Yuval Harari with Dan Ariely: Future Think-From Sapiens to Homo Deus
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- In his new book, Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, Harari examines what might happen to the world when these old myths are coupled with new godlike technologies such as artificial intelligence and genetic engineering. What will happen to democracy if and when Google and Facebook come to know our likes and our political preferences better than we know them ourselves? What will happen to the welfare state when computers push humans out of the job market and create a massive new “useless class”? How might Islam, Christianity and Judaism handle genetic engineering? Will Silicon Valley end up producing new religions, rather than just novel gadgets?
Subscribe for more videos like this: bit.ly/1GpwawV
Your support helps us keep our content free for all. Donate now: www.92y.org/don...
Facebook: / 92ndstreety
Instagram: / 92ndstreety
Twitter: / 92y
Tumblr: / 92y
On Demand: www.92yondemand...
![Cody Johnson - I'm Gonna Love You (with Carrie Underwood) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yy9PuYMU29g/mqdefault.jpg)
11:44
'As a historian I know that we should never underestimate "HUMAN STUPIDITY". It's one of the most powerful forces in History'!!
I have watched dozens of Yuval’s videos
This is the first time I saw him carefully phrase his words
Pushing him out of comfort zone actually resulted in great answers
Thank you very much Dan
I agree that he was made to look into his own valid assumptions and seek more clarity on what his research as a historian of humans, to come out with more scepticism, than being defensive, as in normal debates! Simply original and profound to make us to think & think to search for better answers for the present context & its contradictions, we face as humans and as thinking Society 👍👍🎉 Your are really a refreshing thinker of 21st Century!! ❤️👍
This man and his kabbal are truly evil this is not a conspiracy theory they openly talk about it they dont fear the people they want to subjugate us and bring us into serfdom through technocracy authoritarianship all in the name of conveniance and "we know best mentality " The WEF and those behind it are the single biggest threat the wolrd has seen in a long time. They have successfuly persuaded or esatblisued their own govements in the west and all their policys are being implemented under our noses without a single vote from the people.
There are lot of comments bashing Dan Ariely although he is clearly not just an interviewer. Yuval Harari is a great teacher, I would argue maybe even better and more important than Ariely. But if I was to chose between them for a mentor it would always be Ariely. I think he made some nice challenges to Yuval Harari and also exposed him a bit in a new way. There is no question that Harari has many answers that are based on statistics and empiric from history but he is behaving like an robot in a way. It seems that is what Dan Ariely was trying to tell him especially with the last question about the "best joke". It looks like Harary was aware of that the moment he stoped speaking. It was like he was saying to him You are a great wise man and You brought us summaries about so much regarding inteligence, consciousness , life , meaning and everything else and yet still it seems that You haven't really experienced it, being a human... There is an other interview in which Harari says that to him happiness is expanding knowledge and understanding truth and reality. But maybe that is not enough. Maybe we also need to intensely live it.
Beautifully said
Hmm...I really enjoyed this discussion and got a bit surprised seeing the comments.
Yes Ariely was a bit mocking but if you heard his other talks he has this kind of humor and Harari took it as lightheartedly as it was meant I guess. I don't see your problem.
Macro vs micro
I agree with you.
Thinker vs Feeler
Dan added so much to the conversation, he made it fantastically stimulating. The playful poking he did, really got Yuval to phrase his ideas very differently. Thanks for this, guys. Loved the discussion.
L
I disagree, in fact, the opposite
I bet you live in Canada and most of your people will drag us who oppose this shit right into it since you're all addicted to and obsessed with technology, Thanks, well not really!
I live average life with average people earning average wage and pay average bills and somehow i am watching this extraordinary discussion. It is so refreshing. 2017 was three years ago. Mind blowing; one ability to speak in such a volume and depth and richness..i can not get enough. It is so complex. It is valuable but it wont save human race from self destruction
as someone who has read Harari's book and taken Dan's irrationality course, I can firmly say whatever rudeness some may sense is more a reflection about themselves - these are two world experts (so naturally a bit opinionated) agreeing and disagreeing on things with a bit of humor and the proverbial pulling of the leg; don't take stubborn sides and groupthink people - ideas no matter how good you may perceive left unchallenged become dogmas and ideologies
fucking yes man... totally agree with you. People here are like seeing the conversation with a competitive filter, and that keeps out the reality, two intelligent persons being natural and at the same time professional.
