(reply coming from a 9 year old) I give the paw patrol movie a 71/100, not surely their best, but still entertaining piece of cinematography. the sequel however is dogshit (no pun inteded) yes they made a sequel and I recommend not to watch it without proper safety precautions (For the youtube mods that think that I'm insulting someone: no, I'm not insulting someone, I'm criticising a movie. Movies are not living beings.)
@@laxative_goofy i mean those aren’t really good examples. Real ones are childs play 2, every friday the 13th movie aside from goes to hell and takes manhattan, and saw. Genuinely good movies have such shitty numbers
Here’s the thing with critics. Enjoying movies made for a younger demographic and preferring them over other movies of the same type is fine! It’s just how cinema works. The problem arises when they think their movie tastes are superior to others’. They love using the word “objectively”, when it is *their* opinion they’re stating. That’s pretentious.
Passing off subjective stuff as objective pisses me off to no end. No, CinemaSins - just because a logo existed for 1 second longer than you expected it to doesn't make it the worst movie of all time. EDIT: Oh, god-did I just start a chain reaction?
@@BlueBolt5000No, Mauler, just because you found a plot hole in a movie and described why it’s a plot hole for two hours doesn’t mean it’s an objectively bad movie
@@BlueBolt5000 No, YMS. Just because you personally didn't find a joke in a kids movie funny doesn't mean it was cynically engineered to be memed somehow.
@carlosmattessich3883 I mean I can say the exact same about this guy and "man carrying things" when they make critics bad video. Doesn't that mean you should hate this video? Also, would you please point me to these critics? Cause they must be hiding from me. And for the love of God the merciful and great don't name ones just because they make an hour analyses.
@@TheRealLegoDocOck Really? This guy just replied to a comment about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a kids movie then pausing the tv with a remote? Absolutely pointless and unnecessary!!! This is on a new level of unrealism!!
We're going back in time to the first thanks giving to get turkey off the menu.... That's Right W'ERE GOING BACK IN TIME TO THE FIRST THANKS GIVING TO GET TURKEY OFF THE MENU.
@@WS48L Really???? You just replied to criticize a reply to a comment about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a kids movie then pausing the tv with a remote? Do you have a life??????
@@creepyone3348 Really?????? You replied to the replier who replied on a comment about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a kids movie then pausing the tv with a remote?? How slanderous!!!!!11!
"I hate how movies now are always trying to shove their politics down our throats!" *proceeds to go on a totally not biased political rambling in their review that no one needed to hear*
SO TRUE, they'll start the review like "stop brainwashing the children, can't we enjoy things without getting political?!" and then go "the Fairyland monarchy is romanticising colonizers" or "it's highly unrealistic for minorities to live in Europe, get woke go broke" 🙄
This is like my brother highlighting how unrealistic the kid comedy movies are AS my 7 yr old son is watching them at home (with interrupting comments during the funnier/more interesting parts as my son's trying to enjoy them) - IT'S ENTERTAINMENT! lol
You mean like most critics with kids movies, these are the same people that criticised a movie about Mario for not having a super deep plot. What the hell.
@@n0ta_cat797 Most actual critics are not like that. As the saying goes, "anyone can be a critic" (meant to be read sarcastically)--but not everyone is capable of critique. Critics are why your favorite shows and movies are as good as they are. If we were always complacent, we would never see change or progress or diversity. Criticism is the lifeblood of all art. Criticism is why we grow. Also, not enjoying the Mario movie for not having a deeper plot is perfectly valid. Does that make it a bad movie? No. It just means they didn't like it. It's okay not to like things for certain reasons, no matter how shallow. I like all kinds of bad movies, and I dislike plenty of good ones. That's just how I roll. You roll your own way. We all do.
Reminded me of watching a Cars movie critic where I expect him shit talk about it hilariously like Schaff did but instead he goes on minutes long rambling about logistics and world building of CARS about how it would not work.
One of the things I like about modern kids movies is that there seems to be more that start to have a bit more in depth of a plot and more emotional meaning. A good kids movie is a movie kids can enjoy, a great kids movie is a movie anyone can enjoy.
"It's just a kids movie" "It might be kids movie but it still deserves to be criticized if it has flaws. You guys always expect to be exempted. Remember, we are also against nitpicking." *proceeds to post an hour long video ranting about historically inaccurate gowns and not having dark themes like death, childhood trauma, passage of time and old age as a must ingredient because lack of it means mindless crap*
Children aren't blind to critics. So mant adults see children as just a superficial product of no reasoning, judgement or deep character, and I'm shocked one could forget, because we were kids once, right? The problem with children is that they aren't as developed in articulating and delivering their understandings and ideas to the outside world. Children have a rich inside of ideas, fantasy, deep thoughts and complexity. Kids sees/feels quality, but they find it hard to communicate their feedback; this can be demonstrated in their long-term behavior where it becomes clearer. A bad childrens movie is a bad childrens movie; theres no excuse for it being bad: holding weak plot, conflicts, development and so on. Children deserve to be taken seriously and be given the best of cinematics, not pushed aside and given garbage content. Here are some examples of good children movies: Shrek, The lion King, Inside Out, Spirited away, Frozen, Charlie and the chocolate factory, Narnia and lots more. Don't disrespect quality and it's importance. Children deserve to be nurtured and raised with care. Critiquing movies are a must and not stupid if you want feedback and improvement.
Dude yeah I was a child once too. And I had no idea what was good or not. A lot of the content I loved was garbage when I looked back I think it’s pretty undeniable that kids have a different view of what’s good and not good. I used to see what my mom would watch and I’d think it was garbage and yet it was an Oscar winning movie. Sure, I enjoyed the objectively good things too, but no more than the bad ones, bc it was all good to me
@@ajakakakak In one's long-term behavior you'll notice which movies a child keep getting back to, and it shows. For me it was Shrek, The Lion King, Monster Inc, Toy story and Harry Potter movies. I watch other movies too that are concidered bad, and the interessting thing is that the bad ones for me were just as good as the ones that I mentioned, in my childish opinion. But as I said, your behavior reveals your reflected *TRUE* opinion; what movies you come back to, over time, gives away your behavior and it shows that you are sensitive to good quality, just not fully aware of it yet.
@@ajakakakak*Time* reveals your *True* opinion, even if you are not conscious of it. A child may say he likes all movies equally, but ends up coming back to, more often, to the higher quality ones (as preferred). This is what "behavior" reveals. This is how quality is precious. We are only a product of our thoughts; so we should be mindful of what we build ourselves with.
Man, people just cant have fun anymore dude! Also I love these little short skits, its like Vine or something idk, basically its just cool to me and funny
@dreamsz.yeah, though at the same time kids a lot of the times don’t have the same perspective of good or bad older people do. I remember a lot of movies I loved when I was little only to rewatch them when I was older and be like “damn this sucks”
These guys have a RUclips channel with a poorly drawn mascot that they put into their thumbnails with an angry face with giant captions that just say “TRASH” or something. They also give bad reviews to anything they didn’t grow up with as a child. Either that or they just copy word for word what some other critic says about it.
Exactly I thought I was going insane, so many critics are just pumping out hate reviews fuelled by nostalgia bias, to them anything that they didn't grow up with is worse than dogshit
@charlesbradshaw5183 These are the same people that hate Family Guy and Fanboy and ChumChum for “being too mean spirited” and “fetish fuel.” Yet, they will praise whatever they grew up with for the same things.
