Jon Stewart DISMANTLES Right Wing Grifter On His Show | Hasanabi reacts
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Jon Stewart goes after a right wing senator, who thinks everyone should have guns.
Edited by: / hasanabifix
Support:
► Subscribe: bit.ly/Sub2Has...
► Help me become more independent by joining the HasanAbi Fix universe and get access to exclusive perks: bit.ly/team-ha...
► Donation: www.paypal.com...
► Buy me Coffee: www.buymeacoff...
#hasanabi #hasanpiker #reacts #twitch #jonstewart #twitter #guncontrol
Links:
► www.cato.org/b...
► www.npr.org/20...
► reason.com/202...
Tags: hasanabi, hasan piker, hasanthehun, hasanabi reacts, hasan, jon stewart gun control, jon stewart guns, hasanabi gun control, hasan guns, hasan gun violence, hasanabi gun violence, hasanabi shooting, jon stewart shooting, hasan gun debate, hasanabi gun debate, jon stewart gun debate
![Yailin La Mas Viral, @kreizyk.official - Dale 2 (Remix) [Video Oficial]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JaYHBzgqz94/mqdefault.jpg)
If you enjoyed this video, please subscribe, like and comment for the Almighty Algo! ❤
Help me become more independent by joining the HasanAbi Fix Universe: bit.ly/team-hasanabifix
Hasan, please give me your take; American partisanship seems to be prioritized over the actual policies and legitimate arguments in our discourse, so could we argue that the American dialogue itself has been radicalized?
Just a bit of feedback, I found the music rly distracting. If it wasn’t you that added it please disregard!
Let’s just appreciate that when it comes to guns and gun violence we need to look at the problems those people are facing.
This logic is never to be utilized in the case of black and brown communities.
Republicans love context when they want to.
He's not blaming fatherlessness, he's blaming women....
He doesn't want women getting divorces
If I push you off a cliff, it's your fault for falling.
.........but he does believe in women getting pregnant and having babies!
I’m so glad you said this 👏👏👏
No, he's blaming blacks. The conservative presumption is that blacks have fatherless homes.
Or have jobs or do anything other than becoming a baby factory.
Any chronic pain patient who had or still has prescription medication is tracked more than most criminals. There are two electronic tracking systems we are in. We have to sign contracts and get urine screens/pill counts regularly and also on demand. You can be dismissed from care without violating any rules without recourse leaving millions without treatment of any kind from any doctor. Now even hospitals are refusing to use opioid medication for surgery during and after, let that sink in, refusing to treat the pain of terminally ill patients.
I agree but have nothing to contribute. The stigma is insane and the pain is real.
All thanks to the spawns of Satan at Purdue.
Lol, I was just in the hospital recently and they gave me morphine and actually asked me if I was okay with it. Where do you get your "facts"?
@@djentrifried Calm down, they made it very clear that this wasn’t a universal phenomenon, and that people with chronic pain and terminal illnesses were the ones being targeted, not one-time surgery outpatients.
@djentrifried. Wow! I'm really glad that you aren't a chronic pain patient. How do I know that you're not one? Because you are able to LOL about the subject of chronic pain management. I pray that you never become one.
This guy is the person who is the threat. Jon’s got him😂
I think Jon is really good at arguing because he doesn't get distracted, and he doesn't feel like he needs to state his own opinions for the record - he keeps the focus on the best, clearest argument he can make, and doesn't allow the guy he's debating to weasel out of the conclusion. There are SO many of these "professional" debater types who let their opponent completely get away with changing the subject or gets wound up having to re-re-re-re-state their own views because they're desperate to not seem insufficiently leftist or too leftist. Focus on the goddamned argument your opponent is making, because you KNOW it's BS and will fall apart.
Yep it is the same strategy I use except he is even more experienced.
If you wanted to build the dream team of logical talkers. Who have a the ability to see right through people. You get Jon Stewart and Howard Stern together.
