Thanks for watching! Here is the link for the Lens Sheet: mailchi.mp/kellermanmedia/iphone-15pm-vs-a7siii-signup If you feel like it i wouldnt mind a coffee ☕ Here is the link: geni.us/buymeacoffe 😊
Aperture just like focal length is proportional to sensor size, you have to set 24mm f/6.3 on full frame to get equivalent light capture and depth of field. One thing to mention the Sony is only 12MP while the wide camera on the iPhone is 48MP, I wish you compared resolution.
6:11 i hate nowdays phone camera fake blur (see the upper part of the straps from the backpack),i still prefer the old phone camera with a single sensor,atleast the blur is real,even though not that blur.
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts I really appreciate it. That’s exactly why I included that image because it shows so clearly how poorly smart phones does this if it’s not in a situation that it’s tailored to handle.
The ultra wide camera is f/10 equivalent and the tele is f/21 - if you want more far background in your macro you can use an extension tube on your 24mm :) - but usually you don’t, having more working distance and background compression is an advantage
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. However I don’t really know what your reference is for those numbers? I haven’t found any exact data about the image sensors. So for those reading that are surprised by what you are saying because the meta data of the ultra wide camera gives a f/2.2. The 2.2 is referring to the light that is let in through the lens, but not the depth of field. DigiDriftZone is referring totally to the depth of field equivalent fstop. To get the equivalent depth of field f-stop to a full frame camera like the Sony A7SIII (diagonal 35 mm) you need to do some calculation. The aperture f/10 comes from multiplying the 2.2 by the image sensor size (crop factor), that in your statement would be equivalent to 4.55 (10/2.2). Which would mean that the sensor is of the ultra wide lens in the iPhone is 9.51 mm (43.3/4.55)… Thanks again.
@@MK-Creator Tony calculated it :) < ruclips.net/video/gzf2B72juCE/видео.html So what you're getting is 13mm f/10, 24mm f/6.3 and 77mm f/24 (120mm f/21 on the Max) fixed aperture equivalents to full frame. You can try this experimentally too. What's interesting is the 15 Pro has 14 stops of dynamic range, which is insane! - but that's only at ISO1200 - applying the crop factor (you have to apply crop factor to focal length, aperture and ISO, many people forget to apply it to ISO), that's around ISO10,000 on full frame equivalent, there's no dual native ISO though. If you want maximum dynamic range you need to add an ND filter to the iPhone and shoot at ISO1200, any lower and you start to lose dynamic range. That was tested by Gerald Undone.
I dont doubt anything you say. I have a samsung s23 ultra, and sure its great for landscape shots. But I take wildlife photos with Nikon dslr's and possibly a fully digital camera in the future. If cameras on phones can have 600mm lenses, it would be great, but I prefer my Nikon d500 and 600mm lens for shots with wildlife and birds, they dont pose for pictures. I think phones are great for macro photography though. Keep making your videos, they are a joy to watch, lots of info...
Thank you so much for taking your time to share your thoughts. It’s highly appreciated. I completely agree with you smart phones are great for those everyday shots that they are tailored to do but when it comes to more specific use cases where you have higher requirements, they are pretty far from what we can get from professional camera setups. Thank you so much again for spending some time here and I hope to see you again .
Great comparison. Thank you for making this. One commenter, the one that pointed out about printing onto A3 paper - has a valid point. I started with film cameras without an exposure meter, went to rangefinders, next to Nikon and Canon film SLRs and then eventually to DSLRs. I recently started shooting with the M43 systems and I am shocked how well they print. Extremely handy to have and to use. But not as good as my DSLR cameras. However, I don’t really care. I had the opportunity to work with an iPhone 15 Pro this past week and they take great photos. I don’t care how well they look, printed at the A3 size, but I still want one. I’ll probably wait for the iPhone 16, but I just might break down and buy the 15. It won’t replace anything I own, but I bet I’ll get some great photos and more of them too. Thanks again for your video.
Mobile phone's tiny sensor can't beat the wide Dynamic range of 35mm or cropped sensor at any cost... Although the portability of mobile phone wins over Digital camera.
Thanks for watching!
Here is the link for the Lens Sheet: mailchi.mp/kellermanmedia/iphone-15pm-vs-a7siii-signup
If you feel like it i wouldnt mind a coffee ☕ Here is the link:
geni.us/buymeacoffe
😊
Aperture just like focal length is proportional to sensor size, you have to set 24mm f/6.3 on full frame to get equivalent light capture and depth of field.
One thing to mention the Sony is only 12MP while the wide camera on the iPhone is 48MP, I wish you compared resolution.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
6:11 i hate nowdays phone camera fake blur (see the upper part of the straps from the backpack),i still prefer the old phone camera with a single sensor,atleast the blur is real,even though not that blur.