@Ichangemypfpeverymonth I remember this one animation review channel that claimed that Moden Family Guy is the worst thing ever made due to being "too meanspirited." Yet, he would praise South Park and Invader Zim for doing the same things as Family Guy.
I felt this for the most recent video game movies which are vast improvements to what video game movies used to be such as Detective Pickachu, Sonic, the Mario movie, and the FNaF movie. Do these films have their flaws? God yes, they do. Does that make them complete ass/the worst movies that year like some critics make them out to be? No. Sometimes movies can just be fun. Not everything needs a deep message or be a cinematic masterpiece.
Most critics I've seen actually like all those movies. I tend to just ignore the reviewers whose opinions I don't like. Because that's what it boils down to, opinion. That's why even EFAP can disagree amongst each other from time to time.
The Mario Movie and FNAF Movie are heavily flawed and got the low ratings they deserve. Detective Pikachu and Sonic got high ratings and understandably so, unlike Mario and FNAF the plot isn't just hyperactive nonsense
I don't know what they said about Detective Pikachu but I remember they actually liked the (first) Sonic movie, which was a breath of fresh air for Sonic fans who had a bone to pick with gaming journalism before it was cool
I love a lot of movies from my childhood. But I also love watching people rip kid's movies to shreds, especially the genuinely bad ones. Sue me but Danny Gonzalez's jokes as he annihilated Spookly, the Square Pumpkin, will forever make me busy a gut laughing😂
As a critic I do confirm we break into the theatres with a remote to control the film and scream on the top of our lungs about the movie’s minor inconsistencies
This joke doesn’t make sense. I genuinely pray on your downfall. Normally, I’m not religious, but from here on out, every time I wake up, your downfall will be there. Every time, I eat lunch, your downfall will be mentioned. Every time, I eat supper, YOUR DOWNFALL WILL BE REMEMBERED.
@@anotherpromotor1. Nobody cares. 2. The joke is very understandable, I believe that you wrote this comment on purpose for no reason and to get a reaction. Is this all some joke to you?
Or, it’s just simply bad. While I enjoyed the Mario movie, the pacing was a huge issue and the film’s quality suffered because of it. The “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie was connected to the games only by its lore. Every other ingredient that made it viral, including suspense, scares, and atmosphere, were absent. The acting was also pretty stiff. Just about every other video game adaptation besides those two were just completely disconnected from the source material, so I’ll provide no input. This video is funny because the film critic is overreacting at a film targeted exclusively towards toddlers. Video game movies, while mainly aimed to children, connect with more than that demographic. And they, unfortunately, fail to be much more than cheap fan service. I have heard that the “Fallout” show tries to do something more appropriate for its franchise, so I will have to check that one out.
@@noobmasterruben5167 I bet you think horror movies need to be rated R to be good because all you like is blood and gore It did have suspense and dread but noooo you just want gore left and right
The critics made me feel like Super Mario Bros Movie would be mid but I absolutely loved it when watching. That's not my fault that they have never played Mario games
Even if people never played the Mario games, they will enjoy it if they expose themselves with positive energy. My parents do not play Mario games yet they loved the movie. We had conversations about the Mario game references afterwards.
The story wasn't anything mind-blowing, true, but critics are judging it for what it is and many give it a fair score. We have emotional ties to Mario because of nostalgia, so the emotional payoff is more intense for us. It's at least decent when viewed critically, and that's fine. Truly incredible movies are rare, but I donçt know anyone who can honestly say Puss In Boots: The Last Wish was objectively bad.
I hate when people say "it's a kids movie!!" like it can't be critiqued like any other movie. You can still critique story, morale, characters, animation etc. Don't get me wrong, I am not target audience, but there are still good kids movies and bad kids movies. Isn't it kinda... obvious? Not saying you have to nitpick every little detail, it sounds petty, but still, you want the best for your kid, you want for him to have fun and learn improtant lessons. Maybe it's better to show him Spirited Away or Toy Story and not Sausage Party (it's 6 am, come with "it's a bad kids movie" yourself)
Very true. It shows a level of disrespect towards children I feel like? Like they don’t deserve quality or something. Also there’s a lot of overlap between people who say « it’s just a kids’ movie » and people who tends to think animation = made for kids. Which… no? Art is art, some of it is made for kids and some isn’t, but there should be no hierarchy between the forms it takes. On the other hand, what I _do_ get tired of is when people refuse to suspend their disbelief and try to critique stories that are clearly meant to be fairytales through a solely realistic lense (as depicted in this short with the critic getting upset at the use of a magic wand). To use a real life example, remember when people kept pointing out how, in « be our guest » from Beauty and the Beast, there were entirely too many dancing pieces of furniture and that the Beast couldn’t possibly have had that many servants? Like fellas… this is a metaphorical animated fairytale with big musical numbers, and the dancing furniture is part of the _decor._ Complaining about this is like saying that characters in musical spontaneously bursting into song is unrealistic because it doesn’t happen in real life. Of course it doesn’t happen in real life, it’s not like the authors are unaware of it! Disney especially gets a lot of these criticisms, but the worst part is, they listen to it! That’s how we get those terrible live-action remakes where all the charm and magic in sucked out for the sake of « realism », because _obviously_ having your movie feature _charm_ or _colour_ or, God forbid, being ANIMATED is not mature enough and won’t please the weird realism fetishists, which are apparently our target audience now??? Ugh, sorry I got off-track lol, I’m just still very bitter about live-action Disney remakes and the general disdain for animation and anything sincere and not gritty enough. ^^’
@@mr.machine3328 True lol, I remember a lot of parents getting upset at its content because it was « inappropriate for kids » but like,,, if you haven’t looked at the rating that’s on you. x) Again, too many people assume that animation = made for kids…
@@viveleshistoires4874 Speaking as an elder Millennial, it kind of surprises me whenever I hear someone still say that, because when I was a kid that was WAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY worse. I guess sometimes some people still get that attitude, but overall things have come a long, long way.
@@Marbles471 Yeah I guess it’s gotten better in a way, which I’m grateful for…. ^^’ Again though, Disney’s current trend of remaking animated movies in live action and labelling them as « more mature » seems to be giving this philosophy a resurgence. x)
i was honestly about to comment something like "he used a towel to represent a little girl? that makes no sense im unsubbing" and then the end played and i felt so powerful for a second
Kids' media doesn't need to have all criticism handwaved with a "it's for kids-" that's how kids' media got to be so bad in the first place. Children aren't idiots.
I bet you're one of those people who hyper-analyzes kids movies and sucks all the fun out of them. The reality is, most kids' media is actually enjoyed by children. The opinions of pretentious adults looking for "Citizen Kane" in a G-rated fairytale doesn't really matter, as long as kids are having fun.
@@ajakakakak You are misunderstanding my point, allow me to reword it: there is media that people see as bad that kids like. I'm not trying to deny that. There's some shows that I don't see the appeal in that are objectively fairly well-written- like Bluey. What I'm talking about is the overall handwave of "it's for kids" preventing any kind of criticism for any children's media, even if it's objectively bad. Look at something like, let's say, Peppa Pig. It is formulaic, samey and actively teaches that throwing a fit makes you get your way. But a lot of criticism of it as a show is thrown away because "it's a kids' show, you're looking too hard into it." Media made for kids needs to be the bare minimum of being enjoyable and a good influence on kids- it doesn't need to be on Citizen Kane levels of plot but it just needs to be something that is base-level good to watch and not actively annoying or harmful.