Long story short- hes a Sagittarius haha
Well put, I agree
“That’s not a subjective opinion, that’s dead people.” I’ve been screaming this since the start of Covid
unfortunately some people have a really hard time grasping the concept of something they can not directly see
So in family court the judge refused to honor that covid was a good reason to keep my daughter out of school in 2020 when legally she was only required to be there the last 6 weeks. We had a super high risk grandbaby as well. My half brother's father worked as a bailiff in that courthouse for over 30 years. He was on the sheriff's softball team, and was MUCH loved and respected. he died of covid. The judge knew him well. Didn't say so. The judge couldn't care less. He held it against me anyway. No CPS or anything mind you. Just my ex getting out of jail for the umpteenth time wanting more visitation. Then there was the moment I went into the sheriff's department for being served for that hearing. That sheriff told me yeah. We're not doing masks anymore. Was real excited. Stores were still doing it mind you. All other gov was mainly by zoom. There were still about 700 deaths a day in our state and people were just starting vacation. Schools still had them... I asked if he knew Butch. He was like oh! Yeah! Really great guy!! Said who my half brother was. He said he knew my-half brother too, who also played on the softball team. He said he was so sorry for his loss. He said he felt terrible for Butch's wife as well. Said I didn't know her well. I said you know how he died right? He said yeah. He was somber, and congenial after. It's crazy. Even when they see it, it's somehow a statistic! Waukesha, WiI
@@JamieDoe472 That is mind numbing. Abhorrent.
@@JamieDoe472 I suppose it can all be chalked up to the "it could never happen to me" mindset, or optimism bias. People see statistics and just never think about themselves being a part of that statistic because they somehow think they're special. It sounds like narcissism, but it's really just human nature. Unfortunately, I was also a victim of this kind of mindset. Even though I tried following all the regulations when it came to COVID, I still got lazy sometimes thinking that "oh I've gotten this far, there's no way I'll get infected." So, I would just let my mask down to breath a little fresh air every now and then, and it wound up with me getting COVID not once, but TWICE. I guess it was unavoidable the second time though since I at least think I took all of the necessary precautions. Then my dad also happened to get it from me. Luckily, neither of us were at risk of serious effects since we're both healthy, active individuals.
So…the government should regulate fatherhood? And that is somehow both more achievable AND less intrusive to our freedom than say…background checks? 🤦🏽♂️
I hate conservatives complaining about Fentanyl when we aren't willing to do anything for those who become addicted to it.
Because nobody is ready to have that conversation. It's easier to just blame the individual and their "lack of self-control."
My favorite argument to have with more liberal-minded older folks is about the difference between a dependent and an addict being a permission slip.
We had a bunch of people... remove themselves from the game... after a pain doctor got "made an example of" by Mercy and they just got cut off from their scripts. Some tried to cope, some turned to the streets, and one guy went base-jumping without a chute over a bridge.
I know long-term patients who have been on the same dose for 20 years and never stepped out of line once being messed with on their scripts. Actively hurting their quality of life.
As far as I'm concerned, the government can back itself all the way outside of a Doctor's Office.
It's more politically convenient for conservatives to have an enemy. It's been that way since reefer madness. They've even created drug problems for political convenience. Check out CIA Contra redistribution program. They infected black neighborhoods with crack so they could vilify black neighborhoods for the crackheads. Republicans are pretty gd evil yo.
Like being pro-life and anti-welfare. Make babies no matter what, even poverty.
Not to mention most of the Fentanyl out there isn't coming from across the border, it's coming from American manufacturers.
They only ever take money from big pharma...
Right wing grifter: "You know what causes problem A? It's problem B that conservatives also aren't going to try to solve."
Well, in all fairness, that's because of problem C, which is caused by problem D. Eventually, you will realize that the root cause is Kevin Bacon.
They can't allow themselves to directly attack a problem head on at its source. they have to pretend it's something or someone else, attack that then pretend it was something else but never go after the root problem. They don't want govt to work so they ensure it doesn't. When there is enough distain for the govt their corporate friends can take over
Accurate.
@@DrejaAndiwhat if Kevin bacons middle name is "canadian"? What would happen?
@@pokemonfan2630Riots.
Fentanyl comes in shipping containers, not on migrants backs.
Most people don't realize that. It also comes hidden inside truck tires, batteries, etc.
@@PatrickJohner-l2j Big fake tiddies
@@yeelahowah7476everything after season 1 was mid
@@yeelahowah7476 And pet Ducks?
@@yeelahowah7476in shipping containers, meatball
Wow, Stewart absolutely eviscerated this guy. That was a masterclass in building walls around your opponent that they can’t get out of.
Jon doing comedy is more succinct and fact based than many news reporters. When he isn't doing comedy he's absolutely brutal.
I know he won't, but I want him to run for President so bad
It’s crazy how Jon just dominated that discussion. Every time that politician tried to set up a point, Jon absolutely grabbed him and slammed him into a wall of redirection. Seriously a masterclass of how to talk to an intellectually dishonest, talking point machine.
