be fun, lol
Actually if the pawn would reach the end he would become a queen, but she is a fake and in fact a bishop. So checkers would become true queens while pawns would become fake queens.
@@MirrorOfEmotionsШашки дошедшие до края противоположной доски становились бы Дамками - а Дамка как мы знаем ходит так же как и шахматный слон(с одним НО,- они бы ходили только по чёрным клеткам)....🤷♂️🤔
Checkers never wins so long as chess keeps king on a wall where a checkers piece can’t capture it. Chess will either capture all checkers pieces or force a draw.
I think to make the game a bit more fair, white should remove the queen and 2 pieces, and the checkers goal to win the game is to somehow reach the other side of the board. I tried doing this concept with my classmates and its actually fun Edit: So we kind of updated the rules on this with my classmates after a few games. Patch 1.1 - When one of the checker's pieces get blocked off by a chess piece, the chess piece gets removed after 2 moves to avoid stalling and preventing the checker's piece from reaching the end. - There are now 2 WAYS the checker's pieces can win. Either the king gets captured, or one of the pieces reach the end of the board. - The light squared bishop gets removed, along with the queen and a knight. Patch 1.2 -Checkers team will now have their own 2 queens in the back. Meaning the 2 pieces will be used like a bishop but the mechanics of how they take piece will remain the same as checkers. This may seem outlandish and could ruin the game but we had to think of balancing the game somehow. So far this was the best solution we could think of while playing, Me (chess) lost to checkers a few times. (Chess3-4 Checkers). - Re-added the white squared bishop (for fun) - Checkers will now be the first to attack instead of chess. - If one of the checker's pieces manages to reach the end of the board, and a chess piece is blocking the way, they can take the piece after a move. (This one had the most impact on balancing the game) Sorry there haven't been many updates, school has been getting cancelled lately due to rain and heat (I live in the Philippines lol) I will take feedback from the comments and update the rules by trying it out with my friends and classmates to make sure the game is fair. So if you want to suggest anything, tell me!
I would never think of doing something like this, interesting to watch, but I think chess would always have the advantage. The checkers have some interesting combo movements, but they are very specific situations, the normal thing is that the checkers are only pawns that move and attack diagonally while chess has pieces that attack and move in all directions.
@@Gloom_Shroom_GamingI care a friendly game doesn’t mean you can adjust pieces after you click the clock you just wasting your opponent time resulting him to win at the end of the game.
Depends on what variation are you playing, chekers variate a lot in diferent countries. Theres one or multiple variations where you can move backwards.
@@urbainleverrier1 No, it is not. Standard Checkers, AKA Draughts, does not allow a backwards move of any kind unless the moving piece is a king. There may be variations of Checkers that allow it, but standard Checkers does not.
@@hypercubemaster2729 I guess I'm wrong then...? That was the checkers I grew up with, we even had tournaments here with that exact rule, maybe our checkers is just a variation
Checkers would be interesting to have as a piece included in your starting chess pieces (like maybe you replace the knights or bishops, or you play with a 10x10 board), but a whole board of them makes it next to impossible to checkmate the king, since they can stand on the other color squares.
Some Buffs I might suggest: Bishops could have the ability to move (but not capture) one space orthogonally, giving them the ability to attack on both colors. The Checkers player, rather than placing the chips on one color on the three starting ranks, completely fills those ranks with chips, thereby having chips on both colors. No calling checks or checkmate. The Checkers player can perform en passant, but unlike pawns, they jump 2 spaces diagonally over the threatened space the pawn jumped over when capturing. This En Passant move cannot be chained with any other capture, it must only be used to capture that pawn. While the chess player loses when the king is captured as per usual, the checkers player loses if all of the chips are gone. If all the chips on one color are gone and the king manages to move to said color, immediate stalemate
@@navyntune8158 That would only be useful for the white bishop since the white bishop can't do anything, but even when you take that into account, overall checkers are MUCH weaker, even with chess having 1 useless piece it's still far stronger, imo checkers needs a buff instead lmao
@@navyntune8158 yeah, but chess is already op. even if you included your buff to checkers, and not your bishop buff, there's no way that checkers would ever win.
