For the second riddle, I have to argue that the answer was rather illogical. There could have been someone in 'his' room that would have opened the door for him. It was the fact that he said 'Wrong room' and went for the direction of the elevators instead of his room, which raised my suspicion. Anyone else agree?
It makes more sense that people who get to the wrong room do that because they have gone to the corrispondent room of another floor rather than to another room of the same floor as their, if you understand what I mean.
True , also i assume that he would plunge head-first on to his death so most-likely he would be face down with his skull cracķed & not on his back ( he would have to be facing the person who shoved him off in order to land the way he did ) also this theory is only relevant if you base the riddle off of the sketch itself , i say this because one can't really notice if the windows are in fact open or closed !
It's not fair to have a riddle that leaves out important information. Like the guy with the gunshot wound in his car. If you leave out the information about what kind of car it is, the only way you can get that question right is if you simply guess. But when a riddle is designed to make someone guess it becomes unfair as there are too many possibilities. Also, My guess was that he was shot, but survived, got in his car and then bled out after locking himself inside, attempting to get further away. Which is just as good a possibility as the car being a convertible. Both answers are completely plausible, therefore no detective could possibly conclude that there is not entry point in the car because the roof was down, as there are many other possibilities, which again, makes this riddle unfair. Same with the riddle of the fly in the coffee, how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup that she recognized, or maybe the fly was still in it, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup. When riddles intentionally leave out information that is key to the answer, it makes the riddle unfair and in my opinion, is no longer a riddle worthy of deduction. If you read this I thank you, even if this comment gets no replies I hope someone reads it because these so called "riddles" really annoy me.
Im glad you guys read my comment, yes I understand I could have made it shorter, the reason it's long is honestly because this was a little frustrating and I wanted to be specific so that anyone who did read it would understand exactly what im trying to say.
wait but the riddle with the guy that was accused of killing his wife.... it was stated that " *everybody* in the room, turned and looked at the door" leaving me under the impression that every single person in the room was facing the door but the answer contradicted the riddle itself idk if I should be angry or what
Another problem with this riddle is "almost immediately after that, the jury comes up with a guilty verdict". This isn't how verdicts work - jurors come up with their verdicts after *all* courtroom proceedings have ended, and they don't do so in the courtroom but in a separate deliberation room.
@@ArsenaL_YT i used my brain. For example number ten she was stabbed in the car. So im like alright so theres going to be blood in the car. But nope im wrong because they figure out a harder way
6:47 My mom tought me that if there's something nasty in your food, like a hair or bug or something, put a LOT of salt on it before sending it back. If you get your food back and it's salty, then you know they gave you the same food.
i remember bingewatching detective mystery solving videos when i was 10 and this channel is one of those. now i'm a few years away from studying psychology at a university with a vast understanding of human behaviour considering that i'm only 16. coming back to these types of videos really brought back memories and nostalgia.
*All flaws in the riddles:* 9. Hotel Room: - the woman could have been suspicious because the man left towards the elevators. - it is plausible that the man knocked because he was staying with someone and didn't have a key. I've knocked on my own hotel room door many times. 7. Ice Tea: - the animations do not match up as there are no ice cubes depicted in the ice tea. So here we have to assume that the women have ice in their drink. 6. Mysterious death in the car: - again, we have to assume information about the type of car, which does not make it a riddle. - the man also could have been shot, then locked himself in his car before bleeding out. 5. Fly in coffee: - how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup or lipstick on it that she recognized, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup. 4, In court for killing the wife: - this is by far the stupidest riddle... the riddle states "Everybody in the room, including the judge and jury, turns and looks at the door." This should include the man who killed his wife. 3. A case of a smuggler: - how are we to assume that he doesn't smuggle clothes, or hats, or shoes into the country as he would be wearing them as well. - plus, "smuggle" is not the correct word to use here. By definition, smuggling is the act of "moving (goods) illegally into or out of a country." It is not illegal to bring bikes in and out of countries, even if those bikes are stolen. This is a very misleading use of the word smuggle. All the others are fine (although a little misleading). Thanks for reading XD
I agree with you on all of these except the court killer one. It specifically states that everyone looks at the door, while the defendant and his attorney stared at the jury to see there response. It made it clear that the killer was not looking at the door.
He is asking how we are supposed to know that she put it in the coffee before knowing the riddle. The answer is you do not know, and that riddle was not a good one. It would have been better if it said 'Just as she put in a spoonful of sugar, she noticed a fly... or something along those lines.
there were a lot like that....some had more than 1 answer also 'ice tea' doesn't have to have ice in it....its just the name of the drink like coke or pepsi...
Sometimes you have to think outside the box instead of thinking logically, and they specifically make the logical answer wrong and make the real answer stupidly obvious. I am not a fan of those kinds of riddles myself :p
tbh for that one i guessed that it would not have been as warm as freshly brewed coffee because she’d had it out for a while and that’s how she knew because honestly how tf are we supposed to know she likes sugar in her coffee
Lauren Bray I said the same thing.. Im like how did we know the windows had to be opened for him to throw out the cigarettes, how did we know it was a convertible.. Yea, just not enough information..
It says he opened the window and threw the cigarette out the window, went to the next floors and repeated the action. I agree about some of these being worded poorly. They are riddles, they're not going to spell it out for you. You need to read the words carefully and think outside the box. But these seem to have more than one logical solution. Dumb
The answer of the second one can also be that since he went to the elevator, he couldn't have had his room on the same floor, and therefore couldn't have mistaken it for his room
I think the woman was judgmental. BECAUSE, it's not necessary that there is only one person living in each room, there are STRONG possiblies that he was sharing his room with his family members or friends. And he can't take away the keys because it will give other roommates a tough time, if they want to go out, they can't go only because the man took the keys and he can't leave keeping the door open. Hence he did not take the keys and had to knock
7:57 I thought that was so because the lawyer couldn't proove anything and wasted the court's time. 2:40 The man could have been sharing his room with someone else. So, he could have actually been mistaken.
Seems to me that she would have noticed the fly as she was putting the sugar in the coffee. So that means the fly came after she put the sugar in the coffee. Also the new cup of coffee should have been hot to the touch. But i do like the riddles. And the 2 ladies that were drinking the iced tea that was a true story. That shouldn't have been a riddle.
Some of them aren't fair, the details of the riddle should be in the text, if otherwise, it is only pure speculation, like if there is sugar on a table, that doesn't mean you used it, or the fact that it didn't say she took a drink either.
Exactly. For the coffee riddle I guessed that she knew because the coffee wasn't freshly hot or it was lukewarm. For the car riddle I guessed that the man was shot somewhere else from long range and the murderer dragged his body into the car, then used the car keys to lock everything from the outside (but I guess that wouldn't make sense, since if the murderer had dragged him he probably would've rubbed gunpowder off onto the man's clothes, not to mention the bloodstains).
Agreed, I watched this since I have a degree in forensics and criminology, most of the riddles are not designed to be solved or have holes in logic. 10: just a riddle 9: is logical 8: "Man is said to jump out window" how do you know this if there were no witnesses to see and all windows were closed, also why could he have jumped off the roof? 7: never mentions key component of riddle 6: would not be hard to tell if you saw the scene and the key factor to quell the confusion was left out 5: again never mentions key component of riddle 4: how did the jury know that the defendant did not look at the door if they were all looking at the door and not him? Also, how are we supposed to know that the defendant did not look at the door. Also, he is still innocent until proven quilt so we cant make the assumption that he had killed her and therefore did not look for her. 3: how does he get back without his bicycle on a daily bases, and at some point they would notice that he always comes back without the bicycle and most likely travels with different bicycles. 2: who said that the police did not hit the rewind button before the play button? 1: good logic trick Only 3 of the questions are fair.
Mk_cmk igneous He said it was Ice Tea and that the detective opened the windows on every floor.... I will give you some wiggle room on the Bike one and Convertible.
Not that I've ever killed anyone, nor intend to, but I think if I had killed someone, and I was told they were about to walk into the room, I would be as curious as heck as to who was going to come in!
BASICALLY, the lawyer knows that his client is the murderer and they planned the whole 'wife is gonna enter' story to make the judge bail him out... so the murderer wasn't curious as he knew no one would show up
Xkcd comes to mind. Indeed, the questions posed by these riddles seem to have multiple potential explanations, and claiming only one of them is valid makes for a very bad riddle for several reasons.