Children are idiots, they will like anything, it just need to be colorful or animated. We just had the luck that we are born in the time that the producers put some effort in the cartoons
@@shawerful5209 I mean not really some kids are but more often the case is children will tolerate anything it doesn't mean they'll like it. Like on cartoon network as a kid I would get super excited when adventure time came on and get annoyed whenever they would air something like teen titans go and my opinion on either of those shows hasn't really changed in adulthood. Its pretty easy as a kid to differentiate when a show has the slightest amount of effort put into it or when it doesn't
I also saw maybe the same 30 minute film analysis on Sofia the First and how it had the best villain redemption arc, by a guy called Rockotar. It was suprisingly entertaining.
Dont forget them saying that it being for kids is not an excuse for bad writing because the lion king is great even though that was a high budget family movie and not a direct to dvd preschool aged cartoon
I mean at least he gave it a chance, unlike that one Oscar movie reviewer who refused to watch Into the Spider-Verse because it's animated and "for kids" and not any real cinema or whatever the fuck. I really think a good critic needs to just know to criticise something for what it is instead of what it isn't. This dude tried to make beef wellington out of a chicken nugget film.
That second paragraph is so real. A lot of critics don't seem to realise that just because something isn't to their taste, it's not a personal attack or inherently bad 💀
this was literally me as a kid tho i got so mad at plot contrivances and made fun of stupid parts of kids movies/shows relentlessly everyone hated me for it
To be honest, i agree to some people (especially in the case of crittics) that just because it's for kids doesn't mean it should pander or dumbdown towards the audiences and be immume to any form of criticism. The problem is however, is that some crittics took things WAY to seriously and expect every pieces of media to have this deep philosophical meaning & stuff rather than just except that not everything gonna be like that & at times people just want to have some you know, FUN. I mean, just look at Tom & Jerry or Looney Toons, both of these show aren't nothing more but filled with Slapstick Comedy and didn't really have an overarching plot, but it nevertheless it still good. Not everything need to be this serious, dark, deep, or complex filled with some stuff that make you thingking all night. Sometimes, we just want to have some fun, and that's basically what the BASIC or MINIMUM purpose of every movie is, TO ENTERTAINT.
The thing with most of these critics is that they just hate anything made for women, and kids, or groups that they aren't apart of. They bitch about anything that isn't tailor made for them.
I love you grant you really helped me during dark times, I remember dressing dressing as Edward Robinson for school on tik tok and you liked the video!❤
Siskel and Ebert liked a ton of movies for kids. They both had Beauty and the Beast in their Top 10 for 1991. Gene Siskel also had The Little Mermaid, Toy Story, and Antz in their respective years. Roger Ebert included movies like Spirited Away and Finding Nemo in his Top 10 lists. Roger even gave Barney's Great Adventure 3/4 stars.
@@xFlareLeon Oh, of course there were.* But that's not my point. Even though Siskel and Ebert were adults, there were still animated movies that they loved. *Roger Ebert's disliked kid movies- sample: 1. North (0 stars) 2. The Jungle Book 2. (1.5/4 stars) 3. Spy Kids 3. (2.5/4 stars.) 4. Hook. (2/4 stars) 5. Flubber. (1/4 stars.) 6. Home Alone. (2.5/4 stars.) 7. Home Alone 2. (2/4 stars.) 8. Thomas and the Magic Railroad. (1/4 stars.) 9. Home on the Range. (2.5/4 stars.) 10. The Princess Diaries. (1.5/4 stars.)
“It’s just a kids movie “ is still the lamest, laziest defense of trash that’s used way too often for content that’s clearly all ages. But yeah, some things are definitely made specifically for kids
Tbf a lot of video game movies had a reputation for being bad prior to the 2020s (like the super Mario bros movie, the 1990s one not the more recent one)
Bit of a Hot Take but just because it's a Video Game movie doesn't mean it has an excuse to have a bad story, especially depending on the game. I expect a simple and dumb plot for a Mario Movie. I do not expect the same for a FNAF movie. Their plot and lore construction is completely different from each other.
@@giantpinkcatthey had to prioritize between being close at all to the original games and community, and having a movie critics would have approved of. I personally believe the FNAF movie made the right choice by prioritizing their fanbase, the people who actually wanted to see it, instead of strangers to the fanbase. Could it have been better? Yeah. But it could have been a whole lot worse! Lol
@@bananabro1010 there's a huge gap between having the tagert audience in mind while making a movie and making a bad movie held together by it being part of a beloved franchise
hate hate hate hate hate Same as video game journalists reviewing games before they even finish. Imagine trying to rate any Soulsborne game after just an hour of playtime because you have articles to write.
This, for some reason, reminded me about how the Rotten Tomatoes critics said that the first Pokémon movie, the one with Mewtwo and Mew, was trash and money-hungry garbage because it didn't follow the game's plot. I reaaaally hate these critics sometimes...
The point is that you shouldn’t critique garbage kids love in front of them and put them down for it. You can critique kids media all you want as long as you’re not bullying literal children as an adult
Legit every film major freshman. Quinton Taratino, Martin Scorsese, Christopher Nolan, and so on being "The best Director"... Oh and many many references to Citizen Kane
10 year old: oh this sonic game is so awesome. It's amazing! 22 year old Sonic Fan: His quills are too short, also his eye texture is only 1080p instead of 4K, also WHY IS HIS MOUTH ON THE FRONT INSTEAD OF THE SIDE????
I still think that all content made for children should be good quality. SpongeBob is a far better piece of content for children to be watching than shit like Cocomelon. But kids nowadays are only being given shitty content like Cocomelon.
Hell if I ever have kids, I’m raising them with the original Dora or Blue’s Clues, something that ACTUALLY benefits them in the long run and not some brain rot shit like cocomelon.
tbf cocoemlon and spongebob is for different age groups, cocomenon is made for infants and spongebob for young kids, i have multiple younger cousins and most of them stopped watching cocomelon at like age 4 and shifted to stuff like peppa pig and paw patrol
Two of his colleagues at the Daily Wire openly loved the Barbie movie (Michael Knowles and Brett Cooper) and Cooper full-blown debated Shapiro about it.
These are the type of dudes who claim a Disney film is garbage because it's too cliche, but then writes a C- writing assignment about a depressed man who learns to find himself after seeing various sex workers.
Funny movie that's so funny and iconic that every joke is remembered for generations: exist The Academy: I'll pretend I didn't watch that and give the Oscar to a movie whose main actor had to lose 30 pounds for his role, even if it's bad
My personal favourite is when people flipflop between "keep politics out of children's media!" and "it's appalling how the King of Fairyland is portrayed as a kind leader when he would CLEARLY be a colonizer irl, also it's unrealistic for minorities to exist in a medieval town"
Learned a long time ago never to listen to critics. Make up your own mind. Watch trailers to get a feel for it or just take a chance. Sometimes you'll get burned, other times you will be pleasantly surprised and other times still, it will be exactly what you expected for better or worse. Point being: decide for yourself whether you like it by taking the experience. No one else, no matter how educated on the subject, has a right to tell you if you should enjoy something or not. You know what you like and you can make the best guess on whether or not something will be for you or not. A critic has to speak for the wider audience as a whole. That doesn't mean shit to an individual, though.