Checkers would need to be buffed and chess needs to be nerfed. Maybe letting checkers capture like pawns once per turn. The knight is OP, it can sit on a light square and attack dark squares hoping over pieces, maybe have the pattern changed to 2 squares in one dimension. Take out the light square bishop. The king and queen has to be always on dark squares.
I like the idea of adding them on the 3rd rank of the board on dark squares, making the opening chaotic, and then having them the ability to not only jump over friendly pieces but also check the king even if the king isnt even anywhere near the checkers piece if its positioned in a way that allows it. If they promote they essentially become sort of a side grade to the bishop.
I thought about starting with checkers on light and dark squares, the same area as the chess side. Someone also mentioned kinged checkers being able to move 1 square in any direction or just to change square-color. Also, apparently according to checkers' rules you can capture up, down, left or right -- simply that in checkers an opponent would never be on a light square. Combine these with the ability to multijump-capture and they might stand a chance.
Having the checkers player start with three solid ranks of pieces, instead of 4 ranks of dark square pieces, is the most obvious first step. From there you can add further tweaks depending on how balanced it is.
We actually tried this last night on a whim. I figured that other people would have tried and here we are😂 we did remove so chess pieces to make the number of pieces equal
Hi, I am a game designer, here is my advice: Chess side is significantly stronger than the other. To achieve balance, the following solutions can be considered (choose one): 1, The checkers side can move twice in one turn, and all pieces can jump backward to capture from the start. 2, The chess side loses if three pieces are captured (the king's capture results in an immediate loss). 3, The chess side only has a king and a queen. 4, The chess side's back row consists of four bishops on black squares and one king (the bishops on white squares are invulnerable but have no meaningful presence). 5, The chess side must capture all of the opponent's pieces within 30 moves, or they lose.
If you want to give checkers a leg up since chess _easily_ destroys it, you could say that checkers can jump pieces sideways and/or vertically, just as long as there's still an empty square on the other side. I'd only do it sideways, but that's just me.
With one minute timer it ended up being a who can move faster challenge; but the chess pieces are so much more powerful than the checker pieces it's not a battle it's a slaughter.
Well, the thing that makes it a slaughter is the fact that it's straight up impossible for the checker player to win as they cant capture on white titles, so as long as the king is moved onto a white tile the best the checker player can do is draw the game.
Very cool concept. Earlier I tried this with myself but with a fourth row of checkers pieces and that same amount of checkers pieces on dark and light squares (32 total) vs chess without a queen. Even then checkers never stood close of a chance against chess pieces
Rules to make this a fair game: 1: Checkers pieces can capture vertically or horizontally. 2: Checkers pieces when promoting to king moves like a king, 1 square in any direction including cardinally. 3: Checkers pieces can kamikaze and jump off the board when capturing. 4: Checkers piece can jump off the board, land on an imaginary square, and come back onto the board while capturing another piece. 5: if the king is captured checkers win.
I know that there are at least 2 different rule sets for checkers, but ones i played as a kid you couldn't move back but you could take opponents piece in any direction even if it moves you back
Combine go with checkers and add a few pieces, then edit a few rules, and suddenly it's pretty fair. I'm currently working on balancing these games against each other (along with xianqi and shogi).
This sounds impossible for checkers, if you can get in a position with all on white spaces except 4 on the back line to avoid checker's kinging, then a rook can blaze down one side, round the back, and you're at a huge advantage just in numbers while knowing a piece is only in danger if you move it over to black, which you can guarantee a trade for. That said, its a cool idea and with some balance it could be fun, like the custom all knight gamemode or something. Edit: in fact because you can't take backwards unless kinged, the rook getting to the back line means it can take everything for free. Queen does the same. Literally just open up Queen, go diagonal as far as you can, then up the side and take everything.
Checkers: - Can not move to white - Can not capture anything they can't jump over, while they can be captured at the same time - Are forced to capture whenever possible So good luck fighting chess pieces which have none of these restrictions.
