Do You Really Understand Guns? | Colion Noir | GUNS | Rubin Report
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 авг 2018
- Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report talks to Colion Noir (attorney, gun rights activist) to discuss his work with guns and defending the 2nd amendment, everything he feels people should know about guns, the most common misconceptions surrounding gun laws, gun control and more.
Link to the study mentioned by Colion: news.northeastern.edu/2018/02...
Looking for more than pundits screaming talking points about US gun laws? Do you want to hear more nuanced arguments about the second amendment or gun control? America’s gun laws are a serious topic deserving intelligent conversation. Why did the founders write the 2nd amendment and what are the effects of it on modern day America?
Check out our playlist on America’s relationship with guns here:
• GUNS | Rubin Report
To make sure you never miss a single Rubin Report video, click here to subscribe:
/ @rubinreport
Looking for smart and honest conversations about current events, political news and the culture war? Want to increase your critical thinking by listening to different perspectives on a variety of topics? If so, then you’re in the right place because on The Rubin Report Dave Rubin engages the ideas of some of society's most interesting thought leaders, authors, politicians and comedians. The Rubin Report is the largest talk show about free speech and big ideas on RUclips.
Dave allows his guests to speak their minds and his audience to think for themselves.
New videos every week.
The Rubin Report is fan funded through monthly and one-time donations: www.rubinreport.com/support
******
Dave Rubin's book, "Don't Burn This Book" is now available for pre-order: www.dontburnthisbook.com
LISTEN to The Rubin Report podcast: www.rubinreport.com/podcast
See Dave LIVE: daverubin.com/events/
Sign up for our newsletter with the best of The Rubin Report delivered to your inbox once a month: www.rubinreport.com/newsletter
Official Rubin Report Merchandise: rubinreport.com/shop
All art on the set are original works by Caylin Rose Janet.
Get a print here: www.caylinrosejanet.com/rubin...
******
Colion Noir
Gun Rights Activist
Colion on Twitter: / mrcolionnoir
******
Follow Dave on Twitter: / rubinreport
Follow The Rubin Report on Facebook: / rubinreport
Follow Dave on Facebook: / daverubin
About Dave Rubin: daverubin.com/
"When it comes to defending my life I don't want it to be a fair fight."
And in that moment I became a huge fan of Colion Noir.
I literally looked up his channel and subscribed to give him my support after listening to him speaking his mind. May change my mind after I watch more of his videos but I feel he is incredibly honest and level-headed.
"If you find yourself in a fair fight, someone made a mistake."
Who wins a knife fight? The first guy who has a buddy to show up with a gun
@@josephs.1916 lol realistically it would be the guy who isn't mortally wounded or bleeds out first.
@@abc4781 well.... no sh!t.
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take away everything that you have."
Well Spoken 💯😎🍻
Sigkim 😂😂
Chrisfragger1 people in the country like me can and will prevent that . We blend in very well with the population
Chrisfragger1 nice.... exactly. Thank you.
@Sigkim Source? I can't find that quote. Was that just a joke? If it was inferred, use [brackets]. That is what they are for.
Hollywood celebs: “No one should have a gun”
Protected by armed bodyguards.
the gun grabbers including Bloomberg and the gun grabbers should be allowed no more protection than they would allow poor people--if they would disarm someone working swing or grave in a bad neighborhood, they do not deserve guards
Is that a catch 22 though? The UK has actors and actresses whom are protected by non-armed body guards. The guards there don't need guns because guns are exceedingly rare.
@@MathTutorVideos How many bodyguards do they have, can they afford? How much do those bodyguards cost? How many bodyguards are assigned to each individual or family in the UK? How many bodyguards can each UK family afford? On another note, how many actors live in walled in communities guarded by ARMED personnel? How many folks in the UK or the US can afford to live in such places?
In the United states the Police are ONLY responsible for the safety of the public at large. YOU are RESPONSIBLE for YOUR personal SAFETY over here, and has been ruled so by our Supreme Court. If arms are forbidden to the people, how many officers will be needed to be assigned to say, just each family to protect them from a 6'3", 285lbs man with a ballbat? Or two such folks armed with 2"x4"x1" bricks!?! Or, how 'bout a $15.99 MACHETE from Walmart? How bout if they have a couple damn shovels from the Home Depot?!
There is only ONE tool that can even the playing field in your favor. Otherwise, you are the mess the Police are writing a report about and zipping up in a body-bag.
They forgot the * "No one except us, we're important"!
Also Hollywood celebs: "I believe in open borders."
Live in homes and communities with walls and gates.
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson
Well quoted sir. Here is another that I have always liked. "He who would trade freedom for security deserves neither." Ben Franklin.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." Thomas Paine
actually people who unconditionally against 2nd amendment would not probably like Thomas Jefferson either lol
That's why he owned slaves? Before my head is bit off. As a black male liberal Republican I find so much hypocrisy in that statement. A man that owned slaves.
Shoutout to Colion's mom for raising a responsible man.
He's a lawyer! I never knew that. I have been watching his videos for years and been quite admirably impressed and now I know why; he's well educated. Education helps solve a lot [but not all] of life's issues. It certainly helps Colion Noir convey his message to his audience.
Praise God!!
My guess is there was a father involved in this man's upbringing
Messeresser I didn’t know he was a lawyer. Explains a lot.
My Father said " you want to be a man, a man takes responsibility for what you do, and don't do. That is what a man does."
He was a single parent to five children in 1966, a WWII MARINE COMBAT VETERAN who worked two and three jobs to support us. And raising a independent, responsible child take alot of work, double if a single parent.
God Bless and keep Colin's Mom.
Our Texas Governor said it best - "The Gun Control debate ended in 1792."
December 15, 1791: but you are CORRECT--> That is the only law needed.
Everything else is an infringement on our God-given, protected & inalienable rights .
Greg Abbott is this country's best governor, bar none.
I see a bumper sticker/"T" shirt coming.
too bad our TX Gov and LT Gov are caving now on gun control, ugh!
@@gnesteck3276 gib belft fed SBRs with giggleswitches from vending machines
Spooky how it's a former Texas Senator - Beto O'Rourke - calling for the mandatory government buyback of AR-15 and AK-47 rifles.
This dude is an American Patriot.
True American Hero
Wait, I thought Patriots were active duty?
(Inserts sarcasm)
"Why do you carry a gun?" Because a policeman is too big to fit in my pocket.
