@@Pixlewatchtoo I doubt the story is real, but allegedly it did learn to figure it out in a unique manner apparently it tricked a human to do it for them but again I don’t think the story is actually real, but it does show the potential for something like that
“I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.” - Joanna Maciejewska
The fact that the AI content creator invented a game called "human or robot" and didn't call it "bot or not" tells me that we have nothing to worry about.
Like they said in the vid, they're mostly sexualised female characters, it's not hard to see the appeal there. for the rest that don't use it for 'that' reason, I don't know the appeal
You could notice by looking at colors. 1- one has this weird line and colors on her face are all over the palce (also her eyers) 2 - in this one just look at her clothes, those colors look digital, not realistic (also you could look simply at the background and notice that it is so badly done, one car seat has back way higher then the other, windows are in weird places, shadows don't make sense) 2.1 -again colors on her face are bad 2.2 - her eyes are looking in different directions 2.3 - her hair are clipping into the side of her face or magickly she developed sideburns
companies will do whatever possible just to avoid paying ppl 😭 at one point in the video a quote almost sounded like "we can finnaly have a diverse model without having to pay ppl of colour"
“We can’t be held responsible for what our AI says or does,” so basically accountability is just going right out the window for deceptive marketing practices. Cool, cool, like I wasn’t already being lied to enough.
Usually I can tell the difference between AI and real life because of small mistakes like deformed hands, uncanny facial expressions, lighting, and backgrounds but these days they are beginning to look a little TOO real. When they said robots would take over, this is not what I thought they'd mean 💀
A 3-D, detailed character isn't going to have the same pitfalls as a randomly made 2-D image. These influencers are like hyper-realistic video game characters, minus the actors and motion capture.
Miquela and other projects are obviously CGI characters. The lighting looks very fake in most images. Animations also look unnatural. However, day by day, it becomes harder for the untrained eye to notice the pitfalls of CGI and AI in our current times.
Miquela and Shudu are indeed both CGI. Not AI. Not sure why she used those at the beginning and called that "AI". That said, with both the exponential progress of both skin texture accuracy as well as AI image generation, yeah the technology is really growing and making it easier than ever for even hobbyists to create almost-perfect realism.
@@KaliadderExperiments 4K image textures is what is doing it. Used to be that CGI used only 1K images, but now the CGI programs can utilize 4K and higher UV image maps, and if the character is essentially painted so there is no seam it becomes nearly impossible to tell at that level of detail.
If anyone keeps watching it, it's kind of on them. That's what some gaming channels do already although some actually provide original content I'm sure.
Sooooo glad Style Theory did an episode on AI, all the deepfake stuff is honest to god really scary. What irks me is the fact that, for the most part, consumers don’t WANT AI shoved into every product, but somehow every CEO seems to think that we do, and then forces consumees to go through a complicated opt-OUT process for their stuff to not get fed into an AI THAT NO ONE WANTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. *cough cough* META *cough cough*
This is quite worrying indeed. An AI revolution would be catastrophic especially for those of us who value the authenticity of human connection. Society needs to be made aware of this to ensure they are mindful of the implications.
It's not surprising to me, I definitely don't like it but it seemed like the next logical step. I'm not planning on watching any AI creators and there will still be non-AI creators, just like we still have books even though movies are a thing.
@@banana9347 I mean sure, but the dude posted like every day if not multiple times a day if I'm not mistaken. With any integrity he could've said that he would slow the posting schedule down and perhaps take on one or more sponsorships to cover the gap. But AI? nahh
- Here are 2 pictures. One is your locker, the other is a garbage dump in the Philippines. Can you tell which is which? - That one’s the dump? - They are BOTH your locker - I should’ve guessed that…
Being Autistic, I struggle to read facial expressions, tone and body language - the exact ways you can spot AI. I'm not the only one either. AI is an inclusivity issue, and I don't see this mentioned enough.
I'm autistic too, and guess what? You're gonna have to deal with it. Yeah, you may have trouble reading facial expressions. That's a given. You can't just ask an entire industry to cater to you. Some things will be harder for you, and you should know that. Of course we need to do better at disclosing what's AI and what's not, but an "inclusivity issue"? No.
We might have to contact our representatives if this goes much further. Not disclosing AI is just not OK - not just for us, but for kids and those with dementia too.
@@superluigidummy And besides, AI is getting better and mimicking human facial expression anyhow so this isn't even going to be a point much longer. Even non-autistic folks are struggling w/AI vs reality, as this video pointed out. It's an issue of transparency, not autism inclusion.
