Affair On A TECH-nicality? Man Installs App To Support Accusations (Full Episode) | Couples Court

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 дек 2024
  • FAUDI V SCOTT: A Missouri man enlists the help of a cyber security expert and an interrogator to see if his fiancée of four years is using her phone to "tech-nically" cheat.
    Subscribe: bit.ly/2pX8WcM
    Follow Couples Court on social media:
    Twitter: / couplescourt_tv
    Instagram: / couplescourttv
    Facebook: / couplescourt
    Follow MGM Television on social media:
    Twitter: / mgmtelevision
    Instagram: @MGM_Television
    Facebook: / mgmtelevision
    Affair On A TECH-nicality? Man Installs App To Support Accusations (Full Episode) | Couples Court
    • Affair On A TECH-nical...
    Season 2, Episode 53
    #CouplesCourt #TheCutlers

Комментарии • 333

  • @honeybee4566
    @honeybee4566 5 лет назад +343

    Idk why but I never believe that lady who does the investigation

    • @jyavgn4154
      @jyavgn4154 5 лет назад +6

      deadass

    • @XJLR50
      @XJLR50 5 лет назад +4

      Me either

    • @NaomyP
      @NaomyP 5 лет назад +3

      LaDawn Kimble i don’t either

    • @zulu3274
      @zulu3274 5 лет назад +9

      Yup...I'm willing to believe the polygraph examiners more... Was there ever a case where they did all three?

    • @jeanettethrash3378
      @jeanettethrash3378 5 лет назад +5

      You and me both, because I think she is cheating 😡

  • @nikkidurham274
    @nikkidurham274 5 лет назад +662

    Stop using the interrogation lady!!!! She says everybody isnt lying. I don't trust her, I dont care what her background is.

  • @jaredhydell1081
    @jaredhydell1081 5 лет назад +335

    Dear CC,
    Please stop using the interrogator. She always has the same results for everyone and can see why she isnt with the military anymore. Stick to actual test that provide results.
    Signed,
    All your fans you let down everytime shes on the show

  • @steverl22
    @steverl22 5 лет назад +339

    Stick to lie detector test.....not the magic lady with the magic 8 ball.

    • @yellowflash2801
      @yellowflash2801 5 лет назад +2

      exactly

    • @patiencebright
      @patiencebright 5 лет назад +1

      Exactly

    • @Mehron74
      @Mehron74 4 года назад +7

      100% , no more magic * ball lady, .... I looked into her eyes and felt she was telling the truth, BS!

    • @BushidoBush
      @BushidoBush 4 года назад +1

      They both have about the same credibility

    • @contentiouscritic
      @contentiouscritic 4 года назад +1

      Polygraph tests are not reliable lie detection. They “detect” nerves and other bio signs. They are not used in criminal court because they are scientifically unproven. Notorious liars and sociopaths easily passed polygraphs, while innocent but sweaty or nervous people fail. It’s used in shows like this one because it builds tension, but you can tell even the judges won’t fully condemn someone for the results, they wait to see the reaction, and then they speak.
      By comparison this “lady interrogator” worked for law enforcement including the FBI and CIA, interrogating Al-Queda and Taliban terrorists. It’s her job of 20+ years to confuse and trip up interviewees and discern lies and force out truth. She is vastly more reliable, and her testimony would actually be used in criminal court.

  • @alexanderbemar2637
    @alexanderbemar2637 5 лет назад +138

    I do not trust her interrogation!?!?!

    • @contentiouscritic
      @contentiouscritic 4 года назад +1

      Polygraph tests are not reliable lie detection. They “detect” nerves and other bio signs. They are not used in criminal court because they are scientifically unproven. Notorious liars and sociopaths easily passed polygraphs, while innocent but sweaty or nervous people fail. It’s used in shows like this one because it builds tension, but you can tell even the judges won’t fully condemn someone for the results, they wait to see the reaction, and then they speak.
      By comparison this “lady interrogator” worked for law enforcement including the FBI and CIA, interrogating Al-Queda and Taliban terrorists. It’s her job of 20+ years to confuse and trip up interviewees and discern lies and force out truth. She is vastly more reliable, and her testimony would actually be used in criminal court.