But seriously. Last year I had to call 911 because there were some juveniles outside my business brandishing a handgun on a Saturday afternoon. It took law enforcement *47 minutes* to arrive.
Please define “brandishing”. Depending on the state, the age allowed by law to handle or own a firearm vary. So simply stating juveniles have a handgun is not unlawful. And you calling law enforcement just because they have a pistol is as bad as others not wanting you to have a firearm. I am all in favor of upholding the 2nd amendment. But making generic statements about people who have firearms is not beneficial for the discussion.
@@mob7599 He already said he's pro-gun, so let's give him the benefit of the doubt and assume "brandishing" means "waving about like a fool".
S. E. Z you know what assuming does, right? I don’t know the person so why assume anything? Just because you have a particular view doesn’t mean you know a lot about a topic.
@@mob7599 I knew someone was gonna sound off if I used that word. Okay, "conclude". I mean he used a specific legal term related to his field of interest, so I don't see a reason to interpret it as meaning some other random thing. Either allege that he's lying, or believe it, or neither, but it's not realistic to claim that he's just randomly using specific terminology and might have meant something else.
@@mob7599 assuming means you are making a judgement with no real evidence to back it up or knowledge. While presuming means you have more evidence or knowledge about the person, object etc. So since you do not know him you would be assuming. Unless of course I am woefully incorrect. (Would not surprise me I usually am wrong about most things.)
I am in tears watching Dave say he's pro-gun. As an immigrant whose country was ravaged by both socialism and fascism, this is just like a birthday gift. My dude gets it.
tehkoalainsurgency Awesome! Same here! Which country did you come from? My parents and I came from Romania. We got out of the country right before the revolution happened in '89. My dad spent 3 years in prison for "crimes against the state" (aka illegally consorted with western missionaries as a translator). Grandma spent time in prison for having a church meeting in her basement; great-grandma died in jail doing the same thing. Gotta say, glad to be in the US, but all this talk from the left and their embrace of socialism is scaring me.
David Pop I'm from Chile. I'm sorry about what happened to your family. The Left says it wants socialism, the truth is, I don't think they know what they want. They forgot the roots of this country. Without a starting point, how do they know where they're going? They're renouncing the principles that make this country great.
My family came from Romania as well and I'm glad they escaped before the communist revolution because we could've ended up like your family. Thank god for the USA.
no, I'm American that's why I thanked GOD for the USA instead of Canada.
@ Big Cock 4 You - Socialism, Fascism and Communism are leftist ideologies...despite what you have been told by leftist organizations like Wikipedia. And, no doubt, you likely know very little about the politics of Central and South America as demonstrated by your idiotic comment.
Colion is becoming our “we the people” voice, outstanding!!
I love that Colion mentions the lack of critical thinking and basic research skills that are epidemic within our current society and country. Very true. So very true.
Yes! So much YES!
Indeed and people who just read headlines. I've ended up kicking some people off my "friends" list recently because they kept spamming comments that made it clear that they weren't bothering to read anything I linked to or even watch the first 30 seconds of the video, they just see the headline and start whining. I've tried to be patient but enough is enough, even if some of them are family.
Whenever see sign saying “Gun free zone”, I equate it to “Shoot here”. Bad guys know there is no one there to stop them.
@Ryan i suppose that depends on the level of the robber.. if they have the skills and the spine to pull it off it could be more profitable of a run. that is if done without loss but such is always a gamble. but to your average slam n grabs? yeah they wont touch the place lol.
Big fan of Colion Noir. Thanks for hosting him.
Heyyy, look who it is.
Ayyy
Hmm no RUclips checkmark. Is it like the Twitter verified hate?
Lol
Ayyyyyyy Matt make sure to check out Rogan's Noir interview as well, it was guchi
Yes, mandatory buyback is confiscation. Support the 2nd!
The government is buying your weapons back with the money you gave them in taxes!! So you are basically giving them away...CONFISCATION!
I have never bought any firearm from the government. So how are they "buying them back"? The left uses that term, which subliminally suggests the government allowed us to have them, ie; granted us the 2A, sorry no they didn't.
This is the type of interview anti-gun people need to watch
Borussia Doormat that’s the problem. They don’t watch. Their minds are too closed to listen
*The Fourteenth Amendment: **_"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."_*
CountArtha are you getting Virginia vibes Rn? Cause I’m getting Virginia vibes
Being bused a lot. Like here in CA and Virginia
I live in VA. and I can tell you right now. The private citizenry will not comply with any further infringement on our rights.
CountArtha amazing amendment, at the very least all red flag laws should be thrown out because there is no due process
@@stoney1445 move out of them states. And when no one is there shit will change back. Ky welcomes you with open arms while bearing arms. Come on guys stand up and do something for what you believe in and fight for it
Muskets back then, were the scary military weapons of the 1700’s. So YES, the founding fathers meant military style weapons for civilians as well.
Knife_Man_Zack Hell someone asked Jefferson, because the guy owned a shipping business, if the 2nd applied to naval cannons. Jeffersons answer? YES IT DOES. So technically we should all be allowed to own 90+ millimeter cannons, but most gun owners are reasonable, real reasonable, and dont own one.
memnarch129 I was born in the former communist Russia and spent some of my teen years there. I remember the fear and the tyranny we experienced. We weren’t allowed to own anything and were fed the propaganda that the government wanted to feed us. No freedom of speech, religion, or the right to bear arms. My family fled to United States. As I started growing here and experiencing freedom, I quickly realized that this is by far the best place on earth. So when the ungrateful American snowflakes like Cuomo say that America is not great and never was, I want to slap them across the mouth and send them to a communist/socialist country so they can experience their version of greatness. 😂
memnarch129 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
The greatest piece of literature ever written.
After I typed my response I realized how it could sound Anti-Gun, it was actually meant to be PRO second amendment. What I meant is that following the law as intended we should all own our own navel weapons. But most look at it and go "You know that is a bit over the top so Ill not get one just so I dont looke like a wacko". Hope that clears things up.
A better justification for weapons is actually a anecdote about the West and the advancement of firearms. Yes people are endowed with certain rights, but some are stronger than others and could bully them around. The quote is about the introduction of the Colt Single Action army, aka the wild west 6 shooter,. The quote goes "God made men, Samuel Colt made them equal"
I really wish that Colion would run for office. I'd vote for him in a heartbeat.
