UK Barrister Reacts to Camille Vasquez & Ben Chew Interview
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 июн 2022
- Watch my UK #johnnydepp trial analysis
PART 1:
• UK Barrister Analysis:...
Part 2:
• Depp v Heard UK Judgme...
Petition:
www.change.org/JusticeForJohn...
#JohnnyDepp Playlist:
• Johnny Depp v Amber He...
Check out my exclusive content at www.blackbeltbarrister.com
Also me: ruclips.net/user/blackbeltsecrets?...
My wife's cooking: ruclips.net/user/easychinesecookin...
Address for PAID Formal Advice ONLY: clerks@ShenSmith.com
Disclaimer: Neither this nor any other video, may be taken as legal advice. I accept no liability whatever for any reliance placed upon it, as there is no contract between us and I am not instructed by you.
For formal advice, please contact clerks@ShenSmith.com.
💌 Become a channel member to access stripes and perks!
/ @blackbeltbarrister
MY CAMERA GEAR
🎥 Big Camera amzn.to/3yFFcFf
🎥 Small Camera amzn.to/2RB7ez9
🎙 RODE VIDEOMic Pro+ amzn.to/2QCJURi
Gobe ND Filter amzn.to/2R3eEuA
Neewer Ring Light amzn.to/3aOkLtT
Switch Pod amzn.to/3sZb8yA
JOBY Tripod amzn.to/3dXJYDT
External Media Drive amzn.to/3uxNDOQ And if you like my house and decor:
MY CHAIR:
amzn.to/3mYpPBB
Lamp 1 - amzn.to/3ntbEnm
Lamp 2 - amzn.to/3dXfUZi 🎓 Brilliant contract law book:
amzn.to/2PHC2O1 🎓 Excellent book with an overview of criminal law:
amzn.to/3gTPEAV 🎓 Learn more about trespass and tort law:
amzn.to/32N6TLS
(Affiliate link)
LAW FAQS
• Common Law
CONSUMER LAW PLAYLIST:
• Consumer Law
TREE LAW PLAYLIST:
• Tree Law Miniseries
ROAD TRAFFIC LAW PLAYLIST:
• Road Traffic Law
FAMILY LAW PLAYLIST:
• Family Law
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein.
#blackbeltbarrister #lawyer #barrister
Description contains affiliate links; I will occasionally earn commissions from qualifying purchases or leads generated.
“domestic violence has no gender” best sum up of the trial, Ben and Camille are what great and professional lawyers look like.👍
Fact is, anyone who has lived an adult life or observed it during childhood, KNOWS that Domestic Violence goes BOTH WAYS! I know I have witnessed it whereas my good male friend was disrespected and treated horribly, left one marriage, got into another that was just as bad, then eventually DIED from the MENTAL/EMOTIONAL ABUSE! Interesting fact is that his mother suffered greatly while he was a child & died, & he made up in his heart that he would NEVER mistreat a woman, the way his mom was mistreated, and he too suffered in the end, as she did, HOW FREAKING SAD & HEARTBREAKING!
Absolutely right, Derek.
I'll also add: Elaine is the perfect stereotype of a dishonest lawyer 🤣
This sad experience for Johnny was a glimpse into what he experienced as a child and an awakening what his own father endured. Hope he moves on and doesn’t look back. Silence about and to AH is best for him. Don’t fall into any feelings of guilt or pity for this relationship
Also every ones saying what it means for woman, I actually think we are focusing on the wrong thing her ..... i am a woman and i %100 will speak up for woman rights if i feel they are being discounted but i dont think they are in this case. but there is a different fine lineing and positive effect this case will have ... I would think this is actually a win for men who suffer from DV who are often not believed simply based on their gender its encouraging them to come forward to speak up no longer having to hold there heads in shame because society has a messed up view that men shouldn't be victims because it makes them "babys". they say less men suffer however my personal belief is that less men speak up and come forward (which would mean statistics will be very inaccurate you see this inequality and inaccurate statistics with mental illness for example due to shame placed on one or the other gender when they suffer an illness labled as the opposite genders illness for example; eating disorders (girls) and autisim (boys) even though we now know both genders suffer from these but they are often mis diagnosed or diagnoses is based on out dated studies that gender labeled illneses) as culturally it's seen as weak for a man there is shame put on them etc. end of the day gender dose not exclude any one from being a victim. they hit it on the nail when they siad DV has no gender it's time to start basing our decision on each individual story not by just one person's story every ones is different. domestic violence although not considered a mental illness is still based on old out dated studies that has only caused the gender divide to grow rather than bring them together.
@@theredhotchilipepperssexof4269 Really? then maybe you should have sent it to her lawyers so they could add that to her list of "evidence" or are you referring to the sharp object AH bought for JD in the first place. As a survivor of Dv the LAST thing I would have bough my ex was a sharp object. I would have been far too terrified
The two sets of lawyers are worlds apart. One set fully professional, the other, a gossipy, story-teller/liar. Congratulations to Camille for her well-deserved promition.
Classy, simple, professionals. Absolutely nothing compared to Elaine who was looking for her 15 min of fame by trashing everybody but herself, her team or her client's insane lies. If you don't own your mistakes, you are a liar, don't expect people to feel sorry for you when you lose. JD owned his mistakes, I'm glad he is getting his life back. The jury's verdict was UNANIMOUS.
