I’ve never heard this lady speak before but like everyone at Sex Matters she is articulate, knowledgeable and compassionate. I truly believe that these fantastic women at Sex Matters will be the the reason we will eventually win this fight.
Such a WONDERFUL day! I fully expected this to have happened within days or weeks of the Cass Review being released to the public, but when that didn't happen and the weeks then months ticked by, I was starting to worry that it would all be fobbed off until a return of a Conservative government. So, wow, this is fantastic. Congratulations and thank you to EVERYONE who has fought and educated and lobbied for this for years.
There's an American reality show "I am Jazz" about a boy who has been through all of this and gone through surgery as well. He's honest that he cannot experience orgasm, or even sexual arousal. He expressed dismay that boys aren't attracted to him and now seems deeply depressed. His parents should be ashamed of themselves and we can only grieve for that poor mutilated boy. I wonder if he'd have grown up as a happy gay man. Bloody tragic.
I'm 100% sure he would have. How this twisted ideology -- that destroys women's sports and spaces and allows parents to destroy the bodies and sexualities of their gay and lesbian children -- became progressive escapes me. This is the most woman-hating and homophobic ideology I've ever seen in my life.
The most heartbreaking and devastating story. Yet we have “I am Jazz” the book suggested by our state education system for primary children to read and discuss in classrooms (New Zealand )
From the moment the interim Cass review was published this was inevitable. But it's also politically necessary. Giving PBs to children can lead to lifelong medical treatments, hugely expensive surgery and possible negligence claims. But the NHS is in a hole that Streeting and Labour need to get it out of. Its funds need to go to services for actual illnesses, not to funding artificial "identities".
Next we need a REAL BAN on puberty blockers ( unlike this partial limitation which really only requires enrolment in a trial, which the new clinic system makes a default for children branded gender dysphoric ).
Well done to all the ladies at Sex Matters. They have true compassion, willing to take the mindless abuse from activists to save the nations children from this horror. A big thank you to all who put up the good fight.
@@rosemarynew2173 I did expect it. Streeting was on this trajectory well before the election, and his response to the Cass report was so definite that it had obviously been cleared with Starmer and the then Shadow Cabinet. They do not want children's ruined lives on their hands. Nor the medical bill for those ruined lives.
Keep fighting. The real battle against puberty blockers/ child sterilization is not yet won. This supposed ban actually just requires enrolment in a supposed " clinical trial " ( and the new clinic system makes enrolment in such a trial a default option ). Please don't stop speaking up.
Yes, and please understand that this supposed ban is a bit of a sham. The real battle against puberty blockers/ child sterilization is not yet won. This supposed ban actually just requires enrolment in a supposed " clinical trial " ( and the new clinic system makes enrolment in such a trial a default option ). Please don't stop fighting until these experiments are fully banned !
@mikalina1 Please don't be misled into thinking this is a real ban. The so called ban actually only places a simple condition on puberty blocker use - which is enrolment in a so called clinical trial . That so called trial is a default option for children enrolled in the new expanded clinic system that replaced GIDS - meaning that there is effectively no restriction on that new clinic system using these interventions , even on the youngest children.
Thank you for supporting the fight against puberty blockers, but please don't be misled into thinking this is a real ban. The so called ban actually only places one simple condition on puberty blocker use - which is enrolment in a so called clinical trial . That so called trial is a default option for children enrolled in the new expanded clinic system that replaced GIDS - meaning that there is effectively no restriction on that new clinic system using these interventions , even on the youngest children.
This so called ban isn't really a ban . It just requires that the children subject to these interventions be enrolled in a clinical trial. And Dr Cass recommended that all the children seen at the new expanded clinic system have the option of enrolling in a trial. Ordinary people still need to speak up , because the experts that are allowed to have power are usually the ones who are happy to mislead the public as to their intentions. @@ronachadwick7908
Keep fighting. The real battle against puberty blockers/ child sterilization is not yet won. This supposed ban actually just requires enrolment in a supposed " clinical trial " ( and the new clinic system makes enrolment in such a trial a default option ). Please don't stop fighting.
@lamington8195 it's also just as important to know that this isn't a real ban on puberty blockers. It just makes enrolment in a trial a tick box pre-requisite . And of course the Cass report recommend enrolment in a trial as a default for all children in the new expanded system that replaces GIDS.
