Why is it that a Protestant Supreme Court passed Roe v Wade while a Catholic Supreme Court has to clean up your mess? Historically, the Protestant countries all legalized abortion first. Catholic countries like South America and Philippines and Poland have stayed strong. Feminism is chaos and exclusively a creation of Protestantism. Chaos breeds chaos.
Oooh, I didn't know about Tamale Abuelas. Will check it out, thank you! I adore pasta grannies and it has greatly increased my motivation to make pasta myself😊 I?m a housewife and I take a lot of pride in baking and cooking and sewing. Just feels good
I've made the same observation myself in the past few years....that the "domestic arts" have been lost, and that our generation is rebuilding with only a threadbare bit of knowledge. In some ways the last 2 years has been hard, but necessary.
It's not lost per se. We can find a lot! In old housekeeping books and interviews and videos. In the age of information, there is a lot out there for everyone who is willing. What is no teachable, is the attitude necessairy. You need to be willing to be the emotional core of the family. To put the family first and put your ego aside. The amazing thing is, if you can do this, you will be much greater than if you cling to your ego. Took me years to crack that nut, and I'm still on the journey to act on it. But what has happened to my husband and children since is just amazing. I think this would be much easier if we had living examples near us
She knows when to be serious. She knows when (and how) to be whimsical. She glories in both. She stays sane by placing her hopes in Jesus. Taken together it's called wisdom.
She’s absolutely hypocritical. She misrepresents feminism as anti homemaker. She calls women who fought for ur right to vote Karens. She disses Marry Shelly who fought to not have her book published under a mans name while this woman has been afforded the right to do just that?? Shes speaking on a platform as a woman due to the first wave feminists at the very least……even if we dismiss feminism since. If u don’t understand this, u r extremely sheltered. Feminism does not demand u work outside of the house, it only gives u the choice to do so. It does not tell u not to scrub a floor, only that u have a right to own the floor u scrub if u choose to. If u vote, if u dont support wives being sworn to sex on demand (able to b charged & convicted of not performing the duties of a wife), if u dont support the right of a husband to rape his wife, if u believe u r capable of owning land &/or managing ur own money, then u r a feminist. U might b one that prefers homemaking over corporate ladder climbing but that is perfectly fine. Something this author, this purveyor of propaganda to push an underlying agenda does not want u to know.
Women have the right to chase their dreams. I am a software engineer and an influencer. Glory to God. There is healthy and unhealthy feminism. As a christian I support the former.
I just discovered Rebecca the other day and she is such a treasure! Full of Godly wisdom and laughter! She brings a smile to my face and uplifts my ♥️.
She does the same for me. 😊 If you have not already, I encourage you to check out the podcast they mentioned, “What Have You”. It is pure delight and at the same time has been a tool for discipline and growth in my life.
I have loved all the EIE adjacent content. With this video, specifically, I felt pointedly challenged by the exhortation to be entrepreneurial-not waiting for someone to give me a list. And I am correspondingly so relieved and grateful that Bekah emphasized the real need for practical help. These truths, side by side, are the heart of my current struggle to grow as a woman of God.
I hope women see what all of this “liberation” has led to. Sure we don’t HAVE to be having babies and stay in the kitchen, but we’ve filled it with Botox and fake boobs, being a gym rat, and making excuses for other people cooking for our families 🤦🏻♀️
There's a huge gap between staying in the kitchen / having babies and getting Botox / fake boobs! Most women exist somewhere in the middle, but suffrage and the liberation movement gave us the power to choose for ourselves!
Feminism was founded on full rebellion against God’s creation of the natural roles between men and women. Rebellion against God is always bad. So, yes.
Excellent! Talked about things I've not thought about before...will be buying the book so I can learn more. However, one thing that I've noticed is the ideas and thoughts need to be framed differently. Christian's tend to still copy the speech patterns of the world...we say, "I feel that" a lot. Well, that's Postmodern, ie: this is "my truth". We need to be more definitive in our speech patterns.