Very true because in number 8 it clearly showed no windows on any of the floors and in the end it was clear that all the windows have been closed even though the showed building given to us has no windows-_-
There's a great version of the iced tea riddle that is more complicated but makes more sense in terms of a plausible story: A man is watching a baseball game at his local bar when another man, we'll call him Tony, walks in and orders to scotches both on the rocks. When the drinks are served the first man asks to switch with Tony and they do. Tony drinks his drink quickly, talks for a few minutes and leaves while the other man stays behind to finish his drink and the baseball game. A few hours later, he is dead and Tony knows it. Answer: Tony is a hit man for the maffia and the other man is a snitch who is paranoid that there's a hit out on him. Hes naturally suspicious when Tony orders him a drink, but after switching glasses, feels much safer. What he doesn't know is that Tony has done his research. Tony knows this guy is a baseball fan and will slowly sip his scotch during the long game. So he arranges with the bartender to have the poisoned ice cubes added to both drinks and his assassination is successful.
most of the riddles contained information that hadn't been discloses to us, so it is unfair to say that we must have 'assumed' that the situation was like it was e.g., the ice in the ice tea, the convertible car, the sugar
The picture of her lips indicated no lipstick, but there was a bowl of sugar on the table. What may be difficult is that some riddles are solved by the picture, others by the stated information. The first one was the most clever IMO. Poison in the ice cubes the most difficult.
The problem with bright side is that their “riddles” always have multiple possible answers and they stump you from solving the puzzles by omitting important information, information that would be clear had you been part of the actual situation, but not all omitted information is actually important so you more or less have to guess as to what they left out and if it is or is not going to lead you to the answer
I agree, last test stated the husband had been informed his wife was dead and had to come to the crime scene. ANYONE could assume that the police told him where his wife died ESPECIALLY since he was given information about her!
Alex Tucker no the right thing to do is to NOT invite the husband into the crime scene because the closest relative will always be the first suspect. It was a clear trap. You didn't want your suspect to came into the crime scene and tarnish it right? For victim confirmation it usually happens in the morgue because a dead human can wait. It's just wordplay. In this tests you simply need to find irregularities. But some i agree, like that coffee case is straight up dishonest as for keeping an important detail hidden simply to make it seems harder or more random.
Real detectives on a case take weeks, months, or even YEARS to solve a case. Despite the easiness of these, there’s no real comparison. 15 seconds? Really?
At first I understood that as the Layer was with the defendant and looked at them. Not necessarily that the defendant also looked at them. They should have said "the layer AND the defendant looked at them.
This title is extremely inaccurate attentive means good listener pay attention to important and details store information to keep in mind and remember when looking for your final answer most of these answers require assumptions that dont relate to how good you were listening
GavinT1101 Even the one In court for killing the wife. He said everyone looked at the door, but at the end he said the husband didn't look at the door. So you just have to assume he didn't.
Maybe she puts sugar as usual and it was too sweet, so she knew it was the same cup. But why would she put sugar in the first cup of coffee if she saw a fly in it?
@@mia_the_nerd1315 why would taste the coffee if see thought it once had a fly in it? She should of got up and went to Starbucks they only have ants in their coffee.
I know. I don’t get it. He literally said my wife will come in the room but he knew she wouldn’t. Why on earth would he say that? If he knew she wouldn’t come he should have also known he would die for lying.
Marian Marionette .. im sure if my attention was better (i was playing pubg) i might have figured a couple. I did the same thing with the other videos lol
For the mysterious man who knocked on the door thinking it was his, I thought she was suspicious because if he thought it was his then he would've gone to the room beside hers, because if he thought her room was his, then her room would've been close to his. But he rushed to the elevator instead if going to another room. Make sense? I didn't really know how to explain. Reply if you get what Im saying XD
Unless he realized it was the right room, but the wrong floor. He then went to the elevator, went up (or down) a flight, knocked on his room door (so that his spouse could let him in) and had a pleasant evening.
Half of these are missing the necessary information. How are we supposed to know the lady put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to assume the cops said literally "Your wife is murdered, you need to meet us at the crime scene" without telling the guy where it was? Etc. Etc. Granted, these are good brain teasers, but presenting it in the form of "Are you smart enough to solve the riddle?" Then giving us missing information so it's impossible to get some right, then questioning "How many did you get right?" sounds like you want people to feel like idiots.
Ej Icey they told you what the police told the guy. They did not put the line in quotes, which means it wasn’t exactly what they said, meaning we don’t know whether or not they actually mentioned where the crime scene was or not
*sORE WA CHIGAU YO!* A lot of the riddles used evidence that wasn't mentioned in the text (sometimes the evidence was in the images, sometimes it wasn't friccin there are all)
I think you're right. The one with the the coffee didn't make since. I didn't know they put sugar in coffee. Second of all, they didn't say there was sugar in the coffee.
This is more of a "play on words" than detective mysteries. So many facts and wording diverted purposely in order for you to picture it differently. They subtly hint something in a hidden manner, purposely, but if they mentioned "the window was closed" flat out it would be easier. So of course for this video segment they will do that on purpose. Proving my point even more that they diverted it will clear intent. The question mark could have very well meant a guess on who did it. In the real world that wouldnt hold up if you decided to sue. To name a few. Very disappointing.
Faris Maniar which just makes it worse that they expect us to suspect something without the evidence. If the detective got the information we got he would be unable to make an arrest as he would just be guessing and assuming extra things
LIES! Information: "Everybody in the room, including the judge and the jury, turns and looks at the door..." Answer: "The man who had been accused wasn't looking at the door." You LITERALLY said that EVERYBODY was looking at the door. You didn't say only the jury and the judge, you said INCLUDING.
Nater K it said that the lawyer and the defendant looked at the other people and that’s when the lawyer said that they had reasonable doubt that the wife was dead. BOOM
exactly it would make more sense if someone shot him and placed him there... and also if they got a clear shot (when car was roofless) why would he not have any gunpowder residue on his body
Why would a man even be on trial for killing his wife without a corpse to prove that she was dead? Why would anyone look at the door in the courtroom if that corpse existed?
Car alt. answer: the man was shot while he was outside his car. He got in the car and tried to get away but succomed to his wounds. Coffee alt. answer: there was her lipstick on the rim of the "new" glass as she had already taken a sip of the coffee.
#4 is completely ridiculous. Just because the man wasn't looking at the door he was immediately considered guilty? Seriously? Sure, him not looking at the door is at least somewhat suspicious, but that is just a mere suspicion it's not like it's evidence. I thought the reason why he was guilty because that was the final statement and the lawyer did not do a very good job defending him so that it was easy to decide that he was guilty.
Yes... I thought it was the last thing the lawyer said too. He worded it to make it seem like his client was not guilty and told the jury and judge that they already have doubts about his client killing his wife... lol, does the last one match with the 4th one. Man kills his wife and ends up in court lol. 1 and 4.
I think the answer was kinda dumb. Maybe he had told the lawyer to say it, and was more interested in how the others would react than in seeing what he already knew was going to happen. I thought the answer would be that since that since the wife didn't show up, they had just made it up to prove that the others weren't sure she was dead. And when they had made that up, they didn't seem reliable and were therefore verdicted guilty.
Populous3 Tutorials I know. I assumed he was using the same bike. There was nothing to indicate otherwise. I figured he was smuggling the sandbags too.
That’s the entire point of these riddles. Your brain naturally wants to assume and fill in the holes of the story with what you deem the most logical. And that’s why people don’t get them right. I got all of these right and I did that by reading the facts given and watching closely to see what my brain would automatically assume without any facts. That’s how I figured out the answers. For example with the smuggling one, I read “...crosses the Mexican border on his bicycle everyday” and I pictured the man crossing the border over and over on the same red bicycle and then I quickly realized that it didn’t say “his bicycle” but rather “a bicycle” and my brain had just automatically assumed he was riding the same bike everyday. That’s when I guessed he was smuggling different bikes in or (because who tf smuggles bikes) he was smuggling the tires of a bike or some important part of a bike.
Ken Martin I believe her due to the fact that I myself got almost all of them right just a few like the one with the windows and the guy who jumped out. I assumed it was something to do with the cigarette. So I wouldn’t be surprised if she got all of them right.
XtremeGaming Yeah, I can see a person getting most of them right, but not all. Especially the one with the "convertible" car that really didn't even make sense. I just don't believe that anyone got all of them right. I'm not buying it.
10: detective lied there was no shattered glass on the inside meaning it was broken from the inside. 9: he lost his key and his wife was in his room the reason he knocked 8: the detectives never knew exactly what level he jumped from there for he could have just well jumped from the roof. Etc like the rest
OMFG the one in the Ice I remember my teacher asking us about in 6th grade and I was the only person to figure out the answer in my class so I was a bit excited about seeing that one lol.
What if the guy from the "suicide" jumped from the ROOF and not the window. There was no statement saying access wasn't possible, so yea, it still could've been suicide :/ Edit: thankyou for the likes! Haha, it makes me feel smart lol :)
William Hathaway ...what? The convertible’s roof was open before the gunshot. No way could it open as soon as the gunshot sound was detected, as you claim. Those things take a couple seconds to open/close. And really, convertible roofs automatically open to loud sounds? Why?