@rodkipping it's about time for a genuine ban , which unfortunately this isn't . This only requires that all children having these interventions be enrolled in a ( supposed ) clinical trial . And the new clinic system that replaced GIDS offers enrolment in such a " trial " as a default for all children they receive as gender identity or dysphoria related referrals. This fake ban mostly just acts to calm public outrage , and to launder the continued and expanded use of these interventions by the network of clinics that are intended to continue and expand the work of GIDS . Please keep questioning , and keep fighting. Don't accept false reassurances.
@stephenjarvis8420 a real ban would be great news, bit there a isn't actually a ban. Did you mean as the bit about the exception for " clinical trials "? And of course almost everyone missed the bit in the Cass report where enrolment in a large trial is a default for children referred to the new clinic system !?
@stellafalconer6715 I wish you were correct. Unfortunately this s so called ban is a sham, and a false reassurance designed to quell public concern, while allowing continuing experimentation on children. The so called ban actually only put a condition on use , which is enrolling the children into a trial - and the new network of clinics will do that by default ( as actually outlined in the Class report ). This is a trick, a slight of hand , to launder continued use of these interventions by the expanded clinic system that replaces GIDS. If you doubt me, listen to this clip again, and hear the " clinical trials " exemption , and look up references to the same in the Cass report. The real battle is yet to be won. And propaganda suggesting the war is won risks everyone leaving the battle early. Please question everything , and read and listen closely.
You can’t justify puberty blockers except where there is a serious medical need - which gender nonconformity and confusion are not - because children can’t consent, end of story.
But that argues against itself...there is huge money in these operations. I imagine that you let the same mutilators-driving-BMWs decide if there is a serious medical need. This is Hillary Clinton logic....NO solution is perfect, so you pick the best.
Very true @LavenderBlume . Which is why you need to know that this supposed ban doesn't actually ban puberty blocker use on children. It just requires that those children be enrolled in a token mass " clinical trial " . Did you notice that the Cass review recommend that all children seen in the new expanded clinic system ( that replaced GIDS ) all have the option to be enrolled in a mass trial?
Is this a ban in private health care too? Originally it was only the NHS and were still going to be given to boys. It was also only a ban on under 16 year olds. I hope this really is a complete ban. My concern is that they said "outside of clinical trials". Clinical trials on children for a made up mental illness is still very wrong.
@Gwion-x8w better to put energy into exposing this fake " ban ' , and achieving a real ban on puberty blockers. This supposed ban is actually just a requirement that all children receiving these dubious interventions be enrolled in a " clinical trial". Pair that with an understanding that Cass recommended enrolment in a trial as a default option for all children in the new system, and you might need to save the celebrations for later. In fact of you are interested in legal ramifications, you might consider how this so called ban ( a requirement to sign a clinical trial enrolment , not a real ban ) might be understood more cynically as a plan for liability limitation, limiting future court cases by requiring children to be signed up for a trial. Have a really good think about the ramifications of that.
Except in clinical trials.. I hope there are some extremely well regulated parameters around what constitutes a clinical trial. Given the performance of GIDS and their shocking lack or record keeping for this horrible experimental treatments they performed on thousands of children before being shut down.
While it's good news, call me cynical but there's still an opportunity to experiment on children under the guise of a 'trial'. Which people might police this? The same biased people that handed out off licence drugs to minors and didn't keep any records??
@colleenlloyd9842 if this was actually a real ban on blockers I'd agree. It's actually not a ban at all - it's a requirement for children being subjected to these interventions to be signed up to a clinical trial ( and Cass has already directed the new expanded clinics towards a mass default trial ). This is effectively a liability limitation paired with clever propaganda to reassure the public while not actually protecting children . And re Australia, a couple of our pro-child-transition " health " propagandists have openly stated how they think the UK is actually moving more towards the Australian systems ( which I agree with you are horrific ) . They aren't completely wrong about what the new clinic system and the. Cass review really do. It's a masterwork of propaganda and false reassurances , while actually radically expanding the system which abuses children (via developmental disruption), and very cynically reframing the liability limitation "trial " requirement as a " ban ".
Gosh you guys are creepy. Worrying about other people's children's private parts. Clearly you don't think children should have rights to medical privacy because of bigoted views. Clearly most light switches are configured normally... But some aren't.
@Vibez@Vibez-o5k No , not actually a win. It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization.
@cdo...49283 A real ban would be amazing news. It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization.
Ask yourself what must be wrong that you have to go to the highest levels of society to decide what can be done to your child. Even though the decision is right, this route is horrible.