*exactly dude.* they’re calling it a boring, mid-cashgrab plus a video on how to make a cashgrab and villain. Ok, but I wouldn't call it bad. Whenever we watch something, we come back to it only see reviewers trash talk about it. So many opinions these days
This had a plot twist I NEVER saw coming. This is the best cinematography film i have ever seen.
yes
NAHH. I think this was BELOW AVERAGE. I will rate it a 4.3 out of 10 ONLINE.
They couldnt come up with anything better with him pausing the videoing
this is so sigma and alpha and sigma 9.9/10
A comment saying the video was good. HOW DAMN ORIGINAL. OF COURSE ITS A COMMENT WITH “This was so creative!” THEY COULDNT THINK OF ANYTHING ELSE?
Shout out to the film critic who got his 7 year old daughter to review the Paw Patrol movie on his behalf
I read that online really good
Best part was it was a conversation while they were on a train and she saw another one on the way.
(reply coming from a 9 year old)
I give the paw patrol movie a 71/100, not surely their best, but still entertaining piece of cinematography.
the sequel however is dogshit (no pun inteded)
yes they made a sequel and I recommend not to watch it without proper safety precautions
(For the youtube mods that think that I'm insulting someone: no, I'm not insulting someone, I'm criticising a movie. Movies are not living beings.)
@@GabrielParedesOrtiz-c4i Is the 4th line a joke or something? Also, I don't think 9-year-olds should be cussing. It was a nice pun, though.
These are the same critics who give insanely bad reviews for every horror movie. Even ones that are genuinely good
they just getting scared
Horror movies are so underrated my favorite movie is a horror movies
bro fr, they hate jason x,nightmare on elm street 2010, dream child, and freddy vs jason When all those movies are actually alright
@@laxative_goofy i mean those aren’t really good examples.
Real ones are childs play 2, every friday the 13th movie aside from goes to hell and takes manhattan, and saw. Genuinely good movies have such shitty numbers
yes i forgot jason takes manhattan@@susiehaltmann3342
Here’s the thing with critics. Enjoying movies made for a younger demographic and preferring them over other movies of the same type is fine! It’s just how cinema works. The problem arises when they think their movie tastes are superior to others’. They love using the word “objectively”, when it is *their* opinion they’re stating. That’s pretentious.
Passing off subjective stuff as objective pisses me off to no end.
No, CinemaSins - just because a logo existed for 1 second longer than you expected it to doesn't make it the worst movie of all time.
EDIT: Oh, god-did I just start a chain reaction?
@@BlueBolt5000 exactly!
Nah they just some man children fr
@@BlueBolt5000No, Mauler, just because you found a plot hole in a movie and described why it’s a plot hole for two hours doesn’t mean it’s an objectively bad movie
@@BlueBolt5000 No, YMS. Just because you personally didn't find a joke in a kids movie funny doesn't mean it was cynically engineered to be memed somehow.
Maybe they should let the kids criticize the kids movies
Nickelodeon did something like that. Hence the Kids’ Choice Awards existing
@@matityaloran9157oh nice!!!
@benpodvia5744you know like Disney hulu Netflix and many more
I wonder how they'd react to kid me getting nightmares from watching Avatar the last airbender (live action)
@@theoscout9205 “there’s no live action in ba sing se!”
Movie critics and film bros try not to overanalyze challenge (impossible)
movie "critics" try not to bitch about a movie that's obviously not made for them (literally fucking impossible they're demented)
People have been criticising art ever since the first painting was drawn....
@@N.I.A23 Because criticizing is so easy nowadays, you just gotta say “film bad” and somehow expect a crowd to follow you
@carlosmattessich3883 I mean I can say the exact same about this guy and "man carrying things" when they make critics bad video. Doesn't that mean you should hate this video?
Also, would you please point me to these critics? Cause they must be hiding from me. And for the love of God the merciful and great don't name ones just because they make an hour analyses.
it's almost as if it's their job
"like some unnamed film from 1937" the accuracy is through the roof
@weird_mango42 That or they name whatever they grew up with instead.
Do they mean Snow Wh-y do I hear knocking
Anime elitist in a nutshell.
Or some film that was released recently that you straight-up didn't know existed.
Really? He did NOT just make a video about a critic watching a movie critic pausing a movie with a remote! Absolutely ludicrous! 😤
Really? This guy commented about a critic watching a movie critic pause a movie with a remote!!???? This is so Bizarre and unrealistic 😤😤😤
@@TheRealLegoDocOck Really? This guy just replied to a comment about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a kids movie then pausing the tv with a remote? Absolutely pointless and unnecessary!!! This is on a new level of unrealism!!
We're going back in time to the first thanks giving to get turkey off the menu.... That's Right W'ERE GOING BACK IN TIME TO THE FIRST THANKS GIVING TO GET TURKEY OFF THE MENU.
@@WS48L Really???? You just replied to criticize a reply to a comment about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a kids movie then pausing the tv with a remote? Do you have a life??????
@@creepyone3348 Really?????? You replied to the replier who replied on a comment about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a movie about a critic watching a kids movie then pausing the tv with a remote?? How slanderous!!!!!11!
"I hate how movies now are always trying to shove their politics down our throats!"
*proceeds to go on a totally not biased political rambling in their review that no one needed to hear*
Lmaoo ikr
SO TRUE, they'll start the review like "stop brainwashing the children, can't we enjoy things without getting political?!" and then go "the Fairyland monarchy is romanticising colonizers" or "it's highly unrealistic for minorities to live in Europe, get woke go broke" 🙄
I swear some critics will call a movie political if they see one woman in it.
I found the mindless sheep.
IKR, Liberal media is ruining everything.
“HOW DARE YOU HAVE FUN WATCHING AN IMPERFECT MOVIE”
Opinion bashers be like:
Despite the video being funny, just remember that anything and everything can and will be criticized, no matter its quality or intended audience.
seaworld fishcakes
it's almost as if it's their job
Yeah but watching movies for toddlers and getting mad at the plot is just 😬
REAL @@victorlolxd7347 PREACH
You are so right, Steve.
This is like my brother highlighting how unrealistic the kid comedy movies are AS my 7 yr old son is watching them at home (with interrupting comments during the funnier/more interesting parts as my son's trying to enjoy them) - IT'S ENTERTAINMENT! lol
AND its for kids 😂
It's so when people do that, like "Wow you know that talking animals don't exist as an adult man? Want a Nobel price?"
except they actually do... parrots. (or atleast certain species of them) @@jonathanbarkins8480
Damn I just realized I'm guilty of that lol
They are one of the worst people to be around with.
While being a kids’ movie doesn’t make it immune to criticism, nor is it an excuse for being a bad movie, this critic here goes a little too far.
You mean like most critics with kids movies, these are the same people that criticised a movie about Mario for not having a super deep plot. What the hell.
@@n0ta_cat797 Most actual critics are not like that. As the saying goes, "anyone can be a critic" (meant to be read sarcastically)--but not everyone is capable of critique.
