National treasure was better because it romanticised history and the characters revered it... Unchartered was more like oceans heist film. No reverence for it's in world history.
It's astonishing how pixels, voice actors and motion capture conveys so much more energy, emotion and life than actual live action actors. Yeah they're only as good as the script and directing, but even if it was more faithful, I just don't believe Tom and Mark couldve ever nailed the dynamic chemistry that Nathan and Sully have
I feel like Tom could have nailed the character if he did a bit of research. He plays Spider-Man who's already a clever quippy character. . . I just feel like Mark did a terrible job being something for Tom to play off as a fellow actor on stage and also the fact that a lot of the writing for this movie didn't make a lot of sense. Nathan and Sully's meeting should have 100% been Nathan pickpocketing Sully 😅
From the jokes to the witty banter and even small touches like Nate's slight rambling or the one camera angle before the fire fight Whoda thunk making something with a bit of passion would make such a difference
Honestly, the closest you will come to the Uncharted feel in a movie is in Adventures of Tintin. It's got crazy action and a great partnership between the leads, as well as that adventure feel
OMG I REMEMBER WATCHING THAT MOVIE SO MANY TIMES! And you're totally right too, That movie has more of a Uncharted Feel than This "Uncharted Movie" Tintin and The Captain feel more Like Nate and Sully to me Than Tom and Mark
One of the main problems with almost all video game movies is they feel that they need to always make it an origin story. The games never give a background in the begin, NAte in the games is an experienced wise cracking treasure hunter. The movie waists its time having everyone meet for the first time and Nate being a newby
They either do an origin story or try to remake the game in movie form. It makes more sense instead to do a whole knew story that the game didn't show. Game movies should function almost as a new dlc, rather than generic predictable origin
I bet they looked at movies similar to Uncharted, like National Treasure, and made the movies similar to that because they believed Uncharted’s story couldn’t bring in an audience or some other corporate nonsense.
@@marcopoloonpollo5937 damn right on that. I think Tom and Mark are decent enough actors on their own But as Nate and Sully?! Tom has nowhere near the charisma needed and Mark is Mark
They definitely played the game. You couldn’t avoid the tone, characters, feel and action of the games if you never played them at least once each. It took work to make this film as soulless and garbage as possible
Not just Nate and Sully. But CHLOE'S character was also changed to be flatter! In the games, she wanted to find an ancient city that her father had tried to find years prior, whereas, in the movie, her father was just a lazy drunk who pawned off an artifact that she found for drinking money!
Also Nate and her are always flirting with each other in Uncharted 2. For a movie that predates the first game (Elena isn't even in the picture), that aspect of thier relationship is completely ignored.
@@emmanueldavis1872 how in theeeeee blue hell did they even think to make tom holland as drake, like how does that even make any damm sense, if anything it should have been mark for nathan and for sully a big chunky white guy that sounds like the reall sully, in telling you they butchered this shit 😡
Well, Sony Pictures is not that far removed from Disney in terms of varying quality between their movies. I remember how in the leaked e-mails from the 2014 Sony Hack some people in the studio felt that their movies were seen as bland and unappealing compared to their competitors. I mean Sony and Columbia Pictures earned a certain reputation for making all those awful Adam Sandler comedies, all of the meddling regarding the Amazing Spider-Man duology and how badly they treated directors and actors. They occasionally make some amazing movies like Spider-Verse and Mitchell's Against the Machines, but they also made things like The Emoji Movie, Venom 1 & 2 and Morbius
This is what they always do. I guarantee if TLOU was a movie it would be the same. They're just in it for the money, there's no passion for the game, they just want to appeal to a broad target audience, not satisfy the fans of the game
I remember seeing Tom get Nate's role and everyone collectively just went "Nathan Fillion???? Literally the PERFECT REPRESENTATION???" It's nothing against Tom, he has his own great roles like Spiderman. This just wasn't it
@@Ceasefirerightnow I feel you buddy! but about Nathan Fillion...Let's find someone else. That guy is too old for this character and even for him, I couldn't see Nathan in him too.
As an Uncharted fan I refused to see the movie because Tom Holland can't play Nathan Drake and Mark Wahlberg can't play Sully. The worst casting decisions I've seen in a long time.
Honestly, Tom just about pulls it off because he's got that cheeky humour down to a T. I would've preferred someone else, but he did the role justice anyway. Made me like Tom Holland more. Mark Wahlberg as Sully was just wrong. There was just nothing Sullivan about him. He didn't do the role any justice. He was not the right casting in any reality. The girl who played Chloe wasn't bad at all.
It devastated me when they didn’t take the Nathan Fillion short further. It was a great opportunity to follow the narrative of the forth game due to Fillions age. It should have been Nate’s daughter discovering her dad’s journal, going to look for the treasure possibly with a friend, getting into trouble and Nate and Sully teaming up to save them. It almost writes itself haha.
That would’ve been perfect since us fans are familiar with Nate’s daughter appearing in the Uncharted 4. Either they missed a huge opportunity OR they may be planning to use that story on a new game instead 👀
@@knurdyobYou cast him as an older, more seasoned Nathan Drake. That's all there is to it. You set your timeline a few years after the fourth game, and you're set. I don't see the problem there.
Yeah that was the best fan film I had ever seen, the production quality was up there with any streaming platformed series. Sucks it was only 15 minutes long
They have even rewritten Sams death and betrayal. His death became a claim and post-credit scene and his betrayal was done by Sully. Nathans father figure who never would backstab him. It's truly amazing how they manage to tank this story and charakteres...
@@adoptedbyangelinajolie meh, not so sure about that. putting aside that he is more of a writer instead of director, the least they can do is get someone who actually plays the game and watches the cutscene lol. let neil handles a way bigger plate (Part II👀) for now.
@@zack8865 Lol exactly what i was thinking. The only thing they can do is just start over, do a quick montage like the start of Evil Dead 2 "hahah remember this well it didnt happen but also it did and were doing it again" Except the problem with that is they still have the miscasting problem and big actor contracts involved. Im sure their agents negotiated for a multi picture deal. Any chance for a do over or even sequel is stuck in limbo probably forever.
I freaking loved seeing how nate didnt know how to play crash. It always reminds us how he had a rough life and couldnt afford to sit and play always had to move and survive
I worked on a bit of the short film and can confirm everybody involved cared about the source material, beginning with Nathan Fillion. We still talk about the stunt rig to get the over the shoulder shots of Nate jumping around. The feature didn't care about the characters or the fact that they came from a video game.
I'm a massive fan of Uncharted and there's nothing anyone can do to get me to watch this film. For me, the Nathan Fillion fan film is the only real Uncharted movie.
As soon as I walked out of the theater I said the following thing… “god that short in RUclips was 100 times better than this expensive movie” I’m a huge fan of the Uncharted series, I went as far as naming my first born Nathan, after of course Nathan Drake, and I absolutely hate the movie that Sony put out. Hopefully they reconsider and go the same route TLOU went.