@sarahainscough6264 a real ban would be great news - but sadly that's not what this is ! It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization.
@twivey42 wouldn't you rather we had a REAL ban on puberty blockers ?? All this phoney " ban " does is require all the children often being given these interventions to be enrolled in a mass trial ( which the Cass report wants all children in the new system to have as a default option ). And advertising this false ban as if it were a real ban makes people stop fighting when they need to speak out more than ever.
A real ban of puberty blockers would be great news- but It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization. This theatre is an outrageous con, designed to continue experimentation on children while limiting liability , and neutering dissent . Listen carefully, read the review , and fight against the sterilization of children.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
WHAT??????? This is amazing news in a deluge of depressing news stories. Amazing!!!!!!!
I’ve never heard this lady speak before but like everyone at Sex Matters she is articulate, knowledgeable and compassionate. I truly believe that these fantastic women at Sex Matters will be the the reason we will eventually win this fight.
You sound like a nutcase, Patrick
Fantastic news! My only wish is that lives were never destroyed by this horrific cult behaviour in the first place.
Such a WONDERFUL day! I fully expected this to have happened within days or weeks of the Cass Review being released to the public, but when that didn't happen and the weeks then months ticked by, I was starting to worry that it would all be fobbed off until a return of a Conservative government. So, wow, this is fantastic. Congratulations and thank you to EVERYONE who has fought and educated and lobbied for this for years.
There's an American reality show "I am Jazz" about a boy who has been through all of this and gone through surgery as well. He's honest that he cannot experience orgasm, or even sexual arousal. He expressed dismay that boys aren't attracted to him and now seems deeply depressed. His parents should be ashamed of themselves and we can only grieve for that poor mutilated boy. I wonder if he'd have grown up as a happy gay man. Bloody tragic.
I'm 100% sure he would have. How this twisted ideology -- that destroys women's sports and spaces and allows parents to destroy the bodies and sexualities of their gay and lesbian children -- became progressive escapes me. This is the most woman-hating and homophobic ideology I've ever seen in my life.
The most heartbreaking and devastating story. Yet we have “I am Jazz” the book suggested by our state education system for primary children to read and discuss in classrooms (New Zealand )
From the moment the interim Cass review was published this was inevitable. But it's also politically necessary. Giving PBs to children can lead to lifelong medical treatments, hugely expensive surgery and possible negligence claims. But the NHS is in a hole that Streeting and Labour need to get it out of. Its funds need to go to services for actual illnesses, not to funding artificial "identities".
Next we need a REAL BAN on puberty blockers ( unlike this partial limitation which really only requires enrolment in a trial, which the new clinic system makes a default for children branded gender dysphoric ).
Well done to all the ladies at Sex Matters. They have true compassion, willing to take the mindless abuse from activists to save the nations children from this horror. A big thank you to all who put up the good fight.
I’m staggered.
I absolutely never expected this.
This is wonderful news. Well done for all who fought for this.
@@rosemarynew2173 I did expect it. Streeting was on this trajectory well before the election, and his response to the Cass report was so definite that it had obviously been cleared with Starmer and the then Shadow Cabinet. They do not want children's ruined lives on their hands. Nor the medical bill for those ruined lives.
Finally! Great news.
Hallelujah! Step in the right direction. Can not believe humanity let it get this far.
Keep fighting. The real battle against puberty blockers/ child sterilization is not yet won. This supposed ban actually just requires enrolment in a supposed " clinical trial " ( and the new clinic system makes enrolment in such a trial a default option ). Please don't stop speaking up.
Brilliant, now throw Susie Green in jail
Yes. Shame on her.
@@ronachadwick7908yup, it should always have been illegal
Yes, and please understand that this supposed ban is a bit of a sham. The real battle against puberty blockers/ child sterilization is not yet won. This supposed ban actually just requires enrolment in a supposed " clinical trial " ( and the new clinic system makes enrolment in such a trial a default option ). Please don't stop fighting until these experiments are fully banned !
Extraordinary. Well done Wes Streeting!
Well done❤
Great news, great work! Thank you
@mikalina1 Please don't be misled into thinking this is a real ban. The so called ban actually only places a simple condition on puberty blocker use - which is enrolment in a so called clinical trial . That so called trial is a default option for children enrolled in the new expanded clinic system that replaced GIDS - meaning that there is effectively no restriction on that new clinic system using these interventions , even on the youngest children.
Sense
Mrs told me this today, couldn't be happier hearing this!!