+rockersamurai Dude it's not challenging somebody intellectually for arielly to interrupt with stupid remarks that could've derailed things many times. Surprisingly I found it a really good interview. Yuval was really good.
@@xkorpy3 i dont see any wisdom in the host, dan, is it his name? clearly Yuval and Dan have different scale of perspective/horizon. a waste of one hour of mine.
best interview ever done with Harari.
Even not so surprising to see how superficial and biased most people are when it comes to those they praise and attack. You can see in comments that those who like Mr. Harari (never mind the reasons) simply attack and criticise Mr. Ariely, though, Harari keeps giving cliche, easy and prepared responses. It's depressing that even when it comes to scholars and intellectuals, people still treat the same way they would have, in case of their favourite musicians or phone brands!
Please just analyse for yourselves. Read (if you don't mind!) and watch different scholars with different perspectives and form an idea for yourself.
People like praising those they know, those they are comfortable with and have accepted in advance, and sadly most of them don't even listen to their opposite sides properly.
This is the best interview with Harari I've ever seen... I bet he had a lot of fun.
I like both. They are writer of very good books!
It is a really entertaining chat between two tycoons of social science. Ariely successfully pushes Harari out of his comfort zone, trying to get new things of him, and some statements on his personal standpoint on religion. Entirely fair: given that Harari dedicated his second book to what seems to have been his meditation teacher, and he had just made a vegan statement at the beginning. It's good to see Harari dealing with both transcendental questions and some just as unsettling as "What is your favourite Joke?". Both guys are quite authentic, none of them easy going and show men. It's a blessing to have them around.
This man and his kabbal are truly evil this is not a conspiracy theory they openly talk about it they dont fear the people they want to subjugate us and bring us into serfdom through technocracy authoritarianship all in the name of conveniance and "we know best mentality " The WEF and those behind it are the single biggest threat the wolrd has seen in a long time. They have successfuly persuaded or esatblisued their own govements in the west and all their policys are being implemented under our noses without a single vote from the people.
There seems to be a lot of Jewish humor in this which escapes us heathen. Something about the perfect argument. Good arguing style, too. The using the "depressed" label is really a joke. Harari's body language is eloquent enough to the contrary. Very enjoyable talk. Good job by Ariely to lure Harari away from his pre-meditated lectures.
I was told the end game. It is selective parenting. The 133 investment families that established IMF and run the macro-economic system to their benefit disagree on quite a bit. Actually everything but one and that is selective parenting. She said the goal is all babies are fixed at birth. I wonder if these "elites" who THINK technology will always be there have thought about a solar flare.
They have no idea what the future will looks like yet have it all planned out for us. This guy has said when the catastrophe strikes they need to step in with a global authoritarian rule. The same old recycled bullshit with a new coat of paint. Money changers control the serfs. If he sees us as animals we are expendable as long as we don't suffer? Well euthanasia does that. The things that have made societies secure and cooperative are nation-states, communities and the ability to provide for our families. He like many modern academics see humans as a cancer not something wonderful. They also go to Davos once a year Those who seek to control the world destroy it. There have ALWAYS been those who control things largely through deception and I see him as no different. I would venture to bet he is a loyalist to one of these families the narrative is to close to what they say is GOING to happen.
Those who believe they will tax them or bring about change need to understand they've survived for 86 generations. They are semi-autnotomous and global and literally above the law. They feel nation-states have outlived their usefulness and believe in corporate installed Oligarchies. ( That is the definition of a Globalist in the true sense, those who believe in corporate installed Oligarchies over nation-states.) As I stated before he is either in one of these families or is a loyalist pushing their agenda. You can bet their 100 estates and opulent lifestyles will not change but ours will.