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts I really appreciate it. That’s exactly why I included that image because it shows so clearly how poorly smart phones does this if it’s not in a situation that it’s tailored to handle.
The ultra wide camera is f/10 equivalent and the tele is f/21 - if you want more far background in your macro you can use an extension tube on your 24mm :) - but usually you don’t, having more working distance and background compression is an advantage
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. However I don’t really know what your reference is for those numbers? I haven’t found any exact data about the image sensors.
So for those reading that are surprised by what you are saying because the meta data of the ultra wide camera gives a f/2.2.
The 2.2 is referring to the light that is let in through the lens, but not the depth of field. DigiDriftZone is referring totally to the depth of field equivalent fstop.
To get the equivalent depth of field f-stop to a full frame camera like the Sony A7SIII (diagonal 35 mm) you need to do some calculation.
The aperture f/10 comes from multiplying the 2.2 by the image sensor size (crop factor), that in your statement would be equivalent to 4.55 (10/2.2). Which would mean that the sensor is of the ultra wide lens in the iPhone is 9.51 mm (43.3/4.55)…
Thanks again.
@@MK-Creator Tony calculated it :) < ruclips.net/video/gzf2B72juCE/видео.html
So what you're getting is 13mm f/10, 24mm f/6.3 and 77mm f/24 (120mm f/21 on the Max) fixed aperture equivalents to full frame. You can try this experimentally too.
What's interesting is the 15 Pro has 14 stops of dynamic range, which is insane! - but that's only at ISO1200 - applying the crop factor (you have to apply crop factor to focal length, aperture and ISO, many people forget to apply it to ISO), that's around ISO10,000 on full frame equivalent, there's no dual native ISO though. If you want maximum dynamic range you need to add an ND filter to the iPhone and shoot at ISO1200, any lower and you start to lose dynamic range. That was tested by Gerald Undone.
what microphone were you using in this video?
Thanks in advance!
That was the rode wireless pro. :)
@@MK-Creator appreciated!!
Thank you 🙏🏼
I dont doubt anything you say. I have a samsung s23 ultra, and sure its great for landscape shots. But I take wildlife photos with Nikon dslr's and possibly a fully digital camera in the future. If cameras on phones can have 600mm lenses, it would be great, but I prefer my Nikon d500 and 600mm lens for shots with wildlife and birds, they dont pose for pictures. I think phones are great for macro photography though. Keep making your videos, they are a joy to watch, lots of info...
Thank you so much for taking your time to share your thoughts. It’s highly appreciated.
I completely agree with you smart phones are great for those everyday shots that they are tailored to do but when it comes to more specific use cases where you have higher requirements, they are pretty far from what we can get from professional camera setups.
Thank you so much again for spending some time here and I hope to see you again .
Great comparison. Thank you for making this. One commenter, the one that pointed out about printing onto A3 paper - has a valid point. I started with film cameras without an exposure meter, went to rangefinders, next to Nikon and Canon film SLRs and then eventually to DSLRs. I recently started shooting with the M43 systems and I am shocked how well they print. Extremely handy to have and to use. But not as good as my DSLR cameras. However, I don’t really care. I had the opportunity to work with an iPhone 15 Pro this past week and they take great photos. I don’t care how well they look, printed at the A3 size, but I still want one. I’ll probably wait for the iPhone 16, but I just might break down and buy the 15. It won’t replace anything I own, but I bet I’ll get some great photos and more of them too. Thanks again for your video.
Thank you so much for all your thoughts that you took your time to share 😊👍
The portability of the iPhone wins. Use the big camera and lenses for specialist pictures such as wildlife.
Very well said. I would even add that I would still use the pro camera for all planed shots.
Thanks for watching and for sharing your thoughts.
Mobile phone's tiny sensor can't beat the wide Dynamic range of 35mm or cropped sensor at any cost... Although the portability of mobile phone wins over Digital camera.
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts.
😃👍
For sure I will go for phone, simplicity, better picture. You may want to do one with Huawei Mate 40 or 60.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Unfortunately I dont have access to any huawei phones at the moment.
Excellent video I can’t believe the quality of the iPhone 15. I’m very impressed.
The power of the smartphones ❤️😃
Pointless exercise, especially if the output is to a digital device. Print on A3 paper, and see the difference.
That’s what I want to highlight. You need to know the limitations to be able to use it 😊
Thank you for sharing your thoughts .
Didn't watch the video but the answer is no
😂
Definitely, Sony Pro Camrea is much better. I feel solid in my hand and smart to hold a Pro canera 📷
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!!!💭
Totally agree! I’ll continue to use my Sony for all planed shots 😃👍
А варианты Айфон болуы фантастика! Өтірік айтып жібермедіңізбе?😀