I said it before, remake 3, and 4 with updated graphics and sound design and BC2 content as “legacy” content and we’re all happier than cows in free range farm lands.
This is all people say when anything battlefield related pops up but I don't see not 1 of you guys supporting projects like warsaw revamped and venice unleashed
@@KamanZ10 more than 76.00 percent of bf players including me are console players and not many know about these projects anyways the fact that we don't know about these projects kinda goes on the bf content creators for not making the projects known
64 players feels too little, 128 feels too much... but we dont gotta double it, we could do it with 80. Thats 20 squads of 4 players. thats a great number for like Golmud railway map, so you have more infantry along with the vast amount of vehicles
Why are we trying to change the player count instead of changing map sizes? Some BF4 maps were too big. Some BF3 maps were too big. If 64 players feels like too little it's not a player count issue, it's just a matter of all the action being too spread out. 64 players works perfectly on the good maps. Increasing player counts on maps that have 'too little players' just leads to too many players being focused into the few points of interest. The players won't spread out evenly. We know this from 2042.
@@KirklandShunk nah, people over react to it, at times 128 players felt epic, but just at times, because the maps were bad. BF4 maps have a better flow than 42. I believe 80 players is doable in big maps. because we also need them. The guys who complain about Golmud eing too large, is the same guys who just play locker and Metro... and thats fine, the game gotta have maps for everyone. I enjoy both experiences, the big open maps and the small CQB ones.. this is coming from a guy who played battlefield since BF2. 80 players might be a good sweetspot for big maps, while you keep 64 to small CQB ones.
@@RNeeko they were too big for you fella, speak for yourself, as I said, some players only enjoy the small maps, others enjoy the larger ones. Im one of those who enjoy all of it. Golmud felt like an actual battle with like 5 MBTs in it. great for those vehicle lovers, I just think that more infantry would be nice in those maps.
Dice will still be so arrogant that they will tweak something to mess it up. For example, “Okay okay! We WILL remake BF3 and 4 as love letter to players! But…let’s add some heroes so they can shoot lasers out of their eyes… and….put charms on weapons…aaand maybe zombies…”. THAT, my friends has been Dice since reveal of BF5
@ravens5288 I agree but personally for me it was more then fine having battlefield label on this game. It plays just like classic battlefield. The only personal drawback about hardline was that initially it supposed to be bad company 3 that I'm still waiting
@@antony1893 see that’s where i disagree with people to me it didn’t feel like a battlefield game, the vehicles were limited the maps had a different pace to them, and the gun play definitely felt different. Not in a bad way or anything just didn’t feel like a battlefield game, same with 2042 it doesn’t feel like a battlefield game. I had a ton of fun with hardline blood money being my go to game mode.
battlefield 3 venice unleashed was much more advanced and unfortunately it died anyway after a year. I think this BF4 mod will end in the same way but even faster. When it comes to Delta Force, I hope that they will keep their words true, but unfortunately so far it has turned out that they lied couple of times. We'll see in December.
@@MrSilk13642 oh people want to play those remakes extremely badly it's just that they want it officially done not modded reworks. now don't get me wrong I love modded overhauls and stuff like that but for older multiplayer games especially when this is coming out such a long time after the release of the game no one is gonna put the time in to download it no matter how easy it is to do.
I played the open playtest yesterday on a 12v12 locker server. It was honestly very refreshing to see that every weapon was viable in its own way. The future seems quite bright for this one.
Unpopular opinion but peak battlefield was Bad company 2 then it peaked again at Hardline. The charm, ideas, gunplay and maps for the specific times they came out was top tier imo.
I think BF2 and BF3 were the best, but I had a blast playing the Desert Combat mod for BF1942 (that really started the entire modern warfare craze long before COD). With BF4 there were so many added problems and not enough added improvements. The community also started to suck by that time, I had my fun with it for a year or so but it didn't keep my interest as long as BF3 or BF2.
I had lots of fun on Hardline. The hate was totally unjustified, and was mainly because being on the hate train was cool. Hardline was actually so cool
@@istoleurfaceha3527 It's a shame I went back on and the only PC server is ran by hacker admins that let their friends hack, I went in got a few high kill games and they banned me XD
I wish Battlefield 4 would make a return. What happened to the frostbite engine? The destruction is no where close to what we had in BFBC2, 3 and 4. This game was my paradise all the way from my school days, up to leaving school and preparing for the adult life of work. The EA team seriously must have fell apart or broke down because their ideas and past creations are no where in site for this modern era.
