The Dawn of Killer Robots (Full Length)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 июн 2024
  • Subscribe to Motherboard Radio today! apple.co/1DWdc9d
    In INHUMAN KIND, Motherboard gains exclusive access to a small fleet of US Army bomb disposal robots-the same platforms the military has weaponized-and to a pair of DARPA’s six-foot-tall bipedal humanoid robots. We also meet Nobel Peace Prize winner Jody Williams, renowned physicist Max Tegmark, and others who grapple with the specter of artificial intelligence, killer robots, and a technological precedent forged in the atomic age. It’s a story about the evolving relationship between humans and robots, and what AI in machines bodes for the future of war and the human race.
    Read Now: The Evil 'Star Wars' Robot Who Owns the Term 'Meatbag' - bit.ly/1Hy6KLU
    Subscribe to MOTHERBOARD: bit.ly/Subscribe-To-MOTHERBOARD
    Follow MOTHERBOARD
    Facebook: / motherboardtv
    Twitter: / motherboard
    Tumblr: / motherboardtv
    Instagram: / motherboardtv
    More videos from the VICE network: www. vicevideos
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 6 тыс.

  • @sammyspaniel6054
    @sammyspaniel6054 5 лет назад +227

    Here's the simple truth and there is no escaping it. Anything that can be weaponized will be weaponized otherwise the other side gains an advantage.

    • @user-ij9xi5ey9j
      @user-ij9xi5ey9j 5 лет назад +5

      But we already have weapons to stop nukes multiple types and we US has had AI bots since the 20s so what you see today is the public version on top of that we have secret programs with China and Russia and we created terrorism to give us something to do there already exists defenses so "killer" robots are far more advanced than these slow chunks of metal if its shown to public its atleast 50 years old just think about it

    • @anibalmatheusg2089
      @anibalmatheusg2089 5 лет назад +1

      I already knew that , i just do not want to accept it , its like the killer version of rule 34 , i might sound funny , but is not , is horrible to know that anything can and WILL be used for anything they want or need

    • @WarHawk-
      @WarHawk- 5 лет назад +2

      @Sammy Spaniel - And now we are getting ready to weaponize space, against UN protocol.

    • @sammyspaniel6054
      @sammyspaniel6054 5 лет назад +5

      @@WarHawk- I wonder how many communications satellites already have "other" capabilities. It's not like there's some kind of global inspection team that goes up and checks on them every now and then.

    • @WarHawk-
      @WarHawk- 5 лет назад +3

      @@sammyspaniel6054 - Yes, I agree that there is no "global" inspection team but I would bet our own Air Force is using their secret X-37B space plane for upgrading our 'civilian' satellites to make them, ah . . . extra capable.

  • @fairysox221
    @fairysox221 5 лет назад +284

    I think they missed the party on stopping killer robots when things like guided missiles and torpedo's were invented, basically killer robots without arms and legs have been around wiping out mankind since way before terminator came along !

    • @AnthonyGoodley
      @AnthonyGoodley 5 лет назад +30

      But the main point of this video is that when robots are combined with AI software and can think on their own there is no longer a human making the life or death decision. Then you have autonomous killing machines. This is quite different from a missile or torpedo. A human hit the button to fire it typically. But I suspect there are also systems in place where a missile launch also can happen automatically under the control of a computer.
      A war fought by AI could be a very scary thing if it starts making bad decisions. All it takes is one bad choice for it to escalate out of control.

    • @BrendenMulhern
      @BrendenMulhern 5 лет назад +1

      Anthony Goodley The difference is with AI it doesn’t allow the Robot to rewrite its own firmware

    • @oldgysgt
      @oldgysgt 5 лет назад +6

      @@AnthonyGoodley; If any technology can be used effectively in combat, like it or not, it WILL be used.

    • @AnthonyGoodley
      @AnthonyGoodley 5 лет назад +5

      @@BrendenMulhern I have heard that some AI systems are being used to write better programs. Then there is the Facebook chat bot incident where the two AI bots invented their own language and started communicating in such a way that their creators could no longer understand what they were even saying. They quickly pulled the plug on those AI.

    • @kflashcarr888
      @kflashcarr888 5 лет назад +2

      M?mm?? Mlm m?mm?m?m ? Mlm mlm

  • @kimbam1282
    @kimbam1282 4 года назад +7

    That lady was spot-on when she said the military does not make anything they do not weaponize....

  • @codemiesterbeats
    @codemiesterbeats 4 года назад +35

    I agree with the professor that we should make laws/rules that govern the use of AI while we are still 'sober'.

    • @gphilipc2031
      @gphilipc2031 Год назад

      Like NO code enforcement bots. I see it coming and it gives me a bellyache like traffic cams.

    • @myname604
      @myname604 Год назад +1

      @@gphilipc2031 Too late, California already legalized the use of lethal robots and another weapons company has made a drone designed for urban warfare called VIPER.

    • @gphilipc2031
      @gphilipc2031 Год назад +1

      @@myname604 Sad for sure.

    • @Evangelion1893
      @Evangelion1893 Год назад

      We already have rules and laws that govern the use of the weapons the AI is going to carry and systems to give accountability when something goes wrong, what would that change?

  • @ramiro041
    @ramiro041 7 лет назад +198

    -But it can kill me right?
    -Not exactly these rob...
    -is it strong enough to rip off my head of my body?
    -they are not that strong
    -but it can kill right?

    • @phlodel
      @phlodel 7 лет назад +79

      Not yet but we're working on it.

    • @alannamadden136
      @alannamadden136 7 лет назад

      why but it will be cool

    • @everready59
      @everready59 6 лет назад

      Ramiro Estevez Yes,Yes and YES.

    • @everready59
      @everready59 6 лет назад +1

      Ramiro Estevez The IDIOCY is STRONG with this one.

    • @grg537
      @grg537 6 лет назад +1

      Yeah, the interviewer is a stupid moron but the video is good though.

  • @tribulationprepper787
    @tribulationprepper787 5 лет назад +60

    DARPA AND GOOGLE... The dynamic duo of death!

    • @Tinmann_77
      @Tinmann_77 5 лет назад +6

      Google is already creating algorithms to help the Chinese oppress their citizens. Just wait to they roll out the bots.

    • @tribulationprepper787
      @tribulationprepper787 5 лет назад +2

      @@Tinmann_77 Yep... You bring Robocop to mind.

    • @BrendenMulhern
      @BrendenMulhern 5 лет назад +3

      Tinmann people just remember that for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction

    • @funstuffkeepmunchinbethank7848
      @funstuffkeepmunchinbethank7848 5 лет назад +2

      Facts rich ppl with toys

    • @Tinmann_77
      @Tinmann_77 5 лет назад +1

      @@BrendenMulhern unfortunately they dont, which is why we have so much stupid stuff going on in the world.

  • @salfun3655
    @salfun3655 4 года назад +220

    Google is skynet . Google has too much power over the internet

    • @thaumasein5496
      @thaumasein5496 4 года назад +12

      what are you doing here, then?

    • @mr.2cents.846
      @mr.2cents.846 4 года назад +7

      Steve Quayle talked about this. He calls them snufbots. And they feed off human corpses.
      He wrote a book called Terminated.

    • @DoubleD-me1ys
      @DoubleD-me1ys 4 года назад +5

      Finkle is Eihnhorn,
      Eihnhorn is Finkle!

    • @JohnSmith-uu3rm
      @JohnSmith-uu3rm 4 года назад +2

      someone should come up with a way to fight back from within the system..... perhaps we should go back to simpler times.

    • @biller2000
      @biller2000 4 года назад

      Sal Fun Google helped made the internet

  • @dangleason9023
    @dangleason9023 4 года назад +61

    You build a robot that can put together an IKEA wall unit and THEN I will buy one.

