There seems to be some misunderstanding in my 3rd point “expensive cameras”. Obviously an expensive camera IS better than a cheap one However! My point is, whatever your budget for investing in a camera setup is, don’t spend all of it on the camera body. This is true if you have $500 or $5000 to put into it. Make sure you leave room in your budget to buy lenses, lighting, audio etc. rather than spending 99% of your budget on the camera body. Because you will get better images and videos with higher quality lenses (and lenses hold their value far better than camera body’s so if you’re worried about loss on investment)
Thank you for clarifying your point-it makes complete sense now. I completely agree that budgeting for the entire setup, rather than spending almost everything on the camera body, is the smarter approach. Lenses, lighting, and audio can make an incredible difference in the overall quality of photos and videos, often more than the camera body itself. Your point about lenses holding their value better is also spot on. They’re not only a longer-term investment but also versatile across multiple camera bodies, making them a wiser choice when budgeting for a setup. Thanks for the insight-it’s an important reminder for anyone stepping into photography or videography! 👌
As a beginner videographer, I actually wish saved a bit more and bought a more expensive body because now I feel like I'm falling into the "buy cheap buy twice" area
It is true that there is a bottom level that you probably don’t wanna go below when buying a camera. Unfortunately though I’ve seen too many people go buy an a7siii as their first camera and then not enjoy it. But yeah you are right
@@blacknoire it's a pretty good beginners camera. Has very good AF but is 8 bit and no IBIS. If you're planning to mostly shoot on a tripod, then it's fine.
When I started over 20 years ago, I bought myself a D70 + 18-70 kit lens (legendary image quality for a kit lens) It served me well for over 10 years and finally upgraded to a D700 and eventually a D750, I'm actually at a point in my life where I now start to look at cheap and older cameras because of the influx of the Fuji trend. I was able to dig out my old Olympus E-PL3 and E-P1 and frankly I enjoy shooting on those more than I do with my DSLRs, heck I do a lot of client videography work with my rigged out iPhone. I do kind of agree with most of what you said in your video (especially about gimbals). I guess it's because I learned my fundamentals quite early on and I find gimbals more of a hassle than help. Fact of the matter is, invest in a good body and good lenses and they'll serve you well for years. Save buying the cheap stuff for when you're bored :)
As a beginner, who had no prior knowledge of anything photography/videography related before buying my first camera and lens a couple of months ago, I wouldn't even *know* what I needed, because I didn't know what features cameras have, which I would even need or what focal range I liked, because I didn't even know what focal range was. So I kind of like the idea of starting with a kit lens and cheap body to begin. The kit lens taught me what focal range is, how it affects composition, depth of field and whether I prefer a more wide or more telephoto look. It was frustrating taking pictures and filming when it was dark and having a lot of noise because of the slow kit lens, but it also pushed me to think creatively, buy some lights, a tripod for long exposure and shoot black and white photography in low light conditions, so the noise looks stylistic instead of a limitation. To me, the thing that frustrates me the most about my camera (Canon EOS R100) is comparing it to other cameras. It's the cheapest thing, with an APS-C sensor, no flippy screen and no IBIS. But since this is just a hobby and I haven't hit the ceiling even with this, I'll push it a bit further and keep learning.
About the ‘kit lens’ advice, I’d say that it applies to Sony and Canon mostly. Other brands offer really good/interesting kit lenses like Fujifilm, Panasonic and Nikon.
That's exactly what happen to me, I started as a Beginner with my lumix g7 and 5 years later of great work and as professional as I could, now I work with my Lumix s5ii and being happy with it! Beginners don't jump into the expensive options at first, learn to do it with the budget option and trust the process and eventually when you jump to a professional tool you'd be glad to do it!
Biggest beginner mistake is assuming something lesser is good to begin with when in reality you'll have to pay more money again to buy something else down the road. Buy something nice to begin with and then and it will be there alongside your learning journey. Why spend extra money for something lesser when you'll eventually have to spend again?
There’s a line between spending too much on a camera and too little as a beginner. As I said it’s about your budget. The section about “expensive cameras” is about not spending 99% of your budget (whether that’s big or small) on the camera body alone, which lots of people do. As I said if your budget is $1500 total, buying a $1500 camera body on its own isn’t as valuable as a slightly cheaper body with good lenses. The point is about working with the budget you have, not saying “buy bad cameras”
Do buy a kit lens, but don't buy new. Buy a camera with an 18-55mm or so kit lens that's ten or so years old, and learn how to use it. Really learn. If in six months this won't do something you need to do, then start shopping again. Keep that original setup for times when you need a basic kit you can afford to have damaged, lost, stolen, etc. If you decide to give up photography, you have a camera that had already suffered 90% of the deprecation it will ever suffer before you bought it, and you'll lose little or no money when you sell it on.
I've noticed this growing trend in "professional photography" content lately of buying cheaper equipment, and I wanted to share my perspective. I respectfully disagree with the advice to buy a cheap camera as a beginner-if you can afford it. From an investor's point of view, the goal is to invest in equipment that will provide long-term value. Purchasing a lower-end camera only to realize six months later that an upgrade is necessary seems counterproductive. Why buy twice when you could have made the right investment from the start? If you have the budget, investing in a higher-quality camera can be incredibly motivating. It reinforces your commitment to mastering the craft because you're financially invested in your growth as a photographer. Higher-end gear also tends to offer better image quality and advanced features, which not only improve your results but also widen the learning curve, allowing you to develop your skills more effectively. Additionally, premium camera equipment tends to hold its resale value well, giving you the option to sell it on platforms like eBay if you decide photography isn’t for you. On the other hand, cheaper gear often depreciates quickly, leaving you stuck with it if your interests shift. Ultimately, the key is making a thoughtful investment based on your goals and resources.
I completely agree with this perspective. Investing in higher-quality equipment from the start, if you can afford it, not only sets you up for long-term success but also minimizes the frustration of outgrowing your gear too quickly. A well-built camera with advanced features can help you unlock your creative potential early on, while also encouraging you to stay committed since you're already financially invested. Plus, the resale value point is key-quality gear holds its value much better, making it a smarter investment overall.
@@Ohhetheplug exactly! NOTE: I’m not saying you need to buy expensive equipment just to get started. However, if you can afford a good camera body from the beginning, you’re more likely to grow into your investment rather than outgrow it within six months and feel the need to upgrade. Plus, quality gear often holds its resale value better, making it a smarter long-term choice.