White's objective is to checkmate black's king (this is the goal in chess) but there is no black's king. Black's objective is to take all white's pieces (this is the goal in checkers) but white's white bishop is invincible. The only way this game could end is when one player runs out of time. This is what actually happened.
checkers player wants to take the king and chess player wants to remove all of Black's pieces. I assume it works like that. I'm not going to pretend that's balanced though
My version of the rules say that the objective for black is to stalemate white (since a king on a white square is immortal), while white’s objective is to capture all of black’s checkers.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
What's really impressive is that you were able to find a board where the squares are too small for both sets of pieces.
This lol
Bro the board being so small pissed me off 💀
😂😂😂😂
@@masterlimegaming7095 not as bad as "fixing" an off-center piece to an even worse position like c3 at 1:20
I think they were tiny because it wasn’t an actual board. I’m pretty sure they were playing on a wooden table that had a chess board engraved or marked over the top of the wood
This is like a group of soldiers trying to fight against 4th dimensional creatures that can phase in and out of existence.
But the group of soldier can still fight back
But which one is which?
@@EmpinadoMaxbmdggTheSun Chess pieces are the powerful creatures since they can stand on white tyles. Checkers are unable to contact with white ones so it technically looks like chess creatures are just dissapearing and then attacking from nowhere
Such a genuis comment. I can't state how underrated this genuis comment is.
@@Urchin_spike not to mention pieces like rook, bishop and queen can snipe pieces from across the board
What I got out of this is, don't bring checkers to a chess fight.
Just Like Don't Bring A Knife To A Gun Fight.
@@josephseansunga6361 💀
@@josephseansunga6361 Actually Knigths Armors where ironicly strong aguints bullets, So maybe its a Good idea after all
@@Darkpq1742 Errrr, I would take a look between 16th and 17th century. Guns basically removed armour from the equation for a long time. Being able to break through the breastplate
@@avatarmufasa3628 Hmm, Very true But also the quality of both bullets and Gun (And type of gun, Plus the range when shot) mathered a lot
(But this is not saying that A Cheap knigth armor could work, Since normaly it needs to be extremly good quality to not break)
I think the Main problem whit the armor i just realised is that It affects more in Mobility too and where the bullet lands..And a shield could be too slow to be effective And could just be flanked, Depends on the terrain to (Like the Famus "Bring a Knife to a gun figth, Terrain time and other factors mathered a lot too)
I def see your point do
Humanity's attempt to fight against aliens with superior technology.
And we won. Humans are so cool.
@@gadellomagnollo1810yeah, take that stupid aliens
We are the cheker , and we lost
@@Redvoling lost on time 😭
@@emuccinoit wasn’t looking good anyway
Pawns: We're getting slaughtered out here! We need backup!
Light-square Bishop:
The fact that the pawns suffered 0 causaulties
Theon,y time where the pawns weren’t meat shields
@@SergioPop-po7nihe took two of him, wym?
@@SergioPop-po7ni 0:47
Easiest job in the world.
imagine being the white bishop
Because of that it's draw?
😂😂😂🤣dude will die of boredom
@@One_Man_Two_Face i think he meant that the white colored bishop does nothing
The white bishop can't take any checker pieces. It only moves on white squares
@@Z_kun11 thats why
It's impossible for the checker pieces to checkmate the king, because the king can always just stay on the light squares
they’d just capture the king in this case. checkermate?
@@megascrub3054 if they have him on a white square then that should still be impossible
I guess they would have to agree that a king checkers piece can also jump directly to left, right, up and down.
If the checkers make a queen then it's possible, no?
The checkers can always get to the other side of the board and be kinged. That way they can somehow make a barricade around the king because doesn’t a kinged checker move horizontally or vertically?
As a kid I figured Chess pieces would be far more powerful because of their movement, turns out I was right but the checkers being unable to capture someone against a wall is almost as big a deal
bone apple tea
@@GDNashit more like bone apple shut the hell up
bone app the teeth@@GDNashit
Checkers can beat chess, but the person who controls the checkers will have to be more intelligent and strategic
A disadvantage of the game of checkers is that chess can skip moves using the bishop located on the square where it has the color in which the checkers are not located.