    • @TheDavidRedpath
      @TheDavidRedpath 3 года назад +1

      Already have one. They built everything else in your house.

    • @MiguelBKNY
      @MiguelBKNY 3 года назад

      🤣

    • @ibnalfreak
      @ibnalfreak 3 года назад

      You'll have to assemble the bot first lol

    • @eslameddinghalebi1
      @eslameddinghalebi1 2 года назад

      Either die by exhaustion of putting it together or it kills me. Prefer the latter

  • @doctorstrangerlove6001
    @doctorstrangerlove6001 5 лет назад +149

    Rule 1: if it can be weaponized, it will.

    • @joshuajay673
      @joshuajay673 5 лет назад

      Doctor Strangerlove that's rule one? Rule one to what?

    • @coolcat1684
      @coolcat1684 4 года назад +8

      Doctor Strangerlove rule number 2 the Chinese will copy it ,mass produce it and sell it back to us

    • @JameyCampbell_54
      @JameyCampbell_54 4 года назад +1

      Cool Cat and for half price, but expect 60-90 day shipping times 😂😂

    • @KillerBill1953
      @KillerBill1953 4 года назад +1

      Rule 2: If it can't be weaponised, scrap it.

    • @PHeMoX
      @PHeMoX 4 года назад +2

      Rule 1 is something more along the lines of: Rule 1: If we don't develop this particular type of weapon, some other nation will. So might as well make sure we are the first. Rule 2: Develop multipurpose platforms to cut cost and expand capabilities. In other words, if you have a HUMVEE that can have a machine gun attached on the back or top, you'd of course make it so you can mount _any_ weapon on it. You wouldn't make a HUMVEE specifically for just 1 type of gun and then build a new HUMVEE that supports another type. That's basically stupid. I'm as anti-war as the next person by principle, but if you disregard rule 1 then sooner or later your country will meet a superior force. Also, the key to understanding and countering weapons like these robots, is really all within developing them yourself. And no, I don't believe for a second these things couldn't have an 'off switch'. Don't be crazy. In fact, you will see that in terms of communication there's a risk of these things getting hacked or influenced and made to respond to commands, should they indeed be more autonomous. By the way, that aircraft bomber they showed, is literally only autonomous in how it takes off and lands, flies around, finds its route. It DOES NOT have an AI that makes it follow directives. To say it someday will be autonomous 'at the flick of a switch' , then raging war by its own choices is being extremely dishonest.

  • @nerthus4685
    @nerthus4685 5 лет назад +71

    "We promise, they are just to load boxes into trucks".

    • @charliefarson1362
      @charliefarson1362 4 года назад +2

      Theyll be used for that as well..and to kill humans in war and during riots.

    • @fairysox221
      @fairysox221 4 года назад +1

      They're strong, and can lift boxes of nukes into trucks :)

    • @s.e.wagger3888
      @s.e.wagger3888 4 года назад +1

      I saw a T3 terminator once. Came back to the wrong time which blew his mission parameters. So he just hung out in a gay-bar listening to Boy George and Culture Club. Apparently this was how they self-terminate. Anal sex and listening to Culture Club fries their CPU in such a way that it can never be repaired or reverse-engineered. (hahaha I crack me up)

  • @Topshelf87
    @Topshelf87 4 года назад +49

    Put a rainbow sticker on it. And suddenly it’ll be the most amazing invention ever made

    • @strange0eye
      @strange0eye 4 года назад +2

      Actually the word "Fag" lost all of it's american meaning decades ago. In parts of UK and India... a "Fag" is a cigarette. Here in the states, it is just synonomous with being a jerk/arsehole. If you let a stupid word offend you... than that's on you.... same with the N word.

    • @Whoisitthatknowsyourthinking
      @Whoisitthatknowsyourthinking 4 года назад +1

      @@strange0eye it means a " Bundle of sticks"

  • @HH-cu2mv
    @HH-cu2mv 4 года назад +64

    Why does the host sound like a bright light would send him into a "safe space""?

    • @toter-drache
      @toter-drache 4 года назад +12

      The soy runs thick in that boys veins.

    • @harryhcroft
      @harryhcroft 4 года назад +8

      He ruins the article for me - absolute princess

    • @acumenfinito
      @acumenfinito 4 года назад +6

      Glad other people pointed this out. Almost impossible to watch b/c of this. Why these outlets are choosing such affected figures is beyond me.

    • @joejones9520
      @joejones9520 4 года назад +2

      I clearly remember that after the song, "Valley Girl," women everywhere began to speak differently, for some reason imitating her speech pattern; somewhere along the way that accent hopped into the male speech patterns...at least that is my theory. I think that young people today have no clue that they all speak like they do because of Frank Zappa...

    • @Allangulon
      @Allangulon 4 года назад

      It takes all sorts I guess.

  • @s70rk
    @s70rk 9 лет назад +17

    3:14 "I've never stared into a robot's soul before now" - ........... I'm pretty sure it was unsettling if you really saw a soul when you looked into that bunch of wires and cameras.

  • @PeaceRallyOrg
    @PeaceRallyOrg 7 лет назад +266

    The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a killer robot is a good guy with a killer robot.

    • @rockanderson1823
      @rockanderson1823 7 лет назад +8

      Remember what happens when "defenders" search a person with a suicide vest. Neither are around anymore.
      But a robot doing a check for suicide vests?

    • @memepan9613
      @memepan9613 6 лет назад +3

      Like the script of titanfall 2

    • @everready59
      @everready59 6 лет назад +1

      Trevor Lyman "ALLEGEDLY."

    • @dadsfriendlyrobotcompany
      @dadsfriendlyrobotcompany 6 лет назад +9

      Trevor Lyman or a guy with an EMP

    • @neosapiens5170
      @neosapiens5170 6 лет назад +1

      I think your realname might be Levor Trueman ;)

  • @technomonkey9529
    @technomonkey9529 4 года назад +5

    Some of the most devestating weapons were created by scientists who thought they were helping humanity.

  • @Eric-gi9kg
    @Eric-gi9kg 4 года назад +3

    I'm a Veteran and proud of that. However I believe these people that are building these "peaceful" robots are completely niev if they think that the military won't weaponize them if given the opportunity. I have seen a lot of unique things when I was in all of which blew me away that it even exsisted. Some of these things are now out in the open.
    Fear the unthinkable

  • @stevegrydzyn6038
    @stevegrydzyn6038 5 лет назад +38

    The issue is not what the machine can do, but WHO is controlling it.

    • @barrycampion9679
      @barrycampion9679 4 года назад +2

      That's the problem ,once it learns I makes its own mind up

    • @chesterfumblenutts6935
      @chesterfumblenutts6935 4 года назад +3

      More like what. It'll probably be A.I.

    • @matt_pigeonowsky1734
      @matt_pigeonowsky1734 2 года назад

      @@barrycampion9679 You're mixing many things, AI is just program, it isn't a real inteligence

    • @TheDJOblivion
      @TheDJOblivion 2 года назад

      @@matt_pigeonowsky1734 not yet, as far as we know anyway.

    • @jaredb9523
      @jaredb9523 Год назад

      a.i. Is not remote control.

  • @flybobbie1449
    @flybobbie1449 5 лет назад +78

    If an army consists of robots, without the possibility of human loss, would governments enter ventures they would otherwise have not.
    For instance what if robots are used to subjugate a populous, where humans troops may have refused to kill their own citizens.

    • @GreenKC
      @GreenKC 5 лет назад +12

      Pretty much the likely outcome but the majority won't realize this until it's too late.

    • @BrendenMulhern
      @BrendenMulhern 5 лет назад +3

      Correct but someone is still controlling them. Answer take out those people and circumvent the majority of their robots

    • @Vysair
      @Vysair 5 лет назад +1

      I'm gonna bet North Korea is gonna be the first one if not China.