"Why do you need to own a gun?" Because it's an inherent right and rights aren't determined by necessity.
I disagree. I don't think gun ownership is an inherent right, but I think it is the tool the government currently allows to protect your actual inherent rights of Life, Liberty and the Persuit of Happiness. Government is supposed to exist to protect those actual inherent rights. However government used to recognize that it is incapable in any practical way of fulfilling its main purpose to exist of protecting those inherent rights, so government through the 2nd says government cannot always protect you and yours, but you can and government recognizes and protects that ability for you personally.
To simplify gun ownership is not necessarily a right because we didn't always have guns however it is the right of every human being living to protect themselves. Weather is with a gun a knife a stick a club a spear a sword, or even just your bare hands
@@stevelux9854 the second amendment says "right to bear arms". It does not state firearms. Arms can be any means by which a person can and will defend their liberty. That can be a gun, a sword, or laser blaster.
@@dangerrangerlstc Agreed, by whatever means necessary.
The necessity, like the right, is self evident.
I love this guy! Who is watching in Corona 2020 where gun ownership rights is becoming self evident?
Same here!
Even more so at the time I write this.
2021 WE STILL FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT!! GOD BLESS AND GOD BLESS AMERICA
Future here, wait until SCOTUS starts giving us rights back in 2022
The 2nd amendment was written with private ownership of 32-gun frigates in mind - the Continental Navy wouldn’t have existed otherwise.
We’ve moved from “citizens should be able to own unrivaled firepower capable of besieging a small country” to “citizens shouldn’t be allowed to carry handguns anywhere”.
So much for _shall not be infringed._
It also referred to privately owned cannons and mortars on private property. Which would be really cool to have, btw.
We've also moved from slavery to something better. Sometimes it's progress to change the law ;). Indeed, I suspect most Americans do think this "army" and "police" invention things have been pretty useful.
Europeans certainly think so, but we're a bit biased since America making these decisions has rather saved our butts several times. :)
FXIIBeaver let’s not forget about the slaughter in Rawanda in the 90’s which was perpetrated mostly with machetes and blunt objects. You don’t need guns to exterminate people but guns certainly helped to bring order to a nation hell bent on killing each other. If those poor people were armed do you really think they’d of been killed with knives? Ridiculous.
@dokithecat I've never heard this argument before. If true, I think that is an awesome defense against "muzzle loader" arguments. I spent some time searching for private ownership of cannons, mortars, and frigates and couldn't find anything. Do you have any sources for your statement?
Yeah and now the left wants all semi autos banned
Really enjoyed this video and found that I was educated on American gun control and the NRA. As I live in England and used to hearing the left wing viewpoint i thought there was a real problem in the US with guns. However thanks to this video and how well Colion put his and the NRA views forward I have now changed my mind and viewpoint.
Huge fan of the Rubin Report.
🤝🤝🤝🤙🙏🙏🙏
Welcome to the light, my friend
Having seen Vox videos on American gun violence I believed that owning a gun was something no sane person would want. Then I got a job that required commuting across London at 2am and everything made sense.
Neil Hulme so grateful you took time to understand. As an expat Brit I actually had to go through the gun classes with my 12 year old son before I respected the training and responsibility Americans go through to get a gun permit and own their guns.
Well there is a problem but the problem isn't necessarily a gun problem as much as it's a failed mental health system and the lack of enforcement of existing gun laws.
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty - Thomas Jefferson
The “AR” in “AR-15” rifle stands for ArmaLite rifle, after the company that developed it in the 1950s. “AR” does NOT stand for “assault rifle” or “automatic rifle.” AR-15-style rifles are NOT “assault weapons” or “assault rifles.” An assault rifle is fully automatic, a machine gun.
Nick Melnykov In addition, the original AR-15 was designed for civilian use. It was later modified for full auto use for the military and police but people forget the original intent.
An Assault weapon is any object, be it a club, rock, knife or firearm, used to attack or assault another person. It does not mean automatic or semi, bolt-action, or pump action. Notice the "action" on those? Fully automatic (machine gun) is an action of the firearm.
Kanseagle Ummm, not quite correct based on society's views. You are using "assault" as a verb when the term, when applied to firearms is used as a noun; or at most an adjective to describe a noun. If you are going to argue "assault" terms with regards to weapons you need to stick to the standards of modern nomenclature or you run the risk of clouding the waters for others who are still learning.
@@slypperyfox if you use a rock to assualt someone is it not an assualt rock at that point?
@@slypperyfox society's views don't matter, most of them are idiotic, by definition an assault rifle is not a thing until I assault someone with a rifle.
Colion Noir is a Man's Man and a Patriot's Patriot. God Bless the good work he does for Our Constitution and it's 2nd Amendment.
NO GUN FREE ZONES.
Schools should be guarded
75% of my male teachers in high school were ex military. A kid brought in a knife once and I watched one of these teachers drop the kid with a history book. I'd bet he would be a very good person to defend students with a gun
Gun free zone = free fire zone
Remember a police officer carries a gun for their defense, not yours.
do not forget that LEOs are not responsible for anyone's safety other than their own
@@davidcarson7855 Except when they indirectly protect people from Murderers and Thieves? Or am I just imagining those people being whisked away off the streets. Like a wizard zapped them away, never to be seen?
@@alreadyblack3341 "DeShaney vs. Winnebago and Town of Castle Rock vs. Gonzales, the supreme court has ruled that police agencies are not obligated to provide protection of citizens."
@@kilo6one .... Ah yes, Indirectly means performing the exact action specified. I forgot my understanding of the word, my bad.
kilo6one even more recent, in the civil suit against the Parkland shooting officer who hid in the stairwell, the court ruled he had no OBLIGATION to protect lives.
First time watching The Rubin Report but Impressed with how he seems like a guy genuinely interested in hearing his guest's viewpoints on an issue and be educated by that. Hats off to him for a respectful and interesting conversation.
I'm inclined to agree.
The best gun control is using two hands.
bench-rest actually.
=)
Fist grip with thumbs down instead of saucer grip ; )
Micah nah mayne yaw gots ta hode it sidewayz like us thugz n gangstaz
The only gun control. Not the best.. ;-)
Yeah I love dual wielding.
When seconds count cops are minutes away!
True, but the reason those seconds count that much, is that everyone has guns.
Not just that it makes it so much easier for criminals to obtain them.
