Next up, low IQ Hollywood 'goes woke, goes broke' with Bond. What they don't understand is that James Bond is supposed to be debonair, a rough diamond, somewhat brazen, an adventurer and, yes, an expert seducer. Since some Hollywood types only have a vocabulary of about 4 adjectives, it is hardly surprising that Bond has recently been labelled 'sexist' 'not current' etc, but let me explain why this is predictable drivel 1) It is merely a fact that some spies, past and present, male and female were adventurers, had to be brazen and were expert seducers. This was in order to gain information, set honeytraps and so on. 2)There is nothing triggering about a man being a rogue loner with wry wit. There is nothing inherently sexist about a man seducing a woman, or multiple women in the context of the story or generally, depending on context. We live in an era where women quite casually gloat about having 10 boyfriends who believe they are wild ass kickers. Should there be a show where women go around conquering in some manner, for example? There already have been many shows of such nature. Context is everything. 3) If Bond is just a guy who goes around punching people then talking about War and Peace with his granny, or nattering about some political issue which no woke person understands (all lazy, woke people should stay away from politics since their brains can only process 5 percent of any issue and make up their gibberish based on that) or having a cup of hot milk before bed we are in a different film all together. That film might be good, or it might be horrible. It might look like a crude and lacklustre version of Jason Bourne. Most people who support a woke Bond wouldn't understand an intellectual film either. Why not keep tastes separate so you can appreciate each one? 4) Audiences are smart enough to know what fiction is. No human can fend off 200 henchmen weilding machine guns with an ankle pistol, anyway. They can certainly build themselves to be formidable warriors, but they can't do that. Therefore, you might as well accept that these are archetypes. They have some basis in reality but take the audience into a sense of extraordinary. 5) Not everyone lives a boring life. Yes most woke people live with their moms till 50. However there, amazingly enough, really still exists people who know that having 50 genders will not make you interesting, impressive, worldly nor will it give you stories to tell your grandkids. Some people really do travel the world, drink exotic drinks, meet many unique people and, yes, do many more of the things Bond does. There are even people who have a 'settled' life, who still exist within a paridigm of adventure and actually achieve things. So there we have it. Although you will not want to hear this final, slightly conspiritoral point. There will always be someone who benefits from humans being bland, dull, weak and dumb. You may think it can't be so, but history proves otherwise. By following the woke hollyweird films and giving them your money, you support this dilution of culture into something akin to dishwater mixed in with days old sink froth. Luckily most people don't watch woke Hollyweird films and seek out the good ones. Just requires these barely conscious film producers to figure this out.
Barbara is such a cutie.... love her energy...Carey is so underrated and awesome with the camera. Rami is a true actor and brings raw emotions on screen.. great conversation here
Next up, low IQ Hollywood 'goes woke, goes broke' with Bond. What they don't understand is that James Bond is supposed to be debonair, a rough diamond, somewhat brazen, an adventurer and, yes, an expert seducer. Since some Hollywood types only have a vocabulary of about 4 adjectives, it is hardly surprising that Bond has recently been labelled 'sexist' 'not current' etc, but let me explain why this is predictable drivel 1) It is merely a fact that some spies, past and present, male and female were adventurers, had to be brazen and were expert seducers. This was in order to gain information, set honeytraps and so on. 2)There is nothing triggering about a man being a rogue loner with wry wit. There is nothing inherently sexist about a man seducing a woman, or multiple women in the context of the story or generally, depending on context. We live in an era where women quite casually gloat about having 10 boyfriends who believe they are wild ass kickers. Should there be a show where women go around conquering in some manner, for example? There already have been many shows of such nature. Context is everything. 3) If Bond is just a guy who goes around punching people then talking about War and Peace with his granny, or nattering about some political issue which no woke person understands (all lazy, woke people should stay away from politics since their brains can only process 5 percent of any issue and make up their gibberish based on that) or having a cup of hot milk before bed we are in a different film all together. That film might be good, or it might be horrible. It might look like a crude and lacklustre version of Jason Bourne. Most people who support a woke Bond wouldn't understand an intellectual film either. Why not keep tastes separate so you can appreciate each one? 4) Audiences are smart enough to know what fiction is. No human can fend off 200 henchmen weilding machine guns with an ankle pistol, anyway. They can certainly build themselves to be formidable warriors, but they can't do that. Therefore, you might as well accept that these are archetypes. They have some basis in reality but take the audience into a sense of extraordinary. 5) Not everyone lives a boring life. Yes most woke people live with their moms till 50. However there, amazingly enough, really still exists people who know that having 50 genders will not make you interesting, impressive, worldly nor will it give you stories to tell your grandkids. Some people really do travel the world, drink exotic drinks, meet many unique people and, yes, do many more of the things Bond does. There are even people who have a 'settled' life, who still exist within a paridigm of adventure and actually achieve things. So there we have it. Although you will not want to hear this final, slightly conspiritoral point. There will always be someone who benefits from humans being bland, dull, weak and dumb. You may think it can't be so, but history proves otherwise. By following the woke hollyweird films and giving them your money, you support this dilution of culture into something akin to dishwater mixed in with days old sink froth. Luckily most people don't watch woke Hollyweird films and seek out the good ones. Just requires these barely conscious film producers to figure this out.