  • @michaelreynolds6414
    @michaelreynolds6414 5 лет назад +84

    As i always say judges dnt cheat me out of a good episode

  • @X266.
    @X266. 5 лет назад +26

    I don't trust her especially when she tried to blame the children!!!! Something is going on in her life.

  • @Markvam1988
    @Markvam1988 5 лет назад +154

    She cheated we can see it in her eyes

    • @kristinamontgomery2955
      @kristinamontgomery2955 4 года назад

      Mark Vam no she didn’t i know her personally

    • @Reemmail.
      @Reemmail. 4 года назад +13

      Kristina, all facts point to her, so stop trying to protect her. Nobody asked if you knew her personally.

    • @Hannah-iz7nz
      @Hannah-iz7nz 4 года назад +2

      Let me get some tea.

    • @kristinamontgomery2955
      @kristinamontgomery2955 4 года назад +1

      Jacob Melendez how did she cheat when she has another daughter that is always with her ?

    • @kristinamontgomery2955
      @kristinamontgomery2955 4 года назад +1

      Jacob Melendez your funny😂

  • @limamoe9153
    @limamoe9153 5 лет назад +210

    This particular case in my opinion, lie detector is best option to solve this case.

    • @mattyiceMMD30
      @mattyiceMMD30 4 года назад +6

      She cheating the should’ve used it

    • @beanvo9924
      @beanvo9924 3 года назад +2

      Do you know that lie detector aren’t accurate at all. That’s why it cannot be use in real court.

    • @asamatteroffact9247
      @asamatteroffact9247 3 года назад +2

      @@mattyiceMMD30 They use this woman when they don't want to know the truth!

  • @alexanderbemar2637
    @alexanderbemar2637 5 лет назад +86

    I believed that she has cheated!!! they never asked her about those mysterious locations shows on the app, I believed that is where they meet.

    • @jeanettethrash3378
      @jeanettethrash3378 5 лет назад +4

      My sentiments exactly

    • @Kelsey1442
      @Kelsey1442 5 лет назад +1

      I believe that the guy who looked at the email and other stuff would have seen it if it existed

  • @Limitedonathios
    @Limitedonathios 5 лет назад +122

    When it's that lady (ms. sisco), i just exit out. I aint finna get any answers. Just a waste of my time, got all invested in the drama for nothing 🙄

  • @michaelreynolds6414
    @michaelreynolds6414 5 лет назад +39

    When they have that lady on here i feel like im being had. Its almost like they know the person is cheating and they save the relationship.

  • @funhaveatutti
    @funhaveatutti 5 лет назад +59

    She have an app where she contact some random men who pay her bills... in change of what ????

  • @313GearzGunzGaming
    @313GearzGunzGaming 5 лет назад +194

    Hmmm... where's the real lie detector guy at?? The ex FBI guy..

    • @XJLR50
      @XJLR50 5 лет назад +5

      Yea, Kendall Shull

    • @XJLR50
      @XJLR50 5 лет назад +6

      This military lady's technique doesn't seem to be enough

    • @tomswill9189
      @tomswill9189 5 лет назад +2

      For Real. My man Kendall. You can't trust this lady. That's why she on that phone all the time. Messing with these dating sites.

    • @jeanettethrash3378
      @jeanettethrash3378 5 лет назад

      Exactly

    • @jeanettethrash3378
      @jeanettethrash3378 5 лет назад

      @@XJLR50 you are so right about that 👍

  • @davidaras1086
    @davidaras1086 3 года назад +21

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen Sisco say someone was deceptive.
    And with no resolution about the pictures she’s still suspect,
    Not knowing what’s on your own phone?
    Ridiculous. Just another example of their faulty “full and complete investigation .

  • @kingkhoilan
    @kingkhoilan 5 лет назад +50

    Phones will continue to be the death of relationships...to much stuff at our fingertips

  • @ritchuk
    @ritchuk 5 лет назад +67

    This had all the potential of being a good episode right up until they brought in the "interrogator." I threw my pen across my desk. Please stick to lie detector tests, I know they are not 100% accurate but they are better than the apparent objective opinions of the "interrogator."

