Bravo! The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion "Holes" in the ozone argument: 1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)? 2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ? 3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...") 4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?) 5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds? 6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place. I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths. The Ozone Scam ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+ Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone: ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud: Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?). ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html 1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda. Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers. ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?: ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html A discussion of atmospheric chlorine: api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel) "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used. Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it. ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning. ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html Lousy car air conditioning: ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html . Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
hg2 I’m an hvac contractor and had to get my EPA card and while I was reading the book about how CFCs were destroying the ozone we are going to replace them with hydrofluorocarbons I thought well that’s a good idea but wouldn’t pools and the chlorine that they put off into the atmosphere be just as bad if not worse than CFCs if what they are saying is true?
@@peterdarlington4117 Right. The EPA instructor in the last video says "... this isn't the chlorine you put in pools..." In other words there's two kinds of chlorine? Meanwhile, there's old ladies in Florida on fixed incomes who are getting told, "If you want AC you have to cough up $5000 to replace that R22 system you've got." And R22 wasn't even banned for ozone depletion by the stupid Montreal Protocol. It was for the stupid "global warming" issue.
Very informative video! Thanks for breaking it down stoichiometricly. This leaves me wondering what the rate of loss of Chlorine in the upper atmosphere is due to solar winds…
The answer is essentially 'because of the weather in the ozone layer'. In order for rapid ozone destruction to happen, clouds (known as PSCs, Stratospheric Clouds Mother of Pearl or Nacreous Clouds) have to form in the ozone layer. In these clouds surface chemistry takes place. This converts chlorine or bromine (from CFCs and other ozone depleting chemicals) into an active form, so that when there is sunlight, ozone is rapidly destroyed. Without the clouds, there is little or no ozone destruction. Only during the Antarctic winter does the atmosphere get cold enough for these clouds to form widely through the centre of the ozone layer. Elsewhere the atmosphere is just too warm and no clouds form. The northern and southern hemispheres have different 'weather' in the ozone layer, and the net result is that the temperature of the Arctic ozone layer during winter is normally some ten degrees warmer than that of the Antarctic. This means that such clouds are rare, but sometimes the 'weather' is colder than normal and they do form. Under these circumstances significant ozone depletion can take place over the Arctic, but it is usually for a much shorter period of time and covers a smaller area than in the Antarctic. www.theozonehole.com/askthescientist.htm
Well done. It was by chance that I stumbled upon one of your distillation videos while studying for an Organic I lab final a while ago, glad I did. I enjoy your content and presentation styles.
@@hanzellmo Your thoughts? The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion "Holes" in the ozone argument: 1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)? 2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ? 3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...") 4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?) 5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds? 6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place. I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths. The Ozone Scam ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+ Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone: ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud: Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?). ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html 1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda. Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers. ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?: ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html A discussion of atmospheric chlorine: api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel) "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used. Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it. ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning. ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html Lousy car air conditioning: ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html . Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
You mentioned we need to get the chlorine out of the atmosphere to restore the equilibrium. How do we do this? I understand lower chlorine emissions to stop it from getting worse, but does the chlorine just go away? Where can the chlorine that is already up there go?
making a molecule out of different atoms occur when the 2 or more share electrons to get the to a stability they have no interest in moving. So O3 is comfy in that alignment, no need to change.
This always confused me. How do the comparatively heavy cfs “reach the upper atmosphere”, (the stratosphere)? How does it then reach the poles where we see lower ozone concentrations? Ozone is naturally formed when the suns light hits oxygen in the stratosphere. And we get the lowest concentration of sunlight at the poles. Would we not therefore expect to find this anyway?
I get this question a lot. Here is my answer: the problem is with the description of "heavy". Yes, their molecular mass is large, but that would imply that gravity is a factor once they are mixed with other gasses. It isn't. Once dispersed into the atmosphere, their mass is practically meaningless (think ideal gas law - show me the term for mass in the ideal gas law). Once they are dispersed, air currents in the atmosphere carry them aloft and spread them out. Think of it this way. Put sugar in a glass of water. Sugar is WAY more dense than water, so it settles to the bottom. Let the solution sit idle for hours... not much happens - still sugar sitting under water. Now, agitate the mixture. The sugar becomes integrated and dispersed (i.e. dissolved) within the water. But sugar is more dense... surely it will settle out over time? Go ahead and wait. It won't happen. Similarly, once these gasses are mixed into the atmosphere they are essentially part of the atmospheric "solution" forever (or until they react/decompose). Where the air goes, they go, and that includes the upper atmosphere.
Thanks for the question. There is a lot of chemistry going on the upper atmosphere and this video just scratches the surface. The chlorine radicals eventually encounter another radical of some kind (chlorine or some other naturally occurring radical) and are consumed in reactions in which they are not catalytic. The oxygen radicals shown at 4:49 are there as a consequence of the natural equilibrium between ozone , diatomic oxygen and atomic oxygen species in the upper atmosphere (discussed earlier in the video).
the combinations of UV rays and Oxygen produce O3, as long as you have these two things present you will have Ozone. That's why there's a "hole" detected in the south pole or in the north pole depending on the time of year because the sunlight is limited in these areas. That's why there's no 'hole' in the ozone "layer" over LA!
yeah it was a massive scam. How did a heavy gas like CFC go up to the stratosphere. And we make it in such small quantities. It's like saying your piss can destroy the ocean.