That, my friend, is the magic of Roger Deakins at work. He also did the cinematography for 1984, Shawshank Redemption, Fargo, The Big Lebowski, A Beautiful Mind, Oh Brother Where Art Thou, No Country For Old Men, The Assassination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford, True Grit, Rango, Blade Runner 2049, and 1917. I honestly don't think there's a person in Hollywood better at making a scene look beautiful than him.
Next up, low IQ Hollywood 'goes woke, goes broke' with Bond. What they don't understand is that James Bond is supposed to be debonair, a rough diamond, somewhat brazen, an adventurer and, yes, an expert seducer. Since some Hollywood types only have a vocabulary of about 4 adjectives, it is hardly surprising that Bond has recently been labelled 'sexist' 'not current' etc, but let me explain why this is predictable drivel 1) It is merely a fact that some spies, past and present, male and female were adventurers, had to be brazen and were expert seducers. This was in order to gain information, set honeytraps and so on. 2)There is nothing triggering about a man being a rogue loner with wry wit. There is nothing inherently sexist about a man seducing a woman, or multiple women in the context of the story or generally, depending on context. We live in an era where women quite casually gloat about having 10 boyfriends who believe they are wild ass kickers. Should there be a show where women go around conquering in some manner, for example? There already have been many shows of such nature. Context is everything. 3) If Bond is just a guy who goes around punching people then talking about War and Peace with his granny, or nattering about some political issue which no woke person understands (all lazy, woke people should stay away from politics since their brains can only process 5 percent of any issue and make up their gibberish based on that) or having a cup of hot milk before bed we are in a different film all together. That film might be good, or it might be horrible. It might look like a crude and lacklustre version of Jason Bourne. Most people who support a woke Bond wouldn't understand an intellectual film either. Why not keep tastes separate so you can appreciate each one? 4) Audiences are smart enough to know what fiction is. No human can fend off 200 henchmen weilding machine guns with an ankle pistol, anyway. They can certainly build themselves to be formidable warriors, but they can't do that. Therefore, you might as well accept that these are archetypes. They have some basis in reality but take the audience into a sense of extraordinary. 5) Not everyone lives a boring life. Yes most woke people live with their moms till 50. However there, amazingly enough, really still exists people who know that having 50 genders will not make you interesting, impressive, worldly nor will it give you stories to tell your grandkids. Some people really do travel the world, drink exotic drinks, meet many unique people and, yes, do many more of the things Bond does. There are even people who have a 'settled' life, who still exist within a paridigm of adventure and actually achieve things. So there we have it. Although you will not want to hear this final, slightly conspiritoral point. There will always be someone who benefits from humans being bland, dull, weak and dumb. You may think it can't be so, but history proves otherwise. By following the woke hollyweird films and giving them your money, you support this dilution of culture into something akin to dishwater mixed in with days old sink froth. Luckily most people don't watch woke Hollyweird films and seek out the good ones. Just requires these barely conscious film producers to figure this out.
