Isn't the today's research going to be from the modern persepctive, whereas the research of Acharya Charaka was from the Ayurveda's Science perspective. And to prove anything today in this world you need to do it from the perspective of Modern Science, hence this is needed and it's no rubbish at all
This type of thinking is restricting global acceptance of Ayurved. Even samhitas were reformed with the course of time like Acharya Vagbhatta deleted some parts of Charaka and Sushruta which were not useful at that time and even added some. Like nowadays, you don't have to wait for 10 months to diagnose where enlarged abdomen is due to Garbha or Raktagulma. You have to research everything so that you can present it in front of everyone. In this process you can even develop your own Ayurvedic research methodology if you'll try. The thing is we'll have to scientifically accept everything and not just spending our lives in arrogance and hating other medicinal streams.
How can u research already researched work by acharya Charak what rubbish is this
Isn't the today's research going to be from the modern persepctive, whereas the research of Acharya Charaka was from the Ayurveda's Science perspective. And to prove anything today in this world you need to do it from the perspective of Modern Science, hence this is needed and it's no rubbish at all
This type of thinking is restricting global acceptance of Ayurved.
Even samhitas were reformed with the course of time like Acharya Vagbhatta deleted some parts of Charaka and Sushruta which were not useful at that time and even added some.
Like nowadays, you don't have to wait for 10 months to diagnose where enlarged abdomen is due to Garbha or Raktagulma.
You have to research everything so that you can present it in front of everyone.
In this process you can even develop your own Ayurvedic research methodology if you'll try.
The thing is we'll have to scientifically accept everything and not just spending our lives in arrogance and hating other medicinal streams.