I just recently trashed Instagram and deleted it since I learned they were stealing artists images to train their AI Even though my goofy cartoons are simple, I should the only person who can steal those Then again AI isn’t a person so…. Really scared what is coming next
And the whole process to stop them from doing so is to go through a whole messy labyrinth, tell them the reason you don't want your images being used, AND PROVIDE A SCREENSHOT WITH EVIDENCE
@@foxyy2048 oh yeah I saw post on twitter about this mess; luckly if you are from Europe it's much easier thanks of our laws(got my request instantly approuved on insta just by quoting it and we don't have to provide any kind of screenshot, just reasons we don't want our stuff scraped) but the fb's form is constantly unavailable for most of us since the announcement(2 weeks ago) with no change or news about it so it's still a big mess >
They opened Pandora’s box, and even if the bubble bursts, it will be impossible to close to the general public. They did all this and scraped our creations and words because they knew they would get away with it. We need laws but the damage has already been done.
This is already a huge problem in the art/VTuber industry too. The amount of AI art circulating around and taking work from real artists or being used to scam VTubers looking for art done is crazy.
Ooooo this is just the tip. The Chinese AI anti-Ukrainian influencer who stole a Ukrainian girl's face is the most terrifying. This can be used as an actual Psyops. Please do a follow-up on this story!
laws are almost impossibly slow, never mind that in certain countries, there exist lobbyist who would love to keep AI going at max speed, so they can replace theire workers with cheaper AI and rake in all the money.
@@kennethnguyen88 At this point I imagine we're going to have to head toward completely overhauling that system. The rate of technological growth is exponential and laws are likely to only get further behind with every step.
I feel like if AI is going to be used in Media (film, tv, gaming…) it should be used to speed up the process of creation (like reducing CGI rendering times) without hindering human creativity (the writing, visual designs, actors…)
Thank god for the theories channels actually proposing critical views on AI in the middle of this all consuming trend, we really need big channels like yours to push against the problematic aspects of this tech
I thought this was gonna be my least fave channel, especially with the departure of Matt Patt. But man I’ve come to like this channel equal to the others. Continue doing The Creators work.
To think, the movie S1mOne (Simone) was predicting this very topic, a mere 22 years ago. Biggest difference, in that film, one film company... or really one person... had total access. Reality lets the whole world do it. Then again, we are living in the age of many sci-fi concepts.
The plastic-y feel can easily be achieved with just the proper settings, light, and a camera lens. Doesn't need even photoshop. But you're right, neither of the pictures looked "real". Unfortunately, "real" pictures don't move product. IMHO, for years we've already lived in a world where you shouldn't trust a photo any more than you should trust a kid's drawing to be real. Whether the person in the photo is an actual person outside of that picture is pretty much irrelevant.
Way back when, if we needed evidence of something we could take a photo, because photos couldn't be faked. Now photos, voices, even personalities can be faked, and we need a new authentication tool.
Hatsune isn't AI though. The visuals are all cgi, which means someone actually made them by hand, and the voices are just heavily edited actual voices. Same goes for all other vocaloid performers. Most of the AI influencers here are actually AI as in their speech and visuals. Vocaloid is digital, not AI.
Yeah, Miku as well as all vocaloids and utaus are not ai. However, but have started to use her voice with ai, instead of buying the software to just compose her singing. It's becoming an issue
Thank you for bringing up that children cannot reliably identify ads. Even without AI muddying the waters, the ways that companies target children is disgusting. I really wish the COPPA update hadn't been so poorly written and uninformed.
Well, you can opt out by not posting it in the first place, that's been an issue for a while. If you're scared about what your photos are used for I wouldn't recommend posting them online, even just with friends.
I wanna point out that with these "perfect" ai models, it becomes tempting to wanna upgrade our own bodies with AI. Heck, I'll be the first to admit that it sounds cool on the surface, but there's also an arc from Teen Titans that immediately springs to my mind. In one episode, a near fully robotic scientist tries to make Cyborg more "perfect" by removing his humanity. I wanna go through the hard trials of life as a human and have ai tech just stay as a tool to be used for jobs we shouldn't have to do anymore. It's tempting on one hand, but I'm personally never gonna look up to one of these "influencers."
It’s too bad that RUclips doesn’t have a way to self report that a video is NOT AI generated. Right now the only thing a creator can do is select no to the question
7:25 "I guess I'm just thinking with my heart, instead of what's really important" Your pocket! That's understandable, since women's clothing don't have proper pockets (a topic already covered on the channel).