His years of experience. He's a legend for a reason.
I want someone who is fatherless because their dad died due to being a victim of gun violence to confront this guy so badly
I fit that description but I would rather leave it to the professionals.
Breaking News: Wealthy business interests love politicians who are semi-literate, intellectually challenged, relentlessly ambitious and easily manageable.
👏
For every dancing monkey, there’s an owner with coins in his cup.
You can 100% tell that he was homeschooled.
He has no talking points of his own, only others.
That’s every republican tho. They all echo the same false talking points
If you re a religious conservative then you don't depend on critical thinking...
@@everetthaddock1140 yep pretty much, they are all robots.
@@everetthaddock1140 Some of them can make a factual statement every now and again.
Not often, but a broken clock is right twice a day….soooooo🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤣😂🤣😂
@@CapnPink28 I wouldn't be surprised if those factual statements were just half truths... they either spew BS outright lies or misinformation from half truths
Other countries have broken homes. No other country has this level of mass shootings.
The guy that doesn't know the meaning of the word anecdote was homeschooled, color me shocked!
The right to bare arms was about muskets. So gives everyone muskets, as much muskets as they want. I think that's fair right?
Imagine all the fatherless kids forming up in disciplined lines in the hood, firing by rank. Cops show up and are like "GET OUT OF SQUARE FORMATION AND PUT YOUR HANDS ON THE GROUND, NOW".
It was also about trying to make the citizenry into a replacement for a standing federal army. So I'm fine with the 2nd amendment as long as the US military is entirely defunded and dismantled.
I'm Swiss, and I recently watched a video that explained that the basis for the american law is actually mimicking our law.
That is, Switzerland is known for being neutral. Military service is mandatory for men, which means they all get an AK-47 at home once they have done military training. This is not only to defend ourselves against other countries, but also to protect the nation if the government turned on us.
We have a very small active army, but the resting army is almost as big as the resting army in Germany, and we are as a country only a fraction of the size Germany is.
The point of this was to effectively give your population the ability to defend yourself against invasion, but you only join the military at age 18, and being able to shoot at an object vs. having training to systemically clean a house are two different things. So I don't think american citizens would probably not do well if the government turned on them because they don't have military training and the military in the US is strong. You also are not under the threat to be invaded whereas Switzerland has 4 surrounding countries.
What I am saying is, that the laws we made make sense for us. I we would now get to a timeline where this law was more correlated with the cause of death and not with educating average citizens about how to react when war breaks out, then we would need to change it. Our laws already change regularly, they have to, especially with a topic as dangerous as guns. Nowhere in our thinking process about why everyone has a weapon laying around in the living room is at all related to an entitlement to guns, guns are regulated, but everyone has them.
It was about putting down slave rebellions by militias constituted by the state instead of the country as a whole.
@@megamandrn001 Was it really? I've never heard that.
Thank you to the person who pointed out the pointlessness of debating conservatives. We're not going to change their minds.
What's more important is to vote for people who will actually do something about it.
Good luck trying to find enough politicians not on the NRA teet
It's not about changing their minds, it's about showing independents what's really going on.
@@Toastybees It should be about talking about what you will do for people and actually inspiring people to vote.
Many people like me are independent by default because they're sick of both parties letting them down. So it doesn't make any difference to us to show how bad one party is, or how bad one politician is. We already know.
There's no box on a ballot to vote against someone.
Whether it's independents or traditionally non-voters, if you really want them to show up and vote for you, you have to show what you will do for them.
Usually, we're just voting for someone we think is less corrupt and disgusting as other candidates, but it doesn't mean we like all they stand for or trust that they will follow through.
@@DrejaAndi Serious question for an undecided independent: is the choice really that difficult given the cards we're dealt?
@@jeebsgold If they're still undecided at this point, it seems like it is difficult for them.
And then there's non-voters who have given up a long time ago on all of them.
This is not an anecdote, it actually happened!!!😂😂😂
I legit think Donald Trump wouldn't have won in 2016 if Jon Stewart hosted the Daily Show full time through that election.
Why would you think Jon Stewart has that power and that many people watch him?
@@animalsmistakenformonsters1492 Because he does.
No. People who watch TDS weren't going to vote for Trump in the first place. I doubt even Stewart would have had that much of an effect.
@belias360 that's not the effect. It doesn't matter if they're watching the show. He doesn't let the traction stick.