I think you missed the point of what i was saying, it’s more about using the budget you have correctly, rather than a blanket statement of “buy cheap/bad cameras” So obviously if you have lots of funds and money isn’t a concern, then yeah, get what you can. The problem is that MOST people, don’t have tons of money to throw at this as an investment, yet often feel pressure that if they don’t buy the biggest baddest camera even when it’s probably not within their budget. As i said in the video, you buy the camera that fits in your budget, leaving enough room for everything else you need to use the camera body properly. Lastly, in the used camera market, from my experience, the depreciation of equipment is not as you have said. A lot of higher end cameras lose their value as quickly if not sometimes slightly quicker than some less expensive cameras. It’s case by case and depends on the camera. The best place for investing in gear that doesn’t depreciate as much is lenses over camera body’s, they hold their value far better. Which is why I recommend working your budget to allow for good lenses that will last a lifetime rather than a camera body that people upgrade every couple of years whether they are cheap or expensive
Always enjoy your opinion and videos. One disagreement, the kit lens. Usually for a FF camera it will add about $200 to purchase, for an an APS-C camera about $100 add on. Using B&H dollars for Sony cameras, kit lenses new, not include with the camera are $400-$300 new respectively. Either way, you come out ahead including the kit lens. While they are not great, the Sony's include optical stabilization. When selling a camera to be able to include a lens, it is a good leg up and the kit lens is the perfect lens. I have used it as an overhead shot (parnoid camera will drop) and in other situations where camera and lens are in more danger. Sure there are other cheaper manual lenses available that do the same thing. But having a kit lens in your camera's ecosystem is a great thing. Mostly a backup lens but one I can get my money back and add value to the camera when it is ready to sell. Keep up the great work.
When I got my ZVE10 I was only planning on using it for video but found myself liking taking photos as well. I believe rigging makes it more enjoyable but it definitely adds up little by little.
Lovely video, another accessory that could be added is those special fx filters! Bought them thinking I would use them a lot, used once or twice and luckily I was able to resell them
Just bought my first "professional" camera, previous use being an iPhone. Found an XH2 with kit lens at an amazing price so that is what I'm starting with, also have a GoPro12 and DJI Mini Pro 3. Jumping to the XH2 has definitely been a learning curve, but 90% of my work is videography and post editing has proven to be the steeper learning curve. If I had advice for beginners doing video it would probably be learn something like Premier, Vegas, Davinci, because if the raw data is good (not perfect) you can have amazing results.
Another good idea is to buy used cameras. If you buy a $1500 camera brand new, you can't sell it for more than $1000 in 2 months by the time you realize whether you like it. But if you're buying used, you can get old but great cameras that have already lost their initial value and you can use them for months if not years and sell them for the same price you bought them at.
Jup, I started woth the 650d my wife had when i met her 10 years ago and i used it for 9 years until i bought a brand new a74 in december 2023 which was a huge but great investment. I tried different lenses on the 650d and had an idea what i wanted for the a74. Really loving it. I think a cheap camera to start out and to learn all the basocs and to see if it is something you want to continue foing its the best to not invest too much. Get a used camera woth a good lens and see what happens, then eventually invest in something really nice and always do your research before purchasing. I read for month on all the cameras. Almost bought an a7s3 and im glad i did go for the a74 because thats what i actually wanted.
I have to say that I would encourage you to get the kit lens if you are starting out. On the ZV-E10 I started with the 16-50 kit lens for the added $100 to the camera cost. I used it to see what setting I used the most which for me was 30mm and then I bought the Sigma 30mm f/1.4. The kit lens is still good for family photos when outdoors or well lit areas. If it just sit on the shelf, sell it for $70 bucks and get some money back. I use mine to train other people how to use a camera with the E10 now that I have moved on to the a6700 and IBIS.
When I just started photography, having a cheaper camera made me miss out on a lot of opportunities. If someone had a project that they wanted help on, They wouldn't even let me do free work because they can't have a second shooter shooting at a lower quality. And now I don't really have the time to be doing excessive free work to build a portfolio. IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT, GET IT, YOU CAN ALWAYS SELL IT BACK.
I have a ZV-E10, and I think it's a perfect camera for the budget. Since I have no clue about lenses, I bought what other RUclipsrs (especially Mark Bennett's Camera Crisis) recommended, and now I have a Sigma 16mm 1.4 and a Tamron 17-70. For my video work, they are both great. But the ZV-E10 without a gimbal sucks... What would you consider an alternative if you want more dynamic shots like for a music video?
you would still need a gimbal even if you got a camera with ibis. ibis is good and increases stability a bit, but it is not 100% enough. so no worries there.
I used gimbal when i was kind of a beginner. Many years later today, i find myself too dependent on gimbals and forgot to just keep the camera still or just not trained enough to get smooth handheld shots.
Om namaste precious. Please tell me how to correctly set the aspect ratio 2:1 in the FC editing program, provided that the original format is, for example, 4K 3840x2160. If you calculate 3840, divide it in half and set these values in the editing program, then the footage itself is cropped with black frames automatically adjusting to these settings. Thank you
oh man... my biggest regret (at this moment) is the raveneye for the dji rs3 gimbal. great product dont get me wrong but i picked up a zv-e10 ii and its not compatible. gonna be picking up a gen 1 zv-e10 but at the moment it feels like a waste. instead of a v-mount battery i grabbed a portable battery and a phone clamp so i can mount it on my camera rig. works pretty good for a faction of the price. another banger fam!! keep em comin!!
Hey Thomas, so in my beginner experience I had a horrible case of the G.A.S. So I literally bought everything, only to be overwhelmed and also never use most of the expensive stuff 🤣😂… I was getting it thinking of situations that I might use it in, but then realized I won’t be in those situations much to begin with… admittedly I bought the UV filter too, only to never use it, because I had bought a vnd too only to realize I shoot mostly parties at night or mostly low light stuff🤣😂… I think my biggest mistake buy was the “nucleus nano II”.. I bought it in July of last year(this is when I started, so I’m still a beginner) and to this very day I have not used it not even once 😩😩…. So my word to the other beginner like me out there, for now just focus on your camera, a lens, some for of audio microphone, an sd card and a laptop to edit on and most importantly invest in the educational aspect of the craft, wether it be RUclips vids or take a course .. just shoot as much as you can to find your groove and then decide what you need to improve your skill… Thanks for coming to my Ted talk 😅
I chose a6400 over a6600, because I want to buy 18-105 F4 lens to cover wide range of focal length, and it's worth it. next I bought some diopters filter and portable light. Camera cage and anamorphic flare filter its helping me a lot to mount my mic (zoom h1n) so it doesn't get in the screen. I will buy small table top tripod next because it's so convenience to carry daily. As V mount battery option, I could used some powerbank to power my camera and mic, it's way lot cheaper, A LOT 😅
A camera is just a tool, it is our eyes that do the heavy lifting. Photography is light, composition, framing and practice, practice, practice. Nevertheless a picture has two sides the one taking it and the one viewing it... I never heard anybody say: oh that 10k Hasselblad really made the picture
film with your phone until you make enough from youtube to afford an expensive camera which is also the time you realize you don't need and expensive camera.
