Hey doctor! I recentlty came accross your channel as a clinical psychologist. I am currently writing my thesis and I found your videos helpful. Thanks :)
Love the detailed comparison. You will be impressed with JASP 0.19 I think. It will hit us in 1 or 2 months with massive improvements to recoding etc. I agree with your stance of a tie currently. Both programs have the same number of strong points and weaknesses. The biggest weakness with jamovi I see is, that it does not allow to resort or duplicate analyses and the lack of integrated help files. So I am curious: How do you manage these points?
Very much looking forward to that! For my purposes, resorting analyses isn’t a game changer or breaker. I’ll have to remind myself about the duplication of analyses, because I’m remembering something but my memory might be conflating functionality. If I’m misremembering, I’m not entirely sure it would be a big deal to me either, again a minor point. The help files are huge and some do need to be added. Jamovi does rely on external help from useful others (such as myself), which can be a problem if a user doesn’t know where to look, like Learning Stats with Jamovi. I still give Jamovi the edge in the tie, as I say in the video, because my course are built on its functionality. I also think Jamovi is slightly more intuitive in its GUI and its expansion with modules and R packages.
@@AlexanderSwan yeah, the gui is a bit more explicit. With "learning statistics with jamovi" you mean the book by navarro? Thats a good one, yes, I also use the jasp version of that sometimes (but that one is now a bit outdated, 2019).
Thank you for your great videos. One of my friend is a professor and uses JASP to teach. I prefer Jamovi and one of the main points is that Jamovi works much better with R to get a more full experience with the software. Thanks, Fraser Schwalley
Hey doctor! I recentlty came accross your channel as a clinical psychologist. I am currently writing my thesis and I found your videos helpful. Thanks :)
Nice comparison! What do you think about the machine learning module in JASP? And, is there anything similar in Jamovi?
I don’t do machine learning so I have not looked at either app’s module on that, sorry! Thanks for taking a look :)
Love the detailed comparison. You will be impressed with JASP 0.19 I think. It will hit us in 1 or 2 months with massive improvements to recoding etc. I agree with your stance of a tie currently. Both programs have the same number of strong points and weaknesses. The biggest weakness with jamovi I see is, that it does not allow to resort or duplicate analyses and the lack of integrated help files. So I am curious: How do you manage these points?
Very much looking forward to that! For my purposes, resorting analyses isn’t a game changer or breaker. I’ll have to remind myself about the duplication of analyses, because I’m remembering something but my memory might be conflating functionality. If I’m misremembering, I’m not entirely sure it would be a big deal to me either, again a minor point.
The help files are huge and some do need to be added. Jamovi does rely on external help from useful others (such as myself), which can be a problem if a user doesn’t know where to look, like Learning Stats with Jamovi.
I still give Jamovi the edge in the tie, as I say in the video, because my course are built on its functionality. I also think Jamovi is slightly more intuitive in its GUI and its expansion with modules and R packages.
@@AlexanderSwan yeah, the gui is a bit more explicit. With "learning statistics with jamovi" you mean the book by navarro? Thats a good one, yes, I also use the jasp version of that sometimes (but that one is now a bit outdated, 2019).
Thank you for your great videos. One of my friend is a professor and uses JASP to teach. I prefer Jamovi and one of the main points is that Jamovi works much better with R to get a more full experience with the software.
Thanks,
Fraser Schwalley