👏👏👏👍
This ^^^^ Absolutely!
Absolutely. Elaine came across as almost as unlikeable as her client AH. The last turkey in the butcher's shop at Christmas/Thanksgiving didn't help her cause either; its swaying was quite discombobulating.
I 100% agree with you! The difference in the interviews is LIGHT YEARS apart!
Is that why Camille was flirting and hugging Johnny Depp on camera? You clearly have no idea what professionalism is. Did you forget Amber Heard is bisexual? Why didn't Elaine try the same?
These 2 people are so tactful. What a contrast to the members of the other team!
Such a breath of fresh air. I couldn’t even stand to listen to Elaine. Just so much bitterness and accusation. Just like A💩, everything is everyone’s fault but theirs.
I agree. They are professionals and they act like it.
It’s called professionalism. I’d have Ben and Camille to defend me if needed than having Elaine, unorganized, a nervous wreck to represent me.
It is easy to be gracious in victory. Also they have to be careful because they represent a man so anything they say will be twisted and blown out of proportion by the media. Whereas Amber's lawyers can say anything about Johnny cause he is an evil misogynist abusive raping member of the male patriarchy. I add as proof the fact the the media already said everything Amber's lawyers said and have been doing so over a week before the verdict. Except fox.
Camille and Ben were also a perfect representation and reflection of Johnny’s personality too, as Amber’s were for her. (As Elaine continues to prove.)
Elaine should be reprimanded for her statements. Very irresponsible and unprofessional.
I agree
Absolutely , her behavior in the courtroom was unprofessional as well! First thing that comes to mind, is when she mocked Johnny's voice......SO childish
@@shaylatorch Elaine is proof that an idiot can become a lawyer.
For leaking info to the jury about the UK trial, she should be disbarred.
And yet everything nearly everything she says was already said by most of the media. In fact they started saying it a week before the verdict, when it became obvious Amber was going to lose. As a man it is kind of sickening to hear this lawyer and the media claim that Depp is abusing Amber by defending himself. Not only her but all victims, meaning all women, meaning all women are victims of all men.
I am so tired of Amber's side saying "They won" in the UK. That case was not about her and she was not a party to it, only a witness. They need to stop throwing the umbrella over it and claiming it as part of this case, or that this case was already won in the UK and shouldn't have been retried in USA. It. Was. Not. The. Same. Case. Period. This legal team shows so much tact and class by how they discuss things, and I'm glad they stuck up for the jury in this case. Shame on Elaine Bredehoft for insulting the integrity of the jury and the judge.
UK COULD NOW BRING PERJURY CHARGES AGAINST HER IF THEIR WERE INCLINED . SOME OF HER STATEMENTS WERE PROVEN FALSE. BUT THAT WOULD BE BAD FOR ALL VICTIMS RIGHT.
The sun did win, without Amber's testimony the sun would've lost.
Read the uk transcript then tell me who is lying.
Absolutely!
@Lynda Shaw I totally agree with what you said. Elaine Bredehoft only proved she’s like her client and can’t take accountability for anything
Thank you. AH did NOT win, The Sun won. And the judge brought up the fact that she DONATED her divorce settlement was put forward.. I doubt Elaine will accept a “pledge” for her legal fees.
"Johnny hadn't smiled like this for six years" makes me tear up. I heard it three times this morning and I teared up every time. It really resonates with me. I know from personal experience how it feels to be wronged and ousted, and fall from the top of the world so to say. The burden is there, no matter what you do. And you can never experience true joy.
I find Johnny's reaction further proves his innocence.
I teared up too ♥️
Heresay
I also share this with u, he's truly a very blessed, gifted n special man. Thank u for ur loyalty to him. God bless*
This is why, cases like this are so IMPORTANT! Thank God Mr. Depp has the resources to do so, despite the fact, they went thru most of his life and bought out stuff that most of us would like to keep private! But it was necessary, which I believe created more EMPATHY to his case!
I teared Up too.
Congratulations to Camille on being made a partner, well deserved.
Definitely earned that! Made her career with this case I'd imagine.
Here's the best part: Elaine apparently works in that jurisdiction in VA and would most likely, in the course of her work, face Judge Penny again. Casting aspersions on the judge, the jury, the Virginia judicial system is a great career move for Elaine.
Hopefully she'll be disbarred. An utter disgrace of a lawyer.
That is good to hear!
Her law firm is definitely going to push her to retirement. They cant afford such a liability
She is working her way out of a job, for sure. At least, less people willing to take her as a lawyer.
Ms Bredehoft's post-trial interview comments were truly bizarre coming from an experienced attorney.
I thought Elaine had such nerve accusing the Jury of looking up the case during their week long break. It seemed to me if anyone had been doing that it was AH's side, given that post break she managed to (badly) address every one of the points social media had pointed out regarding her previous time on the stand.
Yep, totally unpromted from Amber adding more info that was pointed out by social media. At least Depp side also used that to their advantage by Mr.Morgan and the trailer park manager.