Yeah, agree with most of that tho i reckon the perfect beginners camera might be an a6700 :) gives them room to grow then also apsc lenses are cheap to save up for, v30 200mbs cards that are cheap and will get you 60fps at 10bit :))))
Get a camera with IBIS. If you are like me don’t buy the ZV-E10 or the new version of it if you plan to shoot Handheld. There are a few cameras under $1500 that have IBIS and that will mean you have a 20% better chance of getting the shot you want. I get almost 100% of my shots with the a6700 vs the 85% I got with the E10 handheld. The E10 is ok if you are using mono/tripod.
I just grabbed the Sony ZVE10 Mark II with the $100 kit lens. Im so new too cameras that it blew me away haha. Im coming from the Sony ZV-1F lol. Coming from that camera it didnt take much to impress me. it was my very first camera that I bought 3 months ago.
Love the video... in my pov working since 2000s with the t3i then 5d mark ii then 5ds then EOS R and Black magic pocket 4k the best best best inversion are good Lenses en first place and Ligth (mid-high) in second. Because bodies drop the price every 6 months to a Year and lenses go up or stay in price because the new ones are super expensives. Everybody can work with one ligth and if you keep buying in one point you will have 3 or 5 lights to work . If you want a pro body you can buy a "old" body and will give you graet results. If Historical picture were taken with 1/8 of our technology, Why can you work with an 8-5 years old camera?
For sure! There were a few comments saying that expensive bodies are a better investment that expensive lenses from a “financial investor” point of view, but most people don’t realize how well lenses hold their value, and how quickly camera body’s lose them!
In my country the a7iii is 1400 euro and the a7iv is 2.100 euro! I only want to use it for photography, is it worth to save more for the a7iv,or buy better glass ?
In a perfect world the wait and save for an a7iv and good glass. If you can only get one or the other, I’d either check used prices to see if you could get a better deal, but I’d recommend better glass, then work and save so when an a7v comes out, you can sell the a7iii and upgrade if you wish to
between a7iii and a7iv there has been a software update on the Sony systems. but for photography only, I would choose a7iii with better lenses if I were you. you do not see the difference the lenses make until you see them. but if you will also use it for videography, then maybe wait for a7V to see its features and price before maybe getting the discounted a7iv.
Thanks for the video Thomas, I'm making videos for RUclips and have traditionally worked with action cams but I want to improve the quality of the content both in picture quality and sound (which I know a lot about) so am considering adopting a 'cinematographer' approach to filming. I can only afford one A camera to work along side the action cams so... Sony ZV-E10 (second hand), XLR adaptor, a couple of short prime lenses and build it in to a rig??? Do you think I am heading in the right direction?
Tell me a bit more about the xlr adapter. The zve10 won’t be able to provide phantom power through the mic port if you’re hoping to use a condenser mic. I would advise getting a camera designed mic like a rode video micro/mic go ii or something
@@thomasjmcclure Thanks for the reply... many years ago I had a Sony DSR-PDX10P camcorder and used it for 'gorilla' style shooting, I loved the ability to use a wide selection of mics and would like my new rig to be able to scratch that itch again... but without the Mini DV tapes! I have little or no idea whats available now or in the recent second hand market :-)
well you might try Fuji xm-5 and xs-20 also if you are into cinematographer as Fuji colors are superior to any other in the market. I am still trying to make LUTs to achieve Fuji colors on Sony photos. also if you go the Fuji way, check if their autofocus has been fixed.
@ I may or may not be getting my hands on an XM5 to see what the fuss is all about. as far as "have the best colors" every camera brand claim it, they're all just different so its a matter of preference, and as someone who never uses straight out of camera colors, I tweak them enough that it ultimately doesn't matter too much
I think beginners should start by experimenting with their phones first. Take as many photos as possible using your phone. Once you've taken enough photos, you'll identify your preferred photography genre, which will help determine your needs and guide you in choosing the right camera. For example, I enjoy shooting outdoor portraits. If I could choose again, I would buy a pro-series full-frame body instead of an entry-level crop body. A full-frame offers better ISO performance, stronger ergonomics, better portrait background blur, and allows for slower shutter speeds compared to crop bodies, enabling more light to be captured. If you use an entry-level camera, you'll quickly reach its limits and end up upgrading to a full-frame anyway, so it’s better to invest in one from the start. Next is the lens. I’ve realized that a kit lens with an aperture of 5.6 struggles to produce beautiful photos. A prime lens with a large aperture makes it easier to achieve stunning results, but it’s not versatile in every situation. The most balanced option is a zoom lens with a 2.8 aperture. That’s my experience. However, if you’re into bird or wildlife photography, you might need a crop body and a telephoto lens. In summary, understand your needs and try to invest in a strong body and good lenses right from the beginning to avoid upgrading later.
Well I thought of getting a FF but ended up with a higher end APSC (Sony a6700). Now I am happier as I do not need FF that much, only enough light to do some video and that is all. The whole system is pretty light weight and portable.
The FOMO is real. I purchased a used Z30 body back in Nov. Then a used lense. But since getting the camera, I've had to fight my impulses almost every day. Lol. Ended up with a cage, top handle, sennheiser 400 and the cheapest tripod small rig had on sale. Then i had to stop myself. Really would like a monitor, but holding off until I start recording outdoors more.
you can use a phone in place of a monitor. I was the same, got the cage (sirui), top handle (small rig), side handle, nato rails, a takstar mic (audio can be fixed in the montage 😅 so I went cheap there, with no problems), cheap big tripod (works well). getting a portable battery instead of v-mount is also the cheaper way that works. then pouring the money onto the lenses is my aim. I can give suggestions about going the software route also, post-processing is also very real and changes a lot. getting prime lenses of target focus lengths are the cheapest way in terms of hardware, but after that learning software (photoshop and lightroom for photos, adobe premiere, final cut, davinci etc for video) also helps alot.