I enjoyed watching this video. Thank you Barbara, Michael and Carry. Thank you for the movie. I just love the story (it really touched me...and it's been months..I love the actors esp. Lea and Daniel, and the whole team/crew really for their collaboration. Without them, the success of this film would not be possible. Insights from Guillermo is also interesting, I enjoyed this series. This movie deserve many film awards! 😀
I am hoping they do a next interview with actors/actresses too. Like Eric Christian Olsen, Chicha Amatayakul. Lee Jung-Jae, Neve Campbell, Jenna Ortega or anyone else. And also the previous bond actors like Rosamund Pike, Halle Berry, Mads Mikkelsen, Toby Stephens, Michelle Yeoh giving their insight.
Along with Timothy Dalton, Rick Yune, Andrew Scott, Putter Smith, Jonathan Pryce, Art Malik, Jane Seymour, Bruce Glover, Robert Carlyle, Javier Bardem, Anthony Zerbe, Sean Bean, Eva Green, Mathieu Amalric, Gloria Hendry, Isaach De Bankole, Billy Magnussen and countless others.
This movie was fantastic. After three viewings it might very well be my favorite Bond film. It's so great to Guillermo's love and enthusiasm for the film.
Amazing! A small request- shall we expect to see more lengthy in-depth talks with Chris Corbould, Suttirat Anne Larlarb and Linus on their processes and strategies used for the film? Earlier 3-4 min clips were not exactly sufficient and would truly love to hear more from them. Oh and yes, can we expect some ravishing scenes with the Aston Martin Valkyrie in the next Bond film, quiet a teaser was it at the wind tunnel scene with M.
They way that their teams hustle is so amazing it very, very hard to find words. For me, I see them mulch material at a phenomenal adrenaline pumping rate it is scary. Hundreds and hundreds of people working round the clock for that shot, in this case loading Bond 26. I will say, if you submit a toned idea, they've been through your hotel room suits with Red camera loaded helicopter totally clocked before you even notice they've already taken a bite and given you a sound track and production treatment short. They're like a good for you and brilliant 007 government.
I AM A HUGE FAN OF JAMES BOND from India I want to take part in such discussions to present my personal point of view. Please organize some friendly conversation with International fans. Please 🙏🙏
I love seeing filmmakers give interviews, they actually have the credibility to have informed and interesting conversations with the artistic team. Rather than some bimbo blond interviewer who knows nothing about filmmaking lmao
Great talk but REALLY surprised at the poor cuts/editing. Simple audio dissolves would have made all the difference, as I was jolted out of the discussion more than once.
I've seen every bond flick at the theater since thunderbolt and I never in my life ever dreamed they would kill him off like this. EXTREMELY disappointed!
I LOVE Casino Royale. I wish I could love this movie. Ive watched maybe 5-6 times now and I think I keep trying to find magic in it but it just isn't there, for me atleast. I think it bothers me that they get an actor like Rami who just came off a superb performance that was full of energy just to have him be this lack of energy, mediocre villain. The ending, the death scene just seems so dumb to me. I get what they were trying to do, but how selfish does Bond come off that he rather die because he can't touch them yet he could live and always be around to protect them and see his daughter grow and not be without a father like he was. Its kinda frustrating the more I think about it. I think what really held these movies back after Casino, is that they all connected. And so you have to explain what's happening because of what came before. Cary did a great job and making Madeline a more fleshed out character and getting the chemistry between the two actors to actually be there. But after Spectre I was ready for her and Blofeld to never be mentioned again. I hope the next set of films is more focus and planned. I would be ok with them even remaking the stories from the books again like Dr. No, etc. Craig would have been perfect to have remade those stories after Casino, but oh well.
NTTD is pure magic and comfort food viewing for me and hits me hard emotionally , don't think Rami gets enough credit for the understated eeriness and yes Bond accepts his fate , but it's not like he had a choice , he was bleeding to death from at least two bullet wounds and ran out of time as the missiles rained down
@@888bangthory I respect everyone’s own personal view on the movie but those two gun shot wounds are nothing for bond lol. He got shot twice in Skyfall and he was just fine. Remember Casino and Quantum are basically all in the same time frame and he did allllll of that and walked away just fine.
@@bramford7e No. They're just going to reboot it like they did with Casino Royale. Craig's Bond isn't the same as Connery to Brosnan. The next Bond won't be either of those.