    • @jeanettethrash3378
      @jeanettethrash3378 5 лет назад +6

      You are so right about that 👍

    • @house2437
      @house2437 4 года назад +1

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @contentiouscritic
      @contentiouscritic 4 года назад +1

      Polygraph tests are not reliable lie detection. They “detect” nerves and other bio signs. They are not used in criminal court because they are scientifically unproven. Notorious liars and sociopaths easily passed polygraphs, while innocent but sweaty or nervous people fail. It’s used in shows like this one because it builds tension, but you can tell even the judges won’t fully condemn someone for the results, they wait to see the reaction, and then they speak.
      By comparison this “lady interrogator” worked for law enforcement including the FBI and CIA, interrogating Al-Queda and Taliban terrorists. It’s her job of 20+ years to confuse and trip up interviewees and discern lies and force out truth. She is vastly more reliable, and her testimony would actually be used in criminal court.

  • @NGross-ur2fr
    @NGross-ur2fr 5 лет назад +28

    Ugh! Not the interrogator😒

    • @negativeindustrial
      @negativeindustrial 5 лет назад

      N. Gross
      Miss Unscientific? You don’t like her?

    • @contentiouscritic
      @contentiouscritic 4 года назад

      Polygraph tests are not reliable lie detection. They “detect” nerves and other bio signs. They are not used in criminal court because they are scientifically unproven. Notorious liars and sociopaths easily passed polygraphs, while innocent but sweaty or nervous people fail. It’s used in shows like this one because it builds tension, but you can tell even the judges won’t fully condemn someone for the results, they wait to see the reaction, and then they speak.
      By comparison this “lady interrogator” worked for law enforcement including the FBI and CIA, interrogating Al-Queda and Taliban terrorists. It’s her job of 20+ years to confuse and trip up interviewees and discern lies and force out truth. She is vastly more reliable, and her testimony would actually be used in criminal court.

  • @macbeth5636
    @macbeth5636 4 года назад +1

    She was lying. You could see her tension. How many criminals this woman let go?

  • @energetic23
    @energetic23 3 года назад +2

    She's lying through her teeth

  • @inubaye2030
    @inubaye2030 5 лет назад +33

    I disagree with the cutlers on this.That woman is a cheater and ready to go anytime soon.

  • @sweetsweet81
    @sweetsweet81 5 лет назад +28

    She seems shiesty!!!! It seems like she's lying about these apps. I'll keep watching.
    Update: I knew she was lying about those apps. She could have just said she had them in the past instead of lying and saying she didn't know anything about it.

  • @malakiyahamari8448
    @malakiyahamari8448 3 года назад +2

    All he had to do was ASK TO SEE THE PHOTOS!!! He would've known if it was her or not! 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

  • @louisb0808
    @louisb0808 4 года назад +7

    Mrs cutler needs to be fair. Shes more lenient when it comes to the woman being accused

  • @andrewnehemiah3467
    @andrewnehemiah3467 5 лет назад +30

    Hey CC FAM!
    Ok can we talk! Now everytime they say he or she hasnt caught me doing nothing its been my experience They Cheating!
    😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @mattstorey7256
      @mattstorey7256 4 года назад +2

      RIGHT! When you aren't guilty you say "I'M NOT GUILTY, I didn't do it, I'm innocent." When they say "I wasn't caught..." I didn't ask you what you didn't get caught at, I asked did you do it. I didn't get caught = maybe, I asked a yes or no question, maybe isn't one of those.
      A court says, "Not Guilty" or "Guilty". They don't say, "the evidence couldn't prove them guilty, innocent."

  • @tommyshacklady9737
    @tommyshacklady9737 5 лет назад +14

    I don't agree she should of had a lie dector test done instead of a military integration

  • @jonathansmith8672
    @jonathansmith8672 2 года назад +1

    Wow! This woman is so despicable! She literally blamed her 4 year old and 7 year old children for taking that nude photo that was recovered on her phone?! I know it's a lie because there's no possible way a toddler knows how to use a camera or phone. And it's so absurd and disgusting for a toddler to be taking that kind of photo involving nudity. What kind of mother blames her own children, 4 to 7 years old, for taking a pornographic photo using her phone?!