Also that they can carry them rather easily (in a gun-free nation you don't want to put a big sign up asking cops to check you out :P).
And finally, to fire them. Because criminals are a lot more keen to do so, if they suspect you may pull out a gun any moment.
The idea you expressed, would predict that criminals would utterly run most of Europe. Well I suppose they do, but they don't use guns and we call them politicians so....;)
@@sorsocksfake they very much use guns in England to enforce their socialism.
sorsocksfake in a nation of 350 million guns the very idea of trying to enforce their removal from civilian hands is utter nonsense. the only people that would turn them in or be in a position to have them taken are the exact people that you would not have concerns for owning them.
in addition, even without a gun..... an 80 yo grandmother who lives alone has zero chance of protecting herself from multiple intruders in her home without a firearm.
disarm her and its game over for her.
how can anyone with the slightest inkling of empathy for such a person feel obliged to remove from her the only method by which she can reasonably protect herself. its absurd.
then the argument is ..... remove semi automatic weapons. you really expect her to work a bolt action rifle during such an event? rack a shotgun?
with a small caliber semi automatic pistol shes got a chance.... even if it only moderately improves the odds.... denying her that ability is unconscionable.
sorsocksfake a lot has to be said about the deterrent factor that civilian gun ownership has on crime such as burglary when the dwelling is occupied. In the UK about 30% of all burglaries take place when someone is at home versus in the United States where only 13-15% of burglaries take place when the home is occupied.
sorsocksfake, seconds count that much not just because of the existence of a firearm. people like myself have been trained and practiced in ending lives in rather short order. it doesnt take a firearm to end a life in a quick and efficient manner. cain and able managed it with the jaw bone of a donkey. in a real life and death struggle the "action" in most cases wont even take a minute. and in many cases the fatal blow(s) can be landed in seconds, while the act of dying can take significantly longer. hell its why most martial artist are taugh to run when weapons are involved because their instructors dont want their students getting overconfident and killed because they underestimated the lethality of a simple household object.
an officer whos a 2-3 minute phone call, and a 10 minute drive away.... you wouldnt even be able to finish unlocking the phone if your actually engaged in a situation where the other person is both prepared and willing to inflict harm on you. the last thing you want to be doing is trying to defend yourself with one hand while your heads turned away as you attempt to fish your phone out of a pocket, unlock the screen, or call for help. heck even if you somehow get the phone dialed and get the call conected youve still managed to hamstring yourself by taking one of your arms outa the equation.
Colion: People ask, "Why do I need to carry a gun, when the likelyhood that you'll ever need it is so low?"
Answer: The same reason I have an AED in my car. Same reason I have emergency rations, water, and medical supplies in my basement. Being prepared doesn't mean you're nuts. It means you thought ahead just in case.
You dont have to... that's your right.. just as carrying a gun and owning guns is my CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT... clear enough? You can put your faith in Law Enforcement to save you and those you care for... how did that work out in the Parkland shooting when the Officer HID OUTSIDE while kids were being massacred... me?? I take responsibility for my safety and that of my loved ones...
This isnt directed toward you... more to "people"... lol
So true, especially right now in the age of COVID-19 and government restricting rights arbitrarily through executive orders.
And the same reason I wear a face mask in public for covid-19 reasons. Or why people wear parachutes when they jump out of airplanes.
I'm usually rendered speechless by the sheer ignorance of people who tell me the AR-15 I personally selected and assembled the individual parts for down to every last pin and spring tell me my AR-15 is a "weapon of war," yet if you showed them an old man with a Kar 98, Lee Enfield, Mosin Nagant, or other similar bolt action rifle with wood furniture, they'd just call that a "hunting rifle."
My question to them is, "what makes my 100% civilian rifle a weapon of war while the actual weapons used to cause millions of deaths in both world wars is a "hunting rifle?"
It's important to ask them to define what makes one weapon "evil" and the other not. I've yet to ever hear a good answer, as it usually just highlights how little they know while somehow having very strong opinions on the matter. Not sure how one can legitimately have strong opinions about something one's completely ignorant about, other than by being brainwashed to have knee-jerk emotional reactions whenever a trigger of one's indoctrination is presented.
Also, what is wrong with owning a weapon of war?
@@keeganowens8949 Nothing is wrong with it. The government does not want you owning any weapons that can stop them. The constitution says we can, even fully automatic, which are not "assault rifles- AR" they're machine guns. Politicians, and finally the courts are the ones that have prohibited us.
When seconds matter, the police are minutes away
29:45 Every time there's a shooting, the first thing i ask is: "Was it a gun-free zone? Were the victims prohibited from having weapons there?"
That's true of virtually all mass shootings in my lifetime.
Not all but definitely the vast majority.
If they have a gun free zone their should be checkpoints in and out and their should be one armed security guard.
This was really informative. And I like that the interviewer allows the guest to talk, unlike other shows.
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it”
~ Aristotle
Colion got distracted by the question about auto vs semi-auto. He should have explained how hard and cost prohibitive it is to buy a fully automatic firearm. It appears that Rubin doesn't understand the difference between a semi-auto rifle and a fully auto rifle...hence the question "why does someone need one..."
I caught that too. I wish he would have mentioned the difficulty in legally owning a automatic weapon.
confiscate without conviction or even charge of a crime, is called ARMED ROBBERY AND TREASON of the 2nd, 4th and 5th.
James Barnes don’t forget the 14th
Colion Noir is one of the most well spoken men on the planet, its good to see him on a fair interview finally. Colion Noir voice of liberty
Here’s a thought, you can live just fine w/o having a Twitter account.
bought my first gun this week from a Pawn shop in Missouri. Had to fill out a background check but it was done within minutes because I am squeaky clean. I've been aching to take up my 2nd Amendment right and have a tool to defend my wife and I besides calling and waiting for police. I have no interest in hurting anyone but the best way to stop a crime being committed is to have a defensive weapon. We have alot of break-ins from addicts from the nearby treatment center.
Charlton Blake good for you brother.
Train train train. Get some instruction and make sure you're up to speed on local laws.
Good for you brother, if only we could have these fast and easy background checks at gun shows and private sales then the gun control advocates wouldn't have a leg to stand on
William Fleming They already don't have a leg to stand on, as background checks wouldn't have stopped any single one of our mass shooters. The Left is foolishly after the symptom, not the cause of violence. Look at Canada, part of which literally banned the sale of knives for a while, which is what was proposed recently in London. Don't give the Left an inch, because they will never stop.