I believe, that, not only is it problematic that creators can be AI-faked, but also the fact that way, WAYYYYYYYY TOO MANY AI-generations make it past our eyes. Images, voices, edits and all those have led to absurdly efficient content-farms almost everywhere. Online markets, art sites, and RUclips channels have been infested by those content farms, and because the reporting systems of most, if not all of those sites aren't well equipped enough to combat unclarified AI-generations, be it via tags or direct mentions, they keep getting away with it. It is why i left DeviantArt among others: that site has been swarmed with AI-generations to the point of not being able to go one screenshot of the feed without any AI-generated images. And that's without bringing up image-searches.
Trick question, BOTH!!! Fun Fact: MrBeast does use some AI in his thumbnail production. You can see the influence in his face and in some parts of other thumbnails.
The problem with us being the defense is a lot of AI looks so real now, that we might not even know it's AI we're supporting. With AI getting better and better at these things, I don't see how we can really fight this properly.
I most certainly hope disclosing something is AI becomes the law sooner rather than later. It will allow all of us to make more informed decisions and that just has to be the way things are.
You guys should talk about the cons of ai like creativity... Is gonna become gone if they ever make it too much advanced because artists and voice actors are risk of ai.
I got a question… what about a theory on the best for bedding. Like kind of bed, kind of pillow, kind of blankets, whether thread counts actually make a difference, or something along those lines?
Honestly hilarious that I just closed out of one of those ai read script readings because I could tell the voice sounded choppy, but unfortunately it may not be so easy as things go on
I think as far as legislation goes, there should certainly be a tax on monetized AI content that will fund the “I lost my job to a robot” support fund. It should also be required to label AI generated content as such.
This is a fantastic idea! If they can't simply pay royalties to the artists and other human workers they're already ripping off, how about a registry where these creators can sign up for a support system?
@@NicoleDap-db9js Yeah, using that to prove A.I is getting better is complete crud, if you give an image of a tractor and a brick then ask which one looks like a tastier apple, I'm still going to answer your darn question and probably choose the brick.
This wasn't a style theory but it was certainly a needed awareness video. Also, did y'all notice that Style Theorists' comment was posted before the video?
Random person: "I'm 15% Italian, 33% Polish, 16% Filipino, 4% Nigerian, 22% Irish and 10% Argentinian" AI Company: "We could make a model out of it..."
There is a artist that has a signature on her videos it's a small black square on random places on the thumbnail of her videos I think it's a way to fight the ai
afaik, miquela (the model on the right) is cgi, so i feel like she is a bit similar to like a multi-manned vtuber, since someone has to edit and animate the model and such.
I am beginning to believe that transparency will be the most effective and resilient answer to a lot of problems we have. We need to question always why someone, groups, or organizations are not being transparent about the things they do.
AI telling you what shampoo to use to get your hair to look like theirs is the equivalent of a person putting on a wig and doing the same in an add lol
YOOOO VTUBERS AT 0:39 LIKE SINDER MONARCH (AmaLee) AND CyYu OH I DID NOT EXPECT THAT🤯🤯🤩🤩🤩🤩 this has *absolutely* made my day oh my god that made me so happy.
I would like to shout out DougDoug who also uses AI but using it as a tool for entertainment as compared to fully replacing entertainment for it For those unfamiliar, he uses ai with his twitch chat like "twitch chat and i infiltrate a zoo with ai" or using it as an experiment with a personality attached like "can ai solve a kid's game"
if it comes to the worst, it will not just be models. Artists, writer, (voice) actors,... Investors do not care about creativity or art all they care for is owning all the money in the world, so they can choke on it.
13:02 The answer is parents. Parents are supposed to pay attention to what their kids are doing. They should be there to control what their kids interact with. Also, I feel you should never give kids the ability to access money without supervision. We've all heard stories of kids spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on games without permission. That can easily be prevented by not giving your child a device with access to your bank on it. Or at the very least, have a password lock on the app store and require verification for in-app purchases.
Could you guess which person was Ai?
me trust
ur a great new host!!
I guessed the one on the right
nah
😅
i know that i'm human, after all, i pressed the images with bicycles
@@Pixlewatchtoo I doubt the story is real, but allegedly it did learn to figure it out in a unique manner apparently it tricked a human to do it for them but again I don’t think the story is actually real, but it does show the potential for something like that
AM ONLY HUMAN, AFTER ALL, AM ONLY HUMAN, AFTER ALL
@@PixlewatchtooAI can already solve capchas, capchas in reality follow your mouse movement to determine if you are AI or not
@@DarkAsasin16 Notice how I didn't say anything about AI not being able to solve them
The worst part is that the Captcha itself is a program, an AI that can recognize whether your answers were right or wrong, so it knows the answers...
