The second movement is absolutely sublime... a real treat - and even when I'm listening in the background, I have to stop and watch him play it. I just can't have other windows on top.
F.Say is so remarkable.Og O wish he would play in Miami. his color and atmospheremake this themost enigmatic , bewitchigand yet clear ad communicative Sonatine .Woderful!
I saw him at Symphony Center in Chicago. His playing was genuine for the main program where he played all Schumann. His first encore was the final variation of Mozart's "Ah vous dirai-je, Maman". The second encore was Mozart's Alla Turca: Allegretto from Piano Sonata in A K.331. I've not seen improvising like this since Glenn Gould who routinely improvised works, especially those by Bach. If that was not enough, he came out to play the final movement of this work by Ravel. Flawless and colorful.
@@berkeumutsahinturk921 Tempest genel olarak yorumlaması çok zor bir eser değil. Temaları boğacak materyaller yoğun olmadığı için çok üstün bir çaba sarf etmeden dinleyiciye ana fikri vermek mümkün. Ki Ravel'in sonatini öyle değil, bir sürü motif iç içe giriyor ve temaları öne çıkarması zorlaşıyor.
To begin with I am just a beginner at music theory/history. But, I think after this piece we should ask Say "Do you think what you just played was classical music?". I do not think he would answer "yes". But in his regular concerts he already sticks to original sheet -in a concerto it would already make no sense ignoring the original tempo. I think he understands the pieces very clearly, so he can interpret them in their original form. And, he can add his expressions influenced by modern styles.
I disagree, old boys don't play unmemorable and uncreative. Not with a single boring line without anything extraordinary but with rational ups and downs.
Makes me laugh how people pretends that he doesn't play it right and call it arrogance. Yes ravel wouldn't play it this way. But the music belongs to the one that plays it on the piano, this is his vision of the sonatine, it's called bzing free
I have the sheet music, from the library, to this piece before me. It's the 1913 Editions Durand printing. Would you kindly point out to me where Fazil Say deviates from the score?
Sure, the strange expressions and gestures are not the best for the sake of the performance, but he sure seems to be enjoying it. Plus it's quite amusing to watch.
I have, from the library, a copy of the sheet music before me. Would you kindly point out where, exactly, Fazil Say deviates from the score? I have the 1913 Editions Durand version.
18 cene katiliyorum...laflar hemen arkadan anlasiliyor.. bu adam zaten her zaman bizim ülkeyi disarida destekledi ve temsil etti.Kendisi her zaman icin türk virtuozu olarak tanildi.hakli tabi ya..müzik dersi yerine din dersiymis..böyle bir sey olamaz..dindar olan zaten dindardir..olmayani da zaten yapamassin..dini siyasete sokupta mecbur etmek en sacma olay...fazil hoca helal sana
Humm, another poseur, probably Mammoth's boyfriend. Starting at 2:25 the chords are ambiguous, as one might expect, and the progression is as follows: Bdim7, Edim7, Bdim7, Edim7, leading to the climax of C-F-C. Nowhere are there straight major or minor chords. Of course, Mammoth10 originally claimed not that there were merely two or three wrong notes (which there aren't), but that Say was playing something not in the score, and was "making his own transcription of the piece."
Dear Mammoth 10, I have, from the library, a copy of the sheet music before me. Would you kindly point out where, exactly, Fazil Say deviates from the score? I have the 1913 Editions Durand version.
O.k., fair enough. Unlike Mammoth 10, you know the piece. At the risk of inviting M.10 to suggest all sorts of imaginary wrong notes, I'll be honest and admit that in 5 simultaneous tones played rapidly, my ear is too poor to tell if that is an F# or not, or a B-nat. in the next measure. But I'll still give the benefit of the doubt to Say. From what I can hear, as compared to the score, he plays no wrong notes. I am able, however, discern all the rhythms and those Fazil Say nails perfectly.