I love that you didn't keep these thoughts inside and just yelled them instead😂😂. I understand tho, cuz the movie was a huge disappointment and Tom Holland was just not it, there is no resemblance between him and Nathan whatsoever, they should have had a better storyline with a cast that looks similar to the characters
I have always been a Nathan Fillion fan, and his fan film elevated that for me. If be more than fine if HBO were to pick it up as a show and cast him. The Last of Us really proved to be quality.
Didn't care for the last of us HBO series. The game is one of my all time favorites but they really butchered it. They put too much social warrior garbage in it like a whole episode on bill being gay, Joel having an interracial child and tommy having an African American wife to name a few. They seemed to care too much about cramming social agendas in there.
HBOs The Last of Us is quality? Generic polished 2 dimensional adaptation with nothing what made the game a masterpiece, just like this movie. If that's what considered quality then we are doomed.
I honestly think Tom could have been a really good Nathan Drake… in 5-10 years from now. He’s too young now and the idea that Mark Wahlberg played Sully should have never left the casting office.
Mark was originally going to play Nate but development hell and delays eventually made him get Sully instead as he got older. Interesting and kinda laughable
I remember watching the trailer and being excited, in fact that’s what made me want to play the games. I then binged playing all 5 games and when the movie came out I was a little underwhelmed. Uncharted became one of my favorite Videogame franchise ever and while I enjoyed the movie to an extent, it left a lot to be desired.
My wife & I decided to watch the Mummy with Brendan Fraser after not seeing it for a long time. After going through much nostalgia, I realized how perfect Brenden would play a witty Nathan Drake. He has the whole get up in the Mummy. He has the sarcasm wittiness & everything. I always felt Mark Wahlberg or Tom Cruise had the Drake vibe too.
Nathan Fillion´s fan film is perfection, in my head a perfect movie is set after U4 respecting all canon and to avoid jerks who complain that Fillion is too old, with Sam, Elena ,Cassie and Sully on a family adventure, cameos from Chloe and Charlie Cutter, epic new setpieces ala mission impossible instead of ripping from the games, Nate avoiding killing spree to be an example for Cassie but with clever funny ways to dispose them and the villain will be Eddy Raja´s long lost brother never mentioned before because why not but we got Marky Mark and Spidey-nate because he´s so hot right now
Why do you want to stuff the film with cameos of characters that are utterly meaningless to the target audience? Just do a decent story that introduces Nathan, Elena, and Sully to the mainstream audience, and if it does well you can introduce some more characers in the sequel. What you really don't want to do is make a sequel to the latest game as your first movie that's not going to make sense to people who haven'r played those games (as in 90+% of your audience if you want to make money of this thing).
In the commercials for this movie I noticed something was off, but I was still excited. It wasn't until I saw small video with Holland and Wahlberg talking up the movie where the lack of chemistry was so obvious that I decided not to pay theater prices. After hearing the reviews, I feel like I made the correct choice, and I still haven't seen it to this day
U could just tell that there was no real love put into it. Climbing is such a huge part of the gaming franchise, so how about while climbing, a stone that nate is grabbing onto starts to fall apart and so he has to move on quickly? Or while climbing, the thing just breaks off immediately and he falls down? These r small things u couldve added cuz its part of the franchise but nope. But what really really pissed me off was what they did to sully. In the games, its clear that sully would never betray nate and would give his life for him (elena mentions this too in the third game i believe). In the film at one point, tom holland asks if mark walhberg was really just gon leave with the treasure/let him die or straight up betray him (dont remember what the exact scenario was), and mark walhbergs sully just goes "yeah". Like its the complete opposite of what game sully is like. He would never ever betray him and would do anything for him, and here he just casually admits that he was ready to abandon/betray him like its nothing. Theres "doing things slightly different from the source material" and then theres this, which is called "to hell with the source material and what the character stands for, lets just butcher it".
Also, where were the puzzles? I know there was that one really shitty one. The game studio could come up with multiple fun and smart and interesting puzzles for each game but a big ass film studio couldnt even come up with one? Again, just a complete lack of love.
The best uncharted movie is the Minisode that Nathan Fillion did. His humour style is a perfect Nathan Drake. I highly recommend you look it up. Edit: Oh look its mentioned in this video. 7:47 that's what happens when you comment before completing. Guess I've got to work on my premature injection.
Yea that was the best. The fact that these clowns that made the movie ignored a PERFECT blueprint for a full movie and instead went with Spiderboy and Mark Wahlberg shows us that these people have no idea what they are doing.
Uncharted for me is very nostalgic because I remember that uncharted was my first T rated game I remember renting it from BLOCKBUSTER and being so amazed at the graphics at the time they where out of this world and then I bought it and man waking up at 2:30 on a Friday was amazing I was so intrigued by the story
I watched this with a group of friends who have never played the games. The consensus afterwards was that it was a fun but forgettable adventure film. It certainly didn't inspire anyone to check out the game series. I was the only one really disappointed, and yet I couldn't explain why to people who don't know these characters like I do. A missed opportunity IMO
This video sums it up so well. This is my favorite game franchise and I knew once they casted big name actors for the sake of popularity rather than actors that would be more true to the characters in the game, like in the case of that 2018 fan film, that we were in trouble. There is a chance that a sequel in the future if given the proper treatment could be better and more true to the source material, especially since they sort of set it up for one in the post credits scene, but I’m not holding my breath.
Tom Holland is a good Spiderman, there's no doubt about that. but in this movie it looked like he wasn't too much into it, his performance seemed like he was just tired, or just getting a movie out of his Sony contract out of the way. it's also hard to to see him as the MAIN character when Mark Wahlberg is right there, and didn't seem like he knew how to act out the "side character" role. this movie needed someone a little bit older, or someone who looked older to play the main characters role.
"He's a good spiderman" that's debatable. I have nothing against Tom Holland, but I have a hard time seeing him as Peter Parker. Peter isn't some shy, reserved, scaredy-cat, he's an instigator, and a trash-talker, who can come off as a bit of a jerk sometimes.
@@Utonian21I’ve felt that way forever, it’s good to see someone else does too. MCU Peter Parker is an audience insert, I think Holland COULD be fine but he’s written into and plays too far into a bit of a ditz or starstruck character honestly. Peter is a lot of great things, he is selfless, he is witty, he is kind and giving. But a lot of his most positive attributes are balanced or a cope against all the pressure he constantly faces in his personal, professional, and secret lives. It gets old to see comedic levels of misery inflicted on him, but at some point he’s been through so much tragedy on its own that it defines his response because above all he holds himself to the standard of having great responsibility. Making him some lighthearted goofball misses a lot of that nuance. And I don’t think the MCU Peter had it easy or never experienced tragedy, but their characterization of him did a lot to avoid implying it. The Maguire and Garfield versions were much closer in terms of conveying that their personalities were a response to the pressures they felt. You look at Spider-Man in ultimate alliance, the 90s cartoon, the comics, all these other versions that helped define the character and he’s if anything a bit wary and suspicious of other heroes. He is a small town guy who looks out for the people the big heroes miss. He isn’t afraid to snark or throw down with the likes of Iron Man and Wolverine. He gets a lot of respect from the hero community, rightfully so, but he’s not trotting around making best friends day 1. I think what makes it most disappointing for me is how phase 1 made the potential of seeing these comic characters fully realized in a convincing way more tangible, and by the time Spider-Man had come around the movies felt basically like chores that would print the money whatever happened in the movie. I do think no way home is the closest Holland came to feeling like how I envision Peter Parker, and the great part about that was how it happened after iron man died and the original avengers were disbanded and all, entirely eliminating the chance to see the accurate interactions of these characters on the big screen on the first try. I personally think Peter needed to be an established hero already in his early to mid adult years by the time civil war rolled around
I got to meet Nolan north a few months ago and talked about his video game roles and of corse brought up his cameo in the uncharted movie. He said he would love to be a reoccurring character if more sequels are made and also that his brother was surprised to see him in the movie
It could have been a trilogy of movies staring a young Tom holland as a young Nathan drake in flash backs. With an actor at least 12 years older playing Nathan drake in the present.