Thank you for supporting the fight against puberty blockers, but please don't be misled into thinking this is a real ban. The so called ban actually only places one simple condition on puberty blocker use - which is enrolment in a so called clinical trial . That so called trial is a default option for children enrolled in the new expanded clinic system that replaced GIDS - meaning that there is effectively no restriction on that new clinic system using these interventions , even on the youngest children.
YES!!!!
Who hired these 'experts'? I could have told them about the harm for free.
But nobody listens to us non experts. We needed Dr Cass to shine a light on the lies.
This so called ban isn't really a ban . It just requires that the children subject to these interventions be enrolled in a clinical trial. And Dr Cass recommended that all the children seen at the new expanded clinic system have the option of enrolling in a trial. Ordinary people still need to speak up , because the experts that are allowed to have power are usually the ones who are happy to mislead the public as to their intentions. @@ronachadwick7908
Good!
Keep fighting. The real battle against puberty blockers/ child sterilization is not yet won. This supposed ban actually just requires enrolment in a supposed " clinical trial " ( and the new clinic system makes enrolment in such a trial a default option ). Please don't stop fighting.
yes!!!
Excellent news! 😀
While this is great news, I think the fundamental issue to remember is: You quite simply CANNOT change your sex.
@lamington8195 it's also just as important to know that this isn't a real ban on puberty blockers. It just makes enrolment in a trial a tick box pre-requisite . And of course the Cass report recommend enrolment in a trial as a default for all children in the new expanded system that replaces GIDS.
About time!!
@rodkipping it's about time for a genuine ban , which unfortunately this isn't . This only requires that all children having these interventions be enrolled in a ( supposed ) clinical trial . And the new clinic system that replaced GIDS offers enrolment in such a " trial " as a default for all children they receive as gender identity or dysphoria related referrals. This fake ban mostly just acts to calm public outrage , and to launder the continued and expanded use of these interventions by the network of clinics that are intended to continue and expand the work of GIDS . Please keep questioning , and keep fighting. Don't accept false reassurances.
Good news
Great news
@stephenjarvis8420 a real ban would be great news, bit there a isn't actually a ban. Did you mean as the bit about the exception for " clinical trials "? And of course almost everyone missed the bit in the Cass report where enrolment in a large trial is a default for children referred to the new clinic system !?
At long last. This is extremely good news.
@stellafalconer6715 I wish you were correct. Unfortunately this s so called ban is a sham, and a false reassurance designed to quell public concern, while allowing continuing experimentation on children. The so called ban actually only put a condition on use , which is enrolling the children into a trial - and the new network of clinics will do that by default ( as actually outlined in the Class report ). This is a trick, a slight of hand , to launder continued use of these interventions by the expanded clinic system that replaces GIDS.
If you doubt me, listen to this clip again, and hear the " clinical trials " exemption , and look up references to the same in the Cass report. The real battle is yet to be won. And propaganda suggesting the war is won risks everyone leaving the battle early. Please question everything , and read and listen closely.
You can’t justify puberty blockers except where there is a serious medical need - which gender nonconformity and confusion are not - because children can’t consent, end of story.
But that argues against itself...there is huge money in these operations. I imagine that you let the same mutilators-driving-BMWs decide if there is a serious medical need.
This is Hillary Clinton logic....NO solution is perfect, so you pick the best.
Very true @LavenderBlume . Which is why you need to know that this supposed ban doesn't actually ban puberty blocker use on children. It just requires that those children be enrolled in a token mass " clinical trial " . Did you notice that the Cass review recommend that all children seen in the new expanded clinic system ( that replaced GIDS ) all have the option to be enrolled in a mass trial?
@@georginawhitby1320Yes, I am dismayed to hear of the loophole for clinical trials.
You do realize the side effects of puberty-blockers are reversible right?
Brilliant
Excellent, hopeful news
This is fantastic news!!!!!!!!
Rdisagree, HARM is possible, chronic pain, h attacks by age 30 etc- NOT just to those who regret. No to elective dis memberment. Nope. ❤️
Is this a ban in private health care too? Originally it was only the NHS and were still going to be given to boys. It was also only a ban on under 16 year olds. I hope this really is a complete ban.
My concern is that they said "outside of clinical trials". Clinical trials on children for a made up mental illness is still very wrong.
A clinical trial would have to pass an ethical committee and it seems highly unlikely that this would be possible.