"I'll be home in a sec son, just going to go get some milk.... and a gun."
Jon Stewart eats this guy’s lunch. You really need to see what he does to Arkansas Attorney General, Leslie Rutledge. Nobody does it better than Stewart, nobody!
They just keep talking in circles. Jon does an excellent job, but a good analogy to illustrate the Republican mindset is this. A village is surrounded by a mob of lions. Every now an then, a lone lion or a pair of lions will wander in and attack the village. Their thought isn't to build a better wall around the village or thin out the lions. No, their solution to the problem is for everyone in the village to grow claws and fangs so that they are on equal footing with the lions. This in their head means that everyone is safer because now they can fight back. The problem with their solution is that even though the "villagers" are armed like the lions, the villagers don't have the mindset of a lion, so they can't really fight the lions on the same level. They can't compete with the instincts of a lion. Now a good anecdote proving what I'm saying here is the Airmen that was killed in Florida after he answered the door with a gun in his hand. The cop saw a gun and shot the man even though the man didnt' threaten him with the gun, the gun was legal, and the man never pointed it at him. When the Airmen saw the cop, he wasn't alarmed. He didn't keep his guard up because he knew he hadn't given the cop a reason to shoot him. He wasn't using the instincts of a soldier in combat. He was using the instincts of a civilian, because the law of jungle isn't used inside the village. The laws of the village prevail, or so it should have. The Airmen shouldn't have lowered his guard when he saw the cop, but as Mathew McCongnay's character stated, there is only one law in the jungle. When the lions hungry, the lion eats. That was the law the cop was following.
A senator doesn't understand what an anecdote is....
We used to have standards when it came to our political leaders. Now we have people waho don't know that the particular incident that they're presenting is an anecdote.
America: Gun restrictions and subsidized healthcare are impossible and unsustainable!
Canada: exists
"Thats not a subjective opinion, thats dead people."
Im not sure how you disagree with that.
8:24 He's worried that guns are going to start to feel bad with all of the negative connotations people are putting on them. Won't somebody think about the guns?
wouldnt wanna hurt their feelings or anything
"A well regulated Militia....." It's right in the very beginning..... WELL REGULATED. Jim Jefferies nailed it in a bit..... "F*ck off, I like guns." That's the only argument they really have LOL
If this interview wasn’t so scary, real, and sad, it would be the best comedy ever. I know trumpers, very well. Here’s the thing. They all own guns. Long guns and pistols. But they don’t mind gun laws. They get their license. They register their guns. Even if they are carrying, they don’t “open” carry. They believe in safety, guns stored separately from ammo. Only the hand gun they might carry with them is loaded, and even then, not in the chamber. After a morning hunt, it’s the time to unload all ammo, count your ammo and account for it and socialize. All done before you come in the house. The men and women hunt. Not me, I can’t kill a bug, but I eat the animals. BUT, I was taught gun safety, and how to shoot. Probably couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn, but I know how it’s done. Common sense gun safety laws are a must, and no one NEEDS an assault rifle.
Forcing men to stay where they don't want to be is bound to calm things down.
satire?
@@2twokisses close: sarcasm.
There's a whole social philosophy about family problems being because of "absentee fathers", implying that the only solution is to have fathers in the home.
It's hard to argue that having a father at home isn't optimal, until you actually look and see that fathers leave because they don't want to be there, and trying to legally FORCE them to be there is more likely to result in abuse than happiness.
The people who insist that fathers must stay home are the same ones that don't want to do things that might really enable it, such as paying fathers enough to be able to support a family.
"Fathers should stay home, but we don't want to raise the minimum wage so he can actually afford to pay for them."
@@itsROMPERS... Oh I couldn't agree more. This has been going on for years. It used to be pretty straight forward...kids are better off with fathers in the home. Then they figured out fathers are not all the same. Some should not come back, some never should have been there. I know I'm not the one to make those decisions. BTW it is the same for women. Good rule...don't force someone to do what they don't want to do if you want it done right, if you want it authentic, or if you care allot about it.
@@2twokisses this is also why abortion should be legal: no kid should be born to a mom that doesn't want it.
@@itsROMPERS... 100%
Jon Stewart believes folks should be able to avoid murder to enjoy the democracy that he defends so well. That's just craaazy.
Whenever I hear "we need to stop X", I want someone to just cut right to the point: "Yeah, but you don't give a shit about that. Otherwise you'd come up with solutions."
