We can not see what filters are turned On or what settings are set where? I also don’t speak or read Japanese so most of the posting is unreadable to me.
9700 sounds fuller and a bit more intelligible. i did not expect this, because the dynamic range of the 9700 is only 74dB, a good receicer has at least 80dB dynamic range. how does the receiver of the 9700 compare to the icom ic970h ?
We can not see what filters are turned On or what settings are set where? I also don’t speak or read Japanese so most of the posting is unreadable to me.
9700 sounds fuller and a bit more intelligible. i did not expect this, because the dynamic range of the 9700 is only 74dB, a good receicer has at least 80dB dynamic range. how does the receiver of the 9700 compare to the icom ic970h ?
参考になりました。両者、感度的にはあまり差はありませんが、IC-9700の方がSN比が良いです。ノイズが少なく受信局が浮かび上がってきます。
視聴有難うございます。実験ではNRは入れておりませんでしたが、NRでどれ位信号が浮かび上がるかまた実験してみたいと思います。
私もIC-9700の購入を考えています。今後も動画アップお願いします。
@@kitayoshi56
9700、FIL2ってなってましたけど、帯域を狭めてたのでしょうか?
On 9700 you have:
PRE On
Filter 2
PBT On
Factious and liar test