Long to explain. First, ozone is mainly produced in the tropics and transported towards the poles (Brewer Doson circulation). In a normal situation, ozone concentration is even higher over the poles because the lifetime of ozone is longer where there is less sun. The ozone hole occurs over the poles (mainly south pole) because a complex chemistry transforms chlorine reservoir molecules into active ones during the winter. The hole forms in spring when light transforms the active chlorine molecules into chlorine atoms that destroy readily ozone through catalytic reactions. The phenomenom occurs only over the poles and only during spring. At higher latitudes, a decrease of the ozone layer was observed, about 5% since the 1970's. This global depletion is due to the release of CFCs and other halogen molecules mainly of industrial origin and to increased emissions of methane (fossil fuel combustion) and of nitrgen protoxyde (from fertilizers). In conclusion, ozone in the ozone layer is not only a question of light but also of more complex processes that destroy ozone differently, depending on the season and the place where you are.@@silasbullard831
Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p! The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion "Holes" in the ozone argument: 1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)? 2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ? 3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...") 4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?) 5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds? 6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place. I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths. The Ozone Scam ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+ Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone: ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud: Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?). ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html 1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda. Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers. ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?: ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html A discussion of atmospheric chlorine: api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel) "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used. Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it. ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning. ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html Lousy car air conditioning: ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html Propane as a refregerant ruclips.net/video/iXyHOfx307k/видео.html . Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right) ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?) Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry. You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..." ruclips.net/video/krqHVzF3-T8/видео.html
When freon molecules are released into the atmosphere and the sun breaks them down, is it only chlorine that reacts with diatomic oxygen molecules? And if that is why? Also, in this example that you gave for Freon 12 , there are 2 Chlorine atoms in Freon 12 so are both of the chlorine atoms released? Or just one of them?
Yeah only the chlorine because it becomes a free radical where it needs an electron to complete the octet rule. It then snatches electron from the O in ozone. The other molecules are fine since they already completed the octet rule.
Great question. Let me preface my response by stating that it is complete speculation. Having said that.... here we go.... A quick search of bond enthalpies shows that vinyl chloride C-Cl bonds have an ever-so-slightly higher bond dissociation energy than methyl chloride, so I doubt that it has much to do with the relative strength of the C-Cl bond itself in these compounds. It is, however, worth noting that vinyl radicals are TERRIBLY unstable, even compared to alkyl radicals. For a haloalkene to generate a chlorine radical, it must also generate a vinyl radical, which is highly disfavored energetically. This might lead one to predict that the necessary homolytic bond dissociation does not happen as readily in the few haloalkenes that manage to reach the upper atmosphere.
Thank you for the response. The speculation is very sounding. But do you mean that the C-Cl bond in the above compounds maybe too strong for even UV radiation to break? (Perhaps because of more s character in sp2 hybrid orbital?) I can hardly find articles or mere information on haloalkene. Just want to know whether they are simply omitted or they are considered but classified as non-ozone depleting substance.
how a single chlorine atom and a single oxygen atom combine to form a ClO? is not chlorine monoxide Cl2O? is it because all of the earlier 3 are unstable? the atomic chlorine, atomic oxygen and the atomic level ClO?
Cannot agree with you more, I think the most disturbing things is, why is this in any text book as fact, there are far higher chlorine release in nature, example sea water evaporation etc. CFC production is a fraction of what nature does on a daily basis.
@@TheCriticSage This is incredible. The sheer stupidity of "ozone depletion" makes "global warming" look mild. You should see what a hellish mess this ozone cr*p is doing to the Air Conditioning business.
@@hg2. Undoubtedly, man made stuff is putting more strain on the environment, yet the panic that is advertised to the masses about global warming and ozone layers and those type of things, is really based on pure economics. People make more money from these devastating earth ending stuff that is based on guesswork and Ph. D. people that calls it science.
+Marco A.G.J. In situations like this, the radical catalyst eventually reacts with another radical in the termination step (sometimes other catalyst radicals themselves). It is a natural process that takes place over time, so there is not need to actively 'purge out' the catalyst.
@@ulkairvillan3219 I don't see any Dupont fingerprints, but maybe that's true. I blame the the stupid media and the public for falling for it. If we're fooled that easily, "we deserve to get screwed". The same thing is happening with global warming (right?).
Are there any possible methods to prevent chlorine atoms in the stratosphere to bond with ozone? Is it possible to make the chlorine atom bond with another atom?
Our atmosphere is made up of 78% of nitrogen. Nitrogen has an atomic mass of 14. Chlorofluorocarbons have elements that are much heavier in comparison, such as chlorine which has an atomic mass of 35. That being said, the buoyant force of chlorofluorocarbons would not cause it to rise. In fact, it would sink. What am I missing????
@@lesliehorne846 If so, then why is chlorine from pools allowed? Following the same logic, you would need to ban the 1,000,000 swimming pools that are using chlorine for their pool.
It is not actually the buoyancy that makes it rise up but the interaction of the cfc molecules with the atmospheric molecules. The attractive forces of atoms causes the molecules to drift upward in the air causing them to act like a sticky ladder.
@@erichorton1440the chlorine in pools bonds with the water molecules and completes the octet rule. However, in the cfc molecule in the atmosphere, as it is broken by the uv, a free Cl radical is produced which is bad as it undergoes a process of halogenation and steals Oxygen from ozone just to complete the octet rule.
Great illustration,, thans for explaining so clearly for mostly people like myself who are not in the chemistry filed,, I am studying using CFC in mechanical ventilation and HVAC to generate cold environments for building occupants,, this video encouraged me not to go with refrigerators using CFCs and search for a better solution.
Aren't you wonderful. The sheer stupidity of "ozone depletion" makes "global warming" look mild. You should see what a hellish mess this ozone cr*p is doing to the Air Conditioning business.
Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p! The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion "Holes" in the ozone argument: 1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)? 2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ? 3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...") 4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?) 5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds? 6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place. I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths. The Ozone Scam ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+ Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone: ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud: Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?). ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html 1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda. Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers. ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?: ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html A discussion of atmospheric chlorine: api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel) "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used. Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it. ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning. ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html Lousy car air conditioning: ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html Propane as a refregerant ruclips.net/video/iXyHOfx307k/видео.html . Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right) ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?) Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry. You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..." ruclips.net/video/krqHVzF3-T8/видео.html
Everything that this video explained is true and scientifically accurate, and I commend it for that. What this video does not mention, however, is that the depletion due to CFC's has been estimated to be about 5% of the total layer. To put this in perspective, the natural fluctuations of the Ozone in the atmosphere can reach depletion levels of approximately 50%. In other words, the depletion of Ozone due to natural fluctuations is about ten times greater than that caused by CFC's. Another point that the video failed to mention is the fact that CFC's are only able to cause harm to the Ozone layer at the poles, and are highly unlikely to spread anywhere else in the atmosphere. One final point the video fails to mention is the fact the there is not a single illness or death that has been traced to the depletion of the Ozone layer due to CFC's. These points all make it evident how absurd the levels to which the harms of CFC's have been emphasized truly are.
Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p! The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion "Holes" in the ozone argument: 1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)? 2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ? 3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...") 4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?) 5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds? 6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place. I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths. The Ozone Scam ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+ Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone: ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud: Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?). ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html 1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda. Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers. ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?: ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html A discussion of atmospheric chlorine: api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel) "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used. Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it. ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning. ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html Lousy car air conditioning: ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html Propane as a refregerant ruclips.net/video/iXyHOfx307k/видео.html . Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right) ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?) Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry. You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..." ruclips.net/video/krqHVzF3-T8/видео.html
Got air conditioning? Howowner figures out something's wrong with the AC business. Refrigerant coolants comparison discussion  Refrigerant coolants comparison discussion Join Paul for a talk about modern AC refrigerants. Hydrocarbon (HC) refrigerant coolants, including HC-12A Durac... Old window air conditioner with R22 Freon was COLDER than new AC with R32 or R410A  Old window air conditioner with R22 Freon was COLDER than new AC with R32 o... My old Freon-cooled window air conditioner cooled better and was colder than new AC with ozone and global warmin... Bonus: Don't Buy Cars that Use this New Type of Refrigerant in the AC System  Don't Buy Cars that Use this New Type of Refrigerant in the AC System Car AC system refrigerant. Don't Buy Cars that Use this New Type of Refrigerant in the AC System, DIY with S... Play this at 2x speed and it sounds like a Monty Python sketch: R421a, R422d, R422b and More! (4 19 16)  R421a, R422d, R422b and More! (4 19 16) The quack-science this fiasco is based on: The Ozone Scam  The Ozone Scam At the top of a warm dry cycle, you get scams and fraud. The current man-made global warming scam is one of them... Naked Science - Super Volcanoes  Naked Science - Super Volcanoes Subscribe to Naked Science - goo.gl/wpc2Q1 Every other Wednesday we present a new video, so join us to se...
This is correct. Seasonal changes in size are natural. However, trends of increase in the seasonal maximum over decades of time are not natural. It is the decades-long trend of increasing seasonal maximum that is correlated to CFC release. Imagine opening and closing the curtains on a window over and over by exactly the same distance. The size of the opening changes on the SHORT term (during each cycle), but on the LONG term (over many cycles) you quickly reach an equilibrium in which the opening has a static average size per cycle. i.e. the same amount of light per cycle gets through the window. Now imagine that each time you do so, you open the curtains a little more, and close them a little less. The longer-term trend is that the opening is growing and more light is getting through the window in each successive cycle. This is the problem the CFC production and release caused with the ozone layer in the 80s and 90s. The hole still varied in size seasonally, but just about every year during that period, overall it was a little bit larger than the last.
i am 66 , it seems to me sometimes that the sunlight was sort of smoother 50 years ago . maybe the decomposing wwII sarin gas bombs in the oceans are contributing to this phänomen , as well as lack of green zones . inhale less and exhale a little more than you inhale will eventually prevent toxins to accumulate in your body , and keep on moving regularly .
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion "Holes" in the ozone argument: 1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)? 2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ? 3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...") 4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?) 5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds? 6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place. I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths. The Ozone Scam ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+ Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone: ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud: Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?). ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html 1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda. Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers. ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?: ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html A discussion of atmospheric chlorine: api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel) "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins." chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/ Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used. Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it. ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning. ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html Lousy car air conditioning: ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html . Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
C'MON, SCISHOW, YOU KNOW THE PLURAL OF LETTERS THAT ARE ABBREVIATIONS, LIKE CFC, IS CFCs. don't promote the "grocer's apostrophe", ie 'when in doubt add an apostrophe. our language skills depreciate every day and we don't want to inspire those who obviously flunked 2nd grade english. if your grandchildren do pay attention in class they will be able to thank you - in English.
This does not make sense. There are no CFCs in northern and southern poles. CFCs are heavy gas. It does not rise easily. You are making short cuts from CFC to Cl.
This is mostly BS. The real reason they made such a stink about CFCs is because the patents had run out and everyone was making them which drove the price down. They couldn’t make money any more so they banned them and started using different refrigerants that were patented.
Well this is what I gathered. You are using government data. They only show "holes" in the ozone above the poles and it's always during the winter. The sun doesn't shine there during that time of year. When sunlight hits oxygen it separates into ozone which is a free radical always trying to reattach. When there isn't enough sunlight to form new ozone then we see the holes..it has been happening since the beginning of time. It isn't man that is causing the holes. It is just nature working the way it is meant to be. Go back and look at the south pole during the summer time and you wont see the hole.
I'm not really using anyone's data, just an image from NASA (if you want to call that data, then I won't challenge that), and I definitely am not out to jump on any particular environmentalism bandwagons. Just trying to show the reaction between halogen atoms and ozone. It's a chemistry thing. But since you brought it up... To your point, I don't think anyone disputes that the ozone hole moves and changes in size seasonally, but the overriding trend in recent decades has been that at its largest point in any given year, it has been progressively larger and larger. Your point has to do with seasonal trends, mine has to do with annual and decade-long trends. That would be a bit like comparing apples and oranges. For example: www.environment.gov.au/node/22194 This 25 year pattern of increasing maximum seasonal size is the trend that most scientists point to as a very likely result of the halogen atoms building up in the region from CFC's Thanks for the comment.