100%
John Stewart needs to put himself on a ballot
How many shooters get their guns from their parents?
They say: If guns are taken from good guys, only bad guys will have guns.
I say: Bad guys get their guns from good guys.
hahaha i love it
My mom started homeschooling my siblings after columbine because she was terrified. We’re all very well-rounded, college-educated people with great social skills and that makes everyone surprised that we were homeschooled. We did go to a co-op for 12+ years with tons of other homeschool fams.
Not defending this guy by any means because Abek is just a curriculum lol but i wish all these wackos didn’t give homeschooling such a bad name 😭
"YOU HAVE TAKEN THE LEAD" "EXCELLENT!" "HUMILIATION!" "RrRrRAMPAGE!" "GODLIKE!" "MmMMmmMONSTER K!LL!" "THREE FRAGS LEFT!"
Goddamn, I LOATHE that background music.
Loathe is a sick band
@ronaldraygunpew i let it in and it took everything
@@mhxybeats653 @ronaldraygunpew goated band goated album Broken Vision Rhythm is an all-timer
Saw Loathe twice this year 🤘🏻
@@JohnnyGingy lucky mfer
This is what happens when talking points meet critical thinking.
John is so good at turning conservative's talking points against them.
blames fatherless troubled individuals, bans abortion. When you force someone to have the child the mother and/or father doesn't want or cant have, you're basically guaranteeing that child to grow up in a... less-than-nurturing environment at best.
Common sense isn't common and virtually doesn't exist among conservatives.
A common tactic of a grifter/disingenuous hack is constantly interrupting someone who's trying to use logic and reason to dismantle the former's argument.
Which is a trait shared by primary schoolers.
I was going to say he went to Liberty University. I was almost right.
I can't stand religious politicking or, basically, religion in general. It is sickening. They are the worst.
11:09 Jon should just honk this guy's nose and walk away
Well the interview may have been held in his home.
So he’d have been homeschooled twice!
keeeeeek
I live in Oklahoma. You can walk into a store and buy a rifle or hand guns and walk right out with them in less than 20 minutes. It's fricking insane.....
"Its not the gun, its the persn"
Well, i guess then give that dangerous person the option to move a finger and kill, instead of forcing them to at worst have to look at a knife, and have to engauge viscerally.
The problem with how a gun works is that its detaching you from the act itself in a way that not even a bow and arrow would even tho its a ranged weapon.
The fact that its less groosome, less demanding, and enabless more detachment from the act by it beeing just a flick of a finger, makes it that much more appealing to a person, especially this "person" who is blamed instead of the person and the gun.
Imagine applying this to a nuke.
" well, he blew um up, but not because the nuke was dangerous, but because he was dangerous"
And yeah, we know, the person is dangerous, but why'd ya hand um a nuke then 😂
But lets use their logic on some other issues they are against in order to support them.
So dont regulate social media, because its how the people use it.
Drugs arent dangerous
Come on, all the ki- i mean, its the people who do them.
And its not like there isnt logic to this. Again, undoubtably, the people make the decisions, but why aid um in making cirtain decisions easier.
Much better regulation, towards an eventual potencial experimental ban to see how it goes, is not really a big problem when regulation is proven to be effective, and even baning in some places.
Sure, the material conditions arent the same everywhare, but they are pretty simular.
And better regulation just makes sence.
As hasan said, its like with a drivers licence, as it is at least as dangerous as a car slaming into you ( altho maybe less or more depending on the circumstance)
Anyway, have a good day
I love seeing Jon clap some stooge cheeks lmfao
This nobody had no chance
The elevator music this channel uses is very distracting and causes me to not watch them.
I might be in tne minority but in case I'm not if figured id give some feedback
The "bullet fingerprint" thing Jon mentioned is literally something in Judge Dredd haha
It’s real now, we have the tech to do it. I think NJIT was working on it.
John Stewart owns...
John Stewart doesn't get owned.
Great video I am from Oklahoma and totally embarrassed right now. I also love Jon Stewart. This is a hard state to be a liberal in, so make sure you vote so I don’t have to go to a concentration camp.
Gosh, this background music sucks. It completely distracts me from the actual content of the clip.
3:20 The other day I was at the mall, and this lunatic runs by with a fully automatic obesity in his hands and starts shooting people full of it. Pure chaos.
So, these must be the states with the least amount of firearms per capita, and with the toughest firearm control laws?
Top 10 firearm mortality rates ...