@@raymreed you do know that the judge says every day, every break "don't do any outside research" meaning that judge, jury, witnesses, especially while under oath, amber, Johnny and attorneys are not allowed to go on social media and form a change of opinion. It's why some of the witnesses were dismissed and testimonies we're striken. It's why eve Barlow was barred
Amber saw on social media how Milani and everyone was saying that the make up Elaine showed the court in opening statements didn't exist, so she changed it to "obviously not THIS one." Why she's saying how people are bullying her, a random comment of microwaving her baby stolen from someone else's story.
Well spotted. Looking back at it,Elaine deffo addressed points widely publicised after that break
I think a lot of what they did after the break would have had them scratching their heads because don't think they did.
Class and professionalism from Ben, Camille and the entire team from the start. Well done guys! You should be allowed to celebrate you did an amazing job. Congrats to Camille!! A true role model for all!! 🥰
Your petition to appeal the UK judgement just reached its first target of 50,000 signatories. Congratulations.
How can I sign this petition?
What does this mean?
@@lildebra7941 It’s my understanding that there’s an active petition to appeal the UK just against Johnny Depp. Since I agree, I would love to sign this petition. But I don’t know how?🙄
@@lildebra7941 it’s a petition to re-open the Depp vs NGN case. The right to appeal was not granted and frankly it’s very unlikely to be re-opened but there is absolutely no harm in signing the petition just in case! Also the black belt barrister has done another video explaining his reasoning in full.
@@sonjamurphy3505 The petition link is on the description of this video.
Dr. Shannon Curry accurately predicted every single personality disorder Amber Heard demonstrated whenever she was on the witness stand.
Dr Curry could add Elaine to that list too!!! AH is a psychopath for sure but I dunno why Elaine's doing this. She was terrible at her job and should be disbarred.
Really shows the relative skills between the expert witnesses.
I think many people will be analysing the court proceedings for years to come for signs of personality disorders and body language
Dr. Curry predicted nothing, she evaluated Amber and knew EVERYTHING about her, even as she tried to lie on test taken to manipulate results. It may have looked like she predicted Amber's antics, but in reality she just exposed Amber for what her psychological makeup was at that point of time. (Frighteningly, so.)
I would never want to be in front of that woman, and I have no criminal record. I say that, because unlike Dawn Hughes, I don't think Dr. Curry would miss her marks in analysis. It would suck if there was some aspect of me as a result of her findings I don't like. LOL What can you say to her? "You got me f-cked up. You don't know me." On the contrary, a psychologist, proud of the prowess her field of work provides would know you as if they were reading an open book.
Did you notice Dr Hughes sitting next to Whitney for Amber's counter rebuttal? After Camille exposes her lies 10 minutes later she's gone. I think that was the moment where Dr Hughes regretted her part in the trial.
A much more professional approach with Camille and Ben, what a contrast to Elaine's interviews.
Elaine made an ass of herself for her “15” minutes of fame. She accused a witness of doing the same thing she is doing. And she lies like Amber does. Loved when she was confronted with her lies on live tv!
Much respect to Ben Chew and Camille Vasquez! Congratulations to Miss Vasquez for her much deserved promotion!
Wasn't 15 minutes of fame, She got the short straw in the office, and Amber's PR squad are in full gaslighting mode.
Exactly the point I made!!!! Shes gonna end up ruining her own career if she doesn't stop!
And after leaking the info about the UK trial to the jury during her closing statement!
She is literally saying what nearly all the media (except FOX) has been saying for more than a week before the verdict. That is the really disturbing part. If cameras were not allowed in the court we would not know the truth.
Thats why the mirror is so important. Elaine look in it you were talking to yourself of 15 min. Of fame
I love these two , they polite and honest , ty for sharing this .
This is such a good point. I think not admitting any faults is why Amber could go on and on about the alleged horrible things that Johnny did to her, but the jury could see that Amber was merely trying to push their emotional buttons and they weren't having it. Thanks!
Truly, as an outside "Juror," NO WAY did she, nor could she push my emotional button, because there was NO TRUE MEANING to her words, EVERYTHING, just rang so FAKE!
and let it be known that I was NEVER a Fan of Mr. Depp's, Amber made me his Supporter, after listening to TAPES, and watching her on the Stand! Amber truly has DUAL personalities, she is DANGEROUS, and I truly FEAR for her DAUGHTER! I PRAY, someone in her family is keeping a close eye on how she treats her daughter!
@@rebeccajohnson8579 Yes, people kept trying to find where she was stealing her stories from because they sounded so contrived. I think you have a valid concern for her daughter. There's that video of Whitney's friend checking her for bruises from Amber along with all the audio recordings with Johnny.
Brilliant team, I watched the whole trial. Thank you for getting justice for Johnny, peace be with him.
Such contrast to the earlier interviews we saw with Team Heard. Sk so Nice to see credit being given to the amazing jury who gave up so much of their time, also the fact that they believed they took their oath seriously, hearing the case and all the evidence which far exceeded what was bought into the U.K. trial which as they say was a different trial anyway.. it wasn’t against Amber ! The evidence they both bought into this most recent trial gave them an equal chance. It was unanimously judged by a jury in Johnnys Favor! What a great interview, both Camille and Ben very tactful, fair and no taunting of anyone! Hats off! Congratulations to Camille x
Heard wasn't even a party to the UK trial!
It´s so simple and effortless when you´re talking about the facts and the truth, isn´t it... These two people, and the rest of the team, are a merit to their profession.
