@@yungmentalproblems because they're the ones interfering in other countries and creating instability which causes mass migrations. Take Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan for example, they all have western intervention as common factor, therefore, western countries should accept the consequences too.
The powers that be have to maintain power. Refugees change the structure of the nation. Ukrainian people will maintain it. I think if u look at the laws of migration that changed after the Indian subcontinent joined the commonwealth. Britain immediately changed immigration std. Australia, New Zealand South Africa whites were fine. They were ex pats. Indians they were immigrants
@@michaelmcgee335 Yes. The same thing is happening in africa (ANTI-lgbt laws are being passed all over africa right now). one is about to be passed in my country (Ghana). This stems from christianity and homophobic laws being imposed on africans by europeans during the colonial era as well as (in recent years) far-right christian evangelicals from the U.S. going to african countries (and romania,hungary, and others) and pushing for anti-lgbt laws. basically trying to export homophobia/transphobia to vulnerable countries since they know it no longer flies in the west. Many african tribes have a well-documented history of sexual and gender fluidity pre colonial era. But this history has been eroded/being ignored due to brainwashing of africans with homophobia. Now african leaders are claiming that being LGBT is a white/western thing that the west is trying to force on africans (which is ironic). African leaders also claim christianity as being african while demonizing traditional african religions. Many of the problems we are seeing today stem from white supremacy/colonialism/racism.
Wholeheartedly pay attention to when Akala speaks and notice the captivation grasped in the room - you realise what a generational polymath this man is - for the crowd to applaud everytime this man speaks. Truly grateful to witness.
He blames the white guy for everything. Very popular narrative. Uganda hates gays white man’s fault Jamaica hates gays white man’s fault. This guy infantilises black people more than anyone I know he won’t even allow blacks to have their own hatred’s or bigotry’s only white man can have those.
As the descendent of the indians who faught in WW2, this rings very much true. Also much love to Akala, would love to have a conversation with him some day xx
@@DarthVader-xz2ni I know I am late to this conversation, but you mentioned he supported terror last year. How so? I was unaware of him until a few months ago. I also must ask, what people have been reigning terror on countries and continents for centuries? I haven’t even finished watching this video, but i/we ALL know who he is referring too. What say you about Britain reigning terror and colonizing/occupying other peoples land? Really just curious.
I don't know if anybody else is just now getting to this. This is my first time hearing and seeing this. I have trouble understanding what someone is saying when they speak and need to read along to truly understand the weight of their words when they speak of something as serious as human rights and systemic racism. If anyone out there is like me in that regard, I have written out a rough transcript of what was said. I think that, when we talk about race, we tend to focus on individual acts of prejudice. Which is why UKIP often comes up, because they overtly say stuff that we find offensive. Unfortunately, the issue of race, if we understand it, is a lot more insidious and it takes a lot more of a historical view to understand the difference between individual bias, and structural racism and privilege. The idea of Great Britain was intimately tied to the fact that Britain's invaded almost every country on the Earth, literally. Literally, there is a map; you can Google it. The idea of our greatness was intimately tied to this idea of empire, which was initimately tied to what Roger Kipling calls the "white man's burden": to go and "civilize" all these stupid brown folks who have been writing and having civilizations for thousands of years. But let's forget all of that. If we fast forward to today, when we talk about structural racism in Britain, do we have the same instutional disparities in rates of imprisonment that they have in America? Yes, absolutely we do. Do we have the same disparities in terms of who's dying to police custody? Yes indeed we do. In 2011, we were told we love Libyans so much, we wanted to bomb democracy into them. Less than five years later, we're leaving people fleeing the same conflict to drown in the sea, while giving a woman space in the national newspaper to refer to them as "cockroaches". When you refer to humans as cockroaches, that is a mandate for murder. Let's be clear about that. The moment human beings become non-human, that is a mandate for murder and there's a long historical parallel for that. Today, with Germany, the country that bombed this country (the UK) in our grandparent's lifetimes, so theoretically the grandchildren of Nazis can get in and out of England easier than the grandchildren of people from the Commonwealth who fought against