How to make a REAL BOND MOVIE: 1) A strong masculine handsome leading man... no wimpy pansies. 2) A good story line. With believable action sequences. You know-- improbable but not impossible! 3) Awesome gadgets. 4) A car that exudes COOL, with spy features to die for. 5) No political correctness... we don't care about socially acceptable crap. We want a REAL MAN --- NOT A WUSS. 6) GIVE US WHAT WE WANT!!! 7) You will make a billion dollars or more ! 8) Listen to me !!!!!! Signed, The REAL JB
This bloody Rami Malek simply at all times isn't a believable baddie at all, to the point Rami Malek simply at all times (at best) makes Peter Cheng Ho look like The Joker or Two-Face in The Dark Knight.
They messed up big time! Fukunaga was a poor choice to top off the franchise feat Daniel Craig. I Found that the scenes, specially the action ones, which are distinctive of 007 movies, were thrown together as opposite to say Skyfall or Casino Royale. Martin Campbell would’ve done a better job or other action specialist such as John Frankenheimer or Michael Mann. The end itself was ridiculous having an experienced MI6 agent who had gone though everything under the sun going to a trap for fools.
You made a crap film and distroyed the franchise. Who the f*** wants to see bond fall in love every other film??? And don't get me started on the child thing and the ending... Just WTF were you thinking?!?!?!!!
I'm surprised Guillermo del Toro loves this film despite the deeply flawed screenplay. On one hand we have an emotionally driven narrative but it's loaded with contrived plot points and is driven by it's ending rather than the ending being an organic part of the story. In the end it's a pretentious Bond film (the most pretentious to date). I guess Guillermo and other fans are willing to overlook NTTD's problems and just go along for the ride. That's fine, but I can't understand why Spectre is so hated.
0:28 we know that feeling bro, was a very bad, bad , bad, bad movie, starting with the script all trash, nonsense, and the ridiculous final, the worst Bond ever, a waste of actors like Remi Malek (The villain is absurd, very bad written, it falls like a cartoon, and that foolish name: Lutcifer hahaha), Ana de Armas(she shine but just a few minutes), nice photography and sound but the movie script is trash
Loving these series of super insightful interviews with Bong and now Guillermo. Nice to see that they, too, are fans. Can't wait to see the next one.
Next up, low IQ Hollywood 'goes woke, goes broke' with Bond. What they don't understand is that James Bond is supposed to be debonair, a rough diamond, somewhat brazen, an adventurer and, yes, an expert seducer. Since some Hollywood types only have a vocabulary of about 4 adjectives, it is hardly surprising that Bond has recently been labelled 'sexist' 'not current' etc, but let me explain why this is predictable drivel
1) It is merely a fact that some spies, past and present, male and female were adventurers, had to be brazen and were expert seducers. This was in order to gain information, set honeytraps and so on.
2)There is nothing triggering about a man being a rogue loner with wry wit. There is nothing inherently sexist about a man seducing a woman, or multiple women in the context of the story or generally, depending on context. We live in an era where women quite casually gloat about having 10 boyfriends who believe they are wild ass kickers. Should there be a show where women go around conquering in some manner, for example? There already have been many shows of such nature. Context is everything.
3) If Bond is just a guy who goes around punching people then talking about War and Peace with his granny, or nattering about some political issue which no woke person understands (all lazy, woke people should stay away from politics since their brains can only process 5 percent of any issue and make up their gibberish based on that) or having a cup of hot milk before bed we are in a different film all together. That film might be good, or it might be horrible. It might look like a crude and lacklustre version of Jason Bourne. Most people who support a woke Bond wouldn't understand an intellectual film either. Why not keep tastes separate so you can appreciate each one?
4) Audiences are smart enough to know what fiction is. No human can fend off 200 henchmen weilding machine guns with an ankle pistol, anyway. They can certainly build themselves to be formidable warriors, but they can't do that. Therefore, you might as well accept that these are archetypes. They have some basis in reality but take the audience into a sense of extraordinary.
5) Not everyone lives a boring life. Yes most woke people live with their moms till 50. However there, amazingly enough, really still exists people who know that having 50 genders will not make you interesting, impressive, worldly nor will it give you stories to tell your grandkids. Some people really do travel the world, drink exotic drinks, meet many unique people and, yes, do many more of the things Bond does. There are even people who have a 'settled' life, who still exist within a paridigm of adventure and actually achieve things.