Most of the old experienced devs left after Battlefield 1, with the rest leaving after Battlefield V and some having already left since Battlefield 4. The good news is some of them have returned for the next game but the majority of the people that made Battlefield Bad Company 2, BF3 and BF4 are simply not at the studio anymore. A lot of them were some of the few Frostbite engineers who are very necessary to optimize such a difficult to work with engine. We saw the result of letting less experienced devs work with it with 2042. EA has also clearly filled the Frostbite engine with features other game types use like RPGs, sports and racing games, making it less focused on destruction and first person games.
….. what a terrible idea. Why not let them give an old battlefield game some “plastic surgery” and re-sell it to us for full price most likely. Yes please, charge me again for something you already made once before.
Oh for sure, those PITCH BLACK shadows still annoy me even after all this time. I've seen shadows in person irl, and they don't equal a black paint thrown about lol.
For sure, Locker is about as far away from a prototypical BF experience as has ever existed in the franchise. The fact that 80%+ of active BF4 servers these days are 24/7 Locker servers is beyond perplexing. The endless meat-grinder, COD-esque approach of prioritizing your K/D ratio is antithetical to everything that BF is meant to be. Metro is merely "okay" and Redacted is actually pretty decent, but I'll never understand why Locker got so popular; map sucks, big time.
@canman87 Locker only works with lower player count. 48 players is about as much as it can take without getting stuck. Nothing beats a game of Locker that has a good flow. But when it gets stuck it's simply terrible. Same is with Metro but it probably can handle a bit more players. Those maps were made when Ps3 & xbox 360 24 players servers had to work too. A lot of these old time comp players actually have played many kinds of competitive battlefield. There have actually been all out warfare scrims, with vehicles and stuff. Those guys really do know what they are doing
Please Give a Official Remaster port with some Improvement visual and sound, Add the offline multiplayer and Custom lobby with all weapon Unlock - just like how Battlefront 2 it was
I hope to see someone able to upgrade the games graphics lol would be cool to see my favorite battlefield game get modern gaming upgrades like better textures ect that makes the game look remastered
They need to remake BF3 with all the dlc , it had everything a TRUE battlefield player would want , from close quarters with good guns to armor warfare with all the tanks/IFvs/helis to straight up boots on the ground gameplay... bf4 is good but doesn't play the same as bf3 which was the peak of battlefield
No spawn protection? I never even noticed that existing lol, how about they fix spawns so I don't spawn and get moved down by bullets and vehicles within 0.5 seconds!? Take steps to prevent players from spawning directly into enemy fire pls. I know this will slow down the pace but that's exactly what BF4 needs, I won't get bored if I need to spend 30 seconds to get to the fight, better then spawning and instantly getting blown up or turned into Swiss cheese.
i don't think dice or whatever the hell they call themselves now should try to remake bf4. as they said in past years "tech is not quite there yet" or "brutal expectations" you know, tech they had 9 years ago but don't have now... they should stick to trying to cash in in whatever is trending and failing miserably like they've been doing so successfully in the last couple of years, because we shouldnt be sad, that's just how it works out sometimes
I don’t see them ever making a game like these older titles. They’ve gotten the vehicles all wrong, the guns don’t feel right, and the maps are meh (imo) in all the newer games. Even BF1 tbh
The AI bots are what made me stop playing 2042 even more so over how the cheaters plague that game. Bro the AI walk straight to you and Lazer beam you no matter how close or far you are.
What was the point of removing suppression???? It got me interested until I heard It. If there was something that needed to bem removed are thermal sights, both for weapons and vehicles. And include small arms damage to aircraft, boats and non-armored transports
Because suppression in Battlefield is never used as intended. Absolutely no one is using "firing and maneuvering" as a tactic in Battlefield. So basically suppression just turns into a bad player missed a bunch of shots, you react with perfect aim, tap fire, and recoil control but you still end up losing because your accuracy is only slightly better than hipfire and they finally got lucky and sprayed you enough.