  • @garysimmons3166
    @garysimmons3166 4 года назад +3

    She cheated on him for sure

  • @LrgPolarBear
    @LrgPolarBear 5 лет назад +38

    The judges are always pushing to keeping the couples together especially when the woman is doing the cheating. There are a few things wrong with this episode. 1 it wasn't a suspicious position she was caught in but a compromising position she was caught in. 2 If the coin was difficult to read and they were using the flashlight on the phone to look at it, why not simply take a close up picture of the coin and just enlarge the playback. 3. Who were those other men that were on her phone. The timeline that all 3 pictures were taken was the same (at night). And if it was a picture that she said was taken from Facebook of her friend who died. Then it couldn't be a picture but a screenshot. And 4, There were no further question about the addresses. Like I said. The judges keeps asking only 2 or 3 soft questions and never more harder question. Are they paying per answer instead for an entire lie detection session?

    • @breguet101
      @breguet101 5 лет назад +4

      Well done sir, remember the judges aren't lawyers, they are actors. Plus the show is scripted.

    • @LrgPolarBear
      @LrgPolarBear 5 лет назад +3

      @@breguet101 I thought that these 2 are real live Judges. Are you sure?

    • @aaronrogers4533
      @aaronrogers4533 3 года назад +4

      @@breguet101 these two both have law degrees from spellman, they have been lawyers and judges at different points in their lives

    • @sharcrum
      @sharcrum 2 года назад +2

      @@LrgPolarBear pretty sure they are real lawyers and judges. They talk about going to law school together.

    • @yumibean204
      @yumibean204 2 года назад +3

      @@breguet101 they are real Lawyers and the shows are NOT scripted. Please do some research. I do however agree that more questions need to be answered and that counselor is needed. As you heard Mr Cutler say. Don’t give him a reason to feel suspicious.

  • @graphictmedia8042
    @graphictmedia8042 5 лет назад +8

    I wouldn't accept that bs. If she not gonna take an actual lie detector test, she gotta go. The judges gotta know that this case is still suspect. Interrogator says she wasn't cheating, but there's no explanation for that “mystery woman” on her phone. Everyone just gonna accept that the kids did it???

  • @tashawilliams8093
    @tashawilliams8093 5 лет назад +8

    I'm not knocking his doubts on her being faithful, but if you have to constantly check and worry about your mate being on their phone then it's time to have a thorough conversation with him/her or just walk away altogether.

  • @samuelhernandez9931
    @samuelhernandez9931 5 лет назад +7

    For Me. I don't care whether you only contacted your ex or not, if I knew you contacted your ex because of an argument that we should talk through it, we done.

    • @charlesanderson1963
      @charlesanderson1963 5 лет назад +2

      Samuel Hernandez Agree, personality I have never had a reason to contact any ex I have ever had. We are ex for a reason. We never had any drama that caused our breakup, one of us just felt it was time to move on. Today people feel like the ex is part of the family, someone you go to in good times and bad. I don’t understand it. If I met someone who felt that way, I would move on.

    • @samuelhernandez9931
      @samuelhernandez9931 5 лет назад +2

      @@charlesanderson1963 true talk. It is just a crazy situation. You see married people contacting their ex. That's so creepy and weird. There is this phrase "we were on a break " excuse me?. People use this phrase as a defense mechanism so they don't feel bad for cheating. So they say "we were on a break ", even though you didn't want to be on a break, they will force it on you.

    • @charlesanderson1963
      @charlesanderson1963 5 лет назад

      Samuel Hernandez 💯

  • @dinashreedebbarma8338
    @dinashreedebbarma8338 5 лет назад +6

    Doesn't make any sense. If she has admitted everything, how is it not cheating. She kept denying everything from the beginning n at last the lady told she was using all dos apps to cheat for money.
    And it means she is being truthful.
    Ok 👋

  • @whitetiger7148
    @whitetiger7148 3 года назад +13

    How is it that no one's talking about the fact that before she met him she was scamming men for money online? Not exactly what I would call a worthy character trait to build a relationship on!

  • @vinhalong
    @vinhalong 5 лет назад +6

    Two issues NOT being "investigated": Her contact with her Ex-husband, and apps to meet 3 men paying her money. This case is a poor one as far as "full investigation"!!!

  • @mauricesutton1906
    @mauricesutton1906 3 года назад +7

    Mr. Cutler knows she’s up to something, that’s why he told her she has to go out of her way to keep her fiancé from being suspicious. I do believe she met up with the ex, that’s the text she says she knows nothing about. Also, they should’ve showed the picture of the nude lady to her fiancé, he would probably known if it was truly her- probably sending it to other guys.

