Hi Gnome Gnomer, what version of Flame are you using. Generally, if you get jittery edges, you can shrink or dilate the matte. Most tend to blur the matte of the selective or use addition masking to add to the selective. Hope this helps.
Great in theory but doesnt work very well on anything less than perfect shots. I have numerous CU but the tool doesn't recognise most of the subjects forehead. With how loose the mattes are you end up having to track the face anyway and not saving anytime at all. Beautybox is far superior imo. Could is be a colorspace thing as im working in ACES
Hi Ben, The machine learning is only as good as its training. That said, ours has been trained on countless hours of faces etc. However we do recognise that it is impossible to cover every face and every eventuality. This is the reason we made the custom maps that you can define your own regions of the face to account for these situations. The ML is looking at faces in the picture and not colour spaces. However, please bear in mind that ML is still quite young and unfortunately wont solve every situation its given. Thanks for the feedback!
@@Autodesk_Flame A really dum business decision. Forward that to the appropriate department. Flame would kick many softwares off the market with such an impressive toolset. IN 2017 it had innovative tools other softwares didn't even have back then Damn it I would have to figure out how to run it in some VM or some sht
Hi Simonas Korsakas, Thanks for the feedback. In terms of the interface, it has been designed for fluid gestural interaction across the application which most of our users appreciate compared to other software applications. However you're entitled to your opinion. Many thanks.
@@Autodesk_Flame No need to be this butthurt over your UI and UX all over the comments and cite some vague user stats as PR response especially when you work for Autodesk. Nobody buys that. I'm telling as a UI UX guy. Flame's interface is made by cavemen. That's how bad it is. It doesn't go along such an impressive toolset. I don't need any stats to state that almost 95% of your use base constantly scream about it.
@@Autodesk_Flame Mocha and Silhouette have some similar tools and suffer from similar interface issues but not as bad and yet still horrible. When you talk to the people you supposedly the designer and manager of the software you understand why it's this bad. It's like talking to a dum fruit salesman with a software manual about issues you have. Flame must be suffering from the same and even much worse. Funny that all those horrible interfaces are in products made in the UK. makes you think. Brits seem to have no knack for system design at all. When you recall the imperial system it all clicks into place. LOL
As a long time After Effects user, this is both terrifying and super exciting to learn!
This is amazing. I never realised that you could do this to the ML matchbox. ❤
OMG. I spend HOURs doing this stuff in Resolve by hand. I really miss using the Flame.
Mark, Flame misses you too :). Hope you are well!
Not working. Very unstable and jittery tracking. Tried on tutorial media.
Hi Gnome Gnomer, what version of Flame are you using. Generally, if you get jittery edges, you can shrink or dilate the matte. Most tend to blur the matte of the selective or use addition masking to add to the selective. Hope this helps.
@@Autodesk_Flame I got it. This is not to be considered as precise tracking thing. For that purposes there's a Motion Warp.
hello, can someone help me, a shadow scene of the boom for the actor's face and he is talking
Hi Fernando Andrade, are you saying the shadow of the boom mike went over the actors face?
The Flame Learning Channel passes by the actor's face
Great in theory but doesnt work very well on anything less than perfect shots. I have numerous CU but the tool doesn't recognise most of the subjects forehead. With how loose the mattes are you end up having to track the face anyway and not saving anytime at all. Beautybox is far superior imo.
Could is be a colorspace thing as im working in ACES
Hi Ben, The machine learning is only as good as its training. That said, ours has been trained on countless hours of faces etc. However we do recognise that it is impossible to cover every face and every eventuality. This is the reason we made the custom maps that you can define your own regions of the face to account for these situations. The ML is looking at faces in the picture and not colour spaces. However, please bear in mind that ML is still quite young and unfortunately wont solve every situation its given. Thanks for the feedback!
@@Autodesk_Flame Oh yeah i get that, but this shot is about as clean of a CU as you will get in film or TV and it just can't workout the forehead.
@@bennorth4024 I understand. If you would like me to take a look at it, please let me know and I'll see what can be done.
WTF don't we still have a Windows version of this software?!
Unfortunately this is a question I cannot answer. We currently support Mac OS and Centos with Linux.
@@Autodesk_Flame A really dum business decision. Forward that to the appropriate department. Flame would kick many softwares off the market with such an impressive toolset. IN 2017 it had innovative tools other softwares didn't even have back then
Damn it I would have to figure out how to run it in some VM or some sht
great software, terrible UI
Hi Simonas Korsakas, Thanks for the feedback. In terms of the interface, it has been designed for fluid gestural interaction across the application which most of our users appreciate compared to other software applications. However you're entitled to your opinion. Many thanks.
@@Autodesk_Flame I appreciate your answer :) But yes, in my opinion there is room for improvement :)
For me it's the best UI. It's the type of UI most Adobe users won't fully understand.
@@Autodesk_Flame No need to be this butthurt over your UI and UX all over the comments and cite some vague user stats as PR response especially when you work for Autodesk. Nobody buys that.
I'm telling as a UI UX guy. Flame's interface is made by cavemen. That's how bad it is. It doesn't go along such an impressive toolset. I don't need any stats to state that almost 95% of your use base constantly scream about it.
@@Autodesk_Flame Mocha and Silhouette have some similar tools and suffer from similar interface issues but not as bad and yet still horrible. When you talk to the people you supposedly the designer and manager of the software you understand why it's this bad. It's like talking to a dum fruit salesman with a software manual about issues you have. Flame must be suffering from the same and even much worse.
Funny that all those horrible interfaces are in products made in the UK. makes you think. Brits seem to have no knack for system design at all. When you recall the imperial system it all clicks into place. LOL