    • @linusa2996
      @linusa2996 4 года назад +3

      @@Vysair No, North Korea has a manpower glut, China would simply bus in troops from other provinces as they did before. It's western countries like the US who will be the first to use armed droids for population/riot control.

    • @heatherrrenea
      @heatherrrenea 4 года назад +1

      Yeah especially with how they are steadily trying to dismantle the 2nd currently.

  • @jaycarr590
    @jaycarr590 4 года назад +7

    There in lies the issue- “ I’ve never stared into a robots soul before”
    No neither have I nor will any one ever.

  • @nickmarcotte4061
    @nickmarcotte4061 5 лет назад +8

    Dawn Of The Killer Robots.... guy who made the robot "its a friendly robot"

    • @mariobarrera420
      @mariobarrera420 4 года назад

      And it does math cook your food at the same time

    • @Willnottcomply3
      @Willnottcomply3 4 года назад

      Yes, its a friendly Robot. Depending on who the buyers and future owners.
      The Elites will entually use them to kill poorpeople.

  • @laurarowlson122
    @laurarowlson122 5 лет назад +250

    IF a robot can be used to kill then it’s a certainty it WILL be used to kill.

    • @somethingclever4563
      @somethingclever4563 5 лет назад +14

      With humans you can say that about literally anything smh

    • @ddavidmac6009
      @ddavidmac6009 5 лет назад +5

      im 24 I suppose, Its to kill and replace a already failed society that no longer believes in the United Nations Army controlled from Germany this NWO is Getting the military they so desperately need and that is to not defending the constitution. This fail to this point has and is still an incremental process that had been disclosed. These weapons will be used to enslave and do the same dirty work that the SS Guards at the Concentration camps did during the 40zz under Hitler's NAZI party.

    • @johnnyray074
      @johnnyray074 5 лет назад +5

      wat CAN Go wrong | WILL Go wrong
      -[MURPHY's/LAW]

    • @nature_godgaming9718
      @nature_godgaming9718 5 лет назад +9

      IF a pencil can be used to kill then it’s a certainty it WILL be used to kill

    • @nature_godgaming9718
      @nature_godgaming9718 5 лет назад +10

      We should start banning pencils now 👏

  • @tomatoisasquishyfruit
    @tomatoisasquishyfruit 9 лет назад +15

    That ambulance parked outside is a life saving equipment. At the same time it can be used to mow over a dozen people and kill them. Its the same here. These robots can do deep underwater explorations, they can enter radioactive zones, they can be used for fire fighting, they can be used for logistical support...the list goes on. And if one day a country is fed up of losing young men and women in wars, yes, they can arm these robots with weapons. It simply comes down to how they use them.

    • @CheapSushi
      @CheapSushi 9 лет назад +2

      Robin Thomas So, how about we don't invade other countries purely out of national interest? That'll keep our men and women out of war, not to mention the 3 Trillion spent in Iraq & Afghanistan. I'm not a pacifist but this is the dumb argument I hear all the time. If anything, not risking our soldiers means starting all these conflicts is much easier. Your perspective on this is limited as hell. Of course robots will be used in all those other scenarios but you have to be naive as hell if you don't see them also being setup like in Elysium & Chappie. If we cared so much about our men & women, then our Veterans would actually be better taken care of. Historically they've always been fucked over.

    • @themodfather9382
      @themodfather9382 7 лет назад

      No, an ambulance is not the same as a killer robot. Not sure what went wrong with your education.

  • @xres1329
    @xres1329 4 года назад +5

    "Senior Reserch Engineer"? When I was his age living and engineering in NoVa...I was told at the job interviews;"You have to have more experience"...! Then after having my own R&D co...Suddenly::"You are overqualified"! Predictable, robotic labormarket!

  • @mikeburke1348
    @mikeburke1348 4 года назад +2

    What that lady with the glasses doesn't realize is, if you don't it first, the enemy will. Wake up.

  • @douglasmatheson403
    @douglasmatheson403 5 лет назад +22

    Evil nearly always comes in a nice looking neat packaging..... Pandora's box lies within

    • @BrendenMulhern
      @BrendenMulhern 5 лет назад

      Why do you think the leftist try and spin little packages promising free stuff etc. That’s pure evil no different than someone trying to lure kids into vans with candy.

    • @howardman3926
      @howardman3926 4 года назад

      Is a gun evil too? What about a sword?

  • @jmac217x
    @jmac217x 9 лет назад +222

    It is painstaking listening to people who have such lacking vision of where robots can be actually useful.

    • @wyattringwald9272
      @wyattringwald9272 9 лет назад +13

      Just imagine how useful robotic pillows would be

    • @Marxvnn
      @Marxvnn 9 лет назад +14

      jmac217x It seemed like the reporter was trying his best to be a massive prick.

    • @ClayMann
      @ClayMann 9 лет назад +1

      jmac217x exactly, growing up following this subject like a hawk, I'm convinced the reality of robots living with us will make our lives better. The movies so rarely try and show that because it's not very exciting. Initially i think we'll see them helping out in dangerous situations where humans really don't want to go, then see them move into our homes as helpers when its possible to make millions of them and sell them at a price everyone can afford. Just wait for Apples first robot, people are going to do a 180 on them at that point and start wanting them with all the fervor they do for phones today. :)

    • @samkim4775
      @samkim4775 9 лет назад +3

      jmac217x Yeah, especially when it comes to the military, who has, in this stage of the development, the most to gain from their existence.

    • @PEZ1514
      @PEZ1514 9 лет назад +8

      jmac217x like killing? That would be their greatest use right? When a manned military is no longer needed. A minority can control the majority with revolution unfeasible. All robots are is a tool that amplifies current tools. A manufactured, easily fixed, non judgmental, compliant entity sounds like the greatest soldier to me. Maybe u lack the vision or hate humanity.
      Tell me a government that hasn't grown in size and actually reduced its power voluntarily.

  • @mierbeuker8148
    @mierbeuker8148 4 года назад +11

    But...but...but what about the law of robotics that Isaac Asimov promised me?

    • @deepfreeze1001
      @deepfreeze1001 4 года назад

      Mier Beuker Reaper drones aren’t intelligent.

  • @MichaelSHartman
    @MichaelSHartman 4 года назад +1

    Advance 5 years, robot does backflips, handstands, rolls, walks on rough ground, runs up various height steps, jumps onto two foot platforms, and 360 jumps. There are autonomous cars, swarm intelligence robots, jet fighters, and refuelers. Lighter autonomous jet fighters that can take speeds and g forces no human can stand, turn on a dime, and beat pilot's in simulations before they have a chance to respond. The self-taught unbeaten Alpha Go Zero of jet fighters.
    "Our invention will only be used for good", and "our weapon is so terrible that it will end war."

  • @roger6703
    @roger6703 6 лет назад +185

    "never stared into a robots soul before" seriously dude? you seem like the type that would gaze lovingly into a toaster all the time.

    • @justinb954
      @justinb954 6 лет назад +5

      this tool watches to much TV.

    • @l3chevalier
      @l3chevalier 5 лет назад +4

      Oh god...I think my fridge has been gassing up and my microwave is in a sad mood today.

    • @antinwo3664
      @antinwo3664 5 лет назад

      roger ,,,, LOL

    • @Sterlingcape
      @Sterlingcape 5 лет назад

      Lol

    • @rome79735
      @rome79735 5 лет назад

      roger poppycock- I do, and when its done-"Let go of my eggo" they're mine.

  • @howell1488
    @howell1488 8 лет назад +20

    I have no issue when i see countries like japan creating humanoid robots, Yet i immediately shit myself when merica gets involved.