“I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.” - Joanna Maciejewska
Great quote.
beautiful quote
Mood.
We have that, washing machines and dishwashers
As a storyteller first and foremost,if the ai can animate or draw for me better and quicker than I ever could then it's fine by me
Pretending to be inclusive while actually being the exact opposite seems to be a trend...
Disney
Always has been
Dat bad
A decades old trend.
When you pressure something on someone they'll find the easiest way to accomplish it as long as it works.
The fact that the AI content creator invented a game called "human or robot" and didn't call it "bot or not" tells me that we have nothing to worry about.
I don't understand
@@CuttyFllamBots don't have a sense of humour
Okay but humans created Peep flavored Pepsi and didn't call it Peepsi so, every system has its failures.
the information scraping data bot would like to thank you for your contribution.
@@ChefMonke07probably more a sense of rhyme is what they lack
What the heck is even the appeal of following an AI person?
My questions exactly...
Like they said in the vid, they're mostly sexualised female characters, it's not hard to see the appeal there. for the rest that don't use it for 'that' reason, I don't know the appeal
What's the appeal of following an influencer in the first place?
You assume that someone who is young and has access to their parents’ credit card figured out the influencer is AI before they buy merchandise…
because on the biological and psychological levels the brain doesnt feel the difference.
Despite not 100% being about style, I still think it was important for Amy to talk about AI.
Influencers have direct consequences in the fashion industry so it’s related :)
LIFEstyle
Style theory isn't just clothes
@@alphakowaclips Where does AI come into the equation then?
@@Pikawarps By this logic Logan Paul and penguiz0 could be consider style theory channels.
Gotta love how we're making technology steal all of the fun and creative jobs and not any of the boring or tedious ones...
Don’t worry! While the AI does all the fun jobs, we can do the boring ones! Yay to becoming factory workers!
@@phantomfeather518 at least we won't have anyone else failing to get into art school. We know what would happen then.
@@bukenator0788 what about an AI failing art school? That'd be worse
@@tortolgawd4481Roko's Basilisk
Corporate greed and A.I. what a horrific combo
I think corporates are interested in tech getting better, not because it helps humanity, but it will harvest big money.
Skynet
@@Zychel_EX9
Aperture Laboratories
Man...
Someone should write a book about that :)
Amen
I only caught that because I thought it would be a trick question... AI is too scary nowadays...
Basically cartoon
Mascots
I could still tell their both AI idk it was just something about them
@@thatoneguy9369
There was definitely something off about their movements
What's arguably scarier is the irresponsible usage/implementation by money-grubbing humans.
You could notice by looking at colors.
1- one has this weird line and colors on her face are all over the palce (also her eyers)
2 - in this one just look at her clothes, those colors look digital, not realistic
(also you could look simply at the background and notice that it is so badly done, one car seat has back way higher then the other, windows are in weird places, shadows don't make sense)
2.1 -again colors on her face are bad
2.2 - her eyes are looking in different directions
2.3 - her hair are clipping into the side of her face or magickly she developed sideburns
companies will do whatever possible just to avoid paying ppl 😭
at one point in the video a quote almost sounded like "we can finnaly have a diverse model without having to pay ppl of colour"
That's just messed up in every way possible
“We can’t be held responsible for what our AI says or does,” so basically accountability is just going right out the window for deceptive marketing practices. Cool, cool, like I wasn’t already being lied to enough.
Usually I can tell the difference between AI and real life because of small mistakes like deformed hands, uncanny facial expressions, lighting, and backgrounds but these days they are beginning to look a little TOO real. When they said robots would take over, this is not what I thought they'd mean 💀
A 3-D, detailed character isn't going to have the same pitfalls as a randomly made 2-D image. These influencers are like hyper-realistic video game characters, minus the actors and motion capture.
And too symmetrical
Miquela and other projects are obviously CGI characters. The lighting looks very fake in most images. Animations also look unnatural. However, day by day, it becomes harder for the untrained eye to notice the pitfalls of CGI and AI in our current times.
Miquela and Shudu are indeed both CGI. Not AI. Not sure why she used those at the beginning and called that "AI". That said, with both the exponential progress of both skin texture accuracy as well as AI image generation, yeah the technology is really growing and making it easier than ever for even hobbyists to create almost-perfect realism.