Very classy interview by Camille Vasquez and Ben Chew. About the case and not some bigger issue! Elaine’s interview accusing the jury of being influenced by social media is kind of ridiculous considering her team brought a social media expert to testify about all the negative hashtags exposing the jury themselves! Love your videos!
What's so funny is that this Case MADE the Public Jury and Opinions since it was televised! Otherwise, HOW could we come to the SAME VERDICT that the Jurors did? As WE LISTENED TO THE SAME EVIDENCE, so Elaine, what's your issue, again?
Exactly!
@@rebeccajohnson8579 that she lost! Because her client lies! That UK trial which was completely different gave her a false sense of righteousness that just isn’t reality with a client who’s lying!
@@mystifeyed i dont even think Elaine knows what the UK trial was about ?
@@rosean374 , I read she was there with Amber🤷♀️. Anyways, Elaine, as Amber's lawyer should know better
They certainly came off way more professional and didn't do an Elaine. 💜
Thank you so much for addressing the toll that lawsuits can take on the participants I am a survivor of a seven year legal wrangle over an estate and discovered after 7 years that I had fourth stage bladder cancer. I dropped the legal fight to concentrate on my health. And two rounds of chemotherapy and one immunotherapy round later I was given the yellow light of remission. The cost of justice is not counted in pounds and dollars alone. Again my thanks for illuminating this often ignored element of seeking redress under the law.
🙏
When I walked away from my 7 1/2 year marriage I fled with my two daughters and the clothes on my back. I also payed for my lawyer who was quite surprised since when I asked him to represent me I didn't have a job! My first paycheck I used to pay him and he told me even though he was worried about how I would fare with my two very young children he felt proud of the fact I proved him wrong. He went on to remarry and ended putting her in the hospital on more than one occasion.
Style, professionalism and class from both! Well done and thank you
A very good and valid point regarding the jury influenced by the social media as they would then see the details of the UK trial and thus Elaine's own logic defeats her point.
How true. Lawyers have been making this claim in highly publicized trials long before internet. Yet Amber's lawyers didn't seem to mind all the press they got and were getting till the trial fell apart. The press was on her side since she had tmz show up at her restraining order hearing and they all are still on her side(except FOX). If there were no cameras in the court no one would no the truth.
I don't agree ...if it is to say that the jury was influenced then it means they went beyond the cursory look at the social media. And if so why should they wouldn't go in deeper? So it is better not to speculate like Elaine did.
Didn’t see the interview, so thanks for the review.
BTW, your re-open Johnny Depp UK petition which was about 8,000 signatories 2 days ago is now over 50,000. Next target 70,000. Come on people. Let’s see if we can hit that today or tomorrow. Let’s shoot for 100,000 signatures by the end of the weekend. Tell everyone you can.
Agree ... I wonder if people feel they have to donate $ in order to sign? .. Times been hard for alot of people with this covid.
No more blaming, accusing or complaining, just facts and dignity. Great lawyers.
Thank you Barrister for all you are doing to help us understand what happened in the UK case, and for helping trying to get JD an appeal in the UK case because he didn't get a fair trial there. Just like you said JD didn't sue AH in the UK, he sued the Sun Newspaper; therefore, the UK case should not have anything to do with the trial here in the United States.
AH & her team (especially her girlfriend Eve Barlow) were on social media from minute one! The makeup backtrack, copying JDs clothes, the changing of the PR team and on & on & on. People with no morals truly believe other have none as well.
Yup, total hypocrites, not to mention clinically insane!
In all the discussion on the influence of social media, that's probably the most astute observation! Team AH tried to game the system and failed.
Since both JD and AH were parties in this case they weren’t restricted from social media. But I agree it is hypocritical to blame social media for persuading the jury when it was blatantly obvious that AH or her team had been on social media during the week off and then began to tailor their responses to social media commentary. It’s ridiculous.
The cloths copying was as ridiculous as it was sick. It shows how women feel they can get away with anything when dealing with men cause the courts (at least divorce and child) are completely on their side. As is the government and the media. She didn't feel she had to prove anything or work at being on the stand and that she could openly mock the court and Johnny in front of the jury. That says a lot about the double standard men have to deal with.
You make a very good point about Elaine's claim that Jury must have researched and must have been swayed by their research - if she is right then her claim that she "was not allowed to present some evidence" falls flat for as per her own claim jury must have become aware of this "persuasive" evidence during their alleged research!
Good point
They have so much class. Not gloating about the win. Just stating the facts . Not once they pointed fingers on her lawyers. This is called professionalism. They could have said lot of stuff about her and her lawyers . RESPECT . 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Elaine's a shit show. She contradicts herself and is NOT the person I would ever want speaking on my behalf IMHO!
4 points:
1. Elaine claims she had 'overwhelming evidence' proving AHs case, then also 'not enough evidence' because of the UK trial?? Pick a lane, Elaine...😵💫
2. SHE didn't win the UK trial. AMBER didn't win the UK trial. The Sun did. It's not apples to apples. Amber was a witness, not a defendant so a lot of evidence that she should have provided (her texts, her recordings proving she's a hardcore abuser) didn't have to be put into discovery/evidence. Elaine should be careful what she says AND be careful what she asks for! 🙀
3. To blame the jury for searching social media during the 2 week break is such a joke! Amber was an acting witness during the break and NOT allowed to search social media OR confer with her lawyers, yet she came back with rebuttals on every little thing that was being said about her online!!! 😵 That's some pot and kettle shit if you ask me.