I wrote everything translating from Portuguese to English because I'm Brazilian, so sorry for any mistakes
@@Werlin12it's impossible for checkers to win, as the king will always be able to move to a light square, which the checkers pieces cannot attack - unless there was a some rule restricting the king's movement, or a different win condition, checkers will basically always take an L
If you ever feel useless remember the king’s bishop existed in this game.
He cannot attack.
But cannot be attacked either.
Yes, useless while being immortal.
Any chess piece on a light square or against the wall is invincible lmao
Chess is legit cheating haha
Ffffffffffrrrrrfffffffffffffffp s²xtx😅fñvcvvtt t8😢😮😢@@skyrisesenpaiii678
*Moves to white square*
Checkers: *EEEEHHHHH???!!?! IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!!*
You'd have to let the checkers capture vertically or horizontally
@@RobertChambers1522 I once read a comment which said "There is NO rule in chekers that you cant capture pieces horizontaly or verticaly, this just never happens because in chekers you cant move to a white square at first." Idk if its true i never read chekers rules but if true, in theory. You coud take the white pieces in those directions and jump to the next black square.
@@Nochabon Maybe with that additional rule the game would be a bit less unbalanced.
@@Nochabon oh yeah I like this idea: There's no evidence in checkers rules AGAINST that expansion. Nice.
@@nicbentulan it's known as the "there's no rule that says dogs can't play basketball" -clause.
Light squared bishop: *why are we still here, just to suffer*
LOL
only 1 reply and it was 6 hours ago, now 2 replays
@@DavidV11 hitting you with a reply after ~2 minutes
@@praizq ok
@@DavidV11 Hitting you with a reply after 52 minutes
I like how all the king has to do is either hug the wall or go on a light square to draw. Truly an unstoppable move
Bro can travel along the white squares all the way into the backline of the checkers pieces and start destroying them from the flank
If you can get enough checkers, you can play a trap with the king
King on a light square => a checker on an adjacent dark square => a king checker on the other side of the board => the chess king captures a checker => a king checker captures the chess king
The only way this is fair is if it’s 1 king vs a whole board of checker pieces. Even then, the checker pieces lose.
Dad?
hats because they play wrong Checkers the right ones have two lanes filled completly instand of 3 lanes filled only in half
Me and my brother tried this once, but to make it more fair, we gave checkers both sets and filled their light squares too
I did the same. In this game they gave checkers extra 4 pieces to make numbers equal. Chess still win via edge camping.
@@henrykkeszenowicz4664 edge camping is crazy 💀
@@soep19 I don't get it.
@moderndayentertainer.9516 Checkers take pieces by jumping over them, so they can't take pieces from the edges of the board. Chess can freely move there and be invincible. Also checkers are obliged to attack when possible. Chess are not.
This is why every one minute chess game should have an increment of at least one second.
I love the little handshake at the beginning and end of the game. Such distinguished players, almost brings a tear to my eye
@@InconsistentConsumptions cringe
? its normal
@@AlexandrBorschchev For distinguished players yes. When I play chess with my friends I can't help but flip the board over when I get en passant'd
Common tournament courtesy
Those were the weakest most pathetic unmanly handshakes I have ever seen. Those handshakes shouldn’t make you almost cry.
“Infinity war is the most ambitious crossover in history”
Me:
lol
Overused joke and I'm all for it
Those that can't understand infinity war or Endgame live in a wet dream land 😅😂😅😂
Also isn't Infinity War not even a crossover??
They were all already in the same universe, they just.. met up, but it wasn't a "cross-over".
@implord4197 Awfully condescending comment for something so tame and semantic, lol.
King moves at white spot...
King: I am invincibile!
Just a questions cuz I'm not familiar with the rules and mechanics of checkers, but doesn't any chess piece that has the ability to go to a white square basically turn invincible?