She flat admitted man-made Climate Change is BS but they make billions of of the idea there fore promote it until recently. She said it is getting in the way of real science and has created to many soldiers marching and beating their drums for the cause. I was open to the idea until she told me the flat truth. I do see their family publications haven't stopped promoting the idea. This isn't to say pollution garbage and human waste isn't a problem because it is. It just isn't CO2 emissions but the Titans of Industry make billions off of exchanging carbon credits and have the added bonus of knocking out smaller competion. They couldn't get people to stop having children if they told the flat truth. Like he pointed out humans need a story..... I have a story. They are making economic zones and she said nation-states were created as a way to serve the banks and commerce. Beast of the Earth will soon be arising as they will be merging the 3 central banks of North America. Asia is the third that will coalesce in about 10 years. The bible doesn't mention the third so either it is irrelevant in creating the cashless society or things are going to start moving quickly but those idiots that wrote this 2,000 years ago were just backward homo sapiens that needed a story...
Xd+Teri Cottone You do know what the Book of Daniel says? And Revelation? People love to try to take the Bible and distort and lie about it. Do you like the agenda being pushed today? Do anything for money, Sex with everything, POPULATION CONTROL? How about Shariah and FGM, why now, there's Jonathan AC Brown right there at Georgetown University teaching that Slavery is MORAL because Mohamed owned slaves and you can't be more morally mature than that. NO DOGS FOR YOU. CONCUBINES KIDNAPPING CHILD RAPE. ETC. Shame you bash Biblical Knowledge when it clearly outlines human behavior and human history. The evil inclination of the heart is still with us in this day.
Irma Walter
Well, I don't think it was Jewish humour (partly because I am not Jewish and I still understood it ). It was just humour. I think Dan Ariely represented a caricaturised version of "everyday common sense" as a contrast to Harari's careful, well thought out, academic speaking style to get original answers.
Two brilliant minds meet to discuss our future. Excellent questions & answers.
correction: One brilliant mind. Harari's. The other guy is thick.
I was gonna say correction, One brilliant mind. Dan Ariely does useful serious research for humanity and has made many many excellent lectures on human interaction and patterns of the human mind, Harari pushes agendas, throws his religious and cultural biases around worse than american presidents, and write low-level dubious stories about humanity. How is that brilliant? I am yet to watch read or listen to anything from Harari that makes me go "Aha".
Huge difference here.
Empathy is the key out of the mass capitalism have created!
Yuval Harari, just thank you.
Incredible discussion. Thanks to Yuval and Dan.
I like Yuval but I also liked the interviewer a lot as well.
"Nationalism has no solution to climate change"
First, if you are going to take that approach, Professor Harari, then you better show that there actually is climate change (where the word 'change' has a precise definition). Climate has been know to be changing since the beginning of life on this planet. In fact, the word climate presupposes change. As far as we know climate has never been static although it was slow to change during the Permian when all the land masses were together to form Pangea and there wasn't (as far as we know) the equivalent of the Gulf Stream to help regulate the world temperatures and weather.
Second, the right is not about nationalism; although, those on the extreme right can be nationalistic. That is a leftist meme. Joseph Stalin was prone to speaking about 'Mother Russia' for example. Same with the Maoists who developed a type of nationalism that was pernicious to the extreme. The current CCP is carrying on Mao's nationalist tradition (especially with the Uighurs). Don't forget Hitler, who was a leftist, socialist and a nationalist. Don't forget Mussolini who was initially a communist and then invented fascism, which is a special variant of socialism in which very big business is allowed to retain its ownership of property and is allowed with certain restrictions to do what it wants as long as it cooperates with the government in doing so. Mussolini came up with this form of government because he saw the economic catastrophes created by the Soviet Union and he realized that government bureaucrats didn't have the experience to properly run large enterprises. Only the business leaders had that experience. In any case, Mussolini was an arch nationalist.
Getting back to climate change, it has been pointed out time and again that the best solution to climate change is to do nothing at all. It is estimated that the cost of attaining 100% reduction in Americas 'carbon foot print' would only result in a change of 0.07° Celsius by the end of the century (For the temperature change see page 3 of A RATIONAL LOOK AT CLIMATE CHANGE CONCERNS found here: scienceandpublicpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/rational_look.pdf ) To accomplish this would cost up to 1 trillion dollars. If America does nothing then it costs nothing and if the temperature rise calculation is correct even a thermometer wouldn't measure the difference!!! Meanwhile, China is in the process of building 100 coal generated power stations! China is the biggest polluter in the world and nothing is done about it. China has made it clear in writing and in public speaking its plan is to replace the United States as the world's superpower. It is gonna have its way if the US wastes up to 1 trillion dollars on this global warming/climate boondoggle while China uses a similar amount to make itself more powerful economically and militarily. What is interesting here is that China was exempted from the provisions of the Paris Accords because it was considered a developing nation!!!??? China is the second largest economy in the world and is highly developed in science, medicine, and military power. Why did the Paris Accords allow this ludicrous exemption, professor? This is what you should have been writing about!