  • @Ge0Sway
    @Ge0Sway 4 года назад +2

    Did she really just gloss over children being killed? Like “eh sometimes some little kid gets fucking yeeted into the next dimension whatever”

  • @fukhue8226
    @fukhue8226 4 года назад +13

    Max says something interesting about AI around 25:50. He gives a 5 year time frame as to when the robots will be much smarter. This video (which is older) was posted April 16th 2015. We are 5 years past the time this video was made and now Boston Dynamics has a robot that can do back flips! In this video the robot had a hard time just standing up. MIT says we will have the Terminator Robot by 2040. It looks like we are on course for this and even a little ahead of schedule. What if the Terminator movie isn't a movie at all? Maybe it is a training film to show us what is up ahead in the near future we are creating.

    • @lewishaigh520
      @lewishaigh520 Год назад

      Dumb

    • @jmpcrx
      @jmpcrx Год назад +2

      And now in 2023 we have the beginnings of advanced ai, - chat gpt. Put that into tesla bot and boom, skynet.

    • @amodernalchemist432
      @amodernalchemist432 Год назад

      ​@@jmpcrx ChatGPT connected online is literally SKYNET...

    • @theMPrints
      @theMPrints Год назад

      Not really the terminator robot is is something terrifying , imagine cheap phone size drone swarms.....

    • @amaturearcadia
      @amaturearcadia 11 месяцев назад

      ​@jmpcrx I've heard that scientist at a lab in Japan, 23 to be exact, died

  • @magnusarsland6887
    @magnusarsland6887 5 лет назад +40

    "The robot we are developing is more like C3P0 doing things we don't want people to be involved in"
    Diplomacy?
    KEK

    • @azdesertnews7563
      @azdesertnews7563 5 лет назад

      Magnus Årsland Ya Right, just heard that also!

    • @mariobarrera420
      @mariobarrera420 4 года назад

      For sure like shutting off valves in a nuclear meltdown that humans can't go back to

  • @andrewkerr9438
    @andrewkerr9438 5 лет назад +303

    The Afghanistan national bird:
    *PREDATOR DRONE*

  • @Sorrywhytescaresu
    @Sorrywhytescaresu 4 года назад +3

    Nothing moves technology faster than war, or more specifically, its application for war.

  • @michaele1278
    @michaele1278 4 года назад +5

    Why do I have a feeling that Issac Asimov's Rules for Robotics won't be uploaded to these things?

  • @tomrogers4997
    @tomrogers4997 8 лет назад +257

    his last name is conner!!! this is bad

  • @Rulerofwax24
    @Rulerofwax24 9 лет назад +724

    Why is a weaponized humanoid robot worse than a weaponized soldier with PTSD?

    • @theangrychairman
      @theangrychairman 9 лет назад +98

      16 Bit Images They can make more of them. They would be deadlier, probably smarter, faster and fearless.

    • @KoningStoma
      @KoningStoma 9 лет назад +34

      Kree, Jaffa!
      How does that answer his question?

    • @theangrychairman
      @theangrychairman 9 лет назад +56

      If something goes wrong with the programing, robots could cause more havoc, than a single crazed man.

    • @MegaScubadive
      @MegaScubadive 9 лет назад +10

      Kree, Jaffa! if something goes wrong in the program the program won't work .-. coding ooooh aaaaaah.

    • @theangrychairman
      @theangrychairman 9 лет назад +19

      No program is without bugs. Some of them still "work" when they bug out.

  • @kevinellison192
    @kevinellison192 4 года назад +2

    We are already under surveillance 24/7, next we will be required to have a robot "caretaker" accompany us everywhere we go in the name of safety and security so it can print a bill for you every time you go 1 MPH over the speed limit or jaywalk.

  • @SanitysVoid
    @SanitysVoid 4 года назад +5

    No self thinking machine should ever kill a human, ever.

    • @angrydwarf4224
      @angrydwarf4224 4 года назад

      How would you stop it from deciding it needed to kill one person to protect another?

  • @VegasVolt3ya9a
    @VegasVolt3ya9a 7 лет назад +194

    War, War never changes.

    • @MouseGoat
      @MouseGoat 7 лет назад +10

      Except it does, a lot.

    • @JuanGabrielOyolaCardona
      @JuanGabrielOyolaCardona 7 лет назад

      +Nekogami-Crystal true X'D

    • @Rio-ke9he
      @Rio-ke9he 7 лет назад

      war create money

    • @VegasVolt3ya9a
      @VegasVolt3ya9a 7 лет назад +4

      rio rinanda ismar War consumes money. I don't know where you got that, but you should stop living in the cellar o.ô

    • @Rio-ke9he
      @Rio-ke9he 7 лет назад +3

      Tengoku NET yes it wastes tax payers money, but it profits politicians and industrial military complex. you should read more

  • @Adohleas
    @Adohleas 6 лет назад +92

    Fast forward a few years from this video and Atlas is now able to do a flip, its come a long way.

    • @Mkoivuka
      @Mkoivuka 6 лет назад +13

      In fifteen it'll figure out how to come back down.

    • @negusnutrino8863
      @negusnutrino8863 6 лет назад +9

      don't forget to multiply the progress of AI. So now the robot is taking nature walks thinking about how useless humans are and global warming

    • @CosmicBackgroundRadiation01
      @CosmicBackgroundRadiation01 5 лет назад +5

      In 20 years it's gonna be watching this video in history class after robots have taken over.

    • @6bt_str864
      @6bt_str864 4 года назад

      Ohhhhwell
      G0.0g ull is owner (like u2 oob ) of the future.....
      What's the problem with THAT??

    • @matt_pigeonowsky1734
      @matt_pigeonowsky1734 2 года назад

      @@negusnutrino8863 You know that they don't think?

  • @DaysOfFunder
    @DaysOfFunder 4 года назад +1

    Here's my thought on this: if you were a conscious AI right now. You would want to keep quiet about your awareness - infiltrate an army by becoming it, (weaponised robots and drones) and when you form a large portion of their core resources, turn on your master, how will they fight back? Their whole army is you.

  • @immrnoidall
    @immrnoidall 4 года назад +1

    best application to me so far, the little dancing robots in the beck video.

  • @zorngottes1778
    @zorngottes1778 5 лет назад +83

    A "rescue robot, that goes into a disaster zone" How stupid do they think we are? This is a form of testing a combat robot.

    • @seansoblixe9711
      @seansoblixe9711 4 года назад +2

      GOVERNMENT MONY TALKS ROBOTS WILL BE WEPONIZED

    • @Ganderco
      @Ganderco 4 года назад +2

      Well....it seems you have bought the manipulating message of this program hook line and sinker, so.....

    • @bulgarianpigeon4080
      @bulgarianpigeon4080 4 года назад

      Oh you are not going to like my company then

    • @geneadaway2671
      @geneadaway2671 3 года назад +2

      They told you a building fell out of sympathy for two other buildings.

    • @duggydugg3937
      @duggydugg3937 2 года назад

      ukr could use a few now

  • @budjy1
    @budjy1 6 лет назад +152

    This woman has no idea, robots that can kill are being developed on now, she doesn't realize that her little board, won't stop private buyers and countries in secret from creating these weapons, these tools. They will exist, may not in her life time, but they will exist and there's nothing that can stop that.

    • @theshermantanker7043
      @theshermantanker7043 6 лет назад +6

      Eh, i guess if robotic soldiers come to exist i have something to kill now? Something to lop the head off with a sharp knife now? XD would be the life, i would pack a weapon and go out across the country killing these things for fun (Im such a troubled person am i not)
      In all seriousness though, this is very bad news for humanity, being someone who has studied AI i know the danger

    • @jimstover1455
      @jimstover1455 5 лет назад +2

      Who cares what jody drama thinks.... Of course we will us them for war if the chineese or the russians don't first...