@BigFry9591 I feel like Bf4's gunplay is a bit outdated, the game is over a decade old after all. I don't mean we should get CoD gunplay but just making the weapons feel a bit mire realistic by inproving the models and animations.
@@moritzrossbroich Just improving models and animations wouldn't change how the guns play. I'd say that that is within the bounds of modernizing the graphics. Changing how they actually feel to fire by changing how recoil works, or changing ttk would absolutely change the gunplay. But then it wouldn't feel like BF4.
@BigFry9591 I would say some changes to the recoil animations (that's what I meant) would benefit the game. Your gun being basically glued in the same spot while your optic is pretty much exactly in front of your eye feels old nowadays. Again not saying we need CoD levels but Delta Force has gotten a lot of praise for its gunplay and taking some inspiration from that seems fitting. This would also give opportunity to rework the spread mechanic which have little place in a shooter like Battlefield imo. Hitting yout shots should come down to skill and how well you can control the weapon and not luck like is the case with weapon spread like in Bf4 ir Bf1. At least that's how I feel
@@moritzrossbroich I'm someone who believes that skill should come from aim, not arbitrary difficulty. Someone could crank up the recoil to insane numbers and say "well, it's better because it takes skill to get a kill with recoil this crazy". So I'd say that keeping the recoil the way it is would be best. You still have to aim to get kills, and it sticks with how BF4 feels. Changing it just wouldn't make it feel like BF4. It would make it feel like... well... Delta Force. Can you explain to me how BF4 and 1 feel like it's luck based to get a kill? I've seen that a couple times but never understood it. I played BF4 competitively and it never felt like luck.
Sadly hardline plays and looks better than 2042 and the cops and robbers theme is with bf mechanics is nice, if only it wasn’t overtly hated and I think it would’ve had a stronger playerbase
I think 128 players is good but only in cramped maps like locker, thats what everyone wanted originally but we got big mps that made it feel like 64 players anyway
@BALANCEBF yeah but they made the maps too big. Battlefield needs to have some good choke points in order to make infantry gameplay good on big maps, like the snow mountain one
@@ulas-yalcin You're not wrong, but I don't think that was as much a design choice as it was just a product of when it came out. My thought process was that all three games are essentially modern or near-future settings, even if they don't fully mimic the gameplay from game to game.
Yeah, tweaking a few things here and there isn't really what I would consider a full-blown "mod", nor do I think it even qualifies as a project. I guess if someone wants to be overly-pedantic about it, it is technically modding the base game, but whatever. I used to mess with the .ini file in Command and Conquer games, but I never considered myself a "modder", lol.
I get having bots in off peak, but if there are enough players to have full servers during peak, there is no excuse for them to be there. We would prefer them to just remove ai period, but this is definitely an iffy road, could make or break the game for a LOT of the playerbase.
Call of Duty tops 500 million copies sold as Black Ops 6 becomes biggest release in franchise history when was the last time battlefield did something like for EA? 😂 was it not bf1 and it only did that because again cod.
I dont want any bf remake remaster or whatever cause they shopuld be 100% on new bf.. after new maps remade on 2042 im really worried about future maps... bf4 was the start of the end in design destruction aa redzone campiung vertical design and noone play obj on conquest.. they killed also rush gamemode that sould be the main gamemode.. killed inf vehicle balance and destroy heli flying.. so no remake cause that game was so overrated... good game but a step back after bf3 no way.
Delta Force is to dang buggy and I feel like everyone is cheating 🤷🏻. I deleted it! I've watched people teleport straight behind me or well not teleport but spawned behind me on my side of the map by my base🤷🏻. That and people knowing exactly where I'm and I'm not shooting or moving. Game sucks! Battlefield just needs to step up and make a good game and no more "Love letters" to the fans like 2042 was supposed to be🙄😔.