Professor Harari, one of the hallmarks of science is prediction. Give one example of a prediction that any climate change alarmist has made that has turned out to be verified. As far as I know, there aren't any. On the other hand there is ample evidence that the alarmists have been shown wrong every time they make a prediction. For example: thenewamerican.com/climate-alarmists-have-been-wrong-about-virtually-everything/
Actually, the alarmist, almost always from the left, have been wrong in other areas. For example: ruclips.net/video/5BqD5klZsQE/видео.html
Don't forget Professor Harari, the alarmists were predicting another ice age being imminent back in 1975. In 1972 these scientists wrote to President Richard Nixon to get funding to help stop the glaciers before they became a real problem. One of their 'solutions' was to drop ton after ton of carbon soot in the Antarctic to absorb the Sun's heat and thereby warm up the planet!!! [Interesting example of a true carbon footprint.] By the way, did the science of climatology instantly change between 1975 and 1985 when all of a sudden the earth went from 'The glaciers are coming' to 'Our planet is frying'. Nope!! No new science but there were political (tax related) issues that 'changed' the science. These guys are a one trick pony show, professor. So, NO, the left has no solutions despite your claim. They have grifts, scams, and swindles! Hopefully, your next book will be titled HOMO CORRUPTUS and will deal in detail with the issues I've just discussed.
The last frame of the video:
1:08:13
Yuval greets in the Indian style with a namaste!!
Probably the influence of his Vipassana teacher S N Goenka.
Mr. Ariely's insistence on his semantics is annoying and highly indicative of someone who is a bully. His arrogance is insufferable.
i am surprised that a lot of the people commenting are fans of Yuval but have no idea about Dan.
They are having a great conversation. it sounds a bit off at first but when you start listening to the two they both have different colored inputs that make up for a great mix.
Yeah, strongly biased and opinionated people typically gets more fame and attention than real researchers and scientists. This is why Yuval is known but Dan Ariely is not. Dan's work is fantastic, but no one knows. Shame.
@@calysagora3615 I reject your assessment. Dan comes from a primarily leftist perspective and Yuval is a centrist...or apolitical, to be more accurate.
I love this. Two great thinkers from the same place in the world but with completely different styles, approaches and outlooks. Beautiful contrast. I tend to lean toward Harari's stoicism over Ariely's sanguine-ness, but both are wonderful.
Dan is a denialist with a vested interest.
At first I thought Dan was being arrogant, but then I remembered that Israelis love to argue - and I realised Dan was just trying to push Yuval into a more behavioural day to day point of view. Love both these guys!
lets us not forget the crux of the problems come from the fact there are to many people on the planet. Why are we not globally not doing anything about this?
This Dan....spoke more than the guest.? Questions to"stay" in camera...more time ?
Yuval doesn't know much about psychedelic drugs. He evinces a real lack of understanding of them by pretty much everything he asserts here.Usually he's spot on. I suppose we can't be experts on everything but USUALLY he quietens up when he knows he doesn't know.
I heard one of ways to constraint the selfishness and enhance the collaboration is to put everyone in the same boat.
Dan as a palliative care physician I face this question many times a month people face serious diseases, extremely difficult treatments that are prolonged surgeries, toxic medications, unending rehabilitation. Some accept the journey and some decline it. I think the more you can think in future and more clearly you understand how certain your quality of life is going to get affected long term makes a difference in decision.
Buddha became Buddha because he could feel the suffering of others.
Most educated people who can think in terms of quality of life and have had a decent life are ready stay thanks but no.
Those, who however have milestones to reach, engagement, marriage , graduation, childbirth, a milestone birthday anniversary or look forward to someone coming and seeing them everyday tend to hold on.
Harare is not depressed. But you my friend I think are profoundly affected by the incident. To be fair , You would not be human if you weren’t . I am very avid reader of your book writings and talks. Stay well and keep on doing the good work that you do !
