I think only canon lenses can compete with sigma in terms of autofocus stills lenses, but it’s like a 3% improvement for triple the price lol. All my zoom lenses are made by Sigma: no regrets.
@@CartyCantDance What? AF on all modern lenses doesn't matter who of the big manufacturer makes them is more than good enough for anything... doesn't matter if Fuji, Sony, Sigma, Canon, Tamron, Nikon, Olympus or Panasonic is written on there... 20 years ago people literally measured AF performance in seconds to have a comparison.... they stopped doing it because it's so fast that it absolutely doesn't matter and you can't reasonably conceive a difference
@@CartyCantDance yeah Canon really has shit the bed on that whole image quality part though with like the last 3 lenses they released which are all by far worse than anything anyone has done in the last 10 years that even compared to some chinese lenses just lose.... If you'd have watched the last few reviews on them and took of your fanboy glasses you'd have seen that and they clearly showed the flaws in them with soft corners terrible contrast loss when shooting against the sun etc etc etc And in over 40 years of photography i have never heard anyone talk about Canon and Microcontrast in the same sentence... Leica and Zeiss are known for lenses that produce beautiful micro contrast.... Neither Canon nor Sony nor Sigma nor Nikon are known for their Lenses producing micro contrasts
@@LoFiAxolotl Micro contrast is just contrast (detail) at high frequencies (so fine details), which is hardly the exclusive purview of Leica and Zeiss. It seems that you may have been reading German lens fanboys making up new definitions of existing technical terms to try to justify their expensive purchases.
Jordan was probably kept in a windowless basement for the last 6 weeks that's why you can't even see him in this video... nice trick just playing some old audio of him and pretending like he's behind the camera though
You know it's a video where Chris is involved when there's a separate chapter on sunstars while bokeh, breathing, distortions are all hidden inside the video.
@@debarghyasenguptaphotoandfilms Nikon has been the ugly duckling lately hasn’t it? Other then them buying one of the biggest companies in the industry there really wasn’t any news
Sony’s active stabilization seems to not work as well with third party lenses. It’s not very effective on v1 of the Sigma. Any chance of an improvement with v2?
Now that we finally get focus breathing comp on the a7SIII and the A1, I'm going to have to stick with the Sony 24-70 GM II. Between that and losing the option to shoot any faster than 15fps on my A1 the lower cost just doesn't do enough for me. I do think the Sigma is a fantastic lens and if you are on a tighter budget is a great option though!
Good review, but what about color? Sigma lenses I've used in a past seemed a bit greenish compared to Sony.. I already have some Sony lenses and "linear manual focus" on new GM II series is a real benefit for video shooting.
Is it parafocal? Could be a nice alternative to way heavier and expensive Lumix. But I love the possibility of the pull focus I have in the Lumix 24-105mm
The sigma 28-70 is always an option… it weights absolutely nothing… though considering it’s only marginally cheaper than the 24-70 now I’m not sure it has much of an appeal other than weight
Dang. Always been wanting to buy the 24-70 2.8 GMii, because i was thinking if i'm gonna buy, might as well get the best. Now i dont know if i should instead consider on getting the Sigma 24-70 2.8 ii.
its great that this is naturally focus breathing corrected. the sony gmaster incurs a crop with the breathing compensation correction feature which annoyingly is only available for specific expensive gmaster lenses. great job sigma. This will be arguably better for l-mount where the lens will not be restricted below 15fps because it’s not a first party lens too. I wish sony would remove that artificial limitation for the a1 and a9iii with third party lenses.
Does the de-clicked aperture ring actually physically move the aperture or is it just electronically mobing the aperture? It's nice to actually directly control the aperture for video work
@@Bayonet1809 that’s kinda sad but I guess all modern photography lenses pack the direct aperture control… it’d be nice for video for smooth transitions in aperture
Awesome! A well done update to the existing sigma 24-70. I just wonder why you didn't find much loca, when Christopher Frost found some of the worst i have seen i recent times? What an exciting day!