I thought that the "suspicious man" in "number 9" was suspicious because he walked in the direction of the elevators after mixing up the rooms. That wouldn't make sense if he thought that 'her room' were 'his room.' He probably would've at least known what floor he was on; and only got the specific room on that floor mixed up. Right?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Gorgeousklutz98 Kad: She called the police because he had knocked on his own door, and that wouldn't make any logical sense because there's no reason to knock on your own door. I realize this. I was just stating my thought process before I knew the answer.
Tippy - san : It could make sense actually to knock at his own door. Let's say he could have been at the hotel with his wife (mistress) and forgot his key inside the room, so he knocks for his wife to open. Seeing it's not his wife, he realizes that he got the wrong room.
In the 9th riddle, even if the woman couldn't think of that knocking (normal people usually don't care) anyone could be suspicious about why the man would take the elevator if he thought it was his room as people normally get confused with adjacent rooms.... If u agree hit the like button!!
My only complaint is that the instructions stated to watch the riddle, which implied that the video was important. However, the video played no role, it was purely contextual clues within the wording of the riddle. This leads to the problem of Riddle #7 "Ice Tea". The video shows 6 glasses with none containing ice. They state the poison is contained within the ice. I can only assume the ice was in the pitcher, as the glasses clearly only contain tea, no ice visualized. This means that the pitcher's ice would melt, causing the poison to leak into the drink, so that the girl who is drinking quicker would actually have the higher risk of poison. The riddle, when accompanied with the video, becomes unsolvable, as the video lies about the content of the glasses. We could assume that the two women would have ice in their ice tea, however, what we're shown is that they are not, so the answer makes no sense. Otherwise, the riddles are fine... some force you to make assumptions. The bicycle smuggler, for example, could have been smuggling clothing, such as the hat he proudly flaunts, he could also be smuggling the sand himself, leading customs to believe that it's an item within the sand, not the sand itself.
Jonathan Chute I agree. Some of the visuals to represent the Riddle don't match up with the riddle themselves. The building suicide one and the ice tea one are the best examples since something is mentioned in the answers that isn't shown in the visuals.
I think the video helped in some way. The car one, I guessed the answer based on the picture, which was a convertible. And my answer for the court room came to me when I noticed the defendant had his dead down slightly. Made me re-read the text and gave away the answer.
I do agree some if the pictures can be misleading. But you can't rely entirely on the pictures if the information in the narration is enough. For example the building suicide narration gave plenty info as to how he solved the case, the visual was not needed. Where as the ice tea one you can assume using deductive reasoning that the ice was not in the pitcher because that would mean the girl who drank more would be poisened. So that means the ice had to be in the glasses and from there it's history.
The cup of coffee one had different answers, and not information. Like wouldn't she see the fly while mixing or putting sugar in her drink? I said because she already drank out of it and they didn't refill it.
Bryce Cravens i would not call these a riddle. Riddles are usually complex but have a logical solution contained within the riddle itself. Questions here are vague and do not give you any logical solution within the text. For example, Riddles are like figuring out that two plus two is four. Whereas these questions give you the number four, then you have to play a guessing game if the rest was either two times two or one times four.
no...for example the tea one never mentioned the sugar....they could have just said "the lady then put some sugar in her drink and drank blah blah blah but then saw a fly"
Some of these riddles have multiple plausible answers. SPOILER ALERT For example, look at riddle #5 (Fly in coffee) @6:06. The answer is that "she already put sugar in her previous cup of coffee". The riddle never mentioned sugar before that. The riddle could have said "she noticed a fly in her sweetened coffee", but it didn't. The riddle never mentions sugar. How are we supposed to assume she puts sugar in her coffee? It is also possible that the woman knew it was her cup of coffee because she had a lipstick stain on the rim of the cup of coffee. Neither sugar nor lipstick was mentioned in the riddle and both would be a reasonable guess.
P.O .S it isn’t, require you to look at the picture and some don’t. Like the convertible one, I didn’t get that cause I didn’t think I was meant to use to picture, when on the others I didn’t need to
Also, 5 and others have various answers for example because the coffee wasn’t as hot as the previous, also, who puts sugar in if you clearly see a dead bug in it?
also #2 I said because it was a womans voice or another persons voice on the tape recorder.....that could have also been right.....there were more than 1 right answer for the 'riddles' so it was kinda dumb.
And in 1, how was i supposed to figure out that they didn't tell him where the crime scene was?Nothing like that was implied it just says "they informed him that his wife had been killed and he had to arrive at the crime scene right away" or I'm just dumb and I don't understand a thing...also there was probably blood in his car so I thought this was the reason he was suspected..
A more plausible scenario for number 6 is that the guy was shot and managed to crawl away to his car and lock himself in (to feel safer) but bled to death before he could drive to get help
The tape recorder was recording long enough to capture the sound of the gunshot. At that point we can assume the man is dead. The tape recorder would then continue to record until it reached the end of the tape. At that time it may have rewound itself as many tape recorders/players used to do.
Winston Lee define "laying perfectly" who's to say it didn't fall out of his hand and just land that way? If it was pointed any other way you could still say it was perfect on the table.
jhitt79 Unless the man was very close to the table, there is no way a heavy object like a gun would fall on the table and stay there. And the tape probably ended in the gun shot, or else the detective would've taken that in account.
Yisus he was close to the table, perhaps you didn't notice he was sitting right at it. Why would the gunshot stop the recording? I'm not saying I'm right, or that their is only one possibility, but people here don't seem to have any critical thinking skills.
The hotel room: the reason it's suspicious is because he's headed back to the elevator, not because he knocked. Happens all the time: Two people stay at the same room, then one leaves for some brief errand and doesn't bring a key because the other person is staying behind. When he returns, he obviously knocks. But if you honestly make a mistake coming back, you then try the next door - not the next floor.
Yes, you can accidentally get off on the wrong floor, but that is not normally your first instinct. If I accidentally had the wrong room, my first action would be to check the room number on the door - that would tell me if I mistook the room on the same floor, or got the wrong floor entirely. But the guy in the story apparently made for the elevator post-haste, without even checking.
he was being targeted as he pressed whatever button brings it up. as it was going up he was shot and killed, the roof continuing to close by itself as ordered.
Ok if everyone in the room looked at the door then how would they know the killer didn’t look at the door🤔 cause they’re all paying attention to the door and not what the killer is doing.
Not only that, what if he was aware of the lawyers plan? Maybe he told him before about it, they usually talk about their defense plan BEFORE going to court sooo that is no argument even if they would have mentioned that he didn't look at the door
If he smuggles bicycles across the border (which, by the way, is an absolutely ridiculous thing to smuggle), how does he get back over to smuggle the next one?
But then what's the point of smuggling it? The whole point of a smuggle - nay, the definition of a smuggle - is to get it from one side of a border to the other without the authorities being aware of it. So he can't be using the same bike.
if he had brought a whole bunch of bikes together they would make him pay duty, so he brought them 1 by 1, and since it was considered his personal vehicle then they can't make him pay for it
Right!? I ended up getting a lot wrong because I had a different idea I was confident about that could probably work. In the end I got 2/10 exactly right.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey guys! How many riddles did you get right?
And if you love murder riddles, click here ruclips.net/video/CJc10xtJHgc/видео.html
i solved 4 riddles :D
BRIGHT SIDE hii
BRIGHT SIDE none
BRIGHT SIDE I got 4 riddles right
BRIGHT SIDE 3
For the second riddle, I have to argue that the answer was rather illogical.
There could have been someone in 'his' room that would have opened the door for him.
It was the fact that he said 'Wrong room' and went for the direction of the elevators instead of his room, which raised my suspicion. Anyone else agree?
SharpTech Gaming That's what I thought too
never thought of that
It makes more sense that people who get to the wrong room do that because they have gone to the corrispondent room of another floor rather than to another room of the same floor as their, if you understand what I mean.
For me, what was suspicious was that if he thought it was his room. Why did he knock or not try to use his key?
Maybe he thought there would be someone to open it for him. (e.g. Wife, children, friends)
What if the man jumped from the roof and not the window
true, true but did you see that there actually was no windows in the picture? like what?
True , also i assume that he would plunge head-first on to his death so most-likely he would be face down with his skull cracķed & not on his back ( he would have to be facing the person who shoved him off in order to land the way he did ) also this theory is only relevant if you base the riddle off of the sketch itself , i say this because one can't really notice if the windows are in fact open or closed !
How would he get onto the roof?
@@user-kl3rw1vt5r just like how he wouldve gotten on to any floor...using the stairs
BOOOM BOOLM BOOM!!