@@Back-Track yes
@@Back-Track yes and no. Only the bishop on the white space is truly invincible. Other pieces has a chance of being captured in one way or another
The king is in the back anyway, the checkers cannot pass end field pieces as they cant hop past them
Draw
0:42 Treating the checkers pieces with the contempt they deserve
I love how brutal, and yet, gentle this game was. kudos
also, there could be extra rules, like, if a checker reaches the end, it turns in to queen, and pawn turns in to checker, that would be fun, lol
Actually if the pawn would reach the end he would become a queen, but she is a fake and in fact a bishop.
So checkers would become true queens while pawns would become fake queens.
or just promote checkers to a bishop+king
@@MirrorOfEmotionsШашки дошедшие до края противоположной доски становились бы Дамками - а Дамка как мы знаем ходит так же как и шахматный слон(с одним НО,- они бы ходили только по чёрным клеткам)....🤷♂️🤔
@@Andrei-Dunaev.
I'm sorry. I can't speak russia.
:(
@@MirrorOfEmotions а зря (
I'd love to see you guys replay this without the timer. Just see how the match ends when both sides have time to strategize.
Chess player wins. Now you know.
Especially since Mr. Chess wasted at least 10 seconds fidgeting with the pieces AFTER hitting the timer.
I know right? The timer is just annoying
yeah i was never a fan of timers in general but 60-secs one is way too bad
Checkers never wins so long as chess keeps king on a wall where a checkers piece can’t capture it. Chess will either capture all checkers pieces or force a draw.
I think to make the game a bit more fair, white should remove the queen and 2 pieces, and the checkers goal to win the game is to somehow reach the other side of the board.
I tried doing this concept with my classmates and its actually fun
Edit: So we kind of updated the rules on this with my classmates after a few games.
Patch 1.1
- When one of the checker's pieces get blocked off by a chess piece, the chess piece gets removed after 2 moves to avoid stalling and preventing the checker's piece from reaching the end.
- There are now 2 WAYS the checker's pieces can win. Either the king gets captured, or one of the pieces reach the end of the board.
- The light squared bishop gets removed, along with the queen and a knight.
Patch 1.2
-Checkers team will now have their own 2 queens in the back. Meaning the 2 pieces will be used like a bishop but the mechanics of how they take piece will remain the same as checkers. This may seem outlandish and could ruin the game but we had to think of balancing the game somehow. So far this was the best solution we could think of while playing, Me (chess) lost to checkers a few times. (Chess3-4 Checkers).
- Re-added the white squared bishop (for fun)
- Checkers will now be the first to attack instead of chess.
- If one of the checker's pieces manages to reach the end of the board, and a chess piece is blocking the way, they can take the piece after a move. (This one had the most impact on balancing the game)
Sorry there haven't been many updates, school has been getting cancelled lately due to rain and heat (I live in the Philippines lol)
I will take feedback from the comments and update the rules by trying it out with my friends and classmates to make sure the game is fair.
So if you want to suggest anything, tell me!
That's a nice idea.
I think to make it more fair the checkers should be replaced with chess pieces
@@joshuad3914That’s a nice idea.
That's absolutely brilliant
Someone made a video where they kept adding rules until it was more fair
0:18 checkers player couldve ent passanted
there was no square to land on, so no
@@dantheman2415 lmao its a joke
Holy hell
En passant is not a checkers rule, its a chess rule
@@HalalUser_1602 oh really
I would never think of doing something like this, interesting to watch, but I think chess would always have the advantage. The checkers have some interesting combo movements, but they are very specific situations, the normal thing is that the checkers are only pawns that move and attack diagonally while chess has pieces that attack and move in all directions.
0:56 he adjusted his pieces after he pressed his clock ☠️
He did this whole game
Maybe it was Magnus Carlsen all along
Who cares, it's a friendly game.
@@Gloom_Shroom_GamingI care a friendly game doesn’t mean you can adjust pieces after you click the clock you just wasting your opponent time resulting him to win at the end of the game.
@@Gloom_Shroom_Gamingyou see how much the opponent time drop just because he was adjusting it? But I guess you not wrong since it a friendly game.
chess piece: * moves to white squares *
checkers: * confused screaming *
The random illegal move that no one questions because of time trouble is great.
Specify the move so that we may address it in the comments.