Rigs are super fun, but expensive. So it’s really down to whether it makes sense for you to put your money into that. If you have the money and you want it, go for it, but if you think it would be better spent on lenses, lighting or audio then technically that maaaaay make more sense
My list as a run and gun shooter DROP: rig, heavy camera bodies, heavy zoom lens. Tripod.. big batteries, Buy: light camera bodies, gimbal, light lenses, nd filters.
I definitely think the downfall of beginner purchases is lack of knowledge around accessories and gear. In my case, I bought a blogger gimbal and a K&F pack of lens filters. I ended up selling the gimbal for extremely less than I spent due to not using it for too long, and I'd rather point people in the direction of better filters and other accessories that will be a more long-term, beneficial purchase. For example, my first ND filter isn't variable, and 58mm thread. In comparison, something like a Nisi TruColor at a 82mm thread with some adapter rings is a greater value addition to the camera bag. And obviously, it changes for everybody within their niche and style, but we all definitely get into the Amazon bundle rabbit hole 😂
I am a beginner videographer and bought my ZV-E10 with Kitlense for 400€ (412$) (used on Kleinanzeigen) The Sony 50/1.8 for 145€ on Amazon (new) The Sony 55-210/4.5-6.3 for 189€ on Amazon (new) The RS3 mini for 214€ on Amazon (open box) I love my ZV-E10, the RS3 mini and the 50mm Prime. But that zoom lens’s was completely unnecessary for video 😂 Ended up renting a sigma 16mm/1.4 from Grover (21€/month) and now I know: on APS-C you first need wide lenses 😅 Since the camera has no IBIS the gimbal is like permanently attached to my Sony 😂 Used it to film my kids in the snow, some corporate events and a little bit of nature nearby
Huge misconception about "not needing" or "overkill" equipment in the camera/photography industry when in reality you're paying for solutions. The user technically can overcome problems you may run into with cheaper equipment: noise (light room edits), mega pixels, speed, etc.. but reality is that the cheaper your product the more work it is likely to take arriving at the final image you wanted. $10,000 cameras don't create beautiful images, but they surely bring you closer to the finish line as a starting point and depending on the time on your hands or personal experience in this industry, you may be able to get away with cheaper equipment. Like the video, however disagree on "overrated" equipment. It's bought because when you gather more experience, you have nothing to grow into. It's just another purchase down the road. Again, good job on the video itself.
I agree, the video is about gear that’s specifically “overrated for beginners”. As I say at the start, a lot of these things are good, just not necessarily what you may neeeeed when you’re buying your first camera
Where did you get a sigma 16mm lens for like under 200 ???? Give me the link plz 😂 because I’m your biggest fan because of your videos i started with Sony zv e 10 that why !!!!! I live in Europe everything is expensive here 😂
Most important. Think and research well about apsc and full frame and your camera brand. Once u bought that cam u will buy lenses on same brand and u can not go back anymore or u waste ur money
I don’t agree. The cheaper body and bettter lens concept used to work for photography but for video today, more money you put the better you get. Pls specify if you are talking about photography only.
I agree that the more money you put in, the better you get, obviously. But a lot of people don’t spend their money in the right places. As I said if your budget is $1500 total, buying a $1500 camera body on its own isn’t as valuable as a slightly cheaper body with good lenses. The point is about working with the budget you have, not saying “buy bad cameras”
Could do yeah! That would take a bit of testing because I know in theory how they can be different, but in practice it’s hard to know how much difference they make!
@@thomasjmcclure What benefits you the least benefits you the most, because when you give you receive. The man above appreciates that. I'm trying to do the same but haven't begun on this path yet. So it's satisfying when I see others do it.
I think the 24-70 on FF, 16-50 on an APSC are the essential kit lenses if the person is really new to cameras. these lenses are mostly the cheaper ones.
Definitely an exaggeration, I’m meaning expensive cameras in comparison to the rest of their camera kit (for beginners), mainly trying to emphasize that people put 99% of their budget into a camera body, when realistically you need to put more of your budget into lenses, lighting, audio etc. it’ll produce a “better” image
@@martinpickard5818 of course! This video is about absolute beginners who are just buying their first camera and not quite sure where they wanna go yet. I’ve just seen too many people buy super expensive cameras and have nothing but a cheap kit lens, when they’d probably be better off buying a less expensive camera and allocating the rest of their budget elsewhere
@ I agree to a degree.I shot pro motorsport for twelve years and started with a Nikon d3100 with decent glass.The results were horrendous and nearly put me off.When I was asked for advice on this genre I always advised getting a decent mid range slightly more expensive camera to start and see how you get on.I evolved to 2 Nikon d4s bodies,then switched systems to Sony and the a9’s…But you are right in most cases and decent lenses are invaluable.Have a great day.
Yeah I’m not saying expensive cameras are bad, it’s more about working within your given budget (different for everyone) and getting what you need rather than putting it all into 1 part. But yeah there are times when people do under invest in their camera body too
I have to say that I would encourage you to get the kit lens if you are starting out. On the ZV-E10 I started with the 16-50 kit lens for the added $100 to the camera cost. I used it to see what setting I used the most which for me was 30mm and then I bought the Sigma 30mm f/1.4. The kit lens is still good for family photos when outdoors or well lit areas. If it just sit on the shelf, sell it for $70 bucks and get some money back. I use mine to train other people how to use a camera with the E10 now that I have moved on to the a6700 and IBIS.
There seems to be some misunderstanding in my 3rd point “expensive cameras”. Obviously an expensive camera IS better than a cheap one
However! My point is, whatever your budget for investing in a camera setup is, don’t spend all of it on the camera body. This is true if you have $500 or $5000 to put into it.
Make sure you leave room in your budget to buy lenses, lighting, audio etc. rather than spending 99% of your budget on the camera body. Because you will get better images and videos with higher quality lenses (and lenses hold their value far better than camera body’s so if you’re worried about loss on investment)
Thank you for clarifying your point-it makes complete sense now. I completely agree that budgeting for the entire setup, rather than spending almost everything on the camera body, is the smarter approach. Lenses, lighting, and audio can make an incredible difference in the overall quality of photos and videos, often more than the camera body itself.
Your point about lenses holding their value better is also spot on. They’re not only a longer-term investment but also versatile across multiple camera bodies, making them a wiser choice when budgeting for a setup. Thanks for the insight-it’s an important reminder for anyone stepping into photography or videography! 👌
As a beginner videographer, I actually wish saved a bit more and bought a more expensive body because now I feel like I'm falling into the "buy cheap buy twice" area
It is true that there is a bottom level that you probably don’t wanna go below when buying a camera. Unfortunately though I’ve seen too many people go buy an a7siii as their first camera and then not enjoy it. But yeah you are right
Get a used GH5 if you don't mind manually focussing. You're set for a long time.