She doesn’t acknowledge that these women in the past who asked or demanded that their husbands not dirty the floor they scrubbed were not legally allowed to own that floor. Its not really a difficult situation to comprehend. If it were not for feminism, her book that she authored would literally b published under her father or her husbands name. Women were not allowed to b published as authors. If u want to suggest that u dont agree with the current direction feminism has taken, ok……. But to suggest it was always bad…..as u speak out as a woman & publish books that later become documentaries….is absolutely hypocritical.
The woman was not legally allowed to own that floor, because the woman did not have legal or social responsibility for the upkeep of that floor (beyond its cleanliness). The woman would not publish under her own name, because if her words upset somebody, her father or her husband bore the risk of that upset. The right to do something something is always supposed to accompany proportionate responsibilities. Feminism has not only consistently lobbied for rights without responsibilities, feminism has also consistently *blocked* real solutions to problems by downplaying or ignoring women's responsibilities, and treat the discussion of any issue as if it were a zero sum game. For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about voting rights, not only did women already have plenty of lobbying power before women's suffrage, many of them didn't *want* the right to vote for any number of reasons. Many of the suffragettes then also immediately turned around and marched *against* universal male suffrage (which was, incidentally, only granted once those classes of men promised to bend their necks to the yoke of conscription).
@@dotwarner17 Can u provide the evidence of this statement "Many of the suffragettes then also immediately turned around and marched against universal male suffrage (which was, incidentally, only granted once those classes of men promised to bend their necks to the yoke of conscription)." I can only find a satirical response by the suffragette Alice Duer Miller in response to women who opposed suffrages.
@@lilarose5512 I may not be able to provide chapter-and-verse to your satisfaction, but if you look up the movements to give [fill in the blank] men the vote you'll see plenty of women in the protests against such. (Which to me, at least, suggests that women have quite a bit of social clout.)
@@dotwarner17 If u are talking about how early suffrages used the fact that BM and non-white man were given the right to vote before white women than I understand. The women that had the clout were rich white women. Even black women at the time realized that they were not their friends especially since some affiliated themselves with known white supremacists. I didnt even know black women participates in the movement until recently. Black and latino women who were active in the movement didnt even have the ability to vote in some locations despite white women having the right.
Do u not vote?? Do u leave such opportunities to men??? Im sincerely curious. U just said that history never smiles on those who claim a certain class of humans r not entitled to rights……..While u describe first wave feminists as karens??? U make their protests out to b a joke. Yet, they were human beings being denied equality. Wow. This is weird & extremely void of any consistency.
I know this is off topic but what do you think about coat hangers. I did research and found out it stands for abtion some thing. So is it considered sinful to use it?
...and when the pasta grandmas are done making that meal YOU KNOW everyone has to gather around and eat. It's a family tie. Ask me... a guy who has an Italian grandma.
One more negative comment: it must b nice to have so much opportunity that u can literally dismiss those who fought for ur freedom. Wow!! How can a person b this entitled?? Seriously. Is she really unaware that many women r mistreated by the men in their lives?? Good for her that the men in her life have provided so much support……but that is called luck. Being in the right place at the right time.
Dumfries Spearhead U have to be careful when applying race to this particular entitlement. Yes there is entitlement attached to race & the opposite which is lack of opportunity due to race, but, when considering how some men choose to treat women, a racial connection would imply that men of color r more inclined to mistreating women. U may b suggesting that women of color r at higher risk in general……. This can b framed as true by considering slavery & the historical oppression that followed, but as far as generally speaking, I really dont know. R women of color abused more?? In 2022, I personally hope for us to see these conversations turn to class & income. It seems that poverty is a key thread. When we look into the lives of the poor, of any race, we see the same negatives: violence, substance abuse, crime, fewer opportunities, decrease in quality of education, & domestic violence. I grew up in a poor midwestern white environment & later as an adult found personal relationships with those living in just the opposite (black urban neighborhoods) & we certainly bonded over many of the same experiences.