When I heard the casting I think everyone knew this wasn’t going to work. Honestly thought it was going to cover his younger years set before the games.
Nathan Fillion got absolutely shafted being ousted after putting that amazing short together with his own money. Sony’s Uncharted movie is a perfect example of trying make as much money as possible at the expense of the source material.
Wild! My wife and I literally just watched this movie last night and i came out feeling the exact same. Where was the relationship between Sully and Nate!
It doesn't help that the script went through several iterations that seemed to only see "Among Thieves" in Uncharted 2's title and decide that the franchise must mean everyone is out to get each other at all times
This movie wasn’t bad, but it definitely wasn’t good. Always good to see adaptation productions take source material from the source tho, like in this movie
It was all about putting high celebrity status actors as opposed to recognizing heart. What makes the product special in the eyes of the fans…They want to play it safe…
I think biggest problem is that Tom Holland and Mark Walberg don't feel like Nathan Drake and Victor Sullivan. They feel like Tom Holland and Mark Walberg.
When I first saw a trailer for the movie, I thought Tom looked like an excellent young Nathan and looked like a good casting compared to the game...then I realized he's meant to be the modern day Nathan..
Tom Holland and Mark Wahlberg are not bad actors at all, they're just aren't fit to play these specific characters. Tom feels a bit too young and doesn't really feel like he has the personality of Nathan Drake, same thing with Mark as Sully.
Nate and sully cracking jokes of past adventurers or even ones we went on with them is always a favourite little moment. I don't think the people who made the movie actually played through all the games and they should have. The relationship sully and Nate have or even sam and sully have is incredible it's obvious how long though have known each other and the movie makes it out like its just some guy he met as a adult and decided to work with because he mentioned his brother's name. Sully in the games knows about Sam prior to you getting him back in the 4th game and that's accurate because sully knew about Sam since he first met Nate but in the movie they make it out as they used the be freinds and they worded together.
I remember when this movie was in the making and I said probably one of the best casting options for Nathan Drake was Zac Efron, he's around the right age and has that look, but then I said "they'll probably just go with the popular route and cast like Tom Holland" .........I never hated hated being right so much
I really saw what the director was trying to do. In some parts of the film, I could clearly see how they basically redid some scenes from all of the uncharted games, but redid it in a way to be put in the game and could easily have not been pointed out. For Example: 1. There was a scene where Nate And Chloe where looking up in the sewer in the movie, and had some mechanics, that looked like the scene in Uncharted 4 where the camera aimed up, at the clock tower. 2: The ending scene of the ships, reminded of the first game, where the helicopter took the statue in El Dorado up in the sky, but in this instant, it was the ships and the ships reminded of Uncharted 4 There are more comparrisions i’d share of what I thought, but i’d be too long of a paragraph, but just playing Uncharted series a million times, I know in the movie, they switched things up in a different perspective but somewhat recreated the games, tho it changed a major in characters, locations, viewpoints. I believe they are trying to recreate the whole movie as the games story, but this means a whole different perspective
Could someone who has seen the film explain why Sully and Nate completely destroyed Magellan's ships? And also what was at stake at that point? I might be misremembering....but who cares if the mercenaries get the ships? Surely that's a better scenario than completely destroying them "if we can't have them, nobody can!".... I must have missed something... one minute they're on a treasure hunt, the next minute they're smashing the ships into rockfaces. I still don't get why Nate or Sully tried to prevent the mercenaries from excavating the ships by completely destroying them. Most people would have just shrugged or hid until they landed and tried to sneak away. Instead they wreck the ships when an already heavily funded mercenary group has successfully retrieved them. I dont get it. Was there any point to it,?
The other part that hurt the movie in the eyes of fans, even if it was does entirely to keep a lower rating than a hard R, was how tame the violence was in the action scenes. In addition to the characters not feeling at all like their video game counterparts in anyway except name the action scenes also felt flat. In the games Nathan is no stranger to going full John Wick (or, should we say, John Wick goes full Nathan Drake?) on hordes of enemies while also completing these insane acrobatic stunts to get through a complicated environment. Not only would that not be believable for Tom Holland to do but removing those entirely changes the nature of how movie Nathan works in his world.
Why did they not adapt the fan film on RUclips made with Nathan Fillion and Stephen Lang who look and act exactly as their counterparts, and it is so excellent - I wish that Hollywood had as much passion and drive as they did.
Nathan and Sully’s first meeting in game is so much like the dynamic between a young Indiana Jones and the treasure hunter who gives Indy his hat in The Last Crusade.
I wonder if the game creators or movies studios actually care of even try to learn lessons to avoid ruining the awesomeness and nostalgia that audience has developed with the original work
This was so spot on. Exactly how I remember feeling when leaving the theater. The characters were vapid and one dimensional and had none of their charm or charisma from the games. I remember being really disappointed at the dynamic between Nate and Sully. They didn't trust each other the whole movie, yet in the games, Nate trusts Sully more than anyone.
Not to mention that the "Magellan's Treasure" plot of Nathan Fillion's Uncharted Fan FIlm was stolen and used in Uncharted. I was actually happy with Tom Holland taking the mantle because he at least resembles young Nate in Uncharted 3 and 4 in the flashback chapters which I thought they were going to use. Instead, like what you said, went FLAT. They could have used both Tom Holland as the young Nate, stories being told by the older wiser Nate cast as Nathan Fillion telling his daughter Cassie as if it was the postlude of Uncharted 4. Come on, Nathan Fillion freaking nails it as Nathan Drake! The intelligent nerd mumblings and gigglings over historical myths, he definitely brought Nate to life.
Let me put ot this way, i enjoyed this ten minute video more overall and probably for a longer duration of time than everything I liked in the movie combined.
As a kid before i even played uncharted (started playing it now in my adult years) i akways thought tom cruise would be a perfect fit. But i guess he's too old now
I think Tom Cruise would actually be a good Nathan Drake if they started making the movies 10 years ago. I think in the Mission Impossible series he really sells the “making the most of out of a no-win situation” that Drake showcases time and time again
I just dont understand why they dont get the writers of the game into the movie production, or even be main directors of it with the help of movie directors
The part that I CAN'T get over is how bad that first chase scene with Nate and Chloe went. Tom was giving his all to the camera and pulled off some decent looking moves, while Chloe had a basic run and would clumsily get by simple obstacles. It was laughably bad to see them cut back to back like that.