  • @turquoiseheart6320
    @turquoiseheart6320 5 лет назад +10

    Looking at the comments for spoilers, reading about the investigation lady, cutting off the video watching halfway through.

  • @exceltv4765
    @exceltv4765 5 лет назад +8

    👀👀... Where is d lie detector...

  • @twinkletwinkle4944
    @twinkletwinkle4944 5 лет назад +5

    Everyone is truthful for Sisco🤦‍♀️

  • @DshRendar
    @DshRendar 3 года назад +1

    The “ooooohhhh” kills me every time 💀

  • @DouglasShuler
    @DouglasShuler 5 лет назад +4

    Why not the lie detect in concert with that. That type of interrogation is ineffective with a person who is strong willed and at least knows not to open their mouth. And if they do they give you what they want you to have to head in the wrong direction.

  • @tracyeliz2168
    @tracyeliz2168 5 лет назад +3

    Fresh start?! She never cheated 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Worldስፖርት24-7
    @Worldስፖርት24-7 3 года назад +1

    I think she was cheating on this man. She admits to contact her ex. I really don't know why interrogating is used than a lie detector.

  • @geoffn54
    @geoffn54 3 года назад +2

    Just ask the woman if she's been with anyone else; test her... what's with all the interrogation stuff? You can convince some people they're guilty if you're good enough at it.

  • @registeredfullversion8898
    @registeredfullversion8898 5 лет назад +3

    The expert who interrogate is defending her.she cheated even if they just talked because she didn't tell her husband.I consider that's cheating.

  • @andrelamarqjenkins
    @andrelamarqjenkins 2 года назад +1

    I know why he hugged her she is straight up cheating on him, that interrogator sucks

  • @jaxoncrow6918
    @jaxoncrow6918 3 года назад +2

    It's such a slap in the face to the spouse man. When they come with all this tangible evidence, and then it's all dismissed because some woman's opinion says nothing is happening??? It's infuriating I just listened to 20 minutes of legitimate concerns just to hear this lady say what she ALWAYS says

  • @pixelcharm5257
    @pixelcharm5257 4 года назад +1

    im disappointed dude she was too sneaky she was clearly lying

  • @bigred1247
    @bigred1247 3 года назад +1

    She's cheating my gf picked up on some things..namely her excuses

  • @keithoberle6824
    @keithoberle6824 4 года назад +4

    Interrogations only work with extended interviews as they wear down the subject to get to the truth. A one hour interview is not going to reveal the truth as it is much easier to maintain a lie for a short period of time. When it is the interrogator, I skip to the end as i know the result of her assessment "truthful".

  • @wesman9292
    @wesman9292 4 года назад +3

    no one trusts miss sisco!👀

  • @Ahmed-op1pm
    @Ahmed-op1pm 5 лет назад +2

    He's hurt because her hook-ups show addresses he isn't familiar and happy with.

  • @ThisIsAlvo
    @ThisIsAlvo 2 года назад

    This interrogator is extremely incompetent. I doubt that those judges even believe her!

  • @Bmw26-bi2mo
    @Bmw26-bi2mo Год назад +1

    STOP USING SISCO!!!!

  • @future8796
    @future8796 4 года назад +1

    They should of had the lie detector.

  • @robertfishter2862
    @robertfishter2862 4 года назад +2

    He needs to break it off. Even if she never cheated, there are other issues. Didn't she say she contacted her ex when they had a fight? Also, after the court hearing, she said "maybe" about marriage. Even if they got married, the dynamic of the relationship would be one where she felt superior to him.

  • @mr.mayhem5438
    @mr.mayhem5438 3 года назад +1

    Yeah both me and my wife think she was cheating

  • @AndyChilton234
    @AndyChilton234 3 года назад +1

    I wonder had he been chatting to an ex and things like what she has done i bet she would have either cheated or ended the relationship

  • @KennedyA53
    @KennedyA53 4 года назад +1

    “Not talkative and closed, which can mean deception”
    Every introvert: am I a joke to you?

  • @rebeccans7729
    @rebeccans7729 5 лет назад +1

    this woman looked too nervous for someone who 'didnt cheat' he releif after the blonde woman concluded she 'didnt cheat', the way she quickly blamed her kids nah put her on the lie detector and see this man isnt mad !!

