HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
- -----------------Support the channel-----------
Patreon: / thedissenter
PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter
PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy
PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l
PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz
PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m
PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: tinyurl.com/y95uvkao
-----------------Follow me on--------------------
Facebook: / thedissenteryt
Twitter: / thedissenteryt
Podcast: bit.ly/3FeSNqb
This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: enlites.com/
RECORDED ON MARCH 4th 2024.
Dr. Charles Roseman is an Associate Professor of evolution, ecology and behavior at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He studies the evolution of complex traits.
In this episode, we first talk about complex traits and how we study their evolution, and we talk about adaptations, by-products, phenotypic plasticity, and genetic drift. We discuss the limitations of adaptationism. We talk about the example of the evolution of the cranium in hominins, and hybridization in human evolution. We then discuss group differences, the debate between the hereditarians and the anti-hereditarians, and questions surrounding differences in intelligence and IQ, and the concept of race. We also talk about issues with mechanistic explanations for the anti-hereditarian position, and the role of genes in group differences. We discuss the factors that play a role in variation in body form among human groups, and how developmental processes shape evolution. Finally, we talk about Drs. Roseman and Ocobock’s Scientific American article, “To Understand Sex, We Need to Ask the Right Questions”.
Time Links:
00:00 Intro
00:40 What is a complex trait?
02:55 How to study the evolution of traits
09:50 The limitations of adaptationism
20:47 The evolution of the cranium in hominins
30:53 Hybridization in human evolution
33:57 Group differences, and the debate between the hereditarians and the anti-hereditarians
39:41 Intelligence, IQ, and race
49:58 Issues with mechanistic explanations for the anti-hereditarian position
56:27 The role of genes in group differences
1:01:56 How to approach race scientifically
1:13:12 Variation in body form among human groups
1:17:32 How developmental processes shape evolution
1:22:49 To Understand Sex, We Need to Ask the Right Questions
1:49:28 Follow Dr. Roseman’s work!
--
Follow Dr. Roseman’s work:
Faculty page: bit.ly/3sJNTP1
Google Scholar page: bit.ly/3G6MPYw
To Understand Sex, We Need to Ask the Right Questions: tinyurl.com/yc4tmt2j
Twitter handle: @EvoRoseman
--
A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, ERIK ENGMAN, LUCY, YHONATAN SHEMESH, MANVIR SINGH, AND PETRA WEIMANN!
A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, AND NICK GOLDEN!
AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!
#TheDissenter #CharlesRoseman #Biology
Thanks, Ricardo!
excellent talk gentlemen, D.A. NYC
I absolutely love the (almost Hegelian) reversal against the mechanistic side of the anti-hereditarian position. After all, a truly radical position would approach the question differently to begin with!
Thanks. "Almost Hegelian" could be one of the highest compliments I've ever gotten.
50 years since Lucy was discovered!! Just had a symposium on youtube!
On page 324 Katie wrote…., On page 688 Johnny wrote…., On page 11, 867 Daddy wrote….,…. etc! It is possible to write a book only by listing what others have written and then writing what he has stolen and polluted! Science on the Planet of the Apes is unique!
Not one of the better ones.
Kevin Mitchell, or Daniel Nettle would completely dismantle many of his borderline incoherent arguments.
If you’re new to this channel don’t judge it on this one. Most of Ricardos interviews are great.
Kevin told me he liked the interview…
lol, Kevin Mitchell is a dullard. Talk about not one of the better ones...
The arguments made here aren't incoherent, they're just beyond you.
5:00 Natural selection works similar to hidden gods that works miraculously! That seems familiar! Where did he found that?!
what’s adaptation, fitness,….etc why doesn’t he give a clear definition of all that and what’s the mechanism behind them,…etc that’s instead of ambiguity (actually abusing ambiguity).
this guy could have just said, "It's more complicated than you think" and that sums up his whole talk!! He doesn't say anything very definitive at all.
Would you like a clarification on anything? Let me know and I'll do my best.
@@charlesroseman6416 I looked at your article that caused the controversy. I enjoyed your talk but I think the whole sex debate should be put into the context of imminent "biological annihilation" - a phrase that is found in googlescholar. Female mammals have twice as many oxytocin neuroreceptors and that's what bonds the female mammals to their babies - no health insurance covered surgery is going to change that sex trait fact. People like to get trendy surgeries or treatments or whatever without really understanding biology on a deeper level - much less humanity. Have you read "The Harmless People" by Dr. Elizabeth Marshall Thomas? Or watched Professor Jerome Lewis' talk on music before language? Our original human culture (the San Bushmen) lived without war because all the males were required to train in spiritual healing based on celibacy via the right side vagus nerve. That was the central focus of human culture from 225,000 years ago and it's still around today! Quite fascinating that this biology is not understood today - it's what I call "noncommutative quantum biology" - start with Professor Basil J. Hiley's book chapter in the 2022 quantum consciousness book published by Cambridge. Can Quantum Mechanics Solve the Hard Problem of Consciousness?
Basil J. Hiley & Paavo Pylkkänen
In Shan Gao (ed.), Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics. Oxford, UK: (2022) - freely readable online - near the end of that article he points out how quantum biology has been wrong thus far for ignoring noncommutativity. thanks
@@charlesroseman6416 my reply probably got censored - so I posted it on my youtube channel comments on my latest live upload. thanks