Nathan Fillion looks almost exactly like Nathan Drake from Uncharted 4 I thought the game's Nathan was modeled after Nathan Fillion he would've been a better choice for the movie
THING IS it IS though..... it tells its story EXACTLUY how the games do, they start you off in the middle of crazy action only for something dramatic to happen that causes a flashback, to the actual begining of the story, and then the whole story is told up to and including the part we already saw/played, only for it to keep going and progress to the third and final act of the story. NO OTHER GAME MOVIE has even TRIED to tell their stories in the same way the games do, and that ALONE makes it feel more like uncharted than anything else they could have done. including but not limited to forcing markey mark to grow a mustache.
I’m a big fan of the uncharted franchise I was excited for this movie when I saw the movie I thought it was cool but it could be a lot better I agree this isn’t a true uncharted film hopefully the second film will be better and introduce Elena fisher
You know what’s missing?… Charm. That’s what’s really missing in this movie. The charm that the cast and writers and directors of the games brought to these characters with pulpy lightness in tone. I could even go so far as to describe it as “wholesome”, in a way that’s just bubbling under joking, sarcastic banter. Not only was Mark badly cast (And I’m not sorry, Tom was a great cast for Nathan Drake, I don’t care what anyone says), but the writing just didn’t have that charm. And oh, the everyone’s just newly introduced to each other thing: not an excuse. The games had the feeling I’m describing even when the characters barely knew each other, like Nate and Elena in UC1 or Nate and Sully in the UC3 flashbacks. I’m pretty sure that the writers and director did not understand the games enough. The Last Of Us didn’t work so brilliantly because of anything innate, it worked because they paired a MEGAFAN and tv visionary Craig Mazin with the fucking guy who wrote and directed the games themselves, Neil Druckmann. Uncharted was doomed before it started. Because I can throw a few names out there that should have been involved hands on: Neil Druckmann (one of the directors and writers of the games), Josh Scherr (one of the writers), Bruce Straley (a director) and most of all Amy Hennig, who is to Uncharted what Neil is to The Last Of Us. If you think about it: Hiring the director of VENOM for this… eh… I don’t care that he did Zombieland, it ain’t Uncharted. If The Last Of Us proved anything, it’s that if you want it to be great, you need people who firmly understand the source material to the bone.
Massive fan of the games, I found this film really good, I think it was a great opener in my eyes so ready for the sequels, too many people want everything all at once these days with cinema, something's just require a build across a few movies
You knew it was gonna be a bad movie when mark wahlberg was casted as Victor Sullivan. Now, I like Wahlberg some of his roles (The Other Guys, The Family Man, Ted), but Sully is... not that. Same goes for Tom Holland. They're all fantastic actors that just made a shitty movie together
This movie felt more like a reboot of National Treasure than uncharted
At least it's better than the national treasure show disney came out with
damn that's exactly right
National treasure was better because it romanticised history and the characters revered it... Unchartered was more like oceans heist film. No reverence for it's in world history.
Yea it was really bad and didn't feel like uncharted at all. So dissapointing bc i really loved the game so much 😭
@@adoptedbyangelinajolie i love the games and i had fun with the movie
It's astonishing how pixels, voice actors and motion capture conveys so much more energy, emotion and life than actual live action actors. Yeah they're only as good as the script and directing, but even if it was more faithful, I just don't believe Tom and Mark couldve ever nailed the dynamic chemistry that Nathan and Sully have
They seriously need to remake this mess and do an hbo show out of it instead. It just doesn't work as an action blockbuster movie.
@@Ceasefirerightnow even tho it basically is just an interactive action adventure movie 😂
tom never even touched the games until after they started filming
I feel like Tom could have nailed the character if he did a bit of research. He plays Spider-Man who's already a clever quippy character. . . I just feel like Mark did a terrible job being something for Tom to play off as a fellow actor on stage and also the fact that a lot of the writing for this movie didn't make a lot of sense. Nathan and Sully's meeting should have 100% been Nathan pickpocketing Sully 😅
@@darkblade51224 Wahlberg is the same in every damn movie he does now. Abolutely terrible casting for Sully
The fan film with Nathan Fillion was way more true to heart than this movie was.
From the jokes to the witty banter and even small touches like Nate's slight rambling or the one camera angle before the fire fight
Whoda thunk making something with a bit of passion would make such a difference
Fan Film was incredible! I couldn't agree more
Fr
Nathan Fillion IS Nathan Drake. He looks just like him (a bit older version of him)
The uncharted character was based on Nathan Fillion.
Honestly, the closest you will come to the Uncharted feel in a movie is in Adventures of Tintin. It's got crazy action and a great partnership between the leads, as well as that adventure feel
OMG I REMEMBER WATCHING THAT MOVIE SO MANY TIMES! And you're totally right too, That movie has more of a Uncharted Feel than This "Uncharted Movie" Tintin and The Captain feel more Like Nate and Sully to me Than Tom and Mark
Dude, you are absolutely right
i’ve always said this🤣 that’s crazy. tintin had a mobile game that was really good too awhile ago
Comparing uncharted to tin tin came outta nowhere but im not gonna knock it 😹
@@noobidiot4628But that is true. If you watch the tin tin movie, it's just like uncharted except killing 1000 people and being okay with it
One of the main problems with almost all video game movies is they feel that they need to always make it an origin story. The games never give a background in the begin, NAte in the games is an experienced wise cracking treasure hunter. The movie waists its time having everyone meet for the first time and Nate being a newby
@@juubilo1509 "The games never give a background in the begin," is what he said. By Uncharted 3, Drake and Sully were already established characters.
They don't even touch Nate's origin until what, the third game? Then they expand more in the fourth? Yeah, I have to agree with you.
They either do an origin story or try to remake the game in movie form. It makes more sense instead to do a whole knew story that the game didn't show. Game movies should function almost as a new dlc, rather than generic predictable origin
I bet they looked at movies similar to Uncharted, like National Treasure, and made the movies similar to that because they believed Uncharted’s story couldn’t bring in an audience or some other corporate nonsense.
It's pretty hip to waist time
This is the most important thing. You need creators who 'care' about the source material.
The fan film did it infinitely better and barely even any of the run time
This one was just "look, we played the game too guys"
I don't think they even played the game, based on their casting choices.
@@marcopoloonpollo5937 damn right on that. I think Tom and Mark are decent enough actors on their own
But as Nate and Sully?! Tom has nowhere near the charisma needed and Mark is Mark
They definitely played the game. You couldn’t avoid the tone, characters, feel and action of the games if you never played them at least once each. It took work to make this film as soulless and garbage as possible
@@TheFlash-rh2el W comment
@@TheFlash-rh2el you almost had me
I applaud you
Not just Nate and Sully. But CHLOE'S character was also changed to be flatter! In the games, she wanted to find an ancient city that her father had tried to find years prior, whereas, in the movie, her father was just a lazy drunk who pawned off an artifact that she found for drinking money!