The animation does give it away, but being honest, it's been getting closer and closer.
@@KaliadderExperiments 4K image textures is what is doing it. Used to be that CGI used only 1K images, but now the CGI programs can utilize 4K and higher UV image maps, and if the character is essentially painted so there is no seam it becomes nearly impossible to tell at that level of detail.
That kwebbelkop thing is actually insane
Bro is trying to passive income his content 💀💀💀💀💀
Bruh was already making the laziest content possible somehow he stooped even lower 😂😂😂
No wonder Azzy left him 💀
@@cloudedfreedom6286 I knew I remembered him! Man, I loved Azzy’s content back in the day.
If anyone keeps watching it, it's kind of on them.
That's what some gaming channels do already although some actually provide original content I'm sure.
He was tried to make a factory content with ai is the CEO
Sooooo glad Style Theory did an episode on AI, all the deepfake stuff is honest to god really scary. What irks me is the fact that, for the most part, consumers don’t WANT AI shoved into every product, but somehow every CEO seems to think that we do, and then forces consumees to go through a complicated opt-OUT process for their stuff to not get fed into an AI THAT NO ONE WANTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
*cough cough* META *cough cough*
Because consumers don't want it - investors do
This is quite worrying indeed. An AI revolution would be catastrophic especially for those of us who value the authenticity of human connection. Society needs to be made aware of this to ensure they are mindful of the implications.
It's not surprising to me, I definitely don't like it but it seemed like the next logical step. I'm not planning on watching any AI creators and there will still be non-AI creators, just like we still have books even though movies are a thing.
I honestly can't stand Kwebbelc-kop. "oh but burn out" THEN TAKE A FCKING BREAK.
“But then I can’t make munny” Kwebbleprop probably
Boycott AI shills. They're traitors to humanity.
Ehhh, it’s mostly because of the algorithm, I think. If you don’t post, your videos don’t get recommended a lot but still, AI isn’t human. :(
@@banana9347 I mean sure, but the dude posted like every day if not multiple times a day if I'm not mistaken. With any integrity he could've said that he would slow the posting schedule down and perhaps take on one or more sponsorships to cover the gap. But AI? nahh
@@dvotion5819 Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't money pay bills, pay for food, pay taxes, and generally make the world go round?
- Here are 2 pictures. One is your locker, the other is a garbage dump in the Philippines. Can you tell which is which?
- That one’s the dump?
- They are BOTH your locker
- I should’ve guessed that…
It was very obviously a trick question
NINE NINE!
NINE NINE!
Nine-nine!!!
NINE NINE!
Being Autistic, I struggle to read facial expressions, tone and body language - the exact ways you can spot AI. I'm not the only one either.
AI is an inclusivity issue, and I don't see this mentioned enough.
Same here man. I'm not religious but God help us all.
I'm autistic too, and guess what? You're gonna have to deal with it. Yeah, you may have trouble reading facial expressions. That's a given. You can't just ask an entire industry to cater to you. Some things will be harder for you, and you should know that. Of course we need to do better at disclosing what's AI and what's not, but an "inclusivity issue"? No.
We might have to contact our representatives if this goes much further. Not disclosing AI is just not OK - not just for us, but for kids and those with dementia too.
@@superluigidummy And besides, AI is getting better and mimicking human facial expression anyhow so this isn't even going to be a point much longer. Even non-autistic folks are struggling w/AI vs reality, as this video pointed out. It's an issue of transparency, not autism inclusion.
@@superluigidummybrother he wasn’t doing that calm down
As a Dutch person I'm so ashamed that lalaland is a Dutch based company
203 likes and no comments 😅
"we're not targeting kids! we're just digging holes where kids pass"
if this is a reference to something specific I would love to learn more about it.
@@just-another-lunatic Not that I'm aware of
the only AI should be used for is as assisted tool to improve your work not to replacing your work
It will be replacing your work. Flooding everything at a rate faster than any human could ever produce.
I just recently trashed Instagram and deleted it since I learned they were stealing artists images to train their AI
Even though my goofy cartoons are simple, I should the only person who can steal those
Then again AI isn’t a person so….
Really scared what is coming next
I’m trying to get access to Glaze so I can glaze my images
And the whole process to stop them from doing so is to go through a whole messy labyrinth, tell them the reason you don't want your images being used, AND PROVIDE A SCREENSHOT WITH EVIDENCE
Facebook and Adobe are doing it, too.
@@ShadoeLandman oh yikes….