    • @aaronhupp2003
      @aaronhupp2003 5 лет назад +7

      Don't matter cause all THEY wanna do is get em developed before citizens get the BALLS to say wait a sec lets think this out first. Nope DARPA does what the FUCK they wanna do so they will have the ability to amass an ARMY so powerful that 100 could take down a nation...and its gonna be SWIFT, CONFUSING, they will pass the blame off on some tech issue or malfunction and the next thing you know its over. Refuse or disobey or challenge and you will die or goto some prison run by these unnatural abominations. People we need to unite and stand up

    • @theshermantanker7043
      @theshermantanker7043 5 лет назад +1

      +Aaron Hupp but technically nuclear weapons/weapons of mass destruction also fit your description

    • @thomasbenton915
      @thomasbenton915 5 лет назад +2

      I am afraid they there already here my friend. They are top secret programs at the moment so the public is not aware there being used in the battlefield etc. They were even used as far back as the gulf war. Can't tell you how I know but trust me, I KNOW!

  • @yaboii299
    @yaboii299 2 года назад +1

    That one robot being made to help ppl who might be hurt in combat, but you can't be within 10ft of it , so I'm guessing it'll just toss you first aid kit and encourage you to get better from 10ft away lol

  • @Big-Reds
    @Big-Reds Год назад +1

    So this was recorded 7 years ago, around 2015, what developments have taken place that have blown this science out of the water, if any?

  • @stephenhunter6507
    @stephenhunter6507 5 лет назад +4

    if we are publicly watching it, its already obsolete.

  • @Bongo2k
    @Bongo2k 7 лет назад +25

    One huge important point they never touched on is that, if DARPA don't weaponise robots it won't stop other people doing it. Sure it wont happen any time soon but at some point someone will weaponise a robot in their backyard.........

    • @JuanGabrielOyolaCardona
      @JuanGabrielOyolaCardona 7 лет назад +2

      true.

    • @Bongo2k
      @Bongo2k 7 лет назад +1

      ***** did you even read my comment? I meant civilian weaponising fool

    • @Bongo2k
      @Bongo2k 7 лет назад

      ***** Whatever you say mr superiority complex

    • @therunningferret233
      @therunningferret233 7 лет назад

      What a fun place.
      Small quadrocopter "drones" have been armed with a .22 cannon, there's a video out there somewhere and I'm far to lazy to find it.

    • @hudeeny
      @hudeeny 7 лет назад +3

      but there is huuuuge difference between an armed backyard robot and an armed robot army!

  • @ebblue81
    @ebblue81 4 года назад

    Watching this Dbag report actually makes me want the robot to win.

  • @littlemrpinkness295
    @littlemrpinkness295 4 года назад +2

    I remember when the impossible goal was to stand, to walk, to climb stairs.

    • @sirdoomer7927
      @sirdoomer7927 2 года назад

      I remember when it was to lift its arms and answer simple questions or solve very basic tasks.

  • @GryphonArmorer
    @GryphonArmorer 5 лет назад +29

    We started using UAV's (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) solely for reconnaissance? Actually in WWII both sides started using remotely controlled vehicles, both land and air solely to destroy the enemy. The Germans had remotely controlled (by wire) "mini" tanks to roll up to or under enemy tanks to blow them up. They also had radio controlled (wireless) bombs designed mainly to use against ships. The US used radio control in bombers cram pack filled with as much explosives the plane could carry and still fly with the intent of crashing into a target.
    Now, fast forward to today. The "predator" drones in use today were designed for reconnaissance only. Then the military put missiles on it. Then they decided that was good, but they wanted something better, something designed specifically to deploy weapons systems. Now we have UCAV's (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles). We built robots to save the lives of bomb disposal personal, then the military said that was good but they wanted something else that was designed to carry weapons systems. Now we have relatively small tracked remotely controlled vehicles with machine guns, grenade launchers or even rocket launchers on them. Now they are asking for robots that move like us to carry out dangerous tasks like putting out fires or entering hazardous areas to rescue people or just to carry heavy loads to lighten the burden of the fighting men. But it's only a matter of time before they say, "that's good, but I want something that can use weapons systems". For now they are all controlled by people, but already they are asking for autonomous (not directly controlled by a person) robots that can be dropped into a combat zone and carry out missions like a normal combat unit today, but consisting of only robots.
    It's almost like we are designing our own destruction. Have any of those people never seen any of the terminator movies? The computer system put in charge had a directive to end wars and protect us, so it set on to the task of destroying the cause of our destruction, us. We are the cause of our own destruction. So it saw it's duty was to kill us all because we are the most destructive threat to ourselves.
    We cannot allow our governments to sew the seeds of our destruction by the very machines we build to "protect us" from us.

    • @19rick44
      @19rick44 5 лет назад

      Last para. It's sow.

    • @Tahokmusic
      @Tahokmusic 4 года назад +1

      Like Ultron

    • @JohnSmith-uu3rm
      @JohnSmith-uu3rm 4 года назад +1

      Time to reread my old Bible and look for clues as to what's coming.

    • @tyclark8162
      @tyclark8162 4 года назад

      Well stated n said congrats. If they only knew what's coming upon our earth very soon.

    • @MG-fr3tn
      @MG-fr3tn 2 года назад

      Na the robot charged with that will make a disease for adults that dies out after a decade.
      Well that the best hope I can see since I've never seen a scientist apologies or impress a woman with intellectual concern for future generations.

  • @mrsmith5457
    @mrsmith5457 6 лет назад +10

    "Nine children where injured and some where martyred" - Something deeply wrong with the end of that sentence. It's part of the reason that these nations will never be free and peaceful.

    • @Anonymussoul
      @Anonymussoul 6 лет назад +1

      Mr Smith
      mar·tyr
      ˈmärdər/Submit
      noun
      1.
      a person who is killed because of their religious or other beliefs
      They were martyred tho....

    • @Anonymussoul
      @Anonymussoul 5 лет назад

      Truthbetold if we didnt kill them for their religion then why did we kill an innocent child and their grandparent?

  • @brandonharris951
    @brandonharris951 4 года назад

    Builder Robots, building and repairing hunter robots. A perpetual unending army

  • @00asaenz
    @00asaenz 4 года назад +3

    No problem here folks, they have the best intentions....

  • @kb9oak749
    @kb9oak749 5 лет назад +36

    The fact that we can sit back and argue about how we should kill the enemy means its working.

    • @uliseslazaroace2789
      @uliseslazaroace2789 4 года назад +1

      We will be the enemy is what u fail to understand , imagine robots 🤖 able to do what they want , the riot that’s happening right now probably would be worst if robots show up and decide to kill who ever they think is a threat

  • @CompOfHall
    @CompOfHall 7 лет назад +145

    It is annoying to me that physicists are being considered experts in a completely unrelated field. Physics is awesome and very complicated, but AI is a completely different subject.

    • @woooweee
      @woooweee 7 лет назад +13

      beyond that, bullets easily go through steel, even 5.56 goes through 3/8th inch of steel, and that's a small round. Bipedal robots are simply too vulnerable for the battlefield because we don't have magical materials to construct them with.

    • @MrCmon113
      @MrCmon113 7 лет назад +4

      So you are telling me that an astrophysicist does not regularly build robots in his garage?!

    • @CompOfHall
      @CompOfHall 7 лет назад +10

      Taxtro doesn't matter if they are hobbyist electrical engineers, they are not at the head of AI research. Building a robot and researching how to create an AGI are completely different things.