Not the first lens this happens on. I wonder if Frost gets some bad apples sometimes or does better tests to find the flaws. Makes it difficult to know for sure.
Having shot with an early copy of the Sony G Master, it wouldn't be hard to be as good or better. The Sony was soft on the edges and AF was marginal but it has good bokeh. It's good to see Sigma releasing updated models I hope they revisit the 12-24 soon
I’ve had the sigma 28-70mm f2.8 for a while now. This lens doesn’t make me want to upgrade, but if I didn’t already have that lens I would be drooling over this one
What do you think about the 28-70? How's the focus speed? Bokeh? Any noticeable color fringing? Even though this lens is, probably awesome, an even lighter option is also attractive. Also, any reason that you preferred this Sigma over Tamron 28-75?
@@Daniel_Ilyich I mean it’s literally perfect in every way I could think of. I pair it with the sigma 16-28 f2.8. It’s so sharp that I soften my images in post even with a diffusion filter. I’m sure the 24-70 is better because of some weather sealing and maybe CA correction, but I’ve always had clients say wonderful things about my work with the 28-70mm
Sorry to bombard you with questions, I noticed that the 28-70 has a step motor rather the linear motors on the more expensive lenses, how do you find the focus accuracy? How does it focus in low-light? Is it noisy? Promise, no more questions.
@@Daniel_Ilyich never had an issue with focusing noise or performance. Like any other lens, if you subject is in a high contrast backlit scenario then your lens might not have perfect AF. but you can usually calibrate your camera’s AF settings to compensate. Hell I’m saying all this working on the lumix s5ii instead of Sony autofocus, so the performance is even more impressive
So, will Leica 24-70 ii come with the aperture ring ? It will be so cool, if Leica version come with a new feature that during mode, the aperture will automatically become de-check mode, then, the won’t need to make a button for this?
honestly, i wish the Sony 24-70 GM2 did have a lens lock button. I've had mine for two years, and lens creep does happen especially when it's pointed downward while on my HoldFast Gear straps
I already have a Gen 1 SONY 24-70 GM (bought used for $900), how does it compare to Sigma's Gen II? My biggest issue is weight, and original SONY gen 1 is so heavy during travel.
I’d love the Sigma 24-70mm on my Sony Apsc, especially considering the crop factor but can’t really find examples of photos. Can anybody share their experience?
Thanks for yet another very informative product info! As an owner of the first version I was hoping for more direct comparisons between the two Sigma generations as to how much or how little the advancements are. Given Sigma’s history, newer typically means better. Let’s say I had to replace my lens right this moment due to loss or damage, do I confidently jump on V2 or would the advancements be so minor that getting a reduced price V1 might be the better deal, let alone a used one in excellent condition? Or is there maybe something so incredibly much better with the new version that I should be thinking about upgrading as soon as possible?
Compared to the original Sony 24-70 GM how much better is this one? I’m looking to buy a 24-70 and found the original 24-70 GM at the same price as the New Sigma 24-70. Which one would you recommend?
I'm much more interested in the Sony GM MKII than this lens. I'm pretty burned on sigma because of the dust issues with the original 24-70. Dust always keeps getting inside the lens. I have 3 other sigma lenses with no dust issue and a couple sony lenses with no dust issue but I'm still just not willing to but another one from them. It's too annoying. I also just simply need lenses that aren't locked from shooting at higher burst speeds on sony cameras.
As excited as I am about the Tamron 28-75 G2 coming out on Z mount, I’d prefer this lens on Z mount. Pleeeeease Sigma!! Sneaky suspicion Nikon will not let this on Z mount 😢
They are very similar in size, and would be almost the same size on the shorter flange Nikon Z mount, so if you think the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 is huge then you won't be happy with this Sigma either.