So there we have it. Although you will not want to hear this final, slightly conspiritoral point. There will always be someone who benefits from humans being bland, dull, weak and dumb. You may think it can't be so, but history proves otherwise. By following the woke hollyweird films and giving them your money, you support this dilution of culture into something akin to dishwater mixed in with days old sink froth. Luckily most people don't watch woke Hollyweird films and seek out the good ones. Just requires these barely conscious film producers to figure this out.
@@tommckellen4289 i ain't reading all that. i'm happy for u tho. or sorry that happened.
Barbara is such a cutie.... love her energy...Carey is so underrated and awesome with the camera. Rami is a true actor and brings raw emotions on screen.. great conversation here
Next up, low IQ Hollywood 'goes woke, goes broke' with Bond. What they don't understand is that James Bond is supposed to be debonair, a rough diamond, somewhat brazen, an adventurer and, yes, an expert seducer. Since some Hollywood types only have a vocabulary of about 4 adjectives, it is hardly surprising that Bond has recently been labelled 'sexist' 'not current' etc, but let me explain why this is predictable drivel
1) It is merely a fact that some spies, past and present, male and female were adventurers, had to be brazen and were expert seducers. This was in order to gain information, set honeytraps and so on.
2)There is nothing triggering about a man being a rogue loner with wry wit. There is nothing inherently sexist about a man seducing a woman, or multiple women in the context of the story or generally, depending on context. We live in an era where women quite casually gloat about having 10 boyfriends who believe they are wild ass kickers. Should there be a show where women go around conquering in some manner, for example? There already have been many shows of such nature. Context is everything.
3) If Bond is just a guy who goes around punching people then talking about War and Peace with his granny, or nattering about some political issue which no woke person understands (all lazy, woke people should stay away from politics since their brains can only process 5 percent of any issue and make up their gibberish based on that) or having a cup of hot milk before bed we are in a different film all together. That film might be good, or it might be horrible. It might look like a crude and lacklustre version of Jason Bourne. Most people who support a woke Bond wouldn't understand an intellectual film either. Why not keep tastes separate so you can appreciate each one?
4) Audiences are smart enough to know what fiction is. No human can fend off 200 henchmen weilding machine guns with an ankle pistol, anyway. They can certainly build themselves to be formidable warriors, but they can't do that. Therefore, you might as well accept that these are archetypes. They have some basis in reality but take the audience into a sense of extraordinary.
5) Not everyone lives a boring life. Yes most woke people live with their moms till 50. However there, amazingly enough, really still exists people who know that having 50 genders will not make you interesting, impressive, worldly nor will it give you stories to tell your grandkids. Some people really do travel the world, drink exotic drinks, meet many unique people and, yes, do many more of the things Bond does. There are even people who have a 'settled' life, who still exist within a paridigm of adventure and actually achieve things.
So there we have it. Although you will not want to hear this final, slightly conspiritoral point. There will always be someone who benefits from humans being bland, dull, weak and dumb. You may think it can't be so, but history proves otherwise. By following the woke hollyweird films and giving them your money, you support this dilution of culture into something akin to dishwater mixed in with days old sink froth. Luckily most people don't watch woke Hollyweird films and seek out the good ones. Just requires these barely conscious film producers to figure this out.
A conversation with Alfonso Cuarón would also be interesting.
These conversations are superb. More of these please!
That, my friend, is the magic of Roger Deakins at work. He also did the cinematography for 1984, Shawshank Redemption, Fargo, The Big Lebowski, A Beautiful Mind, Oh Brother Where Art Thou, No Country For Old Men, The Assassination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford, True Grit, Rango, Blade Runner 2049, and 1917. I honestly don't think there's a person in Hollywood better at making a scene look beautiful than him.
THIS FILM WAS SO GOOD ABSOLUTELY LOVED IT
Mkokikll
I loved Guillermo Del Toro's profound take on the movie. It's about loss.
Always loved his profound takes on movies whenever he interviews filmmakers. Like a movie philosopher.