They butchered the entire film, the entire god dang thing, and I hear a second one is in production already 🤬
Also Nate and her are always flirting with each other in Uncharted 2. For a movie that predates the first game (Elena isn't even in the picture), that aspect of thier relationship is completely ignored.
I agree. I was thinking about that but didn't hear about anyone bringing it up until this comment. They changed Chloe and it wasn't for the better.
@@emmanueldavis1872 how in theeeeee blue hell did they even think to make tom holland as drake, like how does that even make any damm sense, if anything it should have been mark for nathan and for sully a big chunky white guy that sounds like the reall sully, in telling you they butchered this shit 😡
@@NathanDrake-h4l Yep, they sure did.
They definitely made it to safe. Felt like a Disney version.
I blame AVI ARAD
@@Zombiesnyder13 fr fuck him
Well, Sony Pictures is not that far removed from Disney in terms of varying quality between their movies. I remember how in the leaked e-mails from the 2014 Sony Hack some people in the studio felt that their movies were seen as bland and unappealing compared to their competitors. I mean Sony and Columbia Pictures earned a certain reputation for making all those awful Adam Sandler comedies, all of the meddling regarding the Amazing Spider-Man duology and how badly they treated directors and actors. They occasionally make some amazing movies like Spider-Verse and Mitchell's Against the Machines, but they also made things like The Emoji Movie, Venom 1 & 2 and Morbius
What did they do once they arrived at the safe?
This is what they always do. I guarantee if TLOU was a movie it would be the same. They're just in it for the money, there's no passion for the game, they just want to appeal to a broad target audience, not satisfy the fans of the game
I remember seeing Tom get Nate's role and everyone collectively just went "Nathan Fillion???? Literally the PERFECT REPRESENTATION???"
It's nothing against Tom, he has his own great roles like Spiderman. This just wasn't it
The whole time while watching the movie i only saw spiderman. I just couldn't see Nathan in him.
@@Ceasefirerightnow I feel you buddy! but about Nathan Fillion...Let's find someone else. That guy is too old for this character and even for him, I couldn't see Nathan in him too.
The Fillion film rocks. Stephen Lang as Sully is terrific.
@@VenkyBeastdid you watch the fan film?
@@VenkyBeastyeah too old. Cough Liam Neeson 😂😂😂
As an Uncharted fan I refused to see the movie because Tom Holland can't play Nathan Drake and Mark Wahlberg can't play Sully. The worst casting decisions I've seen in a long time.
Bruce Campbell for Sully?
Aggressively bad casting. And a lukewarm, anodyne CGI adventure that felt easy and safe. Made National Treasure look gritty by comparison.
It was unless they adopted the last game and only had tom play young Drake
@@DetectiveLance the best casting would definetly have been Nathan Fillion and Tom Hanks as Sully, I prayed for this 10 years ago and they ruined it
Honestly, Tom just about pulls it off because he's got that cheeky humour down to a T. I would've preferred someone else, but he did the role justice anyway. Made me like Tom Holland more.
Mark Wahlberg as Sully was just wrong. There was just nothing Sullivan about him. He didn't do the role any justice. He was not the right casting in any reality.
The girl who played Chloe wasn't bad at all.
6:46 My man is way too used to posing as Spider-Man
It devastated me when they didn’t take the Nathan Fillion short further. It was a great opportunity to follow the narrative of the forth game due to Fillions age. It should have been Nate’s daughter discovering her dad’s journal, going to look for the treasure possibly with a friend, getting into trouble and Nate and Sully teaming up to save them. It almost writes itself haha.
damn bro this would be so good
That would’ve been perfect since us fans are familiar with Nate’s daughter appearing in the Uncharted 4. Either they missed a huge opportunity OR they may be planning to use that story on a new game instead 👀
actually great idea! I always thought it's too late for Nathan Fillion to be cast as Nathan Drake but that idea actually makes a lot of sense.
@@knurdyobYou cast him as an older, more seasoned Nathan Drake. That's all there is to it.
You set your timeline a few years after the fourth game, and you're set. I don't see the problem there.
Yeah that was the best fan film I had ever seen, the production quality was up there with any streaming platformed series. Sucks it was only 15 minutes long
The RUclips version will forever be my version of Live Action Uncharted
They have even rewritten Sams death and betrayal. His death became a claim and post-credit scene and his betrayal was done by Sully. Nathans father figure who never would backstab him.
It's truly amazing how they manage to tank this story and charakteres...
seriously sully characterization is the worst offender of the movie.
We need to do a petition to remake this movie. This time directed by neil druckmann himself
@@adoptedbyangelinajolie meh, not so sure about that. putting aside that he is more of a writer instead of director, the least they can do is get someone who actually plays the game and watches the cutscene lol. let neil handles a way bigger plate (Part II👀) for now.
@@zumabbar they could always just Evil Dead 2 the franchise and start over. plus i think it's better as a tv series anyway
@@zack8865 Lol exactly what i was thinking. The only thing they can do is just start over, do a quick montage like the start of Evil Dead 2 "hahah remember this well it didnt happen but also it did and were doing it again" Except the problem with that is they still have the miscasting problem and big actor contracts involved. Im sure their agents negotiated for a multi picture deal. Any chance for a do over or even sequel is stuck in limbo probably forever.
Having Mark Wahlberg in an uncharted movie but not have him play Nathan Drake is baffling
I freaking loved seeing how nate didnt know how to play crash. It always reminds us how he had a rough life and couldnt afford to sit and play always had to move and survive
exactly
I don’t like the uncharted crash’s controls
It’s so hard 😩
He also has very distinct interests
I worked on a bit of the short film and can confirm everybody involved cared about the source material, beginning with Nathan Fillion. We still talk about the stunt rig to get the over the shoulder shots of Nate jumping around. The feature didn't care about the characters or the fact that they came from a video game.
I'm a massive fan of Uncharted and there's nothing anyone can do to get me to watch this film. For me, the Nathan Fillion fan film is the only real Uncharted movie.
A massive fan who watched it telling you: Good choice!
That fan made short with Nathan fillion was the greatest uncharted tribute ever!
As soon as I walked out of the theater I said the following thing… “god that short in RUclips was 100 times better than this expensive movie”
I’m a huge fan of the Uncharted series, I went as far as naming my first born Nathan, after of course Nathan Drake, and I absolutely hate the movie that Sony put out. Hopefully they reconsider and go the same route TLOU went.
Did you include Drake in their name as well 🤔
@@ss2jesus he changed his last name to it
I love that you didn't keep these thoughts inside and just yelled them instead😂😂. I understand tho, cuz the movie was a huge disappointment and Tom Holland was just not it, there is no resemblance between him and Nathan whatsoever, they should have had a better storyline with a cast that looks similar to the characters
Definately had the vibe of the White Collar series with greasy New York City characters.
Horrible casting. Tom Holland looks about 18, Nathan Drake is at least 30. Mark Wahlberg looks about 40, Sully is at least 50.
I have always been a Nathan Fillion fan, and his fan film elevated that for me. If be more than fine if HBO were to pick it up as a show and cast him. The Last of Us really proved to be quality.