@@foxyy2048 oh yeah I saw post on twitter about this mess; luckly if you are from Europe it's much easier thanks of our laws(got my request instantly approuved on insta just by quoting it and we don't have to provide any kind of screenshot, just reasons we don't want our stuff scraped) but the fb's form is constantly unavailable for most of us since the announcement(2 weeks ago) with no change or news about it so it's still a big mess >
Unfortunately, this tech is advancing way too fast for any regulatory governance to keep up.
The fight ultimately comes down to us, the consumer.
They opened Pandora’s box, and even if the bubble bursts, it will be impossible to close to the general public. They did all this and scraped our creations and words because they knew they would get away with it. We need laws but the damage has already been done.
This is already a huge problem in the art/VTuber industry too. The amount of AI art circulating around and taking work from real artists or being used to scam VTubers looking for art done is crazy.
Ooooo this is just the tip. The Chinese AI anti-Ukrainian influencer who stole a Ukrainian girl's face is the most terrifying. This can be used as an actual Psyops. Please do a follow-up on this story!
how is this not illegal yet?
laws are almost impossibly slow, never mind that in certain countries, there exist lobbyist who would love to keep AI going at max speed, so they can replace theire workers with cheaper AI and rake in all the money.
money. and laws falling behind
Laws are still playing catch up with computers, phones, and internet even now. AI is just another one in the long queue sadly
Money
@@kennethnguyen88 At this point I imagine we're going to have to head toward completely overhauling that system. The rate of technological growth is exponential and laws are likely to only get further behind with every step.
0:39 - 0:48
omg Sinder,CyYu and Monarch!
Great Vtubers chosen for the clip!!!
I feel like if AI is going to be used in Media (film, tv, gaming…) it should be used to speed up the process of creation (like reducing CGI rendering times) without hindering human creativity (the writing, visual designs, actors…)
I agree. Ethics matter.
Me watching this: “Hey there’s me!!-“
*gets incinerated by a robot
“…..oh noo…..”
Reduced to ash
Day 2 asking Amy (style theory team) to make a video about best ways to pack things for a vacation
or the best things to pack
I can smell that that thumbnail was based off of Dot and Bubble, the latest Dr Who episode.
Oh my god I thought the same thing!!
Yeah felt a bit weird to see a a thumnail without the text.
at first thought this was a Yikes video😆
I thought the same thing lol
Privilege and Abuse of Resources are more similar than many would like to admit.
Thank god for the theories channels actually proposing critical views on AI in the middle of this all consuming trend, we really need big channels like yours to push against the problematic aspects of this tech
I thought this was gonna be my least fave channel, especially with the departure of Matt Patt. But man I’ve come to like this channel equal to the others. Continue doing The Creators work.
To think, the movie S1mOne (Simone) was predicting this very topic, a mere 22 years ago. Biggest difference, in that film, one film company... or really one person... had total access. Reality lets the whole world do it. Then again, we are living in the age of many sci-fi concepts.
0:03 both of them had a plasticy feel. I could tell since the beginning
Same I could also easily tell them apart 😉
🥲🥇
The plastic-y feel can easily be achieved with just the proper settings, light, and a camera lens. Doesn't need even photoshop.
But you're right, neither of the pictures looked "real". Unfortunately, "real" pictures don't move product.
IMHO, for years we've already lived in a world where you shouldn't trust a photo any more than you should trust a kid's drawing to be real. Whether the person in the photo is an actual person outside of that picture is pretty much irrelevant.
@@TheRawrnstuff however kids' drawings are real art unlike AI images
there needs to be emotion and understanding for there the product to be art
The problem is that just because YOU can tell the difference, doesn't mean everyone else can.
2:00 it absolutely terrifys me that not too long ago this question was mostly theoreretical.
Way back when, if we needed evidence of something we could take a photo, because photos couldn't be faked. Now photos, voices, even personalities can be faked, and we need a new authentication tool.
Gosh I remembered when Hatsune Miku was the only AI popstar.
Hatsune isn't AI though. The visuals are all cgi, which means someone actually made them by hand, and the voices are just heavily edited actual voices. Same goes for all other vocaloid performers. Most of the AI influencers here are actually AI as in their speech and visuals. Vocaloid is digital, not AI.
@@linklink3069 True, but I have to second OP's point of "I remember when things were just digital instead of AI".
Hatsune Miku is not AI '-'
The day Crypton switch to Synthv is the day you can call miku AI
Yeah, Miku as well as all vocaloids and utaus are not ai. However, but have started to use her voice with ai, instead of buying the software to just compose her singing. It's becoming an issue
Thank you for bringing up that children cannot reliably identify ads. Even without AI muddying the waters, the ways that companies target children is disgusting. I really wish the COPPA update hadn't been so poorly written and uninformed.