Women already had a vote. They wanted to be seperated from the men and have a personal vote instead of taking a vote as a family. And the feminist movement has and always will be about destruction of the family unit, and unironically destroying womanhood at the same time. So yea it was bad
@@DM-dk7js folks are so silly. She made a statement and folks here jumped to assume she opposes women's right to vote. Did you read her book? I haven't yet, but I want to. I'm juggling five books at the moment, but I'll get to it eventually. In the mean time, can you show enough maturity and emotional intelligence to allow the author to make her points and let them sit in your mind, even for just a moment, before launching your diatribe against what you THINK she's stating? I can. 👍🏻
I'm about eleven minutes into watching this thing, whatever it might be. How many times has either of the talkers used, or should I call it "MISUSED" the word "like"? I have no actual count, but I know that the count is far more than is useful or necessary! Would some one, at some place, please consult a standard dictionary (which would be a printed book), for meanings assigned to the word "like"? Is the word a verb, usually? I believe so. Is it an adjective of the positive or the comparative degree? I think it can be. But you both, with uncountable others, use the word as if it is an interjection or an otherwise "NOTHING" word or sound, which it most assuredly is NOT! If you do not wish to communicate, please let us know that before you begin not to communicate. Thank you. Thank you, John Prine, for "Onomatopoeia, I don't want to see you, speaking in a foreign tongue".
Totally disagree. Women's suffrage and concomitant abolition in the 1800s was not evil and all bad. Indeed many who championed these were Christians and did so out of Christian conviction. Merkle pokes at Elizabeth Cady Stanton for having her maiden name as her middle name? What she asked was that she be referred to as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, not Mrs. Henry Stanton. Merkle herself does the same thing. She doesn't go by her husband's name but publishes under Rebecca - her own identity. I find that disingenuous. Would Merkle also recommend rolling back a married woman's right to own property? If she is against all things feminist, she should put everything, house, cars, bank accounts only in her husband's name. Lead the way!
@@lesliegonzalez2858 And many start movements out of biblical conviction. Your statement is so abstract as to be unhelpful in this discussion. Specifically, do you disagree that women should have the rights that came out of suffrage and abolition? Another example: should women abstain from voting because the roots of suffrage are feminist and bad according to Merkle?
Ed Benjamin, I'm confused by your reply. Rebecca uses her husband's last name. She doesn't publish as Rebecca Wison Merkle. Is that what you meant? I think what's at issue is that we don't really understand "right to vote". Yes, landowners were the ones with a right to vote. Husbands were voting on behalf of their wives or for the family. My husband and I discuss quite a bit regarding elections and who is running and I so respect his viewpoints and how much more he knows about those running both our state and country. He has more time to listen to all sorts of political shows because of driving to and from work and listening to different things during the day as he works. So I would be more than happy for him to vote for the both of us or on behalf of our family. I do agree that single women should also be able to vote so in that respect I'm glad women can vote. But to know about the women who started the feminist movement they hated their children, hated their families, were so bitter about not being a man. I surely don't want my daughters viewing them as a role model of any sort!
@@edbenjamin5136 Look at what women have voted for since then. If you’re a feminist liberal or a weak man then you would find this offensive. Women should not vote or have any dominion or authority over men. If you actually read the Bible then you would know that and read what early feminists actually believed and what they said you would probably feel differently. If you actually agreed with them and the Marxist and Jezebel beliefs then that’s your problem. Margret Sanger just to name one probably not the woman to look up to.
@@christinebubb6658 Exactly! The only thing is many single women are very easily brainwashed by the media and would vote for extreme liberal anti godly policies.
