Thanks for making this video and now it's clear to me why we need tornado plot to analyse the sensitivity of the output to input variables. One small missing point would be to sort the category according to their importance in descending order, so we will have a plot with a tornado-like shape in the end :)
Thank you so much!!! Have been struggling to find what I was looking for, and here it is, finally! Thank you for being straight to the point - extremely helpful when running out of time :D
Good explanation, thank you! One question: shouldn't the 20 Mio. working capital go back into the cashflow in year 15? This seems how it was done in the NPV video...? Thanks.
Hi Can you explain the connections of the data formulas or provide a spreadsheet Please? I'm trying to reiterate but it's hard when I don't know how the data is connected. Thanks!
i have run it using STOIIP calculation, but still, I am getting the same answrs ( what imean when I have changed the variable for example in your case CW and S I have get the same numbers in my analysis and I got 59.7 for my whole NPV ). - seems bit weird for me if you can help please let me know how to fix this problem?
Very confusing video... The Original Chemical Process case is simple to illustrate the notion of SA. Please update this presentation or remove it simply!
Thanks for making this video and now it's clear to me why we need tornado plot to analyse the sensitivity of the output to input variables.
One small missing point would be to sort the category according to their importance in descending order, so we will have a plot with a tornado-like shape in the end :)
how do you organise them so that it to looks like one?
Thank you so much!!! Have been struggling to find what I was looking for, and here it is, finally! Thank you for being straight to the point - extremely helpful when running out of time :D
Needed this for a report, thanks a lot.
It was the best explanation I came across. Thanks.
Excatly what I was looking for! Very well explained.Thanks.
This was really helpful. Thank you so much for putting this up in public domain.
Thank you so much for doing a clear analysis and interpretation of the sensitivity analysis!
Thank you a lot for this video, it helped me so much. I have been looking for a good tutorial until I happened here
Although published a long time ago, this is a very useful video for the topic. Thank you. :-)
Quite helpful, Thank you so much
Thank you man! Really well done.
It helped me with my HW so much. Thank you! :)
Thank your for the graphical explanation. Is there a quantitative way to measure variable importance?
Thank you very much
Thanks a lot for this video! Really clear example for me! :)
Thank you
Thank you so much. Really appreciate the video. Helped me a lot. Keep up the great work :)
Great video, thanks.
this is very good
Very informative, I really appreciate it.
Good explanation, thank you! One question: shouldn't the 20 Mio. working capital go back into the cashflow in year 15? This seems how it was done in the NPV video...? Thanks.
Hi Can you explain the connections of the data formulas or provide a spreadsheet Please? I'm trying to reiterate but it's hard when I don't know how the data is connected. Thanks!
very nice
Help a lot
jump to 3:20 if you have little patience...
good job!
Thanks Man , Awesome !
God bless you!
May I ask for the excel sheet just to understand better? thanks!
Please see the discussion from an earlier screencast. ruclips.net/video/yb8a8QPUYCc/видео.html
LearnChemE I understand the finance part. I only want to see how you plot the chart and play with the model. THanks.
Hello, I am having trouble when doing the table. When I create the table, my NPV values remain the same in all the rows. Anyone had the same problem?
Thanks a lot
i have run it using STOIIP calculation, but still, I am getting the same answrs ( what imean when I have changed the variable for example in your case CW and S I have get the same numbers in my analysis and I got 59.7 for my whole NPV ). - seems bit weird for me if you can help please let me know how to fix this problem?
did you fix it?? having same issue
Very confusing video...
The Original Chemical Process case is simple to illustrate the notion of SA.
Please update this presentation or remove it simply!
thanks a lot