The trouble with classical music at RUclips is that there is always some guy (it's always a guy) who has been appointed by God to point out the flaws (as imagined by him) in a performance by a celebrated artist. Of course, when you click on the critic's channel, he invariably has nothing to show for his soi-disant genius. I own a copy of the score for Ravel's *Sonatine,* and I can attest to the fact that Say plays the piece precisely as Ravel wrote it. Each variation in tempo is as indicated by Ravel. I challenge all the puerile critics below to specify exactly where they imagine this performance varies from what Ravel wrote.
yeah, always hate it when this random guy out of nowhere goes: "an error at 3:whatever time".. Irritates me so much, like they can play it as good as the performer
Firelord0EX It might be OK if the critic has his own performance video of the piece that he wants to show off. That I could tolerate. But you click on the critic's channel and, without exception, no videos; maybe something about how he liked a Lorde video. That's true not just here but with all critical comments under classical videos. It's typical for some poor apple, with no talent or skill, to gain self-esteem on the cheap by deprecating the accomplishments of gifted people.
Keith Otis Edwards Okay, I also have the score. A few things I noticed in the first movement. Perhaps you can cross-check them. Bar 5 - does not observe mf at end of bar Bars 24 - 25 - does not synchronize chords but instead breaks left and right hands In the middle of the development where it is written a tempo does not observe pp marking and instead crescendos to forte Does not observe anime tempo marking in the development Does not observe only ff marking and instead plays considerably quieter then the music that goes before.
After examining the score to Ravel's "Sonatine," and after following the score as the video plays, and after repeated requests to Mammoth10 to reveal just where he thinks Say deviates from the score, I can report that Fazil Say plays each note perfectly just as Ravel wrote it, and that Mammoth 10 is just another poseur and troller looking to get some attention.
@bs2k6 je sais que je me ferais cracher avec mon français que j'apprends depuis 2 mois. ça changera bientot. mais toi tu vas continuer melanger le nationalism et la musique avec cette point de vue. je pense pas que ça va changer.
Nice technique, and he plays the rhythms well! I have some minor, debatable issues...I think he's a bit too showy - instead of all the movement he could be concentrating on bringing the melody out more. Also, he ignores some important articulations. In the second movement, the end of the first theme has the two bass notes marked staccato which he plays legato AND pedals! There's a difference between interpretation and playing something incorrectly. It was written that way for a reason!
i don't agree. there is a difference between recreating and improvising. Because those notes were marked staccato they weren't set in stone to be played that way. Here's the thing, a lot of people play from notes but add nothing of their own making music dull and boring over time because nothing changes. Maybe he didn't change much in this piece, but his version of the Turkish March is off the scale of awesomeness.
What is amazing is that you are still talking/replying back to me! I hope, at least, all that name-calling and insults were making you feel better about yourself! Anyhow, if you decide to continue this moronic chat, by all means but I will not indulge myself any further...
(for Keith Otis Edwards and all those who have the score) Okay, I also have the score. A few things I noticed in the first movement. Perhaps you can cross-check them. Bar 5 - does not observe mf at end of bar Bars 24 - 25 - does not synchronize chords but instead breaks left and right hands In the middle of the development where it is written a tempo does not observe pp marking and instead crescendos to forte Does not observe anime tempo marking in the development Does not observe only ff marking and instead plays considerably quieter then the music that goes before.
Ethan Those who are interested in the accuracy of the great musician "Ethan" and his nitpicking of this performance but who do not have access to the score can check maestro Ethan's accusations against the timings shown in the video. Judge for yourself how accurate and significant his complaints are: The score indicates that between 0:18 and 0:20 the music should become louder. Dr. Ethan maintains that Fazil Say fails to play louder. ("does not observe mf at end of bar") At 2:16 the score calls for the music to become quiet. The renowned virtuoso Ethan says that it is instead played louder. ("does not observe pp marking and instead crescendos to forte") (At 2:18 it is supposed to become louder.) At 2:27 the score is marked *Animé* ("animated"). Professor Ethan complains that this marking is not observed and that the playing is not "animated." The first movement is supposed to reach its dynamic peak at 2:31. Ethan (the great composer) accuses that it "instead plays considerably quieter then [sic] the music that goes before." (At 2:32 it is then supposed to become softer and slower, so maybe Ethan is just slow.) Such young geniuses (or just "Ethan" under different names) have for years been disparaging this performance as "a mess," but that's all they can come up with. I think it's a fine performance, and that Ethan should instead shut up and practice his scales.
Keith Otis Edwards I appreciate your willingness to defend individuality. But I'm not happy with your hypocrisy. You obviously no little to nothing of this music (or have no hearing) so how can you judge others on their criticism? 'I own a copy of the score for Ravel's Sonatine, and I can attest to the fact that Say plays the piece precisely as Ravel wrote it' is simply wrong. Can you please not post uninformed imperatives in the future as it misinforms all the young people on the site. Thank you
Ethan Now that I've posted the timings in the video as they relate to your criticism, the whole world can decide for themselves how valid your nitpicking is. It is unnecessary for me to comment further, as people can now make up their own minds as to what your criticism is worth.
At 8:23 he plays a G instead of a G sharp.. And he does arpeggioes all over the peace. I like somewhat like his interpretation, but sometimes it's just out of proportions..
Usually i like Fazil Say a lot .. here i find him tottaly having "passed by" .. Of course it is certain that he really lives what he plays .. adn that he has a vision of this master piece ... So, to me, there stay an interesting curiosity: The probably most "anti-Ravelien" great performance i have ever heard ... LOL ...
then close your eyes and just listen. If you still don't like it, that's fine. But I really don't think what he looks like should have any bearing on what you think of his playing. Since I've scrolled all the way down to your comment, I can't see his face in the video window. And he sounds okay. Maybe not the best... but his gyrations on the bench really aren't the point.
@Piano194 The trouble with classical music at RUclips is that there's always some guy (it's always a guy) who has been appointed by God to point out the flaws (as imagined by him) in a performance by a celebrated artist. Of course, when you click on the critic's channel, he invariably has nothing to show for his soi-disant genius. It seems typical for some poor apple with no talent or ability to gain self-esteem on the cheap by deprecating the accomplishments of gifted people.
what about following what the composer wrote in the score? a fortissimo when Ravel says pianissimo? - that's called arrogance. Otherwise, very impressive pianism....
I love Fazil Say's interpretation of the Ravel "Sonatine." He not only plays the music; he feels it, What wonderful pianism!
really nice and singing
lots of atmosphare
imaginative
Fazıl Say senin sayende klasik müzik dinler oldum usta. hayata bakışımı değiştirdin
Genuine pianist and artist, he takes liberties while scrupulously respecting the score. He has his own style and I love it
The second movement is absolutely sublime... a real treat - and even when I'm listening in the background, I have to stop and watch him play it. I just can't have other windows on top.
Extraordinary, possibly a genius..
So very nice Mr Say. You admirably seek to bring out the various important musical threads
Professor Snape!!!!
@MusikalischesHaus He LIVES the music, that's what his moving around is all about. He is not posing or anything. I can only applaud such dedication.
F.Say is so remarkable.Og O wish he would play in Miami. his color and atmospheremake this themost enigmatic , bewitchigand yet clear ad communicative Sonatine .Woderful!
I saw him at Symphony Center in Chicago. His playing was genuine for the main program where he played all Schumann. His first encore was the final variation of Mozart's "Ah vous dirai-je, Maman". The second encore was Mozart's Alla Turca: Allegretto from Piano Sonata in A K.331. I've not seen improvising like this since Glenn Gould who routinely improvised works, especially those by Bach. If that was not enough, he came out to play the final movement of this work by Ravel. Flawless and colorful.
Stunning interpretation of Ravel. One of the best I've heard. The physical interpretation can be distracting but I really don't mind.
Superlative playing and wonderful music!
just wonderful !
Virtuosity ! Ravel and Say. Turkish and high quality music lovers all around the Worls should be proud of them.
So beautiful, wow.
LOL! Funny man! He seems to really have enjoyed playing to that audience.
Fazil Say est un cadeau du ciel.
Them faces, expressions, and singing: Lang Lang meets Richard Goode.
Face expressions means nothing. A performer has to play with his hands and heart not with his face.
@@yagiz885 That wasn't especially profound
Inspired, sincere playing
DÜNYADAN TANINAN 10 TÜRK den BIRIDIR !!!!! SENINLE GURUR DUYUYORUZ!
love him
I myself consider music great art where style deals a great matter. You implement your style so the piece is to your own liking, not someone else's.
He really makes the music come alive. This is what Ravel must have intended.
Looking each movement?
00:11 First Movement
03:37 Second Movement
06:12 Third Movement
Now, enjoy this extraordinary interpretation.
fantastic
❤️Ravel
awesome
He reminds me of the Hunchback of Notre Dame.
he knows how to touch piano
Evet bütün eseri ppp çalarak inanılmaz iyi dokunuyor piyanoya ya :D :D :D
@@berkeumutsahinturk921 Tempest genel olarak yorumlaması çok zor bir eser değil. Temaları boğacak materyaller yoğun olmadığı için çok üstün bir çaba sarf etmeden dinleyiciye ana fikri vermek mümkün. Ki Ravel'in sonatini öyle değil, bir sürü motif iç içe giriyor ve temaları öne çıkarması zorlaşıyor.