I'm sorry 128 players is absolutely necessary 64 players on these maps is boring. Running running running and you final get to the spot you had a idea about just to have doe ass soon as you get there from a camper. Then respawn running running running no action
Hardline is _not_ a good Battlefield. It's a game with an identity crisis. Does it want to focus on robbing or drug cartels? In this case, the maps are a bunch of unrelated areas that never really give the game a conclusive identity. Everyone memed on most of the throwaway modes, but apparently, they're now suddenly staples of the game. Hotwire... you guys have no standards. The campaign is another poorly written tech demo where the level design is a mess and they tried to use BF4's unlock system that was scrapped ever since. Gotta love the fanbase for quickly forgetting everything. That's all before we discuss the odd gadgets and redundancies like gun licenses when this game tried its hand at faction weapons. I also don't care what game it is. Be it Battlefield or it's own thing, it's an awkward game where there are just enough core problems for people to scratch their heads about.
No AI, period. Full stop, no bots, don't understand why this needs any internal discussion. It makes for bad gameplay and cheap deaths to literal wall hacking/aimbot AI bots.
Ahh yes the last couple battlefield titles have been shit so let's remaster bf4, which is basically bf3, because we ran out of ideas and Bec the modern bf is one of our best selling titles after bf1 and bf1 only sold that bc cod 😂 so you fan boys are welcome for 3 of y'all best selling bf games lmfao, which continues to prove that the battlefield franchise is nothing without cod and that Activision is EA's daddy.
Players dont actually want to play an HD remake of BF4 like they say they do. BF3's remake died nearly instantly, despite people begging for it for years. Also, 128p actually feels like a battle.. 64p is like a skirmish which is not as fun, especially in conquest.
I said it before, remake 3, and 4 with updated graphics and sound design and BC2 content as “legacy” content and we’re all happier than cows in free range farm lands.
Right and Bad Company 2 with Vietnam Expansion 1440p would be Amasing but it wont happen
Love this analogy 😂🐄
This is all people say when anything battlefield related pops up but I don't see not 1 of you guys supporting projects like warsaw revamped and venice unleashed
@@KamanZ10 more than 76.00 percent of bf players including me are console players and not many know about these projects anyways the fact that we don't know about these projects kinda goes on the bf content creators for not making the projects known
@@KamanZ10 considering I’ve never heard of this specific studio until I watched this video.
64 players feels too little, 128 feels too much... but we dont gotta double it, we could do it with 80. Thats 20 squads of 4 players. thats a great number for like Golmud railway map, so you have more infantry along with the vast amount of vehicles
64 players is perfect. Anything more than that and it ruins the flow of the gameplay. 2042 proved this.
Why are we trying to change the player count instead of changing map sizes? Some BF4 maps were too big. Some BF3 maps were too big. If 64 players feels like too little it's not a player count issue, it's just a matter of all the action being too spread out. 64 players works perfectly on the good maps. Increasing player counts on maps that have 'too little players' just leads to too many players being focused into the few points of interest. The players won't spread out evenly. We know this from 2042.
@@KirklandShunk nah, people over react to it, at times 128 players felt epic, but just at times, because the maps were bad. BF4 maps have a better flow than 42. I believe 80 players is doable in big maps. because we also need them.
The guys who complain about Golmud eing too large, is the same guys who just play locker and Metro... and thats fine, the game gotta have maps for everyone.
I enjoy both experiences, the big open maps and the small CQB ones.. this is coming from a guy who played battlefield since BF2.
80 players might be a good sweetspot for big maps, while you keep 64 to small CQB ones.
@@RNeeko they were too big for you fella, speak for yourself, as I said, some players only enjoy the small maps, others enjoy the larger ones. Im one of those who enjoy all of it.
Golmud felt like an actual battle with like 5 MBTs in it. great for those vehicle lovers, I just think that more infantry would be nice in those maps.
No this is not cod. Where you run and get a kill and die. And repeat. It’s not the battlefield way.
Dice will still be so arrogant that they will tweak something to mess it up. For example, “Okay okay! We WILL remake BF3 and 4 as love letter to players! But…let’s add some heroes so they can shoot lasers out of their eyes… and….put charms on weapons…aaand maybe zombies…”. THAT, my friends has been Dice since reveal of BF5
I'm gonna say it: Hardline was a good battlefield: gunplay, unlock system, maps, lots of content in dlc and etc
If battlefield wasn’t in the title people would have liked it a lot more.