Mississippi 33.9
Louisiana 29.1
New Mexico 27.8
Alabama 26.4
Wyoming 26.1
Alaska 25.2
Montana 25.1
Arkansas 23.3
Missouri 23.2
Tennessee 22.8
Top 10 homicide rates ...
Mississippi 23.7
Louisiana 21.3
Alabama 15.9
New Mexico 15.3
South Carolina 13.4
Missouri 12.4
Illinois 12.3
Maryland 12.2
Tennessee 12.2
Arkansas 11.7
Haha omfg "what college he go to??" Homeschooled 🤣💀😭😂😂😂😂 if fucking dying bro forget about gun violence leading cause of death was that clip right there!! 💀😭😂😂 Shit got me deader than any given child on any given schoolday.. 😬
When it is legal to sell your wepon at 3 am in the middle of a forrest to some Ted Kazinski lookin dude, and it's just up to you if you feel like you trust them is a slap in the face to the 3 day background check you have to do if you go to a licenced dealer. WI
One of the greatest Jon Stewart clips of all time
TV cable has so many gameshows nowadays. There should really be a “Debate This” gameshow where the contestants are given a topic, 10 minutes to research it, and then they’re assigned which side they need to take…and then debate it. Have a couple of debate experts to form a judges’ panel to award points, and then declare a winner. Maybe the final round would be to debate an expert debater for a grand prize. I think it’d be a huge hit! People love to watch others argue. 😂
The problem is you're asking someone to do research, ya know that's out of the scope of most people these days.
id watch it
They want to always argue that more guns make us safer, yet it's clear they are just as afraid of them as we are.
By their logic, they should allow everyone to bring guns to their campaign rallies and conventions then. They could be their own protection and we could save a lot of money paying for their security.
But these politicians make millions by making us less safe, so that's what they will keep doing.
Many of them should be in prison for endangering us all.
its almost as bad as the argument that making us equal makes us free
I've been saying for years that the biggest assault on the second amendment is how impossible it is for a homeless person to legally own a gun in the majority of states. I wish more people would call this out to the staunch supporters of the the 2nd amendment.
I grew up in a Christian homeschool environment. I used to go to homeschool group meetings. The Christian homeschoolers I’ve known have been some of the most strange, aggressive, and disconnected from reality compared to my public school friends (Christian or not). I’ve kept up with some and some got away from it… some did not.
I knew this one kid who shot and killed his mom and younger brother before turning the gun on himself (he survived). Their living style was akin to something you’d see on “Little House on the Prairie” except more strict and all boys.
P.S. I never really considered myself a Christian. I’m still weird though.
There’s a big difference between being in a Christian homeschool environment and a secular one. I agree with your observations though. The Christian homeschoolers I’ve met have been weirdly aggressive.
@@The_Winsome_Pixie I agree. I know fewer secular homeschoolers so maybe that part isn’t the most informed.
I definitely value a lot of the things that homeschooling gave me, but I was pretty lucky. It can be scary because it can be a way for abusive/delusional parents/guardians to have more control. And there’s a lot of criticism aimed at the HSLDA for neglecting to deal with that properly.
As an Oklahoman, this interview made me so happy.
Jon absolutely is a lib but he does make good transitional demands, the police point being a good example.
This GOP guy is a classic example of the Gish Gallop, AKA simply spewing baseless false assertions as fact as quickly as possible and constantly changing the subject in order to take advantage of the "Bullshit Asymmetry Principle", or the fact that it takes about 10 times longer to debunk a lie than to tell one.
You see a lot of right-wing "thinkers" using this "if I talk fast, people will think what I'm saying makes sense" dodge (Ben Shapiro is a great example). Compare such people to actual experts, who are often so happy to take all the time necessary to ensure that you understand every nuance of their expertise that you get bored to tears in the process.
"because it's the person that's the threat not the gun."
"So, let's do background checks."
"Nope!"
He was arguing like a 5 year old. He's pretty much going "uh uh! no, it's not!" when it came to what an anecdote is.
This guy can't even say that you have to register yourself to vote because that natural conclusion would invalidate his own argument of being against registering your firearm.
Trump’s would-be assassin came from a home with 2 parents and guns. So much for “fatherless homes” being the problem.
I propose the new Republican mascot be transitioned into a bee/parrot hybrid.
Amazing how easily they transition from one lie to the next
He's a conservative. It's all he can do since their positions generally aren't supported by evidence.