the Nazis. Where do they come from? When we talk about immigrants, do we mean people from Australia and New Zealand? Didn't Boris Johnson go to Australia and say, "Hey, we're culturally the same!", was he talking about the Aborigines when he said that? "We call them expats". Right, why people have such a different way of classifying that white immigrants are expats and non-white immigrants are immigrants. So when we say immigrants, if we go to a border control, we can go there, Yarl's Wood, and we look at who is there, it's not a bunch of white people from New Zealand. So we have structural forms of privilege and bias that are much more insidious and much more difficult to overcome, and the reaction to Africans and Asians coming here post WW2, to rebuild the country after the Queen's German cousins bombed it, the reaction to them was one of general hatred. It's illogical! These people, who had formerly been colonized by Britain, had fought in both World Wars -- India gave 2.5 million volunteers for those who don't know -- talking about being "saved by America", when being saved by India and Russia, that would be a bit more accurate. But that's a bit inconvenient. The reaction to those people and their descendants has been one that is about structural bias and privilege. The greatest metaphor for this might be Canary Wharf and Tower Hamlets. If you look at that primarily Bengali community that has to look at Canary Wharf every day, how many people work in Canary Wharf other than cleaning toilets? "I want to get into that, through grain(?), wasn't a grain rate, because they're all rapping about E-14, what's that? Canary Wharf?" I suppose what I'm saying is, it's not about saying there is -- there's bias and bigotry everywhere in the world. The country my parents come from, it's pretty much generally accepted that they don't like gay people. But what's interesting, race even plays a role in that. In Jamaica, we have disgraceful homophobia. No one ever says it's because of Christian fundamentalism - even though it is justified and explicity Christian fundamentalist terms, because only Muslims do bad stuff because of their religion, because we know almost all the Muslims in the world are brown. Whereas a Germanwings pilot crashes and kills 150 people deliberately, or the man in Norway killed nearly 90 people, I was in Australia when that happened. There was this uniform agreement that white people will be portrayed differently. The Australian media referred to Anders Breivik having "terrorist-like tactics". I mean, to think about it. This guy killed almost 100 people, and he's just almost the terrorist. "And he'd written a crazy thing about Muslims". I mean he was a terrorist, by my understanding, but the idea that White is Right isn't just a European idea, it's an idea that has insidious implications because no matter what, the 700 people that were left to drown off the coast of the Mediterranean, were they white human beings, they wouldn't have been left to drown, and they certainly wouldn't be called cockroaches.
Probably the greatest mind since 2pac he should run for office and change the world I'd vote for him or even work for him the bloke is just real nuf respect
The same principles applies to the attitude towards migrants we take in from geo politics and wars. For example, when the war in Ukraine began, Britain accepted Ukrainian immigrants. Most British people had empathy for them and welcomed them. When china took Hong Kong, or recent attacks on gaza, the narrative is " ah it's sad but we can't take them in. Our country is over run". And this is from people who aren't directly racist. Racism lies in the subconscious before it reaches the surface.
I agree with him but I’m sick of having to take responsibility for our ancestors actions. A lot of countries from other continents tried to invade each other
Because the show is a comedy show, called new world order. Where a group of comedians talk about current affairs in a light hearted way. Obviously what Akala said was more serious but it's on a comedy show.... and he also made jokes
When he mentioned Britain "invading almost every country on the planet." I think a lot of people thought he was joking because they don't know British history. Because British education very rarely advertises its greatest failings. So they thought it was a joke and laughed.
@@danielmaxwell-perry1386 I'm sorry but whether it is taught or not, everyone in Britain knows that Britain tried to invade most of the world. The audience thought the comment was more tongue in cheek, hense why they laughed. Don't try and look for something sinister in this.
@@68iansutton I'm not looking for anything sinister, I'm just stating facts. Growing up in school the only time the words "British empire was used was as a point of reference. I never learned about the partition of India, the starvation or even operation legacy that exposed all the empires crimes. Maybe they were laughing because of tongue in cheek but that's just my opinion.
they dont like it when we speak the truth ... they sit in the back...just watch and dont clap ....coz they know what we're saying is right ...but rather wou'd justify all the wrongs thier forefathers did to the world ...
