Why this is unrealistic: 1. Switzerland is a fortress full of mountains and bunkers 2. The Italian-French border is all mountains 3. It would be impossible for the French to cross the English Channel 4. The Spanish-French border is all mountains 5. Germany wouldn’t capitulate after losing 2 cities 6. “Paris Wall Built”. No need to explain why that is unrealistic 7. The Americans wouldn’t be pushed back that much after getting a foothold in France due to other countries units being stationed along their frontlines as well. Leading to a combined army that the French wouldn’t be able to compete against 8. It’s France against the whole world. They would get pushed back within weeks 9. All the factors of infantry, air, and naval would all be in favour against the French due to superior numbers against them 10. A war on multiple fronts would mean that France’s forces would be stretched out and weak 11. Even if France would have initially prepared for this war, I would predict they wouldn’t even reach the Rhine river and break through the border with Switzerland, Spain, and Italy. Before Paris would fall or France surrenders
They took the major cities of the strongest country bordering it and made them change side, ofc its easier when you have France Germany Italy and Spain against the rest of Europe, it's easier to push. Also this already pretty much happened in 1789, so learn history
@@Algeria_Editzbruh, it is not possible for France to fight with all these countries. It is also not that easy to take the capital of a country and have so many fronts. We are not in the Napoleonic wars, battle tactics have changed. still unrealistic but anyway
@Algeria_Editz furthermore, they weren't sanctioned by every country on earth, fighting a air war and getting bombed back to slave trade era, and fighting there own people in there own capital.
@@Algeria_Editzand if we're going to use napoelonic wars as an example, soain sint falling if they lose there capital, they fought the French till they fell. And taking a capital does not mean they will surrender, and germany would never surrender after losing basically nothing besides one important city. France does not have the navy to take on the American and British navy, your also forgetting about American bases, which make it incredibly easy to get American troops into anywhere in nato. And nukes are useless because they are fighting a country with one state having over 1000 NUKES, France is nothing to America. And France is nothing to the world.
Discord community server: discord.gg/Z9g8cu3NP5
Discord war game server: discord.gg/YwMXGjcpJs
Hope I see you there!
“How unrealistic do you want this to be?”
“Yes”
cringe
@@Algeria_Editz *RUclipsR TO FAN HATRED DETECETD*
@@invisiblejuggernaut1285 this isn't called a fan, fans don't criticize
Fans do, Criticize.@@Algeria_Editz
@@Algeria_Editz Yes they do
France would never be able to take out countries like Germany, Italy and Spain so fast and also they wouldn't be able to cross the English Channel.
Nuclear
Warships
France failing anyways
@@Algeria_EditzI mean uk has nukes too
@@NormalChristianFella I'm not only talking about UK with nukes, Italy, Germany, Spain...
And France has more Nuclear weapons than the UK anyways.
France has only sLightly more nukes and also they would get destroyed by their neighbours alone
They would still be able too take down Germany, Spain and Italy, but maybe not the UK
nice one, nationalist mappers are so good
Im damn Algerian
USA: Am I a joke to you?
they literally came
France would do way worse, probably would get Luxembourg and Belgium to capitulate but no one else
speaking of the military capabilities of france against europe, its 100% impossible to have this scenario happen
France wouldn’t take over so much territory. Their borders during such war wouldn’t even be close to what they conquered here.
😈😈👑👑
How did the Swiss and Litchensutein come here
Luxemborgan Harmonica player be like:
Why did 'Britain' become independent in Britanny? They are very different
Oh, sorry. I didn't do it on purpose.
@@Algeria_Editz oh ok
France wouldn’t be able to push that far and they wouldn’t be able to win against Germany and etc that fast
Why this is unrealistic:
1. Switzerland is a fortress full of mountains and bunkers
2. The Italian-French border is all mountains
3. It would be impossible for the French to cross the English Channel
4. The Spanish-French border is all mountains
5. Germany wouldn’t capitulate after losing 2 cities
6. “Paris Wall Built”. No need to explain why that is unrealistic
7. The Americans wouldn’t be pushed back that much after getting a foothold in France due to other countries units being stationed along their frontlines as well. Leading to a combined army that the French wouldn’t be able to compete against
8. It’s France against the whole world. They would get pushed back within weeks
9. All the factors of infantry, air, and naval would all be in favour against the French due to superior numbers against them
10. A war on multiple fronts would mean that France’s forces would be stretched out and weak
11. Even if France would have initially prepared for this war, I would predict they wouldn’t even reach the Rhine river and break through the border with Switzerland, Spain, and Italy. Before Paris would fall or France surrenders
he was too scared to heart this comment
0:02 pls music name
Kevin MacLoed - Failing defense
@@Algeria_EditzI know him! He was in BFDIA 12
Italy is stronger than italy irl wtf 💀
Actually, I would say Italy is pretty much strong
Bro Turkey is much weaker compared to Italy also don’t talk to me with that goofy ahh tails profile picture cuz I ain’t taking you seriously 💀
@@NormalChristianFella Turkey? He spoke about Turkey? When?
@@NormalChristianFella bro u litteraly play brawl stars what are you talking about ☠
What does him playing Brawl Stars have to do with anything? @@keremhakan5087
unrealistic lol
unrealistic
They took the major cities of the strongest country bordering it and made them change side, ofc its easier when you have France Germany Italy and Spain against the rest of Europe, it's easier to push. Also this already pretty much happened in 1789, so learn history
@@Algeria_Editzbruh, it is not possible for France to fight with all these countries. It is also not that easy to take the capital of a country and have so many fronts. We are not in the Napoleonic wars, battle tactics have changed. still unrealistic but anyway
@@epic.production in fact the napoleonic times in France wasnt so advanced, it was quite poor in 1789 with normal weapons
@Algeria_Editz furthermore, they weren't sanctioned by every country on earth, fighting a air war and getting bombed back to slave trade era, and fighting there own people in there own capital.
@@Algeria_Editzand if we're going to use napoelonic wars as an example, soain sint falling if they lose there capital, they fought the French till they fell. And taking a capital does not mean they will surrender, and germany would never surrender after losing basically nothing besides one important city. France does not have the navy to take on the American and British navy, your also forgetting about American bases, which make it incredibly easy to get American troops into anywhere in nato. And nukes are useless because they are fighting a country with one state having over 1000 NUKES, France is nothing to America. And France is nothing to the world.