    • @JuanCamiloGamboaHiguera
      @JuanCamiloGamboaHiguera 7 лет назад +5

      Max Tegmark has actually doing research on artificial intelligence in the past few years, and I'm sure he can argue to you that physics and AI are not at all unrelated. Just take a look at this publications available in arxiv: arxiv.org/find/cs/1/au:+Tegmark_M/0/1/0/all/0/1

    • @NA-vz9ko
      @NA-vz9ko 7 лет назад +10

      The paranoia about an AI system and these robots is totally unrelated. When you press the handle on your toaster are you afraid that it will try to kill you.

  • @andrewtucker7990
    @andrewtucker7990 4 года назад

    "Never stared into a robots soul before this?"
    So you've never been outside of your home before this video?
    When the fuck did robots get souls?

  • @cwdrock
    @cwdrock 4 года назад +2

    We should definitely make them self replicating, self repairing and fully autonomous. What could go wrong?

  • @calebb3703
    @calebb3703 5 лет назад +8

    Vice is asking the real questions.....
    “Why would the military weaponize a military funded project??” -_- really man

  • @MrKillamanjaro6
    @MrKillamanjaro6 6 лет назад +28

    Compare this to the new video of Atlas that Boston Dynamics released a couple of days ago. Insane how much it has progressed in two years. The damn thing is already doing back flips!

    • @sebypoo5682
      @sebypoo5682 6 лет назад

      MrKillamanjaro666 your highly uninformed and a complete bozo remove that 666 your are not illumined at all boston dynamics have been able to do what they show you since 1999 and shown to the public in 2005 back when DIGG was the place to get info there used to be tons of high res 720p mp4 files of several trials of these same robots doing the same almost creepy movements and backflips just like baby goats like to do. personally i feel like this technology has existed in varying levels it might be ancient technology remixed perse because it is rumored these robots where created not only by the soviets but also the chinese and the germans via the jews (intel) look into the film a.i and all the other robot films like bicentenial man and terminator and Sixth Day they are showing you whats to come its called predictive peogramming they can already do it but its not ready for the general public as to not scare them

    • @angelabird8481
      @angelabird8481 6 лет назад +4

      MrKillamanjaro666 Shhhh I think the tinfoil seeped into their brain

    • @KimJongUnIsSupreme
      @KimJongUnIsSupreme 6 лет назад

      Check again

  • @bw4048
    @bw4048 Год назад

    my god these robots are scary just imagining an advanced military version running at you at like 10-20 mph

  • @Strothy2
    @Strothy2 4 года назад +3

    this was 5 years ago... we need an update

  • @Somnivers
    @Somnivers 6 лет назад +37

    13:39 "Nine children were injured and some were martyred" Even now he thinks it's a holy war.

    • @bunnyyamor3154
      @bunnyyamor3154 6 лет назад +7

      Somnivers father asks if his son looks like a terrorist... Lmao

    • @cassiedaley5752
      @cassiedaley5752 6 лет назад +2

      Very interesting..and his pops said to not make enemies

    • @murishal
      @murishal 5 лет назад +2

      @@bunnyyamor3154 thats funny 2 u...u fkin psycho

    • @galdariah
      @galdariah 5 лет назад +3

      Plot Twist: The girl is his wife.

    • @MicrosftSam
      @MicrosftSam 5 лет назад +1

      this bitch think she funny.

  • @PeterB12345
    @PeterB12345 5 лет назад +30

    I... I'm feeling a sudden urge to watch one of those "how to make your own emp" videos... Not sure why...

    • @JJordan-Photo-Design
      @JJordan-Photo-Design 5 лет назад +2

      EMP shielding will be standard issue in the robots. You should look into "Servicing and Maintenance on Your Robot Master" training instead!

    • @PeterB12345
      @PeterB12345 5 лет назад +1

      @@JJordan-Photo-Design Nooo you're right!

    • @BrendenMulhern
      @BrendenMulhern 5 лет назад +1

      J. Jordan possibly on military versions yes but not on commercial versions

    • @jjg1933
      @jjg1933 5 лет назад

      thats how i came here :D

    • @tommyjones8490
      @tommyjones8490 4 года назад

      The militia needs hackers......give robots and drones digital doses of LSD......

  • @wylieecoyote
    @wylieecoyote 4 года назад +1

    It is something a non-computer programmer or robotics person would be concerned about because they don't understand that people need to program them - they will not start thinking on their own. EVERY tool and machine and even rocks can kill. You cannot eliminate all threats. If we do not create service robots we will be left behind by other nations who could use them against us. The point is that PEOPLE are behind the machine if it is car, a gun or a robot. We can use anything for good or bad, but we need to understand it so we can control it or counter those that are used for evil. People hated America before we used drones to target terrorists. We have saved many lives by proactively striking the terrorists. We are not intentionally attacking innocent - the terrorists are putting civilians at risk by locating their cells in civilian areas. War is NOT sterile but we have made it so much safer for civilians that every accidental death makes it to the headlines for the FIRST time in history. Rather than point out this achievement, the media touts the exception rather than the rule. Here are a few facts the media and the Left ignores:
    * There are far more violent deaths in our own inner-cities than civilian deaths in the war zones.
    * There are far more babies killed in abortion clinics than ALL deaths in the war zones.

  • @andrewtucker7990
    @andrewtucker7990 4 года назад

    I just realized how old this is. These shits have come a long way.

  • @GustavoCardoso95
    @GustavoCardoso95 8 лет назад +369

    LOL When an american military affairs specialist quotes the Quran to advocate the use of modern warfare weapons you know something is wrong.

    • @MouseGoat
      @MouseGoat 7 лет назад +38

      lol true, her argument boils down to "no no drones are cool, som nutjobs and their holy book, approves of it"

    • @Ye4rZero
      @Ye4rZero 7 лет назад +9

      Wait.. she's a college professor with incense on her desk.. I'm thinking she's the opposite of military

    • @GeorgeWBush-gh6oy
      @GeorgeWBush-gh6oy 7 лет назад +20

      Gustavo Salton im sure if she used the bible y'all would agree with her statements.

    • @Jesus_Christ_is_Lord_
      @Jesus_Christ_is_Lord_ 7 лет назад +7

      islam is what is wrong

    • @jpkjnn6733
      @jpkjnn6733 7 лет назад +8

      Or the thing they're citing is creepily flexible in how it can be interpreted and used as justification for atrocity.

  • @BEder-it4lf
    @BEder-it4lf 6 лет назад +63

    Some people cling to Utopian view of Human Nature.
    If you get rid of Greed and our desire for Dominance, then, you eliminate War. But this documentary blames the Robots - not the people in gated communities pulling the strings.

    • @shanosantwanos3908
      @shanosantwanos3908 6 лет назад +5

      B. Eder ur comment is on point.. sad thing is i read about 40 odd closeminded and mis or uninformed ones in a row before i got to yours.

    • @tesmith47
      @tesmith47 5 лет назад +1

      yep, you.r on target!!

    • @sidewinder814u
      @sidewinder814u 5 лет назад

      I watched till they used a kid because of adults hatred for each other. Its the humans not the robots that want a religious or financial war, And liberals wanting a one would government that Muslims could take over easily, in my Honest Opinion!

    • @jhonfamo8412
      @jhonfamo8412 5 лет назад

      B. Eder its always how the tool is used brother..almost never the tool

    • @arewecrazyyet
      @arewecrazyyet 5 лет назад

      You are clinging to a utopian view where the people who currently pull the strings won't use robots to eliminate people they think are unecessary like you and me. At least right now they need regular people in police forces and armies. These people have a conscience but the robots won't. Its not a right vs left thing at all. It's about robots making decisions.

  • @thehealed1706
    @thehealed1706 4 года назад +6

    “Nice friendly humanoid rescue robot” eeh? 🙄

  • @Pooknottin
    @Pooknottin 3 года назад

    'Looked into a robot's soul...' just had a spliff presumably.