@ravens5288 I agree but personally for me it was more then fine having battlefield label on this game. It plays just like classic battlefield. The only personal drawback about hardline was that initially it supposed to be bad company 3 that I'm still waiting
@@antony1893 see that’s where i disagree with people to me it didn’t feel like a battlefield game, the vehicles were limited the maps had a different pace to them, and the gun play definitely felt different. Not in a bad way or anything just didn’t feel like a battlefield game, same with 2042 it doesn’t feel like a battlefield game. I had a ton of fun with hardline blood money being my go to game mode.
@ravens5288 well yeah that's personal preference about gunplay but we can all agree that 2042 is worst of em all lol
@ of course, really hoping the next battlefield plays and feels like the old. We’ll see tho!
Mods are not remakes or remasters
battlefield 3 venice unleashed was much more advanced and unfortunately it died anyway after a year. I think this BF4 mod will end in the same way but even faster.
When it comes to Delta Force, I hope that they will keep their words true, but unfortunately so far it has turned out that they lied couple of times. We'll see in December.
About what did they lie?
Thats because people dont actually want to play BF3 and BF4 remakes like they pretend they want to.
@@ChernoPhil I guess he's talking about the cosmetics but that golden Direwolf skin is only in Chinese version as far as I know
@@MrSilk13642 oh people want to play those remakes extremely badly it's just that they want it officially done not modded reworks. now don't get me wrong I love modded overhauls and stuff like that but for older multiplayer games especially when this is coming out such a long time after the release of the game no one is gonna put the time in to download it no matter how easy it is to do.
not sure about VU exactly but I do know that Project Reality which is created within it is still going strong. Frequent playtests all the time.
This would make me so incredibly happy. BF4 was so so so good.
Hardline was the full $60 in the US btw
I played the open playtest yesterday on a 12v12 locker server. It was honestly very refreshing to see that every weapon was viable in its own way. The future seems quite bright for this one.
Yep, they've tweaked every weapon I think
Unpopular opinion but peak battlefield was Bad company 2 then it peaked again at Hardline.
The charm, ideas, gunplay and maps for the specific times they came out was top tier imo.
I think BF2 and BF3 were the best, but I had a blast playing the Desert Combat mod for BF1942 (that really started the entire modern warfare craze long before COD). With BF4 there were so many added problems and not enough added improvements. The community also started to suck by that time, I had my fun with it for a year or so but it didn't keep my interest as long as BF3 or BF2.
BFBC2 was definitely peak battlefield
BC2 was peak, if people played during those times then they would surely agree... Hardline though? Oof.
I had lots of fun on Hardline. The hate was totally unjustified, and was mainly because being on the hate train was cool.
Hardline was actually so cool
@@istoleurfaceha3527 It's a shame I went back on and the only PC server is ran by hacker admins that let their friends hack, I went in got a few high kill games and they banned me XD
I wish Battlefield 4 would make a return. What happened to the frostbite engine? The destruction is no where close to what we had in BFBC2, 3 and 4. This game was my paradise all the way from my school days, up to leaving school and preparing for the adult life of work.
The EA team seriously must have fell apart or broke down because their ideas and past creations are no where in site for this modern era.
Most of the old experienced devs left after Battlefield 1, with the rest leaving after Battlefield V and some having already left since Battlefield 4. The good news is some of them have returned for the next game but the majority of the people that made Battlefield Bad Company 2, BF3 and BF4 are simply not at the studio anymore.
A lot of them were some of the few Frostbite engineers who are very necessary to optimize such a difficult to work with engine. We saw the result of letting less experienced devs work with it with 2042. EA has also clearly filled the Frostbite engine with features other game types use like RPGs, sports and racing games, making it less focused on destruction and first person games.
….. what a terrible idea. Why not let them give an old battlefield game some “plastic surgery” and re-sell it to us for full price most likely. Yes please, charge me again for something you already made once before.
Fix the over contrasted lighting and I'll be interested.
Oh for sure, those PITCH BLACK shadows still annoy me even after all this time.
I've seen shadows in person irl, and they don't equal a black paint thrown about lol.
Luminosity to the max or reshade and voilà. Not that hard
I enjoyed Hardliner. The gun play, voice overs, game mechanic features, etc. Making it a DLC or a different name sounds interesting
Bf4 was bf3 remade...
Commander mode is great though.
Let’s hope they add the full auto M4A1 as well.