Good work, to you transhumanism and manipulating controlling the human brain is good work. No he’s not depressed he’s living it as humanity is opressed.
The future is going to be full of good stories and bad choices XD
This turned out to be more of a "debate" with Dan Ariely showing off his experiments and challenging Yuval Harari of his ignorance of humans' irrational behaviour. From the MBTI perspective, Ariely is a Feeling type (ESF) while Harari is a Thinking type (INT), and they both tackle issues differently. Haha! I have more faith in historians than in social psychologists. The part 21:30 to 23:55 is spot on!
36:32 but wait.. how does a quadriplegic commit suicide?
🤣🤣nice observation
Netflix movies designed specifically for mushrooms.....You heard it on this channel first!
Modern day prophet
“When you really think big, most stories collapse.”
What was written on Dan's t-shirt ? "Bad choices make good... " How does it end ?
Good Stories ;)
It's so funny that they couldn't tell each other that they were talking about different things with the words "power" and "control". One was thinking about Foucault's theory while the other one was thinking about human beings overcoming helplessness in life.
fun to listen to these smart israelis
It was a great conversation, but I found myself so disappointed when Mr. Ariely pulled it away from Mr. Harari's discussion of the role of stories and our sense of wanting to find one that gives our lives meaning -- he was never able to get to how he resolved this desire without being depressed by not finding meaning in the larger stories of existence that science reveals to us. Does anyone know where Mr. Harari addresses this elsewhere online or in his writings? That and the intriguing discussion of science as mainly aimed at control -- without much room to discuss the moral implications of this were both interesting beginnings of conversations I could have listened to for many more hours.
Such an interest and fun interview between two great minds.
Dan Ariely sounds jeaulous and not at all bright. Envy is a bad thing. So bad it has spoilt this interview to the core. What a waste of a good opportunity to explore a great mind. Harari's that is.
Nice bunch of baseless assertions there. Ever studied the WORK of Dan Ariley? SMH.
Yuval is SO smart!
"Sadly enough, most people just never get the joke." xD
It's a better interview because he doesn't just agree with Yuval, like many of the others out there.
@20:00 you are lying. No such thing was said in the Bible. The story you're referring to is found in Genesis 17:16 "16 And I will bless her, and give thee a son also of her: yea, I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations; kings of people shall be of her.
17 Then Abraham fell upon his face, and laughed, and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is ninety years old, bear?"
Genesis 18
10 And he said, I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and, lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. And Sarah heard it in the tent door, which was behind him.
11 Now Abraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women.
12 Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also?
13 And the Lord said unto Abraham, Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying, Shall I of a surety bear a child, which am old?
14 Is any thing too hard for the Lord? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son.
15 Then Sarah denied, saying, I laughed not; for she was afraid. And he said, Nay; but thou didst laugh
So where is this lie you told @20:00
But what would you expect from two pencil necks who think they can create Homo Deus 2.0 better than what God has created. Same line as your father, kind of all lies, has told and desires...to be greater than God. You two have a rude awakening coming. I'd like to have a box of popcorn and watch as it unfolds.
Very compelling and enlightening , especially on Taking RESPONSIBILITY. Thank you very much.
Well of course the main value of science is power. To the extent that information (and therefore the truth) IS power. If you're curious and well informed (you know the truth), you're powerful. They are both closely linked together. That's all there is to the discussion. Information IS power. And power can be both good or bad, some people use their power for very good reasons and goals, some other use it for horrific ones. Science seeks the truth and therefore grants power to anyone curious enough to find it. That is it and there is nothing wrong with it either.
He used the word "control", but yeah, exactly, control or power is a result, but not the aim or agenda of science. It was a meaningless statement that most swallowed as some revelation here. LOL.
John 14:6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
1 Corinthians 15:3 that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures.
Romans 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 🌎
Mr. Harari is as eloquent and intelligent as ever... the interviewer however is obviously very intimidated by Yuval. He is so passive aggressive and competitive. Perhaps it is a cultural thing... nonetheless Yuval is so grounded and mature that it all moves right through him and he nails the points again and again. He is an Olympic thinker:)
Dan intimidated by Yuval? ROTFLMAO.
It's VERY clear how few commenters have ANY clue who Dan is or what he does. Pathetic.
Great conversation! I just don't understand why, a psychologist like Dan Ariely, could walk behind and ahead of his guest at the end?!!