It's not fair to have a riddle that leaves out important information. Like the guy with the gunshot wound in his car. If you leave out the information about what kind of car it is, the only way you can get that question right is if you simply guess. But when a riddle is designed to make someone guess it becomes unfair as there are too many possibilities. Also, My guess was that he was shot, but survived, got in his car and then bled out after locking himself inside, attempting to get further away. Which is just as good a possibility as the car being a convertible. Both answers are completely plausible, therefore no detective could possibly conclude that there is not entry point in the car because the roof was down, as there are many other possibilities, which again, makes this riddle unfair.
Same with the riddle of the fly in the coffee, how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup that she recognized, or maybe the fly was still in it, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup.
When riddles intentionally leave out information that is key to the answer, it makes the riddle unfair and in my opinion, is no longer a riddle worthy of deduction. If you read this I thank you, even if this comment gets no replies I hope someone reads it because these so called "riddles" really annoy me.
BL4CK5M1TH 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
You didnt have to make the comment that long.
Im glad you guys read my comment, yes I understand I could have made it shorter, the reason it's long is honestly because this was a little frustrating and I wanted to be specific so that anyone who did read it would understand exactly what im trying to say.
BL4CK5M1TH agreed
but they added a cartoon drawing of a convertible
Bright Side:"OnlY tHe mOSt AtTenTiVE peOlPe caN SolVe tHem!"
Me: Watches 5 different riddle videoes, all sharing the same riddle
WAIT A MINUTE
I don’t understand fly in coffee. My answer for the riddle is that SHE LITERALLY SAW THE FLY AGAIN! He never said anything about there being sugar.
I also noticed Peter Griffin in the court room at riddle number 4! 😂
Lol
Yeah and some of them were in movies 😂
@@BullyMaguire2024 that true!
@@tanyitmengunofficial9381 I know right
wait but the riddle with the guy that was accused of killing his wife.... it was stated that " *everybody* in the room, turned and looked at the door" leaving me under the impression that every single person in the room was facing the door but the answer contradicted the riddle itself idk if I should be angry or what
But then it says that the lawyer and the defendant were looking at them(jury and judge), not at the door.
Radu Cora - But if the judge/jury were looking at the door, how would they know the lawyer and defendant weren't?
Another problem with this riddle is "almost immediately after that, the jury comes up with a guilty verdict". This isn't how verdicts work - jurors come up with their verdicts after *all* courtroom proceedings have ended, and they don't do so in the courtroom but in a separate deliberation room.
Ah ha!! the lawyer was his accomplice since he wasn't looking at the door either...
I though it was because his wife didn’t enter the room, meaning the lawyer had lied.
*Who else thinks that the questions are not well explained ????*
Know Berries I do
It is explained as riddles only u use your brain
These riddles are designed to catch you out with vague details... there is no way to solve them.
@@ArsenaL_YT i used my brain. For example number ten she was stabbed in the car. So im like alright so theres going to be blood in the car. But nope im wrong because they figure out a harder way
I do
6:47 My mom tought me that if there's something nasty in your food, like a hair or bug or something, put a LOT of salt on it before sending it back. If you get your food back and it's salty, then you know they gave you the same food.
So either ways, your still putting it in your mouth cause you need to taste it right
what else would you do with food you ordered?
Genius
EthalaRide thank you for the life hack!
Or it's salty because the cook ejaculated in it. Enjoy slurping that to see if it's salty or not.
I never send food back. I eat it or leave.
i remember bingewatching detective mystery solving videos when i was 10 and this channel is one of those. now i'm a few years away from studying psychology at a university with a vast understanding of human behaviour considering that i'm only 16. coming back to these types of videos really brought back memories and nostalgia.
Well done!!!
Dude psych is awesome
*All flaws in the riddles:*
9. Hotel Room:
- the woman could have been suspicious because the man left towards the elevators.
- it is plausible that the man knocked because he was staying with someone and didn't have a key. I've knocked on my own hotel room door many times.
7. Ice Tea:
- the animations do not match up as there are no ice cubes depicted in the ice tea. So here we have to assume that the women have ice in their drink.
6. Mysterious death in the car:
- again, we have to assume information about the type of car, which does not make it a riddle.
- the man also could have been shot, then locked himself in his car before bleeding out.
5. Fly in coffee:
- how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup or lipstick on it that she recognized, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup.
4, In court for killing the wife:
- this is by far the stupidest riddle... the riddle states "Everybody in the room, including the judge and jury, turns and looks at the door." This should include the man who killed his wife.
3. A case of a smuggler:
- how are we to assume that he doesn't smuggle clothes, or hats, or shoes into the country as he would be wearing them as well.
- plus, "smuggle" is not the correct word to use here. By definition, smuggling is the act of "moving (goods) illegally into or out of a country." It is not illegal to bring bikes in and out of countries, even if those bikes are stolen. This is a very misleading use of the word smuggle.
All the others are fine (although a little misleading).
Thanks for reading XD
I agree with you on all of these except the court killer one. It specifically states that everyone looks at the door, while the defendant and his attorney stared at the jury to see there response. It made it clear that the killer was not looking at the door.
True, but also just because he doesn't look at a door should not mean he is guilty... people would be looking for more substantial evidence than that.
This is all so accurate and true
About the Ice tea, of course ice teas have ice, I mean who would enjoy ice tea without ice
True haha
I have a question about the fly in coffee riddle. How are we supposed to know that she put the sugar on the table in the coffee?!?!
careforicebear because it tasted sweet in the end.
He is asking how we are supposed to know that she put it in the coffee before knowing the riddle. The answer is you do not know, and that riddle was not a good one. It would have been better if it said 'Just as she put in a spoonful of sugar, she noticed a fly... or something along those lines.
there were a lot like that....some had more than 1 answer also 'ice tea' doesn't have to have ice in it....its just the name of the drink like coke or pepsi...
Sometimes you have to think outside the box instead of thinking logically, and they specifically make the logical answer wrong and make the real answer stupidly obvious. I am not a fan of those kinds of riddles myself :p
tbh for that one i guessed that it would not have been as warm as freshly brewed coffee because she’d had it out for a while and that’s how she knew because honestly how tf are we supposed to know she likes sugar in her coffee
They don’t give enough information in most of them. And how would we know the lady put sugar in it?
That is the fastest I got. That's the point of a riddle . They told you she noticed it was the same, so you deduct : how she noticed.
Yes, because if you drink your coffee sweetened, you will definitely taste it before adding sugar.
Did you not see the sugar?
that is the purpose of this video mate..
I thought the coffee was still the same due to the temperature.
I would sue the police if detectives actually solved cases like this
nice
Hahaha you are 100% correct
@@jeroenpro1499 how many riddles did you solved
@@yashwanthdivate1883 like 3 or so i think
😄
I didn't solve many.
But I'm playing the: *English isn't my first language and I couldn't understand everything.* - Card
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp this actually really is an excuse for the first one :D
English isn't the first language of whoever wrote these either. It is probably the first language of the actor reading it, though.
Nice username
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp i love you username XD
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp, You have a very creative username.
There’s not enough detail, especially the fly in the coffee, you should’ve said that she had previously put sugar in her coffee.
ikr, it could have been cold, heck, it could've still had the fly in it!
I seen the sugar on the table, which made me guess it would of been to sweet if she put more sugar in the same coffee.
Lauren Bray I said the same thing.. Im like how did we know the windows had to be opened for him to throw out the cigarettes, how did we know it was a convertible.. Yea, just not enough information..
It says he opened the window and threw the cigarette out the window, went to the next floors and repeated the action. I agree about some of these being worded poorly. They are riddles, they're not going to spell it out for you. You need to read the words carefully and think outside the box. But these seem to have more than one logical solution. Dumb
But yea, the convertible one was terrible.
Video : *What does he smuggle?*
Me : *He smuggles sand.*
Edit 1 : *OMG! 870 likes! Thanks guys.. love ya :D*
Same.
same
Maybe he is smuggle gold... because gold is same as sand.... 😇😇😇
Lol because of sand
I laughed so hard at this
The answer of the second one can also be that since he went to the elevator, he couldn't have had his room on the same floor, and therefore couldn't have mistaken it for his room
I think the woman was judgmental.
BECAUSE, it's not necessary that there is only one person living in each room, there are STRONG possiblies that he was sharing his room with his family members or friends. And he can't take away the keys because it will give other roommates a tough time, if they want to go out, they can't go only because the man took the keys and he can't leave keeping the door open. Hence he did not take the keys and had to knock
Don't you think this is more logical?
@@Tawnyaise0 yeah man I think the riddle was wrong
yeah this is a far better answer
@@mw00295 ikr
These riddles have multiple solutions
true
Ya but they only made one to challenge your brain I mean that's what challenges is all about
derekmcgoldrick true
7:57 I thought that was so because the lawyer couldn't proove anything and wasted the court's time.
2:40 The man could have been sharing his room with someone else. So, he could have actually been mistaken.