@@Wildridefilmsjust about to purchase a zve10 as my first camera, £350 secondhand...is this a good buy?
@@blacknoire it's a pretty good beginners camera. Has very good AF but is 8 bit and no IBIS. If you're planning to mostly shoot on a tripod, then it's fine.
When I started over 20 years ago, I bought myself a D70 + 18-70 kit lens (legendary image quality for a kit lens) It served me well for over 10 years and finally upgraded to a D700 and eventually a D750, I'm actually at a point in my life where I now start to look at cheap and older cameras because of the influx of the Fuji trend. I was able to dig out my old Olympus E-PL3 and E-P1 and frankly I enjoy shooting on those more than I do with my DSLRs, heck I do a lot of client videography work with my rigged out iPhone. I do kind of agree with most of what you said in your video (especially about gimbals). I guess it's because I learned my fundamentals quite early on and I find gimbals more of a hassle than help.
Fact of the matter is, invest in a good body and good lenses and they'll serve you well for years. Save buying the cheap stuff for when you're bored :)
As a beginner, who had no prior knowledge of anything photography/videography related before buying my first camera and lens a couple of months ago, I wouldn't even *know* what I needed, because I didn't know what features cameras have, which I would even need or what focal range I liked, because I didn't even know what focal range was.
So I kind of like the idea of starting with a kit lens and cheap body to begin. The kit lens taught me what focal range is, how it affects composition, depth of field and whether I prefer a more wide or more telephoto look.
It was frustrating taking pictures and filming when it was dark and having a lot of noise because of the slow kit lens, but it also pushed me to think creatively, buy some lights, a tripod for long exposure and shoot black and white photography in low light conditions, so the noise looks stylistic instead of a limitation.
To me, the thing that frustrates me the most about my camera (Canon EOS R100) is comparing it to other cameras. It's the cheapest thing, with an APS-C sensor, no flippy screen and no IBIS. But since this is just a hobby and I haven't hit the ceiling even with this, I'll push it a bit further and keep learning.
About the ‘kit lens’ advice, I’d say that it applies to Sony and Canon mostly. Other brands offer really good/interesting kit lenses like Fujifilm, Panasonic and Nikon.
That's exactly what happen to me, I started as a Beginner with my lumix g7 and 5 years later of great work and as professional as I could, now I work with my Lumix s5ii and being happy with it! Beginners don't jump into the expensive options at first, learn to do it with the budget option and trust the process and eventually when you jump to a professional tool you'd be glad to do it!
why did you get all panasonic I did not understand. Panasonic has low battery and for lenses Sony is much better.
Biggest beginner mistake is assuming something lesser is good to begin with when in reality you'll have to pay more money again to buy something else down the road. Buy something nice to begin with and then and it will be there alongside your learning journey. Why spend extra money for something lesser when you'll eventually have to spend again?
There’s a line between spending too much on a camera and too little as a beginner. As I said it’s about your budget. The section about “expensive cameras” is about not spending 99% of your budget (whether that’s big or small) on the camera body alone, which lots of people do.
As I said if your budget is $1500 total, buying a $1500 camera body on its own isn’t as valuable as a slightly cheaper body with good lenses. The point is about working with the budget you have, not saying “buy bad cameras”
Do buy a kit lens, but don't buy new. Buy a camera with an 18-55mm or so kit lens that's ten or so years old, and learn how to use it. Really learn. If in six months this won't do something you need to do, then start shopping again. Keep that original setup for times when you need a basic kit you can afford to have damaged, lost, stolen, etc. If you decide to give up photography, you have a camera that had already suffered 90% of the deprecation it will ever suffer before you bought it, and you'll lose little or no money when you sell it on.
Relate to this! Thanks! Looking for basics that give me great results
I've noticed this growing trend in "professional photography" content lately of buying cheaper equipment, and I wanted to share my perspective. I respectfully disagree with the advice to buy a cheap camera as a beginner-if you can afford it. From an investor's point of view, the goal is to invest in equipment that will provide long-term value. Purchasing a lower-end camera only to realize six months later that an upgrade is necessary seems counterproductive. Why buy twice when you could have made the right investment from the start?
If you have the budget, investing in a higher-quality camera can be incredibly motivating. It reinforces your commitment to mastering the craft because you're financially invested in your growth as a photographer. Higher-end gear also tends to offer better image quality and advanced features, which not only improve your results but also widen the learning curve, allowing you to develop your skills more effectively.
Additionally, premium camera equipment tends to hold its resale value well, giving you the option to sell it on platforms like eBay if you decide photography isn’t for you. On the other hand, cheaper gear often depreciates quickly, leaving you stuck with it if your interests shift.
Ultimately, the key is making a thoughtful investment based on your goals and resources.
I completely agree with this perspective. Investing in higher-quality equipment from the start, if you can afford it, not only sets you up for long-term success but also minimizes the frustration of outgrowing your gear too quickly. A well-built camera with advanced features can help you unlock your creative potential early on, while also encouraging you to stay committed since you're already financially invested. Plus, the resale value point is key-quality gear holds its value much better, making it a smarter investment overall.
As a “professional photographer” I approve the message lol
@@Ohhetheplug exactly! NOTE: I’m not saying you need to buy expensive equipment just to get started. However, if you can afford a good camera body from the beginning, you’re more likely to grow into your investment rather than outgrow it within six months and feel the need to upgrade. Plus, quality gear often holds its resale value better, making it a smarter long-term choice.
I think you missed the point of what i was saying, it’s more about using the budget you have correctly, rather than a blanket statement of “buy cheap/bad cameras”
So obviously if you have lots of funds and money isn’t a concern, then yeah, get what you can. The problem is that MOST people, don’t have tons of money to throw at this as an investment, yet often feel pressure that if they don’t buy the biggest baddest camera even when it’s probably not within their budget.
As i said in the video, you buy the camera that fits in your budget, leaving enough room for everything else you need to use the camera body properly.
Lastly, in the used camera market, from my experience, the depreciation of equipment is not as you have said. A lot of higher end cameras lose their value as quickly if not sometimes slightly quicker than some less expensive cameras. It’s case by case and depends on the camera. The best place for investing in gear that doesn’t depreciate as much is lenses over camera body’s, they hold their value far better. Which is why I recommend working your budget to allow for good lenses that will last a lifetime rather than a camera body that people upgrade every couple of years whether they are cheap or expensive
Better buy good lenses since camera technology evolves more rapidly than lenses.