Didn't care for the last of us HBO series. The game is one of my all time favorites but they really butchered it. They put too much social warrior garbage in it like a whole episode on bill being gay, Joel having an interracial child and tommy having an African American wife to name a few. They seemed to care too much about cramming social agendas in there.
@@tigerwoods373 ah, so you're a racist
HBOs The Last of Us is quality? Generic polished 2 dimensional adaptation with nothing what made the game a masterpiece, just like this movie. If that's what considered quality then we are doomed.
@@Houswal I'm glad I'm not the one who thought the series kind of sucked.
Yess exactly what i was thinking. Turning it into an hbo series
I honestly think Tom could have been a really good Nathan Drake… in 5-10 years from now. He’s too young now and the idea that Mark Wahlberg played Sully should have never left the casting office.
Mark was originally going to play Nate but development hell and delays eventually made him get Sully instead as he got older. Interesting and kinda laughable
I remember watching the trailer and being excited, in fact that’s what made me want to play the games. I then binged playing all 5 games and when the movie came out I was a little underwhelmed. Uncharted became one of my favorite Videogame franchise ever and while I enjoyed the movie to an extent, it left a lot to be desired.
I was so disappointed and bored shen i watched the movie 😭 they did uncharted dirty af
you liked the trailers? when i saw them i immediately knew the movie was not uncharted
@@BarkerVancityI saw the trailer before I played the games dog, after I played them I was trying to convince myself that it would be good 😭
My wife & I decided to watch the Mummy with Brendan Fraser after not seeing it for a long time.
After going through much nostalgia, I realized how perfect Brenden would play a witty Nathan Drake. He has the whole get up in the Mummy. He has the sarcasm wittiness & everything.
I always felt Mark Wahlberg or Tom Cruise had the Drake vibe too.
true, i could see (young) fraser play drake
Nathan Fillion´s fan film is perfection, in my head a perfect movie is set after U4 respecting all canon and to avoid jerks who complain that Fillion is too old, with Sam, Elena ,Cassie and Sully on a family adventure, cameos from Chloe and Charlie Cutter, epic new setpieces ala mission impossible instead of ripping from the games, Nate avoiding killing spree to be an example for Cassie but with clever funny ways to dispose them and the villain will be Eddy Raja´s long lost brother never mentioned before because why not
but we got Marky Mark and Spidey-nate because he´s so hot right now
Why do you want to stuff the film with cameos of characters that are utterly meaningless to the target audience?
Just do a decent story that introduces Nathan, Elena, and Sully to the mainstream audience, and if it does well you can introduce some more characers in the sequel.
What you really don't want to do is make a sequel to the latest game as your first movie that's not going to make sense to people who haven'r played those games (as in 90+% of your audience if you want to make money of this thing).
That sounds great & believable. I’d watch that
In the commercials for this movie I noticed something was off, but I was still excited. It wasn't until I saw small video with Holland and Wahlberg talking up the movie where the lack of chemistry was so obvious that I decided not to pay theater prices. After hearing the reviews, I feel like I made the correct choice, and I still haven't seen it to this day
You summed it up perfectly, explaining how those involved in making the film just didn't have a love for the source material.
U could just tell that there was no real love put into it. Climbing is such a huge part of the gaming franchise, so how about while climbing, a stone that nate is grabbing onto starts to fall apart and so he has to move on quickly? Or while climbing, the thing just breaks off immediately and he falls down? These r small things u couldve added cuz its part of the franchise but nope.
But what really really pissed me off was what they did to sully. In the games, its clear that sully would never betray nate and would give his life for him (elena mentions this too in the third game i believe).
In the film at one point, tom holland asks if mark walhberg was really just gon leave with the treasure/let him die or straight up betray him (dont remember what the exact scenario was), and mark walhbergs sully just goes "yeah".
Like its the complete opposite of what game sully is like. He would never ever betray him and would do anything for him, and here he just casually admits that he was ready to abandon/betray him like its nothing.
Theres "doing things slightly different from the source material" and then theres this, which is called "to hell with the source material and what the character stands for, lets just butcher it".
Also, where were the puzzles? I know there was that one really shitty one. The game studio could come up with multiple fun and smart and interesting puzzles for each game but a big ass film studio couldnt even come up with one? Again, just a complete lack of love.
The best uncharted movie is the Minisode that Nathan Fillion did. His humour style is a perfect Nathan Drake. I highly recommend you look it up.
Edit: Oh look its mentioned in this video. 7:47 that's what happens when you comment before completing. Guess I've got to work on my premature injection.
Check out the episode and our link in description!
Yea that was the best. The fact that these clowns that made the movie ignored a PERFECT blueprint for a full movie and instead went with Spiderboy and Mark Wahlberg shows us that these people have no idea what they are doing.
Uncharted for me is very nostalgic because I remember that uncharted was my first T rated game I remember renting it from BLOCKBUSTER and being so amazed at the graphics at the time they where out of this world and then I bought it and man waking up at 2:30 on a Friday was amazing I was so intrigued by the story
FINALLY someone said it! Glad you addressed this, Hollywood failed us with this one.
I watched this with a group of friends who have never played the games. The consensus afterwards was that it was a fun but forgettable adventure film. It certainly didn't inspire anyone to check out the game series. I was the only one really disappointed, and yet I couldn't explain why to people who don't know these characters like I do. A missed opportunity IMO
This video sums it up so well. This is my favorite game franchise and I knew once they casted big name actors for the sake of popularity rather than actors that would be more true to the characters in the game, like in the case of that 2018 fan film, that we were in trouble. There is a chance that a sequel in the future if given the proper treatment could be better and more true to the source material, especially since they sort of set it up for one in the post credits scene, but I’m not holding my breath.
Why can't they just remake the movie but with fillion. It's never too late :(
So far you are the only person I’ve seen make a video saying it wasn’t like the games… THANK YOU
Tom Holland is a good Spiderman, there's no doubt about that. but in this movie it looked like he wasn't too much into it, his performance seemed like he was just tired, or just getting a movie out of his Sony contract out of the way. it's also hard to to see him as the MAIN character when Mark Wahlberg is right there, and didn't seem like he knew how to act out the "side character" role. this movie needed someone a little bit older, or someone who looked older to play the main characters role.
Agreed. I like Tom Holland and all, but he’s waaaaay too young to be Nathan Drake.
"He's a good spiderman" that's debatable. I have nothing against Tom Holland, but I have a hard time seeing him as Peter Parker.
Peter isn't some shy, reserved, scaredy-cat, he's an instigator, and a trash-talker, who can come off as a bit of a jerk sometimes.
@LCThaDude In the movies, maybe. The whole point of Uncle Ben's death is that it humbled him
@@Utonian21I’ve felt that way forever, it’s good to see someone else does too. MCU Peter Parker is an audience insert, I think Holland COULD be fine but he’s written into and plays too far into a bit of a ditz or starstruck character honestly.
Peter is a lot of great things, he is selfless, he is witty, he is kind and giving. But a lot of his most positive attributes are balanced or a cope against all the pressure he constantly faces in his personal, professional, and secret lives. It gets old to see comedic levels of misery inflicted on him, but at some point he’s been through so much tragedy on its own that it defines his response because above all he holds himself to the standard of having great responsibility.
