Most BONKERS watch I've seen!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 34

  • @felo6035
    @felo6035 2 года назад +2

    Hello Dan. Thank you for sharing. While not my style, I do give Ciga credit for their originally. New and different things continue to expand our hobby and that's all good. Thank you again and have a wonderful weekend my friend 👍

  • @johnmoffat5402
    @johnmoffat5402 2 года назад +1

    The square case shape adds to its appeal, I am honestly blown away with how much this watch shocked me. Nice review mate

  • @neli5p
    @neli5p 2 года назад +1

    I like it ... and it's great to see someone pushing design barriers.

  • @clarkmeyer7871
    @clarkmeyer7871 2 года назад +2

    Great review Dan! I own a Cigna design watch in my collection. Will be looking for this one when they come out. Typically don’t like “square” shaped watches, this one with the 3 different shapes looks very fun. Lume looks good too. Hard to read, yet still unique and definitely a discussion starter. Keep up the good work. Always appreciated. Clark

  • @nickmorgan2990
    @nickmorgan2990 Год назад +1

    Love it and want to add one to my collection of 3 of them !!! 😂

  • @arjunprathap4200
    @arjunprathap4200 Год назад +2

    I like it!

  • @SpaceG95
    @SpaceG95 2 месяца назад

    Saw your review on AliEx. Super cool watch!

  • @0040636bf109e
    @0040636bf109e 2 года назад

    Interesting video showing the possible future of watch design. Actually I was looking at a vlogger buying watches in Dubai and they were in the hundreds of thousands, this watch could almost keep up with some of the designs.

  • @jananders1351
    @jananders1351 2 года назад +1

    If it was wearable AND if you could actually use it to tell the time it would be an amazing piece to own. As is, it's a really interesting idea but not something I could justify (to myself) buying. However, thanks for doing the review, I really enjoyed your reactions to this watch.

  • @chrisselders3548
    @chrisselders3548 2 года назад +1

    Some cool elements, for sure. If it had maybe red or Orange hands, I’d be more interested. It will be interesting to see if Ciga or anyone else expands on this.
    Steinhart has a watch called the Apollon that has interchangeable bezels. I’m keen for it, but it is gigantic.

  • @SpaceG95
    @SpaceG95 2 месяца назад

    I agree that a bold design like this should not be a small watch. You don't buy a watch like this for accuracy or to fit under a cuff. It's a statement piece

  • @clarkmeyer7871
    @clarkmeyer7871 2 года назад

    Dan, what was the movement? In-house? Thanks

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  2 года назад +1

      They say its an "in house movement". Hard to find out if its based on anything.

    • @clarkmeyer7871
      @clarkmeyer7871 2 года назад

      @@watchmewithwatches Thanks for the response Dan!

  • @WesWatchRoom
    @WesWatchRoom 2 года назад

    I think unique is the best word to describe it, but sometimes unique isn't all that great, especially if you go too far with the design and forget the practicality. But I think Ciga recognises that and now just focuses on aesthetics instead. But for what it is, its a design showcase rather than a proper watch

  • @gazzertrn
    @gazzertrn 2 года назад

    Cant see the hands?

  • @gs8287
    @gs8287 2 года назад

    Alot of hate for this one haha, I dont think its bad at all, wouldn't buy it myself but to have 3 looks from one watch is cool. Shame the hands aren't more legible

  • @spring899
    @spring899 2 года назад +1

    I like your work Dan , bit all the UK watch reviewers are doing this watch too , undeservedly imo . Do something different to all the others, be different.
    The subs will come . X

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  2 года назад

      I think my upcoming holiday will be a time to reflect on some big changes I need to make....

    • @neli5p
      @neli5p 2 года назад

      Your channel is one of the best ... top 3 for me .... you don't need to change ANYTHING (just do more videos 😄)

  • @spicydragon3881
    @spicydragon3881 2 года назад +2

    Its an interesting design exercise and looks to be nice machine work, but what good a watch that cannot be used to easily tell / measure the time. The main hands are almost impossible to see and the seconds, "cog" is all but useless. For temporary fun maybe, for $600...No thank you.

  • @TinBin-Craig
    @TinBin-Craig 2 года назад +1

    should have made the hands a different colour so u can see them better..... not a fan.... cheers

  • @ronaldchapman2806
    @ronaldchapman2806 2 года назад

    A lovely watch but a bit pricy for what it is. Nothing at all "bonkers" about it. It simply has the face removed to show what's under the bonnet, or hood. Cool if you like to see the workings.

  • @davemck1887
    @davemck1887 2 года назад +3

    Each to their own Dan but they'd have to pay me £600 to wear it. I'm sure others will like it but for me? It's a confused no.

  • @jasonbostock408
    @jasonbostock408 2 года назад +3

    it's just terrible I have no idea why it's even getting good reviews I despair I really do it's a watch where you can not tell the time sorry Dan it's a hard no from me always great content but the sooner this thing is put in a dark draw under the bed the better

  • @Bigzy1960
    @Bigzy1960 2 года назад +1

    Sorry its not for me and I'm being too kind

  • @paul64774
    @paul64774 2 года назад

    Hey Dan. That is an abomination. Truly awful. 🤢
    Ok, I’m not a fan of skeletonise watches, (back is ok), but you can’t even tell the time on that. I mean, you’d need a loupe.
    Kudos to them experimenting with case changes, that’s a radical idea. But, that fact you can tell the time on it…… I’m out. 👎

  • @yusufbest4475
    @yusufbest4475 2 года назад +1

    Too big

    • @watchmewithwatches
      @watchmewithwatches  2 года назад +1

      I agree, a smaller variant with an easier to read dial would be amazing

    • @yusufbest4475
      @yusufbest4475 2 года назад

      @@watchmewithwatches
      Yes, the design is already shouting for attention.. I just think it would be more balanced with a more subdued size..