Always enjoy your opinion and videos. One disagreement, the kit lens. Usually for a FF camera it will add about $200 to purchase, for an an APS-C camera about $100 add on. Using B&H dollars for Sony cameras, kit lenses new, not include with the camera are $400-$300 new respectively. Either way, you come out ahead including the kit lens. While they are not great, the Sony's include optical stabilization. When selling a camera to be able to include a lens, it is a good leg up and the kit lens is the perfect lens. I have used it as an overhead shot (parnoid camera will drop) and in other situations where camera and lens are in more danger. Sure there are other cheaper manual lenses available that do the same thing. But having a kit lens in your camera's ecosystem is a great thing. Mostly a backup lens but one I can get my money back and add value to the camera when it is ready to sell. Keep up the great work.
When I got my ZVE10 I was only planning on using it for video but found myself liking taking photos as well. I believe rigging makes it more enjoyable but it definitely adds up little by little.
Lovely video, another accessory that could be added is those special fx filters! Bought them thinking I would use them a lot, used once or twice and luckily I was able to resell them
Just bought my first "professional" camera, previous use being an iPhone. Found an XH2 with kit lens at an amazing price so that is what I'm starting with, also have a GoPro12 and DJI Mini Pro 3. Jumping to the XH2 has definitely been a learning curve, but 90% of my work is videography and post editing has proven to be the steeper learning curve. If I had advice for beginners doing video it would probably be learn something like Premier, Vegas, Davinci, because if the raw data is good (not perfect) you can have amazing results.
Another good idea is to buy used cameras. If you buy a $1500 camera brand new, you can't sell it for more than $1000 in 2 months by the time you realize whether you like it.
But if you're buying used, you can get old but great cameras that have already lost their initial value and you can use them for months if not years and sell them for the same price you bought them at.
Buying used is so valuable!
Jup, I started woth the 650d my wife had when i met her 10 years ago and i used it for 9 years until i bought a brand new a74 in december 2023 which was a huge but great investment. I tried different lenses on the 650d and had an idea what i wanted for the a74. Really loving it. I think a cheap camera to start out and to learn all the basocs and to see if it is something you want to continue foing its the best to not invest too much. Get a used camera woth a good lens and see what happens, then eventually invest in something really nice and always do your research before purchasing. I read for month on all the cameras. Almost bought an a7s3 and im glad i did go for the a74 because thats what i actually wanted.
I have to say that I would encourage you to get the kit lens if you are starting out. On the ZV-E10 I started with the 16-50 kit lens for the added $100 to the camera cost. I used it to see what setting I used the most which for me was 30mm and then I bought the Sigma 30mm f/1.4.
The kit lens is still good for family photos when outdoors or well lit areas. If it just sit on the shelf, sell it for $70 bucks and get some money back. I use mine to train other people how to use a camera with the E10 now that I have moved on to the a6700 and IBIS.
Lots of good points as always. Get a good lens over camera body for sure!
When I just started photography, having a cheaper camera made me miss out on a lot of opportunities. If someone had a project that they wanted help on, They wouldn't even let me do free work because they can't have a second shooter shooting at a lower quality. And now I don't really have the time to be doing excessive free work to build a portfolio. IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT, GET IT, YOU CAN ALWAYS SELL IT BACK.
I have a ZV-E10, and I think it's a perfect camera for the budget. Since I have no clue about lenses, I bought what other RUclipsrs (especially Mark Bennett's Camera Crisis) recommended, and now I have a Sigma 16mm 1.4 and a Tamron 17-70. For my video work, they are both great. But the ZV-E10 without a gimbal sucks... What would you consider an alternative if you want more dynamic shots like for a music video?
you would still need a gimbal even if you got a camera with ibis. ibis is good and increases stability a bit, but it is not 100% enough. so no worries there.
I used gimbal when i was kind of a beginner. Many years later today, i find myself too dependent on gimbals and forgot to just keep the camera still or just not trained enough to get smooth handheld shots.
Om namaste precious.
Please tell me how to correctly set the aspect ratio 2:1 in the FC editing program, provided that the original format is, for example, 4K 3840x2160.
If you calculate 3840, divide it in half and set these values in the editing program, then the footage itself is cropped with black frames automatically adjusting to these settings.
Thank you
oh man... my biggest regret (at this moment) is the raveneye for the dji rs3 gimbal. great product dont get me wrong but i picked up a zv-e10 ii and its not compatible. gonna be picking up a gen 1 zv-e10 but at the moment it feels like a waste. instead of a v-mount battery i grabbed a portable battery and a phone clamp so i can mount it on my camera rig. works pretty good for a faction of the price. another banger fam!! keep em comin!!
Hey Thomas, so in my beginner experience I had a horrible case of the G.A.S. So I literally bought everything, only to be overwhelmed and also never use most of the expensive stuff 🤣😂… I was getting it thinking of situations that I might use it in, but then realized I won’t be in those situations much to begin with… admittedly I bought the UV filter too, only to never use it, because I had bought a vnd too only to realize I shoot mostly parties at night or mostly low light stuff🤣😂… I think my biggest mistake buy was the “nucleus nano II”.. I bought it in July of last year(this is when I started, so I’m still a beginner) and to this very day I have not used it not even once 😩😩…. So my word to the other beginner like me out there, for now just focus on your camera, a lens, some for of audio microphone, an sd card and a laptop to edit on and most importantly invest in the educational aspect of the craft, wether it be RUclips vids or take a course .. just shoot as much as you can to find your groove and then decide what you need to improve your skill… Thanks for coming to my Ted talk 😅
I chose a6400 over a6600, because I want to buy 18-105 F4 lens to cover wide range of focal length, and it's worth it. next I bought some diopters filter and portable light. Camera cage and anamorphic flare filter its helping me a lot to mount my mic (zoom h1n) so it doesn't get in the screen. I will buy small table top tripod next because it's so convenience to carry daily. As V mount battery option, I could used some powerbank to power my camera and mic, it's way lot cheaper, A LOT 😅
A camera is just a tool, it is our eyes that do the heavy lifting. Photography is light, composition, framing and practice, practice, practice. Nevertheless a picture has two sides the one taking it and the one viewing it... I never heard anybody say: oh that 10k Hasselblad really made the picture
For sure, but a 10k hassleblad would be pretty sweet lol
film with your phone until you make enough from youtube to afford an expensive camera which is also the time you realize you don't need and expensive camera.