Critics are why your favorite shows and movies are as good as they are. If we were always complacent, we would never see change or progress or diversity. Criticism is the lifeblood of all art. Criticism is why we grow.
Also, not enjoying the Mario movie for not having a deeper plot is perfectly valid. Does that make it a bad movie? No. It just means they didn't like it. It's okay not to like things for certain reasons, no matter how shallow. I like all kinds of bad movies, and I dislike plenty of good ones. That's just how I roll. You roll your own way. We all do.
I mean you can critique but some reviewers seem to forget the basics making it more complicated. Some of the reviewers are just dumbasses
Here's the thing, kids don't give a shit whether its a good or bad movie
Reminded me of watching a Cars movie critic where I expect him shit talk about it hilariously like Schaff did but instead he goes on minutes long rambling about logistics and world building of CARS about how it would not work.
I have NO clue when I started watching you but now I can't stop... great work man
One of the things I like about modern kids movies is that there seems to be more that start to have a bit more in depth of a plot and more emotional meaning. A good kids movie is a movie kids can enjoy, a great kids movie is a movie anyone can enjoy.
Basically every RUclips movie critic channel in a nutshell
the ones who put the movie's rotten tomatoes critic scores on the thumbnail and only the critic scores
Especially Schaffrillas
@@matityaloran9157 that’s what I’m saying
@@95georgie And I’m agreeing
“A BAT-CREDIT CARD?!”
bro really suggested american psycho to a kid lmao
LOL
film critics and youtube film critics when a kids movie isnt a cinematic masterpiece:
*movie for all ages
@@GabrielParedesOrtiz-c4i the content in the movie is for all ages*
@@ThePharaoh9 shit you're right
When you're in film school, people like this are at literally every seminar and movie night 😑
"It's just a kids movie"
"It might be kids movie but it still deserves to be criticized if it has flaws. You guys always expect to be exempted. Remember, we are also against nitpicking."
*proceeds to post an hour long video ranting about historically inaccurate gowns and not having dark themes like death, childhood trauma, passage of time and old age as a must ingredient because lack of it means mindless crap*
But it's not they're age group of course they won't enjoy it
Bro it is made for kids
Exactly lmao and it's not like live action also doesn't explore those themes all the time.
@@justinechaine5679 animation isn’t just for kids and liveaction ain’t just for adults.
@@RayDrawzDragonz yeah, I agree with that completely
Children aren't blind to critics. So mant adults see children as just a superficial product of no reasoning, judgement or deep character, and I'm shocked one could forget, because we were kids once, right?
The problem with children is that they aren't as developed in articulating and delivering their understandings and ideas to the outside world. Children have a rich inside of ideas, fantasy, deep thoughts and complexity. Kids sees/feels quality, but they find it hard to communicate their feedback; this can be demonstrated in their long-term behavior where it becomes clearer. A bad childrens movie is a bad childrens movie; theres no excuse for it being bad: holding weak plot, conflicts, development and so on.
Children deserve to be taken seriously and be given the best of cinematics, not pushed aside and given garbage content. Here are some examples of good children movies: Shrek, The lion King, Inside Out, Spirited away, Frozen, Charlie and the chocolate factory, Narnia and lots more.
Don't disrespect quality and it's importance. Children deserve to be nurtured and raised with care. Critiquing movies are a must and not stupid if you want feedback and improvement.
Dude yeah I was a child once too. And I had no idea what was good or not. A lot of the content I loved was garbage when I looked back I think it’s pretty undeniable that kids have a different view of what’s good and not good. I used to see what my mom would watch and I’d think it was garbage and yet it was an Oscar winning movie. Sure, I enjoyed the objectively good things too, but no more than the bad ones, bc it was all good to me
@@ajakakakak In one's long-term behavior you'll notice which movies a child keep getting back to, and it shows. For me it was Shrek, The Lion King, Monster Inc, Toy story and Harry Potter movies. I watch other movies too that are concidered bad, and the interessting thing is that the bad ones for me were just as good as the ones that I mentioned, in my childish opinion. But as I said, your behavior reveals your reflected *TRUE* opinion; what movies you come back to, over time, gives away your behavior and it shows that you are sensitive to good quality, just not fully aware of it yet.
@@SealMeall what
@@ajakakakak*Time* reveals your *True* opinion, even if you are not conscious of it. A child may say he likes all movies equally, but ends up coming back to, more often, to the higher quality ones (as preferred). This is what "behavior" reveals. This is how quality is precious. We are only a product of our thoughts; so we should be mindful of what we build ourselves with.
Omg I just want to have a nice Saturday with my kid. How many small children have you taken to the theater? How many times? Seriously be honest:
Man, people just cant have fun anymore dude!
Also I love these little short skits, its like Vine or something idk, basically its just cool to me and funny
dude, they get paid to rate a movie critically, no matter what.
@dreamsz.yeah, though at the same time kids a lot of the times don’t have the same perspective of good or bad older people do. I remember a lot of movies I loved when I was little only to rewatch them when I was older and be like “damn this sucks”
now? garbage thrown to our eyes...
it sometimes hurts, and i'm now stucjk with this until th end of time
These guys have a RUclips channel with a poorly drawn mascot that they put into their thumbnails with an angry face with giant captions that just say “TRASH” or something. They also give bad reviews to anything they didn’t grow up with as a child. Either that or they just copy word for word what some other critic says about it.
For real the mostly use it for the Disney hatebase videos and they always put Mickey there
#justiceforMickeyMouse
Exactly I thought I was going insane, so many critics are just pumping out hate reviews fuelled by nostalgia bias, to them anything that they didn't grow up with is worse than dogshit
CALOBI PRODUCTIONSS XDD
@charlesbradshaw5183 These are the same people that hate Family Guy and Fanboy and ChumChum for “being too mean spirited” and “fetish fuel.” Yet, they will praise whatever they grew up with for the same things.
@Ichangemypfpeverymonth I remember this one animation review channel that claimed that Moden Family Guy is the worst thing ever made due to being "too meanspirited." Yet, he would praise South Park and Invader Zim for doing the same things as Family Guy.
As a game critic, I confirm that this is what a film critic next door be like.
Do you have a blog or are you freelance?
"that one guy thats alpha sigma... the guy whos sigma"💀
Watching a grown man rant about how "children aren't idiots" to explain why a children's show/movie that doesn't appeal to him at age 36 is bad
“A children's story that can only be enjoyed by children is not a good children's story in the slightest.”
― C.S. Lewis
Yh most of these people just want for a kids movie to cater to them
Especially those OOOOLD nostalgia critic clones, there were some GARBAGE nostalgia critic clones back in, like, 2008 or 2013.
Though oddly enough Doug Walker has been willing to grant a certain level of license to kids’ movies that he wouldn’t for other films
the super mario galaxy is giving me nostalgia
Somehow I knew it had to be from Super Mario Galaxy. No other soundtrack gives me this sense of nostalgia.
blud really criticized the criticizer 😭
this is probably the best commentary on film critics ever given, A+
I felt this for the most recent video game movies which are vast improvements to what video game movies used to be such as Detective Pickachu, Sonic, the Mario movie, and the FNaF movie. Do these films have their flaws? God yes, they do. Does that make them complete ass/the worst movies that year like some critics make them out to be? No.
Sometimes movies can just be fun. Not everything needs a deep message or be a cinematic masterpiece.