Happy for you brother. True freedom is when you take full responsibility for yourself. Take the time to become proficient and knowledgeable.
A lot of fools think you can just go get an automatic weapon... if you could even afford one ($10,000 plus), you'd still wait months or years for paperwork, plus need local chief law enforcement officer sign off.
Yeah I wish he would have gone a little deeper into that. He glossed over it saying that people can get an automatic weapon but didn't mention the serious amount of stuff you have to go through to get it. Otherwise a great interview!
Not that that's a good thing.
@@CountArtha it isn't at all. We should be able to buy them like any 4473 firearm. Then we push to abolish background checks
Scott Graves maybe a hi point... if he could get it to work....
@@lrdeldric hey man hi points might be ugly as sin but they're reliable ass guns lol
I love how he allows the conversation to flow there’s not stepping in and no fighting
“I gotta raise a man”... love that woman. Since my son was very little, that thought always stayed on my mind. I used to always say, “I’m not trying to raise a big baby. I’m trying to raise a man”.
God created man and Sam Colt made them all potentially equal.
Amen
When seconds matter, Police are only mins away
The logic from the gun control crowd I hate the most is ʺmilitary‐style assault weaponsʺ, as if a wood stock is synonymous with hunting animals and a synthetic one used for hunting people.
Yep, those good ol' M1 Garands, great hunting rifles. They were dependable in hunting down the German Nazi.
@@vidoman362 i am still surprised there is not more hate on the 1911s..... been with us for many many ages as well.
I find Colion Noir to be one of the most introspective and interesting thought leaders in our society.
A human being with an open mind...it's a beautiful thing! Add great education: Colion Noir!
Brian @ Highimpactflix said it best:
Brian: "Do you believe in gun control?"
Advocate: "Absolutely!"
Brian: "So who should control the guns?"
Advocate: "The government"
Brian: "Do you trust politicians?"
Advocate: "Well no, not really"
Brian: "So you want people that you don't trust to control the guns? Isn't that why you're holding that sign, because you DON'T want that?"
@Highimpactflix
Ifixem Advocate: homina homina
Ifixem so true, particularly up here in canadastan
I wish Colion had been in Virginia supporting everyone there. His voice is cool, calm and collective.
Such a well spoken, intelligent and humble guy. His mother did a fabulous job raising this young man.
"You get a gun! You get a gun!"
- Gun Oprah
Ghetto Oprah
😂
🤣
That Mahr interview was ridiculous. Bill Mahr changed the subject and cut Colion Noir off every time Colion was getting to the point.
That’s why I love The Ruben report because he lets his guests speak and make their points. Bill Maher is a leftist hack.
literally all i heard was clapping
And Maher calls himself a "libertarian". As an actual libertarian, it makes me angry to see him calling himself that. Also, as an atheist, I absolutely despise his open disdain, or even hate, for Christians and other people who have beliefs. He is so far to the Left he can't see straight.
@@elqueso5524 He's not a libertarian, he's an asshole
"Why do you feel the need to carry a gun?" My response would be, "Do you wear seat belts and put your kids in car seats?"
I always say "Do you have insurance on your car? Your health? Life??? And you hope to never _have_ to use them, but they are there if you do need them, correct? My gun is personal life insurance. I hope to never have to even point a gun at someone, much less pull the trigger, but if I have to, I will be glad I was able."
@@vincedibona4687 I'd add having fire extinquishers in your house and car, jumper cables in your car, wearing seat belts, 1st aid kits, etc. etc.
I’ve said this to many people and then they finally get it. I put my seatbelt on and pray to God it is never put to use.
It's kinda like why do people need a car that can do over 150 mph
gantin strike I don’t think you understood...
I loved this conversation between Rubin and Colion. Great talk. Tons of great information.
As far as people being nervous about 3 guys walking into Chipotle with "big ass guns". That's only because they aren't used to it. In the 1950s 60s and even the 70s in some places, that would have been common place and nobody would bat an eye.
The left wing media has divided and changed the culture where 1/3 of the people think of guns as evil or gun owners as crazy. Another 1/3 are apathetic and don't care one way or another about guns, but most of them have never seen one in person and they are still nervous about them just like people with no experience are nervous around any other piece of machinery. The last 1/3 are gun owners, half of which are fine with seeing guns everywhere and the other half are so terrified of the left taking their guns away, that they won't do anything that might draw attention because it "just gives them ammunition to take our guns!"
So of course most people are nervous. If you don't want people to be nervous, you need to get them more used to seeing guns. Nobody is nervous about cars because we see them everywhere, even though more people die in car accidents than in shootings every year.
So true. Your comment made me think back to when i was much younger. There was a time in just about every state i suppose when there were rifle mounts in pickup trucks everywhere carrying guns especially during some hunting season. And most of the time most people just left them there. It was the norm and no one thought much of it. But nowadays if that was seen people in most places would freak out!!
@@russellmiller6023 true.. I'm not american.. but I remember movies in the 70s and 80s that had the pickups with guns in the rack. Was a common sight.
I never thought of it that way before. Thank you for sharing!
@Mr. Morningstar something I've always wondered is how felony convictions and gun ownership works in the more pro gun states. Does a felony conviction get purged after x yrs so u can own guns? Are u prohibited to own all guns? Even simple shotguns?
@Mr. Morningstar that feels like it would violate the 2nd amendment. If you have completed your sentence then you shouldn't continue to be punished. A felony who lives in a rural area, 50 miles to closest cop, would have no way to protect his life and property. This just feels so unamerican to me.
I mean.. the felons who want to do crimes with guns they just get an illegal gun. But if u did one stupid thing as a kid, maybe bcoz u had an addiction, could be total non violent crime, you would loose one of the most fundamental rights in America. This seems like a European way of thinking about guns.
In sweden ur criminal records gets purged after 10 years. But if u do 1 thing, like drive too fast, it adds 10 more years. I got convicted of felony drugs 15 yrs ago. Been ok since then, but I drove with a suspended license coz I had not got it renewed, this was 2015.. so 10 more years.
But there is a loophole, percussion guns made b4 1890 is not considered weapons in sweden. So I have a Remington 1858 army and a few old percussion shotguns and a st.etienne needlefire rifle as home defence. Works pretty well. U can have a remington revolver loaded 1 year and all.chambers will fire without problem. I guess u might have something similar in the us, I might even think that all percussion guns, regardless of manufacturer date does not need license. Or I might be wrong...