@@robertveith6383 the backwards capture from the checker
Never mind the fact that the Checkers player started with four extra pieces. What a cheater!
@@E-102_Gamma I somehow didn't even notice lol
@@kylegrefe4399 some checker variations do allow pieces to capture backwards though
2:00 i dont think you can move backwards unless its a king but you haven't promoted one checker to a king yet
That’s what I thought lol
Depends on what variation are you playing, chekers variate a lot in diferent countries.
Theres one or multiple variations where you can move backwards.
The standard rule is that you CAN move backward if you are capturing a piece
@@urbainleverrier1 No, it is not. Standard Checkers, AKA Draughts, does not allow a backwards move of any kind unless the moving piece is a king. There may be variations of Checkers that allow it, but standard Checkers does not.
@@hypercubemaster2729 I guess I'm wrong then...? That was the checkers I grew up with, we even had tournaments here with that exact rule, maybe our checkers is just a variation
Turns out, playing chess vs checkers is exactly what it looks like
A fight between humans and roombas
Underrated comment.
You sir deserve 5k likes LOL
So basically the pawn being taken was a toddler tripping over a roomba
The white square bishop being basically inmortal: 🗿
Checkers would be interesting to have as a piece included in your starting chess pieces (like maybe you replace the knights or bishops, or you play with a 10x10 board), but a whole board of them makes it next to impossible to checkmate the king, since they can stand on the other color squares.
I mean you Kinda have that in chinese chess as the Canon - its fun :D
I liked this variant of chess combined with checkers: ruclips.net/video/l-yWZaPrpcU/видео.html
Some Buffs I might suggest:
Bishops could have the ability to move (but not capture) one space orthogonally, giving them the ability to attack on both colors.
The Checkers player, rather than placing the chips on one color on the three starting ranks, completely fills those ranks with chips, thereby having chips on both colors.
No calling checks or checkmate.
The Checkers player can perform en passant, but unlike pawns, they jump 2 spaces diagonally over the threatened space the pawn jumped over when capturing. This En Passant move cannot be chained with any other capture, it must only be used to capture that pawn.
While the chess player loses when the king is captured as per usual, the checkers player loses if all of the chips are gone.
If all the chips on one color are gone and the king manages to move to said color, immediate stalemate
why would you buff chess?
@@tubegerm6732 it's a buff made solely for this variant
@@navyntune8158 That would only be useful for the white bishop since the white bishop can't do anything, but even when you take that into account, overall checkers are MUCH weaker, even with chess having 1 useless piece it's still far stronger, imo checkers needs a buff instead lmao
@@name2865-n2y alright hold on I'm editing my comment for a bit
@@navyntune8158 yeah, but chess is already op. even if you included your buff to checkers, and not your bishop buff, there's no way that checkers would ever win.
I think something like this could really be expanded upon.
I think they should allow checkers to en passant light squares pieces to make it more fair
Checkers would need to be buffed and chess needs to be nerfed.
Maybe letting checkers capture like pawns once per turn.
The knight is OP, it can sit on a light square and attack dark squares hoping over pieces, maybe have the pattern changed to 2 squares in one dimension.
Take out the light square bishop.
The king and queen has to be always on dark squares.
I like the idea of adding them on the 3rd rank of the board on dark squares, making the opening chaotic, and then having them the ability to not only jump over friendly pieces but also check the king even if the king isnt even anywhere near the checkers piece if its positioned in a way that allows it. If they promote they essentially become sort of a side grade to the bishop.
I thought about starting with checkers on light and dark squares, the same area as the chess side. Someone also mentioned kinged checkers being able to move 1 square in any direction or just to change square-color. Also, apparently according to checkers' rules you can capture up, down, left or right -- simply that in checkers an opponent would never be on a light square. Combine these with the ability to multijump-capture and they might stand a chance.
Having the checkers player start with three solid ranks of pieces, instead of 4 ranks of dark square pieces, is the most obvious first step. From there you can add further tweaks depending on how balanced it is.