  • @RB1US
    @RB1US 5 лет назад

    Wow - if this woman is interrogating enemies we ARE in trouble!

  • @jd-it4on
    @jd-it4on 4 года назад +1

    Interrogations will not work in the setting there are just to many rules these days when it comes to civilians. They need to stop using her and stop using the voice test and only use the lie detector test because the normal person can't beat them.

  • @fredhooshi4294
    @fredhooshi4294 5 лет назад +1

    This is not a life to go on with the seed of deception in back of your mind the rest of your life. The goal in life in to have peace of mind . These lack of trust soils that . The best is seperation

  • @brianflowers586
    @brianflowers586 4 года назад +1

    Why waste the time. If you don’t trust you can’t earn that back. To yelling in the relationship not love. Both move on with your lifes

  • @glenm3712
    @glenm3712 5 лет назад +2

    I thought she looked rather shifty throughout the trial. How did that nude photo wind up on her phone? My gut feel is that she's hiding things.

  • @noelmills4296
    @noelmills4296 4 года назад

    I dont believe the interrogator. This woman is shady.

  • @dominicsciberras8443
    @dominicsciberras8443 4 года назад

    This is not going to work out. Break up is on the horizon.

  • @loriepaix6391
    @loriepaix6391 3 года назад

    Oh, great, the interrogator who never says that a person is lying. Ridiculous.

  • @gopagallashanker9702
    @gopagallashanker9702 4 года назад +1

    Oh god where is lie detector test

  • @Ross2272
    @Ross2272 5 лет назад +7

    It's funny how the interrogator always proves the woman innocent and the man guilty

    • @Limitedonathios
      @Limitedonathios 5 лет назад +1

      ??? This interrogator is known for finding no one guilty. You could've caught your man cheating, banana all up in the lime, and taken videos, but she wont find anyone guilty of cheating. Nice try at inferring an imaginary gender bias tho

  • @firstladypie760
    @firstladypie760 5 лет назад +5

    He is insecure because she is cute, and he is on a more gross side. He is going to be insecure all his life if he marry her.

  • @domjones_who3849
    @domjones_who3849 5 лет назад +2

    We need a lie detector test...not an interrogation...all you've gotta do is say no when someone asks lol lol lol

  • @Princessmom9
    @Princessmom9 5 лет назад +5

    Y'all are so suspicious. If she's home with him on her phone playing games when is she cheating? She can't even go around her family without him being suspicious. And you can see there is an age difference, and he's not the best looking thing around...soooo, he's probably self-conscious and scared she's gonna leave him. And she should.

  • @visitswflorida
    @visitswflorida 5 лет назад +1

    If you have any reason to check up on your spouse it's time to go. Either you're wrong and paranoid or they are messing around. Either way you need to be alone

  • @kwameisfunny
    @kwameisfunny 4 года назад +1

    Time out now cuz we cant forget that she was going to meat up with an ex tho 😂😂

  • @lalrinsangarinsanga3510
    @lalrinsangarinsanga3510 4 года назад +2

    Where is the lie detector
    If they should have done it with the lie detector test for sure she will fail that test she is too lucky for that results it's not accurate

  • @temp7346
    @temp7346 4 года назад +2

    Ok buddy it’s an interrogation, she can lie so easily. She’s just talking to a lady

  • @gayleowens5057
    @gayleowens5057 5 лет назад +4

    This is my ex of 8 yrs , I had 3 jobs (worked with all middle aged women) and did all the inside and outside housework ( because it's womens work) I was constantly accused of cheating and if I went for a coffee at a work friends home after dropping her home after work ,I was a lesbian. Even after I had left him he hired a man to watch the house to I guess to see the parade of men I was hiding from him.

    • @patt2486
      @patt2486 5 лет назад +4

      She should stay gone. Very unhealthy. She looks very fed up. Those tears may affect the Cutlers, but I bet they irritated her. The more abusive/controlling a man is, the more he cries - it's a control tool.

  • @SS-rm9cw
    @SS-rm9cw 4 года назад +1

    Funniest thing is all these people go through all this bs when they know they guilty and expose themselves

  • @lja1159
    @lja1159 4 года назад +1

    Use the lie detector simply asking someone doesn’t work

  • @lotfimouelhi269
    @lotfimouelhi269 4 года назад

    They are in the court room and that is suspicious !!! The phone is telling the truth !