@@cluky-wf3hz what if it was a new person goes to the elevator down to his floor then go to the same room as the one above him
It was also possible he was trying to look for a room of a friend and was accidentally given the wrong room number.
Could be possible
But he should have checked the room number before knocking.
Okay but you have to TELL US she put sugar in the coffee beforehand in order for it to be a fair riddle. We can't just assume that.
Right!!!!
Seems to me that she would have noticed the fly as she was putting the sugar in the coffee. So that means the fly came after she put the sugar in the coffee. Also the new cup of coffee should have been hot to the touch. But i do like the riddles. And the 2 ladies that were drinking the iced tea that was a true story. That shouldn't have been a riddle.
the answers for those riddles arent definite, it could be anything. she could have seen the waiter or whatever
Exactly!
you must had notice the sugar cubes right next to the pancakes
are you trying to tell me those ice cubes didn’t melt the slightest bit when she had 5 iced teas, also who drinks 5 iced teas???
Me
So true while she was drinking her third cup the fifth and fourth cup the ice should have melted
@@fukumean77 but why would u order 5 teas at a time
@@helloiexist3333 You got me there.
She dint order all of them together she ordered one by one while waiting for the other one to finish
Some of them aren't fair, the details of the riddle should be in the text, if otherwise, it is only pure speculation, like if there is sugar on a table, that doesn't mean you used it, or the fact that it didn't say she took a drink either.
an angry shadow 2 I was thinking the same thing it never specified that it had sugar in the coffee
Josh Bowers same thing with the convertable.
Exactly. For the coffee riddle I guessed that she knew because the coffee wasn't freshly hot or it was lukewarm. For the car riddle I guessed that the man was shot somewhere else from long range and the murderer dragged his body into the car, then used the car keys to lock everything from the outside (but I guess that wouldn't make sense, since if the murderer had dragged him he probably would've rubbed gunpowder off onto the man's clothes, not to mention the bloodstains).
Agreed, I watched this since I have a degree in forensics and criminology, most of the riddles are not designed to be solved or have holes in logic.
10: just a riddle
9: is logical
8: "Man is said to jump out window" how do you know this if there were no witnesses to see and all windows were closed, also why could he have jumped off the roof?
7: never mentions key component of riddle
6: would not be hard to tell if you saw the scene and the key factor to quell the confusion was left out
5: again never mentions key component of riddle
4: how did the jury know that the defendant did not look at the door if they were all looking at the door and not him? Also, how are we supposed to know that the defendant did not look at the door. Also, he is still innocent until proven quilt so we cant make the assumption that he had killed her and therefore did not look for her.
3: how does he get back without his bicycle on a daily bases, and at some point they would notice that he always comes back without the bicycle and most likely travels with different bicycles.
2: who said that the police did not hit the rewind button before the play button?
1: good logic trick
Only 3 of the questions are fair.
On an unrelated note, this comment got way too many likes.
How am I suppose to know if there was ice or windows in the building or glass ?
The title of the riddle is "Ice Tea" and the narrator said that they were drinking iced tea
iced tea doesn't require ice in it >.>
The one with the building, it mentioned that the detective opened the windows facing the mans body
Lil Trump the best Ice tea is more like a slush
Mk_cmk igneous He said it was Ice Tea and that the detective opened the windows on every floor.... I will give you some wiggle room on the Bike one and Convertible.
Not that I've ever killed anyone, nor intend to, but I think if I had killed someone, and I was told they were about to walk into the room, I would be as curious as heck as to who was going to come in!
Basically,the one with the wife is wrong,since we were told EVERYONE in the room turned to look at the door
BASICALLY, the lawyer knows that his client is the murderer and they planned the whole 'wife is gonna enter' story to make the judge bail him out... so the murderer wasn't curious as he knew no one would show up
*BASICALLY* the husband was actually wife with plastic surgery after killing the husband
So she was looking at herself
Not only that, but in such a case wouldn't the man also know about the plan of the lawyer? Besides the lawyer didn't look at the door as well
@@alexapadackles118 Maybe someone at the door had a big mirror. Thought of that, huh?
I tought he was smuggling him self😂🤦🏿♂️
😂
I got this right
i thought he was smuggling sand
Yeah me too. I missed this one.
That is a whole new level 😂
Intentionally leaving key information out does not a riddle make.
Owning the same nail polish does not a murderer make?
6235river I didn't get any right because the miracle never happen
this is like more a funny pop quiz than a riddle
firstly, quit using misleading graphics.
secondly, there's a difference between a riddle, and being bad at communication.
There's also a difference between being tricked by the riddle and riddle having a flaw in it.
Xkcd comes to mind. Indeed, the questions posed by these riddles seem to have multiple potential explanations, and claiming only one of them is valid makes for a very bad riddle for several reasons.
Very true because in number 8 it clearly showed no windows on any of the floors and in the end it was clear that all the windows have been closed even though the showed building given to us has no windows-_-
Really ten, nine, and seven had to be “don’t look the picture it doesn’t show resemblance to the riddle”
Yea
8/10. The iced tea and window one were both ridiculous.
Edit: This apparently has 250+ likes now 😂.
the ice tea was, the window kinda is, but i have seen it before.
what if he jumped from roof and not window?
Cyanide7662 ....the literal name is called iced tea, so it has ice in it.
There's a great version of the iced tea riddle that is more complicated but makes more sense in terms of a plausible story:
A man is watching a baseball game at his local bar when another man, we'll call him Tony, walks in and orders to scotches both on the rocks. When the drinks are served the first man asks to switch with Tony and they do. Tony drinks his drink quickly, talks for a few minutes and leaves while the other man stays behind to finish his drink and the baseball game. A few hours later, he is dead and Tony knows it.
Answer:
Tony is a hit man for the maffia and the other man is a snitch who is paranoid that there's a hit out on him. Hes naturally suspicious when Tony orders him a drink, but after switching glasses, feels much safer. What he doesn't know is that Tony has done his research. Tony knows this guy is a baseball fan and will slowly sip his scotch during the long game. So he arranges with the bartender to have the poisoned ice cubes added to both drinks and his assassination is successful.
Dr. Mike Zahalsky same
Case 6: The man might had been shot first and then he tried to escape and get into the car but died of bleeding.
Maybe his window was open and someone shot him while driving by
CHOUDHARY_SAHAB then there should be blood on where he was shot to his car
I thought the same but his answer was different
No man can do this after getting shooted at head
Yukizuchi
If the window was open, why did the description of the scene say that the doors were locked and the windows were closed?
most of the riddles contained information that hadn't been discloses to us, so it is unfair to say that we must have 'assumed' that the situation was like it was
e.g., the ice in the ice tea, the convertible car, the sugar
the car in the picture was a convertible. But it's true that that was unfair. I assumed the window was down then someone came and pulled it up again.
yea, the sugar was so shady. my answer was possibly a small smudge of her lipstick on the cup.
The ice tea one I got right only because of the picture but the convertible i didn’t pay attention to that well but the sugar one definitely mislead
The first one threw me for a loop, because i was expecting a Detective riddle, not an Dumb Wordplay that happenes to feature an Detective.
The picture of her lips indicated no lipstick, but there was a bowl of sugar on the table. What may be difficult is that some riddles are solved by the picture, others by the stated information. The first one was the most clever IMO. Poison in the ice cubes the most difficult.
Who else lies to themselves by pretending to feel good when you "solve" a riddle you have heard before.
TitanicMeteor me
TitanicMeteor just to be honest
Mee i got em right some
Skyla Greenway i heard ? Blacksmith and Ice tea and hotel room one
I SAID 8TH QUESTIONS CORRECT
The problem with bright side is that their “riddles” always have multiple possible answers and they stump you from solving the puzzles by omitting important information, information that would be clear had you been part of the actual situation, but not all omitted information is actually important so you more or less have to guess as to what they left out and if it is or is not going to lead you to the answer
Bright side does really misleading tests lets be real
like the fly in coffee they didn't say she put sweetener
I agree the solid ones could win you a drink at a bar the sketchy ones could get you beat up
I agree, last test stated the husband had been informed his wife was dead and had to come to the crime scene. ANYONE could assume that the police told him where his wife died ESPECIALLY since he was given information about her!
Alex Tucker no the right thing to do is to NOT invite the husband into the crime scene because the closest relative will always be the first suspect. It was a clear trap. You didn't want your suspect to came into the crime scene and tarnish it right? For victim confirmation it usually happens in the morgue because a dead human can wait. It's just wordplay. In this tests you simply need to find irregularities. But some i agree, like that coffee case is straight up dishonest as for keeping an important detail hidden simply to make it seems harder or more random.