4. Mainstream media is a big problem here. You can tell who watched the case and who didn't based on what they report. Amber lost her own case by claiming ridiculous assault! If she didn't lie and exaggerate so much, she may have had a fair shot, but she was demolished! No question about it! And 99.5% of people who actually watched sides with Johnny! Fan or not!
Bonus: Ben Chew's legal team is top notch. Professional AF and worth every penny. Such a contrast between both sides. They refuse to stoop to Amber's teams level and the world respects them for it! 💕
They made the same claim before internet. They could have read the papers watched the news or talk to people who did. If you watched a significant amount of the trial it would be easy to see why the verdict was what it was. I'm sure Johnny's side was not allowed to present all their evidence. There are legal reasons why. And you're right about them seeing this persuasive evidence. Elaine's strategy is play to the liberal media and hope to get judges that can't define what a woman is on the appeal.
@@CrystalCat24 On Point . Good points I was thinking on same lines u represented it so well.I would love it if all us note n mention , The anchor was so Biased , rehearsed and Sneaky on purpose With the agenda to prove them guilty or to want o make new spectators doubt team Depp n Jury n judge through the ugly questions . Screw u MSM , ur walking on Ambers footsteps of self destruction , So stop accepting Bribe from the Dear Richie Rich Mollusk ...
What a class act! A reflection of their client. Sadly, we see the same reflection in the other side - grabby and over-acting. I think AH's team went I with the expectation of an easy win, because "they" won in the UK. Except the UK case wasn't "them" vs JD, but Sun vs JD. In any event, justice was truly served.
I subscribed a week ago & literally this video is proof I made a brilliant decision.
Thank you Triple B.
With respect from a new follower from the west coast of the states.
Thank you 🙏🏼
I love how they actually answer the questions unlike Elaine, who was deflecting all the time, sticking to her sucky script
In my opinion, a lawyer that does not believe in the system of justice, should not be a lawyer and (this is harsh) and should be disbarred for tainting the courts, the legal system and the jurors.
Totally agree with you. Trash is as trash does and it should be taken out!
A most excellent dissection of Jonny Depps legal teams interview. I also particularly like your personal take on your own reasons why you entered your occupation (at around 7min.20secs).
I have found myself against what I believe a major injustice several years ago but was simply too old and tired to do what you did Mr Smith. Hats off to you sir for getting to where you are now. Love your channel and loved the Depp v Heard case and so thrilled that man got the justice he deserved
Thank you this was so respectful compared to AH lawyers angry interviews. I appreciate you sharing this with respectful comments demonstrating integrity. Johnny’s lawyers demonstrated integrity and respect for the law and the process
Amber’s lawyer is right! There was pertinent evidence that was excluded. Because, had the jury been allowed to hear the audio where she admits to Jerry Judge that SHE started a physical fight, severed JD’s finger tip; where she is stomping the floor in heels with NO CONCERN for her cut 🦶🏻🙄; and she is crying because she doesn’t want to leave Johnny’s side as she claims he needs her; that evidence alone would have helped the jury return a verdict in 2 seconds in Johnny’s favor.
Had that evidence been allowed the jury would have determined that all of Amber’s claims are a proven hoax and Waldman’s claims would have been found legitimate as yo who she is.
This should be seen and TikTok and Twitter.
I didn’t know about this? Why wasn’t it allowed to be played in court?
@@Itsshxn, because one of the persons present at that moment pass away. I think was one of Johnny's security guard
@@Itsshxn I saw a comment that audio could only have JD and AH on it. Another person mentioned JJ was deceased ... so sadly could not be used. Not sure if appeal by BBB goes through if they can use it there to clear JD name.
Evidence that didn't come in actually would have bolstered Johnny's case - ie the conversation with Dr Kipper after the finger, when they were looking for it and Amber said she didn't mean to do it. I think it's possibly something to do with Jerry Judge having died and being in the clip - I may be wrong on that part as to why it wasnt admitted - but that would have actually boosted Johnny's case rather the other way round, like Amber's side allege.
I saw a comment as well ... it said audio could only have JD and AH on it. However, not sure if it could be used in UK if a appeal happens.
@@KimA67. I'm not sure a uk appeal can happen. It's already been refused - the black belt barrister goes into it. I've not had chance to listen fully yet though.
I actually think when the jury went home and even over that long break, they just wanted a break from the trial and not research it in anyway cos it was a damn long trial, any human being would just want a mental break from it all. That's just my thoughts
So cool to discover new channels such as yours through following the Depp/Heard ordeal for the past 3 years. I learned of you through your Popcorn planet interview and as a Canadian with a British parent, I look forward to learning and understanding more of the UK legal system!
very classy, heart felt thoughtful comments, no sensationalism or silliness, he had a great team
Respect and gratitude.
Thank you for talking about how stressful and all-consuming going through legal proceedings can be. I had a relatively minor issue that was resolved by an arbitration board instead of a courtroom, but it took months and it was all I could think about a lot of that time. I don't wish it on anyone. That's why I can relate a bit to Johnny's statement of getting his life back.