I would suggest that you may want to find a good chemistry teacher. Take a few courses in physics as well. The two are inextricably linked. It's certainly not easy. You may have to watch the lectures 10 times. All of a sudden, "eureka", difficult concepts suddenly become clear, and as natural as a walk in the park. That's how to have a realistic picture of phenomena like Ozone Depletion, or Global warming, ("two separate issues"), but they have things in common in terms of complexity, solar radiation, and the absorption of that radiation in it's different frequencies. I suggest (FREE) on line courses, from (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) under (MIT Open Courseware / Video Lectures), with PDF files for course materials if you really want to test yourself. They even offer certificates of completion. When the first sentence you use contains the words, (government data) it gives the impression that (government data) is somehow more, or less dependable than (private data) a very amateurish assessment of the quality of data. The collection, use, testing, and retesting of data and experimentation will show flaws in the data, not an automatic Knee jerk reaction. It gives the impression that your a neophyte, applying right wing anti government mentality to the issue, or applying some sort of anti science religious bias, which destroys your credibility in terms of serious understanding of scientific matters. I could be wrong, but my instincts and experience tell me to be wary of those who use that terminology. Stop listening to idiots on TV (Loose News), and your crazy uncle. Get the facts, and set yourself "free". The courses are fun anyway, you'll see. Better than hangin out at the pool hall.
Peter Mullen Government data is almost always less dependable than private data. At least that's what I think. The government always has agendas. The problem is most people aren't aware of their agendas or they believe that the government is here to help us. They do things like take temp readings in a parking lot in the middle of a city just to get a high reading. I was wrong in my approach, Chem Survival was just explaining a process and I was having a hard typing my comment..I believe I started on it one day and finished the next because I kept getting interrupted. I'll check out the courses you mentioned and thanks for the info.
TheMddddd I appreciate both view points. And I don't necessarily see much of a difference there. The truth that we would so love to overlook in most cases is this: that research is very rarely altruistically motivated. Public or private: someone is paying the bills, and that financier is usually directly (and almost always indirectly) applying pressure to the project to arrive at findings aligned with that financier's interests. The trick is to learn to view results through a filter of healthy skepticism. The key there is the word 'healthy'. To single out government researchers I think is the only mistake that TheMddddd made. Rigorous, healthy debate is always welcomed among scientists, but prejudiced attitude-driven commentary is very often met with a powerful push back in the scientific community. To reiterate my original point. The video is a short attempt to introduce the uninitiated to the reaction mechanisms which most closely explain exactly why the average annual ozone hole size increased over that famous span of time during which CFC's were in wide-spread use. I do not claim to know for a fact that it is the only player, or even the major player, but I can say with certainty as a PhD Chemist and University Professor, the hypothesis has tremendous merit and curtailment of CFC use was definitely the right thing to do. As the years go by and we observe the hole's behavior as the atomic chlorine in the upper atmosphere is naturally cleared, we will come even closer to knowing if it really was the cause!
TheMddddd It worked. That's all I know. I made some and gave it to someone with breast cancer. They were told last Friday that the tumors were no longer visible on the MRI.. the doctor told her not to have the previously recommended mastectomy... It's amazing what one can find on youtube.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
That was very informative. I didn't think I would get so much from a 5 minute video.
Thank you Prof. Davis!!
Very to the point and relevant. This wasnt taught to me in basic chemistry.
This is the best most accurate explanation I have found, well done and thank you for doing your part in improving the zeitgeist !
I am a graduate and after several years studying about ozone depletion this is for the first time it stuck to my head..thanks a lot ☺
Very nicely explained and u gone through point to point.....
Freon the source of chlorine is three times heavier than oxygen. How does it make its way to the upper atmosphere?
hurricanes, tornados
Bravo!
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
"Holes" in the ozone argument:
1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)?
2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ?
3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...")
4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?)
5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds?
6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place.
I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths.
The Ozone Scam
ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+
Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam:
In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone:
ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html
In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud:
Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?).
ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html
1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda.
Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers.
ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html
Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?:
ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html
A discussion of atmospheric chlorine:
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution
Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel)
"Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins."
chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/
Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used.
Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it.
ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html
How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning.
ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html
Lousy car air conditioning:
ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html
Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant
ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html
.
Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm
Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine...
ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
hg2 I’m an hvac contractor and had to get my EPA card and while I was reading the book about how CFCs were destroying the ozone we are going to replace them with hydrofluorocarbons I thought well that’s a good idea but wouldn’t pools and the chlorine that they put off into the atmosphere be just as bad if not worse than CFCs if what they are saying is true?
@@peterdarlington4117
Right.
The EPA instructor in the last video says "... this isn't the chlorine you put in pools..."
In other words there's two kinds of chlorine?
Meanwhile, there's old ladies in Florida on fixed incomes who are getting told, "If you want AC you have to cough up $5000 to replace that R22 system you've got."
And R22 wasn't even banned for ozone depletion by the stupid Montreal Protocol. It was for the stupid "global warming" issue.
hg2 pool “chlorine” isn’t pure chlorine molecules, they are compounds containing chlorine that have different physical properties
Thanks for making my concept crystal clear . Jai Hind Jai Bharat
Very informative video! Thanks for breaking it down stoichiometricly.
This leaves me wondering what the rate of loss of Chlorine in the upper atmosphere is due to solar winds…
Thanks sir❤
Why do CFC's only deplete ozone at the south pole?
The answer is essentially 'because of the weather in the ozone layer'. In order for rapid ozone destruction to happen, clouds (known as PSCs, Stratospheric Clouds Mother of Pearl or Nacreous Clouds) have to form in the ozone layer. In these clouds surface chemistry takes place. This converts chlorine or bromine (from CFCs and other ozone depleting chemicals) into an active form, so that when there is sunlight, ozone is rapidly destroyed. Without the clouds, there is little or no ozone destruction. Only during the Antarctic winter does the atmosphere get cold enough for these clouds to form widely through the centre of the ozone layer. Elsewhere the atmosphere is just too warm and no clouds form. The northern and southern hemispheres have different 'weather' in the ozone layer, and the net result is that the temperature of the Arctic ozone layer during winter is normally some ten degrees warmer than that of the Antarctic. This means that such clouds are rare, but sometimes the 'weather' is colder than normal and they do form. Under these circumstances significant ozone depletion can take place over the Arctic, but it is usually for a much shorter period of time and covers a smaller area than in the Antarctic.
www.theozonehole.com/askthescientist.htm
how could you? CFC's means ONE THING, THAT CFC OWNS SOMETHING! NOT HOW PLURALS ARE DONE IN ENGLISH!