Oh...that's why you were playing BF4 recently xD
Finally someone who knew how to make A-10 a GUN with WINGS ;) Brrrrrrrt!
No Battlefield player who loves Locker has a "firm grasp" of what makes a good Battlefield game
For sure, Locker is about as far away from a prototypical BF experience as has ever existed in the franchise. The fact that 80%+ of active BF4 servers these days are 24/7 Locker servers is beyond perplexing. The endless meat-grinder, COD-esque approach of prioritizing your K/D ratio is antithetical to everything that BF is meant to be.
Metro is merely "okay" and Redacted is actually pretty decent, but I'll never understand why Locker got so popular; map sucks, big time.
As someone who loved playing on Locker, I agree.
@canman87 Locker only works with lower player count. 48 players is about as much as it can take without getting stuck. Nothing beats a game of Locker that has a good flow. But when it gets stuck it's simply terrible. Same is with Metro but it probably can handle a bit more players.
Those maps were made when Ps3 & xbox 360 24 players servers had to work too. A lot of these old time comp players actually have played many kinds of competitive battlefield. There have actually been all out warfare scrims, with vehicles and stuff. Those guys really do know what they are doing
Please Give a Official Remaster port with some Improvement visual and sound, Add the offline multiplayer and Custom lobby with all weapon Unlock - just like how Battlefront 2 it was
I hope to see someone able to upgrade the games graphics lol would be cool to see my favorite battlefield game get modern gaming upgrades like better textures ect that makes the game look remastered
Loved Hardline, Ghost! Would definitely buy it if #2 is released 🎉🎉🎉
If this is a beta I really hope this game has way more than 5 maps when it does come out for console next year
This is a PC mod, it won't be on consoles
@ I’m not talking about the mod I’m talking about delta force
@garrettbrysman2813 oops my bad
Ok but this wont be actually populated
hard to believe bf3 on consoles are having the servers shut down in two days and nobody extra is on. It's going to go out with a wimper ;-;
theres me right they in the chat saying C SNOW at 1:08
This is all we’ve been asking for since bfv
They need to remake BF3 with all the dlc , it had everything a TRUE battlefield player would want , from close quarters with good guns to armor warfare with all the tanks/IFvs/helis to straight up boots on the ground gameplay... bf4 is good but doesn't play the same as bf3 which was the peak of battlefield
0:07 - nice remade with this old bug xd
I think they will have problem with copyright or something like this I dont know
The servers will use punkbuster ?
No spawn protection? I never even noticed that existing lol, how about they fix spawns so I don't spawn and get moved down by bullets and vehicles within 0.5 seconds!?
Take steps to prevent players from spawning directly into enemy fire pls.
I know this will slow down the pace but that's exactly what BF4 needs, I won't get bored if I need to spend 30 seconds to get to the fight, better then spawning and instantly getting blown up or turned into Swiss cheese.
give it to me as it is with 2042 movement and better graphics!
thats it more it doesnt need
how did you make your sight smaller 1:01
You mean the dot within the optic? It's in the BF4 settings.
@@GhostGamingg no the optic itself
Why they keep saying remade or remake.. this is the same game just being modded .. 😂
I like to play battlefield 4 but Asia server already dead...
I just know this project almost 1 month ago
how can I possible to play it?
i don't think dice or whatever the hell they call themselves now should try to remake bf4.
as they said in past years "tech is not quite there yet" or "brutal expectations" you know, tech they had 9 years ago but don't have now... they should stick to trying to cash in in whatever is trending and failing miserably like they've been doing so successfully in the last couple of years, because we shouldnt be sad, that's just how it works out sometimes
No no. They will ruin all again. I hope they don't touch old series, until they fix the current state of the battlefield
@@Abdi_Akhmet exactly... they used bf3/bf4 lore to make shit bf2042 and now that storyline makes no sense and is all fucked up
I don’t see them ever making a game like these older titles. They’ve gotten the vehicles all wrong, the guns don’t feel right, and the maps are meh (imo) in all the newer games.