Correct me if im wrong, but I read that the use of the words terrorist and terrorism is used to describe a certain kind of attack? Killing somebody in the name of something (ie a religion) is terrorism but killing somebody because you don't like black people, or muslims is called something else, that's why some attacks are labeled as terrorism and others aren't?
Killing somebody in the name of something examples, religion, political ideology etc is terrorism but killing somebody because of skin color, race, ethnicity etc is called hate crime
@@camelrodriguez715 Well he did not formally defined it but used examples to illustrate, and those examples are only valid if you happen to have the same ideology with him, here's how I see it: Great Britain was great because it was the extension of the original French Britain, and it was used first as a term by King James the 1st to refer to the united lands of England, Scotland and Ireland. Yes he started the Irish Colonization but "civilize the savages" was not really a thing until the late 19th century, which is why the White Man's burden was published in 1899. That's an anachronistic analysis shaped by today's political landscape. And even if it was to stress the fact that it was a conquering empire, that's still doesn't make it about race, the only reason why France, England, Germany and Russia went overseas is because they ran out of white people to enslave
@@camelrodriguez715 That whole wall of text wasn't even just to say I'm obviously right and he's wrong, it's to say that the links he makes with race and their importance is at the very least, debatable
Lots of love for Akala in these comments, I thought almost everything he said was a load of rubbish. I mean who was pushing back on his speech here, the massive informed minds of Frankie Boyle and Katherine Ryan. They should have had someone on that was informed on these subjects to debate him.
another thing i notice they do, when they say "i'm going abroad" it's to some flyass european place or something.. "overseas"? oh yea, uh...m.. _Asia_ .
Akala a pan-Afrikan thinker with onley two startingspoints 1 white supremacy or the whites are racist and oppressors 2 Negritude or white and non-white are different even on cognitief level . It leads to victimhood, segregation, violence pseudo-science and revers racism or anti-racial racialism. Akala speaks so fast the onley point he is making is ;whites don't care for non-whites. His last example was why weren't the refugee's not saved by whites ? The real question is why didn't non-whites the dominant group is this region didn't care about their brothers and sisters and the esential question why are almost all refugees non-whites and migrating to white europe ? The refugees at that time were more than 50% trans-sahara migrants not from a warzone.
@@barta9342 face palm..yes they can, but it dosent mean somene cant spend time doing business with them and building projects with them lol rather than villiyfying another nation lol too sentimemtal there mate, love Africa pray they improve their situation
@@barta9342 i dont think you get my point and trying to appeal to sentiment rather than understanding how economy works lol so let me explain,, the economy.. relies on manny internal factors aswell as traders and exporters people creating foreign markets links, innovations etc, help a country thrive... thats how economy works.. yes they can do it themsleves, lol and yet men who invested have houses lol you see or not, the point is akala dosent make a point here rather, he should be wherever he wants helping others and building, rather villlyfyin others
Well Not Suprised Given that "Jamaica" was Colonalized by White British Christian Fundamentalist and Indoctrinated with there "Biblical Beliefs on "Homosexuality,. As a Akala stated The Label "Terroist" doesn't only apply to "Muslims" but "Christians" aswell. Perhaps you should listen to understand and Not Respond.😂
@@magiciansalchemist3693 homophobia existed in Jamaica before it was colonised. And even if it didn't, you're basically saying Jamaicans can't think for themselves.
This video makes even more sense now as we see the different treatment of Ukrainian refugees vs refugees from North Africa & Middle East.
so white countries just have to take all the refugees from all around the world... because???
@@yungmentalproblems because they're the ones interfering in other countries and creating instability which causes mass migrations. Take Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan for example, they all have western intervention as common factor, therefore, western countries should accept the consequences too.