Yeah, agree with most of that tho i reckon the perfect beginners camera might be an a6700 :) gives them room to grow then also apsc lenses are cheap to save up for, v30 200mbs cards that are cheap and will get you 60fps at 10bit :))))
I definitely haven’t been getting much use out of my two gimbals. 🙂 Good point.
Get a camera with IBIS. If you are like me don’t buy the ZV-E10 or the new version of it if you plan to shoot Handheld. There are a few cameras under $1500 that have IBIS and that will mean you have a 20% better chance of getting the shot you want. I get almost 100% of my shots with the a6700 vs the 85% I got with the E10 handheld. The E10 is ok if you are using mono/tripod.
I just grabbed the Sony ZVE10 Mark II with the $100 kit lens. Im so new too cameras that it blew me away haha. Im coming from the Sony ZV-1F lol. Coming from that camera it didnt take much to impress me. it was my very first camera that I bought 3 months ago.
Thanks from Switzerland 👌🏼☺️📷🇨🇭❗️
Love the video... in my pov working since 2000s with the t3i then 5d mark ii then 5ds then EOS R and Black magic pocket 4k the best best best inversion are good Lenses en first place and Ligth (mid-high) in second. Because bodies drop the price every 6 months to a Year and lenses go up or stay in price because the new ones are super expensives. Everybody can work with one ligth and if you keep buying in one point you will have 3 or 5 lights to work . If you want a pro body you can buy a "old" body and will give you graet results. If Historical picture were taken with 1/8 of our technology, Why can you work with an 8-5 years old camera?
For sure! There were a few comments saying that expensive bodies are a better investment that expensive lenses from a “financial investor” point of view, but most people don’t realize how well lenses hold their value, and how quickly camera body’s lose them!
In my country the a7iii is 1400 euro and the a7iv is 2.100 euro! I only want to use it for photography, is it worth to save more for the a7iv,or buy better glass ?
In a perfect world the wait and save for an a7iv and good glass. If you can only get one or the other, I’d either check used prices to see if you could get a better deal, but I’d recommend better glass, then work and save so when an a7v comes out, you can sell the a7iii and upgrade if you wish to
between a7iii and a7iv there has been a software update on the Sony systems. but for photography only, I would choose a7iii with better lenses if I were you. you do not see the difference the lenses make until you see them. but if you will also use it for videography, then maybe wait for a7V to see its features and price before maybe getting the discounted a7iv.
Awesome video. Loved this info, wished I had seen it earlier. My gimbal is collecting dust.
Haha it’s often the case. Nice to have when you need it though!
Thanks man, solid advices
Thanks for the video Thomas, I'm making videos for RUclips and have traditionally worked with action cams but I want to improve the quality of the content both in picture quality and sound (which I know a lot about) so am considering adopting a 'cinematographer' approach to filming. I can only afford one A camera to work along side the action cams so... Sony ZV-E10 (second hand), XLR adaptor, a couple of short prime lenses and build it in to a rig??? Do you think I am heading in the right direction?
Tell me a bit more about the xlr adapter. The zve10 won’t be able to provide phantom power through the mic port if you’re hoping to use a condenser mic. I would advise getting a camera designed mic like a rode video micro/mic go ii or something
@@thomasjmcclure Thanks for the reply... many years ago I had a Sony DSR-PDX10P camcorder and used it for 'gorilla' style shooting, I loved the ability to use a wide selection of mics and would like my new rig to be able to scratch that itch again... but without the Mini DV tapes! I have little or no idea whats available now or in the recent second hand market :-)
well you might try Fuji xm-5 and xs-20 also if you are into cinematographer as Fuji colors are superior to any other in the market. I am still trying to make LUTs to achieve Fuji colors on Sony photos. also if you go the Fuji way, check if their autofocus has been fixed.
@ I may or may not be getting my hands on an XM5 to see what the fuss is all about. as far as "have the best colors" every camera brand claim it, they're all just different so its a matter of preference, and as someone who never uses straight out of camera colors, I tweak them enough that it ultimately doesn't matter too much
@@thomasjmcclure Fuji cameras have different cinematic colors inbuilt so soc photos are highly usable without post editing.
I think beginners should start by experimenting with their phones first. Take as many photos as possible using your phone. Once you've taken enough photos, you'll identify your preferred photography genre, which will help determine your needs and guide you in choosing the right camera. For example, I enjoy shooting outdoor portraits. If I could choose again, I would buy a pro-series full-frame body instead of an entry-level crop body. A full-frame offers better ISO performance, stronger ergonomics, better portrait background blur, and allows for slower shutter speeds compared to crop bodies, enabling more light to be captured.
If you use an entry-level camera, you'll quickly reach its limits and end up upgrading to a full-frame anyway, so it’s better to invest in one from the start. Next is the lens. I’ve realized that a kit lens with an aperture of 5.6 struggles to produce beautiful photos. A prime lens with a large aperture makes it easier to achieve stunning results, but it’s not versatile in every situation. The most balanced option is a zoom lens with a 2.8 aperture. That’s my experience. However, if you’re into bird or wildlife photography, you might need a crop body and a telephoto lens.
In summary, understand your needs and try to invest in a strong body and good lenses right from the beginning to avoid upgrading later.
Well I thought of getting a FF but ended up with a higher end APSC (Sony a6700). Now I am happier as I do not need FF that much, only enough light to do some video and that is all. The whole system is pretty light weight and portable.
The FOMO is real. I purchased a used Z30 body back in Nov. Then a used lense. But since getting the camera, I've had to fight my impulses almost every day. Lol. Ended up with a cage, top handle, sennheiser 400 and the cheapest tripod small rig had on sale. Then i had to stop myself. Really would like a monitor, but holding off until I start recording outdoors more.
you can use a phone in place of a monitor. I was the same, got the cage (sirui), top handle (small rig), side handle, nato rails, a takstar mic (audio can be fixed in the montage 😅 so I went cheap there, with no problems), cheap big tripod (works well). getting a portable battery instead of v-mount is also the cheaper way that works. then pouring the money onto the lenses is my aim.
I can give suggestions about going the software route also, post-processing is also very real and changes a lot. getting prime lenses of target focus lengths are the cheapest way in terms of hardware, but after that learning software (photoshop and lightroom for photos, adobe premiere, final cut, davinci etc for video) also helps alot.
Would you reccomend rigs for beginner videographers that know a bit, but still are learning how to film?
Rigs are super fun, but expensive. So it’s really down to whether it makes sense for you to put your money into that. If you have the money and you want it, go for it, but if you think it would be better spent on lenses, lighting or audio then technically that maaaaay make more sense
My list as a run and gun shooter DROP: rig, heavy camera bodies, heavy zoom lens. Tripod.. big batteries, Buy: light camera bodies, gimbal, light lenses, nd filters.