Can't forget that meta is taking all images and reels and training AI with them. And you can't even opt out.
Well, you can opt out by not posting it in the first place, that's been an issue for a while. If you're scared about what your photos are used for I wouldn't recommend posting them online, even just with friends.
WHAT😨😨😨😨💔💔💔😱😱😱😰😰😰😭😭😭
Idgaf how far this goes. I will literally pay for things to NOT have AI be in everything.
can't wait to spend all my life inside an Amazonpod watching instantly generated Marvel Movies with ads in the middle
Where you can't look away or blink during the ads
Things that make you want to just abandon the internet completely
I wanna point out that with these "perfect" ai models, it becomes tempting to wanna upgrade our own bodies with AI. Heck, I'll be the first to admit that it sounds cool on the surface, but there's also an arc from Teen Titans that immediately springs to my mind. In one episode, a near fully robotic scientist tries to make Cyborg more "perfect" by removing his humanity. I wanna go through the hard trials of life as a human and have ai tech just stay as a tool to be used for jobs we shouldn't have to do anymore. It's tempting on one hand, but I'm personally never gonna look up to one of these "influencers."
0:44 Cyyu and amalee!
12:47 is really odd to me because I was able to tell when a commercial was on since I was around four and it’s the same for a lot of my friends
Wow! Same as 15 turning 16 this year
It’s too bad that RUclips doesn’t have a way to self report that a video is NOT AI generated. Right now the only thing a creator can do is select no to the question
7:25 "I guess I'm just thinking with my heart, instead of what's really important" Your pocket! That's understandable, since women's clothing don't have proper pockets (a topic already covered on the channel).
I believe, that, not only is it problematic that creators can be AI-faked, but also the fact that way, WAYYYYYYYY TOO MANY AI-generations make it past our eyes. Images, voices, edits and all those have led to absurdly efficient content-farms almost everywhere. Online markets, art sites, and RUclips channels have been infested by those content farms, and because the reporting systems of most, if not all of those sites aren't well equipped enough to combat unclarified AI-generations, be it via tags or direct mentions, they keep getting away with it. It is why i left DeviantArt among others: that site has been swarmed with AI-generations to the point of not being able to go one screenshot of the feed without any AI-generated images. And that's without bringing up image-searches.
Thos is why transparency needs to be more important
Indeed
WOOHOO NEW STYLE THEORY (you can see little imperfections in the AI designs)
they are too plump lol not the best example
their eyes are always soulless
soon enough we will have real life lore where we have to figure out if someone is real or another ai.
Uncanny!
I seen the Mr.Beast chat bot being "Big Brother Zack" on my WhatsApp and I got terrified 😰😥
Trick question, BOTH!!!
Fun Fact: MrBeast does use some AI in his thumbnail production. You can see the influence in his face and in some parts of other thumbnails.
That is very bad! Ai killing creators!
The problem with us being the defense is a lot of AI looks so real now, that we might not even know it's AI we're supporting. With AI getting better and better at these things, I don't see how we can really fight this properly.
I most certainly hope disclosing something is AI becomes the law sooner rather than later. It will allow all of us to make more informed decisions and that just has to be the way things are.
0:40 SINDER MY QUEEN LETS GOOO!!
AND AMALEE AND CY-YU!!
0:39 let's goooo! Sinder in the Style theory video!
ZEEEEEEN
You guys should talk about the cons of ai like creativity... Is gonna become gone if they ever make it too much advanced because artists and voice actors are risk of ai.
I got a question… what about a theory on the best for bedding. Like kind of bed, kind of pillow, kind of blankets, whether thread counts actually make a difference, or something along those lines?
Honestly hilarious that I just closed out of one of those ai read script readings because I could tell the voice sounded choppy, but unfortunately it may not be so easy as things go on
The hammer colors are represents the different theory channels!:0
I don’t know how many last straws I can take anymore
I guess the customers have a big power to fight back A.I
Boycott, but they're ALL gonna.
lets hope enough of us make use of it
My ex-uncle tried to get me to start drawing NFTs bc I'm a digital artist... he's now an ai tech bro
🎵some things never change🎵
I think as far as legislation goes, there should certainly be a tax on monetized AI content that will fund the “I lost my job to a robot” support fund. It should also be required to label AI generated content as such.