I am ok with gay couple protecting their weed farm with machineguns.
Haha. the mental image of a way-too-tan guy wearing nothing but a scarf, aviators and slippers pulling a scarface in the middle of his pot field.
@@jloren4647 *Lispy gay voice* "Say hello to my little friend!"
I've noticed an increase in the number of obviously gay clients at pistol ranges in Maine these days now that so many Muslims are emigrating here.
I think you are missing something here if you think that’s “cool”, my friend.
Increasing numbers of homosexuals; increasing number of Muslims.
Where’s the “cool”? Where do you think either of those two developments are leading?
C.S. Unger, maybe they are members of the Pink Pistols ...
Mr. Colin Noir for President of the USA! I'm VOTING for HIM!
A .30 cal M-1 has an enbloc clip that is top loaded and is ejected when empty.
An AR-15 is fed from a magazine that loads into the receiver from below.
Over 20,000 federal, state, & local gun laws, regulations & ordinances. I'd say it's fairly "well regulated".
@drealmerz7 z 100% agree
You don't need an hour for this.
I have the right to keep and bear arms, that I was born with.
The government can't do anything about it.
I do not connect mass shootings with widespread firearm ownership. But, I choose Liberty over Safety anyway.
But there are people on the fence that will hear this open, intelligent conversation and perhaps change their views. This is how things change, not just preaching to the choir.
@@chadfolzenlogel8739 What fence? They better not be on MY fence dammit.
You won't get any open intelligent conversation from anybody that wants gun control. They don't understand the most fundamental thing about arms. They don't understand the most fundamental reason we aren't giving them up.
You cannot put taxes, fees or restrictions on a right. It then becomes a privilege.
I can say that because I filled out the application for free speech, waited 30 days for the background check, paid my fee, forwarded a copy of my temporary speech license to DemSoc, paid my fee, got approval to pay for my application for a full license review.......
@@yourhandlehere1 You are wrong about the idea that these conversations cant change minds. If Colion was to take on a public debate on the national platform he would definitely change minds. Reps or Libs makes no difference because both sides are wrong about a lot of subjects. Having the open discussion will educate those that don't know the facts about any given subject. Libs aren't all stupid and Reps aren't all stupid.
IcantSignIn
You understand that the government you’re referring to created the framework and then made up the 2nd amendment that gives you that right, yes? And I have to assume you’re somehow intimately aware of the exact meaning of that amendment, despite its confusing structure and direct reference to a citizen comprised military (which we don’t have or need anymore)? Let us know if that’s the case, and as a side note I wish you had been on the Supreme Court for the Heller case if so.
That being said, Colion is great, and I appreciate his perspective. I do wish he’d talk about...
- the second amendment is federal but gun laws are decided state by state, which causes a serious issue in places like Chicago where guns can freely travel from IN to IL.
- gun show loopholes are a very serious and ongoing problem
- caliber/magazine/quantity/use are specifics that we should at least discuss
- if cars are a useful comparison for some people, why doesn’t everyone pass a shooting and safety test before being given a gun permit, as we do a driving test?
- lastly, disguising a gun violence issue as a mental health issue (ever) is disingenuous. We have both of those, not one or the other.
Thanks for keeping the conversation healthy and ongoing. Most people on either side of any debate are sane and reasonable, they’re just not normally the loudest. 👍
Noir has such a relaxing voice.
"If you are carrying a gun and there's an active shooter and you pull your weapon the police might shoot you by mistake in the confusion"
I am aware but I cannot standby while others are in danger. If I die I at least know that I did whatever I could.
if there’s cops let them do their job, chances are they are vastly more qualified than you.
@@ValorantRivals right but the point is what are you gonna do before they get there?
@@ValorantRivals the majority of firearms owners have more training and experience with their firearms than police do. Police have to pay out of their own pocket for additional firearms training. Id rather have Colion with me than a police officer. Police account for about 300,000 armed people in america with a 14% error rate. Armed civilians make up 80,000,000 and have a 2-3% error rate
Aq Xico right but if you read what he says, it’s that the cops are already there
Cameren Warmbo not to point out the obvious but you %s are way off, Police have to fire their guns while getting shot at, in high stress situations while the civilian surprises the criminal 99% of the time. The rate of error is guaranteed to be higher for a police officer so those %s mean absolutely nothing in future unpredictable situations. Even I can see that. Police have way more experience in high stress situations cause it’s their job.
Colon Noir is probably the best and most knowledgable person I know of to educate about firearms. Thanks
for making this important video!
Casper Brother take an NRA basic firearms class (pistol) or (rifle) then you can be educated as well.
Dave I hope you can spend some time going to the range. Talking about guns and shooting them are like night and day. You soon start to see that it's not at all like how it's portrayed in the media. Good interview overall though
This is probably the most accurate statement about the subject to date......
Seems like a ‘if you try heroin you’ll see it’s different to the public perception’ argument. Guns, like opium, in the wrong hands, are dangerous.
Basing it only on American murder/manslaughter/accidental death rates per capita.
Gareth Ellis those rates have been falling since the 90s dude. Our gun homicide rate is half of what it was since the highs of the 90s -- all while the number of guns in circulation has more than doubled. Now how can that possibly be if guns are the heroin that you're suggesting?
Hey, even a hammer is dangerous in the wrong hands. And that's the irony -- more people are killed with blunt objects like hammers than are with ARs in this country. Are hammers now heroin?
Apples and Oranges. Moron.
Fun fact- more teens die in car accidents than by a gun, nobody is banning cars....in fact they, the regressive progressives, want to LOWER the driving age AND voting age......hmm....wonder why....
AND remember the last time blacks werent allowed to own guns? Didnt work out so well for them....dont think I want to find out if all guns were gone.....
While watching... I was thinking “It’s a good thing there were no red flag laws when you were in law school...”
Colin is the Man! Keep fighting the good (and Constitutional) fight brotha!
If they say this (a musket) is what's protected by the 2nd A then ask them if only a hand pressed newspaper and un-amplified voice are protected by the 1st A.
aCycloneSteve they want to repeal the 1st A too.
The leaders do, but you will be talking to the rank and file who think they are supporting America.