I’m still shooting my 5D Mk.II but I’ve invested in good glass.
I definitely think the downfall of beginner purchases is lack of knowledge around accessories and gear. In my case, I bought a blogger gimbal and a K&F pack of lens filters. I ended up selling the gimbal for extremely less than I spent due to not using it for too long, and I'd rather point people in the direction of better filters and other accessories that will be a more long-term, beneficial purchase. For example, my first ND filter isn't variable, and 58mm thread. In comparison, something like a Nisi TruColor at a 82mm thread with some adapter rings is a greater value addition to the camera bag. And obviously, it changes for everybody within their niche and style, but we all definitely get into the Amazon bundle rabbit hole 😂
For sure man!
I am a beginner videographer and bought my ZV-E10 with Kitlense for 400€ (412$) (used on Kleinanzeigen)
The Sony 50/1.8 for 145€ on Amazon (new)
The Sony 55-210/4.5-6.3 for 189€ on Amazon (new)
The RS3 mini for 214€ on Amazon (open box)
I love my ZV-E10, the RS3 mini and the 50mm Prime. But that zoom lens’s was completely unnecessary for video 😂
Ended up renting a sigma 16mm/1.4 from Grover (21€/month) and now I know: on APS-C you first need wide lenses 😅
Since the camera has no IBIS the gimbal is like permanently attached to my Sony 😂
Used it to film my kids in the snow, some corporate events and a little bit of nature nearby
Huge misconception about "not needing" or "overkill" equipment in the camera/photography industry when in reality you're paying for solutions. The user technically can overcome problems you may run into with cheaper equipment: noise (light room edits), mega pixels, speed, etc.. but reality is that the cheaper your product the more work it is likely to take arriving at the final image you wanted. $10,000 cameras don't create beautiful images, but they surely bring you closer to the finish line as a starting point and depending on the time on your hands or personal experience in this industry, you may be able to get away with cheaper equipment. Like the video, however disagree on "overrated" equipment. It's bought because when you gather more experience, you have nothing to grow into. It's just another purchase down the road. Again, good job on the video itself.
I agree, the video is about gear that’s specifically “overrated for beginners”. As I say at the start, a lot of these things are good, just not necessarily what you may neeeeed when you’re buying your first camera
Where did you get a sigma 16mm lens for like under 200 ???? Give me the link plz 😂 because I’m your biggest fan because of your videos i started with Sony zv e 10 that why !!!!! I live in Europe everything is expensive here 😂
The used market in America definitely works different to back home in Europe. I use Facebook marketplace quite alot
Most important. Think and research well about apsc and full frame and your camera brand. Once u bought that cam u will buy lenses on same brand and u can not go back anymore or u waste ur money
For sure! Been thinking about doing a video about choosing the right camera/brand for your specific needs. But there’s so many variables
Great video as always
Thanks!
I don’t agree.
The cheaper body and bettter lens concept used to work for photography but for video today, more money you put the better you get.
Pls specify if you are talking about photography only.
I agree that the more money you put in, the better you get, obviously. But a lot of people don’t spend their money in the right places. As I said if your budget is $1500 total, buying a $1500 camera body on its own isn’t as valuable as a slightly cheaper body with good lenses. The point is about working with the budget you have, not saying “buy bad cameras”
nowadays it means the change from full hd to 4k recording.
Could do yeah! That would take a bit of testing because I know in theory how they can be different, but in practice it’s hard to know how much difference they make!
Not buying niche lights or modifiers. You don’t need light tubes or spot lights yet
Great video, i always follow your channel
Thanks!
Nothing like honest sobering advice 🙌
I appreciate that! Technically a video like this benifits me the least, but i think it’s valuable!
@@thomasjmcclure What benefits you the least benefits you the most, because when you give you receive. The man above appreciates that. I'm trying to do the same but haven't begun on this path yet. So it's satisfying when I see others do it.
Great video vary helpful
Thanks!
i dont agree with the kit lens, most beginners dont even know the difference between each focal length.
Fair point. Probably should have included that people need to research and learn about things like focal lengths prior to a purchase.
I think the 24-70 on FF, 16-50 on an APSC are the essential kit lenses if the person is really new to cameras. these lenses are mostly the cheaper ones.
thanks for the vid! very helpful for someone showing the early symptoms of G.A.S. (gear acquisition syndrome) lol
😂
It’s a real thing!
I got my canon 60d second hand a 35-70 and a 75-300 for £300 $370
I wish I saw this video twenty years ago.❤
How can a camera body be “one of the least important parts to capture a decent image”…...without it you capture NOTHING…..
Definitely an exaggeration, I’m meaning expensive cameras in comparison to the rest of their camera kit (for beginners), mainly trying to emphasize that people put 99% of their budget into a camera body, when realistically you need to put more of your budget into lenses, lighting, audio etc. it’ll produce a “better” image
@ totally depends on the genre of photography/videography you want to get in to.
@@martinpickard5818 of course! This video is about absolute beginners who are just buying their first camera and not quite sure where they wanna go yet. I’ve just seen too many people buy super expensive cameras and have nothing but a cheap kit lens, when they’d probably be better off buying a less expensive camera and allocating the rest of their budget elsewhere
@ I agree to a degree.I shot pro motorsport for twelve years and started with a Nikon d3100 with decent glass.The results were horrendous and nearly put me off.When I was asked for advice on this genre I always advised getting a decent mid range slightly more expensive camera to start and see how you get on.I evolved to 2 Nikon d4s bodies,then switched systems to Sony and the a9’s…But you are right in most cases and decent lenses are invaluable.Have a great day.
Yeah I’m not saying expensive cameras are bad, it’s more about working within your given budget (different for everyone) and getting what you need rather than putting it all into 1 part. But yeah there are times when people do under invest in their camera body too
I watched the Forbidden Planet because of your videos.
Love that movie! Revolutionized the movie industry
howd I get here so fast
you talking to fast
I have to say that I would encourage you to get the kit lens if you are starting out. On the ZV-E10 I started with the 16-50 kit lens for the added $100 to the camera cost. I used it to see what setting I used the most which for me was 30mm and then I bought the Sigma 30mm f/1.4.
The kit lens is still good for family photos when outdoors or well lit areas. If it just sit on the shelf, sell it for $70 bucks and get some money back. I use mine to train other people how to use a camera with the E10 now that I have moved on to the a6700 and IBIS.