It’s always made sense u just haven’t seen it clearly
Refugees vs economic migrants you mean
The powers that be have to maintain power. Refugees change the structure of the nation. Ukrainian people will maintain it. I think if u look at the laws of migration that changed after the Indian subcontinent joined the commonwealth. Britain immediately changed immigration std. Australia, New Zealand South Africa whites were fine. They were ex pats. Indians they were immigrants
It's one thing to have knowledge, but quite another to know how to convey it. This dude is one of the greatest minds alive today.
@@Charisma86 nervous?
So it's white guy's fault the blacks in Jamaica want gays dead. Akala is nothing but a virtue signaling ass-wipe.
@@michaelmcgee335 Yes. The same thing is happening in africa (ANTI-lgbt laws are being passed all over africa right now). one is about to be passed in my country (Ghana). This stems from christianity and homophobic laws being imposed on africans by europeans during the colonial era as well as (in recent years) far-right christian evangelicals from the U.S. going to african countries (and romania,hungary, and others) and pushing for anti-lgbt laws. basically trying to export homophobia/transphobia to vulnerable countries since they know it no longer flies in the west. Many african tribes have a well-documented history of sexual and gender fluidity pre colonial era. But this history has been eroded/being ignored due to brainwashing of africans with homophobia. Now african leaders are claiming that being LGBT is a white/western thing that the west is trying to force on africans (which is ironic). African leaders also claim christianity as being african while demonizing traditional african religions. Many of the problems we are seeing today stem from white supremacy/colonialism/racism.
@@veganengineer2019 So you're telling me these nations have no autonomy what's so ever?
@@veganengineer2019 So you think blacks are so pathetic they can't help but be homophobic because white-man told them to?
Wholeheartedly pay attention to when Akala speaks and notice the captivation grasped in the room - you realise what a generational polymath this man is - for the crowd to applaud everytime this man speaks. Truly grateful to witness.
Facts brother
He talks absolute shite to anyone with a brain.... so Germans were all Nazis now pmsl
He blames the white guy for everything. Very popular narrative. Uganda hates gays white man’s fault Jamaica hates gays white man’s fault. This guy infantilises black people more than anyone I know he won’t even allow blacks to have their own hatred’s or bigotry’s only white man can have those.
Amen to that.
As the descendent of the indians who faught in WW2, this rings very much true. Also much love to Akala, would love to have a conversation with him some day xx
Xx
Akala is impeccable. What a blessing to hear him speak!
Absolute pleasure replaying this video…
🔥just to hear akala spit fire truth🔥🫶🏽
When he talks you just want to listen. Thank you Akala for your immense wisdom.
I've known about Akala for years just chose not give him an ear damn what a fool i've been this man has knowledge
stilla gooner he does he’s very intelligent and eloquent
why woud you give ur ear to someone who supports terror?
@@DarthVader-xz2ni explain how he supports terror.
@@Emrys- He supported all the terror and violence last year
@@DarthVader-xz2ni I know I am late to this conversation, but you mentioned he supported terror last year. How so? I was unaware of him until a few months ago. I also must ask, what people have been reigning terror on countries and continents for centuries? I haven’t even finished watching this video, but i/we ALL know who he is referring too. What say you about Britain reigning terror and colonizing/occupying other peoples land? Really just curious.
I love this guy... Absolutely spot-on. . Articulate & intelligent.
Not on everything.
With the current war in Ukraine and how refugees are treated, that last part is even more true.
They will hear n still not understand what he is truly diving into...thank you Akala. You words go further than u.. Divine blessings always.
Akela's famous clip that stays in the curious minds of Western people for decades to come.
This guy needs his own podcast..
Although I don’t think a man of his intelligence would devalue his purpose to social media foolery..
Although I generally agree with him, Great Britain was called that to distinguish it from "Little Britain", Britanny. (Excuse spelling).
sssshhhhhh......just listen to the General....AKALA knowledge thats all you need brother.RESPECT!!!!!
I don't know if anybody else is just now getting to this. This is my first time hearing and seeing this. I have trouble understanding what someone is saying when they speak and need to read along to truly understand the weight of their words when they speak of something as serious as human rights and systemic racism. If anyone out there is like me in that regard, I have written out a rough transcript of what was said.