My sister was recently a juror on a murder trial. She came home and watched no news, followed no social media and the family did not ask her questions. We all knew how it works and greatly respected that! I am stunned that Heard’s lawyer is stating that, and again, with no evidence. I heard she was considered a good lawyer. She came across as one of the low level, ambulance chasing lawyers. She should have controlled her questioning better, she wasted precious time, she should have grilled Amber in the beginning better so she could fight for her as well as coached and recoached Amber how to behave in the courtroom. Pretending to right notes and pass blank sheets of paper to her lawyers was stupid. She didn’t realize we know how to zoom in to her supposed note taking? I won’t even start on her paid “expert” witnesses. OMG! Didn’t Elaine even interview them?
Had the jury known about the UK trial, they would have also known that:
UK Judge’s son works for the owner of the paper that was being sued!!! And is friends with Elon Musk who was her boyfriend at the time and her now baby daddy. And his wife was friends with Amber’s UK trial Attny. So that trial made it clear how easy it is to buy their trial courts.
In the US, a judge with those personal connections to the defendant would recused himself for obvious reasons which rendered a UK court decision blatantly flouting fairness, impartiality, justice and integrity.
Not good for Amber at the end of the day. Amber was lucky that evidence was suppressed.
Daniel, thank you for sharing this information with us, really appreciate. I think this trial has shown the whole world that Johnny Depp was wrongfully discriminated against by the media and Amber Heard' has been seen in a true light for what she is. Thank goodness the whole truth came out and the jury saw through Amber Heard's smoke screen 👏. It must be big relief for Johnny and his legal team. I just hope Amber learns from this case.
Johnny's lawyers were very good at portraying the laws of the USA, Ambers lawyers should themselves be facing a trial for having a go at the jury. I myself have been on a long case in court its not fun, but we all swore not to read papers or research evidence online and certainly do not watch new programs as they might mention the case. We stuck wholly to the evidence provided both for and against the accused. Its not fun to have to sit on a jury and I feel for the jury on this trial considering AH's lawyers are hitting out at them without any evidence whatsoever.
Excellent lawyers! They spoke the truth in a respectful and professional manner. The evidence in this case was overwhelmingly in Johnny’s favor and that’s all there is to it.
To have AH’s lawyer go out there and say the jury is this and the judge is that, showed they are just like their client and don’t take accountability for anything.
Well done mr Ben and Camille, very professional legal team 👏 the jury and all planet see the truth, congratulations 👏 to them very positive and fare verdict.
Thank BlackBeltBarrister for explaining the differences in the UK trial and explaining how the process of how the law worked in the UK regarding the trial. I have learned so much from your channel. The US handles these types of cases so differently then in the UK and I find the UK law system interesting. Again, thank you for explaining the differences (to me and others who live in the US). Also, I've signed your petition and I thank you for that as well.
00
Elaine's interview was very difficult to watch. She was throwing blame around like confetti. Amber and her have a lot in common. Now this is an excellent example of how you should conduct yourself in an interview. A big congratulations to Camille for making partner. She totally deserves it.
Truly releaved to see JD get his life back.
Only one question remains:
"Why has Amber not been charged with perjury ?
Appreciate so many professionals are sharing thier takes. And seeing those actually in action, so much better having full context (the trial. )
Be careful. With lawyers like this we are going to start have respect for lawyers/barristers.
Having his life back is the whole point of going for defamation claim. This is the mission for Ben’s team. The team never deviated from it, before, during, and post trial.
Thank you for putting that on was nice to see two very professional people answering the questions
I didn't expect to be sobbing from this video. The quote about not seeing johnny smile like that for six years did it. I wish I could see that justice and move on with my life, but it didn't happen, and he's dead now. There will always be that deep black memory that the system failed to charge him with all those crimes, because the police daren't stare into the abyss back then. I don't blame that police officer, he quit the job a few days later. My abuser only got two years. It should've been so much longer.
I don't need support or sympathy, please don't reply. Just venting. It's been an emotional couple of decades already, seeing replies will just make it worse. All I want is for this to be a warning, if you are out there wondering if you should get justice, don't become me: TELL THE POLICE EVERYTHING. The best thing I did was tell them, god knows what I'd feel like now if I didn't.
They always sound as if it was a competition. JD won because he DIDNT do it. As for JD carrying the wieght of future cases, not his responsibility. The evidence that did get put the jury it was all fake.
Wow, well said!
I love Johnny team as they work hard for this trial with compassion and dedication is truly all about the truth.
Finally Johhny's life is back.......
You know, BBB, there's professionalism and then there is NO professionalism, and the difference between Johnny's lawyers and Elaine is that Elaine is acting like some of those ambulance chaser lawyers--a helter skelter lawyer and very uncouth; (you notice I don't mention the other AH lawyers because they are being discreet and smart). I did like J. Benjamin Rottenborn. I think he should move over to Ben Chews' firm! I think questioning the jurors' decision and blaming it on social media is ludicrous. The evidence abounded against AH. Pure and simple!
The world watched it play out. Evidence and no evidence on AH side. Justice served thankfully for JD
@@KimA67. Amen!
YES!!!!! Thanks for getting on this quick time....
Your content is galaxies more refined, better informed than many others I'm seeing. What a better experience, here. Thx much.