"Fake News has been with us for a thousands of years, just think of the Bible......." - I burst out laughing when he said this.
a monster
As unexpected disruptive challenge or any significant change can't be taken over put an effect on our life, single entity is not allowed with resolution or stepping forward until others are participating collaboratively how powerful or influenceful it is. As money is one of impressive instrument evaluated at the modern society, people with success embody how rich they are. As for committing suicide, one is suffering from framed reality and one is desperately devouring wrecked news spread over. How desperate he may locked in, he keeps in meaningless life and he looks for alternatives for him to escape. Religion is spotting on someone because he wants someone over people to forgive his sins. As disruptive challenges, e.g. intelligence artificial make people afraid or threat to our value, we more rely on our imagination and creativity.
Turtles all the way down
Nature goes on forever for everyone and everything to return as everyone and everything an infinite number of times through evolutionary processes.
Dan might be some specialist, so what, I can't watch his way of interection, this whole conversation feels like he is ignorant bully, while Harari as always so impressive
The tiny wheel macroscopically stir because population conventionally serve after a discreet stage. cuddly, rare heat
Is that an evil thumbnail of a photo of Yuval estoteric Harari or what?
Say no to Aleister Crowley's fanboys.
What's the point of looking at a 10million year timeline? Perhaps your perspective is not a useful one.
Concebir como tener el control como fin de la ciencia está limitado. Por otro lado, Dan Ariely es tan ameno! Ahora si leeré los libros de Yuval y Dan.
Young Patricia Lewis Scott Thomas Ronald
I guess that’s progress: Moving from a Noah who built an ark, to one that would’ve drowned in the flood.
For a someone with such an impressive academic track record, Ariely seems surprisingly naive (e.g. re. the driving social forces behind science as a whole) and PC (e.g. when he balks at the word 'useless' when used of people or keeps insisting on the historic significance of the evil of Trump). I wonder if this is genuine or just anticipating what he thinks the average listener would want him to say.
I think people are right to complain a little about him: he overestimates his own jokes to the point even of repeating them (e.g. the one about Harari not having the right dealer), emphatically points out the biases of Republicans but not of Democrats in one of his examples, and talks quite a lot about himself (usually in ways that make him look good). If this was meant to be a balanced talk between equals, he didn't bring in his own expert thoughts enough (beyond mentioning a few very interesting but not entirely relevant experiments), if an interview of Harari, he made too much of a fuss about himself.
Harari is in a different league from Ariely but even as he thinks in a big way about the big problems in the long- term he does not deny himself a lot of 'cheap shots' warmly applauded by the herd-crowd. His remark about the Bible which is a foundation-document for all human religious, moral and literary understanding is a good example of this.
Mad men
The faithful love of the LORD never ends His mercies never cease.
Lamentations 3:22
Yuval , thank you so much for this, you were awesome !
So far it seems like one person is speaking on a global scale, the other is in a more narrow scale - basically focusing on the US or even specifically their current government
totally agree. he is So annoying.
Dan is not a very good critical thinker, very myopic questions.
This is the first interview I have seen on RUclips in which the interviewer speaks more than the interviewee.
hahaha first question: 'is Trump a threshold in the history of humanity?' seriously wtf
I truly believe Yuval's opinion about the true motives of science is accurate, the largest research funds go to academic areas which offer value in the form of control, and very little go to places that offer no control or control about unprofitable domains; e.g: the social sciences usually don't get as much funding as the more hardcore sciences (STEM) because they either offer little control or control over unprofitable domains.
maybe less funds isn't necessarilly a bad thing?
Dan Ariely = social science = do not use that word = because feelings
eating machines
that what we do
sapiens!
no such thing as
a jew
haiku
Interesting interview. The interviewer is wise and handled the interview well.
Why won't speak Latin then, mr. Deus Sapiens?
43:00 if the meaning of life does not come on the shape of a story, what shape does it take? Can anyone illuminate me and tell me if he had said more about it? Or if other people have? Thank you!