@@Bayonet1809 It is slightly smaller and lighter at least, and considering I had two of the Nikon lens that both had a faulty focus ring, hopefully better built too. The main difference from what I can see is that the Sigma is a narrower diameter for most of the barrel, extending wider for the front element, but the Nikon is consistently wide throughout the length. I'd be curious to compare them side-by-side though!
I'm already looking forward to the old version going down in price 😬 OT, it was a bit jarring that the business owner is prettier than the professional model. You could've featured her more.
The finish on my Sigma 85 f1.4 art has deteriorated terribly and so puts me off buying another Sigma. Stunning lens but the paint on the metal part of the lens is terrible. I can no longer read some of the numbers on the aperture ring
800$ cheaper and optically both are more than good enough with each having flaws that are minor the Pana feels a lot more substantial though… and with that I mean heavier and longer… both are excellent lenses but I can’t find a reason that would justify spending 800$ more on the pana
Oh god, I watched 4 reviews (Christofer Frost, Gerald Undone, Arthur R and you), and everyone sees completely different results with all aspects of this lens, except maybe center sharpness. And it's not the case of "you should watch more reviews to get comprehensive opinion", no, it's just like y'all got very different lenses. Just look at LOCA in your review and Frosts, or at focus breathing in Geralds! I can't build ANY opinion this time.
Can you tell please I nave sigma 24-70 2.8 gm1 and use it mostly for video, zoom ring is very tight its very annoying to zoom smoothly. How about zoom stiffness on new lense?
Hey @travelpatron what would you suggest mostly for video, the new sigma 24-70 mark 2 vs the Sony 24-105 f4 oss? Thanks in advance ! Btw I have a sony zv-e1
@@kevinl8791 I got sigma 24-70 2.8 and it is good for low light situations and sony 70-200 f4 g2. I think you need 2.8 lenses at least one to have in your pocket
What was the continuous capture limit on 3rd party? OMG don't gloss over this stuff that can be HUGE! That's operational that can't be fixed or changed in post and is what is actually important! No one actually cares that not that it's slightly less sharp in the corners at 2.8 or at whatever range and if they do, the really don't know what they are doing. If it can be fixed in post, then it doesn't matter.
Thank you guys, That Lens looks great I am selling my version 1. Feels the same, weight is the same, probably just enough deviation In the optical formula from the G master to avoid breaking any patent laws!! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Hmm it’s wired how your LOCA test differs in results from Christopher Frost. For him this is one of the biggest downsides of this lens and only disappears closing down to F11.
$1200 for a near perfect 24-70... Sigma really knocking it out of the park again and again and again
I think only canon lenses can compete with sigma in terms of autofocus stills lenses, but it’s like a 3% improvement for triple the price lol.
All my zoom lenses are made by Sigma: no regrets.
@@CartyCantDance What? AF on all modern lenses doesn't matter who of the big manufacturer makes them is more than good enough for anything... doesn't matter if Fuji, Sony, Sigma, Canon, Tamron, Nikon, Olympus or Panasonic is written on there... 20 years ago people literally measured AF performance in seconds to have a comparison.... they stopped doing it because it's so fast that it absolutely doesn't matter and you can't reasonably conceive a difference
@@LoFiAxolotl I wasn’t talking about AF performance, I was talking about image quality and micro contrast
@@CartyCantDance yeah Canon really has shit the bed on that whole image quality part though with like the last 3 lenses they released which are all by far worse than anything anyone has done in the last 10 years that even compared to some chinese lenses just lose.... If you'd have watched the last few reviews on them and took of your fanboy glasses you'd have seen that and they clearly showed the flaws in them with soft corners terrible contrast loss when shooting against the sun etc etc etc
And in over 40 years of photography i have never heard anyone talk about Canon and Microcontrast in the same sentence... Leica and Zeiss are known for lenses that produce beautiful micro contrast.... Neither Canon nor Sony nor Sigma nor Nikon are known for their Lenses producing micro contrasts
@@LoFiAxolotl Micro contrast is just contrast (detail) at high frequencies (so fine details), which is hardly the exclusive purview of Leica and Zeiss. It seems that you may have been reading German lens fanboys making up new definitions of existing technical terms to try to justify their expensive purchases.