I think that, when we talk about race, we tend to focus on individual acts of prejudice. Which is why UKIP often comes up, because they
overtly say stuff that we find offensive. Unfortunately, the issue of race, if we understand it, is a lot more insidious and it takes a
lot more of a historical view to understand the difference between individual bias, and structural racism and privilege. The idea of
Great Britain was intimately tied to the fact that Britain's invaded almost every country on the Earth, literally. Literally, there is a
map; you can Google it. The idea of our greatness was intimately tied to this idea of empire, which was initimately tied to what Roger
Kipling calls the "white man's burden": to go and "civilize" all these stupid brown folks who have been writing and having civilizations
for thousands of years. But let's forget all of that. If we fast forward to today, when we talk about structural racism in Britain, do
we have the same instutional disparities in rates of imprisonment that they have in America? Yes, absolutely we do. Do we have the same
disparities in terms of who's dying to police custody? Yes indeed we do.
In 2011, we were told we love Libyans so much, we wanted to bomb democracy into them. Less than five years later, we're leaving people
fleeing the same conflict to drown in the sea, while giving a woman space in the national newspaper to refer to them as "cockroaches".
When you refer to humans as cockroaches, that is a mandate for murder. Let's be clear about that. The moment human beings become non-human,
that is a mandate for murder and there's a long historical parallel for that. Today, with Germany, the country that bombed this country
(the UK) in our grandparent's lifetimes, so theoretically the grandchildren of Nazis can get in and out of England easier than the grandchildren
of people from the Commonwealth who fought against the Nazis. Where do they come from?
When we talk about immigrants, do we mean people from Australia and New Zealand? Didn't Boris Johnson go to Australia and say, "Hey, we're
culturally the same!", was he talking about the Aborigines when he said that? "We call them expats". Right, why people have such a different
way of classifying that white immigrants are expats and non-white immigrants are immigrants. So when we say immigrants, if we go to a border
control, we can go there, Yarl's Wood, and we look at who is there, it's not a bunch of white people from New Zealand. So we have structural
forms of privilege and bias that are much more insidious and much more difficult to overcome, and the reaction to Africans and Asians coming
here post WW2, to rebuild the country after the Queen's German cousins bombed it, the reaction to them was one of general hatred. It's
illogical! These people, who had formerly been colonized by Britain, had fought in both World Wars -- India gave 2.5 million volunteers for
those who don't know -- talking about being "saved by America", when being saved by India and Russia, that would be a bit more accurate.
But that's a bit inconvenient. The reaction to those people and their descendants has been one that is about structural bias and privilege.
The greatest metaphor for this might be Canary Wharf and Tower Hamlets. If you look at that primarily Bengali community that has to look at
Canary Wharf every day, how many people work in Canary Wharf other than cleaning toilets? "I want to get into that, through grain(?), wasn't
a grain rate, because they're all rapping about E-14, what's that? Canary Wharf?"
I suppose what I'm saying is, it's not about saying there is -- there's bias and bigotry everywhere in the world. The country my parents
come from, it's pretty much generally accepted that they don't like gay people. But what's interesting, race even plays a role in that.
In Jamaica, we have disgraceful homophobia. No one ever says it's because of Christian fundamentalism - even though it is justified and
explicity Christian fundamentalist terms, because only Muslims do bad stuff because of their religion, because we know almost all the Muslims
in the world are brown. Whereas a Germanwings pilot crashes and kills 150 people deliberately, or the man in Norway killed nearly 90 people,
I was in Australia when that happened. There was this uniform agreement that white people will be portrayed differently. The Australian media
referred to Anders Breivik having "terrorist-like tactics". I mean, to think about it. This guy killed almost 100 people, and he's just
almost the terrorist. "And he'd written a crazy thing about Muslims". I mean he was a terrorist, by my understanding, but the idea that White
is Right isn't just a European idea, it's an idea that has insidious implications because no matter what, the 700 people that were left to
drown off the coast of the Mediterranean, were they white human beings, they wouldn't have been left to drown, and they certainly wouldn't
be called cockroaches.