@sophiejameson428 I hope that's true. There's been so much unethical behaviour and word play with the ideology though that it's concerning.
Hurray! Stop the child abuse - emotional, psychological and development - by those entrusted with the power to care for them.
I could listen to Naomi Cunningham read the telephone book out loud.
Let the lawsuits begin.
@Gwion-x8w better to put energy into exposing this fake " ban ' , and achieving a real ban on puberty blockers. This supposed ban is actually just a requirement that all children receiving these dubious interventions be enrolled in a " clinical trial". Pair that with an understanding that Cass recommended enrolment in a trial as a default option for all children in the new system, and you might need to save the celebrations for later. In fact of you are interested in legal ramifications, you might consider how this so called ban ( a requirement to sign a clinical trial enrolment , not a real ban ) might be understood more cynically as a plan for liability limitation, limiting future court cases by requiring children to be signed up for a trial. Have a really good think about the ramifications of that.
Bloody brilliant
Fabulous news.
Except in clinical trials.. I hope there are some extremely well regulated parameters around what constitutes a clinical trial. Given the performance of GIDS and their shocking lack or record keeping for this horrible experimental treatments they performed on thousands of children before being shut down.
Sad it's gone this long
Great Swedish documentary called the trans train, its so sad
Sweden knew this years ago
Holy sh*t
While it's good news, call me cynical but there's still an opportunity to experiment on children under the guise of a 'trial'. Which people might police this? The same biased people that handed out off licence drugs to minors and didn't keep any records??
Agree. NO experiments on children is justified.
💯
They’d have to get approval for a trial, and thankfully that seems unlikely to happen.
Good.
The worst side effect of puberty blockers is the blue hair it creates in the patient. Jk.
I hope Australia is watching!
@colleenlloyd9842 if this was actually a real ban on blockers I'd agree. It's actually not a ban at all - it's a requirement for children being subjected to these interventions to be signed up to a clinical trial ( and Cass has already directed the new expanded clinics towards a mass default trial ). This is effectively a liability limitation paired with clever propaganda to reassure the public while not actually protecting children .
And re Australia, a couple of our pro-child-transition " health " propagandists have openly stated how they think the UK is actually moving more towards the Australian systems ( which I agree with you are horrific ) . They aren't completely wrong about what the new clinic system and the. Cass review really do. It's a masterwork of propaganda and false reassurances , while actually radically expanding the system which abuses children (via developmental disruption), and very cynically reframing the liability limitation "trial " requirement as a " ban ".
Gosh you guys are creepy. Worrying about other people's children's private parts. Clearly you don't think children should have rights to medical privacy because of bigoted views. Clearly most light switches are configured normally... But some aren't.
Outside trials, we need better
A WIN!!! ❤🎉
@Vibez@Vibez-o5k No , not actually a win. It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization.
Amazing news ❤
@cdo...49283 A real ban would be amazing news. It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization.
@georginawhitby1320 Damn.. I knew I shouldn't trust Labour to do anything good..
Ask yourself what must be wrong that you have to go to the highest levels of society to decide what can be done to your child.
Even though the decision is right, this route is horrible.
What? There’s lots of laws about what you can and can’t do to your children.
They've just creating a black market for what they banned
How is this different than a ban on child abuse?
At last, common sense is back in the room. Hope it stays!
Good news🎉🎉🎉🎉
@sarahainscough6264 a real ban would be great news - but sadly that's not what this is ! It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization.
About Time. Good work
@twivey42 wouldn't you rather we had a REAL ban on puberty blockers ?? All this phoney " ban " does is require all the children often being given these interventions to be enrolled in a mass trial ( which the Cass report wants all children in the new system to have as a default option ). And advertising this false ban as if it were a real ban makes people stop fighting when they need to speak out more than ever.
❤️🇬🇧❌❌
👁👁
Fantastic! Are people waking up to the abuse!
Great news
A real ban of puberty blockers would be great news- but It's not a ban at all. It just a requirement that children be enrolled in a clinical trial to receive the interventions, and of course Cass recommended to make that trial available to all children in the expanded new clinic system. It's not a ban , it's just a sign off that limits legal liability of the perpetrators. And that's paired with false reassurances to calm a public justifiably outraged about child sterilization. This theatre is an outrageous con, designed to continue experimentation on children while limiting liability , and neutering dissent . Listen carefully, read the review , and fight against the sterilization of children.
@georginawhitby1320 are there any trials going on?
How can you do an ethical trail?