If there is one thing they should know: To not act like it is the end of the world just because someone breathed incorrectly in a movie.
Most critics I've seen actually like all those movies. I tend to just ignore the reviewers whose opinions I don't like. Because that's what it boils down to, opinion. That's why even EFAP can disagree amongst each other from time to time.
@@xFlareLeon EFAP?
The Mario Movie and FNAF Movie are heavily flawed and got the low ratings they deserve. Detective Pikachu and Sonic got high ratings and understandably so, unlike Mario and FNAF the plot isn't just hyperactive nonsense
I don't know what they said about Detective Pikachu but I remember they actually liked the (first) Sonic movie, which was a breath of fresh air for Sonic fans who had a bone to pick with gaming journalism before it was cool
I love a lot of movies from my childhood. But I also love watching people rip kid's movies to shreds, especially the genuinely bad ones. Sue me but Danny Gonzalez's jokes as he annihilated Spookly, the Square Pumpkin, will forever make me busy a gut laughing😂
*will forever make me bust a nut laughing😂
I fixed it for ya!
As a critic I do confirm we break into the theatres with a remote to control the film and scream on the top of our lungs about the movie’s minor inconsistencies
Grant ain't pregnant but he never fails to deliver.
This joke doesn’t make sense. I genuinely pray on your downfall. Normally, I’m not religious, but from here on out, every time I wake up, your downfall will be there. Every time, I eat lunch, your downfall will be mentioned. Every time, I eat supper, YOUR DOWNFALL WILL BE REMEMBERED.
@@anotherpromotor real
@@anotherpromotor imagine posting a complimentary comment and someone pops up and straight up wishes you misfortune🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
I've seen this comment like 100 times and I still don't understand it
@@anotherpromotor1. Nobody cares. 2. The joke is very understandable, I believe that you wrote this comment on purpose for no reason and to get a reaction. Is this all some joke to you?
Critics when you have to be a fan of a certain video game franchise to understand and enjoy the movie:
16% critic review
96% viewer review
The 27% FNAF score was actually accurate because the movie was a mess and it didnt deliver the suspense and dread the game did
Or, it’s just simply bad. While I enjoyed the Mario movie, the pacing was a huge issue and the film’s quality suffered because of it.
The “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie was connected to the games only by its lore. Every other ingredient that made it viral, including suspense, scares, and atmosphere, were absent. The acting was also pretty stiff.
Just about every other video game adaptation besides those two were just completely disconnected from the source material, so I’ll provide no input.
This video is funny because the film critic is overreacting at a film targeted exclusively towards toddlers.
Video game movies, while mainly aimed to children, connect with more than that demographic. And they, unfortunately, fail to be much more than cheap fan service.
I have heard that the “Fallout” show tries to do something more appropriate for its franchise, so I will have to check that one out.
@@noobmasterruben5167 I bet you think horror movies need to be rated R to be good because all you like is blood and gore
It did have suspense and dread but noooo you just want gore left and right
@@noobmasterruben5167you’re the typa guy to watch gore and brag about it to your family
@@blazejunior2293 Dude, I prefer something much richer like Coraline which has better horror and no blood it has way more suspense than that shite
The critics made me feel like Super Mario Bros Movie would be mid but I absolutely loved it when watching. That's not my fault that they have never played Mario games
Even if people never played the Mario games, they will enjoy it if they expose themselves with positive energy. My parents do not play Mario games yet they loved the movie. We had conversations about the Mario game references afterwards.
I watched it and I loved it, every reference everything, Mario games were my childhood!
Speaking off Mario, I believe he played the Mario galaxy music
The story wasn't anything mind-blowing, true, but critics are judging it for what it is and many give it a fair score. We have emotional ties to Mario because of nostalgia, so the emotional payoff is more intense for us. It's at least decent when viewed critically, and that's fine. Truly incredible movies are rare, but I donçt know anyone who can honestly say Puss In Boots: The Last Wish was objectively bad.
Love how yall are acting like a 50-60% is a bad score lol
Criticizing a piece of media made for little kids for not stimulating your adult brain enough is the weirdest trend on RUclips.
@zalybrainlessgenius503 This has been around forever. Angry Video Game Nerd, Nostalgia Critic, SuperWarioMan, etc.
Most kids movies are overestimating junk
Ok, that remote bit popped into my head when you mentioned the wand, and then you ACTUALLY DID IT! Lol 😂.
Genius bruh.
I hate when people say "it's a kids movie!!" like it can't be critiqued like any other movie. You can still critique story, morale, characters, animation etc. Don't get me wrong, I am not target audience, but there are still good kids movies and bad kids movies. Isn't it kinda... obvious? Not saying you have to nitpick every little detail, it sounds petty, but still, you want the best for your kid, you want for him to have fun and learn improtant lessons. Maybe it's better to show him Spirited Away or Toy Story and not Sausage Party (it's 6 am, come with "it's a bad kids movie" yourself)
Very true. It shows a level of disrespect towards children I feel like? Like they don’t deserve quality or something. Also there’s a lot of overlap between people who say « it’s just a kids’ movie » and people who tends to think animation = made for kids. Which… no? Art is art, some of it is made for kids and some isn’t, but there should be no hierarchy between the forms it takes.
On the other hand, what I _do_ get tired of is when people refuse to suspend their disbelief and try to critique stories that are clearly meant to be fairytales through a solely realistic lense (as depicted in this short with the critic getting upset at the use of a magic wand). To use a real life example, remember when people kept pointing out how, in « be our guest » from Beauty and the Beast, there were entirely too many dancing pieces of furniture and that the Beast couldn’t possibly have had that many servants? Like fellas… this is a metaphorical animated fairytale with big musical numbers, and the dancing furniture is part of the _decor._ Complaining about this is like saying that characters in musical spontaneously bursting into song is unrealistic because it doesn’t happen in real life. Of course it doesn’t happen in real life, it’s not like the authors are unaware of it!
Disney especially gets a lot of these criticisms, but the worst part is, they listen to it! That’s how we get those terrible live-action remakes where all the charm and magic in sucked out for the sake of « realism », because _obviously_ having your movie feature _charm_ or _colour_ or, God forbid, being ANIMATED is not mature enough and won’t please the weird realism fetishists, which are apparently our target audience now???
Ugh, sorry I got off-track lol, I’m just still very bitter about live-action Disney remakes and the general disdain for animation and anything sincere and not gritty enough. ^^’
Sausage Party is not a kids' movie. It's rated R.
@@mr.machine3328
True lol, I remember a lot of parents getting upset at its content because it was « inappropriate for kids » but like,,, if you haven’t looked at the rating that’s on you. x) Again, too many people assume that animation = made for kids…
@@viveleshistoires4874 Speaking as an elder Millennial, it kind of surprises me whenever I hear someone still say that, because when I was a kid that was WAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY worse. I guess sometimes some people still get that attitude, but overall things have come a long, long way.
@@Marbles471
Yeah I guess it’s gotten better in a way, which I’m grateful for…. ^^’ Again though, Disney’s current trend of remaking animated movies in live action and labelling them as « more mature » seems to be giving this philosophy a resurgence. x)
i was honestly about to comment something like "he used a towel to represent a little girl? that makes no sense im unsubbing" and then the end played and i felt so powerful for a second
Kids' media doesn't need to have all criticism handwaved with a "it's for kids-" that's how kids' media got to be so bad in the first place. Children aren't idiots.