@@mikearcher9390 chill. from one grammar cop to another: we are losing the battle. :-(
Well done. It was by chance that I stumbled upon one of your distillation videos while studying for an Organic I lab final a while ago, glad I did. I enjoy your content and presentation styles.
Thanks! Please remember t subscribe and pass the channel on to your classmates!
Does the fact that there is 6 months of darkness at the south pole contribute to lack of ozone there?
no
yes, the rxn for ozone is favored by light, so at the same time there's less ozone "regenerating"
@@hanzellmo
rxn?
@@hanzellmo
Your thoughts?
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
"Holes" in the ozone argument:
1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)?
2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ?
3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...")
4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?)
5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds?
6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place.
I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths.
The Ozone Scam
ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+
Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam:
In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone:
ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html
In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud:
Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?).
ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html
1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda.
Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers.
ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html
Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?:
ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html
A discussion of atmospheric chlorine:
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution
Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel)
"Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins."
chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/
Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used.
Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it.
ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html
How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning.
ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html
Lousy car air conditioning:
ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html
Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant
ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html
.
Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm
Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine...
ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
@@hg2. You need to stop (mis)using RUclips.
You mentioned we need to get the chlorine out of the atmosphere to restore the equilibrium. How do we do this? I understand lower chlorine emissions to stop it from getting worse, but does the chlorine just go away? Where can the chlorine that is already up there go?
A single chlorine atom will continue to deplete many ozone molecules dozens of times until it cannot anymore and is destroyed.
maybe by dispersing atoms that will bond with chlorine to become stable but won't bond with oxygen.
Nice presentation Prof. thank you
You say it goes back to equilibrium but don't state how. If you have a load of O2 how does O2 turn back to O and O3 if theres so much more O2?
making a molecule out of different atoms occur when the 2 or more share electrons to get the to a stability they have no interest in moving. So O3 is comfy in that alignment, no need to change.
This always confused me. How do the comparatively heavy cfs “reach the upper atmosphere”, (the stratosphere)? How does it then reach the poles where we see lower ozone concentrations? Ozone is naturally formed when the suns light hits oxygen in the stratosphere. And we get the lowest concentration of sunlight at the poles. Would we not therefore expect to find this anyway?
I get this question a lot. Here is my answer: the problem is with the description of "heavy". Yes, their molecular mass is large, but that would imply that gravity is a factor once they are mixed with other gasses. It isn't. Once dispersed into the atmosphere, their mass is practically meaningless (think ideal gas law - show me the term for mass in the ideal gas law). Once they are dispersed, air currents in the atmosphere carry them aloft and spread them out.
Think of it this way. Put sugar in a glass of water. Sugar is WAY more dense than water, so it settles to the bottom. Let the solution sit idle for hours... not much happens - still sugar sitting under water. Now, agitate the mixture. The sugar becomes integrated and dispersed (i.e. dissolved) within the water. But sugar is more dense... surely it will settle out over time? Go ahead and wait. It won't happen. Similarly, once these gasses are mixed into the atmosphere they are essentially part of the atmospheric "solution" forever (or until they react/decompose). Where the air goes, they go, and that includes the upper atmosphere.
Why does the Cl atom stop after 10's or 100's of thousands of interactions?
4:49 You're showing single oxygen atoms as just sitting around up there?
Thanks for the question. There is a lot of chemistry going on the upper atmosphere and this video just scratches the surface.
The chlorine radicals eventually encounter another radical of some kind (chlorine or some other naturally occurring radical) and are consumed in reactions in which they are not catalytic.
The oxygen radicals shown at 4:49 are there as a consequence of the natural equilibrium between ozone , diatomic oxygen and atomic oxygen species in the upper atmosphere (discussed earlier in the video).
Nicely Explained. Thanks!
Very lucid! Thanks :)
the combinations of UV rays and Oxygen produce O3, as long as you have these two things present you will have Ozone. That's why there's a "hole" detected in the south pole or in the north pole depending on the time of year because the sunlight is limited in these areas. That's why there's no 'hole' in the ozone "layer" over LA!
yeah it was a massive scam. How did a heavy gas like CFC go up to the stratosphere. And we make it in such small quantities. It's like saying your piss can destroy the ocean.
Absolutely wrong !
@@stephh7034 how?
Long to explain. First, ozone is mainly produced in the tropics and transported towards the poles (Brewer Doson circulation). In a normal situation, ozone concentration is even higher over the poles because the lifetime of ozone is longer where there is less sun. The ozone hole occurs over the poles (mainly south pole) because a complex chemistry transforms chlorine reservoir molecules into active ones during the winter. The hole forms in spring when light transforms the active chlorine molecules into chlorine atoms that destroy readily ozone through catalytic reactions. The phenomenom occurs only over the poles and only during spring. At higher latitudes, a decrease of the ozone layer was observed, about 5% since the 1970's. This global depletion is due to the release of CFCs and other halogen molecules mainly of industrial origin and to increased emissions of methane (fossil fuel combustion) and of nitrgen protoxyde (from fertilizers). In conclusion, ozone in the ozone layer is not only a question of light but also of more complex processes that destroy ozone differently, depending on the season and the place where you are.@@silasbullard831
@@stephh7034 how is ozone produced in the tropics?
Thank you professor.... it was the best
este video en español lo tendran?
Very good animation representation brother please keep on making good content from time to time
Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p!
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
"Holes" in the ozone argument:
1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)?
2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ?
3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...")
4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?)
5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds?
6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place.
I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths.
The Ozone Scam
ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+
Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam:
In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone:
ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html
In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud:
Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?).
ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html
1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda.
Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers.
ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html
Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?:
ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html
A discussion of atmospheric chlorine:
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution
Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel)
"Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins."
chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/
Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used.
Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it.
ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html
How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning.
ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html
Lousy car air conditioning:
ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html
Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant
ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html
Propane as a refregerant
ruclips.net/video/iXyHOfx307k/видео.html
.
Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm
Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right)
ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?)
Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry.