I sympathize with your position but there is a logical fallacy at play here hand pressed papers and the modern media have far more in common than front loading ball muskets and the modern military style weapons that are available to the general public.
A musket could fire one round every minute out to a range of a few hundred yards, a modern battle rifle can fire 30 aimed shots per minute out to 600 yards.
A hand press could perhaps print 60 pages a minute for a few hours, modern printers print 50,000 full newspapers in a few hours & online versions can reach billions..
An un-amplified voice can speak to a few hundred people, a voice on radio or TV can reach millions or even billions.
I think the "change" in technology is GREATER for speech and press.
William Fleming aCycloneSteve look up the Puckle Gun. It was made in 1718, and was the "machine gun" of its time. They knew technology would advance, and didn't care. The people are the militia, and they wanted the militia to have "weapons of war". Also, the 2A isn't about hunting; it is the ultimate check against government tyranny.
The speed limit is 65mph so why do we "need" a car that can go over a 100mph?
LOL good point 😂😂😂👍
If we use their fictitious Logic No one should be able to goover 65 miles an hour in their car either
Great point!
And are they gonna ban cars too, look how many people have been killed, by being run down, or just killed in auto accidents
Except the rich! They still get those fast cars right???
" 1 Percent, ....if that one percent happens, ...it's 100 percent of Everything!."..........SUBSCRIBED!
I am from the UK so a lot of your guests i have no idea who they are. I clicked this expecting to half listen or turn it off after awhile . Loved it .
Guns are like drinking... The first shot you ever take pretty rough... But that second shot, hooked for life.
I'm British and I was hooked from the first time I fired a gun, I was also hooked on drink after my first ale XD
Kudos, Colion Noir! Excellent representation of the 2nd. You represented "Common sense", and we (Texas patriots) Thank You for that. Bravo Zulu.
I was asked recently, who would you like to spend two days with on a range.. My response was, Noir. 😎
Marvin funtime yup. But it’s a toss up between him and Matt from demo ranch
@@ryanwalker4554 oh come on hickok45 would be epic to lol
@@clintkees6158 true
I too prefer the "element of surprise." So am therefore inclined to carry concealed (vs open).
I prefer the deterrent, I open carry. Because when you see that I am armed, that is the only warning you get.
And I pray night and day, that I never have to take a life.
I carry because I value life, yours and mein.
I grew up with after school specials on gun accidents. I was successfully trained to fear guns. Thank goodness I leaned in the direction of freedom, and believe gun ownership is a right.
Colion its great to have you speaking up for our rights. You are an intelligent, articulate, respectful, highly relatable advocate. Its an honor to hear you speak. Thank you and keep up the great work! Your mom must be very proud, she raised an outstanding son.
Thanks to Dave Rubin for having a great, productive, and open minded discussion!! Kudos to you sir!! Thanks also to Colion for being cool-headed, calm, and factual!
Cool-headed? Not the daily inundating of the media "stereotypes".
Gun Rights = 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of The United States of America....... end of discussion!!!!!!
Gotta love how someone who comments on a video focused on trying to open up discussions and free speech immediately claims there is nothing to discuss.
No Google, I don't want to use my real name. They also don't enjoy the freedom we do. " He who would exchange freedom for a little security will soon have neither freedom or security."
Been Franklin
"No Google, I don't want to use my real name" Your obviously a TROLL since your screen name denotes a piece of news on internet identity attached to google that is about 12 hours old...
Which countries are you speaking of?!!! LIke Israel where teachers are armed with paramilitary firearms?
Out of 3 (THREE) commentors "Wayne Martin" is the first R-E-A-L person, nothing but TROLLS before his comment folks, move along now......
Man, you can speak about Constitutional Rights & the TROLLS come out of the shadows QUICK!!!!!
No Google, I don't want to use my real name. Really? You Apperantly didn't watch the video .
The right to keep and bear Arms empowers the people and limits the government.
Anyone against the 2nd is not thinking clearly.
You should check out The Gun Collective on RUclips, if you already don't watch it. Adam Kraut does great work on that channel and he'll hopefully join the board of directors in the NRA.
You should go fight the government then with your stash of guns and see how that works out for you
Rex, people keep saying that, but you can get a lot done as an insurgent with a rifle. Just look the US's current war that we can't win. Or talk to any single combat vet.
Rex, that depends on the circumstances. The one that matters most - a tyrannical government - would be a lot less straightforward than you seem to think.
Mainly because the army would probably not be too eager to go around shooting civilians, let alone their brothers and sons. Let alone drive a tank over them or bomb them to bits. As long as the govt doesn't mind-control the army, its means will be limited.
Indeed, in such a situation, the army's loyalty would be very questionable. At which point a few million people - many combat trained - with semi-automatic rifles become pretty scary.
Finally, look around at some of the wars the US has been fighting and realize that relatively lightly armed people can cause a lot of trouble to a very powerful army even when it has no such weakness.
=======
That said, one may legitimately question how much this has actually been a benefit for the past 100 years, and whether that's worth the rather more obvious price in lives.
sorsocksfake. Or, maybe we haven't seen a more fascist government in the past 100 years because of our unique population. I don't mean to say that we'd see military in our streets without the 2nd amendment, but how much bolder do you think policing policies would be if citizens couldn't fight back? Just playing Devil's advocate. I personally value the 2nd amendment more for my ability to protect myself from evil individuals.
This was a refreshing honest discussion, perhaps the first I have heard on the subject.
I'm a year late in watching this episode, but it's awesome! Thanks Dave for ALL that you do! I've just started following Colion so thanks for having him on!
Same here. Great interview. I hadn't heard of Colion until a few days ago, and he speaks with the voice of reason.
The one weak part of this interview, from both Dave Ruben and Colion Noir, is the part where they are arguing "States Rights" versus "Individual Liberties." Key in this argument, and left unmentioned, is the 14th amendment. Before the 14th amendment, the Bill of Rights only applies as a limit on the Federal Government. After the 14th amendment, other governments had similar limitations. Witness McDonald v Chicago. .... In effect, the 14th capped the States Rights amendment as to personal liberties.... Although, this is but a fraction of the issues created with the passing of the 14th. Otherwise, this was a very nice interview.
Robert Hallifax I may use this in the future. Thank you. Are there any other cases you know of where the 14th amendment limited state governments’ powers on personal liberty?
vgman94 What he's referring to is called "incorporation". If you look it up with that key word, you'll find most of the cases for the amendments that have been incorporated.