They aren’t but they have a different view on what’s bad and good. Many children enjoy movies we see as bad or childish. I know I did
I bet you're one of those people who hyper-analyzes kids movies and sucks all the fun out of them. The reality is, most kids' media is actually enjoyed by children. The opinions of pretentious adults looking for "Citizen Kane" in a G-rated fairytale doesn't really matter, as long as kids are having fun.
@@ajakakakak You are misunderstanding my point, allow me to reword it: there is media that people see as bad that kids like. I'm not trying to deny that. There's some shows that I don't see the appeal in that are objectively fairly well-written- like Bluey. What I'm talking about is the overall handwave of "it's for kids" preventing any kind of criticism for any children's media, even if it's objectively bad. Look at something like, let's say, Peppa Pig. It is formulaic, samey and actively teaches that throwing a fit makes you get your way. But a lot of criticism of it as a show is thrown away because "it's a kids' show, you're looking too hard into it." Media made for kids needs to be the bare minimum of being enjoyable and a good influence on kids- it doesn't need to be on Citizen Kane levels of plot but it just needs to be something that is base-level good to watch and not actively annoying or harmful.
Children are idiots, they will like anything, it just need to be colorful or animated. We just had the luck that we are born in the time that the producers put some effort in the cartoons
@@shawerful5209 I mean not really some kids are but more often the case is children will tolerate anything it doesn't mean they'll like it. Like on cartoon network as a kid I would get super excited when adventure time came on and get annoyed whenever they would air something like teen titans go and my opinion on either of those shows hasn't really changed in adulthood. Its pretty easy as a kid to differentiate when a show has the slightest amount of effort put into it or when it doesn't
Same critics who trashed all my favorite teen movies growing up for being too sappy or corny. Like sir that’s the point
I saw a 30 minute film analysis on Sofia the First and how it had the best villain redemption arc in all of fiction
Sir it is a Disney Jr show
Rockator video on Cedric
"this kids show has pretty good writing!"
"Duuuuur it's for kids you aren't supposed to like it"
I also saw maybe the same 30 minute film analysis on Sofia the First and how it had the best villain redemption arc, by a guy called Rockotar. It was suprisingly entertaining.
So we're not allowed to talk about good writing in a kids show?
Oh yeah. I forgot. Kids shows aren't allowed to have genuinely good writing.
That's a total war crime!
lets just have kids be the ones criticising the movies aimed at them
Honestly better idea
Dont forget them saying that it being for kids is not an excuse for bad writing because the lion king is great even though that was a high budget family movie and not a direct to dvd preschool aged cartoon
And The Lion King plagiarises a japanese cartoon and is based off Hamlet
@@seafoam5245 you still believe this bs??? And yes its based on hamlet that is true but not on kimba
0:43 POV your Chinama sins when your watching a movie:
it’s always the plot twists at the end of the vid 🔥
Literally the organization of anger issues
I mean at least he gave it a chance, unlike that one Oscar movie reviewer who refused to watch Into the Spider-Verse because it's animated and "for kids" and not any real cinema or whatever the fuck.
I really think a good critic needs to just know to criticise something for what it is instead of what it isn't. This dude tried to make beef wellington out of a chicken nugget film.
That second paragraph is so real. A lot of critics don't seem to realise that just because something isn't to their taste, it's not a personal attack or inherently bad 💀
Animation ≠ for kids
Most of Don bluth Hunchback of Notre dame and Coraline show that it's not only kid friendly
@@Simbala-bq5vyMost, if not all Don Bluth films were family movies.
Why is dude wearing sunglasses in a movie theater?? 😂
this was literally me as a kid tho i got so mad at plot contrivances and made fun of stupid parts of kids movies/shows relentlessly everyone hated me for it
To be honest, i agree to some people (especially in the case of crittics) that just because it's for kids doesn't mean it should pander or dumbdown towards the audiences and be immume to any form of criticism.
The problem is however, is that some crittics took things WAY to seriously and expect every pieces of media to have this deep philosophical meaning & stuff rather than just except that not everything gonna be like that & at times people just want to have some you know, FUN.
I mean, just look at Tom & Jerry or Looney Toons, both of these show aren't nothing more but filled with Slapstick Comedy and didn't really have an overarching plot, but it nevertheless it still good.
Not everything need to be this serious, dark, deep, or complex filled with some stuff that make you thingking all night. Sometimes, we just want to have some fun, and that's basically what the BASIC or MINIMUM purpose of every movie is, TO ENTERTAINT.
This.
I love the Mario galaxy music in the background
Bro why haven’t I heard of this guy sooner, these videos are funny asf😂
The thing with most of these critics is that they just hate anything made for women, and kids, or groups that they aren't apart of.
They bitch about anything that isn't tailor made for them.
Their biggest problem is that they think "not made for me = is actively against me" and get so aggressive for no reason 💀
Literally no critic I've seen hate anything made for women or kids or any groups that they aren't apart of
@@Hmmm777you are not the main character, just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist
Bizarre comment given movie critics and journos are overwhelmingly pro-woke
Reminds me of how someone wrote gender reversed Twilight and all the dudes were like “I get it now”
This hurts on a personal level but its also so true
Really? A TOWEL?! HE PUT A TOWEL ON HIS HEAD TO PRETEND TO BE A GIRL?! HE COULDN’T THINK OF ANY BETTER WAY?!!
I love you grant you really helped me during dark times, I remember dressing dressing as Edward Robinson for school on tik tok and you liked the video!❤
And they're blinded by the fact that they call themselves critics that they cry over anything they watch and over any opinions that oppose theirs.
"how dare they make a moral of the story. can't they think of a deep-rooted storyline for redemption??"
Film Critics be like “A N O T H E R W O K E D I S A S T E R ! W A H W A H W A H !” on every movie they see nowadays.
internet mfs when someone has a different opinion than them.
@@Someone-sc2hkthe commentor or the character?
"Go woke, go broke"
And that same movie makes over a billion dollars.
@@giantpinkcat I think the most confusing thing is that a lot of "woke" media isn't even woke 💀
Ask them what "woke" means, they will not reply or they will complicate the meaning of the word 😂
Siskel and Ebert liked a ton of movies for kids. They both had Beauty and the Beast in their Top 10 for 1991.
Gene Siskel also had The Little Mermaid, Toy Story, and Antz in their respective years.
Roger Ebert included movies like Spirited Away and Finding Nemo in his Top 10 lists.
Roger even gave Barney's Great Adventure 3/4 stars.
And I'm sure there's kids' movies they thought were trash, but I'm guessing you don't wanna mention those.
@@xFlareLeon Oh, of course there were.* But that's not my point. Even though Siskel and Ebert were adults, there were still animated movies that they loved.
*Roger Ebert's disliked kid movies- sample:
1. North (0 stars)
2. The Jungle Book 2. (1.5/4 stars)
3. Spy Kids 3. (2.5/4 stars.)
4. Hook. (2/4 stars)
5. Flubber. (1/4 stars.)
6. Home Alone. (2.5/4 stars.)
7. Home Alone 2. (2/4 stars.)
8. Thomas and the Magic Railroad. (1/4 stars.)
9. Home on the Range. (2.5/4 stars.)
10. The Princess Diaries. (1.5/4 stars.)
“It’s just a kids movie “ is still the lamest, laziest defense of trash that’s used way too often for content that’s clearly all ages.