Sürekli aynı tonlarda çalmak bu yüzden büyük bir problem, çok renkli ve spontane bir teknik lazım bu eserin ana mesajını dinleyiciye ulaştırmak için.
Su gibi, toprak hava gibi nereye giderse gitsin yaratıcı bir olağanüstü müzik insanı ne kadar övünsek azdır. .... söylenebilecek son söz budur .....
To begin with I am just a beginner at music theory/history. But, I think after this piece we should ask Say "Do you think what you just played was classical music?". I do not think he would answer "yes". But in his regular concerts he already sticks to original sheet -in a concerto it would already make no sense ignoring the original tempo. I think he understands the pieces very clearly, so he can interpret them in their original form. And, he can add his expressions influenced by modern styles.
Thats the point.
wow!
Ein Genie.Harika.
just cool...
Beautiful phrasing. He plays Ravel like the old boys!
I disagree, old boys don't play unmemorable and uncreative. Not with a single boring line without anything extraordinary but with rational ups and downs.
very good performance
bravo fazil....
Tek kelimeyle muhtesem.Sanattan anlamayanlarin cahilce elestirilerini onemsemiyorum. O bir deha.
@Piano194 Just like singers take music already written and make it their own, so can pianists, like Fazil Say
空中に手やる動きウケる
Vaya pose del pianista.
I agree.
Yea, he plays the right hand notes slightly later in some places...
Makes me laugh how people pretends that he doesn't play it right and call it arrogance. Yes ravel wouldn't play it this way. But the music belongs to the one that plays it on the piano, this is his vision of the sonatine, it's called bzing free
Suspended sentence... he will not be in prison.
I have the sheet music, from the library, to this piece before me. It's the 1913 Editions Durand printing. Would you kindly point out to me where Fazil Say deviates from the score?
Wow, amazing. Very nice phrasing, but I kind of thought in the 1st movement he could have brought out the melody a little bit more though.
너무잘친다..
actually thats usually what he intends to do.
People don't be so freakin' nit-picky! It's annoying! JEEZ!! Just appreciate it for what it is... a very beautiful piece played by an amazing pianist!
Sure, the strange expressions and gestures are not the best for the sake of the performance, but he sure seems to be enjoying it. Plus it's quite amusing to watch.
süper
he always looks like he's drunk. genious skills though.
Yeah what a genius. he can't show up the themes well, his playing is not memorizable at all.
He is amazing
I have, from the library, a copy of the sheet music before me. Would you kindly point out where, exactly, Fazil Say deviates from the score? I have the 1913 Editions Durand version.
Fazıl say canlı performansdan gelenleri göreyim
se llama sonatine 1
Does any one else think Terry Jones from Monty Python when they look at this guy? Great rendition BTW.
3:38 s~ second movement
woow the best ravels sonatine interpretation ive heard
Have you listened Perlemuter's interpretation? It's way better than his.
18 cene katiliyorum...laflar hemen arkadan anlasiliyor.. bu adam zaten her zaman bizim ülkeyi disarida destekledi ve temsil etti.Kendisi her zaman icin türk virtuozu olarak tanildi.hakli tabi ya..müzik dersi yerine din dersiymis..böyle bir sey olamaz..dindar olan zaten dindardir..olmayani da zaten yapamassin..dini siyasete sokupta mecbur etmek en sacma olay...fazil hoca helal sana
Humm, another poseur, probably Mammoth's boyfriend. Starting at 2:25 the chords are ambiguous, as one might expect, and the progression is as follows: Bdim7, Edim7, Bdim7, Edim7, leading to the climax of C-F-C. Nowhere are there straight major or minor chords.
Of course, Mammoth10 originally claimed not that there were merely two or three wrong notes (which there aren't), but that Say was playing something not in the score, and was "making his own transcription of the piece."
Dear Mammoth 10,
I have, from the library, a copy of the sheet music before me. Would you kindly point out where, exactly, Fazil Say deviates from the score? I have the 1913 Editions Durand version.
Hahaha you guys funny. He is Fazil Say. He is pro. Cheapest ticket goes not less 1000$ if you can find seat. He is very famous. I guess he is turkish.
como se llama esta obra??
alguien sabe??
Music
il est fouuuuuu
haha it was a beautiful performance but the hand movements crack me up lol
@fikradas I agree, he ruins my favourite section at 4:50 by just shotgunning right through it... love his enthusiasm, but it's definitely at a cost.
more of a fan of David Fung's interpretation of this.
@10Aytek10 öbürleri kim...?
I never heard that before maybe he is a savant some sort.:D
he looks like oscar wilde on a diet. but excellent performance.
O.k., fair enough. Unlike Mammoth 10, you know the piece. At the risk of inviting M.10 to suggest all sorts of imaginary wrong notes, I'll be honest and admit that in 5 simultaneous tones played rapidly, my ear is too poor to tell if that is an F# or not, or a B-nat. in the next measure. But I'll still give the benefit of the doubt to Say. From what I can hear, as compared to the score, he plays no wrong notes.
I am able, however, discern all the rhythms and those Fazil Say nails perfectly.
The trouble with classical music at RUclips is that there is always some guy (it's always a guy) who has been appointed by God to point out the flaws (as imagined by him) in a performance by a celebrated artist. Of course, when you click on the critic's channel, he invariably has nothing to show for his soi-disant genius.
I own a copy of the score for Ravel's *Sonatine,* and I can attest to the fact that Say plays the piece precisely as Ravel wrote it. Each variation in tempo is as indicated by Ravel. I challenge all the puerile critics below to specify exactly where they imagine this performance varies from what Ravel wrote.
yeah, always hate it when this random guy out of nowhere goes: "an error at 3:whatever time".. Irritates me so much, like they can play it as good as the performer
Firelord0EX It might be OK if the critic has his own performance video of the piece that he wants to show off. That I could tolerate. But you click on the critic's channel and, without exception, no videos; maybe something about how he liked a Lorde video. That's true not just here but with all critical comments under classical videos.
It's typical for some poor apple, with no talent or skill, to gain self-esteem on the cheap by deprecating the accomplishments of gifted people.
It's called a troll.
"Troll" is too kind. When I read such comments, I think, "Loser" -- or more accurately, "rectum."
Keith Otis Edwards
Okay, I also have the score. A few things I noticed in the first movement. Perhaps you can cross-check them.
Bar 5 - does not observe mf at end of bar
Bars 24 - 25 - does not synchronize chords but instead breaks left and right hands
In the middle of the development where it is written a tempo does not observe pp marking and instead crescendos to forte
Does not observe anime tempo marking in the development
Does not observe only ff marking and instead plays considerably quieter then the music that goes before.
wtf does jajaja mean...
After examining the score to Ravel's "Sonatine," and after following the score as the video plays, and after repeated requests to Mammoth10 to reveal just where he thinks Say deviates from the score, I can report that Fazil Say plays each note perfectly just as Ravel wrote it, and that Mammoth 10 is just another poseur and troller looking to get some attention.
he has super bad posture, but it doesn't matter because he is an amazingly talented pianist.
@RidinOn20s
kimse kim ... arastir bul.
@Piano194 u know what interpretation means m8..if u dont ,look at the dictionary
quelle interprétation sensuelle, intimiste et vraiment inspirée !! une des meilleures versions de cette pièce
@bs2k6 je sais que je me ferais cracher avec mon français que j'apprends depuis 2 mois. ça changera bientot.
mais toi tu vas continuer melanger le nationalism et la musique avec cette point de vue. je pense pas que ça va changer.
Nice technique, and he plays the rhythms well! I have some minor, debatable issues...I think he's a bit too showy - instead of all the movement he could be concentrating on bringing the melody out more. Also, he ignores some important articulations. In the second movement, the end of the first theme has the two bass notes marked staccato which he plays legato AND pedals! There's a difference between interpretation and playing something incorrectly. It was written that way for a reason!
Yeah minor debatable.
Hey! He looks like Nicholas Cage!
He looks like Snape. Haha lols
Ehh, because i've played it. If you had, you would have noticed it too.
It is you who should be ashamed of having written that derogatory message.
He doesn't have to hide behind a folding panel.
i don't agree.
there is a difference between recreating and improvising. Because those notes were marked staccato they weren't set in stone to be played that way. Here's the thing, a lot of people play from notes but add nothing of their own making music dull and boring over time because nothing changes. Maybe he didn't change much in this piece, but his version of the Turkish March is off the scale of awesomeness.