@@00teatime that’s none of your business tho, if they’re “out of control”. Worry about YOURSELF. Mind your own business. You guys are proving my point. You do not even realize how their lives are NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS 🤦🏻♂️
Rebekah Merkle’s new documentary, “Eve in Exile” is streaming now!
mycanonplus.com/tabs/discover/pages/eve-in-exile
Why is it that a Protestant Supreme Court passed Roe v Wade while a Catholic Supreme Court has to clean up your mess? Historically, the Protestant countries all legalized abortion first. Catholic countries like South America and Philippines and Poland have stayed strong. Feminism is chaos and exclusively a creation of Protestantism. Chaos breeds chaos.
As a historian and housewife who loves watching "pasta grannies" and "tamale abuelas" on youtube, I absolutley love this!
Oooh, I didn't know about Tamale Abuelas. Will check it out, thank you!
I adore pasta grannies and it has greatly increased my motivation to make pasta myself😊
I?m a housewife and I take a lot of pride in baking and cooking and sewing. Just feels good
@@MrsYasha1984 right? I actually love being barefoot in the kitchen.
@@MrsYasha1984 ruclips.net/video/g1c70716aWU/видео.html. I love this abuela
I love watching older women cooking Mexican food on RUclips also lol! De mi rancho a tu cocina and Jauja Cocina are some of my favorite lol
@@jjgems5909 same!
I've made the same observation myself in the past few years....that the "domestic arts" have been lost, and that our generation is rebuilding with only a threadbare bit of knowledge. In some ways the last 2 years has been hard, but necessary.
Well said!
Same! So much creativity to be had and I didn't even see it in that way.
The irony is that these career women try to "play" housewife and love it :P
It's not lost per se.
We can find a lot! In old housekeeping books and interviews and videos. In the age of information, there is a lot out there for everyone who is willing.
What is no teachable, is the attitude necessairy. You need to be willing to be the emotional core of the family. To put the family first and put your ego aside. The amazing thing is, if you can do this, you will be much greater than if you cling to your ego.
Took me years to crack that nut, and I'm still on the journey to act on it. But what has happened to my husband and children since is just amazing.
I think this would be much easier if we had living examples near us
@@MrsYasha1984 any book recommendations?
She knows when to be serious. She knows when (and how) to be whimsical. She glories in both. She stays sane by placing her hopes in Jesus.
Taken together it's called wisdom.
She’s absolutely hypocritical. She misrepresents feminism as anti homemaker. She calls women who fought for ur right to vote Karens. She disses Marry Shelly who fought to not have her book published under a mans name while this woman has been afforded the right to do just that?? Shes speaking on a platform as a woman due to the first wave feminists at the very least……even if we dismiss feminism since. If u don’t understand this, u r extremely sheltered. Feminism does not demand u work outside of the house, it only gives u the choice to do so. It does not tell u not to scrub a floor, only that u have a right to own the floor u scrub if u choose to. If u vote, if u dont support wives being sworn to sex on demand (able to b charged & convicted of not performing the duties of a wife), if u dont support the right of a husband to rape his wife, if u believe u r capable of owning land &/or managing ur own money, then u r a feminist. U might b one that prefers homemaking over corporate ladder climbing but that is perfectly fine. Something this author, this purveyor of propaganda to push an underlying agenda does not want u to know.
Women have the right to chase their dreams. I am a software engineer and an influencer. Glory to God. There is healthy and unhealthy feminism. As a christian I support the former.
Did you say healthy feminism. Cringe. 😩
I just discovered Rebecca the other day and she is such a treasure! Full of Godly wisdom and laughter! She brings a smile to my face and uplifts my ♥️.
She does the same for me. 😊 If you have not already, I encourage you to check out the podcast they mentioned, “What Have You”. It is pure delight and at the same time has been a tool for discipline and growth in my life.
Me too.
And get sister is just as wise and fun.
Is that a podcast? “sister”? I’m a little confused.