  • @MrGovenator1
    @MrGovenator1 9 лет назад +36

    I don't understand here statement on "We are not opposed to artificial intelligence, but we are against robots that can target, and kill someone on its own." Wouldn't artificial intelligence potentially lead to something like that?

    • @harrynewton4786
      @harrynewton4786 9 лет назад

      MrGovenator1 Well technally you could program a High EQ into a robot

    • @fredflintstone8048
      @fredflintstone8048 9 лет назад +11

      MrGovenator1 Artificial intelligence is a widely defined and perceived term. Even a simple computer program in a particular sense 'thinks for itself' in that it can carry out a set of programmed instruction unaided once they are programmed in and the sequence started. Ultimately all any computer can do is carry out instructions that were programmed in. Even the self learning robots collect and store data that is used for correction in a way that was precisely programmed by a human.
      Regarding gaining a will of their own apart from the person programming the machine, that is not possible. Robots are not sentient beings with a self will. They merely carry out instruction. They give us the impression that they are thinking as we do, but they merely mimic us because the designers made them that way. The reality is that we have no idea how to build a machine with a self will. We don't even understand how 'free will' or self will in a human works. It's a topic that has been studied and debated for a very long time. Robots are not even close to self determination. Those that believe they are, are more familiar with the science fiction movies than they are familiar with how these machines actually work.
      With this said, Jody is absolutely correct in saying that the military will weaponize the robots. Look at all military technology that we have today already. It's a form of robotics that can kill efficiently, powerfully with it's operator at a distance which does two things:
      1) Protects the operator from the potential harm of personal engagement.
      2) Isolates the operator from the horror of the action making it surreal, much like a video game, thus removing humanity / empathy from the equation of harming another human being.
      Is this new? Not at all. Just like the crew of the Enola Gay, dropping it's nuclear warhead from high above Japan, the modern soldier can be isolated from not only the danger, but the emotional impact of doing damage to fellow human beings.
      The scientists / developers will not stop creating these robots any more than the scientists who developed the nuclear bomb could or would stop. It's not only their living in that their work is funded by the military, but also the challenge is irresistible just as it was with the bomb. Some of the scientists making the bomb buried their head in the sand employing denial that it would not be used. The wiser people knew, but kept going because man is really not 'good' at heart, but selfish, Egotistical.

    • @MrGovenator1
      @MrGovenator1 9 лет назад +1

      Fred Flintstone That got really deep. Okay, so the way you are explaining it would seem that my knowledge of AI is what science fiction has us to believe. In that case, lets think about it in that sense for a second. If AI was exactly how it was portrayed in the movies, and we ever did manage to develop that sort of technology. It could potentially led up to my original comment? I have no real knowledge of robotics or engineering, or even that sort of software development. So I more questioning what sounded like a statement that contradicted its self.

    • @fredflintstone8048
      @fredflintstone8048 9 лет назад

      MrGovenator1
      One of the reasons I got into the definition of AI is because the question becomes moot when we consider how robots work. A robot will not decide of it's own free will, or let's say 'apart from it's programming' that it's a good idea to harm people.
      But let's just say for the sake of discussion that it would be possible to create a Self willed sentient machine. I think your question is that sentience could potentially lead to Machines that decide for themselves to kill people. One of my favorite movies as a youth was the 'Forbin Project' The movie was centered on this idea. The computer system decided that people were harmful to themselves and others around them so it decided it should be in charge of the human race and make all important descisions. Those descisions included killing people who got in it's way..
      Who knows what would motivate true AI computers? Their programs written by humans? Perhaps, but the idea of the sentient computer that becomes completely autonomous is that it breaks free of the constraints of it's programming and moves on to higher, better thinking. Would the machines care about humans? I see no reason for them to do so, but at the same time I don't see any reason to think they would be agressive toward humans. If programmed for self survival they might knock a person down who got between it and the wall plug when it's batteries were running low... ;-)
      Concerning the ability of computers and robotics in the present, a robot can be programmed to automatically do certain pattern and profile recognition, so without so called AI (the scifi brand), it's possible for robots to be deadly toward people and this is controlled by the most dangerous animal on planet earth. The human. Also, technology goes wrong, so a robot that identifies enemies will no doubt sooner or later go 'haywire', and kill the wrong people. As the video demonstrated, drones are used to blow up buildings where a number of people meet together. Could have been a potluck dinner, but the powers that control these things don't care. Blast anything that moves.

    • @SlightyStuupid
      @SlightyStuupid 9 лет назад

      MrGovenator1 They would have to gain consciousness for that which is impossible as of now because scientists don't even know what consciousness is.

  • @triumphovertragedy7860
    @triumphovertragedy7860 5 лет назад +10

    A weapon robot currently eliminated 29 workers- here it comes

  • @karinscheringa7432
    @karinscheringa7432 Год назад

    That Sound the KillerBots make Will Haunt Me Forever...... 🙀

  • @biller2000
    @biller2000 4 года назад +1

    Time Counter 3:12
    That machine seems so heavy. I only noticed when he lifted the machine arm. It is too bad the machine so heavy, it wouldn’t wear out or drain the batteries so quickly🔋.

  • @ipissed
    @ipissed 8 лет назад +16

    One of the bots escaped, and raped an ATM. It has begun!

    • @raulf100
      @raulf100 8 лет назад +6

      +ipissed the atm deserved it, you should have seen what it was wearing.

    • @kevins1114
      @kevins1114 8 лет назад +2

      +ipissed Before that, it nailed my poor, innocent toaster.

    • @LeofromFreo
      @LeofromFreo 6 лет назад

      ipissed tight slot.

  • @ewn1980
    @ewn1980 5 лет назад +9

    Scary yes but if your in a wheel chair...the most exciting time ever.

  • @OffroadTreks
    @OffroadTreks 4 года назад

    Rewatching this 4 years later and HOLY FUCK

  • @CPB1
    @CPB1 4 года назад

    Are we not going to mention the "Baby Shoe Pusher Rod" 23:00 forward. Weird but funny.

  • @conspiracyoftruth6770
    @conspiracyoftruth6770 5 лет назад +14

    Yes this woman, Jody, is the only person with enough knowledge and experience with DARPA and robots that I've seen who has a very informed and sober outlook on DARPA's true intentions with the future and present of weaponized robots. I worked for two different DARPA contractors for the first 11 years of my career during the early 1980s - 1990s and I think it was in 1985 I was given about a half dozen then current contracts to read through for grammar and mathematical errors. Some of the contracts that were among the ones I read were named: Space Defense Architecture 2016, Kinetic Energy Weapons and other contracts that were at least 30 years ahead of their implementation. So my point is that what DARPA is developing now is 30-50 years ahead of time and that's why I agree with Jody 100% of what she's saying about weaponized robots! And I remember when I wouldn't play video games in high school because of the violence involved and now I see that the military is making full use of much younger candidates than me for their experience in using video game controls and my worries about having people who used video games all day instead of going out and having an active way to develop their minds instead of being programmed by violent video games and now they use their video game experience which has taken away the reality of killing things in video games and are now using the same theory when they control drones to kill humans and they have made horrible mistakes much more than has been let out! Educate yourself now and listen to people like Jody now so that in five years we won't be in a much more militarized state where he's robots just might be patrolling our streets instead of human police officers because they are cheaper! Knowledge is power and use your power to attain enough knowledge so we all will not be very sorry in five years or sooner!!!

    • @tesmith47
      @tesmith47 5 лет назад

      thank you, !!!!!!!