PetaPixel is on fire right now. SO MANY VIDEOS
Jordan was probably kept in a windowless basement for the last 6 weeks that's why you can't even see him in this video... nice trick just playing some old audio of him and pretending like he's behind the camera though
You know it's a video where Chris is involved when there's a separate chapter on sunstars while bokeh, breathing, distortions are all hidden inside the video.
We didn’t even get a shot of a puddle while complaining about shots of puddles… quality of the videos has dropped so much
LOL
Between this, the Fuji announcements, and the Canon R1, we’re eating good this week 📸
not like we can afford it all lol 😂
Hope for the z6iii announcement too😢
@@debarghyasenguptaphotoandfilms me too but there's no hint abt that. not even a trailer
@@debarghyasenguptaphotoandfilms Nikon has been the ugly duckling lately hasn’t it? Other then them buying one of the biggest companies in the industry there really wasn’t any news
10:54 ..35 mm Chris..???? Really..??
😂😂😂
And wide open???
Sony’s active stabilization seems to not work as well with third party lenses. It’s not very effective on v1 of the Sigma. Any chance of an improvement with v2?
Best looking video so far from you guys! Finally some shallow DoF in your shots! Thx for the awesome content!
Can always count on Peta pixel to give us the most uninspiring sample shots.
The gen 1 version is good, but pretty rough in sunlight in some spots. I’m waiting for the rumored 24-70 F/2 from Sony.
gen 1 is better than gen 1 sony g master, but that's not saying much. I've had the gen 1 sigma. it made me change systems, not a dud, but sub mediocre
Now that we finally get focus breathing comp on the a7SIII and the A1, I'm going to have to stick with the Sony 24-70 GM II. Between that and losing the option to shoot any faster than 15fps on my A1 the lower cost just doesn't do enough for me. I do think the Sigma is a fantastic lens and if you are on a tighter budget is a great option though!
Hey can I just say that the cinematography of this review at 3:40 makes me really happy; happy to see it!
From what I'm seeing it doesn't seem like its worth upgrading from version 1?
Great production quality on this episode. That Sigma lens also looks like a great deal.
Just like watching your videos. Positive, great insight and content, superbly presented, shot and edited. Perfect.
Sigma 24-70 has been my primary lens for so long. Love sigma lens.
I just ordered my Sigma today, can’t wait to get it😬😬
Great video with all those extra helpers. Not in the market for this type of lens, but still entertaining way to keep up with the news.
Good review, but what about color? Sigma lenses I've used in a past seemed a bit greenish compared to Sony..
I already have some Sony lenses and "linear manual focus" on new GM II series is a real benefit for video shooting.
Amazing delivery by Chris, superb video production quality, & yup - the Sigma’s our next zoom lens. Thx guys!
~ an Albertan in Dubai
Is it parafocal? Could be a nice alternative to way heavier and expensive Lumix. But I love the possibility of the pull focus I have in the Lumix 24-105mm
The sigma 28-70 is always an option… it weights absolutely nothing… though considering it’s only marginally cheaper than the 24-70 now I’m not sure it has much of an appeal other than weight
Dang. Always been wanting to buy the 24-70 2.8 GMii, because i was thinking if i'm gonna buy, might as well get the best. Now i dont know if i should instead consider on getting the Sigma 24-70 2.8 ii.
I've done two transactions with KEH. Very happy with the price and the process. Much better than dealing with E-Bay.