I have loved all the EIE adjacent content. With this video, specifically, I felt pointedly challenged by the exhortation to be entrepreneurial-not waiting for someone to give me a list. And I am correspondingly so relieved and grateful that Bekah emphasized the real need for practical help. These truths, side by side, are the heart of my current struggle to grow as a woman of God.
The Proverbs 31 lady has all kinds of sidelines.
I hope women see what all of this “liberation” has led to. Sure we don’t HAVE to be having babies and stay in the kitchen, but we’ve filled it with Botox and fake boobs, being a gym rat, and making excuses for other people cooking for our families 🤦🏻♀️
There's a huge gap between staying in the kitchen / having babies and getting Botox / fake boobs! Most women exist somewhere in the middle, but suffrage and the liberation movement gave us the power to choose for ourselves!
@@aallen5256 women vote for terrible policies and politicians.
@@Charles.Wright Thanks Charles, I’ll let them all know!
@@Charles.Wright, lol, sexist much.
Training the sourdough to be tough, didnt want it to be soft 🤣🤣 that joke might have just sold me to buy her book 🤣
This was great; let’s have lots more of these. Thanks, you guys!
Feminism was founded on full rebellion against God’s creation of the natural roles between men and women. Rebellion against God is always bad. So, yes.
No, the roles you are referring to are not Biblical. Male is not the leader of woman.
@@karenwhitney4826 OK, Karen (literally)
Excellent! Talked about things I've not thought about before...will be buying the book so I can learn more.
However, one thing that I've noticed is the ideas and thoughts need to be framed differently. Christian's tend to still copy the speech patterns of the world...we say, "I feel that" a lot. Well, that's Postmodern, ie: this is "my truth". We need to be more definitive in our speech patterns.
I think we were always jumping from one story to the next but after 2 years of the same story...we happen to notice it now!!!
its definately not just women who need to learn therse arts, men have forgoten most manly arts aswell.
"A sissy starter" is so much funnier than the interviewer realized.
What is this NYT business, and why haven't I heard about it???
Jake's Canon Calls face reveal.
Ahhh HELL YEAH!
Yes!
She doesn’t acknowledge that these women in the past who asked or demanded that their husbands not dirty the floor they scrubbed were not legally allowed to own that floor. Its not really a difficult situation to comprehend. If it were not for feminism, her book that she authored would literally b published under her father or her husbands name. Women were not allowed to b published as authors. If u want to suggest that u dont agree with the current direction feminism has taken, ok…….
But to suggest it was always bad…..as u speak out as a woman & publish books that later become documentaries….is absolutely hypocritical.
The woman was not legally allowed to own that floor, because the woman did not have legal or social responsibility for the upkeep of that floor (beyond its cleanliness). The woman would not publish under her own name, because if her words upset somebody, her father or her husband bore the risk of that upset.
The right to do something something is always supposed to accompany proportionate responsibilities. Feminism has not only consistently lobbied for rights without responsibilities, feminism has also consistently *blocked* real solutions to problems by downplaying or ignoring women's responsibilities, and treat the discussion of any issue as if it were a zero sum game.
For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about voting rights, not only did women already have plenty of lobbying power before women's suffrage, many of them didn't *want* the right to vote for any number of reasons. Many of the suffragettes then also immediately turned around and marched *against* universal male suffrage (which was, incidentally, only granted once those classes of men promised to bend their necks to the yoke of conscription).
Also, she is technically not using "her own name", she is using her father's. :)
@@dotwarner17 Can u provide the evidence of this statement "Many of the suffragettes then also immediately turned around and marched against universal male suffrage (which was, incidentally, only granted once those classes of men promised to bend their necks to the yoke of conscription)." I can only find a satirical response by the suffragette Alice Duer Miller in response to women who opposed suffrages.
@@lilarose5512 I may not be able to provide chapter-and-verse to your satisfaction, but if you look up the movements to give [fill in the blank] men the vote you'll see plenty of women in the protests against such. (Which to me, at least, suggests that women have quite a bit of social clout.)