This is a fantastic idea! If they can't simply pay royalties to the artists and other human workers they're already ripping off, how about a registry where these creators can sign up for a support system?
That could work. Something to fund them long enough that they can change fields and start up elsewhere.
If I were famous there's no way I'd sell my likeness to be used as an AI chatbot. I can't imagine what these creators are thinking.
0:11 Did he not tell the answer? Or did I just miss it? I was reading the captions and not using volume.
They’re both ai
@@NicoleDap-db9js Yeah, using that to prove A.I is getting better is complete crud, if you give an image of a tractor and a brick then ask which one looks like a tastier apple, I'm still going to answer your darn question and probably choose the brick.
You missed it
The second girl in the pink hoodie is an influencer that is AI. Her names misha or something
@@clownloops Okay.
I like this direction for style theory, looking into a broader discussion of societal topics that relate to appearance.
This wasn't a style theory but it was certainly a needed awareness video. Also, did y'all notice that Style Theorists' comment was posted before the video?
Ya this should of been on flim theory
One of the best new-Era Style Theory episodes! Holding my breath, now, for a @StyleTheory - @LegalEagle crossover follow-up
I never thought i would see Cyyu and Monarch been referenced in a Style theory video
2:06 callback to the legendary 1984 commercial! Chef's kiss! Slow clap! Chapeau!
Random person: "I'm 15% Italian, 33% Polish, 16% Filipino, 4% Nigerian, 22% Irish and 10% Argentinian"
AI Company: "We could make a model out of it..."
I knew you Americans have that hobby about your origins, but you're doing percentages ?
There is a artist that has a signature on her videos it's a small black square on random places on the thumbnail of her videos I think it's a way to fight the ai
there is no such thing as corporate representation its all about money
true
AI is getting real scary
So usually sucks at drawing hands. That’s why I thought the left was fake
They’ve figured out hands in the last 9 months
13:54 for example
afaik, miquela (the model on the right) is cgi, so i feel like she is a bit similar to like a multi-manned vtuber, since someone has to edit and animate the model and such.
I am beginning to believe that transparency will be the most effective and resilient answer to a lot of problems we have. We need to question always why someone, groups, or organizations are not being transparent about the things they do.
Kinda love how instead of ending with a meme, it ended with Ai's gravestone
AI telling you what shampoo to use to get your hair to look like theirs is the equivalent of a person putting on a wig and doing the same in an add lol
3:34
literally the emperor palpatine of AI, playing both sides
:40 Yo is that my girl Sinder? Cool.
Amazing video guys!
i wanna see the theory sqaud fight AI then matpat comers in clutch at the end with a kamahamaha type thing
0:39 - BRO SINDER! AND CY YU AND MONARCH??? LET'S GOOOOOO
YOOOO VTUBERS AT 0:39 LIKE SINDER MONARCH (AmaLee) AND CyYu OH I DID NOT EXPECT THAT🤯🤯🤩🤩🤩🤩 this has *absolutely* made my day oh my god that made me so happy.
OUR SCUFF TWINS I CAME FROM CYUU'S VID
I would like to shout out DougDoug who also uses AI but using it as a tool for entertainment as compared to fully replacing entertainment for it
For those unfamiliar, he uses ai with his twitch chat like "twitch chat and i infiltrate a zoo with ai" or using it as an experiment with a personality attached like "can ai solve a kid's game"
Doug doug is definitely the GOAT for this
How long until companies start laying off models en masse? Do you think that is where we’re headed?
if it comes to the worst, it will not just be models. Artists, writer, (voice) actors,... Investors do not care about creativity or art all they care for is owning all the money in the world, so they can choke on it.
0:13 I ACTUALLY THOUGHT BOTH WERE AI!!
14:29 the problem is that AI art is way more useful than NFTs
can you do a theory about hair types and hair care routines? i would love an episode like that!
Ai is scaring the heck out of me
13:02 The answer is parents. Parents are supposed to pay attention to what their kids are doing. They should be there to control what their kids interact with.
Also, I feel you should never give kids the ability to access money without supervision. We've all heard stories of kids spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on games without permission. That can easily be prevented by not giving your child a device with access to your bank on it. Or at the very least, have a password lock on the app store and require verification for in-app purchases.
Can't belive I'm here just because that one sec of CyYu & Monarch cameo in Theory Channel
0:45 are not AI. They are Vtubers or Virtual RUclipsrs; a content creator/streamer who uses animated model to make content.
10:55 "it can?" -the person running this account, who is now crushed by an AI flying train. RIP to them. /j
10:49 this train can FLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY