Highly educative.Thanks."Diagnose accurately and half of the job is done". Krishnamurti states, ' If you understand the problem, answers lies within'. Thankyou Dr.sb.
Very inspiring and enlightening conversation on colonial intricacies, multiple layers of colonialism have been highlighted and elaborated with eloquence and perfection.
I was about to listen all lecture but they're using so hard Urdu without reason. I've watched Parvez Hoodbhoy sir and i understand what he speaks. But these panelists are like Ghalib
without a proper ideology, it is not possible to derive the right conclusion. When you are confused, the most important thing is to know the truth then locate where it is? otherwise you are stuck in the fancy terms. Before criticizing the religion, would advice the author to obtain from proper source.
The conversation was good but I really didn't like how Akhtar sab dodged the question from the Baloch lawyer and tried to divert the question in the direction of Taliban whereas it was clearly the state of Pakistan which was meant to be and is the coloniser in case of Balochistan and Pakhtunkhwa as well. That behaviour really leaves bad taste after an otherwise mature discussion
All the societies around the world are made up of individuals having varied schools of thought and background.Therefore the whole society cannot be composted of scholars .Each society is a bunch of individuals having different opinions and mindset.It is not possible to bring the whole society to a single school of thought.As regards the old colonisation process of the previlaged class and the present day colonisation it is based on the same principles of dominance and hegemony. As regards the philosophy of Islam is concerned the learned scholars failed to highlight the glorious period of the Muslim rulers who not only promoted science, technology and culture to its peak.In present times most of the Muslim world is under heavy influence of the West and considers it absolutely necessary to follow the Western traits in order to achieve progress. This is a quiet debateable issue
"Colonialism" has in fact been beneficial to the Indian subcontinent. India has been a great beneficiary. Compare to Muslim elites aka the degenerates, Hindu elites welcomed the New Learning. They also knew that the old Hindu world has been dead for centuries. But they knew that the process of change would take place incrementally. The primacy of rule of law, the sanctity of Parliament and the free press have been the backbone of Indian democracy. Result? Millions rose from the subsistence poverty level. The poor, for the very first time, joined the middle class. Unlike India, Pakistan sank. Clueless about the importance of establishing civic and political institutions. The idea of rule of law and the idea of "Careers open to talent" remained abstract. Any body with an ounce of functioning mind see the obvious: Jinnah's Pakistan died decades ago. What exist now is a bankrupt Jihadi state. In such a state, the middle class hit the rock bottom. Yes, poverty rose. In this specter of poverty, there will be people who would find time to amuse themselves with trivial books.
Very thought provoking talk. Need more discussions like this
بہت عمدہ, شور کی ثقافت, اور ناقابل شناخت استعمار کا شکار معاشرہ(نامعلوم افراد و الہ کار نظام)
Highly educative.Thanks."Diagnose accurately and half of the job is done". Krishnamurti states, ' If you understand the problem, answers lies within'. Thankyou Dr.sb.
After such a long time,we had an opportunity of listening to the rich,prcise, ornamentally beautified Urdu with all it's aesthetics! ❤
One of finest discussions I observed lately. Well done, team TBH and thanks to speakers.
Very inspiring and enlightening conversation on colonial intricacies, multiple layers of colonialism have been highlighted and elaborated with eloquence and perfection.
Really a wonderful conversation
Very informative ❤
Very informative.
مجھے ایسی اردو سن کر بہت مزہ آیا ہے۔
Sir the great
An important addition to the discourse on Imperialism. How to get a copy in India?
I was about to listen all lecture but they're using so hard Urdu without reason. I've watched Parvez Hoodbhoy sir and i understand what he speaks. But these panelists are like Ghalib
During the Zia rule once Faize Ahmad Faize had said that in Urdu there are 80% words
But as a result of this , he was put under house arrest
good conversation
❤❤❤
without a proper ideology, it is not possible to derive the right conclusion. When you are confused, the most important thing is to know the truth then locate where it is? otherwise you are stuck in the fancy terms. Before criticizing the religion, would advice the author to obtain from proper source.
Balk,hol,zandbata❤❤❤
The conversation was good but I really didn't like how Akhtar sab dodged the question from the Baloch lawyer and tried to divert the question in the direction of Taliban whereas it was clearly the state of Pakistan which was meant to be and is the coloniser in case of Balochistan and Pakhtunkhwa as well.
That behaviour really leaves bad taste after an otherwise mature discussion
Zinda Hai Bhutto Zinda Hai
Qazi ki laffazi,,,,zabar10.........90% logon kay sir say ooper ooper guzar chuka
All the societies around the world are made up of individuals having varied schools of thought and background.Therefore the whole society cannot be composted of scholars .Each society is a bunch of individuals having different opinions and mindset.It is not possible to bring the whole society to a single school of thought.As regards the old colonisation process of the previlaged class and the present day colonisation it is based on the same principles of dominance and hegemony. As regards the philosophy of Islam is concerned the learned scholars failed to highlight the glorious period of the Muslim rulers who not only promoted science, technology and culture to its peak.In present times most of the Muslim world is under heavy influence of the West and considers it absolutely necessary to follow the Western traits in order to achieve progress. This is a quiet debateable issue
"Colonialism" has in fact been beneficial to the Indian subcontinent. India has been a great beneficiary. Compare to Muslim elites aka the degenerates, Hindu elites welcomed the New Learning. They also knew that the old Hindu world has been dead for centuries. But they knew that the process of change would take place incrementally. The primacy of rule of law, the sanctity of Parliament and the free press have been the backbone of Indian democracy. Result? Millions rose from the subsistence poverty level. The poor, for the very first time, joined the middle class. Unlike India, Pakistan sank. Clueless about the importance of establishing civic and political institutions. The idea of rule of law and the idea of "Careers open to talent" remained abstract. Any body with an ounce of functioning mind see the obvious: Jinnah's Pakistan died decades ago. What exist now is a bankrupt Jihadi state. In such a state, the middle class hit the rock bottom. Yes, poverty rose. In this specter of poverty, there will be people who would find time to amuse themselves with trivial books.
Bus theek hi hai
Islam kia tha ?????
پدر سری مشکل لفظ ہے۔ اسکی جگہ patriarchal ہی مناسب ہے۔