@@dotwarner17 If u are talking about how early suffrages used the fact that BM and non-white man were given the right to vote before white women than I understand. The women that had the clout were rich white women. Even black women at the time realized that they were not their friends especially since some affiliated themselves with known white supremacists. I didnt even know black women participates in the movement until recently. Black and latino women who were active in the movement didnt even have the ability to vote in some locations despite white women having the right.
The church list she’s talking about is from an upcoming Cultish episode that they were starting to research. So they posted the list on social media.
Peace Like a River is SO good! (Just sayin)
I lament the replacement of " I Think" with "I Feel Like "...
Loving my Canon+!
My word, that guy can’t stop talking over her! Wish he would stay quiet and just let her speak.
Do u not vote?? Do u leave such opportunities to men??? Im sincerely curious.
U just said that history never smiles on those who claim a certain class of humans r not entitled to rights……..While u describe first wave feminists as karens??? U make their protests out to b a joke. Yet, they were human beings being denied equality. Wow. This is weird & extremely void of any consistency.
I'd have lived to hear explanations of history, rather than hints. Google is still here, but I'm not sure they'll tell me.
I spy an awesome Sheologians mug
This is all so liberating - lovely
I know this is off topic but what do you think about coat hangers. I did research and found out it stands for abtion some thing. So is it considered sinful to use it?
...and when the pasta grandmas are done making that meal YOU KNOW everyone has to gather around and eat. It's a family tie. Ask me... a guy who has an Italian grandma.
Could you please enable captions?
It takes RUclips a few hours to generate captions, but as soon as they're generated, they'll be enabled.
Commenting for algorithm
Replying to reduce chance of shadowbanninonsense
One more negative comment: it must b nice to have so much opportunity that u can literally dismiss those who fought for ur freedom. Wow!! How can a person b this entitled?? Seriously. Is she really unaware that many women r mistreated by the men in their lives??
Good for her that the men in her life have provided so much support……but that is called luck. Being in the right place at the right time.
And the right colour too.
Dumfries Spearhead U have to be careful when applying race to this particular entitlement. Yes there is entitlement attached to race & the opposite which is lack of opportunity due to race, but, when considering how some men choose to treat women, a racial connection would imply that men of color r more inclined to mistreating women. U may b suggesting that women of color r at higher risk in general…….
This can b framed as true by considering slavery & the historical oppression that followed, but as far as generally speaking, I really dont know. R women of color abused more?? In 2022, I personally hope for us to see these conversations turn to class & income. It seems that poverty is a key thread. When we look into the lives of the poor, of any race, we see the same negatives: violence, substance abuse, crime, fewer opportunities, decrease in quality of education, & domestic violence. I grew up in a poor midwestern white environment & later as an adult found personal relationships with those living in just the opposite (black urban neighborhoods) & we certainly bonded over many of the same experiences.
God help us; God protect us; God love us; and most of all God forgive me and us lol
"Woe to you who are well fed." Ahem, are you all listening up there in Idaho or whatever bread basket you're living in, Canon?
It would help if you were more explicit about what you are criticising about 1st way feminism. Do you think women getting the vote was a bad thing?
It wasn't only about the vote. Guess you'll need to read her book. 🤔
Women already had a vote. They wanted to be seperated from the men and have a personal vote instead of taking a vote as a family. And the feminist movement has and always will be about destruction of the family unit, and unironically destroying womanhood at the same time. So yea it was bad
@@heatherwoods5703 you didn’t answer her question.
@@heatherwoods5703 Do you not want the right to vote?
@@DM-dk7js folks are so silly. She made a statement and folks here jumped to assume she opposes women's right to vote. Did you read her book? I haven't yet, but I want to. I'm juggling five books at the moment, but I'll get to it eventually. In the mean time, can you show enough maturity and emotional intelligence to allow the author to make her points and let them sit in your mind, even for just a moment, before launching your diatribe against what you THINK she's stating?