Marka Biti
Great question. I guess we all have to start small with whatever story we have. But then slowly start expanding so the story grows and becomes more complex
@@dr.ksartplace3785 thank you for your reply. Your reply is thst it's still in the form of a story though :p
In minute 12:25 Mr. Ariely mentioned the experiment of analyzing collaboration. I would challenge or suggest him, doing the same experiment changing money for other asset. Basically trying to avoid the additional forces that money creates, or imply. I used term additional forces, because we have been trained to believe money will solve all our problems, so our reaction to loose or win money is different in comparison to other asset. For this reason I would suggest to use other asset, to see if human collaboration swing as easy as Mr. Ariely mentioned.
Interviewer's being a bit disrespectful
interviewer is too busy thinking of what to say next to actually listen. The issue with Yuval is that few people can keep up with him to be able to properly interview him
Why? Yuvul says he didn't recognize he was gay till he was 20 something. Confused much? I mean "recognize" or programmed to be? He's a pencil neck weakling, never good at anything physical and has wet dreams about putting on an Iron man suit so he can "kick ass". Look at him. Bald, thin wrists, upper arms the same girth as the wrists...just a weak human being with the mind of a child watching cartoons. Feel sorry for him, and pray, because his awakening is going to be very painful for him...before he ceases to exist again.
07:00 As for the correlation of climate change denial and conservative thinkers, one could also argue to the contrary: "The purpose of a thing is what it does" (Stafford Beer). Climate change prevention, as it has been emphasized in recent years, goes in the direction of global governance. This may be the reason why it has been adopted by those who seek global powers.
+Irma though nations should really be able to work together and agree to some rule that is fair and reasonable without it having to be a global governing body. There could be voluntarily agreed upon things between nations.. like responsible nations have leaders that gather together and agree individually to control themselves. Rather than a bullying entity like the UN full of nasty gangs that votes against a country that has less voting power.
How about states and nations are IMAGINARY concepts, and only HUMANS can get along voluntarily. Nations/states per definition are NOT voluntary for the HUMANS suffering under them. (Taxation is theft by any other name). How about HUMANS get along voluntarily, and SCRAP nations, governments, religions, cultures and any other false and imaginary authorities, so we could finally have peace, prosparity and a rational and empirical base for getting along. Google voluntaryism.
At the core the message seems to be rebellion against Yah
The story is: we're here to Groove as One. Technology has clarified our purpose. Successful communities, through-out all cultures, have had a communal gathering that incorporated musical bonding. Our global community needs some proliferating. Instincts are said to do as such! Globally empowered, T,he One will begin with coincidences, growing with the number of Groovists, into miracles!! Groovism is the new digital religion!!
Yeah, Dan was obnoxious with his "positive " attitude, which was really narrow minded
Dan Ariley narrow minded? Good joke bro. Tried studying Dan's work? Didn't think so...
I was at this discussion and the entire audience around me seemed to also be quite annoyed with this interviewer. He was the absolute worst. Kudos to Yuval for drudging through it.
Read the comment below yours for some enlightenment. Prasant gets it. Yuvalu is a boooring monologist with a bias, and needed some poking. Try listening to Dan's lectures to understand more.
It is a conversation, not an interview. Now you know.
they have similar shoes
How big is the problem of death? Huge, but you can’t solve it! Therefore . .
How big is the problem of climate change? You can’t solve it! Therefore . . .
Two exceedingly brilliant minds discuss human perspective brilliantly! Kudos to both!
Of the 7+ billion we are, I don't know how many hace access to internet. Half? In any case, for a lot of people it would be easier with English subtitles. Any suggestion?
I'm really afraid of global worming
Yuval Harari is next level!
Yuval is not budging on the religion thing
Hi yuval, how the meditation change your day to day life ?, it make you more apathetic person - control your emotions ? (1) Are and how you deal with disrupts things like bad habits (2) ? and in other subject. how do you deal with the lack of anonymity ? because of saying your truth you are not afraid of struggle with Interest groups and governments? (3)
Markets today attract Greedy Speculators who only think short-term, so the Market is really the problem, NOT part of any solution to the Huge problems facing humanity.
Somebody should have briefed Ariely that Harari's concern and interest is in MACROhistory, not in currently trendy and fashionable issues that have been histerically glorified by fascist millitants.
Brilliant conversation.
Yuval is great !!!!
Your future isn't his to dictate. This is what he does every time you listen. His will being the rule is what he's covertly charming your mind into accepting as the status quo. It's not his place to dictate your future.