Making him some lighthearted goofball misses a lot of that nuance. And I don’t think the MCU Peter had it easy or never experienced tragedy, but their characterization of him did a lot to avoid implying it. The Maguire and Garfield versions were much closer in terms of conveying that their personalities were a response to the pressures they felt.
You look at Spider-Man in ultimate alliance, the 90s cartoon, the comics, all these other versions that helped define the character and he’s if anything a bit wary and suspicious of other heroes. He is a small town guy who looks out for the people the big heroes miss. He isn’t afraid to snark or throw down with the likes of Iron Man and Wolverine. He gets a lot of respect from the hero community, rightfully so, but he’s not trotting around making best friends day 1. I think what makes it most disappointing for me is how phase 1 made the potential of seeing these comic characters fully realized in a convincing way more tangible, and by the time Spider-Man had come around the movies felt basically like chores that would print the money whatever happened in the movie.
I do think no way home is the closest Holland came to feeling like how I envision Peter Parker, and the great part about that was how it happened after iron man died and the original avengers were disbanded and all, entirely eliminating the chance to see the accurate interactions of these characters on the big screen on the first try. I personally think Peter needed to be an established hero already in his early to mid adult years by the time civil war rolled around
I got to meet Nolan north a few months ago and talked about his video game roles and of corse brought up his cameo in the uncharted movie. He said he would love to be a reoccurring character if more sequels are made and also that his brother was surprised to see him in the movie
Watching Mark Wahlberg in any video game adaption evokes maximum pain for me.
Watching him in anything does the same for me.
@Aveteran Player the other guys is still one of my favorite movies ever. His acting is best when not taken seriously.
Mark Wahlberg did a good job in Ted and Ted 2. Enough said.
It evokes Max Payne for me as well
It could have been a trilogy of movies staring a young Tom holland as a young Nathan drake in flash backs. With an actor at least 12 years older playing Nathan drake in the present.
When I heard the casting I think everyone knew this wasn’t going to work. Honestly thought it was going to cover his younger years set before the games.
Nathan Fillion got absolutely shafted being ousted after putting that amazing short together with his own money.
Sony’s Uncharted movie is a perfect example of trying make as much money as possible at the expense of the source material.
Wild! My wife and I literally just watched this movie last night and i came out feeling the exact same. Where was the relationship between Sully and Nate!
Someone had to say it!!! Thank you so much for expressing what I've been thinking too since I saw the movie
It doesn't help that the script went through several iterations that seemed to only see "Among Thieves" in Uncharted 2's title and decide that the franchise must mean everyone is out to get each other at all times
Ironic how video games can feel like movies at times but movies very rarely know how to translate what made the video games so great to the screen.
Thanks for the fan film link !!! Love Nathan Fillion.
This movie wasn’t bad, but it definitely wasn’t good.
Always good to see adaptation productions take source material from the source tho, like in this movie
It was all about putting high celebrity status actors as opposed to recognizing heart. What makes the product special in the eyes of the fans…They want to play it safe…
I think biggest problem is that Tom Holland and Mark Walberg don't feel like Nathan Drake and Victor Sullivan. They feel like Tom Holland and Mark Walberg.
Nathan Fillion was brilliant as Nathan Drake in that fan film.
That's the Uncharted movie we all wanted
Yes Nathan fillion looks like him and he played good for the role of Drake but noooo they have to choose tom Holland
This movie feels more like a promotion for the games than an actual adaptation.
When I first saw a trailer for the movie, I thought Tom looked like an excellent young Nathan and looked like a good casting compared to the game...then I realized he's meant to be the modern day Nathan..
Tom Holland and Mark Wahlberg are not bad actors at all, they're just aren't fit to play these specific characters. Tom feels a bit too young and doesn't really feel like he has the personality of Nathan Drake, same thing with Mark as Sully.
Ruben Fleischer used to be a decent director
Now he's just another director for hire
Nate and sully cracking jokes of past adventurers or even ones we went on with them is always a favourite little moment. I don't think the people who made the movie actually played through all the games and they should have. The relationship sully and Nate have or even sam and sully have is incredible it's obvious how long though have known each other and the movie makes it out like its just some guy he met as a adult and decided to work with because he mentioned his brother's name. Sully in the games knows about Sam prior to you getting him back in the 4th game and that's accurate because sully knew about Sam since he first met Nate but in the movie they make it out as they used the be freinds and they worded together.
I remember when this movie was in the making and I said probably one of the best casting options for Nathan Drake was Zac Efron, he's around the right age and has that look, but then I said "they'll probably just go with the popular route and cast like Tom Holland" .........I never hated hated being right so much
I really saw what the director was trying to do. In some parts of the film, I could clearly see how they basically redid some scenes from all of the uncharted games, but redid it in a way to be put in the game and could easily have not been pointed out.
For Example:
1. There was a scene where Nate And Chloe where looking up in the sewer in the movie, and had some mechanics, that looked like the scene in Uncharted 4 where the camera aimed up, at the clock tower.
2: The ending scene of the ships, reminded of the first game, where the helicopter took the statue in El Dorado up in the sky, but in this instant, it was the ships and the ships reminded of Uncharted 4
There are more comparrisions i’d share of what I thought, but i’d be too long of a paragraph, but just playing Uncharted series a million times, I know in the movie, they switched things up in a different perspective but somewhat recreated the games, tho it changed a major in characters, locations, viewpoints. I believe they are trying to recreate the whole movie as the games story, but this means a whole different perspective
Huge Uncharted fan since the release of Uncharted 2, still hasn't watched Uncharted and never will
Could someone who has seen the film explain why Sully and Nate completely destroyed Magellan's ships? And also what was at stake at that point? I might be misremembering....but who cares if the mercenaries get the ships? Surely that's a better scenario than completely destroying them "if we can't have them, nobody can!".... I must have missed something... one minute they're on a treasure hunt, the next minute they're smashing the ships into rockfaces. I still don't get why Nate or Sully tried to prevent the mercenaries from excavating the ships by completely destroying them. Most people would have just shrugged or hid until they landed and tried to sneak away. Instead they wreck the ships when an already heavily funded mercenary group has successfully retrieved them. I dont get it. Was there any point to it,?
who the hell casted tom holland for nathan drake? He looks like nathan who just went out from high school...
i think i speak for everyone when i say all we see is our friendly neighborhood spiderman
In my head canon, Sahara with Matthew McConnaghey is the movie adaptation of Uncharted.
How to make an Uncharted movie;
1) Take Uncharted 4
2) Take out the gameplay
3) release to theaters
= profit!
💀
The other part that hurt the movie in the eyes of fans, even if it was does entirely to keep a lower rating than a hard R, was how tame the violence was in the action scenes. In addition to the characters not feeling at all like their video game counterparts in anyway except name the action scenes also felt flat. In the games Nathan is no stranger to going full John Wick (or, should we say, John Wick goes full Nathan Drake?) on hordes of enemies while also completing these insane acrobatic stunts to get through a complicated environment. Not only would that not be believable for Tom Holland to do but removing those entirely changes the nature of how movie Nathan works in his world.