What James Baldwin called Moral Monsters.
Clever individual. If we had his mind in politics today. Like him
Here’s an interesting lecture by Akala
:
The History of Black History - Akala @ Oxford
ruclips.net/video/Ze4IS5G_YYU/видео.html
this man is great
Probably the greatest mind since 2pac he should run for office and change the world I'd vote for him or even work for him the bloke is just real nuf respect
this is the literal definition of sheeeiiiiiiiiittttt
Lowkey
Really spot on.
There's a video here on RUclips: Every Country England Has Invaded: Visualized
Akala articulates himself really well! I would love to see this guy on more main stream media
This is perfectly balanced with a great big chip on each shoulder !!
Akala articulates well, you need but read into his talking points and he inadvertently disarms himself.
Too much truth to handle.
Reinvent the word racism and call yourself the good guy that's how you do it. Onya Akala.
Where can i watch the full thing?
The same principles applies to the attitude towards migrants we take in from geo politics and wars. For example, when the war in Ukraine began, Britain accepted Ukrainian immigrants. Most British people had empathy for them and welcomed them. When china took Hong Kong, or recent attacks on gaza, the narrative is " ah it's sad but we can't take them in. Our country is over run". And this is from people who aren't directly racist. Racism lies in the subconscious before it reaches the surface.
Nice one professor
Teachings non humans how to be
Humans ,..the reflection will be rejected
after the show is over. ...???
National Treasure
This guy speaks truth with such conciseness and clarity. His wording is careful and impactful. He should think about a rap career or something.
TRUTH ✊🏼
I agree with him but I’m sick of having to take responsibility for our ancestors actions. A lot of countries from other continents tried to invade each other
How he got angelina ?
🔥
lol absolutely over their heads
I’m find out this guy like a few days ago 😕
Akala for PM
A perfect explanation to Race relations in Great Britain today.
informative
Yo why are the audience laughing?
Because the show is a comedy show, called new world order. Where a group of comedians talk about current affairs in a light hearted way. Obviously what Akala said was more serious but it's on a comedy show.... and he also made jokes
When he mentioned Britain "invading almost every country on the planet." I think a lot of people thought he was joking because they don't know British history. Because British education very rarely advertises its greatest failings. So they thought it was a joke and laughed.
Guilt
@@danielmaxwell-perry1386 I'm sorry but whether it is taught or not, everyone in Britain knows that Britain tried to invade most of the world. The audience thought the comment was more tongue in cheek, hense why they laughed. Don't try and look for something sinister in this.
@@68iansutton I'm not looking for anything sinister, I'm just stating facts. Growing up in school the only time the words "British empire was used was as a point of reference. I never learned about the partition of India, the starvation or even operation legacy that exposed all the empires crimes. Maybe they were laughing because of tongue in cheek but that's just my opinion.
It's one thing to be schooled on your exceptionism, it's another thing to understand.
they dont like it when we speak the truth ... they sit in the back...just watch and dont clap ....coz they know what we're saying is right ...but rather wou'd justify all the wrongs thier forefathers did to the world ...
Correct me if im wrong, but I read that the use of the words terrorist and terrorism is used to describe a certain kind of attack? Killing somebody in the name of something (ie a religion) is terrorism but killing somebody because you don't like black people, or muslims is called something else, that's why some attacks are labeled as terrorism and others aren't?
Killing somebody in the name of something examples, religion, political ideology etc is terrorism but killing somebody because of skin color, race, ethnicity etc is called hate crime
terrorism just means violence with a political goal behind it... .Acting like racist killing isn't a form of political violence is pretty silly
Love the UK and its people ❤🇬🇧
Wao
After the Ukrainian refuge crisis this hits hard people are people no matter the color or religion
he didn't say anything about defining structural racism...