  • @ibrahimrameez8442
    @ibrahimrameez8442 3 года назад

    This interrogator cannot or ever detect any deception...till to-date.

  • @ugochukwuowoh435
    @ugochukwuowoh435 5 лет назад +1

    As far as am concerned that woman right there is cheating. What about the other pictures? Who are they? You can't tell me after revealing to you that she contacted her former boyfriend that you believed she didn't cheat just because she said so? You can't conclude off your assumption

  • @joserodolforamirez8773
    @joserodolforamirez8773 2 года назад

    The stuff on the phone would have been enough for me to just leave her what more do you need if someone's cheating on you you don't have to waste any more time with them

  • @Immssfeb22
    @Immssfeb22 5 лет назад +3

    Hahaha, am certain of exoneration yet I haven't gotten to the end. Just seeing that expert😔

  • @sassafrasstree7449
    @sassafrasstree7449 5 лет назад +1

    Why use the interrogator. Use the lie detector!! Annoying. I think she was lying.

  • @allthingsmelanietj5545
    @allthingsmelanietj5545 4 года назад

    WHY DO YALL KEEP USING THAT LADY AS A CREDIBLE FORM OF DETECTING DECEPTION 🤦🏾‍♀️

  • @kimberlyrobinson1978
    @kimberlyrobinson1978 3 года назад +1

    How was that a “full and complete investigation”?

  • @SR-Bosslady
    @SR-Bosslady 3 года назад

    Couldn't I give them my back up phone to check? If that was clean....Unless they have it verified by my partner....How about, if I was guilty, that I just don't go. Yeah, that's the solution.

  • @luyanda9510
    @luyanda9510 3 года назад +1

    what happened to a lie detector test?

  • @zerenitee
    @zerenitee 5 лет назад +2

    I really don't like the military interrogation. They can keep that

  • @rogerledoux4741
    @rogerledoux4741 5 лет назад

    This is a joke this woman will not ever find a woman guilty. I bet she refused to take the lie detector test.

  • @mattstorey7256
    @mattstorey7256 4 года назад +3

    The lie detector guys, = great, interrogator= not so much. Best? the eye movement, body micro adjustment computer algorithm guy.
    People can, practice breathing and holding pulse down etc. to give, if not false reads, at least inconclusive reads. They got whole training programs with experts, training CIA agents to trick polygraph tests. Most important, people that are pathological, sometimes can be so sick, they can convince themselves the lie they are telling is true. Thus they won't tick for a lie, they KNOW it's true even with evidence to the contrary. The eye tracking and body tick monitor can't be tricked by pathological liars, the eye moves involuntarily.
    His tearful, "I'm relieved" *sniff* and go for a hug. Her body language? Tells it. Blank stare, stiff, "oh this the time I hug him to show I care?" faint hug, head to side to avoid a smooch, break fast and not look his way. Blank stare again, smirk when told to stop making him suspicious, no tears as he sniffles and cries and tells how its going to be great into the future. Post trial, closed off body language, blank pan faced nods, barely look his way as he looks on with adoration.Doomed. He mentioned marriage and she says maybe. Doomed.

  • @christinematthews330
    @christinematthews330 4 года назад

    You can't control people.

  • @BernardBethea6339
    @BernardBethea6339 5 лет назад

    Where are the women saying he is insecure

  • @thomasmargolis3313
    @thomasmargolis3313 5 лет назад

    That pregnant pause before the w/e, dramatic music, are part of the formula for these types of programs.

  • @hujan1744
    @hujan1744 4 года назад

    Her head is vibrating more than Bella Swan's in Twillight saga. And she obviously IS lying. And that interogatoin woman needs to get fired, i can't trust her at all.

  • @reggea83
    @reggea83 5 лет назад +1

    Give her a polygraph text, I believe she's cheating

  • @jdsim9173
    @jdsim9173 2 года назад

    So basically the "interrogator" found nothing, she is useless

  • @trusno7751
    @trusno7751 5 лет назад

    Who wants to live under this type of scrutiny..They need to get a better communication line between them..If you gotta find out and investigate a person, basically thats your answer..Trust your instinct/intuition. ..-Trusno