Maybe he is xD
just maybe =] hehe
What is amazing is that you are still talking/replying back to me!
I hope, at least, all that name-calling and insults were making you feel better about yourself! Anyhow, if you decide to continue this moronic chat, by all means but I will not indulge myself any further...
(for Keith Otis Edwards and all those who have the score) Okay, I also have the score. A few things I noticed in the first movement. Perhaps you can cross-check them.
Bar 5 - does not observe mf at end of bar
Bars 24 - 25 - does not synchronize chords but instead breaks left and right hands
In the middle of the development where it is written a tempo does not observe pp marking and instead crescendos to forte
Does not observe anime tempo marking in the development
Does not observe only ff marking and instead plays considerably quieter then the music that goes before.
Ethan Those who are interested in the accuracy of the great musician "Ethan" and his nitpicking of this performance but who do not have access to the score can check maestro Ethan's accusations against the timings shown in the video. Judge for yourself how accurate and significant his complaints are:
The score indicates that between 0:18 and 0:20 the music should become louder. Dr. Ethan maintains that Fazil Say fails to play louder. ("does not observe mf at end of bar")
At 2:16 the score calls for the music to become quiet. The renowned virtuoso Ethan says that it is instead played louder. ("does not observe pp marking and instead crescendos to forte") (At 2:18 it is supposed to become louder.)
At 2:27 the score is marked *Animé* ("animated"). Professor Ethan complains that this marking is not observed and that the playing is not "animated."
The first movement is supposed to reach its dynamic peak at 2:31. Ethan (the great composer) accuses that it "instead plays considerably quieter then [sic] the music that goes before." (At 2:32 it is then supposed to become softer and slower, so maybe Ethan is just slow.)
Such young geniuses (or just "Ethan" under different names) have for years been disparaging this performance as "a mess," but that's all they can come up with.
I think it's a fine performance, and that Ethan should instead shut up and practice his scales.
Keith Otis Edwards I appreciate your willingness to defend individuality. But I'm not happy with your hypocrisy. You obviously no little to nothing of this music (or have no hearing) so how can you judge others on their criticism? 'I own a copy of the score for Ravel's Sonatine, and I can attest to the fact that Say plays the piece precisely as Ravel wrote it' is simply wrong. Can you please not post uninformed imperatives in the future as it misinforms all the young people on the site. Thank you
Ethan Now that I've posted the timings in the video as they relate to your criticism, the whole world can decide for themselves how valid your nitpicking is. It is unnecessary for me to comment further, as people can now make up their own minds as to what your criticism is worth.
Once you mature, trolling won't seem so cool anymore.
+Keith Otis Edwards TROLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOL I'M 65 YEARS OLD XDXDXD PTDR.
peasant.
At 8:23 he plays a G instead of a G sharp.. And he does arpeggioes all over the peace. I like somewhat like his interpretation, but sometimes it's just out of proportions..
To respect the composer.
@bs2k6 cest toi qui a utilise ce phrase "honteux d'etre francais"
cest ironique que tu ne comprends pas ton stereotype.
Usually i like Fazil Say a lot ..
here i find him tottaly having "passed by" ..
Of course it is certain that he really lives what he plays .. adn that he has a vision of this master piece ...
So, to me, there stay an interesting curiosity: The probably most "anti-Ravelien" great performance i have ever heard ... LOL ...
then close your eyes and just listen. If you still don't like it, that's fine. But I really don't think what he looks like should have any bearing on what you think of his playing. Since I've scrolled all the way down to your comment, I can't see his face in the video window. And he sounds okay. Maybe not the best... but his gyrations on the bench really aren't the point.
@Piano194 The trouble with classical music at RUclips is that there's always some guy (it's always a guy) who has been appointed by God to point out the flaws (as imagined by him) in a performance by a celebrated artist. Of course, when you click on the critic's channel, he invariably has nothing to show for his soi-disant genius.
It seems typical for some poor apple with no talent or ability to gain self-esteem on the cheap by deprecating the accomplishments of gifted people.
4:07 lol
is it me or it sounds like he's putting arpeggiated chords all over the place?
Good playing without looking at you. lol
I like David Fung's version better.
what about following what the composer wrote in the score? a fortissimo when Ravel says pianissimo? - that's called arrogance.
Otherwise, very impressive pianism....