I wonder how petrified the cops would be doing their jobs if there were a billion guns in the U.S.A...
this guy got eviscerated lmao
why does this channel constantly have muzak playing wtf is that
Hahaha oh no dude forgot which side he was arguing when he was talking about the right to vote! 🤣💀 Homie was like "no thats literally my argument I making rn you're literally just arguing my own point at me!.." 😭😂😂 he had to reboot for a second and figure that one out 🤣
"I gotta pee" god Hasan is Fn unwatchable.
Actually kind of fair. At least I can watch it without Hasan's "reaction" relatively easily.
Steward for VP!
His Oklahoma lapel pin looks like a bloody butcher knife.
John Stewart for president!!
JOHN STEWART 2028
Debates on important issues are really important to have if you don’t want to CEDE ground to the right wing. I agree that they’re not much good at GAINING ground.
There's a reason that very few people debate JS. He demolishes them.
People still watch clips of JS debates from 10 _years_ ago.
He's vicious
It's really amazing people in the US are still having this exact same debate in 2024. It's the same as with universal healthcare. I get those things would be hard to do because of how impossibly big your country is an all but it's super weird that not only you have people against doing something about it, they are in favour of doing EVEN LESS.
Kind of surprising the US is a real country.
Turn that fuckin music off, jesus
"80% of school shooters came form broken/fatherless homes." Okay, sure - but also almost 80% of them used LEGALLY PURCHASED FIREARMS TOO. So, what? Are we just breaking even here now? Does that statistic cancel out *this* one?
Love how this guy wants to "fix" fatherlessness. Like... there's literally no way to do that. Even if you make divorce illegal, there will still be fatherlessness. And there's no way any Republican wants to make divorce illegal because they all ditch their wives for their secretaries every 20 years.
This is like trying to solve the problem of people falling off a cliff by saying gravity is to blame, and then refusing to put up a railing until you've "fixed" gravity.
Project 2025 is the plan
7 mountain mandate is the goal
7 says influence, 25 means takeover
You know what drives me insane above all other Just absolutely ridiculous arguments The gun lobbies cling to Is how misinterpreted the second amendment is. A well regulated malicia being necessary To the security of a free state The right of the people to their arm shall not be infringed. When that was written in seventeen seventy six we did not have The most powerful military in the world, Every branch under the DOD.... So It made sense for everybody to have firearms. Without Individuals.
Having firearms We never would have been our independence. However The constitution Was specifically designed To be altered and to be A living document. This country was created as the great experiment.... They designed it for a more perfect union , but they understood You're going to learn from your mistakes And as time goes on and lessons are learned You need to alter Outdated laws or With technology you must implement new laws. The second amendment isn't finite and it's specifically states The reasoning for the right to bear arms Is directly related to a well regulated militia being necessary Not for defense of your neighbor but for the free state. So it's specifically states.You have a right to bear arms to protect The nation state's security. There is only one reason to bear arms, and it is to protect the country two hundred years ago. I'm pretty sure Now that the united states has the most powerful military in the world. Not only that We have a national guard, And even the smallest.
Cities have police forces. In the year 2024 Are far more of a threat To the security of a free state than they are guardians of it. I'm not saying every militia Is dangerous finding me i'm just saying For the most part The major militias with the most members Are on the domestic terrorist list the FBI tracks. The amendment Isn't As broad as.
Others like Free speech.
Free press right to assemble.... Each of those has caviouts In certain speech easy legal but The amendment is written as broadly as possible... The second amendment Is One of the most specific of all the ammendments. It does.
N't say everybody has the right to bear arms and then Allow time and states and the people Crack down on Who shouldn't have weaponry. You only have the right to bear arms As a citizen To protect the freedom of the nation state. Just as A society progress And african americans Count as a whole person not just three fifths And us women can vote, Things that seem so obvious and Our mother with thinking Has a hard time imagining How it was Universally accepted that women Black the mental ability To be informed voters.... For some reason people believe The second amendment is a blanket For every citizen being able to own a weapon to protect themselves.... I'm pretty sure that's Because they had never actually read The second amendment as it was written or Like many people they can understand The difference between the militia being necessary to protect the free state In 1776 Is completely moot in 2024. So if you take out that part of the amendment Stating the people have the right to bear arms to protect the freedom of the nation. You negate the 2nd amendment. The constitution in the law was not meant to be stagnant and it was Intentionally meant to be a Constantly evolving and changing Document with one goal. In the pursuit of a more perfect Union... We're always Finding better ways to Do things with education and technology and trial and error. It's pretty obvious You don't need the gun for self protection If nobody owns guns. After the first In australia The primeThe prime minister Made a decision that It was not At all popular With a huge Portion of the population... A decision he knew Would be the end of his political career But he did what was right And outlawed private gun ownership. The n r a type groups were Up in arms and raising hell but within three months Of Open my shooting The prime minister saying We are out.