Real detectives on a case take weeks, months, or even YEARS to solve a case. Despite the easiness of these, there’s no real comparison. 15 seconds? Really?
yeah ur right
It’s not really forensics really it’s kinda a riddle
Some ridlles really have no logic.
Is it the ice cubes
that first one
I solved 6
Yeah smuggling bycicles is ludicrous as they can be transported legally. By this logic, he could have also been "smuggling" sand or bags.
by some you mean pretty much all of them
"Everyone in the room looked at the door", 20 seconds later "The man did not look at the door"
“ and the lawyer with the defendant look at them”
Beschdl it's from a korean movie the client
At first I understood that as the Layer was with the defendant and looked at them. Not necessarily that the defendant also looked at them. They should have said "the layer AND the defendant looked at them.
HAHAHA I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING. these are so rearded
The writing says "The lawyer with the defendant look at them" the guy speaking says "the lawyer with the defendant lookS at them" bad delivery.
ok but if the roof was open when he was shot, how did it close after?
Wow your a smart kid I didn't even think of that respect seriously how did it close by itself
army!!
the killer closed it
Ikr
i closed it
Plot Twist: The Fly Wants A Cup Of Coffee
Moral of the story: dont name your kid question mark
Yep
Exactly.
lol
the kids name was Mark...not question Mark
Or mark
I love how most of these would be impossible to figure out unless you either had more details or were actually there.
This title is extremely inaccurate attentive means good listener pay attention to important and details store information to keep in mind and remember when looking for your final answer most of these answers require assumptions that dont relate to how good you were listening
Unkown ElectronicMusic yeah like the sugar one. It never says she puts sugar in it so you just have to assume
GavinT1101 Even the one In court for killing the wife. He said everyone looked at the door, but at the end he said the husband didn't look at the door. So you just have to assume he didn't.
Unkown ElectronicMusic I
Who else noticed the incorrect order of the numbering??
👇
Y did the lady put sugar even if it contained fly :p
that's right....who knows?
Nope.. may be to trap the waiter as she knew he would just remove the fly and bring back same cup
The most likely guess is that she put sugar before she noticed the fly.
The fly was on the bottom of the sugar cube? Back of the spoon? Who knows, bad riddle regardless.
Lokesh Agrawal she might be drinking black coffee...after mixing suger the fly might have surfaced and she noticed
Not good - could have multiple answers
Yeah but like in any other cases you can make story out of it but only have one truth
but if she always drinks her coffee with sugar then why did she taste the new one before putting in sugar ???
Good point good point well played
Maybe she puts sugar as usual and it was too sweet, so she knew it was the same cup. But why would she put sugar in the first cup of coffee if she saw a fly in it?
Maybe she was testing it to be sure it was different
she put the sugar after she saw the fly. She usually drink coffe without sugar
@@mia_the_nerd1315 why would taste the coffee if see thought it once had a fly in it? She should of got up and went to Starbucks they only have ants in their coffee.
7:12 bruh you said everybody in the room
I know. I don’t get it. He literally said my wife will come in the room but he knew she wouldn’t. Why on earth would he say that? If he knew she wouldn’t come he should have also known he would die for lying.
you miss out really important details. Like you didn't say the coffee had sugar in it, and didn't say the car was a convertable.
Ponz it’s not supposed to
Leaving out important details is part of it lol
Vex_ Hunter thats how I figured it out
or for example, who the heck closed the roof?
Or he could have been shot outside of the car then placed inside
Zero.. i guess thats why i work at walmart
HipsterBot my brother works at dollar general also known as DG
HipsterBot the second one was easy,
cause if you think about it,
People would just walk in, if it was locked they would unlock it.
but thats just me..
Marian Marionette .. im sure if my attention was better (i was playing pubg) i might have figured a couple. I did the same thing with the other videos lol
HipsterBot meh. Like i said, its just me. :p
how did the guy in the car close the convertible top after being shot?
The murderer closed the top probably
Lily Armstrong he could have just as easily closed the car door. The riddle was irrelevant 🤔
was thinking the same thing before I see your comment
I Too Had This Question.
Magic
What if he didnt wanted to reveal his identity and putted question mark on the note 🤔
cool name because the note also said “that’s who threw the snowball”
If he was smuggling bicycles, how was he coming back to his country? On foot, or smuggling the same looking bicycle back where he came from?
He rode across everyday with an old bicycle and rode back later with a new one.
That doesn't make sense
Rafał Figiel
He smuggled Sneakers back to the US 😳
Shoes, clothes ,caps,gold in tyres
I don’t think the investigators got 15 seconds to solve the mystery.
Theres the pause button.......
uoy said is
Can anyone understand what a joke is?
Waisu THANK YOU
Could’ve told us it was a convertible...
It had a pic of a convertable
if we're going by the picture then we have to ask the question, how is the roof now up if he got shot when the roof was down?
Wouldn't have closed after being shot
galaxy girl gaming I've never seen a covertable. I would not have know that was a convertablw
GoalzGoneWild thats what I was thinking
Glass broken:
Me:
WHAT WHERE IS THE SHATTERED GLASS
For the mysterious man who knocked on the door thinking it was his, I thought she was suspicious because if he thought it was his then he would've gone to the room beside hers, because if he thought her room was his, then her room would've been close to his. But he rushed to the elevator instead if going to another room. Make sense? I didn't really know how to explain. Reply if you get what Im saying XD
Unless he realized it was the right room, but the wrong floor. He then went to the elevator, went up (or down) a flight, knocked on his room door (so that his spouse could let him in) and had a pleasant evening.
That's what I thought too
skip to Thats what i thought too
skip to I thought the same..
Thats what i thought too, also how do we know that he simply didnt come with someone else and that he wasn't knoking for them to open
Half of these are missing the necessary information.
How are we supposed to know the lady put sugar in her coffee?
Are we supposed to assume the cops said literally "Your wife is murdered, you need to meet us at the crime scene" without telling the guy where it was?
Etc. Etc.
Granted, these are good brain teasers, but presenting it in the form of "Are you smart enough to solve the riddle?" Then giving us missing information so it's impossible to get some right, then questioning "How many did you get right?" sounds like you want people to feel like idiots.
That's why he joked at the start of the video about this being good for your brain - the riddles are meant to be taken with a grain of salt.
Hazerd ikr!!!!
Hazerd f
Hazerd you dont need to assume,they told you what the police said
Ej Icey they told you what the police told the guy. They did not put the line in quotes, which means it wasn’t exactly what they said, meaning we don’t know whether or not they actually mentioned where the crime scene was or not
Hold on smart arse..how bout this.(man shot dead inside car) he was shot somewhere else and then the body was placed in the car)
Himprabal Kaushik I was saying the same thing
thought so too because THERE MUST BE gundowder on his clothes, with or without wind, it will stick on fiber.
I was thinking he was shot and trying to drive himself to the hospital LoL
@@trejosworld Me too! He was definitely shot elsewhere.
That's what I was thinking too
Got 7 of them right but still some of them were absurd and not clearly stated and could possibly have different sensible explainions.
Nice work I got 6
*sORE WA CHIGAU YO!*
A lot of the riddles used evidence that wasn't mentioned in the text (sometimes the evidence was in the images, sometimes it wasn't friccin there are all)
Crazy at Heart It bugs me that you didn't capitalize the s in "sore".
10/10
Reference
I think you're right. The one with the the coffee didn't make since. I didn't know they put sugar in coffee. Second of all, they didn't say there was sugar in the coffee.
Isabella 27 lol
Jada Fisher they could have added an info like "a woman with a sweet tooth" to hint about the sugar
This is more of a "play on words" than detective mysteries. So many facts and wording diverted purposely in order for you to picture it differently. They subtly hint something in a hidden manner, purposely, but if they mentioned "the window was closed" flat out it would be easier. So of course for this video segment they will do that on purpose. Proving my point even more that they diverted it will clear intent. The question mark could have very well meant a guess on who did it. In the real world that wouldnt hold up if you decided to sue. To name a few. Very disappointing.
exactly what i said about the Last one
yogesh battarai if waana know to add if wanna know to
This isn't the real world though.
Yh no offence but some of the answers were dodge af and there could’ve been a bunch of reasons
But then again it’s like a real investigation where you barely get any information
Faris Maniar which just makes it worse that they expect us to suspect something without the evidence. If the detective got the information we got he would be unable to make an arrest as he would just be guessing and assuming extra things
Jayson that is true as most of them lack crucial information
The coffee one didn't tell us there was already sugar in the coffee, I thought it was cos the fly was still there
Faris - no it's not. If you wanna see how real investigations go watch First 48. That is real as it gets.
Why this video has so many likes? 90% of the comments are from people who complain about the illogical riddles lol
I got one right 😅😅😅
I got two right😂
hana gomez me too!
give urself a coffee...it makes people smart
I got only 1 wrong😂😂😂😂am 1 a genius
hana gomez same
LIES!