Hoo do see see whoy
Next up, low IQ Hollywood 'goes woke, goes broke' with Bond. What they don't understand is that James Bond is supposed to be debonair, a rough diamond, somewhat brazen, an adventurer and, yes, an expert seducer. Since some Hollywood types only have a vocabulary of about 4 adjectives, it is hardly surprising that Bond has recently been labelled 'sexist' 'not current' etc, but let me explain why this is predictable drivel
1) It is merely a fact that some spies, past and present, male and female were adventurers, had to be brazen and were expert seducers. This was in order to gain information, set honeytraps and so on.
2)There is nothing triggering about a man being a rogue loner with wry wit. There is nothing inherently sexist about a man seducing a woman, or multiple women in the context of the story or generally, depending on context. We live in an era where women quite casually gloat about having 10 boyfriends who believe they are wild ass kickers. Should there be a show where women go around conquering in some manner, for example? There already have been many shows of such nature. Context is everything.
3) If Bond is just a guy who goes around punching people then talking about War and Peace with his granny, or nattering about some political issue which no woke person understands (all lazy, woke people should stay away from politics since their brains can only process 5 percent of any issue and make up their gibberish based on that) or having a cup of hot milk before bed we are in a different film all together. That film might be good, or it might be horrible. It might look like a crude and lacklustre version of Jason Bourne. Most people who support a woke Bond wouldn't understand an intellectual film either. Why not keep tastes separate so you can appreciate each one?
4) Audiences are smart enough to know what fiction is. No human can fend off 200 henchmen weilding machine guns with an ankle pistol, anyway. They can certainly build themselves to be formidable warriors, but they can't do that. Therefore, you might as well accept that these are archetypes. They have some basis in reality but take the audience into a sense of extraordinary.
5) Not everyone lives a boring life. Yes most woke people live with their moms till 50. However there, amazingly enough, really still exists people who know that having 50 genders will not make you interesting, impressive, worldly nor will it give you stories to tell your grandkids. Some people really do travel the world, drink exotic drinks, meet many unique people and, yes, do many more of the things Bond does. There are even people who have a 'settled' life, who still exist within a paridigm of adventure and actually achieve things.
So there we have it. Although you will not want to hear this final, slightly conspiritoral point. There will always be someone who benefits from humans being bland, dull, weak and dumb. You may think it can't be so, but history proves otherwise. By following the woke hollyweird films and giving them your money, you support this dilution of culture into something akin to dishwater mixed in with days old sink froth. Luckily most people don't watch woke Hollyweird films and seek out the good ones. Just requires these barely conscious film producers to figure this out.
I enjoyed watching this video. Thank you Barbara, Michael and Carry. Thank you for the movie. I just love the story (it really touched me...and it's been months..I love the actors esp. Lea and Daniel, and the whole team/crew really for their collaboration. Without them, the success of this film would not be possible. Insights from Guillermo is also interesting, I enjoyed this series. This movie deserve many film awards! 😀
I also had the thought that Safin poisoned Mr. White instead of Blofeld, it makes sense instead of Hinx or Sciarra.
2nd!! Loved the movie! I thoroughly enjoyed the series! ❤️ 🇬🇧 🇳🇴
Thanks for these videos.
I just keep on looking at Guillermo Del Toro's study. Wondering what kind of books he read, the kind of framed pictures on his wall.
Gothic stuff?
You could look at his twitter and listen to his forums with the likes of Coens and also about his films.
I am hoping they do a next interview with actors/actresses too. Like Eric Christian Olsen, Chicha Amatayakul. Lee Jung-Jae, Neve Campbell, Jenna Ortega or anyone else. And also the previous bond actors like Rosamund Pike, Halle Berry, Mads Mikkelsen, Toby Stephens, Michelle Yeoh giving their insight.
Along with Timothy Dalton, Rick Yune, Andrew Scott, Putter Smith, Jonathan Pryce, Art Malik, Jane Seymour, Bruce Glover, Robert Carlyle, Javier Bardem, Anthony Zerbe, Sean Bean, Eva Green, Mathieu Amalric, Gloria Hendry, Isaach De Bankole, Billy Magnussen and countless others.
Amazing content. Much much more of this style please
This movie was fantastic. After three viewings it might very well be my favorite Bond film. It's so great to Guillermo's love and enthusiasm for the film.
Memories from John Connor. He started acting as the 007 & the tallest to be until today!
I see Rami Malek, I click.