You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..."
ruclips.net/video/krqHVzF3-T8/видео.html
Thanks for this video!
When freon molecules are released into the atmosphere and the sun breaks them down, is it only chlorine that reacts with diatomic oxygen molecules? And if that is why? Also, in this example that you gave for Freon 12 , there are 2 Chlorine atoms in Freon 12 so are both of the chlorine atoms released? Or just one of them?
freon molecules does not reach the south poles. there is a hole in the south and north because solar radiation makes O3.
Yeah only the chlorine because it becomes a free radical where it needs an electron to complete the octet rule. It then snatches electron from the O in ozone.
The other molecules are fine since they already completed the octet rule.
Thank you sir
Ozone layer is recovering
Can haloalkenes e.g. C2F2Cl2, C2F3Cl deplete the ozone layer as well? If they can, why aren't they regulated in the Montreal Protocol?
Great question. Let me preface my response by stating that it is complete speculation. Having said that.... here we go....
A quick search of bond enthalpies shows that vinyl chloride C-Cl bonds have an ever-so-slightly higher bond dissociation energy than methyl chloride, so I doubt that it has much to do with the relative strength of the C-Cl bond itself in these compounds.
It is, however, worth noting that vinyl radicals are TERRIBLY unstable, even compared to alkyl radicals. For a haloalkene to generate a chlorine radical, it must also generate a vinyl radical, which is highly disfavored energetically. This might lead one to predict that the necessary homolytic bond dissociation does not happen as readily in the few haloalkenes that manage to reach the upper atmosphere.
Thank you for the response. The speculation is very sounding. But do you mean that the C-Cl bond in the above compounds maybe too strong for even UV radiation to break? (Perhaps because of more s character in sp2 hybrid orbital?) I can hardly find articles or mere information on haloalkene. Just want to know whether they are simply omitted or they are considered but classified as non-ozone depleting substance.
Well explained. Thank you so much🙂
how a single chlorine atom and a single oxygen atom combine to form a ClO? is not chlorine monoxide Cl2O? is it because all of the earlier 3 are unstable? the atomic chlorine, atomic oxygen and the atomic level ClO?
nicely expained
u saved my homework
What is free radical?
A molecule with odd number of valence electron which is unstable and needs to complete the octet rule
Wait... Catalysts doesn't change the chemical equilibrium
Whats the difference between hcfc and cfc?
Tristan Burns one has hydrogen the other doesnt...
Why doesn't Clorox, pool chlorine, or chlorine from seawater (NaCl "salt water) deplete ozone?
Cannot agree with you more, I think the most disturbing things is, why is this in any text book as fact, there are far higher chlorine release in nature, example sea water evaporation etc. CFC production is a fraction of what nature does on a daily basis.
@@TheCriticSage
This is incredible. The sheer stupidity of "ozone depletion" makes "global warming" look mild.
You should see what a hellish mess this ozone cr*p is doing to the Air Conditioning business.
@@hg2. Undoubtedly, man made stuff is putting more strain on the environment, yet the panic that is advertised to the masses about global warming and ozone layers and those type of things, is really based on pure economics. People make more money from these devastating earth ending stuff that is based on guesswork and Ph. D. people that calls it science.
@@TheCriticSage
PhD - Piled Higher and Deeper
@@hg2. LOL
How exactly do you purge Cl atoms out?
+Marco A.G.J. In situations like this, the radical catalyst eventually reacts with another radical in the termination step (sometimes other catalyst radicals themselves). It is a natural process that takes place over time, so there is not need to actively 'purge out' the catalyst.
If the ozone hole was "discovered" in the late 70s with satellite imagery, how do we know it wasn't there all along?
ruclips.net/video/5O3vkGGmt8c/видео.html
Its all hoax
Yup it was a massive hoax by DuPont to ban Freon gas before the patent ran out and force people to buy their new replacement.
@@ulkairvillan3219
I don't see any Dupont fingerprints, but maybe that's true.
I blame the the stupid media and the public for falling for it. If we're fooled that easily, "we deserve to get screwed".
The same thing is happening with global warming (right?).
Are there any possible methods to prevent chlorine atoms in the stratosphere to bond with ozone?
Is it possible to make the chlorine atom bond with another atom?
Free F is absolutely rare. CFC has more density than air. At -80ºC it's impossible
Who is Professor Davis and what are his credentials? He's done a wonderful job animating what he says is happening, but I'm not convinced.
gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/contact/00336000014RaSqAAK/ronald-davis
why cant O3 + O be O + O + O2
thank you
Our atmosphere is made up of 78% of nitrogen. Nitrogen has an atomic mass of 14. Chlorofluorocarbons have elements that are much heavier in comparison, such as chlorine which has an atomic mass of 35. That being said, the buoyant force of chlorofluorocarbons would not cause it to rise. In fact, it would sink. What am I missing????
My guess would be the strength of the global wind/air circulation and rising air from low pressure areas
@@lesliehorne846 If so, then why is chlorine from pools allowed? Following the same logic, you would need to ban the 1,000,000 swimming pools that are using chlorine for their pool.
It is not actually the buoyancy that makes it rise up but the interaction of the cfc molecules with the atmospheric molecules. The attractive forces of atoms causes the molecules to drift upward in the air causing them to act like a sticky ladder.
@@erichorton1440the chlorine in pools bonds with the water molecules and completes the octet rule. However, in the cfc molecule in the atmosphere, as it is broken by the uv, a free Cl radical is produced which is bad as it undergoes a process of halogenation and steals Oxygen from ozone just to complete the octet rule.
Great illustration,, thans for explaining so clearly for mostly people like myself who are not in the chemistry filed,, I am studying using CFC in mechanical ventilation and HVAC to generate cold environments for building occupants,, this video encouraged me not to go with refrigerators using CFCs and search for a better solution.
Aren't you wonderful.
The sheer stupidity of "ozone depletion" makes "global warming" look mild.
You should see what a hellish mess this ozone cr*p is doing to the Air Conditioning business.
thanks for using the correct plural, CFCs. I cringe everytime I see 'CFC's' or 'BUS'S'
I thought they were banned from use
not everyone follows the Montreal protocol
Life changing! Thank you :)
Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p!