Information: "Everybody in the room, including the judge and the jury, turns and looks at the door..."
Answer: "The man who had been accused wasn't looking at the door."
You LITERALLY said that EVERYBODY was looking at the door. You didn't say only the jury and the judge, you said INCLUDING.
Nater K it said that the lawyer and the defendant looked at the other people and that’s when the lawyer said that they had reasonable doubt that the wife was dead. BOOM
Nater K for real and if the car roof was down when he shot him who put it up after he died
Nater K
exactly it would make more sense if someone shot him and placed him there... and also if they got a clear shot (when car was roofless) why would he not have any gunpowder residue on his body
Why would a man even be on trial for killing his wife without a corpse to prove that she was dead? Why would anyone look at the door in the courtroom if that corpse existed?
Car alt. answer: the man was shot while he was outside his car. He got in the car and tried to get away but succomed to his wounds.
Coffee alt. answer: there was her lipstick on the rim of the "new" glass as she had already taken a sip of the coffee.
Raptorsaurlophus draws or the bug was still in the coffee
Julia C. The waiter took out the bug from the coffee, and gave the same one back.
i thought the same with the coffee one or that the coffee was cold
I was thinking there might’ve been s fly leg left
I just got 2 correct answers! Please do a lot of this kind of videos!
#4 is completely ridiculous. Just because the man wasn't looking at the door he was immediately considered guilty? Seriously? Sure, him not looking at the door is at least somewhat suspicious, but that is just a mere suspicion it's not like it's evidence. I thought the reason why he was guilty because that was the final statement and the lawyer did not do a very good job defending him so that it was easy to decide that he was guilty.
... besides that they did say "EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM LOOKED AT THE DOOR." I was pretty mad about that.
Yes... I thought it was the last thing the lawyer said too. He worded it to make it seem like his client was not guilty and told the jury and judge that they already have doubts about his client killing his wife... lol, does the last one match with the 4th one. Man kills his wife and ends up in court lol. 1 and 4.
How where we supposed to know that he wasn't looking at the door.
Also the man lied
Hate
At 10:18 the person talking says suspected but the text says suspended
Real detective work 11/10
TrickTime exactly
TrickTime your a knob
Lol
watch me get them all wrong and lie about it
I thought Armys were great detectives.. Lol I guess we both aren't.. 😅
Mabelle Faith I just got 2 right answers
YASSS ARMYY lol😜😂😂♥️♥️
COUGHT IN A LIEEEEE
I see armys wherever i go argh this is scary XD #ARMYSFTW
best part of bright side is that no ads are there to interrupt you
like if u too liked this feature of our favourite youtube riddle chaanel
7:55
YOU SAID "EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM" LOOKED AT THE DOOR
I guess it does say “and the lawyer with the defendant looks at them” but I see your point and I think it’s kind of dumb as well
Hinto Lime yeah that’s what I thought too
Ya bro ..you are right ...
It should say "Everybody in the room looks at the door while the lawyer with the defendant looks at them."
I think the answer was kinda dumb. Maybe he had told the lawyer to say it, and was more interested in how the others would react than in seeing what he already knew was going to happen. I thought the answer would be that since that since the wife didn't show up, they had just made it up to prove that the others weren't sure she was dead. And when they had made that up, they didn't seem reliable and were therefore verdicted guilty.
the smuggler one is terrible, he could even smuggle sand bags, or mexican hats, there was no evidence he had a new bike everytime
Populous3 Tutorials I know. I assumed he was using the same bike. There was nothing to indicate otherwise. I figured he was smuggling the sandbags too.
That’s the entire point of these riddles. Your brain naturally wants to assume and fill in the holes of the story with what you deem the most logical. And that’s why people don’t get them right.
I got all of these right and I did that by reading the facts given and watching closely to see what my brain would automatically assume without any facts. That’s how I figured out the answers.
For example with the smuggling one, I read “...crosses the Mexican border on his bicycle everyday” and I pictured the man crossing the border over and over on the same red bicycle and then I quickly realized that it didn’t say “his bicycle” but rather “a bicycle” and my brain had just automatically assumed he was riding the same bike everyday. That’s when I guessed he was smuggling different bikes in or (because who tf smuggles bikes) he was smuggling the tires of a bike or some important part of a bike.
Amanda Burns I don't believe you got all of them right. Not at all.
Ken Martin I believe her due to the fact that I myself got almost all of them right just a few like the one with the windows and the guy who jumped out. I assumed it was something to do with the cigarette. So I wouldn’t be surprised if she got all of them right.
XtremeGaming Yeah, I can see a person getting most of them right, but not all. Especially the one with the "convertible" car that really didn't even make sense. I just don't believe that anyone got all of them right. I'm not buying it.
10: detective lied there was no shattered glass on the inside meaning it was broken from the inside.
9: he lost his key and his wife was in his room the reason he knocked
8: the detectives never knew exactly what level he jumped from there for he could have just well jumped from the roof. Etc like the rest
for number 10 that was the first thing I notice i tough they would ask a question that had to do with that but they asked who threw the rock
OMFG the one in the Ice I remember my teacher asking us about in 6th grade and I was the only person to figure out the answer in my class so I was a bit excited about seeing that one lol.
What if the guy from the "suicide" jumped from the ROOF and not the window. There was no statement saying access wasn't possible, so yea, it still could've been suicide :/
Edit: thankyou for the likes! Haha, it makes me feel smart lol :)
indeed
Kitten Lyric good point!!
Nice!!
And that bicycle thing, the construction is hollow. He could have put something in there.
Maia Ashes very true indeed
So the guy was shot dead and then closed the roof on his convertible? makes sense
Drum bum yeah I thought someone was in the car with him but apparently not
+Drum bum exactly
Actually some convertible are controlled by sound so it would open after the gunshot and close back up automatically
William Hathaway ...what? The convertible’s roof was open before the gunshot. No way could it open as soon as the gunshot sound was detected, as you claim. Those things take a couple seconds to open/close.
And really, convertible roofs automatically open to loud sounds? Why?
+William Hathaway by the these "sounds" are usually human voices and not those loud gunshots
I thought that the "suspicious man" in "number 9" was suspicious because he walked in the direction of the elevators after mixing up the rooms. That wouldn't make sense if he thought that 'her room' were 'his room.' He probably would've at least known what floor he was on; and only got the specific room on that floor mixed up. Right?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
same
You gotta look at the perspective in both the victims and murders eyes. Think like them.
It was both that AND knocking on the door
Gorgeousklutz98 Kad: She called the police because he had knocked on his own door, and that wouldn't make any logical sense because there's no reason to knock on your own door. I realize this. I was just stating my thought process before I knew the answer.
Tippy - san : It could make sense actually to knock at his own door. Let's say he could have been at the hotel with his wife (mistress) and forgot his key inside the room, so he knocks for his wife to open. Seeing it's not his wife, he realizes that he got the wrong room.
In the 9th riddle, even if the woman couldn't think of that knocking (normal people usually don't care) anyone could be suspicious about why the man would take the elevator if he thought it was his room as people normally get confused with adjacent rooms....
If u agree hit the like button!!
That’s what I’d thought too!
My only complaint is that the instructions stated to watch the riddle, which implied that the video was important. However, the video played no role, it was purely contextual clues within the wording of the riddle. This leads to the problem of Riddle #7 "Ice Tea". The video shows 6 glasses with none containing ice. They state the poison is contained within the ice. I can only assume the ice was in the pitcher, as the glasses clearly only contain tea, no ice visualized. This means that the pitcher's ice would melt, causing the poison to leak into the drink, so that the girl who is drinking quicker would actually have the higher risk of poison.
The riddle, when accompanied with the video, becomes unsolvable, as the video lies about the content of the glasses. We could assume that the two women would have ice in their ice tea, however, what we're shown is that they are not, so the answer makes no sense.
Otherwise, the riddles are fine... some force you to make assumptions. The bicycle smuggler, for example, could have been smuggling clothing, such as the hat he proudly flaunts, he could also be smuggling the sand himself, leading customs to believe that it's an item within the sand, not the sand itself.
Jonathan Chute I agree. Some of the visuals to represent the Riddle don't match up with the riddle themselves. The building suicide one and the ice tea one are the best examples since something is mentioned in the answers that isn't shown in the visuals.
I think the video helped in some way. The car one, I guessed the answer based on the picture, which was a convertible. And my answer for the court room came to me when I noticed the defendant had his dead down slightly. Made me re-read the text and gave away the answer.
I do agree some if the pictures can be misleading. But you can't rely entirely on the pictures if the information in the narration is enough. For example the building suicide narration gave plenty info as to how he solved the case, the visual was not needed. Where as the ice tea one you can assume using deductive reasoning that the ice was not in the pitcher because that would mean the girl who drank more would be poisened. So that means the ice had to be in the glasses and from there it's history.
this video rigged
I rewatched the video so I can get all the answers right and feel smart
mario LOL
well then you are self conscious of being suddenly criticized for not being smart.