"The checkers player is at a slight disadvantage"
Ah yes, the “what the fuck are you doing” gambit
I love how is (At least) a forced draw if you let your king in a white square
This is how 200 elo players learn chess
Dr disrespect after the minors drama:
"your play chess and i am playing checkers"
When you have lost half your set of chess and checkers but still want to play:
Bishop and Queen kind rule this game. Being able to threaten multiple pieces at once is really good.
plus the fact you cant take the king as checkers players, since it just sits on light squares
Exquisite gameplay between both grandmasters. Amazing indeed, I wish for more of these type of games being played over the top tournament.
i bombed my neighbours
Ajajaja
Долгожданное обновление в шахматах, они сделали колоборацию с шашками
Кроссовер тысячелетия
Согл
Пон
Checker pieces aren’t allowed to jump backwards until they’ve been kinged.
At least the checkers player was still able to hold his own to a degree. He was able to get a couple chess pieces from the opponent.
We actually tried this last night on a whim. I figured that other people would have tried and here we are😂 we did remove so chess pieces to make the number of pieces equal
My favorite part is that the king can just stay on white or on the edges and the game just becomes completely unwinable for checkers.
You even got it down to the limp handshake, congratulations! 😄
Basically a set of chess pieces vs a bunch of bishops
I love how both of them are using different rules but somehow it becomes an actual working match-
The white Bishop be like-
Kill me if you can! 😂😂😂
The checkers guy broke the rules, only kinged pucks can move backward
the light squared bishop is me during group activities
Hi, I am a game designer, here is my advice: Chess side is significantly stronger than the other. To achieve balance, the following solutions can be considered (choose one):
1, The checkers side can move twice in one turn, and all pieces can jump backward to capture from the start.
2, The chess side loses if three pieces are captured (the king's capture results in an immediate loss).
3, The chess side only has a king and a queen.
4, The chess side's back row consists of four bishops on black squares and one king (the bishops on white squares are invulnerable but have no meaningful presence).
5, The chess side must capture all of the opponent's pieces within 30 moves, or they lose.
This thing will reappear randomly in 10 yrs mark my words
i just love how it is impossible for the king to be checkmated if he just stays on its staring square, or any light square
1:16 bro I died when the checkers dude did not play En Passant
This entire concept made me laugh that throat-scratchy laugh out loud once but at a good audible level.
the light squared bishop was there for a participation reward
Truly one of the games of all time
2:00 You can't move your checker backwards until you have it reach the end.
I guess chess can just promote pawns whenever, too
Depends on which rules you are playing, in my country's rules you can
@@Sora_3347 Ah ok
It depends on the rules you are using for example in my country "Brazil" it can kill the piece backwards
Not me expecting an en passant after that third move 😂
Everybody gangsta until the queen kicks in😂
bro hit the most illegal checkers move and went backwards 😭😭
If you want to give checkers a leg up since chess _easily_ destroys it, you could say that checkers can jump pieces sideways and/or vertically, just as long as there's still an empty square on the other side. I'd only do it sideways, but that's just me.
With one minute timer it ended up being a who can move faster challenge; but the chess pieces are so much more powerful than the checker pieces it's not a battle it's a slaughter.
Well, the thing that makes it a slaughter is the fact that it's straight up impossible for the checker player to win as they cant capture on white titles, so as long as the king is moved onto a white tile the best the checker player can do is draw the game.
Very cool concept. Earlier I tried this with myself but with a fourth row of checkers pieces and that same amount of checkers pieces on dark and light squares (32 total) vs chess without a queen. Even then checkers never stood close of a chance against chess pieces
No way doubling the pieces vs no Queen is still a lose! LOL
Да, шашки не смогут,- но смогут - Дамки(но они ходят только по чёрным, почти как шахматные слоны).🤷♂️🤔
Woah, hold on! Illegal move! Player black jumped a piece backwards!
Dang the bishop in the white squares went on vacation
That was so fast bro, good work to both of you
If you ever feel useless remember the light square bishop
0:20 I wanted that checker on G5 to move to H6 and en passant that pawn so bad
The white bishop casually reading a book as war rages on around him.