Amazing! A small request- shall we expect to see more lengthy in-depth talks with Chris Corbould, Suttirat Anne Larlarb and Linus on their processes and strategies used for the film? Earlier 3-4 min clips were not exactly sufficient and would truly love to hear more from them. Oh and yes, can we expect some ravishing scenes with the Aston Martin Valkyrie in the next Bond film, quiet a teaser was it at the wind tunnel scene with M.
Barbara Broccoli a baddie frfr
Indeed. Hope she doesn't fall for the pressure of casting a big star and remains headstrong this time too.
They way that their teams hustle is so amazing it very, very hard to find words. For me, I see them mulch material at a phenomenal adrenaline pumping rate it is scary. Hundreds and hundreds of people working round the clock for that shot, in this case loading Bond 26. I will say, if you submit a toned idea, they've been through your hotel room suits with Red camera loaded helicopter totally clocked before you even notice they've already taken a bite and given you a sound track and production treatment short. They're like a good for you and brilliant 007 government.
I AM A HUGE FAN OF JAMES BOND from India I want to take part in such discussions to present my personal point of view. Please organize some friendly conversation with International fans. Please 🙏🙏
Vhai ye kya baat kar rahe ho 💁🙆🙅🤦♂️ ye log movie ke director aur makers hai why would they allow you to talk between them?
This was a Fine job.
Nice compliment from Del Toro about Barbara's previous films, only 1 Michiline Star rating apparently. Bet shes flattered
I love seeing filmmakers give interviews, they actually have the credibility to have informed and interesting conversations with the artistic team. Rather than some bimbo blond interviewer who knows nothing about filmmaking lmao
When can we see in cinema?
Nice piece
Smart boy 😁
Guillermo del Toro is so aaaaaaaw :D
Great
Barbara looks so noble, she easily could have been a bond girl in an alternative reality, ehehe.
SHE'S Hot for sure
I really love you
I own the whole set of First British Edition James Bond books.
I would luv to do that am a huge 007 fan
Nice
Interesting
Amazing. Is it just me or was NTTD pre-titles too long ?
good
Great talk but REALLY surprised at the poor cuts/editing. Simple audio dissolves would have made all the difference, as I was jolted out of the discussion more than once.
Totally agree with you!!
I love this 😀 ❤️ please keep it up
Ciudad del Carmen
Schade das er weg ist
I've seen every bond flick at the theater since thunderbolt and I never in my life ever dreamed they would kill him off like this. EXTREMELY disappointed!
This movie is part of the ever loving movies I've ever watched.
I LOVE Casino Royale. I wish I could love this movie. Ive watched maybe 5-6 times now and I think I keep trying to find magic in it but it just isn't there, for me atleast. I think it bothers me that they get an actor like Rami who just came off a superb performance that was full of energy just to have him be this lack of energy, mediocre villain. The ending, the death scene just seems so dumb to me. I get what they were trying to do, but how selfish does Bond come off that he rather die because he can't touch them yet he could live and always be around to protect them and see his daughter grow and not be without a father like he was. Its kinda frustrating the more I think about it. I think what really held these movies back after Casino, is that they all connected. And so you have to explain what's happening because of what came before. Cary did a great job and making Madeline a more fleshed out character and getting the chemistry between the two actors to actually be there. But after Spectre I was ready for her and Blofeld to never be mentioned again. I hope the next set of films is more focus and planned. I would be ok with them even remaking the stories from the books again like Dr. No, etc. Craig would have been perfect to have remade those stories after Casino, but oh well.
NTTD is pure magic and comfort food viewing for me and hits me hard emotionally , don't think Rami gets enough credit for the understated eeriness and yes Bond accepts his fate , but it's not like he had a choice , he was bleeding to death from at least two bullet wounds and ran out of time as the missiles rained down
@@888bangthory I respect everyone’s own personal view on the movie but those two gun shot wounds are nothing for bond lol. He got shot twice in Skyfall and he was just fine. Remember Casino and Quantum are basically all in the same time frame and he did allllll of that and walked away just fine.
Bond has officially died, will he come back?
Interesting fact 007 originally meaning stood for 2 eyes as for the queen's eyes only and 7 as it was a lucky number to offer protection.
@@incognito6313 interesting
Aiden Turner as the next James Bond. Making it happen!
Get Quentin Tarantino next!