I can. 👍🏻
So much of what is facing society is again going to be given life and structure by Christianity...our connectivity to the Giver of Life
I'm about eleven minutes into watching this thing, whatever it might be. How many times has either of the talkers used, or should I call it "MISUSED" the word "like"? I have no actual count, but I know that the count is far more than is useful or necessary! Would some one, at some place, please consult a standard dictionary (which would be a printed book), for meanings assigned to the word "like"? Is the word a verb, usually? I believe so. Is it an adjective of the positive or the comparative degree? I think it can be. But you both, with uncountable others, use the word as if it is an interjection or an otherwise "NOTHING" word or sound, which it most assuredly is NOT! If you do not wish to communicate, please let us know that before you begin not to communicate. Thank you. Thank you, John Prine, for "Onomatopoeia, I don't want to see you, speaking in a foreign tongue".
Are you ok?
"Like" is a filler word in the American dialect. It like when people say "ammmm" when the are thinking for something to say.
Totally disagree. Women's suffrage and concomitant abolition in the 1800s was not evil and all bad. Indeed many who championed these were Christians and did so out of Christian conviction. Merkle pokes at Elizabeth Cady Stanton for having her maiden name as her middle name? What she asked was that she be referred to as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, not Mrs. Henry Stanton. Merkle herself does the same thing. She doesn't go by her husband's name but publishes under Rebecca - her own identity. I find that disingenuous. Would Merkle also recommend rolling back a married woman's right to own property? If she is against all things feminist, she should put everything, house, cars, bank accounts only in her husband's name. Lead the way!
Many join movements in the name of Christianity and are anything but because everyone is a Christian until it gets biblical.
@@lesliegonzalez2858 And many start movements out of biblical conviction. Your statement is so abstract as to be unhelpful in this discussion. Specifically, do you disagree that women should have the rights that came out of suffrage and abolition? Another example: should women abstain from voting because the roots of suffrage are feminist and bad according to Merkle?
Ed Benjamin, I'm confused by your reply. Rebecca uses her husband's last name. She doesn't publish as Rebecca Wison Merkle. Is that what you meant? I think what's at issue is that we don't really understand "right to vote". Yes, landowners were the ones with a right to vote. Husbands were voting on behalf of their wives or for the family. My husband and I discuss quite a bit regarding elections and who is running and I so respect his viewpoints and how much more he knows about those running both our state and country. He has more time to listen to all sorts of political shows because of driving to and from work and listening to different things during the day as he works. So I would be more than happy for him to vote for the both of us or on behalf of our family. I do agree that single women should also be able to vote so in that respect I'm glad women can vote. But to know about the women who started the feminist movement they hated their children, hated their families, were so bitter about not being a man. I surely don't want my daughters viewing them as a role model of any sort!
@@edbenjamin5136 Look at what women have voted for since then. If you’re a feminist liberal or a weak man then you would find this offensive. Women should not vote or have any dominion or authority over men. If you actually read the Bible then you would know that and read what early feminists actually believed and what they said you would probably feel differently. If you actually agreed with them and the Marxist and Jezebel beliefs then that’s your problem. Margret Sanger just to name one probably not the woman to look up to.
@@christinebubb6658 Exactly! The only thing is many single women are very easily brainwashed by the media and would vote for extreme liberal anti godly policies.
We get it. You guys fear losing control of women.
If women chose to kill their unborn children, then they deserve to have their bodily autonomy taken away. Unfortunate but it must happen.
They are already out of control. That's the whole point of the book Sherlock.
We get it, you don't like their videos.
😂
@@00teatime that’s none of your business tho, if they’re “out of control”. Worry about YOURSELF. Mind your own business.
You guys are proving my point. You do not even realize how their lives are NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS 🤦🏻♂️