Even BF1 tbh
100% agree with Battlefield 4 Remade , BF4 the best shooting gmae ever
Just graphic remaster is needed, no other changes
The AI bots are what made me stop playing 2042 even more so over how the cheaters plague that game. Bro the AI walk straight to you and Lazer beam you no matter how close or far you are.
yeah i still play and really like bf4 but all this without a kernel level anti cheat i wouldnt be playing it
What was the point of removing suppression???? It got me interested until I heard It. If there was something that needed to bem removed are thermal sights, both for weapons and vehicles. And include small arms damage to aircraft, boats and non-armored transports
Because suppression in Battlefield is never used as intended. Absolutely no one is using "firing and maneuvering" as a tactic in Battlefield. So basically suppression just turns into a bad player missed a bunch of shots, you react with perfect aim, tap fire, and recoil control but you still end up losing because your accuracy is only slightly better than hipfire and they finally got lucky and sprayed you enough.
Only the effect on weapon properties was removed. The other effects like visual and healing delay are still present.
Bf4 with modern graphics and gunplay would likely be the most successful Battlefield ever if done correctly.
Modern gunplay? Gunplay should be fine as is. Just give it better graphics and optimize it.
@BigFry9591 I feel like Bf4's gunplay is a bit outdated, the game is over a decade old after all. I don't mean we should get CoD gunplay but just making the weapons feel a bit mire realistic by inproving the models and animations.
@@moritzrossbroich Just improving models and animations wouldn't change how the guns play. I'd say that that is within the bounds of modernizing the graphics.
Changing how they actually feel to fire by changing how recoil works, or changing ttk would absolutely change the gunplay. But then it wouldn't feel like BF4.
@BigFry9591 I would say some changes to the recoil animations (that's what I meant) would benefit the game. Your gun being basically glued in the same spot while your optic is pretty much exactly in front of your eye feels old nowadays. Again not saying we need CoD levels but Delta Force has gotten a lot of praise for its gunplay and taking some inspiration from that seems fitting. This would also give opportunity to rework the spread mechanic which have little place in a shooter like Battlefield imo. Hitting yout shots should come down to skill and how well you can control the weapon and not luck like is the case with weapon spread like in Bf4 ir Bf1. At least that's how I feel
@@moritzrossbroich I'm someone who believes that skill should come from aim, not arbitrary difficulty. Someone could crank up the recoil to insane numbers and say "well, it's better because it takes skill to get a kill with recoil this crazy". So I'd say that keeping the recoil the way it is would be best. You still have to aim to get kills, and it sticks with how BF4 feels.
Changing it just wouldn't make it feel like BF4. It would make it feel like... well... Delta Force.
Can you explain to me how BF4 and 1 feel like it's luck based to get a kill? I've seen that a couple times but never understood it. I played BF4 competitively and it never felt like luck.
What if EA didn’t kill Dice?
when is the warsaw official release date?
Sadly hardline plays and looks better than 2042 and the cops and robbers theme is with bf mechanics is nice, if only it wasn’t overtly hated and I think it would’ve had a stronger playerbase
bf4 best game ever
I think 128 players is good but only in cramped maps like locker, thats what everyone wanted originally but we got big mps that made it feel like 64 players anyway
I think it's the opposite. 128 player locker is stuck forever. It's the large maps that need more players
@BALANCEBF yeah but they made the maps too big. Battlefield needs to have some good choke points in order to make infantry gameplay good on big maps, like the snow mountain one
The second game im not intresting at all ( I'm grown up ) but for the 1st and 3rt. :)
Am I the only who wants a battlefield 2 remake?
That's essentially what BF3 and BF4 are, lol. I'd be up for a 2142 remake or sequel, personally. Titan Mode superiority 🙌
@canman87 No. Bf3 and 4 are closer to each other but nothing like bf2. Bf2 gunplay and gameplay is a lot more hardcore and methodical, slower paced
@@ulas-yalcin You're not wrong, but I don't think that was as much a design choice as it was just a product of when it came out. My thought process was that all three games are essentially modern or near-future settings, even if they don't fully mimic the gameplay from game to game.
@canman87 I just like and prefer the gunplay from bf2.
@@ulas-yalcin Fair enough. I definitely played the hell out of BF2 back in the day, so I get it.
please find a way to import bf3 maps PLEASE!!!
Maby this is the next BF ... .. . 3, 4..
What about anticheats ?
Why is this game named after the capitol of poland?!