I have the 28-70, seriously tempted by this though.
its great that this is naturally focus breathing corrected. the sony gmaster incurs a crop with the breathing compensation correction feature which annoyingly is only available for specific expensive gmaster lenses. great job sigma. This will be arguably better for l-mount where the lens will not be restricted below 15fps because it’s not a first party lens too. I wish sony would remove that artificial limitation for the a1 and a9iii with third party lenses.
Does the de-clicked aperture ring actually physically move the aperture or is it just electronically mobing the aperture? It's nice to actually directly control the aperture for video work
Everything is electronically actuated on Sigma DN lenses.
@@Bayonet1809 that’s kinda sad but I guess all modern photography lenses pack the direct aperture control… it’d be nice for video for smooth transitions in aperture
Brilliant review. Makes me more want to sell my Canon R6 and go over to Sony, just to use these beautiful Sigma lenses.
Awesome! A well done update to the existing sigma 24-70.
I just wonder why you didn't find much loca, when Christopher Frost found some of the worst i have seen i recent times?
What an exciting day!
Not the first lens this happens on. I wonder if Frost gets some bad apples sometimes or does better tests to find the flaws. Makes it difficult to know for sure.
The LoCA is very visible in the sample photo at 4:58. I just think their specific test for it was not particularly revealing.
Having shot with an early copy of the Sony G Master, it wouldn't be hard to be as good or better. The Sony was soft on the edges and AF was marginal but it has good bokeh. It's good to see Sigma releasing updated models I hope they revisit the 12-24 soon
I’ve had the sigma 28-70mm f2.8 for a while now. This lens doesn’t make me want to upgrade, but if I didn’t already have that lens I would be drooling over this one
What do you think about the 28-70? How's the focus speed? Bokeh? Any noticeable color fringing? Even though this lens is, probably awesome, an even lighter option is also attractive. Also, any reason that you preferred this Sigma over Tamron 28-75?
@@Daniel_Ilyich I mean it’s literally perfect in every way I could think of. I pair it with the sigma 16-28 f2.8. It’s so sharp that I soften my images in post even with a diffusion filter. I’m sure the 24-70 is better because of some weather sealing and maybe CA correction, but I’ve always had clients say wonderful things about my work with the 28-70mm
@@CartyCantDance That's very reasuring. Good to hear that from a working photographer, rather than a professional reviewer.
Sorry to bombard you with questions, I noticed that the 28-70 has a step motor rather the linear motors on the more expensive lenses, how do you find the focus accuracy? How does it focus in low-light? Is it noisy? Promise, no more questions.
@@Daniel_Ilyich never had an issue with focusing noise or performance. Like any other lens, if you subject is in a high contrast backlit scenario then your lens might not have perfect AF. but you can usually calibrate your camera’s AF settings to compensate. Hell I’m saying all this working on the lumix s5ii instead of Sony autofocus, so the performance is even more impressive
Nicely done, guys!
Damn so cinematic! Great video work Jordan 👏
A lot of this was shot by Shawn and Raymond, and I agree it’s one of our best looking episodes!
- Jordan
@@PetaPixel well aren't they amazing too!! I think I even preferred the video work here to the Ronin 4d video
Lol, Tony N's observation: "It's great at sun stars!" Chris's observation: "It's bad at sun stars!"
So, will Leica 24-70 ii come with the aperture ring ? It will be so cool, if Leica version come with a new feature that during mode, the aperture will automatically become de-check mode, then, the won’t need to make a button for this?
Did you feel it syncs with the Active Stabilization as well as the G-Master does? Thanks!
honestly, i wish the Sony 24-70 GM2 did have a lens lock button. I've had mine for two years, and lens creep does happen especially when it's pointed downward while on my HoldFast Gear straps
_sigh_
Another one for the Camera/Lens Bucket list ( that I cannot afford _right now_ )
Otherwise, nice in-depth video!
I already have a Gen 1 SONY 24-70 GM (bought used for $900), how does it compare to Sigma's Gen II? My biggest issue is weight, and original SONY gen 1 is so heavy during travel.