The UK trial was a JOKE. I'm so glad this case was televised, otherwise we would have never known what type of unstable psycho we were dealing with. Justice was served for Johnny!!!
Respect for the process, and for the Court. This is so important. I'm glad to see that in this case, as in many others, this still holds true. We may be living in the age of social media, and the age of "situation ethics" (no ethics at all, in my view), but we sell ourselves short,
by assuming that everyone can be easily corrupted. The concept of right and wrong, although under attack, is still embedded in our common traditions, in both the U.K. and the U.S. If ever those boundaries are breached in a substantial way, our civilization will rapidly
fall apart.
It was excellent to see both Vasquez and Chew coming out together. This interview shows unity, professionalism, and credibility not exactly seen with AH’s team. But then again, the team reflects the chaos of the client, so they can’t really be blamed. AH would be a nightmare of a client.
2 points: 1) when I was a child my mom was in a horrible car accident where someone ran into her and she hit the person in front of her. It was the hit and run. Three of her ribs were broken, etc. She spent days in the hospital only to come home and later find police at the door at 3:00 in the morning notifying her she was being sued by the person she hit. Thankfully their insurance company settled the case but she's told me that she's never endured such an intense amount of stress. The person she hit had irreparable physical damage. Even though it was not my mom's fault she felt an immense amount of guilt. The woman couldn't and wouldn't speak to my mother. When the case was settled, a lot of that lifted.
2) What I see is such a intense sharp contrast between Amber's lawyer Elaine going around and essentially blaming everyone else and not taking any responsibility for her client and where she may have gone wrong and Johnny's lawyers essentially staying classy, not throwing out insults and just speaking factually and logically. These are professional lawyers.
I am really looking forward to your opinion as a fellow Brit.
Still highlights to me how scary the UK court system can be. Without going into great detail something so similar happened at a case I was witness to. The jury was abandoned on the day before it started on the day and the trial adjourned to bring in a particular corrupt judge (a judge who's been publicly reprimanded by the British legal system in national newspapers for being corrupt with cases of this particular nature). Not only did I and others witness a viscous assault, it was filmed and presented in court. The aggressor was found NOT GUILTY despite the barrister jumping in to remind the judge that it was caught on film after he'd made his decision. The victim was utterly destroyed and witnesses left completely disgusted to be living with a clearly bent legal system. Just horrible. If that had been me that had been in the victims shoes I would have dedicated my life to bring that bent judge down.
Let's face the FACTS here! This trial was TELEVISED, therefore, all who watched, LISTENED to all the EVIDENCE and VIDEOS'S that was allowed in this case!
Those of us who listened to the trial, came out with the SAME CONCLUSION/VERDICT that the Jury came too! In my eyes, all whom watched was also PART of that Jury, although we NOT appointed as one of the Jurors, but 95% of us came to the same verdict!
Many of us was not that familiar with Mr. Depp, other than he is an actor, but after listening to the trial and the evidence permitted, this is what made me become a SUPPORTER, because I felt the harm and humiliation he suffered from all the LIES this evil and selfish person made up and leaked to the media on him!
My greatest hope is that she and ALL who LIED UNDER OATH receives jail time, probation and made to do Community Service for the damage, harm & hurt they caused to Mr. Depp!
If not, then others will continue to LIE, causing damage & harm to others, knowing NOTHING will be done to them, or just a slap on the wrist, if that!
That is my point all along - we were all part of the jury. Anyone in favor of Amber could not have watched the trial.
Unfortunately this trial was not a criminal trial it was a civil trial for damages, which means no jail time.
@@ileanahernandez1709 Honestly, even when one LIES Under Oath?
Very classy, professional and respectful, unlike Heard and her legal team, whom appear rude and impertinent! Excellent video, again class and professionalism at its finest. 🌹
Ben and Camile are true Stars...There whole team were brilliant and so on top of this Case...Amber Herd seems like an extremely difficult person to deal with, she couldn't keep her story straight because of the continuous lies..The Jury saw right through them, thankfully...This Case was handled so professionally by Johnny's team of Attorney's and didn't let Amber away with spinning her narrative in a different direction....Thankyou and regards from Ireland 🇮🇪
Great analysis of the interview. I started following you after seeing you on Legalbytes. I’ll continue to watch your content
I just found your channel from popcorn planet really glad I did and am subscribed. Love from Kansas ❤️💜
Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge and passion with your subscribers and other youtubers. I've learned much from your careful explanations of the differences between the UK and Virginia trials, and this has helped me reason through one of Bredehoft's arguments for appeal.
BBBarrister - you are brilliant. I studied law in 1965-68 and I’ve kept up a working interest where necessary for my business, and with regard to Land Law. I followed the detailed process of evidence in the Depp v Heard case, and I’m following your comments as each point arises subsequent to the verdict. Your explanations of the differences between English Law and the law of the Courts in Virginia are great and really interesting. Thanks - I find it hugely interesting and I find your observations so good.
Regards & Respect
Mike D, Devon, England
I always thought that the UK judgement was incompetent, so I'm glad that this US verdict had made it obvious.
It certainly brings into question the quality of British justice which I have long though of as second rate - the judiciary seems to be free to rely on their own political bias in coming to a conclusion.