Yes he does. Listen to what he says about language for example.
no offence intended at all, but i feel it went over your head
Nah he didn't did he, pretty sure he was talking bout Pokemon the whole time ay
@@camelrodriguez715 Well he did not formally defined it but used examples to illustrate, and those examples are only valid if you happen to have the same ideology with him, here's how I see it:
Great Britain was great because it was the extension of the original French Britain, and it was used first as a term by King James the 1st to refer to the united lands of England, Scotland and Ireland. Yes he started the Irish Colonization but "civilize the savages" was not really a thing until the late 19th century, which is why the White Man's burden was published in 1899. That's an anachronistic analysis shaped by today's political landscape.
And even if it was to stress the fact that it was a conquering empire, that's still doesn't make it about race, the only reason why France, England, Germany and Russia went overseas is because they ran out of white people to enslave
@@camelrodriguez715 That whole wall of text wasn't even just to say I'm obviously right and he's wrong, it's to say that the links he makes with race and their importance is at the very least, debatable
he smart. but i would like to debate him for the fun of it on some areas, particularly the myth of 'homophobia'
Lots of love for Akala in these comments, I thought almost everything he said was a load of rubbish. I mean who was pushing back on his speech here, the massive informed minds of Frankie Boyle and Katherine Ryan. They should have had someone on that was informed on these subjects to debate him.
Shut up you racist nonce
another thing i notice they do, when they say "i'm going abroad" it's to some flyass european place or something.. "overseas"? oh yea, uh...m.. _Asia_ .
Nah they say that about going to the US too, over seas innit
bruv you are having a bubble!
Uks biggest race baiter, no question
I dont even know where to start with this nonsense. Mr Chip On Shoulder.
He's the uninformed's psuedointellectual.
I want to marry him 😍😭
6 years later.... look at the treatment of white refugees from Ukraine......
Akala a pan-Afrikan thinker with onley two startingspoints 1 white supremacy or the whites are racist and oppressors 2 Negritude or white and non-white are different even on cognitief level . It leads to victimhood, segregation, violence pseudo-science and revers racism or anti-racial racialism.
Akala speaks so fast the onley point he is making is ;whites don't care for non-whites. His last example was why weren't the refugee's not saved by whites ?
The real question is why didn't non-whites the dominant group is this region didn't care about their brothers and sisters and the esential question why are almost all refugees non-whites and migrating to white europe ? The refugees at that time were more than 50% trans-sahara migrants not from a warzone.
yep exactly that imagine if he actually tried helping africas problems...hold on..he asking us to get our wallets out
@@georgewilson3110 Don't underestimate the "Africans" they are able to help themselves ,aren't they ?
@@barta9342 face palm..yes they can, but it dosent mean somene cant spend time doing business with them and building projects with them lol rather than villiyfying another nation lol too sentimemtal there mate, love Africa pray they improve their situation
@@georgewilson3110 They can and will .It's their continent and responsibility , isn't it?
@@barta9342 i dont think you get my point and trying to appeal to sentiment rather than understanding how economy works lol so let me explain,, the economy.. relies on manny internal factors aswell as traders and exporters people creating foreign markets links, innovations etc, help a country thrive... thats how economy works.. yes they can do it themsleves, lol and yet men who invested have houses lol you see or not, the point is akala dosent make a point here rather, he should be wherever he wants helping others and building, rather villlyfyin others
Is he trying to blame white people for his homophobic grandparents? 😂
Well Not Suprised Given that "Jamaica" was Colonalized by White British Christian Fundamentalist and Indoctrinated with there "Biblical Beliefs on "Homosexuality,. As a Akala stated The Label "Terroist" doesn't only apply to "Muslims" but "Christians" aswell. Perhaps you should listen to understand and Not Respond.😂
@@magiciansalchemist3693with your logic we can blame black people for allowing themselves to become enslaved.
@@magiciansalchemist3693 homophobia existed in Jamaica before it was colonised. And even if it didn't, you're basically saying Jamaicans can't think for themselves.
@@magiciansalchemist3693 So you think black Jamaicans are so pathetic they can't help but hate gays because white guy's told them to?
@@everyman1 Are you aware of the term brainwashing?
not nearly as clever as he thinks he is
i never liked the smug cunt some of what he says is sound the main thrust is bollocks
Oh my god you're all brainlets 😂.
Still relevant today