I’d love the Sigma 24-70mm on my Sony Apsc, especially considering the crop factor but can’t really find examples of photos. Can anybody share their experience?
again . . Thanks Masta for great review ! . . missed sir Jordan though in the scene
Thanks for yet another very informative product info! As an owner of the first version I was hoping for more direct comparisons between the two Sigma generations as to how much or how little the advancements are. Given Sigma’s history, newer typically means better. Let’s say I had to replace my lens right this moment due to loss or damage, do I confidently jump on V2 or would the advancements be so minor that getting a reduced price V1 might be the better deal, let alone a used one in excellent condition? Or is there maybe something so incredibly much better with the new version that I should be thinking about upgrading as soon as possible?
can't wait to get the 18-35 art lens MK II
Finally, been waiting for weeks
The OG Sigma is a great value!
Compared to the original Sony 24-70 GM how much better is this one? I’m looking to buy a 24-70 and found the original 24-70 GM at the same price as the New Sigma 24-70. Which one would you recommend?
Thats a lot of prep for a regularish test of a regularish zoom. Im impressed.
Gerald Undone did another test that the Sigma won with it not getting washed out. You should add that to your testing of lens.
I'm much more interested in the Sony GM MKII than this lens. I'm pretty burned on sigma because of the dust issues with the original 24-70. Dust always keeps getting inside the lens. I have 3 other sigma lenses with no dust issue and a couple sony lenses with no dust issue but I'm still just not willing to but another one from them. It's too annoying. I also just simply need lenses that aren't locked from shooting at higher burst speeds on sony cameras.
My Sigma FP was hoping this lens would feature image stabilization.
Lovely photos!
DOH! I just purchased the previous Sigma 24 - 70mm. No wonder it was a couple hundred dollars off. I didn’t know that II was on the way. 😅
As long as this one doesn't collect dust internally, I'll be happy.
Question regarding focus breathing. Did you compare focus breathing with the focus breathing compensation turned on for both lenses?
Breathing compensation does not work with 3rd party lenses. It was disabled on the Sony GMII.
Love your content man, any time I have questions just need to check your channel.
❤
Does it still zoom the wrong way compared to Sony?
First the 24-70 came then 70 -200. Now even the version 2 of the 24-70 came but not even a single 16 -35😢
Hoping for a bokeh comparison between the old and new version in the final review.
I am kinda scared about the stabilisation for hand held filming.
As excited as I am about the Tamron 28-75 G2 coming out on Z mount, I’d prefer this lens on Z mount. Pleeeeease Sigma!!
Sneaky suspicion Nikon will not let this on Z mount 😢
Why are third party lenses capped at 15 fps on stills?
Question for videographers, which one would you choose, Sony 24-105 f4 OSS vs new sigma 24-70 mark 2 f2.8? btw I’m using a Sony zv-e1, thanks!! 🙌
I'd really like to see this come to the Z-mount at some point. Nikon's offering is hugely expensive and hugely huge.
They are very similar in size, and would be almost the same size on the shorter flange Nikon Z mount, so if you think the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 is huge then you won't be happy with this Sigma either.
@@Bayonet1809 It is slightly smaller and lighter at least, and considering I had two of the Nikon lens that both had a faulty focus ring, hopefully better built too. The main difference from what I can see is that the Sigma is a narrower diameter for most of the barrel, extending wider for the front element, but the Nikon is consistently wide throughout the length. I'd be curious to compare them side-by-side though!
Wrong zoom direction for me, but damn this would be appealing for Z mount.
I have the original 24-7 and love it. This would have to be something special for me to consider trading up.
I'm already looking forward to the old version going down in price 😬
OT, it was a bit jarring that the business owner is prettier than the professional model. You could've featured her more.
The real question is the new Sigma or the original G-Master since they are pretty close in price.
im currently using the version 1,do you think it is okay to stay with this or upgrade
Not enough of a difference to upgrade really.