But yeah, some things are definitely made specifically for kids
Another good example of this is adaptations of video games, like Five Nights at Freddy’s, Sonic the Hedgehog, etc.
Tbf a lot of video game movies had a reputation for being bad prior to the 2020s (like the super Mario bros movie, the 1990s one not the more recent one)
Bit of a Hot Take but just because it's a Video Game movie doesn't mean it has an excuse to have a bad story, especially depending on the game.
I expect a simple and dumb plot for a Mario Movie. I do not expect the same for a FNAF movie. Their plot and lore construction is completely different from each other.
@@giantpinkcatthey had to prioritize between being close at all to the original games and community, and having a movie critics would have approved of. I personally believe the FNAF movie made the right choice by prioritizing their fanbase, the people who actually wanted to see it, instead of strangers to the fanbase.
Could it have been better? Yeah. But it could have been a whole lot worse! Lol
@@bananabro1010 there's a huge gap between having the tagert audience in mind while making a movie and making a bad movie held together by it being part of a beloved franchise
@@randombadchannel8700 It was still a good time :)
Schafrillas analyzing Cars 2:
I love watching his videos, but honestly, that's a fair statement.
True.
don’t worry greg heffley, i thought the remote was original!
The Mario movie in a nutshell:
I was just thinking that
Critics when they see Princess Peach is not a peach fruit.
If a kids Movie can only be enjoyed by kids it's not a good kids movie. The Mario movie has many obvious flaws
@@ProbablySoon-pv6ee It’s called a kids movie for a reason. If it can also be enjoyed by adults it is called a family movie.
@tuckergDaPizza it's labeled as a family movie so maybe it shouldn't have been a hyperactive sugar rush that's exclusively for kids
These same critics "review" TV shows and just instantly decide they're good or bad when only the first episode drops
hate hate hate hate hate
Same as video game journalists reviewing games before they even finish. Imagine trying to rate any Soulsborne game after just an hour of playtime because you have articles to write.
Most critics react to the rest of the show because the horrible writing is good cringe content.
Critics when it comes to Transformers
"your more beautiful than the current one" i burst out laughing
CinemaSins be like:
This, for some reason, reminded me about how the Rotten Tomatoes critics said that the first Pokémon movie, the one with Mewtwo and Mew, was trash and money-hungry garbage because it didn't follow the game's plot.
I reaaaally hate these critics sometimes...
Kids movies should be good too. Adults are typically dragged into watching them too and it wouldnt kill for the directors to put in a bit of effort
The point is that you shouldn’t critique garbage kids love in front of them and put them down for it. You can critique kids media all you want as long as you’re not bullying literal children as an adult
I’ve been late to many Grant Wisler videos. BUT, I’M FINALLY HERE!!!!! Awesome video Grant 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Legit every film major freshman. Quinton Taratino, Martin Scorsese, Christopher Nolan, and so on being "The best Director"... Oh and many many references to Citizen Kane
My brother was literally analyzing and criticizing a show my sister watches called strawberry shortcake 😐
The one from ages ago?
@@cara-seyun yes
10 year old: oh this sonic game is so awesome. It's amazing!
22 year old Sonic Fan: His quills are too short, also his eye texture is only 1080p instead of 4K, also WHY IS HIS MOUTH ON THE FRONT INSTEAD OF THE SIDE????
I still think that all content made for children should be good quality. SpongeBob is a far better piece of content for children to be watching than shit like Cocomelon. But kids nowadays are only being given shitty content like Cocomelon.
Hell if I ever have kids, I’m raising them with the original Dora or Blue’s Clues, something that ACTUALLY benefits them in the long run and not some brain rot shit like cocomelon.
tbf cocoemlon and spongebob is for different age groups, cocomenon is made for infants and spongebob for young kids, i have multiple younger cousins and most of them stopped watching cocomelon at like age 4 and shifted to stuff like peppa pig and paw patrol
I have a ton more respect for you than ever before, Grant. Thank you 💖
“You know that one guy that’s really sigma”
💀
Ben Shapiro watching the Barbie movie
Two of his colleagues at the Daily Wire openly loved the Barbie movie (Michael Knowles and Brett Cooper) and Cooper full-blown debated Shapiro about it.
@@matityaloran9157 LMAO 😭😭
@@moonkitty_x It’s true
He's not a movie critics he's just a discord mod
I felt my soul leave my body the second he mis-used the term "cinematography."
These are the type of dudes who claim a Disney film is garbage because it's too cliche, but then writes a C- writing assignment about a depressed man who learns to find himself after seeing various sex workers.
Or they praise movies by wildly misinterpreting the point 💀
0:39 this song that appears for a split second is from Mario Galaxy and is the theme of when you unlock a star in a galaxy
Funny movie that's so funny and iconic that every joke is remembered for generations: exist
The Academy: I'll pretend I didn't watch that and give the Oscar to a movie whose main actor had to lose 30 pounds for his role, even if it's bad
Oscar bait movies are basically just using the "person with the saddest backstory wins the talent show" strategy on an industry-wide scale 💀
Wow he really put a bit of us reviewing his video? 1 star
(JK i love your vids keep up the great work)
And then they say something like "a good film is suitable for all audiences." ok but this is FOR KIDS
My personal favourite is when people flipflop between "keep politics out of children's media!" and "it's appalling how the King of Fairyland is portrayed as a kind leader when he would CLEARLY be a colonizer irl, also it's unrealistic for minorities to exist in a medieval town"
@@error-try-again-later EXACTLY
"A children's story that can only be enjoyed by children is not a good children's story at all." - C.S. Lewis
@@xFlareLeonWomp womp
Critics when the Super Mario Bros. movie isn't the next Citizen Kane: 😨🤯🤬
It doesnt have to be amazing it just needs to be half decent
I like how the children’s movie is just someone who is delusional or on drugs
Learned a long time ago never to listen to critics. Make up your own mind. Watch trailers to get a feel for it or just take a chance. Sometimes you'll get burned, other times you will be pleasantly surprised and other times still, it will be exactly what you expected for better or worse. Point being: decide for yourself whether you like it by taking the experience. No one else, no matter how educated on the subject, has a right to tell you if you should enjoy something or not.
You know what you like and you can make the best guess on whether or not something will be for you or not. A critic has to speak for the wider audience as a whole. That doesn't mean shit to an individual, though.
Especially applicable to the wannabe critics of Film Twitter.
With all fairness,kids deserve better
*insert something about the mario movie here*
That movie sucked
Bro sneak dissing CinemaSins
They be looking too deep into everything.
Film critics in Despicable Me 4
*exactly dude.* they’re calling it a boring, mid-cashgrab plus a video on how to make a cashgrab and villain. Ok, but I wouldn't call it bad.
Whenever we watch something, we come back to it only see reviewers trash talk about it. So many opinions these days
AN END CARD? THAT'S THE BEST WAY YOU COULD END THE VIDEO???
This is as great as Brock Baker's videos mocking the critics of the Sonic and Mario movies
"that one guy who is sigma and alpha" and the "and he sigma and-" got me rolling 😂😂😂