The 14th amendment only applied to blacks and CREATED the UNITED STATES citizen and their SUBJECTION.....Did not exist before then.
Colion Noir for President 2024
Change my mind.
Candace Owens
It was a joke dude.
gold-and-black-anarchy As said below, it was a joke. I do not support the NRA in any shape or form. They have done nothing for us except capitulate constantly on an issue that “shall not be infringed.”
I spit upon the NRA.
@@lindsleycravensii2985 I wasn't
John DoMoe apologies friend, that was supposed to be directed at the jack wagon that called me a boot licker.
I really gave up on Marr when he asked why they call it a "gun show." Good grief!
Side note: if you've gone through military basic training, you've slept with your weapon!!! 😜🤣🤣
Monica Craig If your deployed you sleep with it.I sleep with mine by me and I’m not in the military anymore.
As a MARINE,
Your weapon is you life. You go no where without your firearm. You lose your firearm, lose your life.
Are you a Warrior (Soldier, Sailor, Airman, MARINE) ? How can you be without your weapon ?
Your mindset, makes a big difference. You need to decide what you are ? What you are going to be ?
And NEVER LOSE YOUR HONOR.
Which is why many of them have women's names, sounds better when you say I slept with Karen last night.
Been there, done that. Don't lie vets we all have lol
And its super uncomfortable.
@@knutdergroe9757 semper fi brother!
Liberal: I am for gun control and nobody should have guns.
Info Wars: Do you trust the government with guns ?
Liberal: Stays silent.
Anybody who thinks that nobody should have guns is no liberal
Seriously? A liberal staying silent? HAHAHA
I get your point but Info Wars is some "koo koo for coco puffs" levels of crazy
I'm a black liberal Republican and I'm a staunch supporter of the 2A. I know you mean otherside liberals. Here is the problem there are public and grassroots liberals. You'd be surprise, talk to some at the street level as I've done that are left and they're actually for the 2A. I've challenged many before and did Devils Advocate of well don't you think they should ban certain guns just to see what they day. Many shockingly said No. I've had left liberals tell me they don't feel you should have a cold off period either nor a purchase limit in any state. However, these version of liberals will never ever been shown on camera. I have friends that went to the March on VA for the 2A pro- gun rally on 1/20/20. Many of them told me they shockingly ran into liberals that were left, in VA, that were pro-gun and matched with AR's on their necks stating they felt Assault weapon is a BS word and weren't for gun control. I asked why weren't they interviewed? My friend said they were, just edited because they'd kill views and ratings
Adding to the part of the gunshow loophole, most of these sellers are not private. Meaning that you'll still have to go through a background check to walk out with your new possession.
Love long full interviews like this keep them coming. This is the second from your channel I've watched and my impression is you are a decent person looking to have a productive conversation. Liked both videos so going to check out more. You may have a new subscriber.
Colion Noir Is the truth I learned so much from watching him and others videos on the 2a. Coming from NYC living here all my life I never knew I was stripped of my god given rights my whole life. Crimes happen regardless but now I’m suppose to be a victim ? When the police are minutes away, literally I mean minutes because this a crowd busy city, I could be seconds away from losing my life but living in nyc I lost every right to defend my life and leave it up to the horrible NYPD. I should have a right to defend myself against violence. I’ve been suckered into thinking the Democratic Party was my friends my whole life meanwhile they been chipping away at my rights. If I were a criminal the first place I would go to would be places like nyc that doesn’t allow law abiding citizens to have a ccw and protect themselves from criminals, and boy oh boy do we have some unstable mentally ill people roaming around the city committing acts of violence against people. Yeah Wheres the govt when those ppl suddenly wanna stab me to death or something? Stop using mass shootings as a way to un arm law abiding citizens
👌🏾💪🏾
Great interview! Though I disagree with Dave Rubin on so many things I truly enjoy these interviews/discussions because he's respectful enough to let the individual answer.
Noir is awesome. As usual, Rubin is picking all-stars to interview in this fantastic long format. But dammit, my play list is piling up!
For the firearms "debate", make no mistake, anti-gun advocates end game is to ban all firearms. They will compromise to get their incremental bans, one step at a time. Maybe they will stop once we just have rocks and rotten tomatoes to throw, but don't get your hopes up. Then good luck getting all the guns from the criminals (which by writ you've just permanently made all of the currently legal gun owners also).
So as a 2A defender, whenever you get dismissed for digging in your heels or engaging in "slippery slope" arguments about the topic, remember that anti-gun rights advocates are not debating in good faith.
This is one of the better interviews I've seen on YT. Very gud jerb Mr. Ruben!
Mr. Rubin, I have nothing but respect for you. Not because you gave Colion Noir a platform but because you treat each and every guest with respect. You listen, you hear, and you ask intelligent questions. You bring out the underlying facts covered up by noise. You sir, are a rare and magnificent being. Thank you.
Dave, do states have the right to experiment with free speech restrictions? Both speech and the right to bear arms are protected by the same document, so why would you argue that states have the right to tamper with one but not the other? States rights are granted by the Constitution, however those rights are limited only to things not prohibited by the Constitution, or power granted specifically to the federal government. There is no intellectually consistent states' rights argument for allowing states to individually regulate gun ownership.
I want to be clear that I like Dave; I point this out because I like Dave, and I want him to be as good as possible, not just to criticize him.
Scott Phillips States have no right to restrict either one of those. That's why Trump wants to ban gun free zones.
However, private places and business do have the right to restrict those. But all they can do is tell you to leave, because it's not against the law, if it was then it would be a violation of our human rights.
I think gun free zones was a law? That's why most people faught against gun free zones, because it's a violation of our human rights, the 2nd amendment.
@thetechgenius private places may not put 'prior restraint' on people for expressing their thoughts. IMO this should correlate to gun possession as well. There have been certain speech that is not exempt and that may be restricted.
Gun free zones are states infringing again. In reality it's just a bullseye.
Damn, that's a good point. I like it. Keep spreading the word.
Ok now I have seen the entire video, love it even more!! Thanks for having Colion on your channel. ❤️
Loved the dialogue. I am NRA supporter and I've subscribed to your channel because of how you are willing to have these conversations without just slandering or playing games.
I'll let the government buyback all of my guns when it passes the background check
Colion always has the freshest damn kicks in any interview. The drip never quits.