Noooo
Killing Bond was a dumb idea. Having said that, it’ll be interesting to see how they bring him back.
I think he's dead for good. As I understand it the future Bond movies will take place pre-NTTD as the movies will not be in chronological order.
@@bramford7e No. They're just going to reboot it like they did with Casino Royale.
Craig's Bond isn't the same as Connery to Brosnan. The next Bond won't be either of those.
Guillermo del Toro
Hi support
Guillermo del Torro should made a Bond Movie!!!
Ravan movie Manohar Khasra MP Shivani India world record
Del Toro looks like Nambi Narayanan
How to make a REAL BOND MOVIE:
1) A strong masculine handsome leading man... no wimpy pansies.
2) A good story line. With believable action sequences. You know-- improbable but not impossible!
3) Awesome gadgets.
4) A car that exudes COOL, with spy features to die for.
5) No political correctness... we don't care about socially acceptable crap. We want a REAL MAN --- NOT A WUSS.
6) GIVE US WHAT WE WANT!!!
7) You will make a billion dollars or more !
8) Listen to me !!!!!!
Signed,
The REAL JB
Announce next james bond now
Bond has officially died, will he come back ever?
I don’t know why Rami Malek is popular. I can’t stand him in anything.. He is always ‘acting’ unlike other actors who you don’t notice are ‘acting’!
I think he played this character too over the top.
There's only one real Bond and that's Sean, this show's name should've been changed decades ago
This Film is just an ordinary action movie. It's not Bond movie. Fukunaga didn't treat the Bond character with respect.
All the Brits most called a shitt Bond it's so definitely Real from the Man of Bond movie .
blablabla :)
The volatile flood cytopathologically suppose because game pathogenetically drip by a untidy father. measly, aromatic diving
It's a bland movie that strays too much away from the Bond formula.
Making a good movie isn't the same as making a good Bond movie.
I was sadly disappointed by the film - the story, the stunt work, the scene development, - I thought Quantum was better!!
Wow, the editing alone puts that on the bottom barrel. Stunt work and plot structure was fantastic in this.
Stunt work?? Those Land Rovers were knocked off the road by a Toyota!!?
This bloody Rami Malek simply at all times isn't a believable baddie at all, to the point Rami Malek simply at all times (at best) makes Peter Cheng Ho look like The Joker or Two-Face in The Dark Knight.
He was far better than Waltz in Spectre, heck Waltz was better in this than Spectre.
They messed up big time! Fukunaga was a poor choice to top off the franchise feat Daniel Craig. I Found that the scenes, specially the action ones, which are distinctive of 007 movies, were thrown together as opposite to say Skyfall or Casino Royale. Martin Campbell would’ve done a better job or other action specialist such as John Frankenheimer or Michael Mann. The end itself was ridiculous having an experienced MI6 agent who had gone though everything under the sun going to a trap for fools.
You made a crap film and distroyed the franchise. Who the f*** wants to see bond fall in love every other film??? And don't get me started on the child thing and the ending... Just WTF were you thinking?!?!?!!!
Yup, it's a mess.
Cry
I'm surprised Guillermo del Toro loves this film despite the deeply flawed screenplay. On one hand we have an emotionally driven narrative but it's loaded with contrived plot points and is driven by it's ending rather than the ending being an organic part of the story. In the end it's a pretentious Bond film (the most pretentious to date). I guess Guillermo and other fans are willing to overlook NTTD's problems and just go along for the ride. That's fine, but I can't understand why Spectre is so hated.
Looks like no time to die is simply (at best) at all times an attempt to pander to racial + gender equality advocates.
0:28 we know that feeling bro, was a very bad, bad , bad, bad movie, starting with the script all trash, nonsense, and the ridiculous final, the worst Bond ever, a waste of actors like Remi Malek (The villain is absurd, very bad written, it falls like a cartoon, and that foolish name: Lutcifer hahaha), Ana de Armas(she shine but just a few minutes), nice photography and sound but the movie script is trash
🚮🚮🚮
Just bought the movie...WORST Bond film since Moonraker ...
True - so true-
Too bad too - I was so looking forward to it!! Disappointed!
That's too bad. I thought it was in the top 3. I hope the next one finds a way to bring the magic back for you.
Overexaggeration as usual. It's a good film, proper action and stakes.