Sony 24-50 or Sigma 24-70 please ?
The finish on my Sigma 85 f1.4 art has deteriorated terribly and so puts me off buying another Sigma. Stunning lens but the paint on the metal part of the lens is terrible. I can no longer read some of the numbers on the aperture ring
How does this lens compare to the lumix 24-70 2.8 S Pro?
800$ cheaper and optically both are more than good enough with each having flaws that are minor the Pana feels a lot more substantial though… and with that I mean heavier and longer… both are excellent lenses but I can’t find a reason that would justify spending 800$ more on the pana
Does the IBIS work with this lens?
Ibis works with every lens… it’s in body… the lens does not have OIS though (like most 24-70 really not needed at wide focal lengths)
Oh god, I watched 4 reviews (Christofer Frost, Gerald Undone, Arthur R and you), and everyone sees completely different results with all aspects of this lens, except maybe center sharpness.
And it's not the case of "you should watch more reviews to get comprehensive opinion", no, it's just like y'all got very different lenses. Just look at LOCA in your review and Frosts, or at focus breathing in Geralds!
I can't build ANY opinion this time.
Personally I would discount this 'review' from consideration.
PetaPixel is officially THE GOAT CHANNEL
Can you tell please I nave sigma 24-70 2.8 gm1 and use it mostly for video, zoom ring is very tight its very annoying to zoom smoothly. How about zoom stiffness on new lense?
Hey @travelpatron what would you suggest mostly for video, the new sigma 24-70 mark 2 vs the Sony 24-105 f4 oss? Thanks in advance ! Btw I have a sony zv-e1
@@kevinl8791 I got sigma 24-70 2.8 and it is good for low light situations and sony 70-200 f4 g2. I think you need 2.8 lenses at least one to have in your pocket
@7:30 - no LoCA, @4:57 - plenty of LoCA. So which is that?
Is there a noise in video af?
Where is jordan ?
a7siii still slaying it
Leica should do a rebranding...
That would be my next lens but I have a Canon R5 😡 the Canon version is twice that price
Why are you comparing this to the Sony and not to the Sigma version 1?
Because the Sony is its rival🤷♂️
Boy, it must be brutal paying twice as much on Z or RF mounts.
Did you just say sun stars for video?
Dear Sigma, please bring this to Canon RF asap, much appreciated!
2:19 Boop! 🐶
Anyone know where to buy in Australia?
How much are asking Canon and Nikon for a 24-70 f2.8? 😳
Gys you are rocking today
What was the continuous capture limit on 3rd party? OMG don't gloss over this stuff that can be HUGE! That's operational that can't be fixed or changed in post and is what is actually important! No one actually cares that not that it's slightly less sharp in the corners at 2.8 or at whatever range and if they do, the really don't know what they are doing. If it can be fixed in post, then it doesn't matter.
When the Canon RF version comes out I’m all in.
Now do RF
This is such a good deal it'll have Sony considering banning third party lenses 😂
The Sony is much sharper throughout the entire plane, both in the center and in the corners of the image. The difference is big.
But does it sync stabe? - CC
?????
@@VaHe2KG No. No it does not. Only first party lenses can sync lens ois with ibis. Deal breaker.
Dear Sigma, when will you finally give me my Z-version of your lenses!?
Soo...many...products!!! (And still no Ricoh gr4 )
Thank you guys, That Lens looks great I am selling my version 1.
Feels the same, weight is the same, probably just enough deviation In the optical formula from the G master to avoid breaking any patent laws!! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lack of breathing? Watch Gerald Undone's review to see the breathing in action.
Does it suck in dusts easily?
Hmm it’s wired how your LOCA test differs in results from Christopher Frost. For him this is one of the biggest downsides of this lens and only disappears closing down to F11.
Noooo I bought the first version like last summer for 1100 noooo! Oh well
7.14 autofocus problems..