Enough remakes,I want new games,NEW!!!
I’m confused, isn’t this just bf4? lol
Yeah, tweaking a few things here and there isn't really what I would consider a full-blown "mod", nor do I think it even qualifies as a project. I guess if someone wants to be overly-pedantic about it, it is technically modding the base game, but whatever. I used to mess with the .ini file in Command and Conquer games, but I never considered myself a "modder", lol.
I would love to see a Battlefield 4 remake. But I think we’ve got a better chance of seeing Obama third presidency lol
I get having bots in off peak, but if there are enough players to have full servers during peak, there is no excuse for them to be there. We would prefer them to just remove ai period, but this is definitely an iffy road, could make or break the game for a LOT of the playerbase.
No more screaming Karen’s on the battlefield would be nice.
Call of Duty tops 500 million copies sold as Black Ops 6 becomes biggest release in franchise history
when was the last time battlefield did something like for EA? 😂 was it not bf1 and it only did that because again cod.
I dont want any bf remake remaster or whatever cause they shopuld be 100% on new bf.. after new maps remade on 2042 im really worried about future maps... bf4 was the start of the end in design destruction aa redzone campiung vertical design and noone play obj on conquest.. they killed also rush gamemode that sould be the main gamemode.. killed inf vehicle balance and destroy heli flying.. so no remake cause that game was so overrated... good game but a step back after bf3 no way.
Watch EA DMCA the project lol
no thanks I don't want another call of duty, Id be fine with it if it was project reality
Delta Force is to dang buggy and I feel like everyone is cheating 🤷🏻. I deleted it! I've watched people teleport straight behind me or well not teleport but spawned behind me on my side of the map by my base🤷🏻. That and people knowing exactly where I'm and I'm not shooting or moving. Game sucks! Battlefield just needs to step up and make a good game and no more "Love letters" to the fans like 2042 was supposed to be🙄😔.
I'm 8 minutes into your dang video and nothing about how to get to or where to go for the BF4 mods that updates bf4🤷🏻🤷🏻🤷🏻🤷🏻.
Delta Force was an awful disappointment.
I'm sorry 128 players is absolutely necessary 64 players on these maps is boring. Running running running and you final get to the spot you had a idea about just to have doe ass soon as you get there from a camper. Then respawn running running running no action
Hardline is _not_ a good Battlefield. It's a game with an identity crisis. Does it want to focus on robbing or drug cartels? In this case, the maps are a bunch of unrelated areas that never really give the game a conclusive identity. Everyone memed on most of the throwaway modes, but apparently, they're now suddenly staples of the game. Hotwire... you guys have no standards. The campaign is another poorly written tech demo where the level design is a mess and they tried to use BF4's unlock system that was scrapped ever since. Gotta love the fanbase for quickly forgetting everything. That's all before we discuss the odd gadgets and redundancies like gun licenses when this game tried its hand at faction weapons. I also don't care what game it is. Be it Battlefield or it's own thing, it's an awkward game where there are just enough core problems for people to scratch their heads about.
No AI, period. Full stop, no bots, don't understand why this needs any internal discussion. It makes for bad gameplay and cheap deaths to literal wall hacking/aimbot AI bots.
It's only a server option. Doubtless most servers will not run them.
Ahh yes the last couple battlefield titles have been shit so let's remaster bf4, which is basically bf3, because we ran out of ideas and Bec the modern bf is one of our best selling titles after bf1 and bf1 only sold that bc cod 😂 so you fan boys are welcome for 3 of y'all best selling bf games lmfao, which continues to prove that the battlefield franchise is nothing without cod and that Activision is EA's daddy.
3 is worlds better idk why everyone obsesses over 4
I agree, I would love a bf3 remake with bf4s content and even some bc2 content and bf3s colors
Players dont actually want to play an HD remake of BF4 like they say they do. BF3's remake died nearly instantly, despite people begging for it for years. Also, 128p actually feels like a battle.. 64p is like a skirmish which is not as fun, especially in conquest.
I'm so done with BF , looking forward to Delta Force!! 😵
Clickbait title. Nothing to see here
as soon as i heard the word delta force i closed the video its such a bad game
i want to play with bots.
trash clickbait video
most overrated bf to date and the community is worse than cs.