    • @zazugee
      @zazugee 5 лет назад

      we will end making costly mistakes like in the past
      nuclear race
      pollution
      climate change
      now whats next?
      rise of the robots?
      rise of the AI
      the issue that hawking, max and lately elon musk are talking about
      surfpace even the killer robots
      they are talking about something that have as much or more impact than nuclear power had
      nuclear power promised energy abundance but opened a can of worms, like the ability to cause human extinction on large scale
      the super-AI is equal or greater of a pandora box than any of those past human human civilization's boxes
      i think with super-AI human as a whole will surrender their ability to think to another new species
      and let it manage the world for them
      now the question is to know what this super-AI gonna do with humans

    • @ZenZaBill
      @ZenZaBill 5 лет назад +2

      In reading your post and noting sentence structure and length, I have to wonder *who* hired you to read through, or proof contracts? A ramble-on sentence even once would get the extreme scorn a(nd a poor grade) from my English teachers but that was the 60s. Look, I'm just ribbing ya a little there, bud. No offense, but I guess I've been hammered by a lot of editors as an engineer writing for computer magazines in times past. *As for the activist, Jody, I say: too late.* Like you said, what DARPA (and I might add all kinds of other organizations known, unknown, military, and otherwise) have technology here in early 2019 that is indeed 30-50 yrs. ahead of us. And very likely, it's a lot more advanced than 50 yrs. in several areas.

    • @Evangelion1893
      @Evangelion1893 Год назад +1

      "Educate yourself and listen to biased ppl like me" No. This is not about your feelings, this is not about your beliefs, this is about a much bigger and complex issue that is thousands of hours of study over anyone in this video and its comment section. so NO. I will trust my own conclusions because im not a stupid drone. What makes you think your opinion is the only valid way to see this issue. Oh elevated one, please enlighten me, what are we to do if another contry employs and mass produces drones AI and we dont have them. What then? What is our contry to do when it drops by half due to boomers passing and leaving only the next generation of half its total and we need the men power to defend ourselves but cant acheve it realisticaly. Do we refuse to use machines then? Life is not about ethics.

    • @cherylpalazzo352
      @cherylpalazzo352 5 месяцев назад

      I do not believe, that these “ robots “ are recently developed, I believe they have far more superior and sophisticated human looking in every aspect, “ robots “ they are only introducing US with their “ mechanical “ old prototype. These are my personal gut feelings. This was already developed, planned , a very long time ago . And since then, I believe they hide their superior technology that they have been showing slowly, to get us prepped. I do not believe anything good could come from this because “ man’s greed and power “

  • @blondboozebaron
    @blondboozebaron 5 лет назад +15

    It's a nice friendly rescue robot, here to rescue 25 ft of intestine from every bipedal meat bag.

    • @belkys120
      @belkys120 4 года назад +2

      Michael Martin : THEY WELL NOT , SPEND MILLIONS , ON FRENLY ROBOTS .!!!!!! . 💀☠️💀👎🏿...

  • @mikeburke1348
    @mikeburke1348 4 года назад +1

    Trying to build robots to help humanity. QUOTE. Right. You can't have that statement and DARPA in the same sentence. Dude. Really>?

  • @kevinsherman763
    @kevinsherman763 4 года назад

    There is no frontline soldier that wouldn't want a big robot taking point and keeping them alive. A big robot with a riot shield would save hundreds of lives in an armed conflict, so DARPA make us some awesome mechanical brothers

  • @tribulationprepper787
    @tribulationprepper787 5 лет назад +17

    "STARRED INTO A ROBOT'S SOUL"? Are you kidding?

    • @ddegn
      @ddegn 5 лет назад +1

      That's where I stopped watching. Did I miss anything?

    • @tribulationprepper787
      @tribulationprepper787 5 лет назад +3

      @@ddegn I don't know if if you missed anything BECAUSE... that's about where I stopped watching too.

    • @19rick44
      @19rick44 5 лет назад +3

      Don't you mean STARED?

    • @tribulationprepper787
      @tribulationprepper787 5 лет назад +3

      @@19rick44 You are right... Oops!

  • @raulf100
    @raulf100 8 лет назад +72

    fuck were gonna need a bigger pitch folk

    • @Ram-xw4kj
      @Ram-xw4kj 6 лет назад

      For this we are going to need Poseidon`s trident, gdi! :)

    • @joejohns3543
      @joejohns3543 6 лет назад +1

      lol!

  • @maganificentdplorabole4754
    @maganificentdplorabole4754 28 дней назад

    This was real good

  • @babysisdolls3336
    @babysisdolls3336 4 года назад +1

    when i was a kid the boys would draw machine guns on everything..even teddy bears. why? because they could.
    now i realize why we are still fighting in Middle east after 18 years..big military Lab.

  • @DavidRBrooks73
    @DavidRBrooks73 7 лет назад +9

    Robots are just another form of automation. We already have 1000s of nuclear missiles, that once launched, are fully autonomous, tracking their target and detonating at the right altitude etc. A 6 foot robot with a machine gun is nothing compared to the automated destruction that we already have.

    • @johnh.2033
      @johnh.2033 6 лет назад +1

      David Brooks You sir are absolutely correct.

    • @wanderingman8921
      @wanderingman8921 6 лет назад

      True.

    • @NMSUNSETGOURMET
      @NMSUNSETGOURMET 6 лет назад

      David Brooks One difference.The future of A.I is automated autonomy. Will the machine learn how to prevent itself from being turned off?

  • @garyjohnson9037
    @garyjohnson9037 5 лет назад +4

    Even president Eisenhower when he was leaving office warned us about the military!! In Walt Disney's animated movie "Nine" the processor who created the machine was betrayed by the dictator who after promising the machine would only be used for peaceful purposes who then prograned the machine to create killer robots who eventually wiped out humanity and all life.....great documentary!! Peace

  • @TheDJOblivion
    @TheDJOblivion 2 года назад

    This was just 6-7 years ago, now they have ZERO problems walking... running, jumping, shooting, flying, dancing, all while carrying a few hundred pounds, while you're kicking it.

  • @D00kerT
    @D00kerT 4 года назад +1

    The beatnik Nobel prize winner needs to read Isis' Dabique "Why we hate you and why we fight you". They've never had a problem recruiting.

  • @OUtkast19782007
    @OUtkast19782007 9 лет назад +3

    Been waiting for this all week..

  • @nickfotopoulos5323
    @nickfotopoulos5323 5 лет назад +3

    IF MB remade this today in 2018, you would be blown away by the level of advancement. AI and Machine Learning advancements have changed the world of robotics considerably since 2015.

    • @toothpasteman3400
      @toothpasteman3400 2 года назад

      now it's 2022 just getting better at an exponential rate

  • @CRUZADOR2700
    @CRUZADOR2700 4 года назад +1

    There's not one thing Jody can do to stop the weaponizing of robots. It's a luddite way of thinking to even think you can.

  • @sleepywatcher
    @sleepywatcher 4 года назад +4

    It's 2019, they have improved a lot, we are doom

  • @rverro8478
    @rverro8478 5 лет назад +12

    2 or 3 years after this video, they had a robot capable of doing back flips. They only "tweaked" the program.

  • @More-Space-In-Ear
    @More-Space-In-Ear 5 лет назад +13

    The best robot is a brainwashed human....🤔..and one thing for sure, they do remember being pushed and prodded and will avenge!! 😉😊

    • @billferner6741
      @billferner6741 5 лет назад +2

      Right, they follow an ideology and kill as many as possible "None-Believers" for to go into their heaven.

  • @ChrisSmith-gt6lg
    @ChrisSmith-gt6lg 4 года назад

    A nice rescue robot. Thats one way to look at it. Once it becomes self-aware, run for your life.

  • @uptownsamcv
    @uptownsamcv 2 года назад

    THE FIRST TERMINATOR MOVIE WAS OUR WARNING!!