Lying all guns To the Log going onto the books and All guns being seized.... Three months. And a few years later Even the guys that Originally refused to hand over their weapons Change their minds because As one man stated I don't need to protect myself With a firearm if nobody else has a firearm. Nobody has to Be worried about Bringing
A knife to a good fight when It's impossible To show up with anything other than a bigger knife. So the argument Having everybody armed is Safer is completely ridiculous to begin with but has been proved But proven The best way to reduce gun violence And if you want proof of that look at Australia. I believe one year in the 2000s When your japan had all of eight Homicides committed with a gun.... The arguments Used by everybody who wants Did you join the NRA?And did you vote ditch about gun regulation Have nothing But Easily Destroyed , arguments , you do not just Annie doodle button pirical evidence To shoot them down as well as A very difficult time Taking the second amendment to a Constitutional lawyer who also Has an advanced degree in english and Can you look at the exact wording and understand That the way it was written It is important but also when it was written And why that made sense for the time and place?
In history and the way society functioned That made sense then There's no longer applicable. People love to pretend they know what they're talking about without understanding They are ignorant about What the amendment says and why It was important in 1776 But it isn't Simply unnecessary.
It is harmful To society in 2024. Should only white men who own land be able to vote, Should african americans not only Not have their freedom, but not even be.
A whole person .... Still.
Only three-fifths? It wasn't until the nineteen seventies that women could have a credit card In your own name without their husband Or a man Giving them permission? Before that was legal and i'm only forty. It's just the stupidity of the masses and the way they Pander to the lowest common denominator of Ignorant people Using In this representation of statistics And almost A group mentality and Without anybody using logic And pointing out all the major holes And they're terrible arguments but when you don't have any push back From rational people who can speak to Basic common sense and not engage in You're mongering but also not Come off as elitest and preachy. Mamma people using common sense and Showing examples of places like australia in Switzerland ( People with switzerland love guns almost everybody Shoots however They are culturally very different from us And although you may own and carry around your gun you cannot Own ammunitiom Without authorization.) I'm just so sick of Idiots preaching idiots about idiotic policies.
John Stewart actually knows how to stay focused. He doesn't let this guy do what every right-winger does, a barrage of random facts and talking points that prevent you from focusing on any particular point on the issue. You just end up exhausted by the end.
The only way to survive a debate with JOn Stewart.... is to be quiet and answer with factual information. Otherwise..... he will wipe the floor with your irrational and ridiculous opinions.
Americans have a right to have nuclear ballistic missiles. And they are arguing over guns.. so immature.
If I can't have pipe bombs in my trunk am I really living in a free country?
If the right hates shyt dads, why do they love Elon Musk???
A picture of a bad dad and im sure hed pop up at sine point. Yet, they love him....
😂😂😂😂
These people are nothing but clowns. I couldn't believe he blame children not having fathers in the home is the problem. 😱😱😱. I fell out 😄😄😄😄😄
MAGA CULT debate strategy: When clearly losing an argument, or being flat-out debunked, immediately change the subject
A brain that refuses logic will fight further and further dig deeper…he arrives at his position illogically you cannot move them with logic, you have to use illogical points….
NASCAR Drivers wear their Sponsors why doesn't politicians?
No matter the topic regarding lives, the GOP fails miserably to make a cogent argument for their talking points and policies. For example, when the third leading cause of death in the US was covid, and there was a means to drastically lower covid deaths, the GOP chose the least logical paths. This resulted in higher covid death rates in red counties.
I feel like the loss of life through fentanyl is higher numbers of adults while gun deaths are higher amongst children. Not that I’m saying that adults should die over children but I think we have more responsibility to protect children who can’t protect themselves. I’m all for fighting addiction and the opioid crisis as well and I think we can do both I just think his argument is illogical.
I love J.S. That was a bad argument though. “Bad guys” aren’t gonna register their guns… Sooo what’s the point of that?
What do you say to the ACAB people who think machine guns and tanks should be legal to civilians?
I love this cross-examination. John would have been a great litigator.