*Rewatches video*
*Still gets the answers wrong*
Cheat
mario you ain’t smert
dude, so you never give enough information
That's the point, he only gives the information that the detective would know when first entering the crime scene.
lillian king he is giving less than the detective has for example during the car one ,we don't know what type of car he has, but a detective would
William Armstrong i think the car one (get shot in the car, but theres no bullet hole anywhere), the type of the car was inform in the picture
The cup of coffee one had different answers, and not information. Like wouldn't she see the fly while mixing or putting sugar in her drink? I said because she already drank out of it and they didn't refill it.
Yeah I thought of lipstick as well. Like there are a few answers to the coffee one
These bright side video make me think I m Sherlock Holmes 🤣🤣
Death in the car: The car door could have also been open when the man was shot, then locked and closed afterwards.
yeah
Or the person was shot by someone inside the car.
My car doors lock automatic after 2 min, even if key is in the igniction.
Or he could have been shot outside of the car and died trying to get to the hospital
@@celam1095 exatcly my thought
not enough detail. You need to be more specific or we cant figure out the riddles.
Ziadus that's why it's called a riddle
it doesn't make sense
Bryce Cravens i would not call these a riddle. Riddles are usually complex but have a logical solution contained within the riddle itself. Questions here are vague and do not give you any logical solution within the text. For example, Riddles are like figuring out that two plus two is four. Whereas these questions give you the number four, then you have to play a guessing game if the rest was either two times two or one times four.
With certain ones, there were things that could be assumed if other ways of solving it or just not enough to have a conclusion
no...for example the tea one never mentioned the sugar....they could have just said "the lady then put some sugar in her drink and drank blah blah blah but then saw a fly"
For number 9, I thought it was because the man walked to the elevators instead of checking another door.
Same
wheeZy me too
wheeZy me too
i thought it was both
Me to
Some of these riddles have multiple plausible answers.
SPOILER
ALERT
For example, look at riddle #5 (Fly in coffee) @6:06. The answer is that "she already put sugar in her previous cup of coffee". The riddle never mentioned sugar before that. The riddle could have said "she noticed a fly in her sweetened coffee", but it didn't. The riddle never mentions sugar. How are we supposed to assume she puts sugar in her coffee? It is also possible that the woman knew it was her cup of coffee because she had a lipstick stain on the rim of the cup of coffee. Neither sugar nor lipstick was mentioned in the riddle and both would be a reasonable guess.
Yes
For number 2 i thought it would have been because he went straight to the elevator instead of going to another room
MobdishGaming me too
Same here🤔
That's was literally what I said in my mind
I thought that too
That's what I thought at first but then realised that knocking was more of a giveaway since the hotel could have multiple floors with rooms.
another answer for the last cassette riddle is that if a person killed themselves, they wouldn't be able to stop the recording because they are dead
Isabel Song yes that's exactly what I was thinking!!
Tape recordings stop automatically when they run out of tape.
That is also what I thought
The gun shot sound was heard in the recording
Also, the gun would be on the floor, basic forensics.
Bad communication is all that they’ve given us
Lucy Rouxel no it's it's your just dumb
P.O .S it isn’t, require you to look at the picture and some don’t. Like the convertible one, I didn’t get that cause I didn’t think I was meant to use to picture, when on the others I didn’t need to
No you think outside the boxe
P.O .S did you not read what I put?
He's a p.o.s. He can't read.
10:18 the voice says suspected but the word says suspended😂
6. Makes no sense what so ever, if he says the doors were locked, that means the roof was closed too, you CANNOT open/close it if the car is locked...
Also, 5 and others have various answers for example because the coffee wasn’t as hot as the previous, also, who puts sugar in if you clearly see a dead bug in it?
2. Could have been because the gun was placed on the desk in a position that wouldn’t be possible if he shot himself
also #2 I said because it was a womans voice or another persons voice on the tape recorder.....that could have also been right.....there were more than 1 right answer for the 'riddles' so it was kinda dumb.
And in 1, how was i supposed to figure out that they didn't tell him where the crime scene was?Nothing like that was implied it just says "they informed him that his wife had been killed and he had to arrive at the crime scene right away" or I'm just dumb and I don't understand a thing...also there was probably blood in his car so I thought this was the reason he was suspected..
A more plausible scenario for number 6 is that the guy was shot and managed to crawl away to his car and lock himself in (to feel safer) but bled to death before he could drive to get help
The tape recorder was recording long enough to capture the sound of the gunshot. At that point we can assume the man is dead. The tape recorder would then continue to record until it reached the end of the tape. At that time it may have rewound itself as many tape recorders/players used to do.
jhitt79 yes but how did it stop straight after the gunshot answer me this my friend
A Person it doesn't say it stops right after the shot.
Winston Lee define "laying perfectly" who's to say it didn't fall out of his hand and just land that way? If it was pointed any other way you could still say it was perfect on the table.
jhitt79
Unless the man was very close to the table, there is no way a heavy object like a gun would fall on the table and stay there.
And the tape probably ended in the gun shot, or else the detective would've taken that in account.
Yisus he was close to the table, perhaps you didn't notice he was sitting right at it. Why would the gunshot stop the recording? I'm not saying I'm right, or that their is only one possibility, but people here don't seem to have any critical thinking skills.
#4 everyone looks at the door
later: the man does not look at the door
me: 🤦♂️
Tornado2D ikr
his wife doesn't come
it means she was killed
but by whom ??
The Badali him(husband)
I Love You Brightside!! 🌞❤
Who tf smuggles bicycles?
BlazterKing lol 😂 I know, right ?
The man on the riddle.
JUST THAT MAN. THIS IS SO RIDICULOUS.
@@___asdfghjkl6885 hahahahhahahhaa.....its just a riddle 😂😂
*ABicycleSmuggler* 😂
The hotel room: the reason it's suspicious is because he's headed back to the elevator, not because he knocked. Happens all the time: Two people stay at the same room, then one leaves for some brief errand and doesn't bring a key because the other person is staying behind. When he returns, he obviously knocks. But if you honestly make a mistake coming back, you then try the next door - not the next floor.
but you can accidentally get off on the wrong floor
Gilmaris I thought the same
Yes, you can accidentally get off on the wrong floor, but that is not normally your first instinct. If I accidentally had the wrong room, my first action would be to check the room number on the door - that would tell me if I mistook the room on the same floor, or got the wrong floor entirely. But the guy in the story apparently made for the elevator post-haste, without even checking.
This.
That was my reasoning since someone else could've been in the man's room as well.
Number 6 how did the roof get up again?
Taifun yep that's y my answer was because the killer put his body inside the car or he tried escaping after he got shot
I thought the same thing. My initial instinct was that he was shot somewhere else and got in the car as an attempt to escape or get to the hospital...
Taifun yes i know my guess was it was somthing else not a gun like a container of something in the car not a gun
he was being targeted as he pressed whatever button brings it up. as it was going up he was shot and killed, the roof continuing to close by itself as ordered.
me too
5:12
Me who eats the ice after:
* sweats nervously *
Ok if everyone in the room looked at the door then how would they know the killer didn’t look at the door🤔 cause they’re all paying attention to the door and not what the killer is doing.
But camras....🤔🤔🤔
Mano Khan
Not only that but they say clearly that EVERYONE in the room looked at the door
You see, I thought that she knew because her coffee wasn't as hot anymore. Or there was a fly wing in it.
Not only that, what if he was aware of the lawyers plan? Maybe he told him before about it, they usually talk about their defense plan BEFORE going to court sooo that is no argument even if they would have mentioned that he didn't look at the door
But bright side is paying attention 😛
If he smuggles bicycles across the border (which, by the way, is an absolutely ridiculous thing to smuggle), how does he get back over to smuggle the next one?
i just assumed it was the same bike he used, as any resonable person would assume
But then what's the point of smuggling it? The whole point of a smuggle - nay, the definition of a smuggle - is to get it from one side of a border to the other without the authorities being aware of it. So he can't be using the same bike.
no i mean, while trying to think about the riddle, i didnt think about the bike bc i was just assuming he was using the same bike
And since when are Mexican bikes illegal?
if he had brought a whole bunch of bikes together they would make him pay duty, so he brought them 1 by 1, and since it was considered his personal vehicle then they can't make him pay for it
I got a lot of these👌🏼. Some of them didn’t have enough detail therefore could have had multiple options tho
Heidi Scouten that’s how this riddles win
I got 5
ikr
Right!? I ended up getting a lot wrong because I had a different idea I was confident about that could probably work. In the end I got 2/10 exactly right.