I remember playing checkers against a kid at my old school who was really good, I was so confused I didn't even win a single game.
1:43 That move from the chess player was wrong. You can't beat checker when another stands behind it.
It kills me that this doesn't end with the checker player saying "king me" and the chess player putting the king'ed checker into checkmate
*THE ELEPHANT WHO WALKS ONLY ON WHITE* 🗿
0:16 He could've used the en passant move here
Rules to make this a fair game:
1: Checkers pieces can capture vertically or horizontally.
2: Checkers pieces when promoting to king moves like a king, 1 square in any direction including cardinally.
3: Checkers pieces can kamikaze and jump off the board when capturing.
4: Checkers piece can jump off the board, land on an imaginary square, and come back onto the board while capturing another piece.
5: if the king is captured checkers win.
Note: the word you're looking for in regards to both horizontal and vertical movement is orthogonal.
@@olivewooled1297 I am aware of the existence of the word orthogonal, unfortunately I do not care
@@lifinale based
What is the point of making it fair? The point of the whole comparison will cease to exist.
@@kingol4801This is for people who want to make it fair. If you don’t want it, then how about you do the most sensible thing: ignore it
2:00 since when can checker pieces move back before they get crowned.
I know that there are at least 2 different rule sets for checkers, but ones i played as a kid you couldn't move back but you could take opponents piece in any direction even if it moves you back
He didn’t move back dry he captured back
Да, именно этого мне не хватало в час ночи
We got chess vs checkers before GTA VI
This is literally the best thing I’ve ever seen 😂🤣
someone did checkers vs chess but the checkers can go on light squares and can loop over to prevent the king from just staying on a light square
Это гениально, каждая из сторон имеет свои преимущества и недостатки
No, the chess pieces have a huge advantage if they go in white squares.
Это лучшая партия ,которую я видел
Checkers definitely at a disadvantage here.
light squared bishop: why are we still here 💀💀💀
Wow! Chess modding community is insane!
Combine go with checkers and add a few pieces, then edit a few rules, and suddenly it's pretty fair. I'm currently working on balancing these games against each other (along with xianqi and shogi).
From what I understand playing shogi, shogi is like chess but you can resurrect pieces
@@novarender_ shogi is like chess but 10x more confusing
Someone already tried balancing Shogi & XiangQi so it can fight Fabulous FIDEs (Chess)
Look up Shinobi & Synochess in Pychess
If you have to balance it then there is no point.
If you ever feel useless, just remember the white bishop in chess vs checkers
We should never forget the Great Chessadion- Checkerian war.
Truly a deadly war.
Now thats what i call " FUCKING GENIUS ! "
This sounds impossible for checkers, if you can get in a position with all on white spaces except 4 on the back line to avoid checker's kinging, then a rook can blaze down one side, round the back, and you're at a huge advantage just in numbers while knowing a piece is only in danger if you move it over to black, which you can guarantee a trade for.
That said, its a cool idea and with some balance it could be fun, like the custom all knight gamemode or something.
Edit: in fact because you can't take backwards unless kinged, the rook getting to the back line means it can take everything for free. Queen does the same. Literally just open up Queen, go diagonal as far as you can, then up the side and take everything.
0:15 They missed en passant (◞ ‸ ◟ㆀ)
How many points is one checkers piece?
1
Lol that queen charging through the ranks 😅😅
Checkers:
- Can not move to white
- Can not capture anything they can't jump over, while they can be captured at the same time
- Are forced to capture whenever possible
So good luck fighting chess pieces which have none of these restrictions.
2:00 when was the checkers piece kinged?
oh fr
White's objective is to checkmate black's king (this is the goal in chess) but there is no black's king. Black's objective is to take all white's pieces (this is the goal in checkers) but white's white bishop is invincible. The only way this game could end is when one player runs out of time. This is what actually happened.
checkers player wants to take the king and chess player wants to remove all of Black's pieces. I assume it works like that. I'm not going to pretend that's balanced though
My version of the rules say that the objective for black is to stalemate white (since a king on a white square is immortal), while white’s objective is to capture all of black’s checkers.