While the UK judgement was disappointing, and well deserves to be reviewed (not least the potential partiality of the judge), as BBB stated it was a completely different beast: different defendant, different disclosure, no jury. Let's face it, it was AH who was one of her own worst enemies in Virginia, and she didn't get to do that in the UK.
Hear hear!
Thank you for your videos. I find them very good. Glad I found you through Popcorned Planet 💗🙏
I'm just an ordinary Joe who, many years ago, won an appeal in the High Court against a judgement made against me at a local magistrates' court. It was a piffling matter, as compared to what Johnny Depp faced in his UK trial, but that makes it all the more vital that he's granted an appeal in the UK as soon as possible. Quite amusingly, looking back on my own case, I'd thought to myself at the time, 'How can this judge even come to a decision, he looks to me as if he's half asleep !' Frankly, I was amazed at his summing up, he'd missed absolutely nothing, and furthermore I felt like bursting into song at his castigation of the magistrates who'd unlawfully tried to make an example of my young self for their own aggrandisement. We all know the type, funny handshake egotistical planks !
The beaks in Ireland are just as bad
Don't know if I'd appeal now if I was Johnny. With the majority of the media seemingly employed by the feminist movement. It is hard to imagine anything coming out in the trial making him look any better, but any and every little thing will be twisted and turned against him. They are even saying his act of defense is a form of abuse against Amber and all victims. I guess in our society all men who have a bad go of it in marriage are just supposed to shoot themselves in the head for the betterment of all women. Plus I don't see the UK allowing an American actor win a lawsuit against one of their papers. Do you?
@@michaelwaninger3155 Most people with a few brain cells in the UK and Ireland hate the Scum (sorry, Sun!) AH would be a good expert witness on how effective it is as toilet paper coz that's all its suitable for.
💯 agree. In my case when I wish to really focus on what's being said, l like to close my eyes from all visual distractions and hone in on the words. If closing my eyes will appear rude, l will zone out on everything else. I will do this once I have gained an overall sense of the visuals involved. For a juror l believe this is a great tactic as there are so many visual distractions in court, that you can miss the words. Another way of doing this is to write down as much as you can of everything you hear. We all have different ways we use to focus in. As a teacher l have often found that a student who is not looking at me continuous has retained more. A teacher's face, mannerisms, and clothing can be distracting. Unfortunate these students are usually accused of daydreaming. It's very easy to quickly find out if that's the case, and usually they have an underlying mental health issue, or it's been one of those days, when I have not been engaging enough.
You can see Mr. Chew kindness. He is caring, professional and classy. Sooo humble too❤️❤️😀😀❤️❤️❤️
Great channel and commentary, thank you!👏
Congratulations Camille! Thank you both for your awesome team!
I also teared up. I'm so happy that he can go on with his life..Johnny is a good man. He does so many good things for those in need like visiting children hospital as Jack Sparrow as a example. I believed him from the get go.....❤️❤️❤️
Thanks for doing this for us all
Enjoying your breakdown! Good work!
Respect and gratitude
YOU ARE SUPER AWESOME KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK BROTHER WE NEED MORE PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO STAND FOR THE REAL TRUTH
Thanks for the breakdown, & the explanations concerning all the legal stuff
People like you are restoring my faith in the justice system...
Amber Heard said she was not a perfect human being, it seems that is just a virtue signal compared with the denial even to her own behaviour in court vs Depp being candor of his issues. Which I think were made worse around Heard.
The difference in the Lawyers are huge, one team act like professionals, organised, direct, prepared, dignified in the media (Depps) the other like sore losers (Heard's) without dignity, lack of respect for the judge, the jury and evidence given, attempting to cast doubt and offend DV victims,many who are angered by Ms Heard.
I mean can’t say I can expect much from a team who was willing to falsify evidence to get their win. Like how rottenborn photoshopped Johnny’s picture to make it look like he got bruised from headbutting amber and also misrepresented texts that were written to him, as ones he wrote. They’re pretty awful people I’d have to say
@@BreakofDawn the photos, really did anyone believe they matched her statements. Those rings would have done a lot more damage, fists alone would.
Is there anyone that believed that one of the photos was not edited with the contrast?
I appreciated your videos about the UK contrast so I had a background when listening to this video.
Thank you for your input on the U.S. trial. Petition signed!
Excellent as usual. Thank you
Nice to see a UK Lawyer’s, barrister’s, point of view on trial lawyers interviews here in the states. Nice to see A continuity of opinions on the difference between the UK trial and here in the states
Very well spoken by Ben and Camille. Elaine was doing what a lot of the MeToo lot do, claiming "there is tons of evidence!" But they never show it, never release it, but after a court case, that doesn't work. In court, you bring all of your evidence to the table, and the only evidence that is thrown out is either blatantly false or entirely irrelevant. Any evidence that would have "changed the outcome" that was "suppressed" was probably falsified on AH's side. Good thing she doesn't have the money to file the appeal. Let her deal with the consequences of her actions.
Exactly ... well said.
Great analysis and insights
Great video! Didn't realize the JD's lawyers went for an interview lol
Thank you, I really love to watch your opinion and the knowledge you have.
Good morning!!
Camille Vasques is Beautiful, Brilliant and a Breath of fresh air! Thank you for helping Johnny Depp get his life back and congratulations becoming a Partner... well deserved!
Another fantastic video thank you 🙏