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
"Holes" in the ozone argument:
1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)?
2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ?
3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...")
4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?)
5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds?
6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place.
I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths.
The Ozone Scam
ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+
Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam:
In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone:
ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html
In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud:
Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?).
ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html
1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda.
Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers.
ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html
Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?:
ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html
A discussion of atmospheric chlorine:
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution
Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel)
"Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins."
chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/
Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used.
Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it.
ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html
How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning.
ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html
Lousy car air conditioning:
ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html
Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant
ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html
Propane as a refregerant
ruclips.net/video/iXyHOfx307k/видео.html
.
Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm
Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right)
ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?)
Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry.
You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..."
ruclips.net/video/krqHVzF3-T8/видео.html
You are a nerd, that's why i like you
"CHLOROFLUROCARBONS" Say that 100 times fast!
Everything that this video explained is true and scientifically accurate, and I commend it for that. What this video does not mention, however, is that the depletion due to CFC's has been estimated to be about 5% of the total layer. To put this in perspective, the natural fluctuations of the Ozone in the atmosphere can reach depletion levels of approximately 50%. In other words, the depletion of Ozone due to natural fluctuations is about ten times greater than that caused by CFC's. Another point that the video failed to mention is the fact that CFC's are only able to cause harm to the Ozone layer at the poles, and are highly unlikely to spread anywhere else in the atmosphere. One final point the video fails to mention is the fact the there is not a single illness or death that has been traced to the depletion of the Ozone layer due to CFC's. These points all make it evident how absurd the levels to which the harms of CFC's have been emphasized truly are.
plural of CFC IS CFCs, save the apostrophe for 'ownership'!
I was taught Catalysts don't take part in reaction. Seems like they do
Catalyst do indeed participate in reactions, they simply aren't consumed because they are produced as byproducts on the back end of the reaction
@@ChemSurvival Thanks!!
It's actually UVC but more so UVB
nice
helpful and useful
thx
My teacher explain about cfcs & ozone layers
Me: dont get a single thing
RUclips Video explain about cfcs & ozone layers
Me: Interesting 🤔
Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p!
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
"Holes" in the ozone argument:
1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)?
2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ?
3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...")
4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?)
5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds?
6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place.
I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths.
The Ozone Scam
ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+
Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam:
In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone:
ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html
In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud:
Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?).
ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html
1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda.
Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers.
ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html
Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?:
ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html
A discussion of atmospheric chlorine:
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution
Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel)
"Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins."
chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/
Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used.
Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it.
ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html
How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning.
ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html
Lousy car air conditioning:
ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html
Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant
ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html
Propane as a refregerant
ruclips.net/video/iXyHOfx307k/видео.html
.
Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm
Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right)
ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?)
Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry.
You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..."
ruclips.net/video/krqHVzF3-T8/видео.html
purfect
Idk if I ever will get a response how the fuck do I explain to someone the dangers of CFC's when all they want to do is deny?
HAHAHAHA, he said a "Monkey Rench!", a-hahaha, ..... haha,,,,.............AHAHAHAHAHASHA
to the point
Aweosme
best aha moment
Got air conditioning?
Howowner figures out something's wrong with the AC business.
Refrigerant coolants comparison discussion

Refrigerant coolants comparison discussion
Join Paul for a talk about modern AC refrigerants. Hydrocarbon (HC) refrigerant coolants, including HC-12A Durac...
Old window air conditioner with R22 Freon was COLDER than new AC with R32 or R410A

Old window air conditioner with R22 Freon was COLDER than new AC with R32 o...
My old Freon-cooled window air conditioner cooled better and was colder than new AC with ozone and global warmin...
Bonus:
Don't Buy Cars that Use this New Type of Refrigerant in the AC System

Don't Buy Cars that Use this New Type of Refrigerant in the AC System
Car AC system refrigerant. Don't Buy Cars that Use this New Type of Refrigerant in the AC System, DIY with S...
Play this at 2x speed and it sounds like a Monty Python sketch:
R421a, R422d, R422b and More! (4 19 16)

R421a, R422d, R422b and More! (4 19 16)
The quack-science this fiasco is based on:
The Ozone Scam

The Ozone Scam
At the top of a warm dry cycle, you get scams and fraud. The current man-made global warming scam is one of them...
Naked Science - Super Volcanoes

Naked Science - Super Volcanoes
Subscribe to Naked Science - goo.gl/wpc2Q1 Every other Wednesday we present a new video, so join us to se...
The ozone layer changes size seasonally. It has nothing to do with CFCs!
This is correct. Seasonal changes in size are natural. However, trends of increase in the seasonal maximum over decades of time are not natural. It is the decades-long trend of increasing seasonal maximum that is correlated to CFC release.
Imagine opening and closing the curtains on a window over and over by exactly the same distance. The size of the opening changes on the SHORT term (during each cycle), but on the LONG term (over many cycles) you quickly reach an equilibrium in which the opening has a static average size per cycle. i.e. the same amount of light per cycle gets through the window.
Now imagine that each time you do so, you open the curtains a little more, and close them a little less. The longer-term trend is that the opening is growing and more light is getting through the window in each successive cycle. This is the problem the CFC production and release caused with the ozone layer in the 80s and 90s. The hole still varied in size seasonally, but just about every year during that period, overall it was a little bit larger than the last.
Thanks for 'CFCs' and not the moronic CFC's
i am 66 , it seems to me sometimes that the sunlight was sort of smoother 50 years ago . maybe the decomposing wwII sarin gas bombs in the oceans are contributing to this phänomen , as well as lack of green zones . inhale less and exhale a little more than you inhale will eventually prevent toxins to accumulate in your body , and keep on moving regularly .
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
"Holes" in the ozone argument:
1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)?
2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ?
3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...")
4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?)
5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds?
6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place.
I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths.
The Ozone Scam
ruclips.net/video/9Szs-treHwQ/видео.html
The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+
Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam:
In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone:
ruclips.net/video/lBu3vltczRw/видео.html
In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud:
Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?).
ruclips.net/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/видео.html
1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda.
Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers.
ruclips.net/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/видео.html
Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?:
ruclips.net/video/taTzqRHNIEc/видео.html
A discussion of atmospheric chlorine:
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution
Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel)
"Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins."
chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/
Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used.
Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it.
ruclips.net/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/видео.html
How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning.
ruclips.net/video/wm56tV5BbJk/видео.html
Lousy car air conditioning:
ruclips.net/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/видео.html
Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant
ruclips.net/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/видео.html
.
Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia
www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm
Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine...
ruclips.net/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/видео.html
University amazon peru latin america City iquitos study and Investigation gas ozone and the núcleo of planet Earth to the humanity
C'MON, SCISHOW, YOU KNOW THE PLURAL OF LETTERS THAT ARE ABBREVIATIONS, LIKE CFC, IS CFCs. don't promote the "grocer's apostrophe", ie 'when in doubt add an apostrophe. our language skills depreciate every day and we don't want to inspire those who obviously flunked 2nd grade english. if your grandchildren do pay attention in class they will be able to thank you - in English.
Wowwwwwwwwwwe
Wooooooooooooow
Xxx
This does not make sense. There are no CFCs in northern and southern poles. CFCs are heavy gas. It does not rise easily. You are making short cuts from CFC to Cl.
Michael, no wonder you're so smart. Bless you for the correct 'CFCs' and not the gross 'CFC's'!
This is mostly BS. The real reason they made such a stink about CFCs is because the patents had run out and everyone was making them which drove the price down. They couldn’t make money any more so they banned them and started using different refrigerants that were patented.
Well this is what I gathered. You are using government data. They only show "holes" in the ozone above the poles and it's always during the winter. The sun doesn't shine there during that time of year. When sunlight hits oxygen it separates into ozone which is a free radical always trying to reattach. When there isn't enough sunlight to form new ozone then we see the holes..it has been happening since the beginning of time. It isn't man that is causing the holes. It is just nature working the way it is meant to be. Go back and look at the south pole during the summer time and you wont see the hole.
I'm not really using anyone's data, just an image from NASA (if you want to call that data, then I won't challenge that), and I definitely am not out to jump on any particular environmentalism bandwagons. Just trying to show the reaction between halogen atoms and ozone. It's a chemistry thing. But since you brought it up...
To your point, I don't think anyone disputes that the ozone hole moves and changes in size seasonally, but the overriding trend in recent decades has been that at its largest point in any given year, it has been progressively larger and larger. Your point has to do with seasonal trends, mine has to do with annual and decade-long trends. That would be a bit like comparing apples and oranges.
For example:
www.environment.gov.au/node/22194
This 25 year pattern of increasing maximum seasonal size is the trend that most scientists point to as a very likely result of the halogen atoms building up in the region from CFC's
Thanks for the comment.
I would suggest that you may want to find a good chemistry teacher. Take a few courses in physics as well. The two are inextricably linked. It's certainly not easy. You may have to watch the lectures 10 times. All of a sudden, "eureka", difficult concepts suddenly become clear, and as natural as a walk in the park. That's how to have a realistic picture of phenomena like Ozone Depletion, or Global warming, ("two separate issues"), but they have things in common in terms of complexity, solar radiation, and the absorption of that radiation in it's different frequencies.
I suggest (FREE) on line courses, from (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) under (MIT Open Courseware / Video Lectures), with PDF files for course materials if you really want to test yourself. They even offer certificates of completion.
When the first sentence you use contains the words, (government data) it gives the impression that (government data) is somehow more, or less dependable than (private data) a very amateurish assessment of the quality of data. The collection, use, testing, and retesting of data and experimentation will show flaws in the data, not an automatic Knee jerk reaction. It gives the impression that your a neophyte, applying right wing anti government mentality to the issue, or applying some sort of anti science religious bias, which destroys your credibility in terms of serious understanding of scientific matters. I could be wrong, but my instincts and experience tell me to be wary of those who use that terminology. Stop listening to idiots on TV (Loose News), and your crazy uncle. Get the facts, and set yourself "free". The courses are fun anyway, you'll see. Better than hangin out at the pool hall.
Peter Mullen Government data is almost always less dependable than private data. At least that's what I think.
The government always has agendas. The problem is most people aren't aware of their agendas or they believe that the government is here to help us. They do things like take temp readings in a parking lot in the middle of a city just to get a high reading.
I was wrong in my approach, Chem Survival was just explaining a process and I was having a hard typing my comment..I believe I started on it one day and finished the next because I kept getting interrupted.
I'll check out the courses you mentioned and thanks for the info.
TheMddddd I appreciate both view points. And I don't necessarily see much of a difference there. The truth that we would so love to overlook in most cases is this: that research is very rarely altruistically motivated. Public or private: someone is paying the bills, and that financier is usually directly (and almost always indirectly) applying pressure to the project to arrive at findings aligned with that financier's interests. The trick is to learn to view results through a filter of healthy skepticism. The key there is the word 'healthy'.
To single out government researchers I think is the only mistake that TheMddddd made. Rigorous, healthy debate is always welcomed among scientists, but prejudiced attitude-driven commentary is very often met with a powerful push back in the scientific community.
To reiterate my original point. The video is a short attempt to introduce the uninitiated to the reaction mechanisms which most closely explain exactly why the average annual ozone hole size increased over that famous span of time during which CFC's were in wide-spread use. I do not claim to know for a fact that it is the only player, or even the major player, but I can say with certainty as a PhD Chemist and University Professor, the hypothesis has tremendous merit and curtailment of CFC use was definitely the right thing to do.
As the years go by and we observe the hole's behavior as the atomic chlorine in the upper atmosphere is naturally cleared, we will come even closer to knowing if it really was the cause!
TheMddddd It worked. That's all I know. I made some and gave it to someone with breast cancer. They were told last Friday that the tumors were no longer visible on the MRI.. the doctor told her not to have the previously recommended mastectomy... It's amazing what one can find on youtube.
waaaaaay too long for what it should be
Thank you