Why did they not adapt the fan film on RUclips made with Nathan Fillion and Stephen Lang who look and act exactly as their counterparts, and it is so excellent - I wish that Hollywood had as much passion and drive as they did.
It takes ambition to make a videogame adaptation work
And AVI ARAD has none of that
It takes respect for the source material.
@@jbcatz5 that's also part of ambition
Videogames shouldn't be made into movies, if anything Videogames are somewhat an ultimate form of art.
The 2018 Nathan Fillian fan film is actually really good. I just watched it about 15 minutes ago.
The casting was all wrong. I hope Hollywood gets that they can't just cast an actor/actress in ANY role, just because they're trending.
Nathan and Sully’s first meeting in game is so much like the dynamic between a young Indiana Jones and the treasure hunter who gives Indy his hat in The Last Crusade.
3:14 Calling Elena "badass" is an understatement, a huge one.
i wouldn't say elena is badass...she is sassy...and smart...and brave...but badass is more Chloe's role.
I wonder if the game creators or movies studios actually care of even try to learn lessons to avoid ruining the awesomeness and nostalgia that audience has developed with the original work
I knew how this movie was gonna play out when I saw that AVI ARAD was involved
This was so spot on. Exactly how I remember feeling when leaving the theater. The characters were vapid and one dimensional and had none of their charm or charisma from the games. I remember being really disappointed at the dynamic between Nate and Sully. They didn't trust each other the whole movie, yet in the games, Nate trusts Sully more than anyone.
Oh, there’s no one here yet. I caught it the second it came out. The Perks of sleeping in lol
👋
Cheers!
Nice
Not to mention that the "Magellan's Treasure" plot of Nathan Fillion's Uncharted Fan FIlm was stolen and used in Uncharted. I was actually happy with Tom Holland taking the mantle because he at least resembles young Nate in Uncharted 3 and 4 in the flashback chapters which I thought they were going to use. Instead, like what you said, went FLAT. They could have used both Tom Holland as the young Nate, stories being told by the older wiser Nate cast as Nathan Fillion telling his daughter Cassie as if it was the postlude of Uncharted 4. Come on, Nathan Fillion freaking nails it as Nathan Drake! The intelligent nerd mumblings and gigglings over historical myths, he definitely brought Nate to life.
Let me put ot this way, i enjoyed this ten minute video more overall and probably for a longer duration of time than everything I liked in the movie combined.
tldr: it should have been a show because there isnt enough time for a movie to develop the characters.
Man, Nathan Fillion was a perfect casting for Nathan Drake.
As a kid before i even played uncharted (started playing it now in my adult years) i akways thought tom cruise would be a perfect fit. But i guess he's too old now
If didn't spend 50% time parkouring and rest 30% shooting
Its not uncharted and its a facts
Thanks for all the love guys. It continues to be appreciated.
They should’ve casted Nathan Fillion as Nathan Drake. Tom Holland as Nathan feels uncanny.
I think Tom Cruise would actually be a good Nathan Drake if they started making the movies 10 years ago.
I think in the Mission Impossible series he really sells the “making the most of out of a no-win situation” that Drake showcases time and time again
Tom just doesn't have the cynical but also silly personality that Drake has
I just dont understand why they dont get the writers of the game into the movie production, or even be main directors of it with the help of movie directors
Man I'd probably pay pretty handsomely for a short, well-made live action show with the crew from the short film
Watching the movie just makes games even BETTER
The fact that Nathan Fillion wasn’t cast as drake for the movie is an actual crime
The part that I CAN'T get over is how bad that first chase scene with Nate and Chloe went. Tom was giving his all to the camera and pulled off some decent looking moves, while Chloe had a basic run and would clumsily get by simple obstacles. It was laughably bad to see them cut back to back like that.
They couldn't get a better athletic woman for the scene😂
Nathan Fillion looks almost exactly like Nathan Drake from Uncharted 4
I thought the game's Nathan was modeled after Nathan Fillion
he would've been a better choice for the movie
THING IS it IS though..... it tells its story EXACTLUY how the games do, they start you off in the middle of crazy action only for something dramatic to happen that causes a flashback, to the actual begining of the story, and then the whole story is told up to and including the part we already saw/played, only for it to keep going and progress to the third and final act of the story.
NO OTHER GAME MOVIE has even TRIED to tell their stories in the same way the games do, and that ALONE makes it feel more like uncharted than anything else they could have done. including but not limited to forcing markey mark to grow a mustache.
I could already tell that this movie was going to bomb just by the fact that they got the wrong person to play Drake.
It was missing one thing. Nolan’s heart and soul.
man, this whole video just makes me want more nathan fillion in general
I’m a big fan of the uncharted franchise I was excited for this movie when I saw the movie I thought it was cool but it could be a lot better I agree this isn’t a true uncharted film hopefully the second film will be better and introduce Elena fisher
Honestly, the recent-ish Tintin movie is probably the best Uncharted movie there is.
You know what’s missing?…
Charm. That’s what’s really missing in this movie. The charm that the cast and writers and directors of the games brought to these characters with pulpy lightness in tone. I could even go so far as to describe it as “wholesome”, in a way that’s just bubbling under joking, sarcastic banter.
Not only was Mark badly cast (And I’m not sorry, Tom was a great cast for Nathan Drake, I don’t care what anyone says), but the writing just didn’t have that charm.
And oh, the everyone’s just newly introduced to each other thing: not an excuse. The games had the feeling I’m describing even when the characters barely knew each other, like Nate and Elena in UC1 or Nate and Sully in the UC3 flashbacks.
I’m pretty sure that the writers and director did not understand the games enough. The Last Of Us didn’t work so brilliantly because of anything innate, it worked because they paired a MEGAFAN and tv visionary Craig Mazin with the fucking guy who wrote and directed the games themselves, Neil Druckmann.
Uncharted was doomed before it started. Because I can throw a few names out there that should have been involved hands on:
Neil Druckmann (one of the directors and writers of the games), Josh Scherr (one of the writers), Bruce Straley (a director) and most of all Amy Hennig, who is to Uncharted what Neil is to The Last Of Us.
If you think about it: Hiring the director of VENOM for this… eh…
I don’t care that he did Zombieland, it ain’t Uncharted.
If The Last Of Us proved anything, it’s that if you want it to be great, you need people who firmly understand the source material to the bone.
I totally agree. It just felt like another action movie like Mission impossible. Horrible.
I felt like the reality stone was having some fun
Massive fan of the games, I found this film really good, I think it was a great opener in my eyes so ready for the sequels, too many people want everything all at once these days with cinema, something's just require a build across a few movies
You knew it was gonna be a bad movie when mark wahlberg was casted as Victor Sullivan. Now, I like Wahlberg some of his roles (The Other Guys, The Family Man, Ted), but Sully is... not that. Same goes for Tom Holland. They're all fantastic actors that just made a shitty movie together
I remember the story in every uncharted game, but I completely forgot the story in the movie.